Crypto World
‘Bitcoin to zero’ searches just hit a record. Could it happen?
Something revealing is happening on Google.
Summary
- U.S. searches for “Bitcoin to zero” reached a record as fear intensified during the market decline.
- Bitcoin reaching zero would require a fatal technical failure, total abandonment, or an effective worldwide ban.
- Its distributed ownership, mining infrastructure, ETFs, corporate holdings, and liquidity make complete abandonment highly improbable.
- Record fear searches are a sentiment signal and have historically appeared closer to bottoms than market tops.
Searches for the phrase “Bitcoin to zero” have surged to the highest level ever recorded in the United States, hitting a peak score of 100 on Google Trends, stronger than the panic spikes of the 2022 collapse and the 2025 drawdowns.
The query is a window into the crypto market’s collective psychology in mid-2026: with Bitcoin down sharply from its highs, the Fear and Greed Index buried in extreme fear, and the longest Bitcoin ETF outflow streak on record, a growing number of people are typing the most existential question a holder can ask into a search bar.
Could Bitcoin actually go to zero?
It is a fair question, and it deserves a serious answer instead of either reflexive dismissal or doom-mongering.
The honest response requires separating what would truly have to happen for Bitcoin to reach zero from the panic that drives people to search for it, and understanding why the record-breaking fear in the search data is, historically, more likely a contrarian signal than a prophecy.
This piece takes the question seriously, walks through the actual scenarios that could send Bitcoin to zero and why each is improbable, and explains what the search surge really tells us.
What the search data is actually showing
Start with the signal itself, because the “Bitcoin to zero” search spike is remarkable and worth understanding before judging what it means.
According to Google Trends data, U.S. searches for “Bitcoin to zero” climbed to a peak score of 100, the maximum on Google’s relative scale, marking the highest level on record.
This is not a modest uptick.
The phrase has spiked during previous market drawdowns, including the 2022 bear market and briefly in 2025, but the current surge is stronger than those previous peaks.
That means more people are searching for Bitcoin’s potential demise now than at any point in its history, including during the FTX collapse.
For most of 2023 and early 2024, interest in the phrase remained muted, reflecting calmer markets.
The sudden record-breaking rise reflects acute retail anxiety as Bitcoin consolidates after a sharp decline.
The context explains the fear.
Bitcoin has fallen substantially from its cycle high, the Fear and Greed Index has registered readings deep in extreme fear, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs bled through a record 13-day outflow streak draining billions, and the broader market shed hundreds of billions in a matter of days.
For a retail investor watching their portfolio collapse amid a relentlessly negative news cycle, “Is this going to zero?” is the natural question, and the search data captures millions of people asking it simultaneously.
The spike is a direct readout of peak retail fear, the moment when the emotional bottom feels closest.
Here is the first and most important thing to understand about that signal: peak-fear searches have historically clustered near market bottoms, not before further collapses.
The same behavioral pattern that drives the Fear and Greed Index applies to search behavior.
People search “Bitcoin to zero” when they are most afraid, and they are most afraid after prices have already fallen hard, which is precisely when much of the selling has already occurred.
The record-breaking nature of the current search spike, stronger than 2022 or 2025, is therefore as easily read as a sign of capitulation-level fear as a warning of imminent doom.
The intensity of the “Bitcoin to zero” searches is, paradoxically, one of the better contrarian arguments that Bitcoin is not going to zero.
But to make that case properly, the scenarios must be examined.
What would have to happen for Bitcoin to reach zero
To answer the question seriously, it is necessary to ask what “Bitcoin to zero” would actually require, because zero is a specific and extreme outcome, not just a big further decline.
For Bitcoin to reach zero, it would need to become genuinely worthless, held by no one, used by no one, and valued by no one.
Walking through the scenarios that could produce that outcome reveals how high the bar is.
The first scenario is a fatal technical failure.
Bitcoin could, in theory, go to zero if its underlying technology catastrophically and irreparably broke: a flaw that allowed the supply to be counterfeited at will, a break in its cryptography, or a failure of its consensus mechanism so severe that the ledger could no longer be trusted.
This is the scenario that the Zcash Orchard bug recently made vivid for a privacy coin.
But for Bitcoin specifically, it is extraordinarily unlikely.
Bitcoin’s core cryptography and consensus have operated without a successful protocol-level breach for more than 15 years, securing trillions of dollars in value through relentless adversarial testing.
The cryptography securing it—SHA-256 hashing and elliptic-curve signatures—is the same battle-tested cryptography underpinning much of the global financial and security infrastructure.
Even the quantum-computing threat, the most discussed long-term technical risk, is years away and is being actively addressed through proposals like BIP-360.
A sudden fatal technical break is the clearest path to zero and also among the least probable.
The second scenario is total network abandonment.
Bitcoin could go to zero if everyone simply stopped using it—if miners stopped securing it, developers stopped maintaining it, exchanges stopped listing it, and holders stopped holding it—all at once.
But this contradicts everything observable about Bitcoin’s current state.
The network is secured by an enormous, globally distributed mining industry with billions of dollars invested in hardware and energy infrastructure.
It is held by tens of millions of individuals, public companies with Bitcoin on their balance sheets, spot ETFs holding tens of billions in assets, institutions, and governments exploring strategic reserves.
For Bitcoin to reach zero through abandonment, all these committed, heavily invested participants would have to abandon it simultaneously.
That is not how a deeply entrenched, widely held asset behaves.
The infrastructure and ownership are far too distributed and committed for coordinated total abandonment.
The third scenario is a global regulatory ban so complete that it extinguishes all use.
A coordinated worldwide prohibition, with every major government banning ownership, trading, and mining simultaneously and enforcing it effectively, could theoretically strangle Bitcoin.
But this scenario has only grown less plausible over time, not more.
The trend in 2026 is the opposite of a global ban: the United States is exploring a strategic Bitcoin reserve, spot ETFs have been approved across major markets, regulatory frameworks such as the CLARITY Act are advancing to legitimize rather than prohibit crypto, and Bitcoin is being woven into mainstream finance through mortgage recognition and institutional products.
A coordinated global ban would require the world’s governments, many of which now hold Bitcoin through seizures or are developing favorable regulatory systems, to reverse course in perfect unison.
That is geopolitically implausible.
Even authoritarian bans have historically pushed Bitcoin activity underground rather than extinguishing it.
Why each path to zero is improbable
Having laid out the scenarios, it is worth being explicit about why, in combination, they make zero a genuine tail risk rather than a realistic forecast.
The reasoning matters more than the conclusion.
The deepest reason is that Bitcoin has crossed a threshold of entrenchment that makes total worthlessness extraordinarily difficult to achieve.
An asset goes to zero when it has no holders, users, infrastructure, or believers—the state of a failed startup token or collapsed scheme.
Bitcoin is the opposite.
It has the deepest liquidity in crypto, distributed ownership, the largest and most committed mining base, regulated financial products built on top of it, corporate and potentially sovereign treasuries holding it, and a track record spanning more than 15 years.
Each of these is a structural anchor against zero, and they reinforce one another.
The ETFs need the asset to exist. Miners are financially committed to securing it. Corporate holders have staked their balance sheets on it. Governments holding seized coins have an interest in its value.
Zero would require all these anchors to fail together.
They are held by different parties with different incentives in different jurisdictions, making coordinated total failure close to impossible.
The historical record reinforces the point.
Bitcoin has been declared dead hundreds of times throughout its history and has survived the 2018 bear market that took it down roughly 84%, the 2022 collapse that took it down 77% amid the Terra and FTX failures, and numerous smaller crashes.
Each decline generated its own “Bitcoin to zero” fears.
In every case, the asset recovered and later reached new highs, not because recovery is guaranteed, but because the structural anchors held and capitulation eventually exhausted itself.
The current drawdown, severe as it feels, is so far shallower than the 2018 and 2022 declines that preceded recoveries.
A holder searching “Bitcoin to zero” today is doing what holders did at every previous bottom, and at every previous bottom the asset did not go to zero.
None of this means zero is impossible, and intellectual honesty requires acknowledging that.
An authentically catastrophic, unprecedented technical break or an unforeseeable coordinated global collapse cannot be ruled out with absolute certainty.
Anyone claiming Bitcoin can never, under any circumstances, go to zero is overstating the case.
But “cannot be ruled out with absolute certainty” is a very different claim from “is a realistic outcome to plan around.”
Zero is a genuine tail risk—the kind of low-probability, high-impact scenario that belongs in a serious risk assessment—not the base case the record-breaking search spike might suggest.
The honest framing is that Bitcoin going to zero is improbable to the point that it should inform position sizing and risk management more than panic selling.
That is the opposite of what the search surge suggests people are doing.
What actually does go to zero
A useful way to calibrate the Bitcoin-to-zero question is to examine the kinds of crypto assets that have actually gone to zero.
Plenty have, and the contrast with Bitcoin is instructive.
Crypto is littered with assets that went to zero or close to it, and they share characteristics Bitcoin conspicuously lacks.
Failed algorithmic stablecoins such as TerraUSD collapsed to near-zero when their mechanism broke because their value depended entirely on a confidence loop that, once shattered, had nothing underneath it.
Thousands of ICO tokens from the 2017 boom went effectively to zero when their projects failed to deliver because they were claims on promises that never materialized, with no users, revenue, or staying power.
Exchange tokens such as FTX’s FTT collapsed when the exchange behind them failed because their value was tied to a single company that turned out to be fraudulent.
Countless meme coins have gone to zero after their fleeting attention faded because attention was the only thing supporting them.
The common thread among assets that actually went to zero is that each depended on a single point of failure: a mechanism, company, promise, or wave of attention that, once removed, left nothing behind.
TerraUSD depended on its algorithm. FTT depended on FTX. ICO tokens depended on teams delivering. Meme coins depended on hype.
When the single supporting pillar collapsed, the asset had no other foundation.
It went to zero because there was nothing else holding it up.
This is what going to zero actually looks like: the removal of the one thing an asset depended on.
Bitcoin is structurally the opposite, which is why the contrast matters.
It does not depend on a single mechanism that can break, one company that can fail, one team that can fail to deliver, or one wave of attention that can fade.
It is supported by a distributed mining industry, ownership across tens of millions of holders, regulated financial products, corporate and potentially sovereign treasuries, a track record spanning more than 15 years, and the deepest liquidity in crypto.
Each is an independent pillar held by different parties with different incentives.
For Bitcoin to go to zero, all these independent pillars would have to fail together, whereas the assets that actually went to zero each had only one pillar to lose.
The things that go to zero are single-point-of-failure assets.
Bitcoin is the most multiply redundant asset in crypto, which is precisely why the historical examples of crypto going to zero do not map onto it.
Understanding what does go to zero clarifies why Bitcoin almost certainly will not.
What the search surge really tells us
Step back from the scenarios, and the more useful question is what the record “Bitcoin to zero” search spike actually signals about the market.
The answer points in a more constructive direction than the query implies.
The search surge is, first and foremost, a sentiment indicator, and an extreme one.
It belongs in the same family as the Fear and Greed Index reading deep in extreme fear: a measure of how frightened the market is, not a measure of what is actually likely to happen.
The fact that “Bitcoin to zero” searches hit a record, stronger than in 2022 or 2025, shows that retail fear has reached an extreme rarely seen.
That is information about psychology, not Bitcoin’s fundamental prospects.
As with all extreme sentiment readings, the contrarian interpretation has historical weight.
Peak fear has tended to cluster near bottoms because, by the time the maximum number of people are searching whether their investment is going to zero, the maximum amount of capitulation selling has typically already happened.
The behavioral pattern is consistent and worth internalizing.
Search interest in Bitcoin, including fearful queries, spikes during sharp price declines, not during calm uptrends.
That means these searches are a lagging reaction to price rather than a leading predictor of it.
People do not search “Bitcoin to zero” when Bitcoin is at all-time highs.
They search it after it has already fallen hard, which is structurally close to the point of maximum pessimism.
This is why analysts read surging search interest during a sell-off as a potential sign that retail is re-engaging and capitulation may be peaking, in the same way they read extreme-fear measurements.
The record search spike is the crowd at its most afraid, and the crowd at its most afraid has historically been wrong about the direction more often than right.
There is a second, subtler signal in the surge: it indicates retail attention is returning to Bitcoin after a period of disengagement.
For much of the period when institutions and ETFs dominated the market, retail search interest faded.
The resurgence of searches, even fearful ones, suggests everyday investors are paying attention again.
Whether that attention converts into buying or selling is uncertain, but renewed retail engagement is itself a precondition for the broad participation that has historically accompanied recoveries.
The honest synthesis is that the record “Bitcoin to zero” search spike is best understood not as evidence that Bitcoin is going to zero, which the scenarios show is improbable, but as evidence that fear has reached an extreme and retail attention has returned.
That combination has historically appeared near bottoms instead of before further collapses.
The people searching the question are, in aggregate and historically, asking it close to the worst possible moment to act on the fear behind it.
How to actually think about the question
For anyone worried enough to search “Bitcoin to zero,” the constructive path is to translate fear into disciplined thinking rather than letting it drive action.
A few principles help.
The first is to right-size the risk.
Bitcoin going to zero is a real tail risk, which means it should inform how much of a portfolio is placed into Bitcoin in the first place, not whether someone panic-sells after a decline.
A risk that cannot be ruled out with certainty is a reason for prudent position sizing and holding an amount that could be lost entirely.
It is not automatically a reason to capitulate at the bottom of a drawdown.
If the possibility of zero is frightening, the lesson is about allocation discipline before the fact, not panic after it.
Selling into extreme fear because of a sudden awareness of a tail risk that existed all along is reacting to emotion, not new information.
The second principle is to recognize that the question itself is a contrarian signal.
Anyone searching “Bitcoin to zero” is, by definition, experiencing the emotional state that has historically marked bottoms rather than tops.
That does not guarantee a bottom is in.
But it should prompt reflection that the urge to sell is strongest at exactly the moments that have historically rewarded buying or holding.
The discipline is to notice that the fear is shared by a record number of people, that record-shared fear has preceded recoveries before, and that acting on it places the investor alongside the crowd that has historically been wrong at the extremes.
The clearest answer to the bottom-feared question is that Bitcoin going to zero is improbable to the point of being a tail risk rather than a forecast.
The asset has crossed a threshold of entrenchment, distributed ownership, institutional integration, and proven resilience that makes total worthlessness extraordinarily difficult to achieve.
The scenarios that could cause it—fatal technical failure, total abandonment, or a coordinated global ban—are each individually unlikely and collectively close to implausible.
The record-breaking search spike is not a prophecy of that outcome but a thermometer of extreme fear, and extreme fear has historically clustered near bottoms.
None of this is a promise that Bitcoin will recover, cannot fall further, or that zero is literally impossible.
Each of those claims would overstate the case.
The more measured truth is that the question millions are now searching reflects a moment of maximum fear, that the answer to the literal question is “almost certainly not,” and that the people asking it are, historically, asking close to the wrong time to act on that fear.
The search data is real. The fear is real.
The most likely meaning of both is not that Bitcoin is dying, but that the market is frightened, which is a very different and far more survivable condition.
This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. The figures and analysis described reflect data available as of June 2026. Always do your own research and consult with qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions.
Crypto World
SpaceX IPO Turns Tesla Merger Talk Into a Core Wall Street Thesis
Wolfe Research says a SpaceX and Tesla merger has moved into the Wall Street mainstream. Some investors now treat a future combination as their primary reason for owning TSLA stock.
Analyst Emmanuel Rosner detailed the thesis in a June 9 client note. The call lands two days before Elon Musk’s rocket firm prices the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history.
Why the SpaceX Tesla Merger Thesis Is Gaining Ground
SpaceX plans to sell 555.6 million shares at a fixed $135 apiece, according to StreetInsider. The deal would raise a record $75 billion at a $1.75 trillion valuation.
Nasdaq trading starts June 12 under the ticker SPCX.
The offering is all-primary, and Musk must hold his shares for 366 days after the debut. Demand already outstrips supply.
The offering is well oversubscribed, with some institutions bidding for $10 billion or more. Banks will close order books Wednesday, with reported demand near $150 billion.
Rosner identifies three forces behind the merger thesis:
- A public SpaceX hands Musk liquid stock currency.
- A hypothetical all-stock deal would push Musk’s voting control well above 50%.
- A combined company would pair Tesla’s driving data with SpaceX’s compute buildout and a larger capital base.
SpaceX already absorbed Musk’s AI startup xAI earlier this year, a deal valuing the rocket maker at $1 trillion.
“The potential for an eventual SpaceX / Tesla merger has increasingly moved into the mainstream, with some now making it their primary thesis for owning the TSLA stock,” Rosner wrote in the firm’s latest note, citing discussions with institutional investors.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Bitcoin Sits Inside the Record Listing
The IPO carries direct crypto weight too. SpaceX’s S-1 filing disclosed 18,712 Bitcoin (BTC) bought for roughly $661 million in 2021, near $35,324 per coin.
The filing valued the position at $1.29 billion as of March 31. That tops the roughly 11,509 BTC held by Tesla in the corporate bitcoin treasury rankings.
Crypto traders are pricing the debut early. Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken list SPCX pre-IPO perpetual futures, as crypto markets price SpaceX before its shares list.
ProShares plans to launch a 2x daily leveraged SpaceX ETF on listing day itself.
Hurdles Push Any Deal Beyond Mid-2027
Wolfe flags serious obstacles, however.
- Tesla would likely pay a large premium, and other SpaceX shareholders could object.
Tesla’s China operations add regulatory complications. The firm sees completion as unlikely before mid-2027 at the earliest.
- Valuation adds another caution.
SpaceX booked $18.67 billion in revenue in 2025 but posted a $4.94 billion net loss.
Morningstar pegged fair value at $780 billion, and some analysts argue the float is worth half the valuation.
Near term, Rosner argues merger anticipation may give Tesla shares downside support.
However, he stresses that robotaxi and Optimus delivery still decides whether the stock finds momentum.
The offering prices on June 11. Early SPCX trading may show whether investors assign a real merger premium or treat the idea as narrative fuel.
Either answer will shape expectations for what comes after SpaceX goes public.
Read Also:
- Fidelity Cuts SpaceX IPO Eligibility by 99%, But 5 Rules Could Cost You Access
- 6 Questions Investors Must Ask as Elon Musk Locks 100% SpaceX Shares Before IPO
- 3 Massive Things That Could Happen After SpaceX Goes Public in June 2026
- 5 Ways Crypto Markets Are Pricing SpaceX Before Wall Street Can
- 10 Surprising Facts About Elon Musk’s $1 Trillion SpaceX IPO
The post SpaceX IPO Turns Tesla Merger Talk Into a Core Wall Street Thesis appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Lubin-Labeled Wallet Adds 110,000 ETH to Sky Vaults Backing $259M DAI Debt

A genesis-block Ethereum wallet labeled "Joseph Lubin?" by Arkham Intelligence deposited 110,000 ETH into three Sky Finance vaults on Friday, shoring up the collateral behind $259.05 million in outstanding DAI debt as ETH prices fell sharply, per Lookonchain. The transfers arrived in four… Read the full story at The Defiant
Crypto World
Market Snapshot: Tech Sector Retreat Drives Nasdaq Down 3% Amid Profit-Taking
TLDR
- The Nasdaq experienced a sharp 3% decline driven by widespread selling in AI and chip stocks
- Intel shares retreated over 4% following a recent surge linked to potential Alphabet partnership
- Brent crude plummeted more than 4%, approaching the $90 threshold
- Market speculation intensifies around a potential OpenAI public listing
- Nuvalent shares soared on M&A speculation in the biotech sector
The Nasdaq experienced a sharp downturn, tumbling approximately 3% during one of its most challenging trading sessions in weeks. The selloff primarily targeted semiconductor manufacturers, artificial intelligence infrastructure providers, and high-growth technology names that had previously dominated market gains throughout the year.

The downturn arrived following an extended period of gains in artificial intelligence-related equities that drove valuations to elevated levels. Many market participants opted to realize gains instead of maintaining exposure amid growing uncertainty.
Broader market indices experienced significant pressure as well. The concentration of capital in a limited number of technology giants created vulnerability across major benchmarks when investor sentiment reversed course.
Intel Reverses Course Following Alphabet Manufacturing Speculation
Intel shares declined more than 4% after experiencing a recent uptick based on speculation that Alphabet might utilize its foundry operations for producing next-generation AI processors. Market participants had interpreted this development as a potentially significant milestone for Intel’s efforts to restore its manufacturing competitiveness.
The reversal demonstrates the volatility inherent in technology equities when overall market sentiment deteriorates. Market observers continue monitoring whether Intel can secure major client relationships and narrow the competitive divide with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.
Crude Oil Tumbles Toward $90 Benchmark
Brent crude experienced a decline exceeding 4%, drifting toward the $90 per barrel level. The downturn materialized as anxieties surrounding Middle Eastern supply interruptions diminished.
The retreat in oil prices provided a boost to airline equities, given that fuel expenses represent their largest operational cost. Conversely, energy sector companies encountered selling pressure as earnings forecasts were adjusted downward.
The shift also refocused attention on inflation dynamics. Reduced energy costs could potentially alleviate some inflationary pressures that have challenged markets throughout the current year.
OpenAI Public Offering Speculation Intensifies
OpenAI continues operating as a privately held entity, yet speculation surrounding a potential public market debut attracted increasing attention. The organization responsible for ChatGPT has emerged as one of the artificial intelligence sector’s most prominent players.
A potential public offering would likely represent one of the most highly anticipated technology market debuts in recent memory. Investors continue analyzing what implications a publicly traded OpenAI might hold for valuations throughout the artificial intelligence ecosystem.
Nuvalent Rallies on Buyout Speculation
Biotechnology company Nuvalent emerged as one of the session’s standout performers. Shares jumped sharply following acquisition-related developments that captured investor attention and fueled speculation regarding merger activity within the biotechnology sector.
The surge highlighted a broader pattern of investors exploring opportunities beyond saturated technology positions. Healthcare and biotechnology equities have underperformed relative to the AI-driven market rally, positioning them as compelling alternatives for investors pursuing fresh opportunities.
The Nuvalent advance underscored that merger and acquisition activity continues serving as a critical catalyst for returns in healthcare, particularly for smaller-cap companies possessing robust product development pipelines.
Crypto World
Kalshi perpetual futures trading ‘perps’ crosses $1 billion in volume within a week of launch
Kalshi’s logo appears on a smartphone placed on a reflective surface, with a blurry betting curve projected in the background in Creteil, France, on March 9, 2026, during a major scandal and $54 million lawsuit concerning bets related to recent strikes in Iran.
Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images
Prediction market platform Kalshi’s perpetual futures have already crossed $1 billion in trading volume within a week of their launch last week, the company shared exclusively with CNBC.
The company officially launched trading on crypto perpetual futures, or “perps,” on Wednesday, and in the first 24 hours saw more than $100 million in volume.
Perps are futures contracts with no expiration date that allow traders to speculate on a price without owning the underlying asset. Contracts track the price of an asset continuously, with funding payments keeping the perpetual contract price aligned with the market.
The asset class has over $90 trillion in annual global volume, according to Bank of America, but before Kalshi there wasn’t a way to trade the contracts in the U.S.
(Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour will make an appearance on CNBC’s “Fast Money” on Tuesday at 5 p.m. ET.)
Kalshi received regulatory approval from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission on May 29 to be the first company in the U.S. to offer perp contracts. Coinbase on the same day also received approval from regulators to offer its U.S. traders access to global perp contracts through an affiliate.
Pent up domestic demand has been reflected on Kalshi since the launch. A spokesperson said that at one point the waitlist to access perps on the platform had more than 1 million people on it, and that it’s the fastest growing product in the company’s history. It took Kalshi 40 months to see $1 billion in trading volumes across its event contracts.
Perpetuals marked the company’s biggest product launch since it first launched its prediction markets.
Disclosure: CNBC and Kalshi have a commercial relationship that includes customer acquisition and a minority investment.
Crypto World
Stellar faces renewed selling pressure amid bearish derivatives data
Key takeaways
- Stellar (XLM) remains under pressure despite a modest rebound following last week’s sharp correction.
- Derivatives data shows a bearish bias, with long-to-short ratios below 1 and funding rates turning negative for the asset.
Stellar (XLM) remained under pressure on Tuesday despite staging a modest recovery following last week’s steep market-wide correction.
Weak derivatives positioning and mixed on-chain signals suggest that recent gains may be corrective rather than the start of a sustained bullish reversal.
Market data indicates traders continue to favor downside exposure, reinforcing a cautious outlook for both assets.
Derivatives markets signal growing bearish sentiment
Recent derivatives data from CoinGlass points to increasing pessimism among traders. The long-to-short ratio for XLM fell to 0.73 on Tuesday, approaching its lowest readings in more than a month.
A ratio below 1 indicates that short positions outweigh long positions, highlighting expectations for further price declines.
The bearish bias is further reflected in funding rates. XLM’s funding rate turned negative on Monday and continued trending lower into Tuesday.
Negative funding rates indicate that short sellers are paying long-position holders, a sign that traders are increasingly positioning for downside movement.
CryptoQuant’s market summary data presents a mixed but slightly negative outlook for XLM. Data shows elevated activity across both spot and futures markets, with increased retail participation and buy-side dominance.
While rising buying activity may seem positive, overheated market conditions often precede short-term pullbacks, limiting the potential for a sustained recovery.
Stellar price forecast: Momentum begins to fade
Stellar is trading near $0.195 on Tuesday, holding above its 50-day and 100-day EMAs at $0.182 and $0.179, respectively.
While this positioning supports a neutral-to-slightly bullish short-term outlook, XLM continues to face resistance at the 200-day EMA near $0.198.
Technical indicators suggest momentum is cooling. The RSI sits near 45, indicating balanced market conditions. The MACD has slipped below the zero line, signaling weakening bullish momentum and raising the risk of another downside move if buyers fail to regain control.
If the rally resumes, immediate resistance lies at the 200-day EMA at $0.198, with the next upside target at $0.226
However, if the sellers stay in control, initial support is seen at $0.185, with the next level at the 50-day EMA at $0.182.
A daily candle close below these levels would expose lower support zones at $1.79 and $1.43.
Crypto World
Ethereum Price Halts Near $1,700 as BitMine Fires Huge ETH Buy At Bears
Ethereum News: ETH Price is trading at $1,691, clawing back from a June low near $1,505 but still pinned below the resistance zone that has capped every rally since April.
BitMine Immersion Technologies just executed its largest weekly Ethereum accumulation of 2026, 126,971 ETH added during the dip, yet the MACD remains deeply negative, and the Aroon Oscillator screams seller control.
Two forces are directly opposed. One of them will break.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Ethereum News: BitMine’s $9 Billion Bet: Largest Weekly ETH Buy of 2026
BitMine Immersion Technologies purchased 126,971 ETH during last week’s weakness, its single largest weekly Ethereum accumulation of 2026.
That buy lifted its total corporate treasury holdings to 5,543,872 ETH, equal to approximately 4.59% of Ethereum’s estimated circulating supply.
The position is valued at ~$9.04 billion using a reference price of $1,630. Of that total, 4,718,677 ETH is actively staked.
BitMine Chairman Tom Lee reported annualized staking revenue now projected at $230 million, a yield-generating angle that separates this corporate treasury strategy from pure spot accumulation plays like Strategy’s Bitcoin model.
The scale of the Ethereum accumulation positions BitMine as a structural whale in the market. Buying 126,971 ETH at a declining price is a deliberate averaging-down strategy, one that signals conviction in the longer-term value even as near-term charts argue against it.
Analyst Ali Martinez offered supporting evidence from on-chain data, noting that ETH trading below the 0.8 market-value-to-realized-value band has historically flagged accumulation zones and that a TD Sequential buy signal flags potential seller exhaustion.

That said, corporate treasury demand has not reversed structurally bearish setups before in this cycle. BitMine bought aggressively during the earlier 2026 corrections, too, and sellers reasserted control each time.
$1,500 or $2,000: The Levels That Decide the Next Move
ETH holds $1,650 support, closes convincingly above $1,715 on sustained volume, and ETF inflows follow through after the June 8 reversal day. That sequence opens the path to $1,875 first, then the $1,900 to $2,000 resistance cluster. A clean break above $2,000 begins to repair market structure and brings the weekly 200 MA at $2,471 into view as a longer-term target.
If conflicting signals persist, corporate accumulation absorbing ETF outflow sell pressure without a decisive move in either direction, ETH consolidates between $1,500 and $1,700. US CPI data becomes the macro catalyst that determines whether the range breaks up or down.
Failure to hold $1,650 sends sellers back to the June low at $1,505. A weekly close below $1,500 triggers the scenario Ash Crypto outlined. Below that level there is no established support shelf until $1,000 to $1,100. Volume data from the recent sell-off suggests that the breakdown would not be gentle.
The weight of evidence currently favors the base case, trending toward bearish resolution. MACD negative. Aroon deeply in seller territory. ETF outflows were dominant through most of June. On-chain profitability at multi-year lows. BitMine’s Ethereum accumulation provides a real demand floor, but it has not been enough to flip the technical picture yet.
BitMine holds 4.59% of Ethereum’s supply and stakes nearly all of it, generating $230 million in projected annual revenue. That conviction is either the smartest institutional trade of the cycle or a painful averaging-down exercise. The answer depends entirely on whether $1,500 holds.
Watch the weekly close. That is the only level that matters right now.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post Ethereum Price Halts Near $1,700 as BitMine Fires Huge ETH Buy At Bears appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Nobody Wants To Admit Google Gemini AI Might Be Right About XRP Price Prediction
Google Gemini AI just put XRP on the map again with a price prediction target of $5.00 to $7.00 by the end of 2026. With XRP changing hands near $1.16 right now, that is a 4x to 6x call on a coin most holders had written off.
The bull case hangs on two big pillars, institutional adoption and the death of regulatory ambiguity in the U.S. If Ripple pulls off a clean RLUSD stablecoin integration, expands its cross-border liquidity network with major global banks, and rides a pro-crypto policy pivot that cracks open the door for a spot XRP ETF, demand could go vertical.

That kind of real utility flowing into the token is what drives the push toward $5.00 to $7.00. It is a story built on XRP finally being used at scale, not just traded.
The bear case is a softer landing, not a wipeout. If prolonged macro headwinds drag on, institutional cross-border volume stalls out, or a market wide liquidity drain hits, XRP could slide back toward the $0.65 to $0.80 support level.
That is the zone where the thesis cools off and patience gets tested. Still, even that downside is shallow compared to the size of the upside if the utility story plays out the way the bulls expect.
XRP Price Prediction: When Utility Finally Outruns The Charts
XRP price is on the daily and price sits at $1.16 after a long bleed from the $3.65 top set last July.
The structure is a textbook downtrend, a steady run of lower highs and lower lows that just carved a fresh local low near $1.04.
Pattern wise this is a descending channel, and price is now trying to put in a small bounce off that low.
Key support sits right here at $1.10, with the next shelf near $1.00 and major demand back at $0.80. Resistance stacks at $1.40, then $1.60, and the heavier zone at $1.80.
RSI is reading 33.35 with its signal line at 32.05. So momentum is sitting just above its average and crawling up out of oversold.
That tight gap of about 1.3 points with RSI back over the signal is an early sign the selling is drying up. A clean push above the 40 zone would confirm buyers are stepping back in.
Tie it together and the chart is beaten down hard, exactly the kind of base the prediction wants before any 4x dream. Reclaim $1.40 and the road toward $5.00 starts to look a little less wild.
Here is Why Gemini AI Prediction For LiquidChain is Bullish
Cycles do not reward patience at resistance. They reward positioning before the move.
Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP are all testing the same bands they have been stuck under for weeks. The macro catalyst is always one data print away. The institutional inflows are always one quarter away. The ceiling is visible, it is not moving, and everyone sitting in large caps waiting for a breakout is waiting on a decision that belongs to someone else.
Early stage infrastructure operates in a different reality entirely. Capital that would not move Bitcoin’s price by a single percentage point can reprice a small cap project dramatically. The opportunity exists in the gap between what something is genuinely worth and what the market has assigned it so far. That gap is only available while the project remains undiscovered. Discovery closes it permanently.
Multi-chain fragmentation has been extracting value from DeFi users since the first bridge launched and nothing has fixed it. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana were built as separate systems with no shared architecture and no native interoperability. Every transaction that crosses those boundaries pays for that design decision in fees, slippage, and execution failures. Bridges did not solve the problem. They monetized it.
LiquidChain removes the problem entirely. All 3 networks collapse into a single execution layer where developers deploy once and users interact across every ecosystem without absorbing a cross-chain tax on every move.
ChatGPT AI has flagged it as a project worth watching. The presale is at $0.01454 with just over $820,000 raised.
Execution risk is real. Adoption is unproven. Established assets offer a smoother ride toward a ceiling that is already fully priced. LiquidChain is a seat at a table that has not been set yet.
Explore the LiquidChain Presale
The post Nobody Wants To Admit Google Gemini AI Might Be Right About XRP Price Prediction appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Bitcoin slips toward $62K as bear-market history echoes past cycles
Bitcoin (BTC) slipped to week-to-date lows as markets opened on Tuesday, with traders eyeing the $65,000 region as the threshold bulls must clear to regain momentum. The early session underscored a cautious mood ahead of the key US inflation print, as BTC hovered near notable support levels.
Data from TradingView showed BTC down about 1.2% on the day, after a double rejection near $64,200 set the stage for another test of the $60,000 area. The persistent struggle at the $65,000 mark has kept bulls on the back foot even as the broader market awaits new cues.
Key takeaways
- 65k hurdle remains critical for bulls: A break above $65,000 could trigger a renewed rally toward the $72,000–$74,000 zone, according to well-known market analyst Michaël van de Poppe.
- Bear-market patterns resurface: Analysts note BTC has already fallen through or near several classic bear-market markers, including the 50-month exponential moving average and a triangle support pattern, echoing characteristics seen in 2018 and 2022.
- Macro backdrop softens near-term mood: Oil markets moved lower as Iran peace momentum reemerged, while US indices traded higher in early action, underscoring a mixed macro backdrop for risk assets including crypto.
- Last week’s macro low remains a reference point: Traders highlight the bound near $59,100 as part of the ongoing debate about how much further downside is possible in the current cycle.
- Oil volatility and crypto correlations: WTI crude slipped below $88 per barrel, marking a June-like low, while equities opened with gains, illustrating the complex, sometimes divergent, macro forces shaping crypto sentiment.
BTC price action: bear-market echoes and key levels
Bitcoin’s Tuesday session unfolded with selling pressure building ahead of a fresh read on inflation data in the United States. A 1.2% drop on the day left BTC testing the lower boundary of the recent range, with a notable rejection at about $64,200 raising the risk of a test of the critical $60,000 support floor.
Analysts have been weighing the implications of the current price action against historical bear-market pathways. Michaël van de Poppe, a trader and analyst known for his market theses, emphasized that breaking the $65,000 barrier is essential for shifting the momentum back in favor of the bulls. “Bitcoin is stalling beneath $65K; breaking that level would trigger a strong run to $72K–$74K,” he explained, underscoring the level’s role as a resistance pivot after a February decline.
“The $65K support level was the previous level of support after the crash early in February and is now acting as the resistance to break through.”
Another influential voice in the space, Rekt Capital, drew comparisons between the present pattern and past cycle bottoms. He pointed to two hallmarks—loss of the 50-month EMA and a breach of a triangle support—that occurred in 2018 and 2022. “Now Bitcoin needs to fully confirm this breakdown to enter additional Bearish Acceleration to the downside,” he remarked in a recent update. The broader takeaway is that the market is watching for a decisive move beyond a few pivotal levels before signaling a durable trend reversal.
Those watching the macro landscape note that last week’s dip to around $59,100 remains a point of reference. While some participants view the recent selloff as irrational by some measures, the current setup suggests that traders will seek a clear breakout—above $65,000 or below the lower bounds of the nearby range—to confirm the next phase of the cycle.
Macro backdrop: oil moves, Iran peace momentum and market timing
In contrast to the crypto market’s tug-of-war, traditional markets opened with a cautious tilt, as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq rose by roughly 1% in early trading. The broader mood was tempered by ongoing macro narratives, including calls for peace in broader geopolitical tensions and the related impact on energy markets.
Oil prices moved notably lower in early trade, with WTI crude slipping under $88 per barrel and hitting its lowest level since late May. The move came as Iran peace momentum re-entered the market narrative, contributing to a volatile energy backdrop that can ripple through risk assets, including crypto, in the near term.
Market chatter also drew on a widely reported quote attributed to former US President Donald Trump, who was described by Al Jazeera and other outlets as saying that “It’ll happen very soon, and oil prices will come tumbling down” in a tele-rally focused on a Republican candidate. While the tone underscored hopes for easing energy costs, the immediate market reaction remained nuanced, with equities rising while crude prices retreated.
The confluence of these macro threads—energy-price moves, inflation expectations, and geopolitical headlines—helps explain why BTC’s price action continues to contrast with pockets of risk-on appetite in traditional markets.
Looking ahead, traders will be watching how BTC behaves around the $65,000 threshold and whether the 50-month EMA can stabilize or give way to further downside. The upcoming inflation print remains a key catalyst, with market participants parsing the central bank signal as part of a broader assessment of risk assets. As always in crypto, the next moves will hinge on the balance of technical confirmations and macro developments.
Readers should keep an eye on whether BTC can reclaim $65,000 and establish a convincing higher-low, while also monitoring whether the oil and inflation narrative supports a broader risk-on tilt or keeps the market in a cautious, data-driven posture.
Crypto World
Worldcoin eyes further upside as open interest climbs above $449m
Key takeaways
- WLD is down by more than 3% in the last 24 hours and could dip lower in the near term.
- Derivatives metrics remain supportive, with WLD’s Open Interest rising steadily alongside a mildly growing number of long positions.
Worldcoin (WLD) has declined by more than 3% on Tuesday, trading below $0.50 while holding above a cluster of key Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs).
Strengthening derivatives activity and favorable technical indicators suggest the token may have room to extend its recent recovery in the near term.
Rising open interest signals growing market confidence
Data from CoinGlass shows that Worldcoin futures Open Interest (OI) has climbed to $406.86 million, up from $377.25 million recorded on Sunday.
The metric has been trending higher since mid-May, indicating fresh capital is flowing into the market.
An increase in OI is typically viewed as a sign of growing trader participation and can reinforce ongoing price trends. In WLD’s case, the surge suggests investors are increasingly positioning for additional upside.
Adding to the bullish narrative, CoinGlass data shows the WLD long-to-short ratio has recovered to 1.01.
A reading above 1 indicates that long positions slightly outnumber shorts, reflecting a market bias toward higher prices. Continued improvement in this ratio could further strengthen bullish sentiment.
Despite the positive derivatives backdrop, some cautionary signals are emerging. According to CryptoQuant’s market summary data, both spot and futures markets are experiencing elevated retail participation and increasingly heated trading conditions.
The data also points to sell-side dominance, suggesting profit-taking activity could limit the pace of any further gains.
These factors may create short-term headwinds even as broader sentiment remains constructive.
Worldcoin price forecast: Bulls defend key support levels
Worldcoin was trading near $0.509 at the time of writing, maintaining a bullish technical structure above a dense cluster of EMAs.
The 23.6% Fibonacci retracement level near $0.504 has emerged as immediate support, sitting just below the current market price.
Meanwhile, the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day EMAs remain beneath the market, providing a strong support zone stretching from the upper-$0.30 range to the mid-$0.40 area.
Momentum indicators continue to favor buyers. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands near 53, indicating strong bullish momentum while remaining below overbought levels.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator remains in positive territory, signaling that upward momentum is still intact.
If the downtrend continues, immediate support lies at $0.459 (200-day EMA). A daily candle close above this level could expose WLD to lower levels at the mid-$0.30 area near the 100-day and 50-day EMAs
However, if the rally resumes, initial resistance lies at $0.567, with the next target at $0.676 (38.2% Fibonacci retracement).
Worldcoin’s improving derivatives metrics, rising Open Interest, and bullish technical setup continue to support a positive near-term outlook.
While elevated retail participation and selling pressure warrant caution, maintaining support above the $0.50 region could pave the way for a move toward the $0.567 and $0.676 resistance levels in the sessions ahead.
Crypto World
Bitcoin falls back to $61,000 amid broader market bloodbitcoin falls back to $61,000 amid broader market bloodbathath
Higher by more than 1% at the open, the Nasdaq has turned decidedly lower just ahead of the noon hour on the East Coast, now down 1.9% and below its close on Friday.
The S&P 500 is off by 1% and the DJIA is down 0.5%.
Declines are being led by AI favorites like Nvidia, Intel, and Micron, all lower by 2%-4%.
The drop can’t be blamed on Middle East tensions as crude oil is at a session low, down 4% to $87.58 per barrel. Gold and silver are also taking part in the quick dive, each dropping more than 2% over roughly the past hour.
Bitcoin (BTC) is also near its session low at $61,300.
With the AI trade leading losses, bitcoin miners turned AI infrastructure players are all sharply lower. Hut 8 (HUT) is down 6.3%, MARA Holdings (MARA) 4.9%, and IREN (IREN) 8%.
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Evereve – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World4 days ago
Jensen Huang Approves Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron for NVIDIA (NVDA) HBM4 Memory Supply
-
Sports7 days agoFrench Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Rafael Jodar and will play Jakub Mensik in semi-finals
-
Business7 days agoTrump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
-
Crypto World2 days agoAnatomy of the June crypto crash: Fed, Iran, Saylor
-
NewsBeat7 days agoRepublicans balk at Trump’s attempt to appoint a MAGA enforcer to lead National Intelligence
-
Crypto World3 days agoSenator Cynthia Lummis Calls CLARITY Act the Most Consequential Financial Legislation of This Generation
-
Business3 days agoThe Pain Points Taking a Fragile Tech Rally Down a Notch
-
Entertainment3 days agoThe Best Mystery Series of All Time Is Surging on Streaming 30 Years After It Ended
-
Tech4 days agoMicrosoft launches MXC, an OS-level sandbox for AI agents, with OpenAI and Nvidia already on board
-
Tech2 days agoMicrosoft unveils seven homegrown AI models in new bid for ‘long term self-sufficiency’
-
NewsBeat2 days agoAlexander Zverev wins the French Open to finally earn a 1st Grand Slam title
-
Crypto World4 days ago
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
-
Business7 days agoPagerDuty, Inc. (PD) Presents at Bank of America 2026 Global Technology Conference Transcript
-
Tech4 days agoSuspicious Polyfill login prompts pop up on Toshiba, Muji websites
-
Crypto World2 days agoTrump’s AI Ownership Plan Could Benefit Anthropic at OpenAI’s Expense
-
Business4 days ago(VIDEO) Justin Bieber Delivers Surprise Happy Birthday Serenade to Diners at Los Angeles Mexican Restaurant
-
Tech4 days agoMeta steals a tactic from Tesla and builds data centers in tents
-
Tech4 days agoRCS Messages Between iPhone and Android Get End-to-End Encryption With iOS 26.5
-
Crypto World1 day ago
Eli Lilly (LLY) Stock Surges 4% Following Breakthrough Sleep Apnea Trial Results


You must be logged in to post a comment Login