Connect with us

Business

Sandisk Surges: Top Industry-Leading Value Stocks

Published

on

Sandisk Surges: Top Industry-Leading Value Stocks

This article was written by

Steven Cress is VP of Quantitative Strategy and Market Data at Seeking Alpha. Steve is also the creator of the platform’s quantitative stock rating system and many of the analytical tools on Seeking Alpha. His contributions form the cornerstone of the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating system, designed to interpret data for investors and offer insights on investment directions, thereby saving valuable time for users. He is also the Founder and Co-Manager of Alpha Picks, a systematic stock recommendation tool designed to help long-term investors create a best-in-class portfolio.Steve is passionate and dedicated to removing emotional biases from investment decisions. Utilizing a data-driven approach, he leverages sophisticated algorithms and technologies to simplify complex, laborious investment research, creating an easy-to-follow, daily updated grading system for stock trading recommendations.Steve was previously the Founder and CEO of CressCap Investment Research until its acquisition by Seeking Alpha in 2018 for its unparalleled quant analysis and market data capabilities. Prior to that, he had also founded the quant hedge fund Cress Capital Management, after spending most of his career running a proprietary trading desk at Morgan Stanley and leading international business development at Northern Trust.With over 30 years of experience in equity research, quantitative strategies, and portfolio management, Steve is well-positioned to speak on a wide range of investment topics.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of SNDK either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given that any particular security, portfolio, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The author is not advising you personally concerning the nature, potential, value or suitability of any particular security or other matter. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. Steven Cress is the Head of Quantitative Strategy at Seeking Alpha. Any views or opinions expressed herein may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Here’s how Tesla FSD, Rivian ‘hands-free’ driving systems compare

Published

on

Here's how Tesla FSD, Rivian ‘hands-free’ driving systems compare

Rivian’s in-vehicle AI assistant launched in its vehicles on May 12, 2026.

Michael Wayland / CNBC

DETROIT — What’s the best advanced driver-assistance system on the market? Ask Rivian Automotive‘s new artificial intelligence and it will say its creator.

Advertisement

“Rivian’s is truly exceptional … an unmatched blend of safety and technology,” the chatbot told me during hourslong drives in one of its R1T pickup trucks in which the vehicle largely controlled itself on several Midwest highways.

While the Rivian AI bot may be biased, that’s exactly the company’s goal with a new generation of vehicle software and technologies: to be the best. Rivian is trying to catch up to — and then surpass — Tesla‘s FSD (Supervised) capabilities, but with additional safety guardrails that the Elon Musk company doesn’t use.

Based on recent drives totaling hundreds of miles, Rivian’s Autonomy+ has surpassed legacy competitors such as General Motors‘ Super Cruise with its ADAS. But it’s still playing catch up to Tesla’s FSD when it comes to nonhighway driving and point-to-point driving, where a vehicle is designed to navigate itself from start to finish. I drove a recent version of FSD (Supervised) v14 to compare the technology.

Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe at the company’s first “Autonomy and AI Day” on Dec. 11, 2025, in Palo Alto, California.

Advertisement

Lora Kolodny | CNBC

Rivian expects to deliver point-to-point driving later this year but, for now, its system is a giant leap forward for the company compared with what it previously offered and is clearly laying the groundwork to better compete with Tesla.

“That’s the next step,” said James Philbin, senior vice president of autonomy and AI at Rivian. “Tesla’s system you use is a point-to-point system. So that that’s the next big leap for us in a way, is getting to that same point-to-point type interaction and that system where it really does the full driving task.”

To be clear, no vehicle on sale today is self-driving or autonomous. Drivers always need to pay attention and be ready to take over. Many advanced driver-assistance systems, or ADAS, can control a vehicle’s speed, braking and steering using cameras, sensors and/or mapping data. An increasing amount of systems allow humans to take their hands off the wheel when in use.

Advertisement

Rivian credits its improvements with its push toward vertical integration that included a new generation of software and electric architecture for its vehicles. It’s just beginning to reap the benefits with its ADAS.

When the steering-wheel light bar illuminates in green with GM’s Super Cruise, drivers may remove their hands from the steering wheel.

Michael Wayland / CNBC

The technologies also are increasingly more important to drivers and investors, which are targeting ADAS as growth markets with recurring revenue for automakers.

Advertisement

“We favor self-reliant (and properly-valued) companies that are building next-gen machines using in-house expertise,” Piper Sandler analyst Alexander Potter said in an investor note upgrading Rivian’s stock last month. “As volume rises, Rivian should be better able to monetize software & services, a key benefit of vertical integration.”

The systems vary in pricing but can be initially included in a vehicle’s purchase or bought via subscriptions. Tesla’s system is currently $99 a month, according to its website. Rivian’s is $49.99 a month or $2,500 to purchase for the lifetime of a vehicle. GM’s is $39.99 a month or $399 a year.

Rivian vs. Tesla

The biggest operational difference between ADAS technologies from Tesla and Rivian is their ability to control the vehicle on nonhighway streets with traffic lights and signs.

Rivian’s system currently detects those roadway signals, but it does not do anything about them other than alert the driver that they are coming. Meanwhile, Tesla’s system handled every signal, interchange and exit ramp I encountered for nearly 200 miles in rural Michigan and downtown Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Advertisement

Rivian’s Autonomy+ system currently detects roadway signals, but it does not do anything about them other than alert the driver that they are coming.

Michael Wayland / CNBC

Based on a decade of experience driving with hands-free ADAS, those two technologies are by far the most advanced. This has not always been the case.

GM, not Tesla, led the development of hands-free highway systems with its Super Cruise, which I initially tested a year before its debut in 2017. But America’s largest automaker was slow to roll it out on new vehicles or significantly grow its capabilities other than expanding geographies and making it able to do lane changes.

Advertisement

Ford Motor also quickly caught up to GM on highways, but both continue to lack systems that are capable of hands-free driving on nonhighways. The two automakers are working on that type of technology, including so-called eyes-off capabilities, but they are not expected until 2028.

It’s a difficult leap, as Tesla’s in-vehicle Grok AI told me during nearly 200 miles of driving in a 2025 Tesla Model Y: “Highways have predictable lanes, speed, fewer pedestrians and clear markings, making sensor fusion and path prediction simpler. City streets bring chaos, intersections, bikes, peds, construction and ambiguous rules that challenge even top AI vision systems.”

Challenging for some more than others. During my drives in the Model Y, the vehicle was essentially controlling itself for multiple hours and dozens of miles without intervention on highway and nonhighway roads.

Tesla FSD (Supervised)

Advertisement

Michael Wayland / CNBC

It somewhat effortlessly handled several traffic circles, also known as roundabouts, and parked for me multiple times when arriving at or near destinations, including parallel parking. It also managed a semitruck blocking half a lane on a two-lane road as well as pretty complex construction zones, with Tesla’s ADAS sensing each barrel or cone.

The Rivian technology handled highway driving very well with no intervention outside of exit ramps and, at times, construction zones. It also isn’t able to change lanes on its own yet, which the company promises is coming soon.

When I asked Rivian about several of my experiences, the company said its vehicles can detect construction objects but it does not always display them on the in-vehicle screen. Its system also still needs assistance in certain locations, such as roundabouts.

Advertisement

Safety concerns remain

All ADAS technologies — except a Mercedes-Benz system in limited circumstances — still need drivers to monitor the systems, even if they can largely control the vehicle without human intervention for hundreds of miles.

With the rise of “hands-off” technology, industry insiders and regular people alike have raised concerns about driver inattentiveness. Automakers have been largely trying to fight that with driver-facing cameras. But concerns remain about the ADAS handover back to a driver as well as on people over-relying on the systems.

YouTube is filled with examples of drivers misusing such systems, particularly Tesla products, as well as videos of ADAS doing human-like moves but also malfunctioning and needing assistance.

A Tesla Model 3 is shown driving on the highway with FSD 14.2.2.3 self-driving supervised software in Irvine, California, U.S., Jan. 28, 2026.

Advertisement

Mike Blake | Reuters

Mike Nelson and CNBC's Rob Ferris take a ride in New York City to test what it's like to use xAI's chatbot Grok in his Tesla.
We tried out xAI’s Grok chatbot while driving a Tesla in NYC. Here’s what happened.

Philbin said it’s those types of circumstances where noncamera technology, including lidar, can better detect potential hazards and objects. My drives were on clear days without any inclement weather.

Still, despite not having many sensors, Tesla’s Grok chatbot — developed by Musk’s xAI, which merged with SpaceX earlier this year — also felt its brand has the superior system, which is true for many driving situations, at least for now.

Advertisement

“Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) is widely rated as the top advanced driver assistance system in 2026 by sources like Motor Trend and others,” Grok AI said. It later added, “Rivian’s AI Assistant is solid for voice controls, navigation, and vehicle features in their R1 vehicles, but it’s still catching up to more advanced systems like ours and full self-driving capabilities.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Continue Reading

Business

Hints And Full Solution For NYT Puzzle 1883 On August 15, 2026 Now Fully Revealed

Published

on

Nancy Guthrie

NEW YORK — Wordle players faced a puzzle Saturday that had many solvers guessing between multiple possible categories before the correct word finally clicked into place, with Wordle No. 1883 leading players through a mix of misdirection tied to air travel, geometry and carpentry themes before the answer became clear.

The word of the day was LOOSE, an adjective or verb describing something that is not firmly fixed, tightly secured or closely controlled, or, in its verb form, to release or set something free from restraint. Hint columns published ahead of the reveal described the word using both of those meanings, guiding solvers toward the answer without spelling it out directly.

Wordle, the daily word-guessing game created by software engineer Josh Wardle in 2021 and later acquired by The New York Times, challenges players to identify a hidden five-letter word within six attempts. After each guess, tiles turn green if a letter is correct and in the right position, yellow if the letter appears elsewhere in the word, and gray if the letter does not appear in the word at all. A new puzzle resets daily at midnight in each player’s local time zone.

Saturday’s word carried a notable letter structure that added to the day’s difficulty for some solvers. LOOSE contains three vowels and two consonants, along with one repeated letter, the double “O” at its center. Puzzle-hint outlets noted that Wordle answers frequently reuse letters, a pattern players are sometimes tempted to rule out too quickly after testing a letter once, and Saturday’s puzzle served as a reminder not to eliminate double letters prematurely when narrowing down possibilities.

Advertisement

Multiple outlets covering Saturday’s puzzle described the overall clue pattern for the day as centered on themes of “connection, teamwork, and smooth handovers,” phrasing commonly used across hint columns to nudge readers toward an answer without revealing it outright. Some players reported racing through the puzzle quickly once they landed on the right letter combination, while others described stumbling through several guesses involving unrelated five-letter words before finally arriving at the correct solution.

Strategy guides published alongside Saturday’s puzzle offered general advice for approaching days when the word proves elusive. Puzzle columnists recommended that solvers avoid clinging too tightly to a single idea if they get stuck, resetting their thinking since the correct word is often simpler than players initially assume. Guides also emphasized watching for common word-ending patterns, such as “-ED,” “-ER” or “-Y,” when filling in remaining blanks, and encouraged players to stay calm during the tension of a sixth and final guess rather than rushing to a decision.

According to NYT WordleBot, the New York Times’ official performance-tracking tool, Saturday’s puzzle produced a range of outcomes among solvers, with some players completing the puzzle in as few as three or four guesses. WordleBot evaluates each player’s individual guesses against optimal strategy, offering a skill and luck rating alongside the broader daily average number of guesses needed to solve the puzzle.

Wordle has grown into one of the most widely played online word games since its public debut in October 2021, spawning a broader suite of daily puzzles under the Times’ games umbrella, including Connections, Strands, the Mini Crossword and Quordle, a more challenging spinoff in which players must solve four five-letter words simultaneously within nine attempts. Millions of players complete some or all of these puzzles each morning as part of a now-familiar daily routine, often tracking personal win streaks that reset if a day’s puzzle is missed entirely.

Advertisement

The Times does not publish official difficulty ratings for individual Wordle puzzles, but third-party trackers analyzing aggregated player data have said Saturday’s puzzle carried moderate difficulty overall, with the word’s structure, particularly its repeated letter and heavy vowel count, cited as the primary source of difficulty for players who struggled with the day’s puzzle.

As with every Wordle puzzle, Saturday’s word will not repeat in future editions, and the game’s archive updates automatically at midnight local time with a new challenge. Players who missed Saturday’s puzzle can still access it, along with every previous day’s puzzle, through Wordle’s official online archive.

Saturday’s puzzle arrived as part of the broader daily slate of New York Times word games, including the standard Connections puzzle, the newer Connections: Sports Edition, and the Mini Crossword, all of which reset at midnight alongside Wordle. For many regular players, completing the full slate of daily puzzles in sequence each morning has become a fixture of their routine, a pattern the Times has continued to cultivate since folding Wordle into its broader games app.

Looking ahead, puzzle enthusiasts can expect Sunday’s Wordle to reset at midnight local time with an entirely new five-letter challenge, continuing a daily cadence that has now stretched across more than 1,800 consecutive puzzles since the game’s original launch.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Morgan Stanley flags four catalysts for SpaceX stock through year-end

Published

on


Morgan Stanley flags four catalysts for SpaceX stock through year-end

Continue Reading

Business

Koppers Is Performing But Is Feeling Input Price Pressure In A Weak Demand Market (KOP)

Published

on

Koppers Is Performing But Is Feeling Input Price Pressure In A Weak Demand Market (KOP)

This article was written by

Long-only investment, evaluating companies from an operational, buy-and-hold perspective.Quipus Capital does not focus on market-driven dynamics and future price action. Instead, our articles focus on operational aspects, understanding the long-term earnings power of companies, the competitive dynamics of the industries where they participate, and buying companies that we would like to hold independently of how the price moves in the future. Most QC calls will be holds, and that is by design. Only a very small fraction of companies should be a buy at any point in time. However, hold articles provide important information for future investors and a healthy dose of skepticism to a relatively bullish-biased market.Disclaimer: All of the author’s articles are written on an “as is” basis and without warranty. They represent the author’s opinion only and in no way constitute professional investment advice. It is the responsibility of the reader to conduct their due diligence and seek investment advice from a licensed professional before making any investment decisions. The author disclaims all liability for any actions taken based on the information contained in any articles published.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial short position in the shares of KOP either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Millions of Americans stay in unwanted jobs to keep health coverage: survey

Published

on

Millions of Americans stay in unwanted jobs to keep health coverage: survey

Nearly one in four American workers with employer-sponsored health insurance say they are stuck in jobs they want to leave because they fear losing coverage.

About 24% of U.S. workers with job-based insurance – roughly 23 million adults – are experiencing “job lock,” up sharply from 16% in 2021, according to a report from the West Health-Gallup Center on Healthcare in America.

Advertisement

The survey defines job lock as remaining in a job despite wanting to leave due to concerns about losing health insurance.

Employees sit at a table during a corporate meeting.

Nearly one in four American workers with employer-sponsored health insurance say they are stuck in jobs they want to leave because they fear losing coverage. (iStock)

“Job lock is on the rise in America,” the report noted. “Nearly a quarter of U.S. employees report staying in a job they want to leave to keep their health insurance, a powerful constraint on worker mobility, productivity, entrepreneurship and wage growth.”

The surge comes as soaring healthcare costs squeeze household budgets. 

About half of Americans said they struggle to consistently pay for needed medical care or prescriptions, while 51% are worried about affording healthcare over the next year — the highest level in five years, as noted in the report.

Advertisement

OBAMACARE EXCHANGE FLAW EXPOSED AMERICANS TO UNEXPECTED HEALTH PLAN SWITCHES, WATCHDOG FINDS

Laid off employee worker company

The survey defines job lock as remaining in a job despite wanting to leave due to concerns about losing health insurance. (iStock)

Workers under greater financial strain were far more likely to report feeling trapped.

Among those with medical debt, 44% reported job lock, more than double the 21% rate among those without medical debt.

ALLERGY MEDICATION RECALLED OVER POSSIBLE DRUG MIX-UP THAT COULD TRIGGER ‘LIFE-THREATENING’ REACTIONS

Advertisement
Business people crossing Fulton Street

Workers under greater financial strain were far more likely to report feeling trapped. (iStock)

Nearly half of respondents who cited healthcare costs as a “major financial burden” reported job lock. The rate rose to 53% among those experiencing “a lot of stress” over medical expenses, the report noted.

Chronic health problems also made workers more likely to stay at their jobs. 

About 29% of those with at least one chronic condition reported job lock, compared with 17% of those without one.

That rate grew to 41% among people with three or more diagnoses.

Advertisement

TRUMP’S FIRST-TERM POLICIES HELPED LOWER SOME INSULIN COSTS: HHS REPORT

Doctor hands writing on paper or document at a desk in the hospital.

Chronic health problems also made workers more likely to stay at their jobs. (iStock)

Women were also more likely than men to remain in unwanted jobs for health benefits, at 30% compared with 20%, according to the report.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The findings were based on a national survey of 5,660 adults conducted from Oct. 27 to Dec. 22, 2025. The analysis focused on 2,322 employed adults with employer-sponsored insurance.

Advertisement

“The effects extend beyond morale – reducing labor market efficiency, upward mobility and quality of life,” as noted in the report. “With coverage tied to employment, a growing share of American workers report making career decisions based on insurance rather than opportunity.”

Continue Reading

Business

Marvel Unveils X-Men Cast at D23 With Adam Driver as Mister Sinister for May 2028 Release

Published

on

Christopher Abbott

ANAHEIM, Calif. — Marvel Studios formally introduced the principal cast of its long-awaited X-Men film and locked in a theatrical release date of May 5, 2028, during Disney’s D23 event on Friday.

Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige presented the ensemble on stage at the Honda Center. Sadie Sink will play Jean Grey, Kit Connor is Cyclops, Christopher Abbott portrays Professor Charles Xavier, Samara Weaving takes on Emma Frost, Inde Navarrette stars as Rogue and Maya Boyd is Storm. Adam Driver joins as Nathaniel Milbury, the identity associated with the villain Mister Sinister.

Driver appeared via video from Pinewood Studios rather than in person. In the message he referenced long-running discussions with Feige about joining the Marvel Cinematic Universe. “Kevin and I have been talking for years about me joining the MCU,” Driver said. “Now I feel like we’ve found the perfect film, at the perfect time, with characters I care deeply about.”

He briefly joked about playing Magneto before correcting himself and confirming the role of Nathaniel Milbury. Additional remarks captured in coverage of the presentation included: “When Kevin told me to show up for X-Men, I assumed he meant on set. So instead of being there in California, I’m here at Pinewood on this very lonely soundstage. … So I’m very excited to be playing Mag…. Nope. Even better. Nathaniel Milbury. So I’ll be right here, waiting for everybody to show up.”

Advertisement

Feige noted that several of the actors had only just met backstage before walking out together. Sink’s casting as Jean Grey had already been established through her appearance in the recent Spider-Man film Brand New Day. Connor’s role as Cyclops and Weaving’s as Emma Frost had been reported in the days leading up to the event and were confirmed on stage.

Jake Schreier, who previously directed Thunderbolts*, is helming the project. Lee Sung Jin, creator of the series Beef, and Joanna Calo, a writer and co-showrunner associated with The Bear and a collaborator on Thunderbolts*, are among the writers developing the screenplay. Michael Lesslie had earlier been attached to an earlier draft.

The announcement marks a significant step in integrating the X-Men into the main MCU timeline following Disney’s 2019 acquisition of 20th Century Fox and its Marvel film library. Previous live-action versions of the characters appeared in a series of Fox films that began with X-Men in 2000 and featured actors including Patrick Stewart and James McAvoy as Professor X, Ian McKellen and Michael Fassbender as Magneto, Halle Berry as Storm, and Famke Janssen and Sophie Turner as Jean Grey. Stewart is set to appear again as Professor X in the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday, scheduled for December.

The new film is positioned to arrive after Avengers: Secret Wars, which is expected to conclude the current Multiverse Saga. Marvel has indicated the X-Men project will emphasize character-driven storytelling and the interpersonal dynamics that defined classic comic runs, particularly the work of writer Chris Claremont. Schreier and the writing team have spoken in earlier interviews about focusing on personal stakes and the experience of feeling different or marginalized, themes long associated with the mutant characters.

Advertisement

Abbott, known for roles in Girls, Poor Things and the upcoming East of Eden series, steps into the role of the telepathic founder and leader of the X-Men. Boyd, who has Broadway credits including & Juliet, takes on Storm, the weather-controlling mutant previously played by Berry. Navarrette, who gained attention in the recent series Obsession, will portray Rogue, whose power involves absorbing the abilities and memories of others through touch. Connor, recognized from Heartstopper, becomes the optic-blast-wielding field leader Cyclops. Weaving, of Ready or Not, plays the diamond-skinned telepath Emma Frost. Sink continues as the powerful telepath and telekinetic Jean Grey after her introduction in Brand New Day.

Driver’s casting as Mister Sinister brings a classic X-Men antagonist into the MCU for the first time in a major live-action capacity. The character, a geneticist and long-running foe of the team, has appeared in comics for decades under various aliases, including Nathaniel Essex and Nathaniel Milbury.

Casting for the film had been underway for months, with final rounds of testing reported after the Fourth of July holiday. The process drew widespread attention as Marvel assembled a new generation of actors for the property that once ranked among Fox’s most consistent performers at the box office.

The May 5, 2028, date places the movie nearly two decades after the MCU’s launch with Iron Man in 2008. It also positions the film as an early entry in whatever phase follows the Multiverse Saga. Additional casting and story details have not been disclosed. Filming has not yet begun, though Sink has indicated in recent interviews that production on the X-Men project is expected in the near term.

Advertisement

The D23 presentation drew strong reactions from attendees and online audiences following the formal unveiling. The combination of established names such as Driver and Sink with newer faces including Navarrette and Boyd reflects Marvel’s approach of blending recognizable talent with emerging performers for the mutant team.

Further announcements regarding supporting roles, additional mutants or connections to existing MCU storylines are expected in the coming months as development continues under Schreier and the writing team. The film remains untitled beyond its X-Men branding at this stage.

Marvel Studios is owned by The Walt Disney Company. The D23 event continues through the weekend in Anaheim with additional presentations on other Disney properties.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Feeling ‘Really Grateful’ As Newlyweds, Insider Tells People

Published

on

Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce, Alysa Liu Steal Spotlight at 2026

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are settling into married life with a strong sense of gratitude, according to a source close to the couple who spoke with People magazine, as the pair gradually returns to public view following their wedding last month.

Swift and Kelce were married July 3 at New York’s Madison Square Garden in front of more than 1,000 guests, capping a relationship that began publicly in 2023 and led to their engagement in August 2025. The couple spent much of their first month as husband and wife largely out of the public eye before slowly stepping back into view in recent weeks.

According to the source who spoke with People, both Swift and Kelce feel deeply appreciative of where they currently find themselves in life, describing the pair as excited to begin this new chapter of their relationship together. The insider said their bond has taken on added significance since the ceremony, and that the couple remains focused on their respective careers and creative pursuits while continuing to find genuine joy in the life they have built together.

Kelce broke his own public silence on the wedding for the first time August 12, during a press conference at the Kansas City Chiefs’ training camp. Asked about the ceremony more than a month after it took place, Kelce did not hold back his enthusiasm. “The wedding was the best night of my life,” Kelce told reporters, thanking everyone who traveled to celebrate with the couple and describing the evening as a “crazy night” filled with celebration.

Advertisement

Kelce also reflected on the personal significance of getting married inside Madison Square Garden, a venue he described as holding deep meaning given its status within professional sports. He recalled having told himself for years that he would eventually attend a Knicks playoff game at the arena, only to have Swift make it to a game during this year’s NBA Finals while he remained tied up at Chiefs minicamp. Getting the chance to be married inside what he called the sport’s most storied venue, he said, made the occasion feel like the fulfillment of a childhood dream. Kelce also offered a lighter aside about the venue, joking that the air conditioning inside the arena was one of the best parts of the entire night.

Swift, for her part, has not publicly commented on the wedding itself. She has, however, spoken warmly about Kelce in the past, including during an October 2025 appearance on “The Tonight Show,” where she told host Jimmy Fallon that Kelce was the favorite person she had ever met, and that the idea of getting to spend every day with him felt like everything she could want.

Vogue reported that wedding planner Mark Seed organized the July 3 ceremony, which drew an estimated 1,100 guests and reportedly followed a “secret garden” theme, a detail that aligned with the setting Kelce chose for his marriage proposal to Swift the previous summer. Sources previously told NBC News that both Swift and Kelce wore white and that each wrote their own vows for the ceremony. Kelce’s sister-in-law, Kylie Kelce, has also shared some details from the event, saying that his brother, former NFL center Jason Kelce, was moved to tears during the ceremony, possibly more than Kylie herself cried at her own wedding.

Since the wedding, Swift has made limited public appearances. She was photographed in London in August debuting a notably different hairstyle, one of her first widely noted public appearances since the ceremony. Beyond that, neither Swift nor Kelce has released any joint statement or given a joint interview addressing their new life as a married couple, leaving most public detail about their post-wedding life to come through separate individual appearances and secondhand accounts from people close to them.

Advertisement

At the same Chiefs press conference where he addressed the wedding, Kelce also made clear his attention has already shifted back toward football as he enters his 14th NFL season. Chiefs head coach Andy Reid separately dismissed any suggestion that the offseason wedding and surrounding attention had affected Kelce’s preparation, telling reporters the veteran tight end remains as focused, fit and driven as ever heading into training camp.

With Swift continuing her music career and Kelce returning to preseason preparation with the Chiefs, the couple appears to be settling into a routine that balances their individual professional demands with the new chapter they’ve entered as a married couple, even as both have largely kept the more personal details of their post-wedding life private for now.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s 2024 grocery photo op now haunts Republicans in the midterms

Published

on


Trump’s 2024 grocery photo op now haunts Republicans in the midterms

Continue Reading

Business

CoreWeave Stock Buy or Sell Debate Intensifies in 2026 After Q2 Beat and $104 Billion Backlog

Published

on

CoreWeave Stock Jumps 9% as Massive Meta and Anthropic AI

CoreWeave Inc. shares closed at $105.26 on Aug. 14, 2026, after a volatile week that followed the company’s second-quarter results, leaving investors and analysts divided on whether the artificial intelligence infrastructure provider remains a buy or has become overextended.

The Livingston, New Jersey-based company reported revenue of $2.58 billion for the three months ended June 30, more than double the $1.21 billion recorded a year earlier and slightly above Wall Street expectations. Adjusted operating income reached $128 million, while the net loss widened to $626 million, or $1.14 per share, largely because of higher interest expenses tied to aggressive expansion financing. Management raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance to a range of $12.4 billion to $13.2 billion and projected adjusted operating income between $960 million and $1.15 billion.

Revenue backlog stood at approximately $104 billion at the end of the second quarter. The company said more than $25 billion in additional net new customer commitments were secured in the early weeks of the third quarter. Active power capacity continued to ramp, with the firm highlighting strong demand from AI laboratories, hyperscalers and enterprise customers.

In its earnings release, CoreWeave stated: “CoreWeave is built on the conviction that AI is foundational to every industry and that realizing its full potential requires a purpose-built platform. This quarter reinforced that conviction.”

Advertisement

Wall Street’s reaction has been broadly constructive though not unanimous. Across major tracking services, the consensus rating sits at Buy or Moderate Buy / Outperform. Roughly two dozen to three dozen analysts cover the stock. The majority assign Buy or equivalent ratings, with a smaller group recommending Hold and a handful issuing Sell or Underperform ratings. The average 12-month price target clusters between roughly $137 and $143, implying potential upside of about 30% to 36% from the mid-August closing level. Individual targets range widely, from lows near $39–$74 to highs of $250–$303.

Recent actions have skewed positive. Citigroup maintained a Buy rating and lifted its target to $159. Truist Securities raised its target to $155 while keeping a Buy. Piper Sandler reiterated an Overweight rating and moved its target to $153. Wells Fargo, Cantor Fitzgerald, Rosenblatt Securities and others also raised or reaffirmed constructive views with elevated targets. Some firms, including Barclays, maintained Equal-Weight or Hold ratings with more modest targets near the current share price. A minority of analysts remain cautious, citing valuation, debt levels and execution risks.

CoreWeave went public in 2025 and has positioned itself as a specialized provider of GPU-accelerated cloud infrastructure optimized for AI training and inference workloads. Its growth has tracked the broader surge in generative AI spending. Capital expenditures remain elevated; second-quarter outlays reached $9.4 billion, and full-year guidance was lifted to a range of $35 billion to $39 billion as the company races to add power capacity and data-center footprint. Management has indicated plans to reach at least 8 gigawatts of power by 2030.

The balance sheet reflects the cost of that expansion. Interest expense more than doubled year over year in the second quarter to $640 million. Debt facilities, including recently arranged delayed-draw term loans, support the buildout but weigh on near-term profitability. Adjusted EBITDA margins remained robust near 59%, yet GAAP losses persist and the path to consistent positive net income is still measured in years rather than quarters, according to company projections and analyst models that see meaningful earnings scale later in the decade.

Advertisement

Supporters of the stock point to the size and quality of the contracted backlog, the diversification of customers beyond the largest AI labs, early signs of pricing power and the sequential improvement in adjusted operating income. They note that more than three-quarters of projected 2027 annualized revenue is already under contract in some estimates, providing visibility rare among high-growth technology companies. Year-to-date through mid-August the shares had gained nearly 47%.

Skeptics focus on the capital intensity of the business, the risk that AI infrastructure spending could moderate, competition from hyperscale cloud providers and the potential for interest rates or financing conditions to pressure margins. Valuation multiples remain elevated relative to traditional software or infrastructure peers when measured against current earnings, though they compress significantly when compared with longer-term revenue and free-cash-flow forecasts. Insider selling through planned programs has also drawn occasional comment.

The third-quarter outlook calls for revenue of $3.4 billion to $3.6 billion. Management has described the current period as an inflection in which scale begins to translate more clearly into operating leverage. Whether that trajectory materializes on schedule will likely determine the next major re-rating of the shares.

As of mid-August 2026 the debate remains open. A clear majority of covering analysts rate CoreWeave a buy and project meaningful upside over the coming year, citing durable AI demand and a substantial contracted backlog. A smaller group urges caution or recommends selling, emphasizing the risks of heavy leverage, elevated capital spending and valuation. The stock’s performance for the remainder of 2026 will hinge on execution against the raised guidance, further backlog conversion and the broader health of enterprise and research AI budgets.

Advertisement

Investors evaluating the name must weigh the company’s demonstrated ability to capture AI infrastructure demand against the financial and operational challenges of scaling a capital-intensive platform at this speed. The latest quarterly results and analyst target revisions have reinforced the bullish case for many, yet the wide dispersion of price targets underscores that outcomes remain highly sensitive to delivery on the multiyear growth plan.

Continue Reading

Business

Univest financial director Turner sells $344,280 in shares

Published

on


Univest financial director Turner sells $344,280 in shares

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025