Business
Southeast Asia Startup Funding Hits $5.4 Billion in 2025
Southeast Asia’s venture ecosystem closed 2025 with US$5.4 billion raised across 461 deals, according to the Southeast Asia Startup Funding Report: Full Year 2025. This marked a slight decline compared to the previous year, reflecting a more cautious investment environment.
Key takeaways
- Southeast Asia’s venture funding reached US$5.4 billion in 2025, but deal count hit a six-year low, exposing a market driven by a few megadeals rather than broad investor confidence.
- Singapore captured 91% of all regional capital, cementing its position as the undisputed funding hub while Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines continued to lose ground.
- The market has stabilised rather than recovered, with tighter valuations, selective late-stage bets, and a persistent exit bottleneck keeping a full rebound out of reach heading into 2026.
Despite the drop, the region continued to demonstrate resilience, with fintech, e-commerce, and healthtech leading the way in attracting investor interest. Notable deals included several late-stage funding rounds and the emergence of new unicorns, signaling sustained growth potential in the ecosystem.
The annual deal count ranked among the lowest in more than six years, and the headline figure was rescued largely by a handful of outsized late-stage transactions rather than any broad-based revival.
A Year That Broke in Two
The first half was historically weak. Equity investment dropped 20.7% year-on-year to US$1.85 billion across 229 transactions, both figures representing six-year lows.
The second half reversed course sharply, delivering US$3.51 billion as late-stage deal flow more than doubled from 10 transactions to 24. Even so, analysts cautioned that the rebound was narrow.
“There is confidence returning to the market, but it is a quieter, more thoughtful kind,” said Minette Navarrete, President and Managing Partner of Kickstart Ventures.
“It creates the conditions for a more resilient and sustainable next growth cycle, rather than a premature rebound driven by excess risk-taking.”
Singapore Commands 91% of Regional Capital
Singapore tightened its dominance, accounting for over 60% of the regional deal count and 91% of the total capital deployed.
Three transactions alone defined much of the year: Princeton Digital Group closed a US$1.3 billion Series C, Digital Edge raised US$640 million, and Airwallex secured US$330 million in a Series G round.
Outside Singapore, the picture darkened. Indonesia remained flat after a prolonged slowdown. Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines all saw deal volumes weaken in the second half. The Philippines drew just US$120 million for the full year, trailing most regional peers.
Sectors in Shift
Fintech led by deal count with 111 transactions worth US$1.3 billion, but delivered one of its weakest annual results in six years. Healthtech rebounded strongly with 35 deals totalling US$393 million, lifted by UltraGreen.ai’s US$188 million funding round.
The surgical imaging company was later listed on the Singapore Exchange, raising over US$400 million. Green tech held steady as the second most active sector, while e-commerce continued to lose ground.
Four New Unicorns
The region minted four new unicorns in 2025, up sharply from one in 2024. Notable additions included Malaysian group Ashita, Singapore-based payments firm Thunes, digital asset bank Sygnum, and UltraGreen.ai. Southeast Asia now counts 58 unicorn-status companies.
The Exit Problem
Despite the uptick, structural headwinds remain. Exit activity slowed, with only 57 acquisitions recorded and 15 tech IPOs completed for the year. Edgar Hardless, CEO of Singtel Innov8, said the lack of exits was the single biggest drag on investor confidence. “High valuations in the past few years have made it harder for startups to find local acquirers,” he said, adding that he expects caution to persist into the first half of 2026.
The report concludes that Southeast Asia’s venture market has found a functional floor rather than a launchpad. Capital deployment is more disciplined, valuations are tighter, and founders face higher bars on efficiency and governance.