A months-old video of Kate Middleton has resurfaced online with a misleading new caption, prompting a wave of criticism from royal watchers who say the clip has been stripped of its original context to suggest something it does not show.

The video was shared this week on X by an account belonging to Matt Wallace, which has more than two million followers. The post described the footage as showing the Princess of Wales “caught sneaking out the back door in all red,” adding that she “looks extremely nervous after she sees the camera.” The characterization quickly drew backlash from supporters of the Princess of Wales, who pointed out that the footage was neither new nor evidence of anything unusual.

Where the video actually came from

The clip did not originate this week. It first circulated in January, when the Princess of Wales was filmed during a rainy Changing of the Guard ceremony at Windsor Castle. In the footage, Middleton is seen hurrying across the castle grounds while holding an umbrella alongside an aide, dressed in a crimson outfit.

That red ensemble was not incidental. Middleton had worn it earlier the same day for a reception at Windsor Castle honoring England’s Women’s Rugby team, known as the Red Roses, following their World Cup victory. As patron of the Rugby Football Union, Middleton hosted the squad at the castle to celebrate their championship win, which came after England defeated Canada in the tournament final the previous September.

Video and photos from the reception itself showed a relaxed, engaged Middleton greeting players and posing with the World Cup trophy, dressed in the same red suit later seen in the misleadingly captioned clip. The rainy footage that circulated this week appears to capture her departure from the event, dashing across a courtyard to avoid the weather — a mundane moment recast online as something more dramatic.

A pattern of scrutiny

The episode is the latest example of a recurring dynamic surrounding Middleton’s public appearances, in which routine footage is reinterpreted and recirculated with dramatic or suspicious framing, often stripped of the context that explains it. Members of the public and royal commentators responding to the post noted that the video showed nothing more than the princess trying to stay dry, not a covert exit or a nervous reaction to being filmed.

Momentum around the clip built quickly given the size of the account that shared it. Accounts with large followings on X have periodically found renewed traffic recirculating older royal footage under new or misleading captions, a trend that has previously affected Middleton’s public image, particularly following a period last year when her public appearances were more limited during medical treatment. That earlier period fueled a wave of unverified claims and conspiracy theories about her whereabouts and health, several of which were later shown to be false or based on manipulated or misread images and footage.

Royal engagements continue as scheduled

Middleton has remained an active presence in her official role since the January reception, with Kensington Palace continuing to document her engagements through official channels, including social media posts marking events like the rugby reception itself. At the time, the palace shared images from the Windsor Castle gathering, describing it as a celebration of the Red Roses’ championship run.

The rugby reception marked one of Middleton’s early public engagements of the year and came shortly after a joint appearance with Prince William earlier the same month, their first public outing together since the previous Christmas. The pairing of engagements signaled a return to a fuller public schedule after a period of reduced appearances.

Why the claim spread

Misleading captions attached to genuine footage tend to spread differently than fabricated images or synthetic video, since the underlying visual material is real and can appear more credible at first glance. In this case, the video itself was authentic footage of Middleton at a legitimate royal engagement; the misrepresentation came entirely from the added narrative framing, which implied secrecy or distress where public records and prior reporting show neither.

Royal commentators and fans responding to the post highlighted the discrepancy between the caption and the documented record of the day, noting that the event itself, the outfit, the setting and the reason for Middleton’s brisk pace across the courtyard were all previously reported and photographed in detail at the time.

The broader context

The recirculation reflects a wider pattern in how royal-related content moves across social media platforms, where video clips can be detached from their original reporting and reframed to generate engagement, regardless of the accuracy of the accompanying claims. Large accounts with global followings can amplify such reframed content rapidly, often reaching audiences unfamiliar with the original event the footage depicted.

For Middleton specifically, the pattern has repeated periodically over the past two years, with various photos and videos drawing outsized scrutiny and speculative commentary before being clarified by contemporaneous reporting, official palace statements, or additional footage from the same events. This week’s episode follows that same arc: an old clip, a new and inaccurate caption, and a swift public correction from those familiar with the original context.

As of publication, there was no indication that Kensington Palace had issued a direct response to the specific post questioned this week. The palace has generally declined to comment on individual pieces of viral social media content involving the Princess of Wales, instead continuing to document her official engagements through its own channels.

The episode adds to an ongoing conversation about how quickly authentic but recontextualized footage can spread online, and how difficult it can be for accurate context to catch up once a misleading caption has already reached a large audience.

Shoppers weighing their next smartphone purchase this summer face an unusual comparison: one device that just went on sale and another that Apple has not yet announced. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 debuted this week at Galaxy Unpacked in London, while Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro Max remains a rumored product expected to arrive in September. Here’s what is confirmed, what is still speculation, and what that means for anyone deciding between the two.

The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is real, priced and dated

Samsung unveiled the Galaxy Z Fold 8 on July 22 alongside two companion foldables, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and the Galaxy Z Flip 8, marking the first time the company has launched three book-style and clamshell foldables at a single event. The Z Fold 8 introduces a new “wide” form factor, shorter and wider than previous Fold models, designed to feel more like a standard phone when closed while opening into a broader, more landscape-oriented display for multitasking and media.

Pricing starts at $1,899.99 for the Z Fold 8, while the more traditional tall-format Z Fold 8 Ultra — the direct successor to last year’s Z Fold 7 — starts at $2,099. Samsung says the Fold 8 Ultra measures just 4.1 millimeters thick when unfolded and weighs 215 grams, which the company describes as the thinnest Galaxy Z Fold to date. Both phones opened for preorder the day of the announcement and go on general sale August 5.

Samsung’s newsroom described the Ultra branding as representing the company’s highest tier of performance and user experience within the Galaxy foldable lineup, a designation the company has not previously applied to a Fold-series device.

The iPhone 18 Pro Max exists only in leaks and supply-chain reports

Apple has made no official statements about the iPhone 18 Pro Max. Everything currently circulating — chip details, display size, camera configuration and price — comes from analyst notes, leaked component specifications and supply-chain sourcing rather than confirmed company information. That distinction matters for anyone trying to compare the two devices today: one has a verified price and ship date, and the other does not exist yet as a retail product.

Based on the leaks, the iPhone 18 Pro Max is expected to launch in September alongside the standard iPhone 18 Pro and, notably, Apple’s first foldable phone. Reports suggest Apple is breaking from its usual pattern by launching only its premium lineup this fall — the 18 Pro, 18 Pro Max and the foldable — while pushing the standard iPhone 18 and a budget iPhone 18e to spring 2027. If accurate, that would leave fall 2026 shoppers choosing exclusively among devices starting at $999 or more, with no lower-cost new iPhone available until the following year.

Rumored specifications point to Apple’s next-generation A20 Pro chip built on a 2-nanometer process, a roughly 6.9-inch display, and a triple 48-megapixel rear camera system. Price estimates vary by source, with some pointing to a Pro Max starting price in the $1,199 to $1,399 range, up from the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s $1,199 starting price last year.

A fundamentally different kind of device

The comparison itself blends two very different product categories. The iPhone 18 Pro Max, as rumored, is a conventional slab smartphone built around Apple’s established Pro design language, incremental camera improvements and a faster chip — the kind of yearly refinement Apple has offered across the Pro line for several generations. The Galaxy Z Fold 8, by contrast, is a foldable device built around a large inner display that opens like a small tablet, aimed at buyers who want more screen real estate for multitasking, note-taking or media consumption in a single pocketable device.

That difference means the decision often comes down less to raw specifications and more to how someone plans to use the phone. Buyers who want a familiar phone shape, a mature camera system and Apple’s software ecosystem are typically better served waiting for the iPhone 18 Pro Max. Buyers interested in a larger working canvas, split-screen multitasking or the novelty and utility of a folding display — and who are comfortable paying a premium for it — are the more natural audience for the Z Fold 8 or its pricier Ultra sibling.

Price is not close

Even using the more conservative iPhone 18 Pro Max price estimates, Samsung’s foldables cost significantly more. The Z Fold 8 starts nearly $600 to $700 above the rumored iPhone 18 Pro Max starting price, and the Fold 8 Ultra pushes that gap even further. For buyers primarily driven by cost, that price difference alone may settle the decision before specifications are even considered.

Timing complicates any immediate decision

Because the iPhone 18 Pro Max has not launched, anyone who needs a new phone right now does not yet have the option to buy one. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is available for preorder immediately and ships in early August, giving Samsung roughly a two-month head start in the market before Apple’s Pro lineup — and its own long-rumored foldable — are expected to arrive in September. That timing gap is notable given that Apple’s rumored foldable iPhone is expected to compete directly with Samsung’s Fold lineup once it ships.

What buyers should do next

For shoppers who want a phone in hand this summer, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a known quantity with a confirmed price, release date and hands-on reviews already emerging. For those willing to wait, the iPhone 18 Pro Max remains an open question until Apple holds its expected September event, and any purchasing decision made today based on leaked specifications carries the usual risk that final pricing, camera performance or design details could shift before launch.

Until Apple confirms details, the more accurate framing may not be “iPhone 18 Pro Max versus Galaxy Z Fold 8” but rather a choice between a proven foldable available now and a traditional flagship phone that, as of this week, still exists only in rumor form.

Get ahead of the market by subscribing to Seeking Alpha’s Wall Street Week Ahead, a preview of key events scheduled for the coming week. The newsletter keeps you informed of the biggest stories set to make headlines, including upcoming IPOs, investor days, earnings reports, and conference presentations.

Wall Street’s major averages aimed to go higher on Friday as oil prices decreased. Nonetheless, the indexes are on track for another losing week. Oil prices rose above $100 per barrel on Thursday after Houthi rebels reportedly struck two Saudi Arabian oil tankers in the Red Sea. President Donald Trump is looking to resume major military operations in Iran, according to reports. Trump also said China and Russia had assured him they would not supply weapons to Iran.

The next week will be packed with major earnings and key economic data releases. The Fed’s interest rate decision on Wednesday dominates the earnings calendar, followed by the FOMC press conference on Thursday. On Thursday, various other data, including preliminary Q/Q GDP numbers, initial jobless claims data, and PCE price index data are also due to be released. Consumer confidence data for July will be released on Tuesday, while Chicago PMI for the month is due on Friday.

Big tech earnings, including Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), and Meta (META) are lined up for the coming week. Other major firms reporting their results next week include Mastercard (MA), Visa (V), Coca-Cola (KO), and Boeing (BA).

_______________________________________________________________

Earnings spotlight: Monday: AstraZeneca (AZN). See the full earnings calendar.

Earnings spotlight: Tuesday: Visa, Coca-Cola, Boeing, Ford (F). See the full earnings calendar.

Earnings spotlight: Wednesday: Microsoft, Meta, P&G (PG), Arm (ARM), Qualcomm (QCOM). See the full earnings calendar.

Earnings spotlight: Thursday: Apple, Amazon (AMZN), Mastercard (MA). See the full earnings calendar.

Earnings spotlight: Friday: AbbVie (ABBV), Chevron (

Long before Erling Haaland became one of the most feared strikers in world soccer, his father was building a career of his own in England’s top flight and on the international stage with Norway. As Erling led Norway to its best-ever World Cup finish this month, attention has turned once again to the man who shaped his path: Alfie Haaland, a former Premier League defender whose own playing days quietly set the stage for his son’s rise.

A career built in England’s top division

Alfie Haaland, born Alf-Inge Rasdal Håland on November 23, 1972, in Stavanger, Norway, began his professional career at hometown club Bryne before moving to England in 1993 to join Nottingham Forest. He spent four seasons there before transferring to Leeds United in 1997, where he was part of a side that reached the semifinals of the UEFA Cup and qualified for the Champions League. In 2000, he joined Manchester City, where he made 35 appearances and scored three goals before persistent knee problems forced him into early retirement in 2003, at age 30.

Across his club career in England, Haaland made more than 180 appearances and scored 18 goals, playing primarily as a right-back or defensive and central midfielder. His knee troubles were largely traced to a notorious 2001 tackle by then-Manchester United captain Roy Keane, an incident that became one of the more infamous episodes of that era of Premier League rivalry and ultimately shortened Haaland’s playing days.

Norway’s 1994 World Cup squad

Haaland earned the first of his 34 senior caps for Norway in January 1994, in a friendly against Costa Rica, and went on to represent his country at that year’s World Cup in the United States, appearing in matches against Italy and Mexico. He continued playing for the national team through 2001, though he never scored a goal in international competition. Injury kept him out of Norway’s 1998 World Cup squad, the last time the country had qualified for the tournament before this summer.

Haaland was one of three players on that 1994 World Cup roster whose sons would go on to represent Norway at this year’s tournament, alongside the fathers of teammates Alexander Sørloth and Kristian Thorstvedt — a generational link that added an extra layer of storytelling to Norway’s return to the World Cup stage after a 28-year absence.

Erling wasn’t born until 2000

Erling Haaland was born in July 2000, three years before his father’s playing career ended, meaning the bulk of Alfie’s professional days came before his son was old enough to remember them firsthand. Still, growing up around professional locker rooms and training grounds gave the younger Haaland an early, close-up education in the sport that would eventually make him one of its biggest stars. Alfie has remained closely involved in his son’s career in the years since, often described as a mentor and adviser as Erling rose through Norwegian youth football, a stint at Austrian club Red Bull Salzburg, and stardom first at Borussia Dortmund and then at Manchester City — his father’s former club.

Norway’s historic World Cup run

This summer marked a milestone for the Haaland family and for Norwegian soccer as a whole. Norway advanced to the World Cup quarterfinals for the first time in the country’s history, riding a tournament in which Erling Haaland scored in each of his first four matches and finished with seven goals overall, drawing comparisons to some of the most prolific individual World Cup campaigns in the competition’s history.

Norway’s run ended on July 11 in a 2-1 extra-time loss to England in Miami. Andreas Schjelderup gave Norway the lead in the first half, but Jude Bellingham equalized for England in first-half stoppage time and then scored the winner three minutes into extra time, pouncing on a rebound from a Morgan Rogers shot. Norway had a second-half goal from Torbjørn Heggem controversially disallowed after a video review showed Erling Haaland had fouled England’s Elliot Anderson in the buildup to the corner kick that led to it.

Alfie’s reaction on social media

The elder Haaland did not hide his frustration with the result. Writing on X after the final whistle, he took aim at the officiating, posting, “Well done Bellingham and referee,” a pointed jab suggesting the outcome had been shaped as much by the whistle as by the football played. In a follow-up post, he added that Norway felt “robbed” by the result, while conceding, “Hope England win the WC now.”

The posts quickly circulated among soccer fans and media outlets covering the tournament, adding to a wave of attention on the Haaland family throughout Norway’s tournament run. Erling Haaland himself has often credited his father’s influence not just for his technical development but for his mentality on the field, an attitude that became a talking point throughout Norway’s surprise march to the quarterfinals.

A family legacy renewed

Norway’s quarterfinal appearance closes out a remarkable chapter for a country that had not reached the World Cup since 1998, the tournament Alfie Haaland missed through injury after playing in the 1994 edition. With Erling Haaland just 26 and already established as one of the sport’s most dominant strikers, and with Norway fielding a young core built around him and midfielder Martin Ødegaard, the country’s soccer federation and fans alike are hoping this summer’s breakthrough marks the beginning of a sustained run of tournament appearances rather than a one-off return to the world stage.

For the Haaland family, the tournament offered a full-circle moment: a father who once wore Norway’s colors at a World Cup watching his son do the same, three decades later, on a bigger stage than either could have imagined when Alfie first pulled on the national jersey in 1994.

Available for over a year

This week has seen a new Prime Minister and a new Chancellor of the Exchequer. As soon as John Healey was appointed the announcements began. First came the announcement to cut VAT on household energy bills from October, next a plan to cap bus fares in England from January, then a 20% cut to business rates for pubs, clubs and live music venues in England starting from April. But what about that major issue on the doorstep when Andy Burnham was campaigning to be elected in his new constituency of Makerfield? The frozen personal tax threshold. We’ll discuss what this might mean for your money.

Nearly two million households in England and Wales are living in water poverty according to a new study seen exclusively by this programme. The technical definition of that is when people spend more than 5% of their income, after housing costs, on water bills. What it means in reality is being unable to afford to pay for water, and being in debt to a water company. We’ll speak to the Consumer Council for Water, who commissioned that study.

Plus, we’ll look at the rules around gifts and inheritance tax as a new survey by the financial advisors The Private Office found more then 8 in 10 of its clients aged over 45 believe parents and grandparents should help younger generations during their lifetime rather than leave an inheritance after death.

Presenter: Paul Lewis
Reporter: Dan Whitworth
Researchers: Amber Mehmood, Catherine Lund and Jo Krasner.
Editor: Jess Quayle
Senior News Editor: Sara Wadeson

(First broadcast 12pm Saturday 25th July 2026)

Programme WebsiteShow less

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of BSM, DMLP either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.