LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles Lakers guard Austin Reaves has been diagnosed with a Grade 2 left oblique muscle strain, sidelining the 27-year-old for the remainder of the 2025-26 regular season and casting serious doubt on his availability for the start of the NBA playoffs, dealing a major blow to a team already missing co-star Luka Dončić.
Austin Reaves #15 of the Los Angeles Lakers
Reaves is expected to miss four to six weeks, according to multiple reports citing league sources. That timeline would keep the versatile scorer out through at least the early portion of the postseason, with the first round scheduled to begin April 18. Some medical experts suggest the recovery could stretch longer if rib cartilage is involved, while the minimum for a Grade 2 oblique strain is typically around three weeks.
The injury occurred during the Lakers’ lopsided 139-96 loss to the Oklahoma City Thunder on April 2. Reaves appeared to tweak his left side while reaching for a rebound in the first half but returned to finish the game, logging 27 minutes and scoring 15 points. He and Dončić, who suffered a Grade 2 hamstring strain in the same contest, both played through visible discomfort in what became a blowout defeat.
Lakers coach J.J. Redick later defended the decision to keep both players in the game, but faced criticism for potentially exacerbating the injuries in a non-competitive matchup. Reaves underwent an initial MRI in Dallas that reportedly scanned the wrong area, prompting a second imaging session on April 4 that confirmed the oblique strain. Redick expressed frustration with the diagnostic process, noting the Lakers had clearly specified the target area.
Reaves, often called “AR-15” by fans, has enjoyed a breakout 2025-26 season as one of the Lakers’ most reliable performers. Through 51 games, he averaged 23.3 points, 4.7 rebounds, 5.5 assists and shot 49% from the field while playing 34.5 minutes per night. His scoring, playmaking and clutch shooting made him a vital complement to LeBron James and the newly acquired Dončić in Los Angeles’ revamped lineup.
Advertisement
The double blow of losing both Reaves and Dončić for the final stretch of the regular season has left the Lakers scrambling. The team announced Reaves would miss the remaining five regular-season games, with the finale set for April 12 against Utah. Los Angeles has already made roster adjustments, including a reported $18 million move to bolster depth amid the injury crisis.
Medical Outlook and Recovery Timeline
Sports medicine specialists describe oblique strains as particularly painful due to the muscle’s proximity to nerves and rib attachments. A Grade 2 strain involves a partial tear, with recovery complicated by the constant torso rotation required in basketball. NBA data shows less severe oblique injuries average about 17 days missed, while higher-grade cases can sideline players for up to nine weeks. For Reaves, the consensus projection of four to six weeks places his potential return somewhere in the first or second round of the playoffs — assuming the Lakers advance.
Dr. Evan Jeffries and other injury analysts have noted that rushing back too soon risks reinjury, drawing comparisons to similar cases like Luka Dončić’s current hamstring issue. Conservative management is expected, with Reaves focusing on rest, targeted rehabilitation and gradual return-to-play protocols under the Lakers’ medical staff.
Reaves has a history of playing through minor ailments, but this marks one of the more significant setbacks in his young career. The undrafted guard out of Oklahoma has steadily evolved into a cornerstone for the Lakers since joining the league in 2021, earning praise for his toughness, basketball IQ and improved three-point shooting.
Advertisement
Impact on Lakers’ Playoff Hopes
The injuries come at a precarious time for Los Angeles. With Dončić already ruled out for the rest of the regular season and Reaves now joining him on the sideline, the Lakers must lean heavily on veterans like LeBron James and a supporting cast that includes role players stepping into larger minutes. Questions swirl about seeding, matchup advantages and whether the team can build enough chemistry without its two leading scorers.
Analysts describe the situation as “devastating” for playoff aspirations. Even if Reaves returns in late April or early May, he may require ramp-up time to regain full explosiveness and conditioning. The Lakers’ depth will be tested in what could be a grueling first-round series.
Reaves’ absence also complicates long-term roster planning. He is eligible for a significant contract extension or new deal in the coming offseason, with some projections linking him to a $241 million maximum-level agreement. His injury performance this season has only heightened his value, but any prolonged recovery could factor into negotiations.
LeBron James publicly expressed disappointment over the injuries to both Reaves and Dončić, highlighting the emotional toll on the locker room after what had been a promising stretch.
Advertisement
Broader Context and Lakers’ Response
The Lakers have faced a season of highs and lows, including the high-profile acquisition of Dončić that reshaped expectations. Now, with key pieces sidelined, the focus shifts to resilience and opportunistic play from the supporting cast. Coach Redick has emphasized staying connected and preparing for every scenario as the team eyes a playoff berth.
Reaves has remained positive in public comments, expressing confidence in his teammates and a commitment to returning as strong as possible. He is expected to travel with the team and stay engaged in meetings and film study during rehabilitation.
NBA observers note that oblique injuries can be unpredictable, but modern sports science — including advanced imaging, regenerative therapies and individualized rehab programs — often helps players return closer to the optimistic end of timelines.
For now, the Lakers must navigate the final regular-season games and prepare for the postseason without two of their top offensive weapons. Whether Reaves can suit up for a deep playoff run remains uncertain, but his track record of toughness suggests he will push to rejoin the lineup at the earliest safe opportunity.
Advertisement
The injury has sparked widespread discussion across NBA circles, with fans and analysts debating the decision to play both stars in a blowout and the broader implications for Los Angeles’ championship window. As the calendar turns toward the playoffs, all eyes will be on Reaves’ recovery progress and the Lakers’ ability to adapt.
Austin Reaves, a fan favorite known for his underdog story and clutch performances, faces his toughest test yet. Lakers supporters hope the “Hillbilly Kobe” can once again defy the odds when he returns to the court.
OAKLAND, Calif. — A viral X thread capturing live courtroom notes from Elon Musk’s high-stakes lawsuit against OpenAI has thrust the landmark trial into the spotlight, with the plaintiff’s lawyer dramatically declaring that the company “stole a charity” created for the benefit of humanity rather than private profit. The April 28 post by attorney Ariel Givner, who received real-time updates from inside the federal courthouse, quickly spread as opening statements laid bare the bitter feud between Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
Givner’s thread, posted during the first full day of testimony in the Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building, detailed Musk’s side of the story: how he co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit dedicated to safe, open artificial intelligence development for all mankind. Musk contributed tens of millions of dollars, recruited top talent including Ilya Sutskever, and emphasized existential risks from advanced AI. The lawyer argued that OpenAI’s later shift to a for-profit structure, fueled by billions from Microsoft, betrayed that mission and left the nonprofit shell with “almost no assets.”
The dramatic line — “THEY STOLE A CHARITY” — capped the plaintiff’s opening and echoed through social media. Givner’s notes highlighted an emotional close: “NOBODY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO STEAL A CHARITY.” The thread also shared a 2017 email exchange in which Musk told Altman, “Either go do something on your own or continue with OpenAI as a nonprofit,” and Altman replied enthusiastically, “I remain enthusiastic about the non-profit structure!” A contemporaneous diary entry from OpenAI President Greg Brockman reportedly called the nonprofit commitment a “lie” if the company pursued a B-corp structure.
9/ This email exchange from September 2017 was shown to jurors
Musk: “Either go do something on your own or continue with OpenAI as a nonprofit.”
Advertisement
Altman: “I remain enthusiastic about the non-profit structure!”
The lawsuit, filed in 2024, accuses Altman, Brockman and OpenAI of breaching fiduciary duties by converting the organization into a profit-driven entity valued at hundreds of billions and preparing for an IPO. Musk seeks more than $150 billion in damages and an order to unwind the changes, returning control and intellectual property to the nonprofit. He claims the original mission required no financial return and focused on humanity’s benefit, not enriching insiders or partners like Microsoft.
Advertisement
OpenAI’s lawyers fired back in their opening, arguing Musk knew about plans for a for-profit arm from the start and left the board voluntarily in 2018. They portray the suit as a competitive move by Musk, whose own xAI startup now rivals OpenAI. Defense attorney William Savitt told jurors the case boils down to Musk not getting his way, not a betrayal of any binding promise.
The trial, which began with jury selection on April 27 and opened in earnest April 28, has already featured heated testimony. Musk took the stand as the first witness, recounting his upbringing, early companies and long-standing fears about artificial general intelligence. He described OpenAI as a response to Google’s dominance and insisted he could have launched it as a for-profit but chose the nonprofit path for ethical reasons. Cross-examination grew tense, with Musk accusing OpenAI’s lawyer of trying to “trick” him and snapping, “You’re misleading.”
As of May 1, the proceedings have entered their fourth day. Musk has spent multiple days on the witness stand, with cross-examination continuing and expected to wrap soon. Altman, Brockman and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella are among those slated to testify later. The monthlong trial before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers could reshape AI development, corporate governance and the balance between nonprofit ideals and commercial realities in Silicon Valley.
Legal observers say the case hinges on whether OpenAI’s founders made enforceable promises to keep the organization nonprofit forever. Musk’s team presented the 2017 emails and Brockman’s diary as evidence of bad faith. OpenAI counters that the nonprofit structure was always intended to evolve with a for-profit subsidiary to fund research, similar to a museum gift shop supporting the museum. The company argues it has delivered on its mission by developing safe AI while attracting necessary capital from Microsoft.
Advertisement
The courtroom drama has drawn intense media attention and public fascination. Demonstrators gathered outside the Oakland courthouse during jury selection, reflecting broader debates about AI ethics, corporate power and Musk’s influence. Givner’s real-time X updates, which included apologies for typos and promises of more notes during breaks, turned the usually opaque legal process into a live-streamed spectacle followed by tech enthusiasts and Musk supporters.
Musk founded xAI in 2023 partly to counter what he sees as OpenAI’s closed, profit-driven direction. He has repeatedly warned that unchecked AI development poses existential risks, a theme he reiterated in testimony. OpenAI maintains it remains committed to safety and has implemented safeguards in models like ChatGPT, while pursuing the resources needed to compete globally.
The stakes extend far beyond personal animosity between former friends Musk and Altman. A ruling in Musk’s favor could force OpenAI to restructure, potentially slowing its momentum or returning valuable IP to the nonprofit. A defense victory would affirm the company’s right to adapt its structure and validate its multibillion-dollar valuation. Either outcome could influence how future AI labs are organized and funded.
Givner, an IP and corporate attorney with experience in fintech and crypto, positioned her thread as neutral live coverage. Her bio notes roles with MonkeDAO and DiversiFi, lending credibility to her detailed legal observations. The thread’s rapid spread underscored X’s role as a primary source for breaking courtroom news in the social media era.
Advertisement
As the trial continues into its second week, both sides prepare for testimony from key figures who shaped OpenAI’s early days. Musk has described himself as a “fool” for continuing to fund the organization after tensions arose, while OpenAI insists he was fully aware of and supported early commercial moves. The jury will ultimately decide whether the shift from nonprofit to for-profit constituted a betrayal or a necessary evolution.
For now, the viral thread from April 28 serves as a time capsule of the trial’s explosive opening, capturing the raw emotions and high principles at stake. Whether Musk’s vision of AI as a public good prevails or OpenAI’s commercial model is upheld, the case has already highlighted the tensions between idealism and pragmatism in the race to build the future’s most powerful technology.
Insperity, Inc. (NSP) Q1 2026 Earnings Call April 30, 2026 5:00 PM EDT
Company Participants
James Allison – Executive VP of Finance, CFO & Treasurer Paul Sarvadi – Co-Founder, Chairman & CEO
Advertisement
Conference Call Participants
Daniel Maxwell – William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division Jeff Martin – ROTH Capital Partners, LLC, Research Division Mark Marcon – Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division Tobey Sommer – Truist Securities, Inc., Research Division Brendan Biles – JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division
Advertisement
Presentation
Operator
Good day. My name is Ali, and I will be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to the Insperity First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] And please note, this conference call is being recorded.
At this time, I would like to introduce today’s speakers. Joining us are Paul Sarvadi, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; and Jim Allison, Executive Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
Advertisement
At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Jim Allison. Mr. Allison, please go ahead.
James Allison Executive VP of Finance, CFO & Treasurer
Thank you. We appreciate you joining us today. Let me begin by outlining our plan for this afternoon’s call. First, I’m going to discuss the details behind our first quarter 2026 financial results. Paul will then comment on 3 strategic initiatives in 2026: Our margin recovery plan, our efforts to rebuild growth momentum, including the HRScale rollout and our AI initiatives. I will return to provide financial guidance for the second quarter and full year 2026. We will then end the call with a question-and-answer session.
Advertisement
Before we begin, I would like to remind you that Paul or I may make forward-looking statements during today’s call, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. In addition, some of our discussion may
Ben Johns comes over to the right side to hit a dink shot against Anna Bright and Hayden Patriquine in the 2026 PPA Carvana Mesa Cup finals match of the Pro Mixed Doubles Division at Arizona Athletic Grounds on February 22, 2026 in Mesa, Arizona.
Bruce Yeung | Getty Images
Pickleball Inc., the new parent company of Major League Pickleball and the PPA Tour, said Friday it has raised a record $225 million in new investment, as the paddle sport continues its rapid growth trajectory.
Advertisement
The latest investment comes from Apollo Global Management’s newly created sports fund, Apollo Sports Capital, and Dundon Capital Partners, owned by billionaire Tom Dundon. Dundon is an owner of the Portland Trail Blazers NBA team and the Carolina Hurricanes NHL team and was an early investor in pickleball.
The fresh funds bring the total investment in Pickleball Inc. to $315 million, as investors continue to look at emerging sports as a place to park their money. The raise values Pickleball Inc. at $750 million, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked to remain unnamed because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the company’s valuation.
The deal also includes rolling up several pickleball assets under the Pickleball Inc. umbrella, creating what the company called the largest pickleball ecosystem to date.
Pickleball Inc. will take on a portfolio of pickleball assets previously owned by Dundon, including Pickleball Central, a leading site for pickleball equipment founded in 2006. The portfolio also includes PickleballTournaments.com, software that powers thousands of tournaments across all levels of play, as well as Just Courts, a pickleball court installer.
Advertisement
Pickleball Inc.’s newly merged business verticals combined generated over $140 million in 2025 revenue, the company said.
In a release, MLP and PPA Tour CEO Connor Pardoe called the new investment a “seismic day” for pickleball’s rapidly growing business at all levels.
“This investment allows us to fully integrate the sport into one cohesive ecosystem – uniting professional pickleball, consumer goods, technology, and media under a single, unified platform,” Pardoe said.
Dundon and the Pardoe family will remain majority shareholders in the business after the investment.
Advertisement
Pickleball has exploded in popularity in recent years, with more than 24 million U.S. players participating in 2025, making it the fastest growing sport in the country over the last three years, according to the Sports & Fitness Industry Association’s Annual Report.
At the professional level, the MLP and PPA Tour have seen major growth with a combined $30 million in sponsorship revenue in 2025 and $60 million in combined top line revenue for 2025, according to the United Pickleball Association, which operates both leagues. The MLP and PPA Tour are projecting $74 million in combined revenue in 2026.
The new capital for Pickleball Inc. will be used to further integrate the pickleball business at all levels of play and create a streamlined pickleball ecosystem, the company said.
“This capital raise will allow us to expand our focus into new and scalable opportunities like content, media, and the development of infrastructure to support our fast growing events,” MLP Commissioner Samin Odhwani said in a statement. “The continued and dynamic year-over-year growth data has proven without doubt that pickleball is no longer an emerging sport, and is instead quickly becoming the next tier one sport in America.”
Advertisement
Get the CNBC Sport newsletter directly to your inbox
The CNBC Sport newsletter with Alex Sherman brings you the biggest news and exclusive interviews from the worlds of sports business and media, delivered weekly to your inbox.
Gold prices were trading almost flat in the international market on Friday, but the yellow metal is on track to record a nearly 2% weekly loss. This comes as oil prices briefly skyrocketed to $126 per barrel, fuelling inflation worries and reinforcing expectations of higher interest rates for longer.
Spot gold prices were steady at around $4,620 per ounce on Friday morning. US gold futures for June delivery rose 0.1% to $4,632.70. This came after gold prices dropped to a one-month low on Wednesday.
Notably, MCX is closed in the morning session today on account of Maharashtra Day. Earlier on Thursday, gold futures with June expiry on the exchange closed around Rs 114 higher at Rs 1,51,225 per 10 grams. The contracts with August expiry also closed marginally higher at Rs 1,54,390 per 10 grams.
Iran-US war
After hitting as high as $126 per barrel on Thursday, oil prices cooled down but continued to remain elevated above $110 per barrel today. This comes as the war between Iran and the US entered its third month, with the Strait of Hormuz continuing to remain choked and keeping investors on edge.
Advertisement
Live Events
US President Donald Trump said that the military blockade of Iranian ports could last for months. A report by Reuters, citing officials, hinted that the US President may be planning a series of fresh military strikes to compel Iran to negotiate an end to the conflict. Iran, meanwhile, said that it would respond with “long and painful strikes” on US positions if Washington renewed its strikes. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei stated that it was not reasonable to expect quick results from US talks, according to the official IRNA news agency. “Expecting to reach a result in a short time, regardless of who the mediator is, in my opinion, is not very realistic,” he was quoted as saying.
What lies ahead?
“In the near term, gold is expected to remain volatile and range-bound, with support near Rs 1,48,000 and resistance around Rs 1,52,000,” said Jateen Trivedi, VP Research Analyst of Commodity and Currency at LKP Securities.
Gold prices fell as oil prices rose, suggesting that the market is fearing increasing inflation and a potential central bank reaction more than rising growth risks, said Carsten Menke, Head Next Generation Research at Julius Baer. “Such short-term and sometimes sharp swings typically mirror moves in the paper market, not the physical market. They are the result of position squaring by speculative futures traders and trend followers, not safe-haven seekers,” he said.
Deutsche Bank, Germany’s leading international investment bank, recently predicted that the bullion’s share in global central bank reserves could increase to 40%, up from around 30% currently. Based on this scenario, the bank’s calculations indicate that gold prices could climb to $8,000 an ounce within five years, implying nearly 80% upside from current levels.
(With inputs from agencies)
Advertisement
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login