Ripple has received full authorization under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework after Luxembourg’s financial regulator granted the company a Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) license. The approval follows Ripple’s preliminary CASP approval earlier this year and, according to the company, completes its transition into the “post-transitional” MiCA regime.

The CASP authorization, combined with Ripple’s existing Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license, allows the blockchain payments firm to provide regulated crypto-asset services across the European Economic Area (EEA) under EU rules.

Key takeaways

• Ripple secured a CASP license in Luxembourg, completing its full MiCA authorization after preliminary approval in June.
• The authorization enables regulated crypto-asset services across the EEA, supported by Ripple’s existing EMI license.
• Ripple says it is among a relatively small group of firms fully authorized under MiCA.
• MiCA enforcement has begun across the EU, with ESMA maintaining an updated register of licensed providers and national regulators handling supervision.
• ESMA’s latest CASP register shows licensed providers rising to 280 after 37 firms were added following the July 1 transition deadline.

Ripple’s MiCA authorization and what it enables

Ripple said it has now obtained full authorization under MiCA after Luxembourg’s regulator granted it a CASP license. The company previously received preliminary approval in June, and Ripple framed the new authorization as the end of its transition period under the EU framework.

In a statement, Cassie Craddock, Ripple’s managing director for the United Kingdom and Europe, said the CASP authorization means Ripple is “fully compliant” with MiCA and prepared to scale its operations.

For market participants, the practical significance of a MiCA CASP license is that it positions a crypto-asset service provider to operate as a regulated entity inside the EU’s MiCA system. Ripple’s mention of its additional EMI license is notable because it reflects that the company is not relying solely on the crypto-asset authorization path; instead, it brings together licensing coverage that can support a broader regulated service offering.

From transition to enforcement: MiCA’s July 1 deadline

Ripple’s authorization comes after the EU’s MiCA transition period ended on July 1. Under the framework, firms offering regulated crypto-asset services in the bloc needed authorization; otherwise, they were expected to stop offering such services.

MiCA also introduces an important structural change for authorized providers: in many cases, a single authorization can support “passporting” across the EEA, reducing the need for separate approvals in each member state. That is the mechanism Ripple is effectively leaning on, given its statement that it can offer regulated crypto-asset services across the EEA.

While licensing outcomes have improved since the deadline, the enforcement phase is now active. ESMA coordinates aspects of supervision through the register of authorized entities, but the day-to-day regulatory enforcement is carried out by national authorities—meaning implementation and pressure levels can differ across EU member states.

ESMA register update: licensed CASPs rise to 280

According to ESMA’s updated register, the number of licensed crypto-asset service providers stands at 280. The figure increased from 243 a week earlier after 37 additional companies were added, including Standard Chartered, FalconX and Sygnum Europe, as reported in the coverage linked from Cointelegraph.

This incremental jump matters for investors and counterparties because ESMA’s register acts as a key reference point for determining which entities are authorized to operate under MiCA. However, the register’s growth also highlights the uneven pace of authorization as firms work through licensing processes close to major deadlines.

Not all major players secured authorization before July 1. The source notes that Binance withdrew its MiCA application in Greece ahead of the transition and said it would pursue authorization elsewhere while working toward compliance.

Regulators step up: Belgium highlights unauthorized providers

With MiCA moving into enforcement, regulators at the member-state level have begun taking action. Belgium’s Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) has already started applying the new rules.

On Monday, FSMA identified six crypto-asset service providers that it said were operating without authorization and added them to its list of unauthorized crypto-asset service providers, according to the coverage linked from Cointelegraph. The regulator also issued warnings to consumers and market participants about unauthorized platforms, underscoring that the transition is no longer a planning phase—it is an active compliance test.

For users and institutions working with EU-facing crypto service providers, this is a reminder that regulatory status is becoming a central operational variable. Authorization and supervision may be decisive factors for risk management, counterparties, and product availability.

Looking ahead, the key watch items are how quickly the authorization gap closes across remaining providers, how national regulators interpret and apply MiCA enforcement in practice, and whether additional major exchanges and service platforms reach full CASP authorization under the EU framework.

Bitcoin miner TeraWulf is moving further into the artificial intelligence infrastructure race, signing a long-term data center deal with AI firm Anthropic and restructuring its ownership in a separate AI campus venture. The company said it expects the agreement to generate about $19 billion in contract revenue over 20 years.

In a separate transaction, TeraWulf also announced plans to sell its majority stake in an AI data center joint venture in Texas, with proceeds intended for reinvestment into wholly owned AI infrastructure projects. Following the announcements, TeraWulf shares rose by roughly 12% in Monday morning trading, extending a year-to-date gain of about 107%, according to Yahoo Finance data at the time of writing.

Key takeaways

• TeraWulf signed a 20-year data center lease with Anthropic, expected to bring roughly $19 billion in contract revenue.
• The Anthropic campus will be built at TeraWulf’s Justified Data site in Hawesville, Kentucky, with initial operations targeted for the second half of 2027 and full buildout in early 2028.
• TeraWulf plans to monetize its 50.1% stake in the Abernathy AI data center joint venture in Texas and reinvest the returned capital into wholly owned projects.
• The broader shift reflects how AI demand for power, cooling, and high-performance compute is creating new opportunities—and new capital requirements—for Bitcoin miners.

Anthropic deal ties up TeraWulf’s Kentucky capacity

Under the new agreement, Anthropic will lease a purpose-built AI data center campus at TeraWulf’s Justified Data facility in Hawesville, Kentucky. The site, which TeraWulf acquired in February, is designed to support 401 MW of critical IT capacity.

TeraWulf’s announcement outlines a phased ramp-up: initial operations are expected in the second half of 2027, with the full buildout targeted for early 2028. For investors, the timeline matters as it defines when revenue streams associated with the expansion can begin translating into cash flow, rather than relying solely on the pace of construction progress.

While AI data centers rely on different hardware from crypto mining, the underlying infrastructure requirements overlap in important ways—especially around power access and the ability to operate energy-hungry computing at scale.

Reinvesting by selling the Abernathy stake

Alongside the Anthropic lease, TeraWulf disclosed it has agreed to sell its 50.1% stake in the Abernathy joint venture. The Abernathy project is positioned as an AI data center development in Texas.

The buyer is an investor group led by Fluidstack, acting through the joint venture arrangement. TeraWulf said it expects the sale to return roughly $450 million of its investment, which the company plans to reinvest into AI infrastructure projects it owns outright.

From a strategy perspective, this move suggests TeraWulf is attempting to balance partnerships with majority control: monetizing some exposure through the sale, while channeling capital toward projects where it can hold full ownership and capture a larger share of long-term economics. Still, readers may want to track how management defines “wholly owned projects,” including their construction stages and financing assumptions, because capital structure and timing can materially affect risk.

Why AI is reshaping Bitcoin mining’s infrastructure playbook

TeraWulf’s shift arrives at a moment when demand for AI infrastructure is outpacing available computing capacity. Training and running large AI models require data centers equipped with high-performance chips, advanced cooling systems, and reliable electricity—conditions that can make power-rich locations increasingly valuable.

Bitcoin miners have an advantage in that they often already operate or control grid-connected sites, power arrangements, and related infrastructure built for energy-intensive workloads. That has encouraged a wave of diversification into AI and high-performance computing (HPC), even though the end-use hardware differs from typical crypto mining setups.

But the pivot to AI is not frictionless. Blocksbridge Consulting, in a June estimate cited by the article, suggested public Bitcoin miners pursuing AI infrastructure may require roughly $50 billion in near-term capital. The implication is straightforward: AI buildouts can demand materially higher spending than traditional mining facilities, increasing the importance of securing long-term contracts, managing construction schedules, and maintaining access to financing.

Industry momentum and the funding gap narrative

The broader pattern shows up in other miner-adjacent deals. Earlier coverage noted that HIVE Digital signed a three-year, $220 million agreement to supply GPU cloud infrastructure for Cohere through Bell Canada’s AI Fabric. In another example of miners tying up new power for AI-era workloads, IREN acquired Spanish data center developer Nostrum Group, a move that added about 490 MW of secured, grid-connected power as it pushed into the European AI market.

Taken together, these moves underline the tension in the sector: the same power and data center capabilities that make miners attractive for AI also make them targets for substantial reinvestment. With AI infrastructure costs high and timelines long, contract-backed revenue—such as TeraWulf’s Anthropic lease—can become a key differentiator in proving that miners can scale beyond speculation and into durable customer demand.

For now, the most important things to watch are execution milestones—especially whether the Kentucky campus stays on track for initial operations in the second half of 2027—and how TeraWulf deploys the capital returned from selling the Abernathy stake into new, wholly owned projects. The market will likely focus on whether miners can close the funding gap highlighted by analysts while converting AI infrastructure plans into steady, contracted cash flows.

Bitmine Immersion Technologies’ stock has climbed more than 4% after the company expanded its Ethereum treasury with another 42,197 ETH, even as Strategy shares slipped following a Bitcoin sale.

According to Bitmine, the company purchased 42,197 ETH between June 29 and July 3, increasing its treasury to 5,742,237 ETH. The company said those holdings now account for about 4.8% of Ethereum’s circulating supply, reinforcing its position as one of the largest corporate holders of the cryptocurrency.

The latest acquisition also expanded Bitmine’s staking portfolio. The company disclosed that 4,879,157 ETH, roughly 85% of its treasury, is currently staked, generating an estimated annual staking yield of around $235 million.

Investors welcomed the update, sending Bitmine’s shares up 4.28% to $14.98 at the time of writing after the stock traded as high as $15.04 during the session. The gains came despite weakness elsewhere among crypto-linked equities.

By contrast, Strategy fell 1.17% after selling 3,588 BTC to repurchase its STRC preferred stock. The opposite moves in the two companies suggest investors favored Bitmine’s expanding Ethereum treasury strategy while reacting cautiously to Strategy’s latest capital allocation decision.

Bitmine’s Ethereum strategy continues to attract investor attention

Bitmine has steadily positioned itself as an Ethereum-focused treasury company rather than a traditional mining business. Alongside growing its ETH reserves, management has continued increasing the portion of those assets committed to staking to generate recurring on-chain income.

The latest purchase comes ahead of Bitmine’s earnings report covering the April through June 2026 quarter, scheduled for July 29. According to Wall Street estimates, the company is expected to report about $45 million in revenue.

Separately, Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee has maintained an optimistic outlook for U.S. equities. Speaking during CNBC’s Squawk Box, Lee said companies reporting third-quarter earnings later this month are likely to exceed Wall Street expectations, adding that such results could support another leg higher for stocks.

Lee also reiterated his expectation that the S&P 500 could climb from around 7,500 to 8,000 before the end of 2026.

Technical indicators point to improving momentum

BMNR has staged a strong rebound after breaking above its recent consolidation range near $14.30. The latest rally has pushed the stock to the doorstep of its 20-period simple moving average around $15.94, which now serves as the first major resistance level.

Advertisement

A sustained move above that average could open the way toward the 50-period moving average near $18.49. Even so, the stock remains below its 100- and 200-period moving averages, indicating that the longer-term trend has not yet turned bullish.

Momentum indicators have strengthened alongside the price recovery. The 4-hour MACD has completed a bullish crossover, while expanding green histogram bars indicate buying pressure has accelerated following the breakout.

Failure to hold above the recent breakout area near $15 could invite profit-taking and send the stock back toward support around $14.30, with the recent swing low near $13 remaining the next significant downside level if sellers regain control. 

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

MicroStrategy peer Strategy has continued its capital reshuffle, selling 3,588 Bitcoin for $216 million to support preferred stock dividend payments and replenish cash reserves, according to a Monday SEC filing. The move reduces the company’s total Bitcoin holdings to 843,775, as Strategy seeks to balance shareholder payouts with ongoing exposure to the asset class.

The transaction also adds a new datapoint to the debate over whether major Bitcoin buyers will eventually be forced to liquidate holdings. Earlier this year, Strategy disclosed its first reported Bitcoin sale since a 2022 tax-loss transaction—raising scrutiny about what, if anything, could trigger further sales.

Key takeaways

• Strategy sold 3,588 BTC for $216 million, cutting its holdings to 843,775, per an 8-K filed with the SEC.
• The sales were executed in two price windows: 1,363 BTC at an average $59,256 and 2,225 BTC at an average $60,773.
• Strategy says the purpose was to fund preferred stock dividends and restore cash reserves, keeping payout obligations covered.
• Analyst coverage from Bernstein previously argued the company was unlikely to be compelled to sell due to its liquidity position.

Strategy’s latest Bitcoin liquidation and what it funds

In its 8-K, Strategy states that it sold 3,588 Bitcoin for proceeds totaling $216 million. After the sale, the company reported remaining holdings of 843,775 BTC. The filing frames the sell-down as part of a broader effort to manage near-term corporate obligations while maintaining a large Bitcoin position.

Strategy also broke out portions of the sales by timing and average execution price. It sold 1,363 BTC at an average price of $59,256 between last Monday and Tuesday, then sold 2,225 BTC at an average price of $60,773 between Wednesday and Sunday. Those details matter for investors assessing whether the company is selling opportunistically across specific windows or responding to cash needs that require market timing.

Why the sale matters for investors watching “forced selling” risk

Bitcoin sales by large holders can move sentiment—even when they are not tied to distress. The key question for the market has been whether Strategy’s capital plan could eventually lead to compelled liquidation, or whether the company has enough liquidity to prevent that outcome.

That question has been addressed in prior research cited by the article, including a report from Bernstein. Bernstein argued that Strategy was unlikely to be forced to sell its holdings, pointing to the company’s liquidity position and cash reserves. The report also estimated that Strategy had 17 months of cash coverage for dividend obligations and interest payments and described Strategy as a “balancing force” in a market where other major Bitcoin-related players have been net sellers.

From an investor’s perspective, this framing reduces the immediacy of “death spiral” style fears—though the latest sale shows Strategy is willing to convert some Bitcoin exposure into cash when the corporate calendar requires it. What remains uncertain is whether future dividend cycles or funding needs would lead to additional sell-offs, or whether this was a contained adjustment.

From Strategy’s first sale to a broader read-through

Earlier coverage noted that Strategy disclosed the sale of 32 Bitcoin in early June, described as its first reported Bitcoin sale since a 2022 tax-loss transaction. The updated 8-K expands the story from a small exception into a far larger cash-generating action.

The market implication is not automatically bearish. Large holders can sell for operational reasons without changing their long-term thesis, especially when they hold substantial Bitcoin inventories and manage liquidity through a mix of cash and structured funding. Still, the direction and size of future transactions will likely influence how traders interpret Strategy’s role in the broader Bitcoin flow picture.

What to watch next

Going forward, investors should track whether Strategy repeats similar sell-downs in subsequent dividend periods and whether additional SEC disclosures clarify the cadence of its cash-management plan. The most important signal will be how Strategy’s reported liquidity coverage and dividend funding needs evolve relative to the timing and scale of future Bitcoin sales.

Richard Heathcote, the former chief investment officer of Tether, is reportedly looking to sell part of his stake in the stablecoin issuer, according to a Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter. Heathcote holds 1.26% of Tether, and the planned transaction would involve only a portion of that ownership.

Tether, which issues USDt (USDT), remains privately held despite operating as one of crypto’s most profitable businesses. The reported partial sale is notable not only because of Heathcote’s senior role, but also because it would be among the few glimpses into ownership at a company that underpins a large share of the stablecoin market.

Key takeaways

• Bloomberg reports that former Tether CIO Richard Heathcote plans to sell part of his 1.26% stake, offering rare insight into Tether ownership.
• USDT remains the dominant stablecoin by market capitalization, with DefiLlama data placing its circulating supply around $184 billion (about 59% market share).
• The potential sale comes as Tether faces increased regulatory pressure in Europe, including platform delistings after Tether did not align with the EU’s MiCA framework.
• Broader IPO chatter continues in crypto, even as exchanges weigh listing paths amid regulatory and operational constraints.

Why Heathcote’s stake sale matters

Bloomberg’s report focuses on the planned sale by Richard Heathcote, who stepped away from the role of Tether’s chief investment officer in March. The report says he moved into an advisory capacity after overseeing the company’s investment portfolio.

For markets, transactions involving insiders in key stablecoin issuers are often watched closely—even when only partial. Tether’s scale means its ownership structure and governance are relevant to traders and institutions that rely on USDT’s liquidity. While the report does not specify deal size beyond the portion of the stake, it underscores that influential executives at stablecoin issuers are not necessarily bound to long-term illiquidity, despite the asset’s centrality to crypto settlement and exchange activity.

Heathcote’s stake also highlights the challenge of assessing control and incentives in privately held crypto firms. With Tether not publicly listed, investors and observers have fewer direct market signals about internal changes. A reported sale, even a partial one, can become a data point for how senior stakeholders view holding periods, risk, and governance in a fast-changing regulatory environment.

USDT’s market position remains central

Any ownership move at Tether inevitably ties back to USDT’s dominance. According to DefiLlama data, USDT has a circulating supply of roughly $184 billion and accounts for approximately 59% of the stablecoin market by market capitalization.

This matters because USDT is not just a retail token—it is deeply embedded in the infrastructure of exchanges, trading pairs, and on-chain activity. When large portions of market liquidity are concentrated in a single issuer, stakeholders tend to pay particular attention to credible updates on that issuer’s financial posture, governance, and regulatory standing.

At the same time, the reported sale is not automatically a signal about USDT’s strength or weakness. Stablecoins can remain widely used even as regulatory constraints limit where they are permitted. The more meaningful question for investors is whether Tether’s regulatory path and distribution access continue to affect demand for USDT in key jurisdictions.

Regulatory pressure in Europe intersects with business uncertainty

The Heathcote sale report arrives as Tether faces heightened scrutiny in Europe. Earlier coverage from Cointelegraph noted that USDT has been delisted by an increasing number of platforms operating under MiCA authorizations after Tether chose not to comply with the EU’s crypto framework.

That tension has been visible in operator decisions. Cointelegraph previously reported that Revolut would remove USDT from its platform, reflecting how regulatory alignment—or lack of it—can translate into immediate distribution losses for a stablecoin issuer.

For market participants, this creates a split reality: USDT may remain dominant by market size, but issuer exposure to regulation can change the on-ramps and availability that sustain that market share in Europe. In that context, insider ownership moves may be read less as a market bet on USDT itself and more as an adjustment to the broader uncertainty around compliance, platform access, and long-term growth channels.

IPO speculation continues elsewhere in crypto

While Tether’s executives have publicly indicated the company does not need to go public, crypto’s IPO debate appears to be broadening beyond stablecoins. Several other firms have reportedly explored listing routes.

Cointelegraph previously highlighted that Kraken has taken steps that could lead toward an IPO. Fortune reported in September 2025 that Kraken raised $500 million at a $15 billion valuation, fueling expectations that the exchange was positioning for a public listing. Kraken also announced it had confidentially filed a draft registration statement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission in November 2025 for a proposed initial public offering.

However, Bloomberg later reported that Kraken’s IPO timeline could slip into 2027 after layoffs tied to the company’s increasing use of artificial intelligence. The implication for readers is that even when a path to liquidity exists, operational restructuring and market conditions can delay capital-market milestones.

In South Korea, Cointelegraph reported that Bithumb delayed its IPO until after 2028. The exchange said it was working to strengthen accounting policies and internal controls after earlier regulatory setbacks, underscoring how compliance process—not only investor demand—can shape public-market timing for crypto firms.

Separately, Cointelegraph has also published coverage focusing on anonymity-related risks and how AI may be used to identify hidden identities in crypto activity, reflecting the broader environment in which regulators, exchanges, and compliance teams are operating.

What to watch next

For Tether, the next signals likely won’t come from ownership headlines alone. Investors should track whether additional European platforms follow through on delistings under MiCA and how Tether responds operationally and commercially in regions tightening stablecoin rules. Meanwhile, Bloomberg’s reported stake sale may prompt renewed attention to how insiders manage liquidity in privately held firms as crypto firms weigh—or postpone—public listings.