Connect with us

Crypto

Billions in Bitcoin options expired today. What actually changed hands?

Published

on

BTC breaks $80k for the first time since January as Fox DeFi explains the capital driving the rally

Bitcoin’s September 25 quarterly options expiry has put an enormous open-interest figure beside a much smaller and less visible question: which contracts produced payments? The exchange rules tell us what a winning holder receives. They do not turn a pre-expiry headline into a verified account of money transferred at settlement.

Summary

  • Deribit’s September quarterly Bitcoin options expired at 08:00 UTC on September 25, with a 30-minute settlement-price window.
  • A September 23 report cited roughly $16.1 billion of Bitcoin options open interest, a snapshot before the deadline rather than a settlement bill.
  • Inverse Bitcoin options settle cash flows in BTC; USDC linear options can produce USDC cash flows under a different contract design.
  • An option’s strike and settlement price determine its intrinsic value, while premiums and prior hedges affect each trader’s net result.
  • A reliable total of funds transferred requires contract-level positions and clearing data that the public headline does not provide.

Bitcoin options worth billions of dollars have reached their quarterly expiry, but the advertised amount has not been paid from one side of the market to the other.

Deribit’s published expiry schedule puts the September quarterly contracts on the final Friday of the month at 08:00 UTC. Its delivery-price policy uses an index time-weighted average between 07:30 and 08:00 UTC. That is the price reference for automatic exercise and settlement of qualifying contracts. A pre-expiry estimate describes positions still open at an earlier observation time. It cannot be read as a receipt for the 08:00 settlement.

Advertisement

A September preview of the combined expiry cited approximately $18.1 billion across Bitcoin and Ether as of September 23, with Bitcoin accounting for about $16.1 billion in the snapshot it reported. An earlier $16.6 billion combined estimate appeared on September 15. Neither figure is a timestamped count of contracts that remained open at the cutoff, much less the cash or coins exchanged by winners and losers. The amount changes as positions are opened, closed or rolled, and as the underlying Bitcoin price changes the dollar translation of BTC denominated contracts.

There are three separate ledgers behind the headline. Open interest measures the outstanding contract position before expiry. Intrinsic settlement measures the value of options that finish in the money at the prescribed price. Net trading profit adds the premium paid or received and the results of any hedge put on before settlement. They are different numbers, potentially recorded in different assets. Collapsing them into one figure makes a market event sound more like a mass transfer than the contract terms support.

Advertisement

The big number measures outstanding positions

An option gives its buyer a right linked to a specified strike price, while its seller has the corresponding obligation. A call benefits from a settlement price above its strike. A put benefits from a settlement price below it. Open interest counts outstanding positions, ordinarily one long and one short for each open contract. Counting those two sides as separate piles of wealth would double-count the economic exposure. Counting every dollar of notional as a payout makes a different mistake: an option can expire without value, or finish only a small distance beyond its strike.

The reported $16.1 billion Bitcoin component was a pre-expiry estimate of outstanding positions, not the amount of premium paid when those positions were first traded. Option premiums can be a fraction of the notional exposure and vary with strike, maturity and implied volatility. Nor is the estimate the maximum loss of every buyer. A buyer generally risks the premium paid, while a short option can have a very different risk profile, subject to margin and any offsetting trades.

The exchange and the publication also define the scope of the estimate. A figure drawn from Deribit data does not automatically include every venue’s Bitcoin options, over-the-counter positions or listed futures used as hedges. Even within one venue, a dollar presentation can translate BTC contract sizes using an underlying price that differs from the eventual delivery price. To audit a headline, a reader needs its observation timestamp, currency, contract universe and calculation method.

The September 23 snapshot preceded expiry by almost two days. Some positions could have been closed through a trade, reducing open interest; others could have been opened or shifted into later maturities. A trader rolling a September call into October does not receive the September notional as cash. The exchange offsets the old position in a transaction and the trader opens another position at a different premium. Exchange volume during that process is real trading activity, but it is distinct from the final exercise amount.

Advertisement

Deribit’s contract specifications also distinguish inverse, BTC settled options from linear options whose results are settled through USDC products. A dollar sum across instruments may be a convenient scale measure, yet it does not identify a single pot of dollars ready to move at 08:00. The legal contract and its settlement currency determine the ledger entry. The quoted notional alone cannot.

The contrast has appeared in earlier coverage. After an August expiry of roughly $9.6 billion of options, the market could still trade on funding, spot flows and macroeconomic news. The fact that a large maturity arrives on a calendar does not isolate its price impact. It does, however, eliminate the expiring option positions and may change how dealers hedge any positions that survive in other instruments.

The 08:00 price sets exercise, not trading volume

Deribit’s delivery-price documentation specifies an index time-weighted average during the 30 minutes ending at 08:00 UTC for the relevant expiry. This matters because a single last trade at 08:00 is not the settlement price. A headline saying Bitcoin briefly touched a strike cannot show whether a call or put settled in the money. The exchange’s published delivery price, for the correct underlying and date, is the relevant reference.

For a conventional European-style option, exercise at expiry depends on the relationship between that delivery price and the strike. A call struck at $80,000 is worth $5,000 per BTC of underlying at a hypothetical $85,000 delivery price before premiums and contract-specific currency conversion. A call struck at $90,000 has no intrinsic value at the same price. A put struck at $90,000 has $5,000 per BTC of intrinsic value. Those values do not tell us how much any holder made: the holder could have paid $6,000 for the first call and lost $1,000 after the exercise value.

Advertisement

That $85,000 is an illustrative price, not a claim about September 25’s actual delivery price. It lets us separate the unit of notional from the unit of payment. Consider a holder of one BTC equivalent of the $80,000 call. The holder’s $80,000 strike exposure is not transferred at expiry. On these assumptions, the gross intrinsic value is $5,000. For a corresponding inverse BTC cash-settled calculation, a $5,000 USD value converted at $85,000 per BTC is approximately 0.058824 BTC. The exact exchange debit and credit must follow the instrument’s own payoff specification, including contract size and rounding.

Change the hypothetical delivery price to $80,100, and the same call has just $100 per BTC of intrinsic value. Leave it at $79,900, and the call has none. The advertised notional attached to the open position could look broadly similar in all three cases just before settlement, while the actual exercise value changes dramatically. Near-the-money concentration is therefore more informative for settlement than a single aggregate notional.

Deribit’s inverse options specifications describe automatic exercise of in-the-money options and cash settlement in BTC. Cash settlement means an account is credited or debited under the contract; it does not require delivery of physical Bitcoin in exchange for a strike payment, nor a purchase of one BTC in the spot market for every expiring call. Its delivery procedure pauses trading in expiring instruments around the event and updates balances. The clearing system nets obligations by account and contract. Public open interest, which consists of outstanding longs and shorts, does not reveal that account-level netting.

Some traders may have exchanged premiums minutes or weeks earlier. A customer can buy a call from a market maker, and the market maker can hedge by buying spot Bitcoin or futures. When the option expires, that hedge may be reduced, maintained for another exposure or transferred to a new maturity. A spot purchase before expiry and a sale after expiry are actual market trades, but neither should be labeled the option settlement cash flow. An observed burst of spot volume requires a separate attribution to identify whose hedges changed.

Advertisement

Two contract designs can pay in different assets

The BTC inverse option and a USDC linear option may both appear in a dashboard of Bitcoin options exposure. Their payoff plumbing differs. Deribit’s inverse option uses BTC as the settlement currency. Its value expressed in dollars at the delivery price is translated into a BTC account change. A participant receiving BTC can choose to sell it later, but the settlement itself is an exchange-account credit in the contract currency, not automatic evidence of a sale into dollars.

Deribit’s current linear-options documentation says the USDC product exercises into a future and that the resulting position is cash settled in USDC. The exchange introduced this two-step arrangement in April 2026. At expiry, therefore, describing every Bitcoin option as simply paying BTC would be incorrect. The exercise may create an offsetting futures position before the USDC settlement step. The relevant futures specifications say profit and loss is transferred in USDC. A reporter has to inspect the instrument code before calling the payment BTC, USDC or a spot-market purchase.

Advertisement

The term cash settled can confuse readers because it does not necessarily mean a bank-wire transfer in fiat currency. On a crypto derivatives venue it refers to a ledger cash flow in the contract’s specified unit, potentially BTC or a stablecoin account balance. These credits and debits are real economic transfers between counterparties through the clearing venue. Their total gross value is not published merely by reporting options open interest.

The conversion creates a subtle accounting issue. If a BTC-settled inverse option has a fixed USD intrinsic value in a hypothetical payoff, the number of BTC credited depends on the delivery price used for conversion. Summing BTC credits across strikes and translating the result at a different spot price later would give another dollar figure. A claim of an exact amount “changing hands” must identify its unit and valuation time. The same headline can otherwise conflate the option’s reference exposure with coins delivered, dollar-valued settlement and exchange volume.

This distinction matters to risk as well as to journalism. A trader receiving BTC from a winning inverse option can have more BTC exposure after settlement unless another position offsets it. A USDC linear payout adds a different balance and may leave no equivalent BTC holding. If the goal is to infer buying pressure from expiry, one would need to observe how recipients traded those balances, what sellers did to cover obligations and whether market makers unwound hedges. The settlement rules alone do not establish a directional spot flow.

Advertisement

Max pain is a model, not a clearing result

Expiry coverage often quotes a “max pain” strike, the price at which the aggregate intrinsic value of open call and put positions would be minimized under a specified snapshot and simplified assumptions. The number can be recalculated when positions change. It does not dictate the actual delivery price, and it is not an amount transferred. The method also assumes open-interest holders have similar interests, while real accounts can combine options at several strikes, futures, spot positions and exposures on other venues.

An options seller might welcome a given strike finishing out of the money in isolation. The same trader may have bought an offsetting option, sold futures or hedged spot inventory, changing the net economic result. An observed concentration of calls at one strike does not tell us whether the holders are retail buyers, institutions hedging a different position or market makers long an option against a short elsewhere. The published distribution does not identify the beneficial owners or their net books.

The weakness becomes obvious with distant strikes. Coverage of far out of the money Bitcoin puts described hundreds of millions of dollars of notional at a $20,000 strike in a prior expiry. Such positions can alter a chart of outstanding risk without implying a payout at a market price many times higher. They may be cheap catastrophe hedges, parts of spreads or inventory. The strike distribution, not simply the headline sum, determines which portion finishes with intrinsic value.

Even a complete strike-by-strike open-interest table just before the cutoff would not tell the whole story. It could support an estimate of gross intrinsic value if paired with the verified delivery price and exact contract specifications. But it would still lack every trader’s paid premium, offsets and cross-market hedges. It also might not reveal bilateral position netting or whether a venue applies particular rounding and exercise rules. An estimate of gross exercise value is a narrower, defensible claim than a claim of total market profit.

Advertisement

A market maker’s delta hedge can produce buying or selling before the delivery window. As the underlying moves toward a crowded strike, the option’s sensitivity to small price moves may change rapidly, especially near expiry. The direction of the hedge depends on whether the dealer is net long or short the relevant options and what other positions are in the book. Public open interest is not a sign map of dealers’ net exposures. Assertions that “max pain pulled the price” or that billions of expiring calls forced a rally need evidence of positioning and hedge trades, not a strike chart alone.

There is also an adverse-case argument: because the expiry is known in advance, dealers and customers may have managed much of their exposure days earlier. A large option notional can disappear at 08:00 while the spot market barely notices. Conversely, a smaller expiring book can matter if it is concentrated near spot and the hedges are highly sensitive. Both outcomes are consistent with the mechanics. Neither can be predicted from the largest headline number.

A trade, an exercise and a hedge leave different traces

An option trade before the cutoff exchanges an option at a premium, generally opening, closing or transferring a position. A buyer may pay that premium when the contract is acquired. If the buyer sells the option to someone else before expiry, the first buyer realizes a trading result without holding through settlement. If both original sides close, open interest falls. Trading volume can rise substantially while open interest declines because old positions are being unwound.

An exercise at the cutoff is a different event. For an option that finishes in the money, the venue calculates its contractual value against the delivery price and posts the appropriate balances. An out-of-the-money option expires worthless in intrinsic terms, though its writer may have collected the premium earlier. The short side’s liability at exercise is paired with the long side’s receipt under venue clearing, with account-level collateral and netting governing what is actually posted.

Advertisement

A hedge is a third event. If a seller sold a call and bought BTC to hedge, that earlier BTC purchase was a spot trade. The seller might sell the BTC as the call expires or might use it against another short call. An unrelated institution could simultaneously buy spot BTC. A price chart around 08:00 is the net result of all trading motives, so a directional move does not automatically reveal the expiry’s cause. To identify hedging, analysts need timestamped flows, order-book behavior and credible information about dealer positioning.

This is why the question “what changed hands?” has two defensible answers. Mechanically, the expiry extinguished expiring option rights and obligations and posted contract-defined BTC or USDC results for positions that qualified. Numerically, the aggregate BTC and USDC transferred across all accounts cannot be extracted from the public pre-expiry notional estimate. There is no verified total settlement payout in the sources reviewed for this article. A precise figure would require the exchange’s final delivery price, position distribution by instrument and strike, and a method for aggregating its clearing entries.

Coinbase’s institutional Deribit migration shows why venue context also matters. Deribit became part of Coinbase’s institutional derivatives business, but a platform ownership story does not change each listed contract’s payoff rule. One must still identify the actual exchange product, margin currency and settlement method before aggregating amounts. Offshore venues, OTC dealers and U.S. listed products may have different expiries and clearing systems, so a claim about the entire Bitcoin options market needs an explicit venue universe.

The evidence needed for a real settlement tally

A reproducible calculation would begin with Deribit’s final September 25 delivery price for BTC, as published by the exchange, and a timestamped inventory of expiring instruments immediately before 08:00 UTC. Each row would need the option type, strike, contract size, denomination, settlement currency and outstanding count. Applying the correct payoff formula would produce an estimate of gross intrinsic exercise value by contract. Adding those figures after converting at a stated reference price would give a comparable dollar estimate, not a count of independent market trades.

Advertisement

A second layer would check actual exercise records, trading halts, expiration adjustments, fees and clearing balances. If the research question is the amount of BTC and USDC credited, the analyst should keep the asset totals separate rather than quietly converting everything into dollars. If the question is net transfer by customer or liquidity provider, account-level books are necessary, and public strike totals will not suffice. If the question is profit, historical premiums, fees and hedges must be included.

As of this feature’s preparation on September 25, no independently verified, complete 08:00 UTC contract-level snapshot and exchange-wide payout tally were available to us. We therefore do not substitute the September 23 $16.1 billion Bitcoin estimate for a settlement total or manufacture a cash-flow figure by applying an assumed percentage. The hypothetical $85,000 scenario above is a mechanics illustration only. The actual delivery price and resulting aggregate exercise value should be checked against the exchange’s final record before anyone publishes a precise payout claim.

There is a practical reason to keep the uncertainty visible. The largest expiry number rewards a dramatic statement, yet the size of the realized transfer is governed by distance from strikes and the positions still open at the cutoff. Two investors can both have a profitable option exercise while one loses money after its premium and the other makes money. A dealer can lose on an option and gain on its hedge. Counting the exercise alone would report the contract’s settlement correctly but misstate who gained from the whole trade.

Nor can exchange settlement identify the day’s net impact on Bitcoin’s price. If delta hedges were adjusted gradually ahead of the cutoff, little buying or selling need occur afterward. If positions were concentrated at nearby strikes and dealers had to unwind quickly, flow could appear before or after 08:00. Macro news, leveraged futures, ETF creations and spot demand also move the price. An event study would compare order flow around the delivery window with comparable trading periods and still need caution about attribution.

Advertisement

The most useful post-expiry update is therefore not another round number. It is the exchange’s published delivery price; a timestamped table of expiring open interest by strike and product; the estimated intrinsic value split between calls and puts, BTC and USDC; and an explicit statement that the calculation is gross settlement, not net investor gains. That would answer a smaller question accurately. The much larger question of who bought or sold Bitcoin because of expiry would require independent evidence of trades and hedge positions.

The expiry cleared contracts, not the headline billions

The September quarterly expiry removed a known set of dated options from the order book and resolved the exercise rights of positions that survived until 08:00 UTC. It did not cause the entire stated $16.1 billion Bitcoin notional to change owners as cash, Bitcoin or stablecoins. Some contracts finished without intrinsic value; those in the money received contractual account credits according to their instrument design. Earlier premiums and hedges belong to other transactions and other times.

A reader can use the size estimate to understand that the event was substantial and that traders had a reason to watch a narrow settlement window. It cannot tell the reader how much was paid, who profited or whether an observed Bitcoin move was caused by forced hedging. The honest answer to the headline is a set of actual ledger mechanisms plus a missing public aggregate, rather than a single dollar total borrowed from open interest.

What to watch

  • Deribit’s published delivery price: Use the September 25 BTC index value based on the 07:30 to 08:00 UTC window.
  • Final open interest by strike: Compare an 08:00 expiry snapshot with earlier estimates before calculating exercise value.
  • Product and currency split: Separate inverse BTC options from linear USDC options when reporting settlement.
  • Gross exercise estimate: Show the strike-level payoff calculation and label it separately from traders’ net profit.
  • Timestamped spot and futures flows: Check actual trades and hedges before attributing a later Bitcoin price move to expiry.

These observations could support a settlement estimate. Public order flow alone would still not identify every account that bought or sold Bitcoin because of expiry.

FAQ

What time did the Bitcoin options expire?

Deribit’s September 2026 quarterly contracts expired at 08:00 UTC on Friday, September 25. Its delivery-price policy uses the index time-weighted average from 07:30 to 08:00 UTC for the corresponding instrument.

Advertisement

Did $16.1 billion in Bitcoin change hands?

No such conclusion follows from the September 23 open-interest snapshot. It estimated outstanding Bitcoin option exposure ahead of expiry, not the value exercised or balances transferred at settlement. An exact later payout needs final contract and clearing data.

What happens to an option that expires out of the money?

It has no intrinsic exercise value at the delivery price. The buyer’s earlier premium is still a cost and the seller’s earlier premium is still part of its trade result. Other offsets or fees can change either party’s total result.

Are winning Bitcoin options paid in BTC?

Deribit’s inverse BTC options are cash settled in BTC. Its USDC linear option design can exercise into a future that is subsequently cash settled in USDC. The contract’s instrument type determines the unit of payment.

Is the settlement price Bitcoin’s last trade at 08:00?

Deribit’s documented delivery price uses a time-weighted index over the preceding 30 minutes. A single exchange print or a fleeting touch of a strike does not establish the contract’s exercise value.

Advertisement

Does max pain predict where Bitcoin will trade?

It is a calculation of aggregate intrinsic value at hypothetical prices under an open-interest snapshot. It is not a binding settlement target. The positions, hedges and delivery price may change its relevance before the cutoff.

Did dealers have to buy Bitcoin after expiry?

The public notional estimate does not show dealer net positioning or hedge behavior. Some dealers may have adjusted earlier, held offsetting trades or used futures. Establishing a post-expiry purchase requires evidence of actual trading flows.

What would verify the total amount paid?

A final delivery price, complete expiring instrument counts by strike and type, exact contract specifications and exercise or clearing records would support a reproducible gross payout calculation. Premiums and hedge trades are needed for net profit.

Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Figures reflect regulatory filings and reporting available at the time of writing and change with each disclosure. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or asset. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of September 25, 2026.

Advertisement




Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto

BTC, ETH price news: Bitcoin slips to $83,000 as ZEC drops 12% and oil climbs again

Published

on

BTC, ETH price news: Bitcoin slips to $83,000 as ZEC drops 12% and oil climbs again

“Bitcoin has pulled back to $83K, testing the lower boundary of last week’s consolidation range,” Alex Kuptsikevich, chief market analyst at FxPro, said in an email to CoinDesk. “As with the market as a whole, a retest of the $82K region, where peaks were formed in May and early September, is entirely to be expected under current conditions.”

“Looking ahead, a sustained return to prices below $80K would be an important signal that the market is not ready to move higher for some time yet. If, however, this consolidation is soon followed by a new bullish momentum, it could send the leading cryptocurrency well above $90K,” he added.

The pressure is coming from bonds and oil.

Treasuries steadied in Asia after tumbling during U.S. trading, with the 10-year yield up one basis point to 5.25% after reaching its highest level since 2007 on Monday. A higher guaranteed return on government debt raises the bar for holding assets that pay no income, bitcoin among them.

Advertisement

Brent rose more than 1% to nearly $107 a barrel, its second straight gain, as hopes for an imminent diplomatic breakthrough with Iran faded.

Pricier oil feeds into inflation, and traders have been adding to bets that the Fed will raise rates again. MSCI’s All Country World Index fell to its lowest since Sept. 18, and Nasdaq 100 futures slipped 0.3% after Monday’s tech-led selloff on Wall Street.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Tether is a ‘lifeline’ for Iranian regime, Senate Dems say in new report

Published

on

Tether is a ‘lifeline’ for Iranian regime, Senate Dems say in new report

U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin Tether is a go-to tool for the Iranian government to bypass sanctions, a new report from a group of Senate Democrats said.

Democrats on the Senate’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s Permanent Subcommittee on Intelligence published a report Monday laying out the argument that Tether plays a key role in allowing Iran to conduct transactions that skirt international sanctions.

“Iran’s cryptocurrency-based shadow banking network has processed significant volumes of funds and implicates various Iranian interests,” the report said, adding that Tether has “repeatedly failed” to block Iran-connected wallets.

“USDT has become a significant financial lifeline within Iran’s shadow banking network,” the report said.

Advertisement

When Tether does freeze wallets, it sometimes takes weeks, but the company also sometimes responds to requests without actually blacklisting wallets, the report claimed.

“Prior to 2024, Tether did not comprehensively and consistently freeze wallets designated by counter-terrorism agencies and continues to fail to proactively block clearly illicit wallets,” the report said. “This absence of deterrence invited abuse: terrorist organizations such as Hamas shifted from transacting in Bitcoin and a mix of cryptocurrencies to promoting USDT.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Grok AI Predicts XRP Could Hit $40 in 2026 With Landmark Event

Published

on

Ripple price prediction: Elon Musk's Grok AI predicts that XRP could reach $40 by 2027 if a wild announcement is made in Q4

Elon Musk’s Grok AI predicts an extremely bullish price for Ripple (XRP) by January 1, 2027, that will blow the minds of even the most dedicated members of the Ripple Army.

If you’re holding a sizeable bag of XRP USD, you may want to sit down before reading this. Grok claims that $25–$40 is achievable by 2027, with a stretch target of $50+ under the assumption of a full-blown crypto bull market returning and being supercharged by an unprecedented institutional catalyst.

Ripple price prediction: Elon Musk's Grok AI predicts that XRP could reach $40 by 2027 if a wild announcement is made in Q4
SOURCE: Grok AI Predicts XRP Price

XRP currently trades near $1.50–$1.52 as of September 28, 2026, down nearly -3% over the past 24 hours and with a daily trading volume of $3.5Bn, up from $3.2Bn the day prior.

This outlook is extreme and leans far beyond standard institutional forecasts. It assumes not only a strong late-2026 bull market driven by liquidity and risk-on conditions, but also a once-in-a-generation catalyst.

What is the Catalyst that Grok AI Predicts Could Spark an XRP Run Toward $40

Advertisement

Major central banks (including the Fed, ECB, Bank of Japan, and PBOC) announcing that the XRP Ledger will serve as a primary settlement layer for cross-border CBDC and tokenized asset flows, combined with large commercial banks being incentivized or required to hold XRP as a liquidity buffer, and revelations of massive sovereign wealth fund accumulation.

Under this highly speculative scenario, forced institutional demand collides with retail FOMO in a classic late-cycle mania, allowing XRP to move from the current ~$1.50 range through previous-cycle highs and into the mid-to-high double digits by early 2027.

This remains pure speculation and entertainment, not a base-case or even high-probability outlook. Crypto markets are extremely volatile, and the catalyst described above would require multiple extraordinary policy and institutional developments.

However, with Ripple’s case against the SEC dropped and its subsequent rise as a highly favored US-based digital asset company under President Trump, anything could be on the table for XRP if the perfect scenario aligns.

Advertisement

Got a Gut Feeling? It Could Pay Out 3.7X on Polymarket

Technical Analysis Supporting the Insane Grok AI XRP Price Prediction

Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time

On the higher timeframes, XRP has already established a constructive recovery base after reclaiming key moving averages from the mid-September lows near $1.25–$1.30. Price is consolidating in the $1.45–$1.55 region after testing highs near $1.63–$1.66.

In a normal bull market, a sustained break above $1.70–$2.00 would open the door to the prior cycle high near $3.65. Under the extreme institutional adoption scenario outlined above, that prior high would likely be cleared with significant force, triggering a series of measured-move and Fibonacci extension targets far beyond historical levels.

Advertisement

Aggressive projections from the multi-year base, combined with the kind of vertical price discovery seen in previous mania phases, could theoretically extend into the $25–$40+ zone if volume and momentum expand dramatically. RSI and momentum indicators would almost certainly reach deeply overbought levels during such a move, which is typical of parabolic advances.

Key nearer-term supports remain in the $1.40–$1.45 and $1.30 zones; holding those would keep the broader recovery structure intact while the market waits for (or prices in) any extraordinary catalysts.

Overall, while the current chart supports continued upside in a standard bull market, only an extreme surge in institutional demand and narrative intensity could justify the kind of multi-thousand-percent extension implied by the $25–$50 targets.

Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX

Advertisement

Maxi Doge Targets Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels

While the Grok AI prediction of a potential 30x run for XRP is exciting, presale plays have a stronger track record of producing such returns. It does explain why attention keeps drifting toward presale-stage plays with smaller denominators.

Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is one of those plays. It is an Ethereum-based meme token built around a 240-lb canine mascot and a “1000x leverage” trading-culture identity. The presale has raised $4.8M at a current price of $0.0002841, with dynamic APY staking live for holders.

Standout features include holder-only trading competitions with leaderboard rewards and a Maxi Fund treasury earmarked for liquidity and partnerships.

Advertisement

The meme-first, gym-bro marketing angle (“never skip leg day, never skip a pump”) is endearing. The accumulation numbers suggest plenty of traders are picking a side.

Get Ahead of Next Meme Coin Launch Here

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post Grok AI Predicts XRP Could Hit $40 in 2026 With Landmark Event appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto

Trump Rolls Back Fuel Economy Standards. Will Cars Really Get Cheaper?

Published

on

Trump Rolls Back Fuel Economy Standards. Will Cars Really Get Cheaper?

When it was first proposed in December 2025, the rule was divisive, drawing ire from environmental advocates while garnering praise from auto-industry trade groups. The Administration finalized it last week with a signoff from President Donald Trump.

The President commented on the forthcoming rule Sept. 26, saying the new standards would “take the waste out of building cars in America.”

“That means LOWER PRICES, saving families thousands on a new, beautiful, and safe car,” he wrote on Truth Social.

The claim that the revisions will pass down cost savings to American buyers, however, relies on several factors, including automakers’ pricing decisions, fuel costs, and broader economic conditions.

Advertisement

What changes under Trump’s new fuel economy rule?

Former President Joe Biden’s regulations were put in place in 2024 to reduce car-based greenhouse gas emissions, decrease dependence on fossil fuels, and spur a transition to electric and hybrid vehicles. The Trump Administration has claimed that its revisions are more focused on bolstering the auto industry and making safer, newer cars more accessible. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

The restaking gold rush is over, and top protocols are barely making a profit

Published

on

Restaking earns almost nothing (CoinDesk/Oliver Knight)

EigenLayer held $19.7 billion at its peak and liquid restaking tokens grew more than 1,000% in the first six weeks of 2024. But the services buying security never paid enough to cover both the base staking yield and a premium on top, so the second yield restaking promised never materialized.

On Sept. 8, DefiLlama’s restaking category held $10.02 billion and generated $99,977 in fees over the prior week. The liquid staking category, on $51.87 billion, generated $27.35 million. Per dollar secured, ordinary staking earns roughly 53 times more.

Restaking earns almost nothing (CoinDesk/Oliver Knight)

Two developments then removed what was left of the incentive to restake. Points programs subsidizing deposits wound down through 2025, and slashing went live in April 2025. Slashing is the penalty that confiscates part of an operator’s staked ETH when it misbehaves, by going offline or signing conflicting messages, for example. So restaking suddenly carried a real, priced downside where before the risk had been theoretical. There was no extra yield to compensate.

Set ether.fi aside and the rest of the sector is small. Renzo, Kelp, Swell, Puffer Finance and Bedrock, the five largest remaining liquid restaking tokens, made $953,350 in combined gross profit in the second quarter of 2026. Three quarters earlier the same five made $2.18 million. Puffer, which raised $23 million, recorded $21,590 for the quarter. Swell recorded $22,370.

What is left of liquid restaking, excludiing ether.fi (CoinDesk/Oliver Knight)

The income statements also show which part of these businesses was ever profitable, and it was not the restaking. On Kelp’s books, EIGEN token rewards appear at $460,600 in gross revenue and $460,600 in cost of revenue: they arrive and pass straight to depositors, leaving nothing with the protocol. Puffer and Swell book staking rewards the same way. Whatever profit these companies made came from the orinary staking fees charged underneath the restaking layer.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Goldman Sachs brings $100 billion Treasury fund into crypto’s institutional plumbing

Published

on

Goldman Sachs brings $100 billion Treasury fund into crypto’s institutional plumbing

“There’s a convergence now that you’re seeing between traditional market participants and digital asset market participants as well,” Lynq CEO Jerald David said in an interview with CoinDesk TV.

For firms using Lynq, FTIXX gives them somewhere to put cash between trades rather than leaving it sitting around. They can earn yield on the money and pull it out when they need it again.

That was a product Lynq’s clients had been asking for, David said. The network works with firms including B2C2, Wintermute, Galaxy ·, FalconX, Crypto.com and Fireblocks, whose businesses can require moving large amounts of money between trades. They wanted another option for putting that cash to work in the meantime.

“We needed to demonstrate that there was client demand,” David said. “Our clients were looking for a treasury asset on the platform that may have had a different yield profile than the other instrument that’s on there right now.”

Advertisement

Getting FTIXX onto the network required some work. Lynq had to modify its technology, restrict access to U.S. clients and integrate with Mosaic, he said. Customers also need a relationship with tZERO Securities and must meet the required onboarding and eligibility checks.

Lynq itself runs on a private, permissioned Avalanche (AVAX) Layer 1 blockchain. Its network has more than 30 institutional digital-asset firms onboarded and more than $89 million in assets, according to the company.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Crypto’s Widening Net: From Fed Bets to Blackjack Tables, Digital Assets Keep Blurring Old Boundaries

Published

on

If there is one throughline in this week’s crop of crypto headlines, it is that the industry has stopped pretending it is only about buying and holding coins. Across a handful of stories making the rounds, digital assets are shown pushing into territory once reserved for central bankers, casino floors, brokerage accounts and pre-IPO investors alike — a reminder that “crypto news” increasingly means finance news, gambling news and macro news rolled into one.

Take the growing chatter around prediction markets and Federal Reserve policy. Traders have been flocking to on-chain betting platforms to price the odds of late-2026 rate decisions, effectively turning monetary policy into a tradable asset class alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum. That such markets exist at all is notable: a decade ago, speculating on FOMC outcomes required options contracts or futures desks.

Now it can happen peer-to-peer on a blockchain, with odds shifting in real time as economic data lands. The rise of these markets suggests crypto infrastructure is becoming a genuine alternative venue for hedging and speculating on the traditional economy, not just a parallel casino for digital tokens.

Speaking of casinos, the sector itself continues to evolve in ways that mirror shifts in consumer taste rather than technology alone. Reports on crypto gambling lobbies note that live-dealer blackjack tables are increasingly outnumbering roulette wheels—a seemingly small detail that says more about what crypto-native gamblers want.

Advertisement

Live blackjack offers a sense of skill and control that pure-chance games like roulette can’t match, and operators appear to be responding by stacking their lobbies accordingly. It’s a small but telling sign that crypto casinos are maturing into product-driven businesses competing on experience, not just novelty.

Meanwhile, the boundary between crypto trading and traditional equities markets keeps eroding. New developments around Aave’s lending protocol reportedly let users borrow stablecoins against tokenized versions of tech stocks issued through Coinbase and built on the Base network.

If that model gains traction, it would mark a significant step in bringing real-world assets fully into DeFi’s collateral system — letting someone hold a tokenized slice of a Nasdaq darling and borrow against it the same way they might borrow against ETH or Bitcoin today. It’s the kind of integration that regulators, banks and crypto-native builders have all been circling for years, and its practical rollout matters more than the concept alone.

On the trading-platform side, perpetual futures exchanges continue to expand what counts as a “market.” One report describes a platform offering more than 120 perpetual contracts spanning everything from Bitcoin to pre-IPO robotics companies, letting traders apply leverage to assets that, in many cases, aren’t even publicly listed yet.

Advertisement

This kind of expansion into speculative, illiquid corners of the private market — wrapped in crypto’s leverage-friendly perpetual format — raises real questions about price discovery and risk, even as it satisfies demand from traders hungry for exposure beyond the usual crypto majors.

Finally, there’s the steady drumbeat of token listings that keeps the broader ecosystem churning. A gambling-focused token tied to the Dexsport platform recently landed on the MEXC exchange, a move that typically brings a token more liquidity and visibility, if not necessarily more fundamental value. Listings like these remain a bread-and-butter event in crypto markets — routine, but still closely watched by holders hoping for a price bump and a wider trading audience.

Individually, none of these developments is likely to reshape the industry overnight. But together they sketch a familiar pattern in crypto’s ongoing evolution: infrastructure built for speculative tokens is steadily being repurposed for macro bets, tokenized equities, private-company exposure and gambling products alike.

The technology is proving flexible enough to wrap around almost anything with a price — which is exactly why regulators, investors and casual observers alike keep struggling to say where “crypto” ends and the rest of finance begins.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Perplexity AI Predicts a Big Move for BTC in 2026 Even With Recent Dip

Published

on

Bitcoin price prediction: Microsoft Copilot AI predicts that if price momentum across the markets continues, BTC could hit $180K by 2027

Perplexity AI predicts that if a full-blown bull market returns in Q4, Bitcoin could reach $180,000 before January 1, 2027. The bullish range is estimated at $140,000 to $180,000, with a potential late-cycle surge that could push Bitcoin beyond $200,000.

Currently priced around $83,000, this would represent a gain of about 115% to reach $180,000. What’s noteworthy is that Bitcoin has already corrected significantly from its previous cycle high of about $126,200 on October 6, 2025, followed by a sharp decline during 2026.

Bitcoin has a history of producing substantial gains during strong market cycles. According to historical annual data, BTC gained approximately 154% in 2023 and 110% in 2024. If the current predictions hold true, we may see a similar increase on the horizon.

Bitcoin price prediction: Perplexity AI predicts that BTC could still rise to nearly $200K in 2026 even with it dropping -3% over the weekend
SOURCE: Perplexity AI Predicts Bitcoin Price

Perplexity AI Predicts Bitcoin to $180,000 if Bullish Catalysts Align: Does the Technical Analysis Back it Up?

Bitcoin recently broke out of a pattern of lower highs that had developed since May, reclaiming several key moving averages. According to Reuters’ technical analysis, $81,781 is considered important support, while $86,500 is a significant resistance level. Above that, the next technical targets are around $90,000 and $97,867.

Advertisement

CryptoQuant has noted a similar trend, calling $81,700 a key level because it aligns with Bitcoin’s 365-day moving average. Resistance levels above this are near $86,600 and $88,700.

Bitcoin’s first major test is surpassing the $85,000 level, followed by the $86,000 to $88,000 range. Bitcoin has pushed through this area, which matters because a sustained breakout would remove one of the largest technical obstacles between its current price and the $100,000 level.

The next major milestone is approximately $98,000. Beyond that, the market will be approaching the all-time high of $126,200, where it gets particularly interesting.

Advertisement

Once Bitcoin decisively breaks beyond $126,000, it will enter a phase of genuine price discovery. Historical resistance above that level is very limited. At that point, psychological targets such as $130,000, $140,000, and $150,000 could attract momentum traders and institutional investors.

Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX

Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early Mover Upside as Bitcoin Drops Dangerously Close to $80,000

A -2.5% daily drop is not too much to worry about for whales and those already heavily positioned at a much lower price. However, for those who bought over $80,000, things could be getting uncomfortable, which is why presale opportunities prove so popular.

Advertisement

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is positioning itself as the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with full SVM integration. It boasts smart contract execution built for speed that outpaces Solana itself, while settling back to Bitcoin’s base-layer security.

As of today, the presale has raised more than $33.1M at a current token price of just $0.0136864, with staking rewards live at launch at a huge 35% APY.

The pitch: solve Bitcoin’s slow transactions, high fees, and lack of programmability without abandoning what makes BTC trusted in the first place. A Decentralized Canonical Bridge handles BTC transfers natively.

Gain Access to New Bitcoin Layer 2 Early Here

Advertisement

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post Perplexity AI Predicts a Big Move for BTC in 2026 Even With Recent Dip appeared first on Cryptonews.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

XRP Price Slides 2.9% as $1.50 Reclaim Becomes Critical

Published

on

xrp logo

XRP lost its $1.50 price pivot today, sliding to $1.47 after a daily decline of about 3%. The break forces a binary question onto the chart: does the selling pressure showing up in spot-market volume resolve into a quick reclaim, or does it open the door to a deeper slide toward $1.40-$1.42?

The 200-day EMA is near $1.37, the level that would flip the medium-term structure from bullish to neutral. The token has been printing lower highs since a local peak near $1.63 on September 23, and a second attempt to clear $1.60 on September 25 failed as well. Since then, the decline has been slow and orderly: $1.55, then $1.52, then $1.50, and now $1.47.

Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time

There was no single dramatic session driving the move. Instead, the pattern reads as buyers simply not showing up, with every small bounce getting sold rather than extended. After the sharp rally in early September, that kind of cooling was overdue, but the open question is whether $1.50 was ever real support or just a round number the market is now testing.

Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX

Advertisement

ETF Accumulation Narrative or Technical Pullback?

The chart itself frames this as a cooling-off period following the rally that carried the XRP price up nearly 50% from its August low near $1.00. RSI sits at a neutral 54, with no overbought or oversold readings to lean on. Price levels, not oscillators, are setting the tone for this week.

XRP price slips 2.9% to $1.47 as bulls face a key test: reclaim $1.50 or risk a deeper pullback toward $1.37 and $1.30 if support fails.

Separately, market data has pointed to sustained spot XRP ETF inflows running into the hundreds of millions of dollars over recent weeks, a trend some trackers frame as ongoing institutional accumulation beneath the price action. That flow data is useful context, but it is not confirmed as the driver of Monday’s drop, as the pullback below $1.50 traces cleanly to failed resistance tests and fading bid support.

The medium-term structure remains intact for now. XRP sits above its 200-day EMA at $1.37, which is curling upward for the first time since spring. This is a sign the longer trend has not broken, even as the shorter-term chart bleeds lower. A descending trendline from the late-August spike to $1.70 was cleared in mid-September, and that breakout is what fueled the run to $1.67 in the first place.

A second descending trendline, drawn from the September 23 high, is now the line bulls need to clear in October; left alone, it points toward $1.20 by mid-November. The levels on both sides of the current price are well defined.

Advertisement

Trade XRP on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop

Reclaim $1.50 or Risk $1.37: XRP Price Next Move

The first job for bulls is straightforward: close a daily candle back above $1.50. Do that, and Monday’s drop reads as a fakeout rather than a breakdown, with $1.55 as the next confirmation level and $1.60-$1.63 as the target that would put the September 23 high back in play.

Fail to reclaim $1.50 in the next day or two, and $1.40-$1.42 becomes the level to watch, with the 200-day EMA at $1.37 as the line that actually matters for the medium-term outlook. A close below it would shift Ripple’s native asset from a bullish structure to a neutral one, opening room toward $1.30 and, in a broader crypto market sell-off scenario, $1.20.

Advertisement

For this week, the range is $1.37 to $1.60, with $1.50 sitting as the pivot in between. On technical analysis grounds, the base case is a dip toward $1.40-$1.42 that gets bought, followed by another attempt at reclaiming $1.50. A pattern consistent with pullbacks inside an uptrend rather than the start of a new downtrend.

The $1.80-$2.00 zone remains the valid medium-term target as long as $1.37 holds; lose it, and that target moves out of reach for the immediate term.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post XRP Price Slides 2.9% as $1.50 Reclaim Becomes Critical appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement




Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto

Crypto’s New Playground: Casinos, Fed Bets, and Tokenized Stocks Blur the Line Between Trading and Gambling

Published

on

The crypto industry has always had a talent for reinventing itself, but the latest wave of product launches suggests the industry is heading somewhere new: a place where trading, betting, and borrowing are becoming almost indistinguishable from one another. A cluster of recent developments — spanning live-dealer casino games, a new token listing tied to decentralized betting platforms, prediction markets built around Federal Reserve policy, sprawling perpetual futures exchanges, and DeFi protocols that let users borrow against tokenized shares of tech companies — paints a picture of an ecosystem racing to fuse speculation of every stripe into a single, crypto-native experience.

Take the world of crypto casinos, where live blackjack tables have reportedly begun to crowd out roulette wheels in lobby rankings. The dynamics driving that shift echo something familiar from traditional gambling: player preference for games that reward skill and pacing over pure chance. Blackjack lets players make decisions — when to hit, stand, split, or double down — giving a sense of agency that a spinning roulette wheel simply can’t replicate. In an industry built around instant, low-friction transactions using digital assets, that appeal seems to translate directly into engagement, with live-streamed dealers adding a layer of social, real-time theater that slot-style games lack.

That same appetite for interactive, decision-driven products is showing up elsewhere. Dexsport, a decentralized betting and casino platform, recently saw its native token, DESU, listed on the exchange MEXC — a milestone that matters less for the listing itself than for what it signals about the sector’s maturation. Token listings on major exchanges typically bring liquidity, visibility, and a degree of legitimacy that smaller platforms struggle to achieve on their own. For everyday users, a listing like this often translates into easier on-ramps, more trading pairs, and a stronger case that the underlying platform is being taken seriously by the broader market rather than treated as a niche experiment.

Meanwhile, speculation is moving well beyond games of chance and into the realm of macroeconomic policy. Prediction markets tracking the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decisions have become one of the more closely watched corners of crypto-adjacent finance heading into the back half of 2026. Traders on these platforms are effectively placing wagers on central bank behavior, turning monetary policy announcements into tradeable events. The appeal is straightforward: instead of relying solely on bond markets or futures tied to traditional finance, participants can now stake positions directly on whether the Fed will hold, cut, or raise rates, often with faster settlement and more granular contract structures than legacy markets offer. It’s a sign that prediction markets, once dismissed as a curiosity, are increasingly viewed as a legitimate barometer of trader sentiment on issues far removed from crypto prices themselves.

Advertisement

The appetite for exotic exposure is also evident in the perpetual futures space, where platforms like ApeX Omni have expanded their offerings well past the usual roster of Bitcoin and Ethereum contracts. With well over 120 perpetual markets now available, traders can reportedly take leveraged positions not just on major cryptocurrencies but on themes as far-flung as pre-IPO robotics companies. This kind of expansion reflects a broader trend of crypto exchanges positioning themselves as all-purpose speculation venues, offering leverage on virtually any asset class that generates enough trader interest — blurring the boundary between crypto trading and speculative bets on private, pre-public companies that would otherwise be inaccessible to retail investors.

Perhaps the clearest example of crypto finance colliding with traditional markets comes from Aave’s newest iteration. The protocol’s fourth version reportedly allows users to borrow USDC stablecoins against tokenized versions of Coinbase-linked tech stocks on the Base network. In practice, that means holders of tokenized equity exposure can unlock liquidity without selling their underlying positions — a mechanic long familiar to DeFi users who collateralize crypto assets, now extended to tokenized real-world securities. It’s a small but telling step toward a future where the wall between “crypto” and “traditional markets” continues to erode, with stocks, bonds, and other conventional assets increasingly represented on-chain and woven into the same lending and borrowing infrastructure that powers decentralized finance.

Taken together, these developments underscore a consistent theme: crypto platforms are no longer content to simply trade digital coins. They are building out entire ecosystems of speculation — casino games, prediction markets, leveraged derivatives, and collateralized lending — all designed to keep users engaged, liquid, and constantly exposed to new forms of risk and reward. Whether this convergence produces a more mature, diversified financial ecosystem or simply amplifies the volatility and risk-taking crypto is already known for remains an open question. What’s clear is that the industry’s appetite for expansion shows no signs of slowing down.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025