Key Takeaways

• Q1 2026 earnings announcement scheduled for Monday, May 4, following market hours
• Analyst consensus points to $0.28 earnings per share, representing a 115% annual increase
• Anticipated revenue of $1.54 billion marks a 74% surge compared to last year
• Options market indicates approximately 10% volatility expected after earnings disclosure
• Shares have declined more than 20% year-to-date approaching the earnings release

---

Palantir is set to unveil its Q1 2026 financial performance on Monday, May 4, following the market close. Despite experiencing a decline exceeding 20% since the beginning of January, Wall Street analysts maintain optimistic projections for the data analytics company.

Palantir Technologies Inc., PLTR

Financial experts anticipate earnings per share of $0.28 for the three-month period, representing a substantial 115% increase compared to the corresponding quarter in 2025. Total revenue is forecast to reach an unprecedented $1.54 billion, marking a 74% year-over-year expansion.

Shares of PLTR concluded Thursday’s session trading around $138, while derivatives markets suggest potential price movement of approximately 9-10% in either trajectory by week’s end. This volatility estimate positions potential gains near $152 or potential losses approaching $126.

The year-to-date decline in PLTR stock has been attributed to widespread apprehension surrounding artificial intelligence software company valuations and concerns that the previous year’s extraordinary performance left shares trading at unsustainable levels.

Notwithstanding the recent downturn, the majority of equity analysts following the company maintain positive outlooks. Among nine analysts monitored by Visible Alpha, six recommend purchasing shares, with a consensus price objective approaching $201 — suggesting potential appreciation exceeding 40% from current trading levels.

Baird analyst William Power maintained his Outperform recommendation with a $200 price objective prior to the earnings announcement. He anticipates revenue expansion to continue for an 11th straight quarter, powered by robust performance across both U.S. Commercial operations and Government divisions.

Power additionally highlighted the recent price decline as a compelling opportunity for investors seeking exposure to high-growth technology companies.

Critical Metrics Under Scrutiny

Market participants will concentrate on commercial client expansion, uptake of Palantir’s Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP), and traction within government procurement contracts.

Management’s forward-looking statements will receive significant attention, especially any insights regarding the trajectory of U.S. federal government technology spending patterns.

Wedbush analysts communicated to investors their conviction that Palantir possesses “a golden path to become the next stalwart software company over the coming years.” Both Wedbush and Baird indicated they anticipate Palantir will surpass revenue projections.

Extended Time Horizon Projections

Baird’s Power forecasts sustained expansion extending through 2026 and into 2027. His financial models suggest free cash flow could climb to $7.5 billion by 2027 assuming consistent operational performance.

The aggregate Wall Street rating consensus stands at Hold, derived from 15 Hold recommendations, five Buy ratings, and two Sell assessments. The mean price target of $191.74 implies approximately 37.8% appreciation potential.

Palantir’s AIP platform has served as a fundamental catalyst for commercial business growth, and the Q1 financial results will provide fresh insights into whether this expansion trajectory has persisted throughout early 2026.

Key Takeaways

• Zscaler (ZS) surged up to 6.99% on May 1, propelled by impressive earnings reports and upward forecast revisions from SaaS companies like Atlassian and Twilio.
• Citizens Financial reduced ZS price target from $290 down to $210 while maintaining an Outperform rating.
• ZS shares were changing hands at $139.58, representing a 36.7% decline year-to-date and sitting 58.5% beneath the 52-week peak of $336.27.
• A recent KeyBanc CIO survey identified increasing cybersecurity budgets driven by AI deployment as a favorable catalyst for security platforms.
• The shares have experienced 18 price swings exceeding 5% in the past year, underscoring persistent volatility.

---

Zscaler (ZS) rallied by as much as 6.99% on May 1, benefiting from a broader surge of optimism across the software industry following robust quarterly reports from multiple industry counterparts.

Zscaler, Inc., ZS

Shares were valued at $139.58 entering the trading session — a valuation representing a 58.5% discount from the 52-week peak of $336.27, achieved in November 2025.

The primary driver wasn’t company-specific news. Atlassian upgraded its full-year guidance, triggering gains in its own shares while simultaneously boosting software names including Salesforce and ServiceNow.

Twilio contributed to the optimistic atmosphere after delivering first-quarter revenue exceeding analyst expectations and elevating its forward outlook, with leadership highlighting AI as a significant growth engine.

This type of industry momentum typically elevates related stocks across the board, and ZS benefited accordingly.

Citizens Lowers Price Target While Maintaining Positive Stance

May 1 wasn’t entirely favorable for Zscaler. Citizens Financial reduced its price objective on the shares to $210 from a previous $290.

The revision stemmed from apprehensions that advanced AI technologies could amplify cybersecurity risks and necessitate a reassessment of how the market values cybersecurity companies sector-wide.

Nevertheless, Citizens preserved its Outperform designation — indicating the firm continues to anticipate appreciation from present levels, despite evolving valuation complexities.

Demand for zero-trust architecture and SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) solutions, which form the foundation of Zscaler’s offerings, remains robust according to analysts.

AI Adoption and Security Spending Come Into View

Approximately ten days prior to the May 1 rally, ZS advanced 4.1% following a KeyBanc CIO survey revealing expanding cybersecurity budgets connected to AI implementation.

The research emphasized Anthropic’s Mythos AI framework as a component likely to stimulate heightened enterprise investment in security infrastructure throughout the coming year.

The rationale is clear: expanded AI deployment creates additional vulnerability points, and organizations are anticipated to allocate more resources toward protection.

This favorable trend has partially counterbalanced the headwinds Zscaler has encountered in 2026.

ZS ranks among the more significantly impacted cybersecurity stocks this year, declining 36.7% since the beginning of January.

The equity has registered 18 daily movements surpassing 5% over the trailing twelve months, demonstrating exceptional sensitivity to both sector developments and broader market fluctuations.

An investor who allocated $1,000 to Zscaler five years ago would currently hold approximately $772.93 in value.

The stock’s typical daily volume hovers just above 3 million shares, with a present market capitalization of $21.01 billion.

Citizens’ updated price objective of $210 continues to suggest substantial upside potential from the $139.58 trading level observed on May 1.

Key Takeaways

• WOLF shares reached a fresh 52-week peak at $36.60, climbing approximately 24.6% from Thursday’s closing price of $29.53
• Year-to-date gains total 70%, with shares up 34% over the trailing 12-month period
• The semiconductor manufacturer finalized a debt restructuring transaction, securing roughly $475.9 million in total gross funding
• Wall Street maintains a bearish “Reduce” consensus view, with analyst price targets averaging just $14.33
• Financial metrics show continued struggles, including a -14% gross margin and quarterly loss of ($6.11) per share

---

Shares of Wolfspeed surged to a new 52-week peak of $36.60 during Friday’s trading session, ultimately settling at $36.49 — representing an impressive single-day jump of approximately 24.6% compared to Thursday’s $29.53 close. Trading activity was robust, with more than 4.7 million shares exchanging hands throughout the session.

Wolfspeed, Inc., WOLF

This latest surge pushes WOLF’s year-to-date performance to an impressive 70% gain, while the stock has appreciated 34% when measured over a full year. The dramatic appreciation marks a significant reversal for shares that had previously hovered near their 50-day and 200-day moving average levels of approximately $20.60.

The explosive price action follows news of a significant balance sheet restructuring. Wolfspeed successfully completed a private placement transaction involving both convertible debt instruments and equity securities, generating total gross proceeds of approximately $475.9 million.

Those funds were immediately deployed to retire around $475.9 million worth of the company’s existing Senior Secured Notes scheduled to mature in 2030. The capital raise consisted of $379 million in new 3.5% Convertible 1.5 Lien Senior Secured Notes maturing in 2031, supplemented by roughly $96.9 million raised through common stock issuance and pre-funded warrant sales.

The transaction essentially provides the company with extended runway — and investors appear willing to reward management’s financial engineering, at least in the immediate term.

Wall Street Maintains Skeptical Stance

Despite the market euphoria, equity research analysts remain distinctly cautious on WOLF’s prospects. The Street’s consensus recommendation stands at “Reduce,” accompanied by an average 12-month price objective of $14.33 — representing substantial downside from current trading levels.

Among the six analysts actively covering Wolfspeed, just one maintains a Buy recommendation, two rate the stock at Hold, and three have assigned Sell ratings. Piper Sandler holds the most constructive view, maintaining its “Overweight” rating alongside a $20 price target. Susquehanna sits at “Neutral” with a matching $20 objective, while Weiss Ratings has issued a “Sell” recommendation.

The substantial disconnect between current market pricing and analyst expectations is striking.

Operating Performance Remains Challenged

The company’s operational results haven’t justified the market’s enthusiasm. Wolfspeed’s latest quarterly earnings report, released on January 28, revealed a loss of ($6.11) per share, dramatically missing the Street’s consensus forecast of ($0.74) by a margin of $5.37.

Quarterly revenues declined 6.6% on a year-over-year basis. The business continues to generate a negative gross profit margin of -14%, while sporting a price-to-earnings multiple of -5.23.

The company’s current market capitalization stands at approximately $1.66 billion.

InvestingPro data suggests potential undervaluation at present price levels, though the platform simultaneously highlights the firm’s ongoing profitability challenges.

Executive Restructuring Underway

Concurrent with the financial maneuvering, Wolfspeed unveiled several significant leadership transitions. Yasuhisa Harita has been tapped to assume the role of regional president for the Asia Pacific region, with responsibilities beginning June 1, 2026. Daihui Yu received appointment as regional president overseeing Greater China operations.

Brad Kohn will rejoin the organization in the capacity of Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Global Affairs Officer.

Meanwhile, institutional ownership patterns show increasing interest. Renesas Electronics America established a fresh position valued at approximately $293.4 million during Q4. Goldman Sachs expanded its holdings by 176.7% in Q1, while UBS Group dramatically increased its stake by over 3,400% in the fourth quarter.

TLDR:

• Kalshi prediction markets show Bitcoin leaning toward the $59K level amid rising risk sentiment.
• Geopolitical tensions and macro uncertainty continue shaping Bitcoin downside probability pricing.
• Solana and Dogecoin contracts mirror Bitcoin’s defensive bias across prediction markets data.
• Traders assign stronger odds to sub-$75K levels than upside breakout scenarios in the current cycle.

---

Bitcoin forecasted to drop to $59,000 amid geopolitical tensions: Kalshi signals renewed pressure on crypto markets as prediction traders price higher downside risk.

Sentiment across derivatives reflects cautious positioning while macro uncertainty and geopolitical developments continue shaping Bitcoin expectations globally.

Kalshi pricing signals rising downside pressure

Prediction markets on Kalshi show Bitcoin traders increasing odds of a move toward lower price zones. Recent pricing data places stronger weight on sub-$60,000 outcomes as sentiment turns defensive. Liquidity across contracts remains moderate, with positioning shifting toward hedging strategies.

Bitcoin is forecasted to drop to $59,000 amid geopolitical tensions: Kalshi’s narrative reflects broader risk aversion across digital assets. Solana and Dogecoin contracts mirror similar downside bias, with traders pricing weaker near-term momentum. 

Market participants continue adjusting exposure as macro uncertainty drives uneven liquidity across crypto markets. Geopolitical tensions continue shaping Bitcoin expectations as traders reassess risk exposure across global markets. 

Strait of Hormuz concerns and broader macro uncertainty have strengthened demand for defensive positioning in prediction markets. Bitcoin price behavior remains sensitive to liquidity shocks and external policy signals from major economies.

Prediction market data suggests traders are prioritizing downside protection over aggressive upside positioning in Bitcoin contracts. Safe haven flows into gold, and other assets continue to reduce speculative appetite in crypto markets overall recently. 

Technical analysis points toward key support clustering near the fifty-nine thousand dollar price region. Traders continue monitoring macro signals for directional clarity as volatility expectations remain elevated across market conditions.

Macro forces and range-bound Bitcoin expectations

Kalshi pricing shows Bitcoin expectations clustering within a defined trading range for near-term contracts. Upside probabilities remain present but weaken as price targets move above eighty-five thousand dollars.

Market participants assign a higher likelihood to moderate moves rather than sustained breakout scenarios in Bitcoin.

Downside probabilities remain structurally stronger, reflecting cautious positioning across derivatives and prediction market instruments currently priced in.

Liquidity conditions continue shaping probability distributions, especially in lower volume trading environments across crypto derivatives markets.

Short-term positioning reflects hedging activity rather than directional conviction among most market participants at current levels.

Overall price action remains contained within a narrow band as traders await clearer macro signals and emerging catalysts. 

Solana and Dogecoin markets continue reflecting similar sentiment trends aligned with Bitcoin positioning. Prediction markets show synchronized downside pricing across multiple major crypto assets.

Trading volumes remain moderate, with participants maintaining cautious exposure across derivatives. Macro uncertainty continues to influence positioning, with traders responding to geopolitical developments and interest rate expectations shifts globally presently. 

Market participants adjust exposure dynamically as prediction markets recalibrate probabilities across Bitcoin-related contracts within the current cycle phase range. 

Liquidity remains sufficient for orderly pricing, though sentiment tilts toward cautious engagement across crypto derivatives markets, as currently observed trends. Bitcoin forecasted to drop to $59,000 amid geopolitical tensions: Kalshi remains a central reference for trader sentiment analysis signals.

TLDR:

• PACTs allow Bitcoin holders to timestamp private key ownership off-chain, requiring no transaction or on-chain activity. 
• Satoshi Nakamoto holds over $75 billion in quantum-vulnerable Bitcoin addresses that a CRQC could potentially drain. 
• A STARK proof would let holders reclaim sunsetted funds by proving key knowledge existed before quantum computers arrived. 
• Multisig wallets, custodial setups, and complex scripts still require further standardization before PACTs can cover them.

---

Provable Address-Control Timestamps (PACTs) are a new scheme proposed by Paradigm researcher Dan Robinson.

The proposal offers Bitcoin holders a way to protect their assets from quantum computing threats. Robinson outlined the concept in a detailed post published on May 1, 2026.

The method allows holders to timestamp proof of key ownership without moving funds on-chain. It addresses a long-standing tension between privacy and security in any future quantum upgrade.

What the PACT Proposal Actually Does

PACTs work by letting holders create a silent, off-chain commitment tied to their private keys. The holder generates a random salt and uses BIP-322 to sign a standardized message proving address control.

That signed message is then hashed into a commitment and timestamped using OpenTimestamps, a free and open-source service.

No Bitcoin transaction is required for this process. OpenTimestamps batches many commitments into a single transaction on the Bitcoin blockchain. This makes the cost of participating effectively zero for individual holders.

Robinson described the Bitcoin network itself as the foundation for this approach, noting that Satoshi Nakamoto had already built the tool needed.

As Robinson wrote, the Bitcoin whitepaper described the network as a “distributed timestamp server,” a function that goes beyond recording transactions.

The commitment reveals nothing about the holder’s address, public key, or wallet balance. Only an opaque hash is published, keeping the entire process private.

Holders must store the salt, the BIP-322 proof, and the OTS file securely, as these become the foundation for any future rescue claim.

The Quantum Sunset Problem and Why It Matters

Bitcoin addresses with exposed public keys are vulnerable to cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs).

Addresses that have previously sent transactions, thereby revealing their public key, face the greatest risk. Robinson estimates that Satoshi Nakamoto alone holds around 1.1 million BTC in such addresses, worth over $75 billion today.

A “quantum sunset” refers to a potential soft fork that would freeze spending from quantum-vulnerable addresses.

Robinson warned of what inaction could mean, writing that without a sunset, “those holders will be forced to move those coins or let them be stolen.”

The problem is that a sunset forces dormant holders into a difficult position. They must either move their coins publicly, revealing identity and activity, or risk losing access entirely.

Robinson pointed out that “for an early holder like Satoshi, this would be a massive revelation — they would have to tell the world that they are alive and still in possession of their keys.”

PACTs offer a third path. Holders can record their ownership secretly now, then use a zero-knowledge proof later to claim coins under a rescue protocol, if Bitcoin ever adopts one. This separates the act of proving ownership from the act of moving funds publicly.

Rescue Process and Protocol Limitations

If Bitcoin adopts a sunset and a PACT-based rescue path, spending would require a STARK proof. This proof would confirm the holder knew the private key before a defined cutoff date. It would also bind to a specific rescue transaction to prevent replay attacks.

Robinson framed this in practical terms, describing a hypothetical scenario in which Satoshi returns in 2040. He wrote that if Satoshi “had the foresight back in 2026, he could have used a cryptographic timestamping service to timestamp a signature, establishing that he knew the private key before CRQCs existed.”

The salt and BIP-322 proof would never be revealed during a rescue claim. Only the cryptographic proof of their existence would be submitted to the network, maintaining privacy even through the redemption process.

There are real limitations to this approach. Robinson acknowledged that “multisig, complex scripts, custodial wallets, and hardware-wallet support would need careful standardization.”

There is also no guarantee Bitcoin will ever adopt this rescue mechanism, meaning holders should not treat PACTs as a substitute for migrating to quantum-safe addresses once those become available.

What is the Cricket Road Game Casino?

The cricket road game casino is an online betting platform that mixes classic casino games with a cricket‑themed interface. It targets fans who enjoy the sport and want to place bets on matches, while also offering slots, live dealer tables and a sports‑betting section. The site is licensed by a recognised European authority, which means the games are audited for fairness and the software runs on a reputable RTP (return‑to‑player) engine. For Indian users the design includes local language snippets and payment options that work with Indian rupees, so the experience feels native rather than a generic offshore portal.

Beyond the visual theme, the casino functions like any other regulated gambling site – you create an account, verify your identity, deposit funds and then can claim bonuses. The “cricket road” part is mostly branding, but it does affect the promotions calendar: during major tournaments you’ll see special cricket‑related bonus codes and free bet offers. This makes the platform attractive for both seasoned punters and beginners who are just learning the ropes of online gaming.

How to Register and Get Started on the Cricket Road Game Casino

Signing up is straightforward: click the “Join Now” button, fill in your name, email and a strong password, then confirm the registration link sent to your inbox. After the basic registration you’ll be prompted to complete KYC (Know Your Customer) verification – a copy of your ID, a proof of address and a selfie are usually enough. The verification step can feel a bit tedious, but it protects you from fraud and speeds up future withdrawals.

Once your account is verified you can explore the lobby, claim the welcome bonus and even try the demo version of the site. You can try the demo version here: https://cricket-roads.com/demo/. The demo does not require a deposit, so you can test the game flow before committing real money. Remember to set a personal deposit limit during registration – it’s a good habit for responsible gambling.

Welcome Bonuses and Wagering Requirements

The casino offers a layered welcome package that combines a match bonus, free spins and a cricket‑specific betting credit. Most Indian players find the 100% match up to ₹25,000 plus 50 free spins on a cricket‑themed slot to be the most appealing part. However, each bonus comes with wagering requirements – typically 30x the bonus amount before any winnings can be withdrawn.

Below is a quick comparison of the main welcome offers you’ll encounter on the cricket road game casino platform:

Bonus Type	Maximum Value	Wagering Requirement	Expiry
Match Deposit Bonus	₹25,000	30x	30 days
Free Spins	50 spins	20x win amount	7 days
Cricket Bet Credit	₹5,000	15x stake	14 days

Always read the fine print – some games contribute only 10% towards the wagering, while others count 100%. Choosing low‑variance slots for the free spins can help you meet the requirements faster without risking your bankroll.

Payment Methods and Withdrawal Speed for Indian Users

Depositing funds into the cricket road game casino is simple thanks to a wide range of Indian‑friendly payment methods. You can use net banking (HDFC, ICICI, SBI), UPI, popular e‑wallets like Paytm, PhonePe and even prepaid cards. Most deposits are processed instantly, allowing you to start playing within minutes of confirming the transaction.

Withdrawals, on the other hand, depend on the method you choose. E‑wallets usually deliver money within 24‑48 hours, while bank transfers may take 3‑5 business days. The casino does not charge a fee for withdrawals, but your bank might apply a nominal service charge. Below is a short list of the most common deposit and withdrawal options:

• Net Banking – instant deposit, 3‑5 days withdrawal
• UPI – instant deposit, 1‑2 days withdrawal
• Paytm/PhonePe – instant deposit, 24‑48 h withdrawal
• Prepaid Cards – instant deposit, 2‑4 days withdrawal

Before you request a payout, ensure your account is fully verified; otherwise the casino may hold the funds until the documents are approved. Keeping a copy of the transaction receipt can speed up the support process if any issues arise.

Mobile Experience: App and Browser Play

Most Indian players prefer gaming on the go, and the cricket road game casino delivers a responsive mobile website that works on both Android and iOS browsers. The layout adapts to smaller screens without losing functionality – you still have access to the live casino, sports betting and the full bonus section.

For those who want a native feel, the casino offers a downloadable app available from the Play Store. The app supports push notifications for match‑day promotions, quick deposit shortcuts and fingerprint login for added security. It also respects the same responsible‑gambling tools as the desktop version – you can set daily limits, self‑exclude, or take a cooling‑off break directly from the mobile menu.

Security, Licensing and Fair Play

The cricket road game casino operates under a licence from the Malta Gaming Authority, a regulator known for strict player protection rules. All data transmission is encrypted with SSL 256‑bit technology, which means your personal details and payment information are shielded from prying eyes. The casino also employs third‑party auditors to verify the RNG (random number generator) used in slots and table games.

In addition to technical security, the platform runs a responsible‑gambling programme that includes deposit limits, loss limits and easy self‑exclusion. If you ever feel you need help, the site links to Indian support organisations such as the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG). This combination of licensing, encryption and player‑centred tools makes the environment safe for both new and experienced gamblers.

Live Casino and Sports Betting Options

Beyond the standard slots, the cricket road game casino hosts a live dealer section where you can play blackjack, roulette and baccarat with real‑time dealers. The live streams are HD and feature professional croupiers who speak English, making the experience feel like a brick‑and‑mortar casino in Mumbai. For cricket fans, there is a dedicated sports‑betting hub that covers international tours, IPL, and even domestic T20 leagues.

The betting market includes traditional options such as match winner, run‑line and top batsman, as well as in‑play bets that update every few seconds. Odds are competitive, and the platform offers a “cash‑out” feature that lets you settle a bet before the match ends – useful if you want to lock in profit or limit loss during a volatile game.

Customer Support and Responsible Gambling

Support is available 24/7 via live chat, email and a toll‑free number that works across India. The live chat is usually answered within a minute, and agents are trained to handle queries about bonuses, payment issues and account verification. If you have a dispute about a wager, you can open a ticket and the casino’s dispute resolution team will investigate within 48 hours.

Responsible gambling is woven into the user journey. On the account dashboard you will find a “Responsible Play” tab where you can set deposit caps, limit session time, or opt for a temporary self‑exclusion of 7, 30 or 90 days. The site also offers an educational hub with articles on how to gamble safely and links to professional counselling services.

Frequently Asked Questions About Cricket Road Game Casino

• Can I use my Indian rupee for deposits? Yes, the platform accepts INR through net banking, UPI and popular e‑wallets.
• Is the casino licensed? It holds a Malta Gaming Authority licence, which ensures fair play and player protection.
• How long do withdrawals take? E‑wallet withdrawals are usually processed within 24‑48 hours; bank transfers may need 3‑5 business days.
• Are there any restrictions for Indian players? The casino accepts Indian IP addresses and does not block access, but you must be 21 years or older.
• What should I do if I develop a gambling problem? Use the responsible gambling tools in your account or contact the NCPG for confidential help.

TLDR:

• Taiwan legislator Dr. Ko Ju-Chun formally presented a Bitcoin reserve report to the premier on April 29. 
• Over 80% of Taiwan’s $602B reserves are in U.S. dollar assets, raising concentration and debasement risks. 
• The Bitcoin Policy Institute argues Bitcoin resists seizure and operates outside sovereign monetary control. 
• Taiwan’s central bank has one month to submit a new report covering stablecoins and digital asset reserves.
  

---

Taiwan’s push for a Bitcoin reserve entered a new phase on April 29 when legislator Dr. Ko Ju-Chun formally presented a policy report to Premier Cho Jung-tai and Central Bank of China Governor Yang Chin-long.

The report, produced by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, urges the government to allocate a share of Taiwan’s $602 billion in foreign exchange holdings to Bitcoin.

The move signals growing momentum for digital asset integration within Taiwan’s financial policymaking circles.

Legislative Action Brings Bitcoin Reserve Debate to the Forefront

The formal session took place within Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan, which operates under the country’s semi-presidential system.

In that structure, the premier holds considerable authority over domestic economic policy. Dr. Ko presented the BPI report during an official interpellation session, making it the first time the document reached the premier directly.

Ko first raised these ideas with the central bank governor during a separate session on March 30. The April 29 session escalated the conversation by including the head of government.

Ko also requested that the CBC produce a new report within one month, covering stablecoins and broader digital asset reserve strategies.

The BPI report was written by BPI Fellow Jacob Langenkamp and published in March 2026. It draws attention to the fact that over 80% of Taiwan’s reserves are held in U.S. dollar-denominated assets.

This concentration creates exposure to currency debasement and potential geopolitical disruption, according to the report’s findings.

Langenkamp elaborated on why Bitcoin stands apart from traditional reserve assets, stating: “Taiwan faces a unique convergence of geopolitical risk and reserve concentration that makes the case for Bitcoin reserves especially compelling.”

He further explained that conventional assets fall short under extreme conditions, adding that “in a scenario where physical gold is stranded and dollar reserves face restrictions, Bitcoin remains fully accessible without physical transport.”

Central Bank History and the Road Ahead

Taiwan’s central bank had previously evaluated Bitcoin as a reserve asset in late 2025. At that time, the CBC concluded it was unsuitable, pointing to concerns around volatility, limited liquidity, and custody risks. However, the CBC also committed to a digital asset sandbox, using 210 seized Bitcoin to run future testing.

That earlier conclusion has not stopped lawmakers from revisiting the issue. Dr. Ko, who serves as vice co-chair of the Legislative Yuan’s US-Taiwan Caucus and founder of the Emerging Technology Exchange Association, has continued to push for a structured policy review. His follow-through demonstrates that the conversation is not fading.

Reflecting on the broader reach of BPI’s research, Sam Lyman, head of research at the Bitcoin Policy Institute, pointed to the weight of Ko’s actions: “BPI’s research is reaching the highest levels of government, both here in the United States and abroad.”

He added that the legislator’s direct presentation to Taiwan’s top officials showed how seriously Bitcoin is now being considered as a strategic asset, noting: “Our job is to educate the public on the benefits of Bitcoin, and this report is in furtherance of that goal.”

The CBC’s one-month deadline to respond on stablecoins and digital asset reserves sets a concrete timeline. Whether the bank revises its earlier position or defends it will likely shape the next phase of this policy debate in Taiwan.

A16z has thrown its weight behind the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in a growing federal-state standoff over prediction markets, opposing state regulators that try to shut down platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket.

The venture capital heavyweight submitted the letter on Thursday in response to the CFTC’s advance notice of proposed rulemaking on prediction markets. It argues that state-level crackdowns, ranging from cease-and-desist letters to criminal charges, are creating barriers that undermine the federal agency’s mandate to provide “impartial access to its markets and services.”

In recent weeks alone, the CFTC has filed lawsuits against Illinois, Arizona, Connecticut, New York and Wisconsin, claiming that those states overstepped by trying to regulate markets that fall under federal jurisdiction. A16z backed that position, arguing that forcing exchanges to block users based on their state of residence directly conflicts with the CFTC’s impartial access rules.

“Being forced to deny impartial access to users in states that seek to license or prohibit certain event contracts will likely severely circumscribe available liquidity,” the firm wrote.

Related: Prediction market battle gets closer to Supreme Court

CFTC gets to define gaming: A16z

State attorneys general have countered that platforms offering contracts on sports outcomes and political events are running unlicensed gambling operations. A16z pushed back on that framing, arguing that the CFTC, not state legislatures, holds the authority to define what constitutes “gaming” under federal commodities law, given the agency’s decades of oversight over event contracts.

Beyond the jurisdictional fight, a16z also made a case for the social value of prediction markets, describing their pricing mechanisms as a distinct form of price discovery that surfaces crowd intelligence on uncertain outcomes. The firm also showed support for blockchain-based platforms, claiming that the onchain auditability of transactions makes regulatory oversight more effective.

Kalshi and Polymarket trading volume. Source: Token Terminal

The letter arrives amid the growing popularity of these platforms. As Cointelegraph reported, monthly trading volume reached $25.7 billion in March, with more than 80% of users classified as retail, defined as those trading less than $10,000.

Related: Kalshi, Polymarket among 27 prediction platforms banned in Brazil

Polymarket wants back into the US

Polymarket is in talks with the CFTC to lift the ban that has kept American users off its main platform since a 2022 settlement, in which the company paid a $1.4 million penalty and agreed to block US customers over unregistered event contracts.

A full return would require a formal commission vote, though the process may move faster given that four of the CFTC’s commissioner seats are currently vacant.

Magazine: How to fix suspected insider trading on Polymarket and Kalshi

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Key Takeaways

• Advanced Micro Devices announces Q1 2026 results after Tuesday’s closing bell on May 5
• Analyst consensus targets earnings per share of $1.28 and sales of $9.88 billion, representing approximately 33% year-over-year increases
• Options market pricing suggests potential stock movement of 8% in either direction post-earnings
• RBC Capital increased its price objective to $325 while maintaining a Hold stance due to valuation metrics
• D.A. Davidson elevated AMD to Buy with a $375 price target, highlighting robust CPU momentum driven by agentic AI applications

---

Advanced Micro Devices enters its Q1 earnings announcement with significant upward momentum. Shares have surged approximately 70% since the start of 2026, reaching all-time peaks as artificial intelligence hardware demand continues its relentless expansion.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., AMD

The semiconductor manufacturer releases first-quarter 2026 financial results following Tuesday’s market close on May 5. Wall Street consensus calls for quarterly revenue reaching $9.88 billion alongside adjusted earnings per share of $1.28—both metrics showing approximately 33% growth compared to the same period last year.

The options market provides insight into expected volatility: derivatives pricing indicates traders are positioning for movement up to 8% in either direction through week’s end. With shares settling Friday just above the $360 level, this projected range establishes an upside target near $389 and a downside floor around $331.

The chipmaker’s recent surge has been amplified by freshly inked collaborations with Anthropic and Meta. These strategic partnerships have strengthened the bullish narrative that AMD maintains a central position in the ongoing AI infrastructure expansion.

Wall Street Price Targets Reflect Mixed Sentiment

RBC Capital analyst Srini Pajjuri elevated his price objective from $230 to $325 in advance of the report while retaining his Hold recommendation. He anticipates the company will deliver results exceeding expectations with modestly raised guidance. His primary reservation centers on valuation metrics—AMD currently commands approximately 33x projected 2027 earnings, representing a 75% premium versus Nvidia’s multiple.

Pajjuri identified wafer supply bottlenecks as a constraining factor and notes AMD’s CPU market position trails Intel’s—implying reduced upside leverage from that segment’s recovery.

D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria adopted a more optimistic stance. Following Intel’s impressive Q1 performance, Luria upgraded AMD to Buy while boosting his target from $220 to $375. He interprets Intel’s exceptional quarter as a direct indicator for AMD’s CPU business trajectory.

Luria’s investment thesis emphasizes agentic AI workloads. He referenced Intel CEO Pat Tan’s observation that GPU-to-CPU ratios for pretraining applications—traditionally around 8:1—are trending toward equilibrium as artificial intelligence shifts toward inference and agentic computing tasks. This transition represents a substantial demand catalyst for AMD’s EPYC processor lineup.

Revenue Projections See Upward Revisions

Luria increased his 2026 revenue forecast for AMD by $2 billion while elevating his gross profit projection by $1.5 billion—substantially exceeding consensus estimates. His analysis suggests AMD possesses pricing power across its product range as demand persistently outstrips available supply.

He additionally highlighted Intel CFO David Zinsner’s commentary indicating the semiconductor industry could experience double-digit growth with momentum carrying through 2027.

Regarding AI accelerators, analysts widely anticipate AMD will confirm the deployment timeline for its MI4xx Helios GPU series at OpenAI and Meta. Such confirmation would prove significant for investors monitoring AMD’s efforts to narrow Nvidia’s lead in the data center graphics processor market.

Consensus sentiment on Wall Street: Moderate Buy recommendation, with 19 analysts rating the stock as Buy and nine maintaining Hold positions. The mean price target of $300 trails the current trading level, indicating AMD’s recent rally has surpassed numerous analyst projections.

First-quarter results arrive Tuesday following the market close.

According to Cointelegraph, Andreessen Horowitz (A16z) has publicly aligned with the CFTC in a high-stakes federal-state dispute over prediction markets. In a letter filed on Thursday in response to the CFTC’s advance notice of proposed rulemaking on prediction markets, the venture capital firm urged that aggressive state enforcement—ranging from cease-and-desist letters to criminal charges—undermines the federal regulator’s mandate to provide impartial access to its markets and services.

The filing comes amid a broader push by the CFTC to assert federal oversight over event contracts while state attorneys general and regulators seek to apply their own licensing and gambling laws. In recent weeks, the CFTC has sued several states—Illinois, Arizona, Connecticut, New York, and Wisconsin—arguing that those jurisdictions overstep by attempting to regulate prediction markets that, the regulator says, fall under federal jurisdiction. A16z supported the position that forcing exchanges to block users based on state residency directly conflicts with the CFTC’s impartial access principles. The letter thus positions the debate as a core clash over jurisdiction, access, and the proper scope of regulatory authority for event- and outcome-related contracts.

“Being forced to deny impartial access to users in states that seek to license or prohibit certain event contracts will likely severely circumscribe available liquidity,” the firm wrote. The stance reinforces a broader debate about whether prediction-market platforms should be treated as regulated financial markets or as something else entirely, and it underscores the attention paid by major investors to the regulatory architecture around these platforms. The discussion surrounding the CFTC’s rulemaking follows a period of rapid growth for prediction markets, with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket at the center of policy and compliance debates.

Key takeaways

• The A16z letter explicitly backs the CFTC’s pursuit of federal oversight and argues that state crackdowns undermine impartial access to prediction-market platforms.
• The CFTC has pursued lawsuits against Illinois, Arizona, Connecticut, New York, and Wisconsin, signaling a persistent federated-state conflict over how these markets should be regulated.
• A16z rejects narratives that characterize prediction-market platforms as unlicensed gambling, asserting that the CFTC—not state legislatures—defines what constitutes “gaming” under federal commodities law.
• The firm highlights on-chain transaction auditability as a potential contributor to more effective regulatory oversight and compliance controls.
• Polymarket seeks a path to reintroduce US users to its main platform; a full return would require a formal vote by the CFTC’s commissioners, a process potentially accelerated by vacant commissioner seats.
• Market activity in prediction markets remains substantial, with March monthly volume reported around $25.7 billion and a predominantly retail user base.

Federal-state clash over prediction markets and A16z’s stance

The core dispute centers on who should regulate event contracts and how their markets should be accessed by participants across state lines. A16z’s letter frames the issue as a test of whether federal authority, via the CFTC, should ensure uniform, impartial access to prediction-market platforms, or whether state authorities may condition access through licensing requirements or outright bans. By arguing that state-level restrictions impede liquidity and price discovery, the firm positions the CFTC’s access rules as essential to the health and integrity of the market ecosystem. The letter—submitted in the context of the CFTC’s advanced rulemaking process—asserts that federal oversight serves the public interest by maintaining open, fair, and auditable markets for uncertain outcomes.

Kalshi and Polymarket, as prominent platforms in this space, are frequently cited as case studies illustrating the tensions between state licensing approaches and federal market design. The stance taken by A16z aligns with a view that state remedies, when they seek to bar or restrict users based on residency, may undermine the cross-border liquidity and efficiency that federal markets are designed to sustain. The broader regulatory environment has underscored a growing expectation that the industry needs clear, stable federal guidelines to avoid a patchwork of state actions that could fragment liquidity and complicate compliance for operators and participants alike.

Jurisdiction: CFTC vs. state regulators on gaming and event contracts

A key dimension of the debate concerns how to classify and regulate event contracts. State attorneys general have argued that platforms offering bets on sports results or political events operate unlicensed gambling businesses. A16z countered by emphasizing the CFTC’s historical role in overseeing event contracts under federal commodities law, arguing that this authority should define what constitutes “gaming” for purposes of regulation. In this framing, the CFTC’s jurisdiction is not just a matter of policy preference but a statutory and regulatory reality that governs how these products can be offered and who can participate.

Beyond jurisdictional questions, A16z highlighted the social value of prediction markets as price-discovery mechanisms that aggregate crowd intelligence on uncertain outcomes. The firm also contended that blockchain-based platforms, with their on-chain transparency and auditability, offer regulatory oversight advantages that can enhance compliance and risk management for both operators and overseers. This angle ties regulatory considerations to the evolving infrastructure of the market—where on-chain records and verifiable transactions could support more robust enforcement and oversight mechanisms.

Policy implications, liquidity, and compliance considerations

The regulatory discourse surrounding prediction markets matters for a range of market participants, including exchanges, banks, investors, and technology providers. The federal-state friction affects licensing, access controls, and the ability of platforms to offer services across state lines. For operators, this translates into regulatory uncertainty, potential licensing costs, and the risk of abrupt changes in permissible activities. For regulators, the interplay between state-level attempts to regulate and federal authority raises questions about the optimal architecture for consumer protection, market integrity, and financial stability in markets that hinge on uncertain outcomes.

Market activity figures cited in industry coverage illustrate the scale of engagement in prediction markets. March data indicate monthly trading volumes in the tens of billions of dollars, with a majority of participants categorized as retail traders—defined as individuals trading smaller ticket sizes. This usage profile underscores the practical importance of predictable access and consistent regulatory treatment for liquidity provision, price discovery, and consumer protections. The onus is on policymakers to provide clarity that can support legitimate market activity while upholding compliance standards across jurisdictions.

Polymarket’s current status reflects the ongoing regulatory negotiation. After a 2022 settlement that included a $1.4 million penalty and a block on US customers for unregistered event contracts, Polymarket is engaging with the CFTC to explore a pathway for reinstating US access to its main platform. While a complete regulatory green light would require a formal commission vote, the context of several commission seats remaining vacant could accelerate consideration, depending on procedural timelines and regulatory priorities. This case illustrates how enforcement actions, settlements, and rulemaking interact to shape the practical feasibility of cross-border platform operations in the United States.

Closing perspective

The evolving policy framework for prediction markets sits at the intersection of federal oversight, state enforcement, and the assessment of how blockchain-enabled platforms can support compliant, transparent price discovery. As authorities refine rules and as large investors advocate for clear federal guidance, the coming months are likely to determine whether US-based prediction markets achieve broader access while maintaining robust governance and consumer protections. Observers should watch for CFTC rulemaking outcomes, any further regulatory actions, and the potential implications for Kalshi, Polymarket, and other platforms operating in this space.