WASHINGTON — Two protesters were removed from a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on March 3, 2026, as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem testified for the first time since the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens during federal immigration operations in Minneapolis sparked widespread outrage and calls to reform or abolish ICE.

The disruptions occurred during Noem’s oversight appearance before the committee, chaired by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, with ranking Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois leading questioning. The session focused on the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda, DHS funding amid a partial shutdown threat, heightened border security measures and the deadly incidents in Minnesota that have galvanized opposition to aggressive enforcement tactics.

The first interruption came moments before Noem delivered her opening statement. As she was sworn in and prompted by Grassley, a protester stood and shouted, “Kristi Noem, you should be ashamed of yourself!” and “Abolish ICE!” Capitol Police officers quickly escorted the individual from the room. Video footage shared by Fox News, APT and other outlets captured the brief chaos, with the demonstrator yelling as they were led out.

A second protester was removed shortly after, during questioning by Durbin. As the senator pressed Noem on accountability for deaths caused by immigration agents, the individual rose and shouted about “Americans killed by ICE” and accused Noem of failing to deliver justice to grieving families. The protester was swiftly removed, allowing the hearing to resume without significant delay.

Noem, the former South Dakota governor confirmed as DHS secretary in early 2026, defended the department’s actions in her prepared remarks. She touted “historic results” under President Donald Trump’s second term, including record deportations, enhanced border security and efforts to combat threats from Iran amid ongoing military operations. She described the Minneapolis incidents as tragic but emphasized that officers faced threats and that enforcement operations target criminal activity, not peaceful protesters.

The deaths involve Renee Good, shot by an ICE officer on Jan. 7, 2026, during what DHS described as a routine enforcement action, and Alex Pretti, killed on Jan. 24 by Customs and Border Protection officers while filming operations. Both were U.S. citizens, fueling protests in Minnesota and demands from local leaders for DHS to halt operations in the state. DHS has denied wrongdoing, stating agents acted in self-defense or under threat, though investigations continue.

Grassley acknowledged “mistakes have been made” in interactions but stressed the difference between protected speech and obstruction, noting officers should not face harm while enforcing laws. Durbin pressed Noem on transparency, use of force policies and whether the administration’s rhetoric contributed to a “hateful America,” accusations Noem rejected as mischaracterizations of lawful enforcement.

The hearing unfolded against broader tensions: a partial DHS funding lapse, resistance to mass deportations and the ongoing U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran that have heightened homeland security alerts. Noem highlighted border successes and threats from foreign adversaries, but Democrats focused on civilian casualties and civil rights concerns.

Social media amplified the disruptions, with clips from Fox News, NBC News and The Independent circulating widely. Reactions split along partisan lines: supporters praised Noem’s composure and called protesters disruptive, while critics hailed the interruptions as necessary accountability for what they termed excessive force.

Capitol Police handled the removals efficiently, with no arrests reported as of late afternoon March 3. Such outbursts are common in high-profile hearings on immigration, echoing past disruptions during debates over border policy.

Noem’s testimony marked her first major congressional appearance since confirmation, following limited December questioning. The session continued into the afternoon with exchanges on funding, Iran-related threats and immigration enforcement protocols.

As the hearing progressed, attention shifted to policy questions, but the early protests underscored deep divisions over the Trump administration’s immigration agenda and its human costs. Noem maintained that DHS prioritizes safety and rule of law, while opponents demanded reforms to prevent future tragedies.

The committee plans follow-up sessions if needed, with potential votes on DHS appropriations looming amid the funding impasse.

WASHINGTON — The joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran, dubbed Operation Epic Fury by the United States and Operation Roaring Lion by Israel, has featured an extensive array of fighter jets since strikes began Feb. 28, 2026. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have employed fifth-generation stealth fighters, fourth-generation multirole aircraft and electronic warfare platforms to achieve air superiority, suppress defenses and conduct precision strikes on Iranian ballistic missile sites, command centers, air defenses and naval assets.

As of March 4, 2026, more than 1,250 targets have been hit in Iran during the operation’s first week, with fighter jets playing a central role alongside long-range bombers like the B-2 Spirit and B-1B Lancer. The campaign has involved coordinated waves of aircraft from U.S. carriers in the Arabian Sea and Mediterranean, forward-deployed bases in the Middle East, and direct missions from the United States.

Here are the primary fighter jets confirmed in use during the strikes, based on CENTCOM releases, IDF statements and open-source reporting:

1. **F-35 Lightning II (U.S. and Israel)** — The fifth-generation stealth multirole fighter has been a cornerstone of operations. U.S. Air Force F-35As from the 48th Fighter Wing at RAF Lakenheath and Vermont Air National Guard, plus Marine Corps F-35Cs from the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, conducted strikes and suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD). Israel deployed its F-35I Adir variant — known as “Mighty One” — in large numbers, with reports of up to 670 sorties targeting missile systems and leadership. The F-35’s low observability enabled initial penetrations against Iranian radars.

2. **F-22 Raptor (U.S.)** — About a dozen F-22s from Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., deployed to Israel ahead of the operation, marking the first combat deployment there. Additional Raptors went to RAF Lakenheath. As air superiority fighters, they escorted strike packages, engaged potential air threats and maintained dominance over Iranian airspace. CENTCOM photos showed F-22s in theater by late February.

3. **F-15 Variants (U.S. and Israel)** — U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles provided multirole strike capability, though three were lost to friendly fire over Kuwait on March 2. Israel used F-15s to launch standoff missiles, including Black Sparrow air-launched ballistic missiles, against deep targets. The F-15’s range and payload supported extended missions.

4. **F-16 Fighting Falcon (U.S. and Israel)** — Dozens of U.S. F-16s, including Wild Weasel variants for SEAD, operated from regional bases. Israel’s F-16s contributed to the initial wave destroying air defenses in western Iran. The multirole fighter’s versatility aided in precision strikes and drone intercepts.

5. **F/A-18 Super Hornet (U.S. Navy/Marines)** — Carrier-based F/A-18E/Fs from the USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Gerald R. Ford launched with heavy loads, including AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapons. Video from CENTCOM showed Super Hornets taking off for strikes. The platform’s flexibility supported naval integration in the Gulf.

6. **EA-18G Growler (U.S. Navy)** — Electronic attack variants jammed Iranian radars and communications, suppressing defenses during strike waves. Growlers, based on the F/A-18, operated from carriers and provided critical electronic warfare support.

Israeli Air Force operations involved 200-300 fighter jets in the opening hours, establishing air supremacy over Tehran and western Iran. The IDF claimed strikes on hundreds of targets, including missile launchers and command sites, with fighter jets operating with impunity after neutralizing defenses.

U.S. forces amassed about 30 F-35s in the region pre-operation, alongside F-22s, F-15Es and F-16s. Carrier strike groups provided additional F/A-18s and Growlers. Support aircraft like E-3 Sentry AWACS, P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol and KC-135 tankers enabled long-range missions, while MQ-9 Reapers and new LUCAS one-way attack drones supplemented strikes.

The campaign’s air component has drawn from lessons of prior operations, emphasizing stealth, standoff weapons and electronic warfare to minimize risk. Iranian retaliation — including ballistic missiles and drones — has been intercepted by Patriot, THAAD and fighter patrols, though incidents like the F-15 losses highlight operational hazards.

As strikes continue into the second week, fighter jets remain pivotal in maintaining pressure on Iranian capabilities while U.S. officials signal operations could extend weeks. The mix of platforms underscores the integrated, multi-domain approach defining modern air campaigns.