Scientist Elena Chrysostomou also used a relocation support scheme to swap a big city for smalltown US. In 2024 she relocated from San Diego, California, to Jacksonville, a town of 17,700 people in rural Illinois.

The move was backed by the Jacksonville Regional Economic Development Corporation (JREDC), which gave her $5,000 in cash, plus a “quality of life package” worth $4,000 that includes free gym memberships and golf passes.

The JREDC says that while the region is “already a great place to live”, the support scheme helps to “sweeten the deal”.

Elena was spending $3,000 renting a one-bedroom apartment in San Diego, but she now owns a three-bedroom home, with a mortgage of $1,868. At the same time, her salary has gone up 22% after she changed jobs, and her commute has gone down from a 15-minute drive to one of just one minute.

“I never thought that I’d be able to afford a house on my own, I always thought I’d need a partner, and even then, in San Diego, it would be so tough,” she says.

“It’s just more freeing. There’s more security and independence.”

While both she and Brianna have no regrets, they do admit to some drawbacks to their new lives. These include the narrower range of activities and restaurant choices, leaving behind friends and family, and for Brianna the difficulty of settling her children into new schools.

And while in Portland Brianna enjoyed walking to parks and shops, she now relies on her car to get anywhere.

But overall she says she is thrilled. “I have the biggest savings I’ve ever had in my life, and I’m a homeowner, and I can do things with my kids – we actually went on vacation for the first time in my youngest’s life.”

WASHINGTON — Elon Musk’s X Corp and SpaceXAI said Monday they have resolved their federal antitrust lawsuit against Apple, ending a year-long legal battle in Texas that had accused the iPhone maker of conspiring to illegally monopolize the markets for smartphones and generative AI chatbots.

In a court filing in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, attorneys for X and SpaceXAI moved to dismiss the lawsuit the companies brought against Apple last year. The filing did not explain the reasons behind the dismissal or indicate whether a settlement had been reached between the parties. X and SpaceXAI said they intend to continue pursuing related claims against OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, which remains a defendant in the broader case. Representatives for Musk’s companies, Apple and OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment following the filing.

The lawsuit, originally filed on August 25, 2025, accused Apple of violating federal and state antitrust laws, including Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act, by exclusively integrating ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence features across iPhones and other Apple devices. The complaint argued that Apple’s June 2024 decision to make ChatGPT the sole AI chatbot woven into iOS gave OpenAI’s product a structural advantage that rivals, including Musk’s Grok chatbot, could not overcome on merit alone.

X Corp and xAI described the arrangement in their original complaint as amounting to “two monopolists joining forces to ensure their continued dominance,” seeking billions of dollars in damages along with court orders to unwind what the companies characterized as an anticompetitive conspiracy. The complaint alleged that ChatGPT controlled “at least 80 percent” of the generative AI chatbot market at the time of filing, while Grok held only “a few percent” of that market despite what the plaintiffs described as superior underlying capabilities. The filing also claimed the exclusive Apple-OpenAI arrangement gave ChatGPT “exclusive access to billions of user prompts originating from hundreds of millions of iPhones,” a data advantage the plaintiffs argued would be difficult for competitors to overcome absent legal intervention.

Beyond the exclusivity arrangement itself, the lawsuit also accused Apple of manipulating App Store search rankings to favor ChatGPT while suppressing visibility for competing AI products, including Grok. Musk had separately raised concerns publicly in the weeks before the lawsuit was filed, questioning why his own apps failed to appear in Apple’s “Must Have” App Store section despite what he described as strong underlying rankings, even as Grok ranked second in Apple’s Productivity category and X ranked first in the News category at the time.

Apple and OpenAI both moved to dismiss the case following its filing, but a federal judge denied those motions on November 13, 2025, allowing the litigation to proceed toward further discovery and potential trial. Monday’s dismissal filing by X and SpaceXAI marks the end of that litigation path as it pertains to Apple specifically, even as the companies signaled their intention to keep pressing similar claims against OpenAI.

Industry observers have pointed to the underlying data dynamics at the heart of the case as a significant factor in the competitive landscape for AI chatbots. Midhun Krishna M, an MLOps engineer at Juno AI, told the outlet Decrypt that Apple’s exclusive arrangement with OpenAI created a lasting structural disadvantage for rivals. “Apple’s exclusive ChatGPT deal has left rivals like Grok unable to match the data scale, and they continue to fall behind,” Krishna said, adding that the integration gives OpenAI control of what he called “the largest real-time feedback loop,” which he said helps ensure “accuracy and dominance” for ChatGPT relative to competing chatbot products.

The resolution of the Apple portion of the case comes amid a broader pattern of legal disputes involving Musk’s various companies and their AI ambitions. xAI, the artificial intelligence venture Musk founded and later merged with X Corp, has been involved in a series of legal skirmishes across the AI industry as it competes with better-established rivals including OpenAI and Google for both users and the underlying data and distribution advantages that shape competition in the sector. Separately, xAI has itself faced legal action from other companies in the technology space, including a lawsuit brought by the creators of an Ethereum-based gaming network.

Neither Reuters nor other outlets reporting on Monday’s filing were able to determine whether any financial terms were exchanged as part of the resolution, whether either party admitted liability, or whether the case against Apple was dismissed with or without prejudice, a legal distinction that would determine whether X and SpaceXAI could revive the claims against Apple at a later date. The absence of detailed terms in the public filing leaves open the question of what, if anything, Apple may have agreed to in order to resolve the dispute, including any changes to its App Store ranking practices or its exclusivity arrangement with OpenAI.

With the case against OpenAI continuing to move forward, attention now turns to how that portion of the litigation develops, and whether similar questions about exclusivity arrangements and data access in the fast-growing AI chatbot market will resurface in other legal or regulatory venues as competition among AI developers continues to intensify across the industry.

Thailand’s Board of Investment approved six major projects worth $29 billion, led by TikTok’s $25 billion data center expansion. Three data center projects totaling $27 billion underscore Thailand’s emergence as a regional digital hub. Additional approvals include renewable energy and resource-based industries. The government strengthened power infrastructure and clean energy access to support tech investment growth.

Key Points

• Major Investment Approvals: Thailand’s Board of Investment approved six projects worth 958 billion baht ($29 billion), led by TikTok’s 842 billion baht data infrastructure expansion across Bangkok and surrounding provinces.

• Data Center Focus: Three of six approved projects target data centers and hosting services valued at 913 billion baht, positioning Thailand as a regional hub for digital infrastructure, cloud services, and AI-driven technology.

• Strategic Support Measures: The BOI fast-tracked nine additional projects under Thailand FastPass mechanism (bringing total to 25 projects worth 223 billion baht) and coordinated with energy agencies to strengthen electricity readiness and expand clean energy access for attracting high-technology investment.

Thailand’s Investment Boom: Strategic Infrastructure and Digital Growth

Major Investment Approvals Drive Thailand’s Digital Infrastructure Expansion

Thailand’s Board of Investment has approved six landmark projects totaling 958 billion baht (approximately USD 29 billion), with TikTok System (Thailand) leading the initiative through a massive 842 billion baht data infrastructure expansion. This approval demonstrates Thailand’s emerging prominence as a regional hub for data centers, cloud services, and AI-driven digital infrastructure. The projects span multiple sectors, including three significant data center investments valued at 913 billion baht collectively. TikTok’s expansion will enhance server capacity and data storage across Bangkok, Samut Prakan, and Chachoengsao Province, while also committing to digital literacy and e-commerce curriculum development for Thai entrepreneurs. Additional approved projects include Skyline Data Center’s 46 billion baht investment and Bridge Data Centres’ 24.6 billion baht facility, both strategically positioned to support growing regional digital demands.

Accelerating Implementation Through FastPass and Energy Readiness Initiatives

To expedite project deployment, the BOI selected nine additional projects worth 52 billion baht for the Thailand FastPass mechanism, bringing the total FastPass portfolio to 25 projects valued at 223 billion baht. This streamlined approval system coordinates multiple government agencies to reduce bureaucratic delays and accelerate operations. Simultaneously, the Board addressed critical infrastructure requirements by implementing power readiness measures with the Ministry of Energy and Energy Regulatory Commission, particularly focusing on the Eastern region’s electricity supply for incoming investments. The initiatives include accelerating Thailand’s Power Development Plan issuance and establishing Direct Renewable Power Purchase Agreements to enable private companies direct renewable electricity transactions, reflecting recognition that sufficient power infrastructure is essential for attracting large-scale digital investment.

Complementary Investments in Sustainability and Strategic Industries

Beyond digital infrastructure, Thailand approved three strategic projects addressing sustainability and resource development. PureCycle (Thailand) invested 8.18 billion baht in recycled plastic pellet production, utilizing exclusively licensed P&G technology to serve Asian markets. Dan Khun Thot Wind One committed 4.7 billion baht toward an 89-megawatt wind power generation project, while ASEAN Potash Chaiyaphum invested 31.4 billion baht in potassium chloride production for fertilizer applications. These projects underscore Thailand’s commitment to clean energy access and circular economy principles. The BOI emphasized implementing clean energy mechanisms, including Utility Green Tariff 2, and regulatory improvements facilitating renewable energy investment. This comprehensive approach positions Thailand competitively for the next investment cycle by combining digital infrastructure, power readiness, clean energy options, and skilled workforce development.

The UK’s position as a leading maritime nation and a key player in achieving its Net Zero obligations will be apparent for the next decade.

Maritime UK and hence those whose shipping jobs depend on the industry will hope that the necessary investment will be distinct enough to keep Maritime UK’s members reassured within the industry.

The Green Recovery has been in the government’s minds recently. Progress has been achieved through the emergence of the Clean Maritime Demonstration Competition (CMDC). This was announced as part of the Prime Minister’s 10-point plan for a Green Industrial Revolution. Also established was UK-SHORE which has received backing from the Department of Transport’s Decarbonisation Plan.

Maritime UK are hoping to influence the debate, keeping the industry at the forefront of the government’s minds and receiving backing from Ministers in the upcoming Parliamentary Debate, the date of which is unconfirmed presently.

The ways and means of maintaining a presence in MPs minds, regarding the outcome of the CSR, can be achieved though knowing the address of your local MP and how to contact them, having a template email to speed up communication and a graphic to post on your social media.

All of this is geared up to focus attention on the sector. The debate is being heard in The Houses of Parliament and Council Offices up and down the country.

Issues that are affecting government investment in the shipping industry include climate change, with transport being a main contributor to Green House Gases. Funds are required to help with renewal of the fleet and development of new propulsion technologies.

The sector is feeling the strain compared to construction, mining and quarrying who have all received a dedicated diesel to hydrogen fund in H2 strategy.

For the first time the UK’s emissions are being measured up against the International Emissions targets thus making for a more challenging set of figures. The UK’s sixth Carbon Budget will assess the potential for the UK reaching net zero by 2050.

There are other costs that have materialised recently and one of them is taxes for ports, some £40 million extra fuel levy, where the shipping industry has not received any exemptions, unlike some other sectors.

£20 million was however earmarked for the CMDC in the Prime Minister’s ten-point plan. It will be a one-off addition to a sector facing transition and will allow for feasibility studies and technology trials within the industry.

The government understands the need for a sector which needs to be at the forefront of the design and development of the shipbuilding fleet all over the world.

UK-SHORE or the UK Shipping Office for Reducing Emissions has been established to help with decarbonisation plans. It is hoped that bodies like this will pave the way for the UK being a continuing major player in the shipping sector.

It is hoped that coastal hot spots will see the emergence of an employment bubble where new technologies are giving the UK some great opportunities, driving growth in these sometimes neglected communities.

The analysis showed that out of 292 funds, 189 delivered positive returns, while 47 generated double-digit returns. Around 102 funds gave negative returns during the same period.

Among these seven funds, five were smallcap funds, while one each was a focused fund and a midcap fund. The top-performing fund delivered over 30% returns during the period.

Also Read | Samir Arora-backed Helios Mid Cap Fund exits Dixon Technologies, 2 others; adds 7 stocks

TRUSTMF Small Cap Fund, the best-performing fund on the list, delivered a return of 32.28% in the last one year. It was followed by Motilal Oswal Focused Fund with a 26.50% return in the same period.

Live Events

The next four funds on the list were smallcap funds. Bank of India Small Cap Fund and Motilal Oswal Small Cap Fund delivered returns of 25.88% and 23.76%, respectively, during the period.
Union Small Cap Fund and ITI Small Cap Fund offered returns of 23.18% and 21.60%, respectively. HSBC Midcap Fund delivered a return of 20.19% in the last one year.

How did other equity funds fare?

LIC MF Value Fund and Aditya Birla SL Small Cap Fund delivered returns of 19.59% and 19.24%, respectively, in the last one year. Bajaj Finserv Small Cap Fund offered a return of 17.08% during the period.

Two smallcap funds, Quant Small Cap Fund and Sundaram Small Cap Fund, delivered returns of 15.44% and 15.23%, respectively, during the period. Helios Mid Cap Fund posted a gain of 12.76%.

Two funds from Quant Mutual Fund, Quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund and Quant Flexi Cap Fund, posted returns of 12.55% and 12.44%, respectively, in the last one year.

Two funds from Axis Mutual Fund, Axis Small Cap Fund and Axis Multicap Fund, delivered returns of 10.27% and 10.22%, respectively. ITI Focused Fund was the last fund on the list to deliver a double-digit return, at 10.04%.

Nippon India Small Cap Fund, the largest smallcap fund based on assets managed, delivered a return of 9.25% during the period. Edelweiss Small Cap Fund posted a gain of 8.42%.

Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund, the fund with the highest NAV, posted a gain of 7.32% during the period. HDFC Mid Cap Fund, the largest midcap fund based on assets managed, offered a gain of 6.38%.

Unifi Flexi Cap Fund delivered a return of 5.52% in the last one year. Canara Rob ELSS-Tax Saver Fund was the last fund to deliver a positive return, at 0.04%.

Negative performers

Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund lost the most, declining around 11.02% during the period. It was followed by Franklin India Focused Equity Fund, which lost 9.34%.

Two funds from Quantum Mutual Fund, Quantum Value Fund and Quantum Value Fund, lost 8.08% and 8%, respectively, in the last one year.

Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund, the largest active fund and flexicap fund based on assets managed, lost 4.64% in the past one year. SBI ELSS Tax Saver Fund, the oldest ELSS fund, lost 3.25% during the same period.

SBI Contra Fund, the oldest and largest contra fund, lost 2.70% in the past one year. PGIM India Flexi Cap Fund posted the lowest decline, at around 0.03%.

Also Read | SIF AUM rises 34% to Rs 31,175 crore in August; inflows jump 56% MoM: Report

We considered all equity funds, excluding sectoral and thematic funds. We considered regular and growth-oriented funds and calculated their performance over the last one year.

Note: The above exercise is not a recommendation. The exercise was done to find which equity funds delivered over 20% return in the last one year. One should not make investment or redemption decisions based on the above exercise. One should always consider their risk appetite, investment horizon and financial goals before making any investment decision.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

If you have any mutual fund queries, message ET Mutual Funds on Facebook/Twitter. We will get them answered by our panel of experts. Do share your questions at ETMFqueries@timesinternet.in along with your age, risk profile, and Twitter handle.

Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

OMAHA, Neb. — Warren Buffett’s warning that today’s stock market resembles “a church with a casino attached” is drawing fresh attention as Wall Street navigates one of its rockier stretches in months, with surging oil prices, rising bond yields, inflation pressure and renewed doubts about artificial intelligence spending all weighing on stocks at once.

Speaking in a CNBC interview around Berkshire Hathaway’s 2026 annual meeting earlier this year, Buffett was asked for his view on what he described as a historically expensive market. His response combined a familiar metaphor with a blunt caution about investor behavior. “I’ve compared the markets to a church with a casino attached,” Buffett said, explaining that the church represents long-term investing while the casino represents short-term risk-taking. “The casino has gotten very attractive to people,” he warned, adding that “that’s not investing, it’s not speculating, it’s gambling.”

Buffett was careful to note that his warning was not a blanket condemnation of the stock market itself. “That doesn’t mean that investing is terrible,” he said. “It does mean that prices for an awful lot of things will look very silly.”

That comment has taken on renewed relevance as markets have struggled in recent weeks. Oil prices have climbed sharply amid escalating tension in the Middle East, a discouraging inflation report has added to pressure on the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, and turmoil in the bond market has pushed yields to some of their highest levels in years. Compounding those pressures, fresh concerns about the pace of artificial intelligence development have rattled technology stocks and cast a shadow over Anthropic’s planned initial public offering, expected in October, one of the most closely watched stock market debuts of the year.

Major indexes had climbed to repeated record highs in the years since the most recent bear market ended in 2022, a run that made it easy for some investors to grow complacent about risk. Even weak companies can see their share prices soar when speculative enthusiasm takes hold, but those gains typically prove unsustainable, and such stocks tend to suffer the steepest declines once the broader market turns lower.

One measure that has drawn particular attention from market watchers is the S&P 500 Shiller CAPE Ratio, a valuation metric dating back to 1871 that compares stock prices to average inflation-adjusted earnings over the preceding decade. The higher the ratio climbs, the greater the likelihood that the broader market is overvalued relative to historical norms. Over the past 155 years, the CAPE ratio has averaged around 17. It first spiked to nearly 35 just before the onset of the Great Depression, and later reached an all-time high of 44 during the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, a level widely regarded in hindsight as a clear signal of significant overvaluation.

The ratio has remained elevated above 40 since May of this year, a level that places the current market among the most richly valued in its history, trailing only the dot-com era by that particular measure. While no single metric can reliably predict the market’s future direction, the elevated CAPE ratio adds statistical weight to Buffett’s broader warning about speculative excess building up in parts of the market.

History offers a sobering reminder of what has followed previous periods of extreme valuation. When the dot-com bubble burst in March 2000, the S&P 500 lost nearly half its value over the following two years. Just a few years later, the index faced the Great Recession, again losing more than half its value from peak to trough. Despite those two historic downturns occurring within less than a decade of each other, the S&P 500 has still delivered total returns exceeding 700% by today, underscoring Buffett’s broader point that long-term investing in the stock market has continued to reward patient investors even through severe periods of decline.

That long-term resilience is central to why Buffett’s warning is not, in itself, a call to abandon the stock market altogether. Rather, it reflects his long-held philosophy that investors should distinguish between disciplined, long-term investing grounded in a company’s underlying fundamentals and the kind of short-term speculative trading that can inflate valuations well beyond what businesses are realistically worth. Buying into hype-driven rallies may feel harmless while those investments continue climbing, but such positions carry outsized risk once market sentiment shifts and speculative excess begins to unwind.

For investors navigating the current environment, that distinction carries practical implications. Stocks purchased at fair valuations and backed by solid underlying business fundamentals have historically proven far more resilient during market downturns than those propelled higher primarily by speculative enthusiasm. As the current bout of market turbulence continues to play out, with the debate over AI development timelines, interest rate policy and geopolitical risk in the Middle East all contributing to volatility, Buffett’s decades-old framework for separating disciplined investing from speculation offers one lens through which investors can evaluate their own portfolios heading into a potentially turbulent stretch for markets.

Whether the current elevated valuations across the broader market prove to be a temporary feature of an unusually strong bull run or an early warning sign of a more significant correction remains, as always, impossible to predict with certainty. But with the Shiller CAPE Ratio sitting at levels not seen since the dot-com era, and with several distinct sources of market stress converging simultaneously, Buffett’s warning about the risks of treating speculation as investing appears, to many market observers, more timely now than when he first offered it earlier this year.

BOSTON — Robert Mills will go “brand by brand” to develop strategies as he takes over leadership at B&G Foods, Inc.

“We have to go brand by brand and understand, is it structural or is it a moment in time?” he said Sept. 9 at the Barclays Global Consumer Staples Conference in Boston. “Is it macro? More importantly, what’s driving (the brand)? What’s the household penetration? What are the trends in the brand? What are the trends in the category? Are we priced correctly? Is there innovation?”

Mills became president and chief executive officer of B&G Foods, Parsippany, NJ, on Aug. 10, succeeding Casey Keller, who retired. Mills has been on the board of directors for B&G Foods since March 2018.

Two newly acquired brands will receive attention. B&G Foods in March completed its acquisition of the broth and stock business of Del Monte Foods Corp. and its affiliates, including the College Inn and Kitchen Basics brands, for approximately $110 million in cash.

“This is a great example where I think we’ve leveraged and made a smart investment,” Mills said. “We’ve brought in two brands at a lower multiple that’s able to be accretive on day one to our overall margin structure, and it is an on-trend demand with that consumer.”

B&G Foods needs to maintain College Inn’s position as a top brand among broths and stocks in the Northeast, Mills said, and Kitchen Basics is a premium brand in broths and stocks.

“It has grown under our watch over the last few months,” Mills said of Kitchen Basics. “We also see a tremendous opportunity to expand that and potentially take the brand into other categories.”

He noted that B&G Foods has found success outside of traditional measured channels in places like club stores, dollar stores, online and private label.

“This is an area that the team has focused on over the last couple of years, and it’s a key part of our strategy, and it will continue to be a key part of our strategy, especially when you look at plant utilization and where we can continue to take market share.

“With that being said, retail is the core of what our brands exist for, and we have underperformed there. We have to have a greater sense of urgency.”

When it comes to the frontiers of Artificial Intelligence, I’m surely not your run-of-the-mill expert. I have some sense of models, agents, and bots. And I think I understand concerns that rogue AI agents can break free of their human instructions, or what the industry sometimes calls “misalignment.”

Yes, humans need to be able to keep control of the machines. Yet I also know something about election year ruses, including political hoaxes, such as we’ve seen in the past. Now that Democrats, led by Senator Bernie Sanders, want the government to completely stop the AI industry, including agents, data centers, and the whole nine yards. Well, this has the feel of the Democrats’ hysteria, make that existential hysteria, during the Biden years over climate change.  Do you remember that?

It would have led to our complete economic ruination, were it not for President Trump’s re-election, and his revival of “drill, baby, drill,” which to a large extent has saved us from Iran and their friends in Communist China. Did I say China? Nobody in China is pulling back on AI. That’s part of the stupidity of the Bernie Sanders Democrats, and their apparent fellow travelers, at places like Anthropic and OpenAI.

If we just let free enterprise work its magic on this new technology, we will leave China and everybody else in the dust, as we create millions of new jobs at higher wages, leading to exponential prosperity, and even lower taxes. Plus, we will harness the technology, that is, if we stop government from running it. That’s the real Bernie Sanders agenda.

The White House technology advisor, David Sacks, in his recent tweet, has the story completely right. He’s basically saying if you want to slow down your models, fine, slow down your models. 

Then, in a hard hitting statement, Mr. Sacks adds: “But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability.” He urges: “stop pretending METR,” the non-profit Model Evaluation and Threat Research, “is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff.”

Mr. Sack asserts: “most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack… So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it.” In Mr. Sack’s appraisal, “the easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it.”

Then he concludes “If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psy-op.” That psy-op part is very important. Anthropic and others are left-leaning companies. And when they talk about world government, it’s time for everyone to flinch. I’m not for world anything. And you can be sure China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, and plenty of other American enemies and adversaries, won’t abide by world anything.

And then there’s Mr. Trump correctly raising the issue of a hoax no different from Russia, Russia, Russia. He asks why anybody would want to stop the greatest economic development engine in history. And he is right to ask that. But then our friend the ace New York Post columnist, Miranda Devine, provides some important research that the people behind Bernie Sanders and Anthropic, are CIA veterans of the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax that tried to stop Mr. Trump.

And unsurprisingly, this crowd is also tied in with President Obama, Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, and Senator Chuck Schumer. All this AI armageddon, is indeed “election season psy-op.” And even Nvidia’s chief executive, Jensen Huang, has dismissed the AI fearmongering as “complete nonsense,” at a recent Goldman Sachs conference. You know what? Luddites are bad enough, but left-wing election-year luddites are even worse. Ignore them.