Crypto World
DCENT S Wallet vs Tangem: Full Comparison of Design, Security, Supported Coins, and Mobile App
The hardware wallet market has seen a quiet revolution over the past few years. Even though traditional USB-style devices like Ledger and Trezor still dominate the conversation, a new category of card-shaped cold wallets has emerged. These devices look like credit cards, fit in your wallet, and use NFC to sign transactions. No cables, no batteries, no Bluetooth pairing. Just tap and go.
Two names stand out here; DCENT S and Tangem. Both use EAL6+ certified secure elements, and both promise to make self-custody easier than ever. But they take fundamentally different approaches to one critical area – backup and recovery. This single difference shapes everything else about how these wallets work and who they are for.
DCENT S launched in July 2026 as the latest offering from IOTRUST, a South Korean company with years of hardware wallet engineering experience. Tangem has been around longer and comes from Switzerland, with a strong focus on simplicity and beginner accessibility. Both have loyal followings, but they serve slightly different users.
This comparison breaks down every important aspect of these two wallets so you can decide which one fits your needs. We will look at design, security, backup systems, supported assets, daily usability, mobile apps, and overall value.
DCENT S vs Tangem: Quick Comparison
Design & Build Quality
Both wallets use a credit-card-sized form factor. The DCENT S measures 85.6 by 54 millimeters and comes in at just 0.9 millimeters thick. That is thinner than most standard payment cards. Tangem is similarly sized and feels just as slim and lightweight. Both devices fit easily into any wallet slot alongside your other cards.
Tangem offers an additional form factor that D’CENT does not; a wearable ring. If you prefer something even more convenient than a card, the Tangem ring lets you carry your wallet on your finger. It is a nice option for people who do not want to carry another card or who simply like the novelty of a crypto ring.

The build quality on both is excellent. DCENT S carries an IP69 dust and water resistance rating, while Tangem goes slightly higher with IP69K. In practical terms, both can survive being dropped in water, exposed to dust, and subjected to everyday wear and tear. Tangem also advertises resistance to X-rays, electrostatic discharge, and electromagnetic pulses, which adds another layer of durability for people who travel frequently or work in environments where such exposure is possible.
Temperature tolerances are similar. DCENT S operates from minus 30 to plus 50 degrees Celsius, while Tangem works from roughly minus 25 to plus 50 degrees Celsius. Either wallet will function in hot cars, freezing winters, or tropical climates.
The one difference that stands out is that Tangem offers a 25-year warranty on their hardware, while DCENT S provides a limited lifetime warranty. Both are generous, and neither company expects you to replace your wallet anytime soon.
Security & Private Key Protection
This is where both wallets are remarkably similar – and that is a good thing. Both use EAL6+ certified secure elements. This is the same level of security certification used for government IDs, passports, and EMV payment cards. It protects against both invasive physical attacks and non-invasive side-channel attacks.
The private key generation process is identical in concept. When you set up either wallet, the secure element generates your private key on-device. The key never leaves the chip under any circumstances. It never touches your smartphone, never goes to the cloud, and never gets stored on company servers.
Both wallets are battery-free and get powered entirely by your phone’s NFC field during signing sessions. This means there is no always-on power source that could be exploited. The card is inert until you tap it against your phone, which significantly reduces the attack surface compared to Bluetooth-enabled wallets that remain discoverable.

Tangem adds anti-counterfeit verification through their app, which lets you confirm that your card is genuine before you use it. DCENT S does not emphasize this feature in their marketing, though the secure element itself provides strong protection against cloning attempts.
Firmware security is another point where Tangem has an edge in transparency. They have had their firmware independently audited by Kudelski Security in 2018 and Riscure in 2023. DCENT S is newer to the market, and while their secure element is certified, they have not published equivalent third-party audit results at this stage.
Both wallets lock themselves automatically after repeated incorrect PIN entries, and both include tamper protection that locks the card if someone attempts to physically extract the chip.
Backup & Recovery
This is where the two wallets diverge completely, and it is the single most important difference between them.
DCENT S uses what they call the R3covery Card. Every box contains two cards – the main DCENT S for everyday transactions and a dedicated recovery card. The recovery card cannot sign transactions. Its only purpose is to restore your wallet if you lose your primary card. The backup is stored inside another EAL6+ secure chip, so your recovery data is never displayed as words, never written on paper, and never typed anywhere.
If you lose your DCENT S, you tap the R3covery Card against your phone, restore the wallet, and then move everything to a new DCENT S card. The recovery card itself remains a high-value target because whoever holds it can restore your wallet. The company recommends storing the two cards in different physical locations.
Tangem takes a different approach. Instead of a dedicated recovery card, they sell wallet sets that include two or three identical cards (or combinations of cards and a ring). During setup, the private key is securely copied to all devices in the set. Any of these duplicate cards can function as the primary wallet. If you lose one card, you simply use another from your set.
The Tangem approach means you do not need to order a replacement card just to restore access. You already have a backup ready to go. The downside is that every card in your set can sign transactions. If someone gets hold of one of your backup cards and knows your PIN, they have full access to your funds. With DCENT S, the recovery card cannot sign anything, so even if stolen, it is useless without the main card and PIN.
There is a trade-off here. Tangem offers immediate redundancy – you have multiple working cards from day one. DCENT S offers a recovery-only backup that cannot be misused for transactions but requires you to obtain a new primary card after loss.
Supported Coins & Networks
DCENT S supports over 100 blockchain networks and more than 4,900 tokens. Tangem supports more than 90 blockchain networks and over 14,000 tokens.
In practice, both wallets cover all the major assets you are likely to hold. Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, Stellar, Polygon, and BNB Chain are supported on both. New chains are added through app updates on both platforms, so you do not need to update the physical card firmware.
Where DCENT S distinguishes itself is in XRP support. The company has been working with the XRP Ledger since 2018, and they make a point of emphasizing full XRPL functionality. Trust Lines, decentralized applications, swaps, sending, receiving, and holding XRP are all fully supported. If you are active on the XRP Ledger, DCENT S feels like it was built specifically for you.
Tangem supports XRP as well, but they do not make it a central part of their marketing. For most users, both wallets cover everything they need. The difference in token count is more about counting methodology than actual compatibility.
Ease of Setup & Daily Use
Both wallets are exceptionally easy to set up. Tangem claims a two-minute setup time, while DCENT S estimates three minutes. In reality, both are fast enough that the difference is negligible. You download the app, tap the card, create a PIN, and you are ready to send and receive crypto.
Daily use is where the similarity continues. Both wallets require an NFC-enabled Android or iPhone. You open the app, create a transaction, tap the card against your phone, wait about one second for the signing to complete, and the transaction is broadcast. No cables, no pairing, no charging.
Neither wallet has a display, which means you cannot verify transaction details directly on the device. You rely on the app to show you the transaction details before you sign. This is a trade-off for the card form factor – traditional hardware wallets with screens offer an extra layer of verification that these card wallets cannot provide.
For people who frequently use their crypto on mobile devices, both wallets feel natural. The tap-to-sign workflow is almost identical to using a contactless payment card. It takes the friction out of self-custody and makes it feel like a normal part of your daily routine.
Mobile App Experience
The DCENT app and Tangem app both serve as the primary interface for managing your assets. They let you send and receive crypto, view your portfolio, and track transaction history. Both apps are available for Android and iOS.
Tangem’s app has been around longer and benefits from more mature feature development. It offers built-in swapping through integrated providers, staking support for certain assets, and the ability to connect to decentralized applications. The portfolio tracking and market price features are polished and regularly updated.
DCENT’s app is part of a broader ecosystem that includes their other hardware wallet products. It is clean, functional, and gets the job done. The app supports swapping, portfolio tracking, and all the basic functions you need. It may not have quite as many built-in services as Tangem, but it covers the essentials well.
Both apps are beginner-friendly and do not assume prior experience with cryptocurrency. If you can use a basic banking app, you can use either of these.
Price & Value
Pricing for both wallets depends on the configuration you choose. Tangem offers two-card and three-card sets, with higher prices for larger sets. The ring version is also priced higher than the card version. DCENT S comes as a single primary card plus the R3covery Card in every box.
DCENT S launched with free U.S. shipping, delivered duty paid, a 30-day money-back guarantee, and a limited lifetime warranty. Tangem typically offers similar shipping options and warranty coverage, though their standard warranty is 25 years rather than lifetime.
When comparing value, the backup method matters. With Tangem, you are paying for multiple working cards upfront. With DCENT S, you get one working card and one recovery-only card. If you lose your primary DCENT S, you need to buy a replacement. If you lose a Tangem card, you already have another one in your set.
Tangem and DCENT S take different approaches to backup. Tangem focuses on immediate multi-card redundancy, while DCENT S separates daily use from recovery by pairing the main card with a dedicated R3covery card.
DCENT S vs Tangem: Pros & Cons
DCENT S Pros:
- Dedicated recovery card that cannot sign transactions
- Seedless setup available
- Full XRPL support with Trust Lines, dApps, and swaps
- Thinner card design at 0.76mm
- Limited lifetime warranty
- Korean hardware engineering with design and assembly in South Korea
DCENT S Cons:
- Fewer built-in app features compared to Tangem
- No third-party security audit published yet
Tangem Pros:
- Multiple identical cards included, immediate backup ready
- 25-year warranty
- Wider token support (14,000+)
- More mature app with built-in staking, swapping, and dApp connectivity
- Available in ring form factor
- Independent firmware audits by Kudelski and Riscure
Tangem Cons:
- Every backup card can sign transactions (higher risk if stolen)
- No dedicated recovery-only card option
- Slightly thicker than DCENT S
- Less emphasis on XRP-specific features
Which Wallet Should You Choose?
After spending time with both wallets and looking closely at what each one offers, I lean toward the DCENT S for most users. The deciding factor is the backup system.
Tangem gives you multiple identical cards that all work as primary wallets. This is convenient, no question about it. If you lose one card, you grab another from your set and keep going. But here is the catch – every single one of those cards can sign transactions. If someone steals one of your backup cards and figures out your PIN, they have full access to your funds. The redundancy is nice, but the security model is less segmented.
DCENT S takes a different approach that I find more thoughtful. The R3covery Card cannot sign transactions. Its only purpose is to restore your wallet. This means even if someone gets hold of your backup card, they cannot move a single coin without also having your primary card and PIN. That separation between daily use and emergency recovery is a smarter security design. You store the two cards in different places, and you have built-in protection against a single point of failure.
The XRP support on DCENT S is another strong reason to choose it. Full XRPL functionality with Trust Lines, decentralized applications, and swaps makes it the obvious choice if you hold XRP or interact with the XRP Ledger. Tangem also supports XRP, but DCENT S places more emphasis on XRP-oriented workflows and recovery-focused positioning.
There is also something to be said for a company that has been building hardware wallets since 2017 and serves users across 220 countries. IOTRUST has engineering experience that predates many of their competitors. The DCENT S is designed and assembled in South Korea, which speaks to the quality control and manufacturing standards you get with the product.
At the end of the day, both wallets represent a major step forward in making self-custody accessible. But the DCENT S offers a more secure backup architecture, better XRP support, and the peace of mind that comes from knowing your recovery card cannot be used against you. That is why I would choose it over Tangem.
The post DCENT S Wallet vs Tangem: Full Comparison of Design, Security, Supported Coins, and Mobile App appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Former Coinbase CTO Loses Malaysia License After Alleged Israel Link Sparks Investigation
Malaysian authorities have revoked the business license of Network School, a technology community founded by former Coinbase CTO Balaji Srinivasan.
The decision followed scrutiny over alleged links to Israeli participants. However, local officials said they cancelled the license over business and premises violations.
The Iskandar Puteri City Council ordered NS0 Malaysia Sdn Bhd to stop all operations at Forest City from July 22. Officials said the company operated from two premises. One site did not have the required business license.
Meanwhile, inspectors found that the company carried out activities beyond those approved under its existing license. Authorities also found problems with its advertising signboard.
Israeli Claims Trigger Investigation
The case began after pro-Palestinian activists raised concerns about possible Israeli participation at Network School.
Online posts alleged that Israeli entrepreneurs had entered Malaysia using passports issued by other countries. The claims also raised questions about the school’s admission process and its interest in Israel, politics and military technology.
However, Malaysian immigration officials later inspected 266 foreign residents from 40 countries.
They said everyone checked had valid travel documents. Authorities did not publicly confirm that any participant had entered Malaysia illegally as an Israeli national.
Malaysia does not recognise Israel and generally does not allow entry using Israeli passports. However, Israeli dual nationals may enter using valid passports from other countries if they meet Malaysian immigration rules.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said authorities would expel any Israeli national found breaking local laws.
What is the Network School?
Network School opened in Forest City, Johor, in 2024.
Despite its name, Malaysia’s Higher Education Ministry said it was not a registered university or private education provider. Officials described it as a residential and co-working community for technology founders, investors and startup workers.
The project became known for promoting Srinivasan’s “network state” idea. The concept involves online communities building physical settlements and developing their own economic and governance systems.
The school offered accommodation, meals, workspaces, startup programmes and fitness activities. It attracted people from the crypto, technology and investment sectors.
Srinivasan Rejects Allegations
Srinivasan denied the claims about Israeli links before the license was cancelled.
He said anonymous social media accounts had spread false allegations. He also warned that the investigation could damage Malaysia’s reputation among international technology investors.
According to Srinivasan, Network School had invested more than 100 million Malaysian ringgit in Forest City. He said the company had planned a further 500 million ringgit expansion.
The company placed those plans on hold during the investigation.
Srinivasan joined Coinbase in 2018 after the crypto exchange acquired Earn.com, where he served as chief executive.
Coinbase appointed him as its first CTO. His role focused on technology strategy, crypto advocacy and recruitment. He left the company in May 2019.
Malaysia and Israel’s Diplomatic Roadblocks
Malaysia has a long-standing policy of refusing formal diplomatic relations with Israel and strongly supporting Palestinian statehood. Israeli passport holders are generally barred from entering without special permission, and Malaysian passports have historically excluded travel to Israel.
The Gaza war intensified public pressure for boycotts and restrictions involving Israeli entities or companies accused of supporting Israel.
In 2024, 22 Malaysian civil-society organisations urged the government to block a consortium’s proposed privatisation of Malaysia Airports because one consortium member, Global Infrastructure Partners, was being acquired by BlackRock.
Campaigners alleged that BlackRock had significant Israeli connections and investments.
The government did not cancel the airport transaction solely on that basis. Global Infrastructure Partners later said BlackRock would not participate in the deal.
The post Former Coinbase CTO Loses Malaysia License After Alleged Israel Link Sparks Investigation appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
AI-Driven Trading Slows, Analysts See Crypto Breakout Momentum
Bitcoin and the wider crypto market started Tuesday on a firmer footing as expectations for US regulatory progress reignited risk appetite, lifting both digital assets and shares tied to crypto activity.
Bitcoin briefly pushed above $67,000 and Ether neared $1,950, while crypto-related equities rose sharply. Coinbase stock climbed about 12%, American Bitcoin gained roughly 14%, and Cipher Digital jumped around 17%.
Key takeaways
- Shares and tokens rallied after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said lawmakers are approaching a key vote on the CLARITY Act.
- The proposed law would clarify which regulator—SEC or CFTC—oversees different categories of digital assets.
- Analysts also cited weakening momentum in AI-linked equities as a potential driver of capital rotation back into crypto.
- The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index’s pullback suggests speculation in AI infrastructure may be cooling after a strong run.
Regulatory optimism lifts the whole complex
The immediate catalyst for Tuesday’s rebound came from remarks by Scott Bessent, reported by Bloomberg, indicating that lawmakers were at the “1-yard line” on the long-debated CLARITY Act. The bill aims to define the regulatory roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for digital assets.
For investors, that kind of clarity matters because it can reduce uncertainty around enforcement risk and the classification of tokens and trading venues. It also has second-order effects: when regulators’ boundaries look more clearly drawn, capital formation—whether in exchanges, custody, or institutional products—tends to improve as participants better price compliance and operational costs.
Crypto’s rebound runs alongside stock strength
Market-wide optimism showed up most visibly in equities connected to the crypto ecosystem. Coinbase’s stock led gains among major crypto market proxies, while companies exposed to mining, trading, or related infrastructure also outperformed.
That strong correlation between crypto prices and crypto-linked equities often reflects a common driver: when policy expectations shift, both asset holders and equity investors adjust their assumptions about future regulation, adoption, and market structure.
Rotation risk: why AI-linked stocks may be losing steam
Beyond US legislative headlines, some analysts pointed to a separate potential driver—investors dialing back exposure to AI-linked equities—which could free up liquidity for other high-beta trades, including digital assets.
Bloomberg quoted FRNT Financial CEO Stephane Ouellette arguing that when Bitcoin is near the upper end of its range, the “path of least resistance” can turn upward. Ouellette also said the likelihood of a breakout may increase if the AI trade slows and investors become more comfortable with the broader interest-rate outlook.
The “AI trade” explanation has a concrete benchmark behind it. According to coverage cited by the article, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX)—a widely watched measure for chipmakers tied to AI demand—surged roughly 110% over the past year. But momentum has started to slip: the SOX entered a technical bear market last week after falling more than 20% from its recent high, with investors reportedly increasingly worried about lofty valuations and the risk of overcapacity in AI infrastructure spending.
That matters because much of the speculative appetite in financial markets has been concentrated in AI during the last year. Since the public launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, the mix of rapid innovation, venture capital activity, and retail enthusiasm helped shift attention away from crypto and toward AI narratives across trading desks and risk budgets.
What to watch next
Tuesday’s bounce looks tied to two threads: near-term expectations for the CLARITY Act’s progress in Washington and signs that AI-linked equity momentum may be cooling. The next signal for traders and longer-term investors will be whether crypto price strength holds through subsequent US legislative developments—and whether the broader market continues to rotate attention from semiconductors back toward risk assets like digital currencies.
Crypto World
White House pushes Senate Democrats to take ‘historic’ crypto Clarity Act ethics deal
“If Senate Democrats block this historic legislation after the administration has bent over backward to accommodate their concerns, stakeholders should make no mistake: It is the Democrats who are blocking this legislation because they were never serious about a legislative outcome,” the White House official said.
Democratic negotiators such as Senators Kirsten Gillibrand, Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks reportedly haven’t received details of the agreement with Trump, who’d met personally with Republican senators last week. But many of the Democrats have drawn a line in the sand that the ethics provision — driven primarily by Trump’s own deep crypto connections — needs to be strong.
The dispute was heightened recently by the president’s disclosures that he’d pocketed more than $1 billion last year from his crypto interests.
The White House, Republicans and their crypto industry allies are already building their case against any Democrats who don’t accept the new answer to their ethics demands. It’s unclear when they’ll get to see it.
The industry is expecting full circulation of the Clarity Act legislative language as soon as Tuesday night or Wednesday, though that expectation has been repeatedly delayed since last week.
The Senate has fewer than three weeks to finish the bill, including the ethics piece, and get it through the political gauntlet of a floor vote before lawmakers leave town for their reelection campaigns. There’s technically enough time, but even without significant further debate, it would be tight.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Just Triggered Three Rare Signals That Previously Marked Market Bottoms
Bitcoin is displaying the same technical conditions that have historically marked major market bottoms, even as some on-chain indicators continue to point to the possibility of further downside.
In his latest analysis, crypto analyst Ali Martinez said that metrics such as MVRV and Cumulative Value-Days Destroyed (CVDD) still place BTC’s potential cycle bottom in the $40,000 to $50,000 range. However, the crypto asset’s monthly chart is now showing a technical setup that has consistently appeared near the end of previous bear markets.
Rare Technical Trifecta Returns
According to Martinez, this pattern consists of three important signals occurring together: the monthly Relative Strength Index (RSI) falling to around 43.65, the Chande Momentum Oscillator (CMO) dropping to roughly -71, and Bitcoin testing its 50-month moving average.
In the three previous market cycles, this combination coincided with major long-term bottoms. For example, back in March 2015, the setup appeared when BTC traded at $235. Although the price later briefly declined to $162, Martinez said the signal preceded an 8,300% macro expansion.
A similar pattern emerged in January 2019, when the crypto asset was near $3,333, slightly above the cycle low of $3,124 recorded a month earlier, before beginning a rally of 1,911%. The same technical cluster also appeared in December 2022, when it stood at $16,270, just above the $15,473 cycle bottom while hovering near the 50-month moving average. The analyst said that move was followed by a 675% rally.
Interestingly, Bitcoin’s correction to $58,000 last month triggered the same historical setup once again.
According to the analysis, the monthly RSI has now fallen below 43.65, the Chande Momentum Oscillator has cooled to -71, and Bitcoin is trading around its 50-month moving average. While Martinez acknowledged that on-chain indicators still leave room for the crypto asset to revisit the $40,000 to $50,000 range in what he described as a “sweep of the CVDD floor,” he said the current technical alignment has represented a dominant accumulation zone.
Based on that combination of signals, Martinez stated,
“Shifting focus away from short positions and toward spot BTC accumulation offers a highly favorable risk-to-reward ratio at these levels.”
Buying Opportunity
Martinez is not alone in seeing the current market as a buying opportunity. Crypto analyst Doctor Profit also recently noted that investors waiting for a traditional four-year cycle bottom in September or October could miss the opportunity. While he acknowledged that a large liquidity zone remains around $54,000 and said Bitcoin could still decline about 15% from current levels, he does not expect the crypto asset to fall below $50,000.
Instead of waiting for lower prices, Doctor Profit suggested accumulating Bitcoin gradually rather than investing all at once. He also said the next major rally is unlikely to begin immediately. The analyst said several upcoming events could strengthen market sentiment before the asset reaches its expected cycle low.
These include the planned rollout of tokenized stocks involving BlackRock, the New York Stock Exchange, the S&P, Nasdaq, and the DTCC. He also mentioned speculation surrounding the CLARITY Act’s possible passage in August.
The post Bitcoin Just Triggered Three Rare Signals That Previously Marked Market Bottoms appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Xrp Ledger V3.2.0 Hits 66% Adoption Before July 29 Activation
XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 now runs on 66% of tracked validators as the network approaches a scheduled amendment activation. XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 has reached 99 validators and 481 nodes across the monitored network. The July 29 activation remains on schedule because validator support continues above the required threshold.
Validator Adoption Expands Across The Network
XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 currently operates on 57.33% of tracked nodes, according to recent XRPL Explorer data. The tracker recorded 481 updated nodes among 825 observed systems. Adoption has increased since the software became available in June.
However, many operators still use the earlier release across both validator and node infrastructure. Version 3.1.3 remains active on 42 validators, representing 28% of the monitored validator group. Another 323 nodes continue running that version, equal to 38.41% of tracked nodes.
XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 gives operators access to maintenance fixes before the amendment changes ledger rules. Software installation and amendment approval remain separate processes under XRP Ledger governance. Updated servers receive the code, while validator votes determine whether consensus changes become binding.
Amendment Support Clears The Required Threshold
The fixCleanup3_2_0 amendment currently holds 85.71% validator support ahead of its planned activation. Thirty validators support the proposal, while five validators oppose it. The approval level exceeds the network’s required 80% threshold.
XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 supports the amendment, but approval must remain above 80% during the full waiting period. XRP Ledger rules require that level for two consecutive weeks. A decline below the threshold would restart the countdown.
The network has scheduled activation for July 29, 2026, at 09:57 UTC. XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 must remain available across participating infrastructure when the new rules take effect. Unsupported servers may become amendment-blocked and lose the ability to confirm the ledger’s valid state.
Update Addresses Existing Protocol Issues
XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 fixes problems affecting vaults, lending functions, permissioned trading, and related domain features. The release addresses calculations involving Single Asset Vault deposits and issued shares. It also corrects accounting behavior within the Lending Protocol.
The update includes repairs for the Permissioned DEX, Multi-Purpose Tokens, and Permissioned Domains. XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 applies maintenance changes to features already introduced through earlier amendments. The package does not center on new consumer-facing products.
The development team also renamed the main server software from rippled to xrpld. XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 retires amendments that have remained active for more than two years. Developers also continued dividing libxrpl into smaller modules for simpler maintenance and future development.
XRP Ledger’s v3.2.0 remains on course for the July 29 amendment activation after reaching 66% validator adoption. Validator support remains above the required level, while operators using older software still face an update deadline.
Crypto World
Only 8 Altcoins Launched Since 2024 are Profitable
Almost every big altcoin launched since 2024 has lost money for launch-day buyers. CryptoRank data from July 21 shows just 8 of 113 still trade above their token generation event (TGE) price.
The count covers only tokens with market caps above $100 million today. Even in that select group, the median return since launch stands at -95.7%.
Why Most Altcoins Launched Since 2024 Fell Below TGE Price
The report builds on a warning from December. Back then, research firm Memento Research found 84.7% of 2025 launches, 100 of 118 tokens, below their listing price. Median project valuations in that analysis had collapsed 71% from launch.
The market has not helped since. CryptoRank’s second-quarter recap shows 82.1% of the top 100 assets fell in June. Every major token category it tracks also posted median losses.
The numbers hide an even darker picture. The list counts only tokens still worth over $100 million. Thousands of smaller launches failed and never made the cut.
So why do new tokens keep sinking? Two reasons stand out. Many launched at inflated prices, and scheduled token unlocks then kept adding supply that buyers did not want.
Worldcoin (WLD) shows how far the fall can go. One of 2024’s most hyped launches now sits down 97% from peak, even with a Grayscale ETF filing pending.
Hyperliquid Leads the Few Survivors Still in Profit
Hyperliquid (HYPE) tops the winners with a 1,519% gain since its November 2024 airdrop. The token now trades near $61.52 with a $13.7 billion market cap. That makes it the tenth-largest cryptocurrency.
HYPE’s edge is simple. Its perpetuals exchange earns real fees, and that revenue funds token buybacks. Spot HYPE ETFs also began trading in May. Still, the token sits about 20% below its June record of $76.70.
Ondo (ONDO) comes second at 101.4% above its launch price, lifted by demand for tokenized US Treasuries. Yet ONDO remains 81% below its December 2024 peak of $2.14. Being in profit can still hide a deep crash.
EverValue Coin (EVA), an Arbitrum token with growing Bitcoin backing, gained 20.3%. Midnight Network (NIGHT), a privacy chain tied to Cardano, added 16.5%. CryptoRank did not name the other four winners.
The lesson is blunt. Hype fades, but unlock schedules do not. The few survivors earn fees, solve real problems, or hold hard assets. The next wave of launches will show whether anyone was paying attention.
The post Only 8 Altcoins Launched Since 2024 are Profitable appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Movement Labs files for Chapter 11 months after token scandal and strategic overhaul
The controversy centered on Rentech, a little-known intermediary that appeared in contracts connected to Chinese market maker Web3Port. According to documents obtained by CoinDesk, Movement executives later questioned whether the foundation believed Rentech was affiliated with Web3Port when it was not. Rentech has denied any wrongdoing or misrepresentation.
The fallout extended beyond Movement. Binance banned the market-making account involved in the token launch for what it described as misconduct, while Movement launched a token buyback program and hired outside firm Groom Lake to review the events surrounding the deal.
Movement Labs and co-founder Rushi Manche separated in May 2025.
More recently, the company attempted to chart a new course.
In June, Movement announced it would pivot away from competing with other Ethereum scaling networks and instead focus on cross-border payments, remittances and stablecoin settlement. The company said it had secured access to licensed payment infrastructure in the U.S., Canada and the European Union as it sought to build services aimed at emerging markets.
The strategy reflected a wider trend across the crowded layer-2 sector, where blockchain projects have increasingly shifted toward real-world financial applications as competition among scaling networks has intensified.
It remains unclear how the Chapter 11 filing will affect Movement’s blockchain network, its partnerships or plans to expand its payments business. Chapter 11 bankruptcy allows companies to continue operating while restructuring their debts under court supervision.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Price Analysis: Is $70K Next After BTC Broke Above $66K?
Bitcoin is attempting to extend its recovery after rebounding sharply from the June lows. The asset is now pressing into an important confluence of resistance, where a descending trendline aligns with a major supply zone.
While buyers have regained short-term momentum, the coming sessions will determine whether this move develops into a broader trend reversal or another lower high within the prevailing structure.
Bitcoin Price Analysis: The Daily Chart
On the daily timeframe, BTC continues to trade below its long-term moving averages, with the 100-day MA positioned around the $70K region and the 200-day MA closer to $73K. Both averages remain downward sloping, indicating that the broader market structure still favors sellers despite the recent recovery.
Following the sharp decline toward the $57K to $60K support area, Bitcoin established a sequence of higher lows inside a narrowing descending channel. The recent rally has carried the price toward the upper boundary of this formation, which coincides with the $66K to $67K resistance zone.
A decisive breakout above both the descending trendline and the $66K to $67K supply area would represent the first meaningful structural improvement since the correction began. Such a move could expose the next resistance level around $74K, where the 200-day moving average and another major supply zone converge.
However, rejection from current levels would reinforce the descending structure and could trigger another pullback toward the $60K support region. Below that, the major demand zone around $55K remains the most important higher timeframe support visible on the chart.
BTC/USDT 4-Hour Chart
The 4-hour chart presents a more constructive picture. Bitcoin has been respecting a well-defined descending channel since early June, but recent price action shows buyers steadily reclaiming higher support levels after defending the channel’s lower boundary around $58K.
The market has already broken above several intermediate resistance zones at roughly $58K and $61K before advancing toward the current resistance cluster around $66K. This area also aligns with the channel’s upper trendline, making it the key short-term battleground.
Unlike previous tests, the latest advance has been accompanied by stronger momentum, with RSI pushing toward the overbought territory near 70. This reflects increasing buying pressure but also raises the possibility of a short-term pause or local pullback if profit-taking emerges at resistance.
If the breakout above the channel holds, it could invalidate the current bearish corrective structure and pave the way for an advance toward the next higher timeframe resistance around $72K to $74K.
Conversely, failure to overcome this ceiling would likely keep Bitcoin oscillating inside the channel, with initial support located near $61K followed by the stronger demand region around $58K.
On-Chain Analysis
The Bitcoin Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) metric currently sits around 0.18, well below the euphoric levels observed during previous market peaks.
NUPL measures the aggregate unrealized profits and losses across the network. Elevated readings generally indicate widespread investor optimism and increasing profit-taking risk, while lower values suggest that market participants are holding significantly smaller unrealized gains.
The recent recovery in NUPL from deeply depressed levels indicates that profitability across the network is gradually improving alongside price. However, the indicator remains firmly within the lower sentiment bands and is still far from the overheated conditions that historically accompanied cycle tops.
This suggests that, from an on-chain perspective, the market has not yet entered an excessive profit-taking phase. If Bitcoin manages to break above its current technical resistance, continued improvement in NUPL would likely support a healthier and more sustainable recovery. On the other hand, a rejection at current levels could temporarily stall the metric’s recovery without necessarily invalidating the broader rebuilding process.
The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: Is $70K Next After BTC Broke Above $66K? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
White House Agrees to Ethics Provisions in Market Structure Bill
The White House agreed to provisions in a crypto market structure bill that could ensure support from some Democratic lawmakers in the US Senate.
According to a Tuesday Punchbowl report, White House officials met with Republican Senators Cynthia Lummis and Bernie Moreno to reach an agreement on ethics language in the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act under consideration in the Senate.
Neither Lummis nor Moreno have publicly announced the details of the deal, which could facilitate Democratic support in what is expected to be a tight Senate vote, but the report suggested that it could affect US President Donald Trump’s crypto investments.

Event contract on chances of CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026.
Source: Polymarket
The CLARITY Act, passed by the House of Representatives in July 2025 as part of Republicans’ “Crypto Week” agenda, has faced several delays in Congress due to government shutdowns, concerns from lawmakers over ethics, tokenization and stablecoin rewards and provisions for protecting developers from enforcement actions. Many lawmakers and industry advocates expect the Senate to consider the bill before the chamber breaks for August state work periods, but as of Tuesday, no vote appeared on the congressional calendar and the text of the bill had not been made public.
No certainty for 60-vote threshold
Last week, Trump urged the Senate to pass CLARITY “in honor of” the late Senator Lindsey Graham, whom the president said was “a big supporter” of the bill. Many crypto industry executives and lawmakers have publicly come out in support of the bill, but it’s unclear whether the legislation will pass the 60-vote threshold in the Senate, due to many Democrats’ concerns about potential conflicts of interest with the Trump administration.
Related: Ethics remain sticking point as crypto market structure bill goes to markup
Several Senate Democrats, including Elizabeth Warren, Chris Murphy, Jeff Merkley and Chris Van Hollen said that any CLARITY bill would be “worthless” without ethics provisions to address Trump’s ties to the crypto industry, including his memecoin and his family’s World Liberty Financial business. Cointelegraph requested details on the agreement from Lummis’ office but did not receive an immediate response.
A White House official told Cointelegraph that the administration was “committed to working with Congress to see the CLARITY Act advance and has agreed to the most comprehensive and wide-ranging ethics provision in history,“ adding that it had “bent over backward to accommodate [Democrats’] concerns.“
According to Coinbase vice chair Ryan VanGrack, Democrats have already been able to negotiate to include provisions on customer protection in the Senate bill. However, many lawmakers are calling for hearings to explore Trump’s investments and links to the industry before any potential vote.
Bitcoin price climbs amid CLARITY talks
The price of Bitcoin (BTC) rose above $66,000 early on Tuesday, reaching a seven-week high amid reports of an ethics deal and Trump’s plans to introduce additional 10% international trade tariffs.
“The reason that prices are running upwards are entirely dedicated towards the potential approval of the Clarity Act,“ said Michaël van de Poppe, founder and chief investment officer of MN Fund and MN Capital, in a Tuesday X post. “Things are brighter and brighter, and as the charts technically look incredible from here, it looks likely that we’ll see the Clarity Act being approved shortly.“
Magazine: Will the crypto lobby’s $189M campaign get CLARITY over the line?
Crypto World
AI firm ORO says North Korean hacker stole $600K worth of crypto
AI shopping agent developer ORO has revealed that it lost $630,000 worth of crypto when a suspected North Korean state hacker, posing as a conference contact, tricked a staff member into installing a malicious Microsoft Teams extension.
According to a post-mortem released by ORO, one of its team members met a contact at an industry conference in February 2025 and formed a “legitimate relationship” that involved communicating on Telegram.
Almost a year later in May 2026, the Telegram account belonging to this genuine contact reached out to schedule a catch-up call.
However, when the ORO staff member joined the call via a link that mimicked Microsoft Teams, there was no working audio, and so the pair rescheduled for another day.
Almost immediately, the team member’s computer prompted them to update Microsoft Teams, and, thinking nothing of it, they okayed the procedure.
Read more: MetaMask hired suspected North Korean dev flagged months earlier
However, the seemingly innocent update allowed a malicious extension to be installed onto their computer. This extension tracked their keyboard inputs, clipboard history, took screenshots of the computer’s page and browser history, and could swap out crypto addresses.
The attacker spent almost a month quietly collecting data before, on July 13, they drained ORO’s crypto wallets of 147,000 Alpha tokens.
ORO believes attack came from North Korea
ORO maintains that the contact at the conference was “legitimate,” and that their Telegram account had become compromised.
As for who the attacker is, ORO claims with “high confidence,” based on its macOS intrusion, that it’s a North Korean hacker from the state-backed group Sapphire Sleet.
It said, “The IP address that our compromised machine was beaconing to, the matching payload and some overlapping infrastructure outlined in the above post from Microsoft makes us confident that the attack came from this group.”
Indeed, Microsoft’s Threat Intelligence department highlights how Sapphire Sleet uses Teams-themed cover, social engineering, and focuses on macOS.
“By impersonating a legitimate software update, threat actors tricked users into manually running malicious files, allowing them to steal passwords, cryptocurrency assets, and personal data while avoiding built‑in macOS security checks,” it said.
ORO claims it’s partly responsible for $600K hack
Despite the hacker’s actions, ORO also partly admitted responsibility for causing the hack.
It claims that a lack of widespread support for hardware wallets in decentralised protocol Bittensor meant that the firm, going against its preference for hardware wallets, “temporarily” established the owner key as a software wallet.
It said, “This is what allowed it to be exfiltrated from a compromised machine. That was inexcusable, and it was our mistake. We are sorry for the impact this has had on our community and our supporters.”
ORO claims it’s actively pursuing the recovery of the stolen assets with the help of cryptocurrency exchanges and law enforcement, as well as Bittsensor agent firm Opentensor, Bittsensor wallet firm Curciible Labs, and Bittsensor AI infrastructure firm Connito AI.
The company also stressed that its subnet is “fully operational,” no other wallets, user, or subnet data was affected, and that validator signing keys on hardware wallets “were never exposed.”
Read more: Solana DEX Stabble urges liquidity exit after alleged DPRK mole revealed
A number of North Korea-related crypto attacks have been uncovered in recent months.
In April, a North Korean mole known as “Moo” was exposed by crypto sleuth ZachXBT and subsequently fired from Solana-based DEX Stabble.
This month, the crypto wallet firm MetaMask was revealed to have employed a North Korean mole as a developer for at least a month.
According to a DeFi security analyst, the developer’s links to Lazarus Group, another North Korea-based hacking group, were publicly available for almost a year.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
-
NewsBeat5 days agoLondon Mayor Sadiq Khan handed a peerage by Keir Starmer alongside 15 other Labour figures… just days before the PM leaves No10
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Politics3 days agoThe House | The City of London can help the new chancellor deliver growth in every postcode
-
Politics6 days agoYoung campaigners urge incoming PM to act on outdoor junk food ads
-
Crypto World6 days agoCFTC blocks Kalshi from unwinding Michigan trades after court order
-
Crypto World4 days agoTwo July Windows Left: The CLARITY Act’s Senate Fight and What Failure Means
-
Crypto World3 days agoRipple Payments Joins MiCA With 14 Firms, Does It Mean Anything For XRP?
-
Business6 days agoNvidia Stock Slips After Big Tuesday Rally as Huang Confirms Vera Rubin Chip Is Now in Production Today
-
Politics2 days agoDemocrats look to World Cup watch parties to register thousands of voters
-
Entertainment6 days agoDisney’s Most Ambitious Failed Star Wars Attraction Is Coming to SDCC
-
Crypto World4 days agoRipple wins EU-wide access as ESMA adds it to MiCA register
-
Crypto World10 hours agoGrayscale Files For Worldcoin ETF, WLD Registers Sharp Rise
-
Crypto World5 days agoInjective Submits SEC Transfer-Agent Registration to Onchain Ownership Records
-
Business6 days agoPalantir Shares Rise After Expanded Nvidia Partnership and Fresh Analyst Upgrades Ahead of Earnings Day
-
Tech18 hours agoSail Virtually Aboard The “Itanic” With IA-64 Emulator
-
Tech15 hours ago
Turtle Beach Command Series KB7 review: a nifty screen-equipped gaming keyboard
-
Tech7 days agoDark Secrets Emerge When Jailbreaking LLMs
-
NewsBeat4 days agoRegistration is now open for March for Men with Kev 2026
-
News Videos7 days agoXRP BOMBSHELL… XRP OMBOARDED FOR TRANSACTIONS!!!
-
NewsBeat1 day agoUnregistered fitter used Gas Safe logo on business flyers




You must be logged in to post a comment Login