Crypto World
BitMEX Receives 623 BTC Lawsuit Filing the Day It Announces Shutdown
BitMEX has been hit with a new US class action lawsuit accusing the crypto derivatives exchange of fraudulently arranging liquidations to keep traders’ Bitcoin collateral. The complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on Thursday, targets BKX Services Inc. and David Namdar as plaintiffs and is directed at BitMEX operator HDR Global Trading, according to the court filing.
The lawsuit comes at a sensitive moment for the platform: BitMEX has announced it will shut down after a strategic review by its owner, HDR Global Trading, with services scheduled to stop on Sept. 23. BitMEX also plans to prevent users from opening new positions starting Aug. 26.
Key takeaways
- The plaintiffs allege they collectively lost 622.66 BTC due to forced liquidations tied to BitMEX’s automated liquidation mechanics.
- BKX Services claims losses of at least 305.81 BTC, while David Namdar alleges losses exceeding 316.85 BTC, per the lawsuit.
- The filing asserts an internal trading operation could allegedly continue trading during server freezes that supposedly blocked ordinary users from managing positions.
- Customers are seeking return of the allegedly withheld Bitcoin, along with compensatory and punitive damages.
- The case follows a prior class action in 2020 that was dismissed without prejudice on June 30, 2025, and it is being filed as BitMEX prepares to close.
Allegations centered on liquidation design and collateral seizure
According to the complaint, BitMEX permitted customers to use leverage of up to 100 times their collateral and then automatically liquidated positions at prices the plaintiffs argue were set while collateral remained allegedly sufficient to cover the losses. The plaintiffs claim that collateral was still worth twice the losses they say were ultimately incurred during liquidations.
In the plaintiffs’ account, remaining BTC after liquidation was directed into BitMEX’s insurance fund. They argue that this structure allowed the exchange to profit from forced liquidations rather than limit losses strictly to what was necessary under liquidation rules.
Central to the fraud allegations is the plaintiffs’ contention that BitMEX “deliberately developed a system that profited from the liquidations.” The complaint further asserts that an internal desk had access to private customer information and could keep trading while ordinary users allegedly could not access or close positions during server freezes.
Cointelegraph contacted BitMEX for comment but did not receive a response before publication.
Who is suing, and what relief is being sought
The proposed class action seeks the return of allegedly withheld Bitcoin and requests compensatory and punitive damages. The plaintiffs aim to represent US customers who purchased BTC swap products in transactions dating back to July 23, 2018, according to the filing.
The complaint identifies the alleged losses by plaintiff: BKX Services Inc. is said to have lost at least 305.81 BTC, while David Namdar alleges losses exceeding 316.85 BTC. The lawsuit states that the combined total losses alleged across the named plaintiffs amount to 622.66 BTC.
Notably, the new case explicitly frames the dispute around how collateral was handled after liquidations and how access to trading tools may have differed between internal participants and regular customers during alleged service disruptions.
Background: earlier BitMEX class action and a renewed push
While the new filing revives longstanding scrutiny of BitMEX’s internal trading operations and liquidation engine, it is not the first time traders have attempted to pursue legal claims. The complaint references a class action filed in 2020 by Brett Messieh and other traders alleging similar conduct.
That earlier case, which included claims under the Commodity Exchange Act, was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on June 30, 2025. The renewed lawsuit therefore raises the question of how plaintiffs plan to refine or reframe their allegations after that dismissal and what evidence they believe supports the renewed claims.
For BitMEX users, the shift matters because earlier proceedings ended without a final resolution on the merits. A refiled suit suggests plaintiffs believe they can proceed more effectively—whether by adjusting legal theories, assembling additional factual support, or both.
Filed as BitMEX moves toward shutdown
The lawsuit was filed the same day BitMEX announced it would close after 11 years in operation. In its shutdown plan, BitMEX said it would stop providing services on Sept. 23, following a strategic review by HDR Global Trading.
BitMEX has already stopped accepting new registrations. The exchange also plans to prevent users from opening new positions starting on Aug. 26, according to the announcement. The timing is likely to be closely watched by affected traders and counterparties, as the platform’s winding down could affect how quickly claims can be assessed and how remaining customer-related matters are handled operationally.
BitMEX’s closure announcement was also followed by sharp market moves in the exchange’s BMEX utility token, with Cointelegraph reporting a roughly 90% plunge after the shutdown news. While token volatility does not determine the legal merits of the allegations, it underscores the broader uncertainty and reputational pressure that frequently accompany shutdowns and litigation.
Earlier coverage from Cointelegraph noted that BitMEX had already begun delisting a large number of trading pairs and derivatives in July amid its exchange shutdown process.
What to watch next
As the case heads through initial US court steps, the key unknowns will be how the allegations are supported procedurally and factually, and whether BitMEX responds with challenges to the plaintiffs’ theory of fraud and the causal link between alleged liquidation behavior and the claimed Bitcoin losses. With BitMEX preparing to exit the market by Sept. 23, plaintiffs and users will also watch how the shutdown affects evidence access, user documentation, and the practical timeline for any potential recovery.
Crypto World
XRP Price Fails to Complete Cup and Handle as Ripple Introduces Mint to Solve RLUSD Problem
XRP is caught between a compelling technical setup and stubborn overhead price resistance. That gap is testing bullish patience. The cup and handle pattern that traders have tracked for weeks now faces invalidation. XRP trades near $1.11, remaining well below the former $2.68 to $2.77 breakout zone discussed in earlier bullish scenarios.
Ripple has introduced a dedicated Mint function to streamline RLUSD issuance. The update targets minting delays and improves settlement predictability. It strengthens Ripple’s enterprise infrastructure and could make RLUSD more attractive to institutions. However, the direct benefit favors stablecoin adoption more than immediate spot XRP demand.

Regulatory clarity across Ripple’s product suite remains the bigger variable for XRP price. Even so, infrastructure upgrades could improve long-term confidence if institutional usage continues expanding. Until then, traders still need stronger demand to reclaim higher resistance levels.
Meanwhile, the macro backdrop remains challenging. Megacap technology stocks pressured major U.S. indexes as AI spending concerns resurfaced. Tariff headlines also encouraged a risk-off mood across financial markets. When equities weaken, altcoins rarely avoid the selling pressure.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Can XRP Price Reach $5 Before the Cup-and-Handle Breaks Down?
XRP is trading near $1.11, sitting just below a key resistance zone that many analysts continue to monitor. The measured move target around $5.18 still depends on a sustained breakout above previous swing highs. Meanwhile, the 50-day and 200-day EMAs remain below the current price, keeping the long-term trend constructive.
The breakout trigger remains straightforward. A daily close above nearby resistance with strong volume could open the door to a move toward the next resistance zone around $1.30 to $1.40. Until then, XRP may continue trading within its recent range, frustrating both bulls and bears.
On the downside, losing support around $1.08 to $1.10 could invite another test of lower levels. Some wave analysts still warn that a deeper correction is possible if momentum continues fading. However, those bearish projections remain conditional rather than confirmed.
Long-term targets such as $33 to $67 or even $60 are still circulating among well-known XRP analysts. Even so, those are multi-cycle projections rather than near-term expectations. For now, the bigger question is whether XRP can reclaim higher resistance and build enough momentum for a sustained breakout.
Trade XRP on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
LiquidChain Targets Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels
XRP’s cup-and-handle setup illustrates the core frustration of late-cycle positioning: even a technically clean pattern at a $70 billion market cap requires a significant capital event to move the needle. Traders rotating out of stalled large-caps are increasingly looking at early-stage infrastructure plays where the entry price still reflects discovery rather than expectation.
LiquidChain is one project drawing attention. The Layer 3 protocol fuses Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment. It boasts a Unified Liquidity Layer with Single-Step Execution and Verifiable Settlement, meaning developers deploy once and access all three ecosystems without bridging overhead.
The presale is currently priced at $0.01483, with $920K raised to date. The project is approaching the $1M milestone, which historically marks an inflection point in presale momentum.
Explore LiquidChain’s presale details here.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post XRP Price Fails to Complete Cup and Handle as Ripple Introduces Mint to Solve RLUSD Problem appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Solana Tokenized-Equity Volume Is Up Roughly 2,400x Year-Over-Year
Tokenized equities volume on Solana jumped from $1.34 million to $3.32 billion over the past year. Solana commented on this development with “Internet Capital Markets.”
The figure marks a roughly 2,400-fold increase. It points to accelerating institutional interest in onchain capital markets.
Solana Equities Lead a Broader Tokenization Surge
The growth mirrors a wider shift across tokenized assets on the network. Monthly volume across commodities, credit, collectibles, and equities climbed from roughly $156 million in June 2025 to several billion dollars a year later. Solana’s official account shared the chart data on X.
Equities alone rose from $670 million in April to $3.3 billion in June, an all-time high for the category. That expansion follows a Securitize NYSE debut. Securitize listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in July and tokenized SpaceX-linked SECZ shares on the network.
The trend also builds on a new tokenization record set earlier this summer. SOL price, however, lagged behind the network’s onchain growth.
The token trades near $76, down more than 2% over the past day, according to BeInCrypto data. Tokenized stocks on the network totaled $4.9 billion in the first half of 2026. That figure marks a sixfold jump from $775 million in the back half of 2025.
Horsley Frames Solana Data as Validation
Horsley is co-founder and chief executive officer of Bitwise Asset Management. He framed the jump as evidence that traditional finance is migrating onchain.
The network reportedly processed more than 95% of global cross-chain tokenized stock volume in recent weeks. That figure comes from the report Horsley cited.
Grayscale analysts likewise named five altcoins benefiting from tokenization that could gain further if the momentum continues. Their thesis rests on the same trend Horsley described, namely that issuers keep choosing the network for onchain listings.
Institutional Interest Extends Beyond the US
The trend extends well beyond American markets. SBI Holdings recently struck a partnership with Solana Foundation to build onchain financial infrastructure for Japan. The deal targets yen-pegged stablecoins alongside tokenized assets.
Still, the broader picture carries a caveat. A recent industry report found that roughly half of the broader tokenization market shows no weekly trading activity at all. Headline volume figures, meanwhile, keep climbing.
Whether the pace continues may depend on how many more issuers choose to list shares onchain in the months ahead. That trend matters more than any single report or announcement.
The post Solana Tokenized-Equity Volume Is Up Roughly 2,400x Year-Over-Year appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Bears maintain control for ADA as mixed derivatives signal market uncertainty
Key takeaways
- Cardano (ADA) is trading below $0.168 after being rejected at the 50-day EMA.
- Derivatives data presents mixed signals, with the long-to-short ratio remaining bullish while funding rates have turned negative.
- Large Cardano whales have accumulated approximately 120 million ADA since Monday.
Cardano (ADA) extended its losses on Friday, trading below $0.168 after buyers failed to overcome resistance at the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) earlier in the week.
Although some large investors continue accumulating ADA, mixed derivatives data and subdued technical indicators suggest the market remains uncertain about the cryptocurrency’s next major move.
Derivatives data reflects divided trader sentiment
Cardano’s derivatives market is sending conflicting signals. According to CoinGlass data, ADA’s long-to-short ratio stood at 1.07 on Friday.
A reading above one indicates that more traders are positioning for price gains than declines, reflecting a modest bullish bias among leveraged traders.
However, other derivatives metrics tell a different story. Cardano’s perpetual futures funding rates flipped into negative territory on Thursday and remained at approximately -0.014 on Friday.
Negative funding rates indicate that short sellers are paying long-position holders, typically signaling increased bearish sentiment and expectations of further downside.
The contrast between bullish positioning and negative funding highlights growing uncertainty among traders.
On-chain data suggests larger investors have continued buying despite recent price weakness.
According to Santiment, wallets holding 1 million to 10 million ADA and 10 million to 100 million ADA have accumulated approximately 120 million ADA since Monday.
Meanwhile, wallets containing 100,000 to 1 million ADA have shown relatively little activity.
The selective accumulation by larger holders may indicate confidence in Cardano’s longer-term outlook, although the buying has not yet been strong enough to trigger a broader shift in market sentiment.
ADA remains below major moving averages
From a technical standpoint, Cardano continues to trade within a broader bearish structure.
ADA remains below the 50-day EMA ($0.176), the 100-day EMA ($0.202), and the 200-day EMA ($0.267)
The inability to reclaim these levels suggests sellers remain in control of the medium-term trend.
Technical momentum indicators point to a market lacking clear direction. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is hovering near 48, reflecting balanced buying and selling pressure without a strong trend.
Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remains slightly above the zero line, suggesting that although occasional recovery attempts continue, bullish momentum remains relatively weak.
Adding to the technical challenge, a previously broken long-term downtrend line near $0.197 has now become a significant resistance level.
For bullish momentum to strengthen, ADA must first overcome several nearby resistance levels, including $0.176 (50-day EMA) and $0.197 (former long-term trendline resistance).
A sustained move above these barriers would improve Cardano’s short-term outlook.
On the downside, traders are watching:
- $0.150 – Immediate horizontal support
- $0.138 – Key Fibonacci support
A break below $0.138 could expose ADA to fresh lows and reinforce the broader bearish trend.
Cardano continues to face selling pressure after failing to reclaim the 50-day EMA, while mixed derivatives signals reflect uncertainty among market participants.
For now, ADA’s ability to hold above $0.150 while reclaiming the $0.173-$0.176 resistance zone will likely determine whether the token can build a stronger recovery or extend its recent decline.
Crypto World
Nasdaq listed Zhibao plans 3,500 Bitcoin treasury through proposed PIPE
Zhibao Technology has signed a non-binding agreement that could bring about 3,500 Bitcoin, valued at roughly $220 million, onto its balance sheet through a proposed stock sale paid in BTC.
Summary
- Zhibao has signed a non binding agreement to receive about 3,500 Bitcoin through a proposed $220 million stock sale.
- The proposed deal would give the investor majority control of Zhibao’s board while establishing a Bitcoin treasury if completed.
- The announcement comes as public companies continue adopting different strategies to build or manage Bitcoin reserves.
According to a Wednesday press release from Nasdaq-listed Zhibao Technology, the Shanghai-based digital insurance company has entered into a non-binding term sheet with Joyertech and Information OPC for a proposed private investment in public equity (PIPE) financing that would be settled using approximately 3,500 Bitcoin instead of cash.
If completed, the buyer or its designated entity would subscribe to newly issued securities, with the Bitcoin amount remaining subject to final valuation, custodial arrangements, audit verification, regulatory review, Nasdaq compliance and the execution of definitive agreements.
The proposed transaction would do more than add Bitcoin to the company’s balance sheet. Under the term sheet, Joyertech is expected to nominate a majority of Zhibao’s board members when the financing closes, giving the investor effective control of the company while Zhibao continues operating its existing insurance business during the initial transition period.
A PIPE financing allows private investors to purchase newly issued shares directly from a publicly listed company instead of acquiring stock through public markets. In this case, the consideration would be Bitcoin rather than cash, allowing Zhibao to establish a sizeable Bitcoin treasury immediately if the transaction receives final approval.
The company, which trades on Nasdaq under the ticker ZBAO, describes itself as a digital insurance technology provider focused on China’s embedded insurance market. It launched what it describes as the country’s first digital insurance brokerage platform in 2020 using its own cloud-based platform-as-a-service infrastructure.
Bitcoin-funded treasury proposal reshapes ownership
While the insurance business would continue operating after the financing, company disclosures indicate the current management team is expected to oversee day-to-day operations only until a future separation, disposal or restructuring of the legacy business is completed.
The structure differs from the path followed by many public companies that first raise cash before purchasing Bitcoin in the open market. Instead, the proposed financing would transfer Bitcoin directly to the company as payment for newly issued shares, allowing the treasury to be established as part of the financing itself.
Investor reaction was immediate after the announcement. Zhibao shares climbed from about $0.15 to nearly $0.40 within four hours before giving back part of the gains and stabilizing near $0.24 later in the session. Even after the pullback, the stock remained roughly 60% above its pre-announcement level.
Only a week earlier, on July 15, Zhibao disclosed that it had received a Nasdaq deficiency notice after its share price traded below the exchange’s minimum $1 bid requirement. At the time, the stock was changing hands around $0.22. The company now has until Jan. 6, 2027, to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s listing standards.
Treasury strategies continue to diversify
The proposal arrives as public companies continue experimenting with different ways to build Bitcoin reserves, although recent announcements show that no single treasury model has emerged.
Unlike companies that depend on repeated share offerings to fund Bitcoin purchases, some businesses are tying future accumulation to operating cash flow. Earlier this month, ORANGE JUICE announced it had raised $40 million to acquire profitable American businesses, with surplus cash from those operations expected to finance future Bitcoin purchases alongside additional acquisitions.
Other firms continue to rely on capital markets. Earlier this month, Japan’s Bitcoin Japan secured plans to raise approximately 9.66 billion yen, allocating about 662 million yen for its first funded Bitcoin treasury purchase after a previous fundraising effort failed to provide enough capital for digital asset acquisitions.
Capital B has taken another route by expanding its financing capacity before making additional purchases. In June, shareholders approved a framework authorizing up to €5 billion in capital increases and €100 billion in credit instruments to support future Bitcoin acquisitions as part of the French company’s long-term treasury strategy.
Not every treasury company is increasing its Bitcoin exposure, however. Earlier this month, Empery disclosed that it had sold 1,400 Bitcoin for about $87.1 million since May, using the proceeds to repay debt, finance acquisitions, cover legal expenses and strengthen liquidity while maintaining a smaller Bitcoin reserve.
More than 150 publicly traded companies now hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets, although recent developments have shown that treasury strategies increasingly depend on each company’s financing needs, operating model and balance sheet priorities rather than a single playbook.
For Zhibao, however, the proposed transaction remains far from complete. Company filings state that the agreement is non-binding and still depends on satisfactory legal, financial and operational due diligence, execution of definitive agreements, corporate and regulatory approvals, continued Nasdaq compliance and other customary closing conditions before any Bitcoin changes hands.
Crypto World
EU Expands Belarus Crypto Ownership Ban to All Service Providers
The European Union is tightening its crypto-related sanctions against Belarus by extending a prohibition on certain crypto roles and ownership interests to a broader range of service providers under the EU’s MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) framework.
According to the EU’s Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1847, adopted on Thursday, Belarusian nationals and residents will be barred from owning, controlling, or managing EU-based crypto exchange and other MiCA-regulated crypto service entities starting Aug. 25. The decision also sets an earlier entry into force date of July 24 for the underlying legal instrument.
Key takeaways
- The EU sanctions change is set by Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1847 and will apply to additional crypto-asset activities from Aug. 25.
- Belarusian nationals and residents cannot own or control EU entities providing MiCA-defined crypto services, nor hold positions on their governing bodies.
- The expansion builds on a prior restriction that focused only on wallet, account, and custody-type services.
- The update arrives shortly after MiCA’s transition period ended on July 1, intensifying compliance pressure on crypto firms operating in the EU.
- It fits into a wider EU strategy to disrupt crypto-related pathways described as supporting Russia’s sanctions evasion.
What the EU sanctions amendment changes
The EU decision, published under Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1847, amends the bloc’s sanctions framework aimed at Belarus. While an earlier restriction applied to companies providing crypto wallet, account, or custody services, the new measure broadens the scope to cover “any other crypto-asset services” that fall within MiCA’s regulatory categories.
From Aug. 25, the prohibition will extend to EU-based entities offering these services if the entity is subject to MiCA’s defined service classifications. Under the amendment, Belarusian nationals and residents are barred from:
- Owning or controlling such an EU-based entity; and
- Holding positions on its governing body.
MiCA’s service categories, as set out in the MiCA regulation, include activities such as operating trading platforms, exchanging crypto assets, executing and transmitting client orders, placing crypto assets, providing transfers, and offering investment advice or portfolio management. The restriction is therefore not limited to custody or retail wallet services, but can reach a wider set of operational roles involved in crypto market infrastructure and client-facing financial functions.
The decision itself indicates July 24 as the entry into force date for the overall legal act, while the expanded crypto provision specifically starts on Aug. 25.
MiCA transition ends, enforcement pressure rises
The sanctions expansion comes in close proximity to a major regulatory milestone: the end of MiCA’s transition period on July 1. Cointelegraph previously reported that when the MiCA transition concluded, crypto companies lacking proper authorization were ordered to wind down or face enforcement actions (coverage referenced in the original material). That shift matters because, in practice, sanctions aimed at the ownership and governance of MiCA-regulated firms can directly affect corporate structures, board composition, and controlling interests of operators seeking to comply with EU authorization rules.
With the transition window closed, the EU’s approach becomes less about “temporary” arrangements and more about formal regulatory alignment—while simultaneously tightening sanctions rules that constrain who can sit in ownership and management positions within regulated crypto businesses.
Part of a wider EU effort targeting Russia-linked crypto pathways
Beyond Belarus, the EU has been escalating efforts tied to Russia-related sanctions evasion through financial networks, including crypto. As described in the referenced original material, on Thursday the EU—within its 21st sanctions package against Russia—extended a transaction ban to 14 crypto-related service platforms outside the bloc. The package also introduced a mechanism intended to allow the EU to prohibit dealings with any foreign crypto provider used by Russia to evade sanctions.
The decision further builds on an earlier June 11 proposal that targeted 11 crypto platforms, according to the original coverage cited. Taken together, these steps signal that the EU is using sanctions as both a direct tool (blocking specific providers or transactions) and an indirect governance lever (restricting who may control or manage certain regulated entities).
Broader sanctions friction: UK action and disputes around platform-linked allegations
The EU’s tightening measures also follow similar steps in other jurisdictions. Earlier, the UK reportedly sanctioned Huobi Global S.A., the Panamanian company behind HTX, on May 26, alleging support for Russia-linked financial networks involving sanctioned entities A7 and Garantex—an account reflected in the original material. HTX denied wrongdoing and, in commentary shared with Cointelegraph in the referenced coverage, stated that regulatory compliance remains a top priority and that it adheres to the regulatory frameworks of the jurisdictions where it operates.
While the EU’s new Belarus-focused amendment does not depend on those UK allegations, the parallel underscores a recurring pattern in enforcement discussions: regulators and sanctions bodies are increasingly focused on the operational role crypto platforms and related service providers can play in cross-border capital movement—whether via direct compliance frameworks or via allegations of linkage to sanctioned networks.
What EU-regulated crypto firms should watch next
For operators inside the EU, the key risk is not only whether a service provider has a MiCA authorization, but also whether its ownership and governance structure could run afoul of sanctions rules as expanded. Compliance teams should monitor the July 24 entry into force and the Aug. 25 start date carefully, and review board and controlling-interest arrangements to ensure they match both MiCA obligations and the evolving sanctions prohibitions.
Crypto World
DOGE slides below $0.070 as market sentiment weakens
Key takeaways
- Dogecoin (DOGE) is trading below $0.070 after dropping 5% in the previous session.
- Risk-off sentiment driven by geopolitical tensions has reduced demand for speculative assets like meme coins.
- DOGE futures open interest has declined, while trading volume has surged 76%, indicating increased retail activity.
Dogecoin (DOGE) remained under pressure on Friday, trading below $0.070 after suffering a 5% decline in the previous trading session.
The world’s largest memecoin has weakened alongside the broader cryptocurrency market as investors reduce exposure to speculative assets amid heightened geopolitical tensions and deteriorating market sentiment.
Geopolitical uncertainty weighs on memecoins
Dogecoin has historically been one of the most sentiment-driven cryptocurrencies, with its price closely tied to retail investor enthusiasm and broader market risk appetite.
Recent geopolitical developments, including escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, have pushed investors toward a more cautious stance.
The decline in market confidence is reflected in CoinMarketCap’s Fear & Greed Index, which dropped to 37 on Friday from 40 earlier in the week, signaling that sentiment is shifting further toward fear.
As speculative demand fades, meme coins such as DOGE have experienced stronger selling pressure than many larger cryptocurrencies.
Dogecoin’s derivatives market presents a mixed picture. According to CoinGlass, DOGE futures open interest declined to approximately $1.10 billion, indicating a slight reduction in outstanding leveraged positions.
However, futures trading volume surged 76% to around $1.38 billion, suggesting retail traders remain highly active despite the recent price decline.
The increase in trading activity alongside falling prices points to heightened volatility rather than renewed bullish conviction.
Additional derivatives indicators continue to favor sellers. DOGE’s perpetual futures funding rate slipped to approximately -0.0016%, indicating that short sellers are paying long-position holders.
Negative funding rates generally reflect bearish market expectations and growing demand for short positions.
DOGE remains below key technical levels
From a technical perspective, Dogecoin continues to trade within a well-established downtrend.
The meme coin remains below both the 50-day EMA at $0.0788 and the 200-day EMA at $0.1032
Remaining beneath these indicators keeps the short-term and medium-term outlook tilted in favor of sellers.
Momentum indicators show bearish conditions persist, although DOGE is approaching oversold territory.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is hovering near 31, indicating selling pressure remains strong, and the asset is nearing levels where buyers may begin looking for value.
Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) is testing its signal line, suggesting bearish momentum may continue building if sellers maintain control.
The next important support level lies at $0.0641. A daily close below this level could accelerate losses and trigger another wave of selling.
On the upside, buyers must overcome several resistance levels before sentiment can improve:
- $0.0700 – Immediate resistance
- $0.0777 – Secondary resistance
- $0.0788 – 50-day EMA
Together, these levels form a significant resistance zone that bulls must reclaim to signal a potential trend reversal.
Dogecoin remains vulnerable as weakening market sentiment and geopolitical uncertainty continue to pressure speculative assets.
Unless broader market sentiment improves and DOGE reclaims the $0.070–$0.079 resistance zone, the meme coin could remain on course to test support near $0.0641 in the coming sessions.
Crypto World
DEX Aggregator Odos is Shutting Down: What Users Need to Do Before July 30
Odos is a popular decentralized exchange aggregator that helps users find efficient token swap routes across numerous DEXs and liquidity sources. Instead of acting as a custodian of user funds, the protocol is designed to let traders connect their own wallets and execute on-chain transactions. During this process, they retain full control of their assets, which never leave their custody.
The company behind it, however, has announced on July 23rd that it’s winding down operations, with the application entering read-only mode on July 27th. All company-operated services will permanently shut down on July 30, 2026.
The team has emphasized that Odos is non-custodial and has provided instructions for users seeking different guidance, so the following breaks down the most common questions you may have.
What Happens on July 27 and July 30 Regarding Odos DEX?
Can I still use Odos to swap tokens?
Yes, but only for a limited time. Existing users can continue to use the platform freely and as usual until July 27. On that date, the application will switch to read-only mode. From that day until July 30, users will only be able to view wallet balances and transaction histories. They will not be able to execute new swaps or any other interactive functions on the protocol.
Can I create a new account or wallet?
No. New account registrations, wallet creation through ODos, and new limit orders were disabled on the day the announcement to wind down was made – on July 23rd.
Will my crypto disappear after the shutdown?
No. As we mentioned above, Odos is non-custodial. This means that the company doesn’t hold any of your funds. Your crypto remains on the respective blockchain and is controlled by you, not by Odos.
Do I Need to Move My Funds?
I connected MetaMask, Rabby, Ledger, or another wallet. Do I need to do anything?
In most cases, no. If you used a self-custody wallet, your assets remained accessible through that wallet after Odos shuts down. You can simply continue using another aggregator or DeFi application going forward.
I created my wallet using Google, Apple, email, or another social login. What should I do?
If your wallet was created directly through Odos using a social or email login, the company advises that you should transfer your assets to another wallet or export your private key before July 30. Although instructions to access your wallet will remain available on the Odos official page even after the shutdown, completing the process early reduces the risk of unnecessary complications later.
Will the ODOS token disappear?
No. The ODOS token exists on-chain and is independent of the aggregator’s functioning. According to the company, it doesn’t take custody of the token or act as its market maker. This means that the shutdown shouldn’t alter its underlying on-chain mechanics.
The team also said that the Odos DAO operates separately from the company and that it will communicate any future decisions independently.
To the Odos community: after much consideration, the operating company behind Odos is winding down its operations. The app moves to read-only on July 27, and all Odos services shut down permanently on July 30, 2026. Odos is non-custodial: your assets remain yours and on-chain. If… pic.twitter.com/9btbBLyhRL
— ODOS (@odosprotocol) July 23, 2026
The post DEX Aggregator Odos is Shutting Down: What Users Need to Do Before July 30 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Ethereum’s Falling Fees Do Not Mean Falling Use, Bitwise Finds
Ethereum (ETH) network fee revenue fell 51% year-on-year to roughly $64 million in the second quarter, even as transaction activity rose and staking climbed to a record, according to a new Bitwise report.
The decline reflected cheaper and more abundant blockspace rather than fading interest, the asset manager said. Measured in ETH, quarterly revenue actually rose for the first time in over a year.
Ethereum Activity Rises Even as Revenue Drops 51%, Bitwise Finds
Ethereum revenue reached about $131 million in the second quarter of 2025. A year later, it stood near $64 million, a sharp drop in dollar terms.
Usage moved the other way. Ethereum processed 203.9 million transactions in the quarter, up from 121.1 million a year earlier. Throughput rose to 26 transactions per second, from 15. This came as Ethereum’s block gas limit increased to 60 million.
“The divergence between revenue and activity is the theme of the quarter. While fees fell, usage climbed,” the report read.
Researchers at Bitwise attributed the gap to protocol design. Networks made blockspace cheaper and more abundant, enabling users to pay less per transaction.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
The Dollar Drop Was Partly a Price Effect
The USD figure also masked a shift beneath the surface. In ETH terms, revenue rose from 27,670 ETH in the first quarter to 31,166 ETH in the second quarter.
That marked the first quarterly increase in over a year. The dollar total fell mainly because ETH’s price weakened during the period.
Staking followed the same upward path. Active stake reached a record 40.2 million ETH, representing about 33% of total supply, amid continued institutional inflows.
The pattern extended beyond Ethereum. Solana (SOL) processed 9.8 billion non-voting transactions, near its all-time high, while dollar revenue fell.
Avalanche (AVAX) handled 236 million transactions on its C-Chain, up from 58 million a year earlier. Lower congestion, not weaker use, brought fees down.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Ethereum’s Falling Fees Do Not Mean Falling Use, Bitwise Finds appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
EU Widens Belarus Crypto Ownership Ban Under MiCA
The European Union will prohibit Belarusian nationals and residents from owning, controlling or managing crypto exchanges and other crypto service providers regulated under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework starting Aug. 25.
The measure appears in Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1847, adopted Thursday to amend the EU’s sanctions framework targeting Belarus over its involvement in Russia’s war against Ukraine. The document expands an existing restriction that applied only to companies providing crypto wallet, account or custody services.
The decision enters into force on July 24, while the expanded crypto provision will apply from Aug. 25.
Under the amendment, Belarusian nationals and residents may not own or control an EU-based entity providing “any other crypto-asset services” as defined under MiCA or hold a position on its governing body.
MiCA’s service categories include operating trading platforms, exchanging crypto assets, executing and transmitting client orders, placing crypto assets, providing transfers, offering investment advice or portfolio management.
EU expands crypto sanctions after MiCA transition ends
The sanctions expansion comes weeks after the end of MiCA’s transition period on July 1. Crypto companies without authorization were ordered to wind down or face enforcement actions.
Related: Ripple secures full MiCA license for crypto services across Europe
The Belarus restriction follows a broader EU push to target crypto platforms and financial networks accused of helping Russia evade sanctions imposed over its war in Ukraine.
On Thursday, as part of its 21st sanctions package against Russia, the EU extended its transaction ban to 14 crypto-related service platforms outside the bloc and introduced a mechanism allowing it to prohibit dealings with any foreign crypto provider used by Russia to evade sanctions. The final package expands on the June 11 proposal, which targeted 11 crypto platforms.
The proposal followed the United Kingdom’s May 26 sanctions against Huobi Global S.A., the Panamanian company behind HTX, over alleged support for Russia-linked financial networks involving sanctioned entities A7 and Garantex.
HTX denied wrongdoing, telling Cointelegraph that regulatory compliance “remains our absolute top priority” and that it strictly adheres to regulatory frameworks in the jurisdictions where it operates.
Magazine: Why Australia’s $17B crypto opportunity depends on regulation
Crypto World
Crypto Price Analysis July-24: ETH, XRP, ADA, BNB, and HYPE
This Friday, we examine Ethereum, Ripple, Cardano, Binance Coin, and Hyperliquid in greater detail.
Ethereum (ETH)
Ethereum moved higher by 3% this week as buyers gained control of the price action since late June. This relief rally started once the support at $1,500 was tested and held.
At the time of this post, ETH is facing some resistance as the price approaches the key psychological level at $2,000. It is likely to bring back sellers and could send the price into a pullback.
Looking ahead, the cryptocurrency remains in a macro downtrend. While this rally is a positive change, sustaining it beyond $2,000 seems a big ask right now. Only if $2,000 turns into support does ETH have a good shot at breaking the prevailing downtrend.

Ripple (XRP)
XRP also managed to book a 3% gain this week as buyers have kept the price well above the key support at $1. The current resistance is at $1.2, and until it is broken, it is unlikely this cryptocurrency can make sustained gains.
With volume declining steadily month-over-month, XRP currently lacks the momentum for a major breakout. Market participants seem to have retreated since the drop in February and have not returned to date.
Looking ahead, the current consolidation above $1 is a positive development. However, it can equally be a pause taken by sellers before they attempt another go at the key support.

Cardano (ADA)
ADA had a positive week, closing 6% higher. This comes after the price made a head and shoulders reversal pattern with the key support around $0.15. As long as that level holds, buyers have the advantage.
Nevertheless, Cardano still has to make clear higher lows and higher highs before we can be confident in a reversal and end to the current macro downtrend. For that to happen, the price will have to move beyond $0.25.
Looking ahead, the weekly momentum indicators such as the MACD are giving a bullish bias. This is a promising sign that sellers could be exhausted here, which may allow buyers to take back control for a longer period.

Binance Coin (BNB)
Binance Coin looks weak throughout the past seven days and made no gains. The price still needs to break the resistance at $580, which has kept buyers in check over the past month. Without a clear breakout, BNB is forced to move sideways or even seek lower levels to find buyers.
The price also saw decreased volatility and volume. This could also be related to the recent regulatory changes that forced EU users to find a new exchange. That is bearish for the BNB price as it lowers demand for the token.
Looking ahead, this cryptocurrency is found in a downtrend with no signs that this will end any time soon. As such, watch the support at $500, which could be tested in the future before buyers return.

Hype (HYPE)
Surprisingly, HYPE was flat this week and lost 5% of its valuation in the past month. This highlights that the uptrend may be over. The price is also under $60 at the time of this post, which is concerning since it may encourage sellers to push even lower.
If this cryptocurrency loses its macro uptrend, then a larger and more significant correction could follow. Right now, the longer the price sits under $60, the higher the chance that HYPE will fall much lower. Key support levels are found at $56 and $52.
Looking ahead, HYPE had a fantastic rally in the first half of 2026, and it seems the second part of the year could end up in a major correction. That may see HYPE revisit previous levels under $50. If so, this can also be a key buying opportunity.

The post Crypto Price Analysis July-24: ETH, XRP, ADA, BNB, and HYPE appeared first on CryptoPotato.
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Politics6 days agoThe House | The City of London can help the new chancellor deliver growth in every postcode
-
Crypto World6 days agoRipple Payments Joins MiCA With 14 Firms, Does It Mean Anything For XRP?
-
Crypto World7 days agoTwo July Windows Left: The CLARITY Act’s Senate Fight and What Failure Means
-
Politics5 days agoDemocrats look to World Cup watch parties to register thousands of voters
-
Crypto World6 days agoRipple wins EU-wide access as ESMA adds it to MiCA register
-
Crypto World3 days agoGrayscale Files For Worldcoin ETF, WLD Registers Sharp Rise
-
Tech3 days agoSail Virtually Aboard The “Itanic” With IA-64 Emulator
-
NewsBeat4 days agoUnregistered fitter used Gas Safe logo on business flyers
-
Tech3 days ago
Turtle Beach Command Series KB7 review: a nifty screen-equipped gaming keyboard
-
NewsBeat7 days agoRegistration is now open for March for Men with Kev 2026
-
News Videos5 days agoBig Money Is Entering XRP
-
Business2 days agoNew Jersey voter registration controversy explained: How 6,600 noncitizens got on the rolls, and what happens next
-
Crypto World6 days agoKaspersky exposes OkoBot’s 20-module crypto wallet attack
-
Business7 days agoAirlines warn Sunshine Protection Act could disrupt flight scheduling
-
Entertainment3 days agoJohnny Depp’s R-Rated Gothic Cult Classic Gets New Release Ahead of Sydney Sweeney Remake
-
NewsBeat6 days agoDurham County Council to send out electoral registration emails
-
Crypto World6 days agoMiCA Licensing Faces Delays as ESMA Adds 14 CASPs to Register
-
Crypto World1 day agoEthics, other provisions in crypto Clarity Act to be further discussed
-
Crypto World6 days agoChip Stocks Enter Bear Market After Moonshot Ai Unveils Kimi K3 Model


You must be logged in to post a comment Login