Crypto World
Berachain to Hard Fork, Swap Dual-Token Model for WBERA Rewards
Berachain is set to undergo a major protocol change this Wednesday that will reshape how the network pays incentives to participants. The upgrade, scheduled for 4:00 p.m. UTC, will retire the current Bera Governance Token (BGT) emissions and switch Berachain’s reward design to focus on its main BERA token via Wrapped BERA (WBERA).
In an announcement shared on Tuesday via the Berachain Foundation’s X account, the foundation said the hard fork will replace the network’s previous dual-token incentive structure. That model split incentives between transferable BERA and BGT, a governance asset that cannot be transferred. After the change, block rewards will be distributed as fixed WBERA amounts rather than BGT.
Key takeaways
- Berachain’s hard fork on Wednesday (4:00 p.m. UTC) will stop BGT emissions and end the dual-token incentive setup.
- Reward payouts will shift to WBERA block rewards, with the foundation describing the new design as simpler and more sustainable.
- WBERA emissions began on Tuesday, while BGT emissions are scheduled to be halted during the hard fork.
- Berachain’s foundation says APR may rise materially after the upgrade, but warned early yields could be volatile.
- Data tracking from CoinMarketCap and DefiLlama shows BERA and network TVL have recently been under pressure, suggesting activity remains subdued ahead of the change.
A shift from BGT to WBERA—and the mechanics behind it
The upgrade is designed to consolidate Berachain’s incentive system around WBERA, the wrapped form of its BERA token. According to the Berachain Foundation, the network will move away from BGT-based rewards and instead center incentives on staked WBERA (sWBERA), which it described as a more straightforward approach.
Before the upgrade, participants chasing higher yields reportedly had to work through several different reward pathways, including liquid staking mechanisms that were tied to BGT. The new plan reduces that complexity by changing what the network issues and how rewards flow.
Mechanically, the foundation outlined a two-stage transition. First, WBERA emissions started Tuesday. Then, at the scheduled time Wednesday, the hard fork will halt BGT emissions. In the days following the upgrade, the network will also phase out reward vaults and liquid staking incentives that are tied to BGT.
What it means for staking returns
Berachain’s foundation said the change could significantly improve yields, stating that annual percentage rates (APR) may triple after the upgrade. However, the foundation also cautioned that returns may swing during the first few days as the system settles into its new reward configuration.
For users, the practical implication is that the upgrade may initially produce short-term uncertainty even if the long-run incentive structure is intended to be more attractive. Traders and liquidity providers watching post-fork APR should expect the first window after Wednesday’s block transition to differ from the steady-state the foundation is aiming for.
Token performance and on-chain activity ahead of the fork
While Berachain prepares for the incentive overhaul, the market signal coming into Wednesday is not particularly strong. CoinMarketCap data cited in the coverage shows BERA was down about 7% over the 24 hours to 8:34 a.m. UTC. That move extends a broader slump in the token over the past year, bringing the decline to roughly 88%.
On the network side, DefiLlama data indicates Berachain’s total value locked (TVL) fell by $1.79 million, or about 3%, over the same 24-hour period. DefiLlama places the network around rank 37 by TVL, with approximately $56 million locked.
Activity metrics also point to a comparatively muted moment for the chain. Over the past 24 hours, the network generated $41 in chain fees and $3,359 in application revenue, while distributing $14,816 in token incentives. Together, these figures suggest that while incentives are currently being paid out under the existing model, overall utilization has not accelerated sharply ahead of the scheduled hard fork.
Why the “simpler” token economy matters
The foundation’s stated rationale is that the upgrade improves sustainability and reduces friction for users. In a dual-token system, participants often need to understand more than one asset’s role—especially when governance-related tokens like BGT are not freely transferable. By aligning incentives more directly with WBERA and emphasizing staked WBERA (sWBERA), the foundation is effectively trying to streamline how users participate and how rewards are structured.
That matters for investors and builders because incentive design can influence where liquidity concentrates. When reward logic is complex—especially when it involves multiple vaults and liquid staking pathways—capital can fragment across products and strategies. Streamlining rewards into a single centered asset may make it easier for users to evaluate positions and for liquidity to move as the network’s incentive targets shift.
At the same time, the transition introduces a period of adjustment. Since WBERA emissions started Tuesday and BGT emissions will stop only when the hard fork executes Wednesday, participants will be navigating a changing reward landscape on both days. This is especially relevant given the foundation’s own warning that yields could be volatile early on.
What remains uncertain is how quickly incentives will translate into measurable changes in on-chain activity—such as fees, application revenue, and TVL—after the upgrade. With recent data showing BERA and TVL trending downward, the post-fork period will be the real test of whether the new incentive system meaningfully boosts participation.
All eyes will be on Wednesday’s block upgrade and the days immediately afterward: whether APR stabilizes, how reward vault and liquid staking behavior changes as BGT-linked incentives are phased out, and whether chain usage improves enough to offset the current softness in TVL and token performance.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Tests $62K as $1.4B Options Expiry Hits Friday
Bitcoin reclaimed the $63,000 level on Thursday, but traders are approaching Friday’s $1.4 billion Bitcoin options expiry on Deribit with caution. The central debate is whether macro pressure—particularly rising US Treasury yields—will undermine BTC’s rebound and put the $62,000 support zone to the test.
While US bond yields pushing toward 4.6% have kept risk appetite cautious, Deribit positioning appears to be more balanced than outright bearish. That mix is setting up a weekend-or-later decision point for BTC’s short-term direction.
Key takeaways
- US 10-year Treasury yields nearing 4.6% are weighing on risk assets, reinforcing fears about debt concerns and tighter financial conditions.
- Deribit’s balanced put-to-call activity suggests downside demand is not dominating ahead of Friday’s large options expiry.
- Open interest and strike concentration point to key levels around $62,000, $61,000, and $63,500 for near-term price behavior.
- For bulls to extend their edge, BTC needs to hold above key expiry-related thresholds; otherwise, the market may remain rangebound.
Treasury yields and risk appetite: why BTC is stuck near $63K
The move in US government bond yields is driving much of the near-term caution. With the US 10-year yield approaching 4.6%, investors appear increasingly concerned about the expansion of government debt and the likelihood that additional monetary policy support may be needed to avoid a recessionary slowdown.
That backdrop has influenced Bitcoin’s trading behavior. BTC has largely been moving sideways, while equities—at least in the Nasdaq-100—have been holding relatively close to record levels. On Thursday, technology momentum continued to attract capital, supported by market-moving activity in semiconductors.
According to the article, SK Hynix’s US initial public offering was oversubscribed, contributing to strength across parts of the AI-linked chip complex. The result was a risk-on bid in equities, with Arm Holdings up about 10%, Advanced Micro Devices higher by roughly 7%, and Micron gaining around 7% intraday.
Still, equities strength does not automatically translate into sustained BTC upside when bond yields are rising. Bitcoin tends to react to shifts in global liquidity expectations, and bond yield pressure can quickly change the market’s risk calculus.
ETF flow worries cool off—options demand looks more balanced
Spot Bitcoin ETF flows briefly came back into focus on Wednesday, when the market saw $85 million in net outflows, ending a short run of three consecutive days of inflows. Earlier coverage by Cointelegraph linked that outflow episode to broader selling pressure in spot ETF markets.
However, the presence of outflows alone does not clarify whether institutions have shifted structurally bearish. More importantly for the near-term trade is how derivatives positioning has evolved into Friday’s expiry.
Deribit activity has been described as “balanced” between calls and puts, implying that demand for downside exposure has not surged. The key point is that options volumes over the past few days did not show a clear stampede into protective puts.
As cited in the piece, Laevitas data shows the put-to-call volumes relationship remains supportive of range stability. Even though call activity has outpaced put volume over four days—suggesting traders have trimmed urgency around downside—this is not the same as a market that is fully discounting volatility.
Deribit expiry setup: where the market’s incentives cluster
Friday’s weekly options expiry involves a large notional figure of $1.4 billion on Deribit, and the strike distribution matters for how price can “pin” near certain levels. The article highlights an interesting imbalance in the immediate strike zones.
Calls up to the $62,500 region amount to about $137 million, while puts above $61,000 total roughly $121 million. That does not imply an outright one-sided bet, but it does indicate that there is meaningful positioning both for upside continuation and for defense just below the middle of the range.
Open interest and strike placement also shape traders’ expectations for pinning behavior. With BTC positioned around the $63,000 area heading into expiry, the next move could be influenced by how market makers and hedgers respond to gamma exposure across key strikes. The article references Deribit open interest data for July 10 BTC, underscoring that the market is not operating without “gravity” around specific prices.
Within this framework, the piece outlines conditional outcomes: bulls would strengthen their position materially with a move above $63,500 by the 8:00 AM UTC expiry on Friday, while bears maintain a smaller edge below $61,000. Without additional macro or catalyst-driven volatility, the market may not deliver a decisive breakout purely from derivatives positioning.
Oil, geopolitics, and bond yields: what could break the range
Beyond crypto-native signals, the article points to two macro variables that could shift demand between fixed income and risk assets: energy and Treasury yields. A temporary truce in the Middle East could ease recession fears, encouraging capital rotation into higher-risk markets—an environment that typically supports BTC.
On the other hand, the piece also notes an ongoing counterweight. It argues that persistent uncertainty in the macro outlook, including the risk of additional large Treasury issuance to cover debt growth, could keep pressure on yields and dampen crypto upside attempts.
Traders are also asked to watch crude oil direction. A renewed escalation around Iran could push oil higher, worsening inflation fears and potentially forcing a less favorable policy outlook—conditions that tend to complicate liquidity for risk assets.
Crucially, the article ties these macro considerations back to options behavior: with put-option buying remaining restrained in recent sessions, BTC appears positioned to defend the $62,000 support level, at least in the immediate term. Still, that defense is not guaranteed. The market’s stability depends on whether bond yields ease and whether geopolitical risk stops feeding into inflation and rate expectations.
For now, the near-term picture is conditional: a successful expiry resolution above $63,500 could deliver short-term relief, but sustained upward progress would likely require a more supportive macro shift. Until then, traders may have to manage expectations for a range that can hold—but also revert quickly if yields keep climbing.
As Friday’s options expiry approaches, the key variables to watch are whether Treasury yields cool off and how price reacts around $63,500 and $62,000 into the settlement window—levels that derivatives positioning is effectively steering toward.
Crypto World
ZachXBT Sounds Alarm Over AscendEX as Users Struggle to Withdraw Funds
AscendEX said it stopped operating on July 1 after the MiCA transition period ended.
Following its exit, ZachXBT warned the public about the platform’s liquidity, alleging that it wouldn’t be able to process customer withdrawals.
ZachXBT Raises Fresh Liquidity Concerns
In its announcement, the crypto exchange said that it was winding down due to challenging market conditions and the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which left several crypto firms unable to operate in the region after failing to obtain the required authorization.
Following the decision, account access has been limited to offboarding processes, while automated withdrawals have been paused. The exchange said all withdrawal requests will now go through manual reviews and may be delayed, require additional information, or fail to be processed.
“We are not in a position to give assurances about timing or amounts today. No account holder or group of account holders is given priority outside the documented review process,” read the notice.
ZachXBT had previously shared on Telegram that several of the platform’s users were experiencing withdrawal delays for days or weeks, with some requests not being processed at all. The blockchain detective said his analysis found that AscendEX’s hot wallets had almost no reserves of major assets such as USDT, ETH, USDC, and SOL, leading him to believe that it was facing liquidity challenges.
Community reports corroborated the situation, with many individuals who had tried to move funds out of the exchange saying their transactions had been stuck in “initiating” for over a week. In a follow-up post, ZachXBT claimed that the platform has yet to process over 7 figures worth of transactions for its users.
He also urged the affected to take legal action by filing police reports and speaking to the relevant regulators in their countries to hold the platform accountable.
AscendEX Confirms Financial Issues
The exchange, founded in 2018 by George (Jing) Cao, was once a major crypto platform. However, AscendEX fell victim to a hack in December 2021 that drained about $78 million in digital assets.
In its statement, the firm said that its decision to shut down was heavily influenced by financial and operational issues, explaining that a strategic transaction meant to provide liquidity had failed. It added that market conditions had also contributed to the pressure, causing the company to assess its financial position and all available options for account holders.
The firm concluded by advising users to forward any complaints through its official channels and said that it would notify them of any next steps should insolvency proceedings be initiated.
The post ZachXBT Sounds Alarm Over AscendEX as Users Struggle to Withdraw Funds appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Binance CEO Says MiCA Is Backfiring as EU Users Move Beyond Regulators’ Reach
Binance co-CEO Richard Teng says the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) rules are backfiring, with most departing users moving funds into self-custody rather than to licensed rivals.
Speaking at the Reuters NEXT Asia summit in Singapore, Teng said 70% of funds withdrawn by affected EU users went to self-hosted wallets. Only 30% moved to platforms licensed under the new regime.
Binance Withdrew its MiCA Bid Before the July Deadline
Binance stopped serving new EU customers on July 1 after pulling its MiCA license application in Greece in late June. Teng said the approval was repeatedly delayed without explanation, so the company withdrew to avoid a rushed transition for users.
The exit forced existing customers to decide where to move their balances, and it coincided with its heaviest weekly outflows in more than three years. Binance’s own data on those flows now anchors Teng’s critique.
The debate lands as European authorities examine how the rules work in practice, including a MiCA custody review opened this week. Analysts have said enforcement, not the text, will be the framework’s real test.
Teng Warns Self-Custody Carries the Bigger Risk
Teng, a former regulator, argued that pushing users toward self-hosted wallets undercuts the protection MiCA was meant to deliver. Exchanges run anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) checks that non-custodial wallets do not.
“Once it goes into a self-hosted wallet, the risks actually amplify. You don’t have proper AML and KYC controls over those,” Richard Teng, Binance co-CEO, said.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
He said regulators gain more by licensing compliant firms than by driving activity beyond their view. Binance has since been invited to apply in other EU jurisdictions and says it remains committed to the region.
Supporters of self-custody read the same numbers differently. Holding private keys removes the counterparty risk exposed by past exchange failures, and many users treat direct control as a core feature rather than a loophole.
Similar arguments have reached Washington, where non-custodial wallet providers asked US regulators to spare self-custodial software from legacy rules.
Regulators are not blind to these transfers either. Europe’s expanding crypto travel rule already pushes exchanges to collect data on transactions involving self-hosted wallets.
Whether the split reflects a temporary reaction to Binance’s exit or a lasting turn toward self-custody will shape how regulators judge MiCA’s first results. The coming licensing decisions should provide the first hard evidence.
The post Binance CEO Says MiCA Is Backfiring as EU Users Move Beyond Regulators’ Reach appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Trump faces new Clarity Act test as Senate races toward key vote
The Senate has entered what could be its final practical window to advance the CLARITY Act this year, with a merged draft expected as early as next week before lawmakers run out of time ahead of the August recess.
Summary
- Senate negotiators are preparing a merged CLARITY Act draft ahead of a possible floor vote later this month.
- Democratic support remains uncertain as lawmakers continue talks over ethics rules, DeFi protections, and stablecoin provisions.
- The White House has denied blocking Democratic SEC and CFTC nominees as regulatory appointments become part of the debate.
According to a CoinDesk report, Senate negotiators are preparing updated legislative text that combines proposals from the Senate Banking and Agriculture committees into a single version of the crypto market structure bill.
The report said the draft is expected to add more than 70 pages of new material and place stronger focus on consumer protections alongside revisions negotiated over recent weeks.
With the Senate targeting possible floor action during the week of July 20, the legislative calendar has become increasingly compressed. Debate on the bill could take several days, leaving lawmakers with only a narrow period before the chamber begins its summer recess and attention turns toward the fall midterm campaign season.
The CLARITY Act would establish a federal framework for digital asset markets by defining how regulatory authority is divided between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
While the House approved its version of the legislation with bipartisan backing in 2025, the Senate has continued negotiating key provisions before bringing the measure to a vote.
Democratic support remains the biggest hurdle
Despite progress on the draft, the legislation still lacks the bipartisan backing needed to clear the Senate’s 60-vote threshold. According to CoinDesk, Democratic support remains uncertain as negotiations continue over several unresolved issues.
One of the largest sticking points is an ethics provision backed by Democratic lawmakers. The proposal would prevent senior government officials, including the president, from maintaining business interests connected to the cryptocurrency industry. Several senators have indicated they cannot support the final bill unless an agreement is reached on those restrictions.
CoinDesk also reported that the ethics debate is only one part of a broader negotiation. Outstanding issues still include Senate Agriculture Committee concerns, law enforcement requests involving legal protections for decentralized finance developers, and disagreements over stablecoin yield provisions.
Another section expected to receive fresh attention is federal preemption, which determines how much authority individual states would retain after a nationwide crypto regulatory framework takes effect.
Separately, staffing at the SEC and CFTC has become part of the broader political discussion surrounding the legislation. As crypto.news previously reported, the Trump White House rejected claims that it was refusing to nominate Democratic commissioners to either agency.
In a letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, the administration said it had already requested suitable Democratic nominees for both regulators but had not received any names.
Final negotiations continue before Senate debate
The appointments dispute has added another layer to negotiations because both the SEC and CFTC would receive expanded responsibilities if the CLARITY Act becomes law. As crypto.news previously reported, lawmakers are already working against the Senate’s Aug. 7 recess, leaving limited time to finalize the legislation.
Meanwhile, the decentralized finance industry is watching whether the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act remains part of the package. The provision would prevent developers who do not control customer assets from being classified as money transmitters, and support from Senator Ron Wyden has been viewed by industry advocates as a positive development this week.
Although negotiators are expected to unveil the merged draft shortly, the report noted that the legislation remains unfinished. The White House has not signed off on the latest version or participated in the most recent negotiations, while enough Democratic votes have yet to be secured for Senate passage.
Even if senators approve the revised bill, the House would still need to pass the updated text before it can be sent to President Donald Trump’s desk, leaving several procedural and political hurdles before the CLARITY Act can become law.
Crypto World
The Short Window Ahead of Bullski’s 5pm UTC Launch
The list of meme coins to buy usually comes with an open clock. This week it doesn’t. Bullski ($BULLSKI) opens stage one of its presale at 5pm UTC on Friday, July 10, and the run-up is short.
Until then, the one move that matters is free: claim a spot on the priority list through Bullski’s site so you enter stage one ahead of the public rush. Here’s what the window really is, what to do before Friday, and where the listed memes fit around the event.
What the Before-Friday Window Really Is
The window is short and specific. Bullski’s presale opens to the public at 5pm UTC this Friday, and the days before it are a reservation phase. Joining the free priority list holds your place so stage one starts with you already through the door.
That’s the entire trick to a launch with a hard date: the people who did the two-minute step early are the ones who buy at the opening price.
Myth: Buying before a launch means finding somewhere to buy the token early. Reality: there is nowhere to buy $BULLSKI before Friday, and any page that says otherwise is not Bullski. The move before Friday is the free reservation; the buying happens at stage one, once the presale is live.
The One With the Deadline
Bullski is the reason the deadline exists, and its numbers hold up under a clock. It’s an ERC-20 token on Ethereum with a fixed 120 billion supply, sold through a 16-stage presale where each stage prices higher than the last on the way to a $0.0025 listing reference. Stage one is the lowest rung on that ladder, and stage one is what opens Friday, July 10.
The checks are already in place, which matters more when a date is pushing you. The contract is verified on Etherscan, an audit is in process, and liquidity locks at launch. Staking starts with the first purchase, and a referral program pays holders for bringing people in.
A deadline with a paper trail behind it is a very different thing from a deadline alone.
The Listed Memes Around the Event
The big listed memes are context here, not competition. Dogecoin has traded through every cycle since 2013 and is still the category benchmark, though its supply keeps growing and its early window closed more than a decade ago. Shiba Inu built one of the largest holder communities in crypto.
Pepe proved in 2023 that a fresh meme coin can still run hard. All three are listed, which means you can buy them any day you like. None of them has a Friday.
The short window belongs to the coin that does.
Side by side, the split looks like this.
|
Move |
Before Friday |
After 5pm UTC |
|
Priority list |
Free to claim, holds your place |
Priority holders enter stage one first |
|
Buying $BULLSKI |
Not possible anywhere yet |
Live at stage one with ETH or USDT |
|
Wallet prep |
Set up MetaMask, add ETH or USDT |
Connect and buy in minutes |
|
Staking |
Not open before launch |
Available right after a stage-one buy |
That leaves a short list between now and Friday.
-
Set up an Ethereum wallet such as MetaMask and fund it with ETH or USDT for fees.
-
Claim your priority spot now instead of at five minutes to five on Friday.
-
Save the official Bullski links so launch day involves zero searching.
Watch Out: A ticking window is exactly when people skip their checks. The Friday date is real, but so are the fake pages that cluster around any launch drawing attention. Verify every link through Bullski’s official channels before you connect a wallet, however close to the deadline you get.
Beating the Window: Your Before-Friday Move
If the countdown has your attention, spend it in the right order. The reservation is the whole game between now and launch: it costs nothing, takes about two minutes, and decides whether you enter at the lowest stage price or wait behind the crowd that reserved earlier. Fund your wallet, then reserve your stage-one entry on the official site.
When the presale opens Friday evening UTC, priority holders step into stage one first, buy with ETH or USDT, and can stake their $BULLSKI straight away.
$250 USDT Giveaway: There’s one more free move before the window closes. Bullski’s Bullish by Default draw pays $250 USDT to one winner, picked at random, with no purchase needed. You can join the Bullski giveaway draw through the Telegram and X, and bringing a friend adds entries. Winners are announced only on the official channels, and the team will never ask for your wallet keys.
Meme Coins to Buy Before Friday FAQ
What meme coins should I buy before Friday?
Bullski is the one with an actual deadline attached: stage one of its 16-stage presale opens Friday, July 10 at 5pm UTC, and the free priority list is how you enter it first. DOGE, SHIB, and PEPE are the listed names around it, buyable any day. Do your own research before committing to any of them.
What can I actually do before the launch?
Three things. Claim your priority list spot, set up an Ethereum wallet with a little ETH or USDT, and save the official links so you’re not searching in a hurry on the day. There’s nothing to pay before launch; the buying starts at stage one.
What happens at 5pm UTC Friday?
Stage one of Bullski’s presale opens. Priority list holders enter first, buy $BULLSKI with ETH or USDT at the lowest price of the sixteen stages, and can stake right away. From there the presale climbs stage by stage toward its $0.0025 listing reference.
How do I reserve a stage-one entry?
Go to the official Bullski site and add yourself to the priority list; it takes moments. Then fund an Ethereum wallet and wait for July 10. When stage one opens, your reservation puts you ahead of the public queue.
For More Information
Website: Visit the official Bullski website at bullski.io
Telegram: Join the Bullski Telegram channel at t.me/BullskiCoinOfficial
X (Twitter): Follow Bullski on X at x.com/bullskicoin
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Crypto World
Robinhood chain hits $568M in trading frenzy, benefitting Arbitrum
Digital broker Robinhood’s new chain is off to a flying start, and the benefits are trickling to Ethereum-based network Arbitrum.
The native token of Arbitrum (ARB) jumped 19% over the past 24 hours, making it the best-performing asset in the top 100 cryptocurrency, according to CoinDesk data. Bitcoin edged 1.5% higher to trade above $63,000, while ether (ETH) was up 0.5% in an otherwise muted day.
The gains came as Robinhood Chain, built on top of Arbitrum’s technology stack and rolled out to the broader public a week ago, processed over $568 million in daily trading volume on Wednesday and logged over $350 million so far on Thursday, according to blockchain data from Entropy Advisors. Much of that activity was driven by a burst of memecoin trading, while stablecoin balances on the network also climbed quickly above $260 million within its first week.
The activity is translating into revenue for Arbitrum. Under the agreement, 10% of Robinhood Chain’s net protocol revenue flows back to the Arbitrum ecosystem, split between the DAO treasury and the Developer Guild.
Robinhood’s crypto push
Robinhood unveiled the chain at its London event last week as the centerpiece of a broader crypto push. The brokerage announced it would expand access to tokenized U.S. stocks to customers in more than 120 countries, launched a DeFi-powered savings vault offering yields through the lending protocol Morpho, and outlined plans to expand its crypto business into AI-powered trading and additional asset classes.
Crypto World
With SEC fight over, Coinbase’s top legal exec Grewal moves on, and others reassigned
Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal is leaving the company after its high-profile, years-long legal fight with U.S. regulators, and the U.S. exchange also announced further changes to its senior leadership.
Grewal is departing to work at a startup, according to a Thursday announcement from Coinbase. Molly Abraham will now lead the company’s legal team as general counsel, and Ryan Van Grack will become vice chairman, in what’s anticipated to be a broader and more public-facing role.
“Leading Coinbase’s legal team through the biggest fight of our industry has been the single greatest achievement of my six-year tenure,” Grewal said in a statement. “Our legal wins helped ensure crypto not only had a future in this country, but could flourish.”
His statement continued on to say he would continue as an adviser to Coinbase, and would work on Coinbase’s trust charter work through the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Abraham has been at Coinbase since March 2021, running multiple legal teams as the company’s vice president of legal. Prior to that, she was general counsel at an electric flying car startup, according to her LinkedIn.
Crypto World
Bitdeer Shares Rise 14% on US Mining Hardware Production Expansion
Bitdeer Technologies Group shares rose sharply on Thursday after the Bitcoin mining infrastructure company said it will build a new manufacturing facility in Nevada. The project is designed to expand US production capacity for Bitdeer’s mining hardware and, according to the company, reduce dependence on third-party suppliers.
The stock climbed 14.1% to $14.33, wiping out much of an earlier selloff in the week. Even with the rebound, Bitdeer remains about 27% below its June high, though it is up roughly 26% year-to-date.
Key takeaways
- Bitdeer plans to build a Nevada manufacturing facility in Sparks to assemble its SEALMINER mining machines.
- The plant is expected to begin commercial production by the end of the year.
- Bitdeer says the facility includes production of key mining hardware components, potentially lowering reliance on external hardware sources.
- While competitors push into AI and high-performance computing, Bitdeer’s Nevada expansion is specifically focused on mining hardware.
- Bitdeer also reported mining output of 921 BTC in May, representing a 370% increase versus the prior year.
Why a Nevada manufacturing push matters
Bitdeer’s announcement centers on a new facility in Sparks, Nevada, intended to assemble its SEALMINER line of Bitcoin mining equipment. The company says the site will also produce major components used in the machines, with commercial production slated to start by the end of the year.
For investors and mining-industry watchers, the importance of this shift is straightforward: hardware supply and lead times are often pivotal to mining operations, particularly when market demand accelerates. By bringing more manufacturing in-house within the US, Bitdeer is positioning itself to better control key parts of its supply chain rather than relying entirely on external vendors.
The facility also signals a broader strategic bet—mining infrastructure companies are increasingly expected to compete not only on hashrate and operating costs, but on the ability to scale equipment production reliably.
Incentives and local partnership cited by management
According to remarks attributed to Bitdeer CEO Catherine Guo by local media, the company worked with Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo’s administration and local authorities to secure tax incentives, including a reduction in qualifying sales taxes, as part of its decision to establish operations in the state.
These kinds of incentives can materially change the economics of industrial expansion, especially for manufacturing-heavy projects with significant upfront capital requirements. They also help explain why some mining-related manufacturers prioritize certain jurisdictions—cost structures and time-to-production can be decisive when trying to scale.
Bitdeer stays on hardware while rivals diversify
Bitdeer’s Nevada facility comes as several large Bitcoin miners and mining-adjacent companies broaden their businesses into AI, high-performance computing, and related digital infrastructure. In those cases, access to power and data center infrastructure can make it easier to pivot toward compute-intensive services beyond mining.
However, Bitdeer’s plans for Sparks are explicitly tied to Bitcoin mining hardware production rather than a broader AI-focused overhaul. The company has reportedly expanded into AI cloud services and high-performance computing, but the new Nevada plant is intended specifically for manufacturing SEALMINER equipment and components.
This creates an interesting contrast within the sector. While some publicly traded miners are using their infrastructure footprint to chase contracts in the AI ecosystem, Bitdeer is emphasizing the practical bottleneck on the mining side: getting capable hardware built and delivered at scale.
Earlier coverage from Cointelegraph has highlighted how the AI pivot among Bitcoin miners faces investor scrutiny, including concerns around insider sales. Against that backdrop, Bitdeer’s more narrow manufacturing focus may appeal to investors looking for tangible supply-chain expansion inside the core mining industry.
Output update underscores the company’s operating momentum
Alongside the manufacturing announcement, Bitdeer also provided a production update stating it mined 921 BTC in May. The company said this represented a 370% increase compared with the previous year.
That matters because new manufacturing capacity typically takes time to translate into higher throughput. In the meantime, investors often look for evidence that operations are already improving—either through added capacity, better utilization, or improved efficiency. Bitdeer’s May output increase offers some near-term confirmation that the company’s mining business is not only expanding on paper but also generating stronger results.
Even so, the market reaction to Thursday’s news suggests investors are treating the Nevada facility as more than incremental: the prospect of end-of-year commercial production could mark a meaningful step in the company’s ability to scale its hardware footprint.
Cointelegraph previously reported on how MARA Holdings announced plans to acquire a Texas site with up to 2 gigawatts of capacity to expand its AI and digital infrastructure business, and how TeraWulf signed a 20-year data center lease with Anthropic that the company said could generate roughly $19 billion in contract revenue. Those developments highlight how quickly many miners are moving toward AI-driven business models—even as hardware production remains central to the mining sector’s long-term competitiveness.
What to watch next
As Bitdeer works toward end-of-year commercial production in Nevada, the key question for investors is whether the facility meaningfully changes hardware availability, delivery timelines, and cost structure. The next signals to track are updated production metrics, progress on the manufacturing timeline, and any further detail on how the Nevada plant is expected to reduce dependency on third-party components.
Crypto World
Grayscale’s CFO exits after 7 years with crypto asset manager
Grayscale’s chief financial officer Edward McGee has stepped down after seven years at the crypto asset manager, becoming the latest senior executive to leave the company, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday.
McGee resigned effective July 2 for personal reasons and not because of “any disagreement with the company or its operations, policies or practices,” the filing said.
The company has named Kathryn Masci and Daniel Plourde as interim co-chief financial officers. Masci will also serve as principal financial and accounting officer and join the board of managers.
Masci joined Grayscale in 2020 and most recently served as senior vice president of finance.
Before that, she held finance and accounting roles at Garrison Capital, Pzena Investment Management and Ernst & Young. Plourde joined Grayscale in 2022 after senior positions at Gabelli Asset Management and State Street Global Advisors. He has also served as assistant treasurer of the Grayscale Funds Trust.
The leadership change follows another recent executive departure. Just weeks ago, managing director and head of distribution and partnerships John Hoffman left Grayscale to join tokenized asset platform Ondo Finance.
Crypto World
Prediction markets spark insider trading fears. How firms are responding
A supporter checks the gambling site ‘Kalshi” just before State Assembly member, Alex Bores (D-NY) gives a speech to supporters at his watch party at The Freehand Hotel after conceding the congressional race to Micah Lasher who will replace Rep Jerry Nadler (D-NY) in NY’s 12th Congressional District on June 23, 2026 in New York City.
Laura Brett | Getty Images
Insider trading is an emerging risk in the new world of prediction markets, and some companies – including Goldman Sachs – are taking steps to limit employees’ trades on the platforms.
Goldman Sachs has banned its employees from trading on contracts related to events that are specific to the bank, as well as elections, financial markets, macroeconomic data and geopolitics, according to people familiar with the matter.
A representative for Goldman declined to comment on the policy, but did state that the bank prohibits using material, nonpublic information to trade across all markets.
While some firms have started developing policies to managing insider trading risks on prediction markets, many others have yet to take those first steps, legal experts say.
“We are getting constant questions from clients, particularly among regulated entity clients, about what the regulator expectations are, what the risks are, where the areas of potential liability are,” said David Oliwenstein, a partner and securities enforcement practice lead at Pillsbury.
The Polymarket website on a smartphone arranged in Germantown, New York, US, on Tuesday, July 22, 2025.
Gabby Jones | Bloomberg | Getty Images
The news of an explicit prediction market trading directive at Goldman comes after the first event contract insider-trading case to involve a private sector company.
In May, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Department of Justice charged Google employee Michele Spagnuolo with using material, nonpublic information to trade on Polymarket contracts related to the browser’s “Year in Search” lists. Using the handle “AlphaRaccoon,” Spagnuolo allegedly collected about $1.2 million in profit, according to the CFTC’s complaint.
Legal experts said the sheer number of contracts available on prediction platforms may provide new avenues for material, nonpublic information to be used to turn a profit. For example, a Google employee could use internal data to trade on contracts about what the company’s headcount will be this year, when it may release a new version of its Gemini AI tool or where Alphabet’s share price will end the month.
A Polymarket advertisement in a subway station in New York, US, on Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026.
Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images
“All these different questions that you’re able to bet on… it makes it really hard to kind of play whack-a-mole in terms of where people are using the information they’ve obtained confidentially,” said Karen Woody, law professor at Washington and Lee University.
Lawyers told CNBC that as more insider trading on these platforms is caught and prosecuted, there will be greater expectations that businesses have sufficient policies and education to avoid any potential liability in a case involving one of their employees.
But lawyers also said they’re advising clients it’s nowhere near late, and companies should take this time now to develop the necessary policies.
Where companies stand
CNBC reached out to 50 publicly traded and privately held companies, which all have contracts regarding details about their businesses on prediction market platforms.
In total, only three revealed they have policies related to trading on prediction markets, while another two said it was something they were actively reviewing.
United Airlines told CNBC it does not have an explicit policy on prediction market trading, but that its employee guidelines “prohibit using your position (or company confidential information gained from your position) for your personal gain.”
A spokesperson for JPMorgan Chase confirmed a Barron’s report that employees are urged to proceed with caution when trading on prediction markets — particularly on contracts related to the financial sector.
At Morgan Stanley, a spokesperson said the bank has policies regarding trading on prediction markets in its employee code of conduct, but did not disclose further details.
Exterior view of a Bank of America branch on March 30, 2026 in Hanover, Maryland.
Heather Diehl | Getty Images
A person familiar with Bank of America’s plans told CNBC that the company was in the process of communicating updates to policy that will outline prohibited activities for employees and provide examples to help clarify expectations for trading on prediction market platforms. The person didn’t provide details about the specific changes to policy itself.
Banks appeared to be the sector most likely to respond that they were developing prediction market trading policies or already had one in place.
“Financial institutions, they have huge compliance departments,” said Lara Shortz, a partner at Michelman & Robinson in its labor and employment practice. “They spend a lot of time putting together policies related to trading and the use of information.”
Overall, 36 companies — including from sectors beyond just banks — did not respond to inquiries from CNBC regarding their prediction market trading policies for employees. Another seven declined to comment on the matter.
While CNBC cannot conclude exactly what these businesses that did not respond are doing, it matches what lawyers who work with companies on internal policy matters said: just a few companies have undertaken major policy changes so far, while many others are still in the early stages of any form of updates during the platform’s new, explosive rise.
“Right now, training is not necessarily the gold standard, just because it is new,” said Marissa Mastroianni, an employment law attorney at Cole Schotz.
What’s already on the books
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during morning trading on June 26, 2026 in New York City.
Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images
Some legal experts and company representatives argued that broad directives that ban insider trading inherently apply to prediction markets, too. A person familiar with OpenAI’s employee policies said that the company’s blanket insider trading policy is clear that staff cannot use material, nonpublic information in any way.
But Tiffany Magri, a regulatory advisor at compliance technology company Smarsh, said companies benefit from explicitly mentioning prediction markets in their policies.
“The question is no longer whether exchanges can detect suspicious trades,” she said. “It’s whether employers have established clear expectations around when employees should be prohibited from participating in markets tied to information they encounter through their work.”
To Magri’s point, leading prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket have taken steps on their own to crack down on insider trading.
Kalshi, in early June, announced new employment verification tools for participants on some prediction markets. That same month, it partnered with StarCompliance to allow employers with the partner’s software to access their employees’ event contract trades. To beef up its own internal oversight, the exchange partnered with Solidus Labs, a market integrity company, in February.
A Kalshi advertisement on a Metro train in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, June 17, 2026.
Daniel Heuer | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Polymarket highlighted its own partnerships in a statement to CNBC. Those include one with Chainalysis — an on-chain market enforcement company — and another with Palantir to monitor suspicious activity on its sports-related contracts.
But Magri noted these are just first steps, and that companies need to start training employees about the platforms rather than rely on the exchanges themselves to stop insider trading.
Both Kalshi and Polymarket declined to comment if they’re working with companies directly as they develop internal oversight and enforcement mechanisms.
Early days, growing urgency
Companies and the CFTC are jumping into new territory when confronting insider information on prediction markets.
On the prosecution front, Woody said the CFTC has a “blank canvas” on how it will go after insider trading. “I think what’s going to be interesting with the CFTC taking the lead here is that there aren’t a lot of cases to date yet in this space. It’s fairly new,” she said.
The CFTC did not respond to a request from CNBC to comment on whether it foresees companies becoming liable in the future for insider trading from their employees if they are deemed to have failed in educating them enough about it.
With lingering uncertainty on the regulatory side, companies should take the lead in rulemaking and learn how prediction markets work, said John Sullivan, professor of management at San Francisco State University.
Elevated view of staff working in a busy open plan office
monkeybusinessimages | iStock | Getty Images
Lawyers from King & Spalding LLP outlined steps companies can take in an article on Law360. Those include updating their insider trading policies to include event contracts and establishing protocols to monitor unusual activity on individual markets related to their businesses.
For even stricter measures, Sullivan told CNBC businesses should consider banning the platforms on company-owned devices and prevent employees from trading during work hours.
The foolish move would be to dismiss prediction markets’ relevance, he said. “It’s embarrassing not to have done anything or not to know about it.”
— CNBC’s Ashley Capoot contributed reporting
Disclosure: CNBC and Kalshi have a commercial relationship that includes customer acquisition and a minority investment.
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: High Hopes
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTaylor Swift and Travis Kelce wedding staffer hilariously struggles to keep her cool while checking in megastars
-
Crypto World6 days agoStandard Chartered Secures MiCA License as ESMA Adds 37 New Crypto Firms
-
Fashion3 days agoOpen Thread: What Great Books Have You Read Recently?
-
Politics6 days agoThe House | “Reframing the debate from a binary discussion of winners and losers”: Yuan Yang reviews ‘We Are Not Machines’
-
Fashion11 hours agoLoro Piana Fall 2026 Enters Houston’s Art Scene
-
News Videos3 days agoWhats Hidden Inside This Cash Register? #treasure #reselling #money
-
Tech3 days agoAnthropic’s new “J-lens” reveals a silent workspace inside Claude that mirrors a leading theory of consciousness
-
Crypto World6 days agoESMA Expands Crypto Register by 37 Firms Following MiCA Transition Period
-
Business3 days agoAXT Shares Jump Nearly 14% as Semiconductor Materials Maker Rebounds on AI-Linked Indium Phosphide Demand
-
Sports2 days agoJoshua Pacio ‘more complete’ ahead of ONE rematch vs Malachiev
-
Crypto World4 days agoSouth Africa proposes crypto tax guidance under existing rules
-
Crypto World3 days agoSK hynix (000660.KS) Stock Dips as $28B Nasdaq ADR Offering Drives AI Memory Expansion
-
News Videos3 days agoBest Time to Enter Small Caps Right Now? Another Bull Run? | Financially Free
-
Tech4 days agoLenovo laptops are now shipping with YMTC SSDs, a sign of Chinese NAND entering the mainstream
-
Business7 days agoWhat a 10 Percent Drop Means for Buyers, Sellers and Renters
-
Sports2 days ago
We have punished the disrespect
-
Crypto World7 days agoBinance Re-Enters Philippines As EU MiCA Rules Restrict Access
-
News Videos3 days agoAvoid entering in FOMO #bitcoin #cryptocurrency #trading #scalping
-
Crypto World7 days agoAlibaba bans Claude Code over alleged backdoor security concerns



You must be logged in to post a comment Login