Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Digital Assets & TradFi Convergence

Published

on

Digital Assets & TradFi Convergence

From 2023 to 2026, from Hong Kong to a global stage, institutions from around the world convened once again. As the next decade of digital assets unfolds, LTP looks ahead alongside the industry.

What does it feel like to observe—at close range—the front-line pulse of digital assets and traditional finance (TradFi) amid market volatility?

On Feb. 9, 2026, Liquidity 2026, the annual flagship institutional digital asset summit hosted by LTP Hong Kong, concluded successfully in Hong Kong. Now in its fourth consecutive year, the event once again brought together senior representatives from hedge funds, market makers, high-frequency trading firms, family offices, asset managers, exchanges, custodians, banks, and technology service providers, marking another milestone in the accelerating convergence of digital assets and traditional financial markets.

Throughout the full-day agenda, the summit featured keynote addresses, fireside chats, and in-depth roundtable discussions. Speakers and participants engaged in rigorous exchanges around the evolution of the global financial system, the rise of tokenization, and the rapid integration of multi-asset ecosystems—exploring what new opportunities and new paradigms may emerge as institutional adoption deepens.

Advertisement

As the summit drew to a close, a clear consensus emerged across diverse perspectives: at a turning point in the reshaping of the global financial landscape, infrastructure development, regulatory dialogue, and cross-institutional collaboration will be the critical variables shaping the industry’s sustainable growth.This was not merely a forum for ideas, but a defining step in the digital asset industry’s progression toward standardization, institutionalization, and mainstream relevance.

Full Agenda Highlights and Key Takeaways

At Liquidity 2026, LTP convened global experts to examine the future of institutional digital asset markets through multiple lenses—including core infrastructure, liquidity connectivity, tokenization, and emerging market paradigms.

Multi-Asset Trading and Market Convergence: Compatibility and Resilience

Participants broadly agreed that crypto assets are increasingly being redefined as a core asset class that must be integrated into institutional portfolio management frameworks, rather than treated as a standalone alternative market. Stephan Lutz, CEO of BitMEX, noted that CIOs can no longer afford to ignore this asset class. As institutions formally incorporate digital assets into allocation frameworks, the design logic of trading systems is shifting—from pursuing peak performance to enabling seamless integration within existing governance structures, API architectures, and risk controls.

System resilience was repeatedly emphasized. Tom Higgins, Founder and CEO of Gold-i, remarked during a roundtable that system design must assume failure as inevitable, with redundancy and survivability achieved through multi-venue aggregation. At a macro level, regulatory fragmentation remains a key obstacle to global market interoperability; without cross-jurisdictional alignment, genuine multi-asset convergence will remain constrained.

The New Settlement Layer: Clearing, Custody, and Interoperability

Discussions around settlement and custody pointed to a clear direction: custodians are evolving from passive asset safekeeping toward becoming a core infrastructure layer supporting clearing, settlement, and risk management. As institutional participation grows, custody is no longer viewed solely as a compliance requirement, but as a critical nexus connecting regulatory certainty with operational scalability.

Advertisement

The definition of trust is also evolving. Ian Loh, CEO of Ceffu, emphasized that trust must be embedded in executable on-chain mechanisms, with assets generating tangible yield through collaboration between custodians and prime brokers. The importance of mature third-party technology has become increasingly evident. Amy Zhang, Head of APAC at Fireblocks, highlighted the industry’s growing reliance on established infrastructure providers, noting that Europe is emerging as a strategic hub for institutional digital assets due to its regulatory clarity and infrastructure maturity.

Technological redundancy was widely seen as essential to mitigating systemic disruptions. As Darren Jordan, Chief Commercial Officer at Komainu, observed, the future of custody lies in asset usability—shifting the core question from whether assets are safely stored to whether they can be securely and reliably mobilized.

Rebuilding Infrastructure and the Price of Data

Johann Kerbrat, SVP and GM of Robinhood Crypto, shared how Robinhood is evolving from a crypto trading platform into a general-purpose financial infrastructure provider, leveraging blockchain to re-architect payments, settlement, and traditional asset trading—while abstracting complexity away from the end user.

In his view, TradFi’s core bottleneck remains settlement efficiency, often operating at T+1 or longer, whereas crypto-native systems offer 24/7 availability, near-instant transfers, and composability that materially reduce capital costs and counterparty risk. Within regulatory frameworks, Robinhood is advancing equity tokenization on a fully collateralized, 1:1 basis, anticipating that tokenization will expand beyond stablecoins into equities, ETFs, and private markets. The central challenge, he argued, lies not in technology, but in regulatory implementation and collective adoption.

Advertisement

Cory Loo, Head of APAC at Pyth Network, described market data as a structurally underappreciated industry—generating over $50 billion in annual revenue, with data costs rising more than 15-fold over the past 25 years. The true cost, he noted, stems not from information asymmetry, but from data quality, which ultimately determines whether traders achieve best execution.

Pyth Network aims to reconstruct traditional data pipelines by bringing price inputs directly from trading firms and exchanges into a shared price layer, which is then redistributed to institutions at higher quality and lower cost with millisecond-level multi-asset updates. Loo disclosed that Pyth Pro attracted over 80 subscribers within two months of launch, achieving more than $1 million in ARR in its first month. The project also plans to implement a value-capture mechanism whereby subscription revenue flows into a DAO, which repurchases tokens and builds long-term reserves.

Institutional Capital Allocation: From Speculation to Systematic Exposure

A notable shift in capital allocation is underway. Institutional capital is rotating away from narrative-driven assets toward instruments with clear demand drivers and regulatory visibility. Fabian Dori, CIO of Sygnum, observed that as metaverse narratives faded, institutions have refocused on leveraging smart contracts for value-chain integration and process automation. Risk management has increasingly displaced return speculation as the primary screening criterion.

Tokenization is widely expected to drive structural, rather than incremental, change—but scale will depend on demonstrable client demand rather than technological capability alone. Interest in index-based and structured products is rising, and Giovanni Vicioso, Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products at CME Group, noted that the future market landscape will likely be defined by the coexistence of multiple technologies and market structures.

Advertisement

Trading Convergence: Bridging Liquidity, Pricing, and Risk

In discussions on liquidity and risk management, participants focused on system stability during extreme market conditions. Jeremi Long, CIO of Ludisia, highlighted how infrastructure upgrades have materially improved execution quality, while emphasizing that risk management must be designed for worst-case scenarios.

Improving cross-venue capital efficiency was identified as a key solution to fragmented capital deployment. Collaborative models between exchanges and custodians—enabling shared capital pools—are increasingly being explored. In this context, transparency has become paramount. Giuseppe Giuliani, Vice President of Kraken’s Institutional team, stressed that liquidity depends on risks being clearly priced, and that exchange transparency and operational stability directly influence market-maker participation.

Building Institutional Rails for the Digital Asset Economy

At the institutional and infrastructure level, multiple case studies suggest a shift from proof-of-concept to real-world deployment. Stablecoin pilots in insurance and payments demonstrate the tangible efficiency gains of on-chain settlement. Some institutions are now exploring migrating flagship products directly on-chain to access broader global liquidity.

System stability is increasingly viewed as a form of revenue protection. Zeng Xin, Senior Web3 Solutions Architect at AWS, noted that stability functions as “income insurance,” with cloud infrastructure providing the resilience and elasticity required for digital markets. Meanwhile, traditional regulatory frameworks continue to impose structural constraints on capital allocation.

Sherry Zhu, Global Head of Digital Assets at Futu Holdings Limited for Futu Group, emphasized that trust and convenience represent core opportunities for brokerage platforms, while acknowledging the capital constraints imposed by frameworks such as Basel. Balancing compliance, privacy, and custody remains a critical threshold for institutional participation in DeFi.

Advertisement

Everything as Collateral: RWA, Stablecoins, and Tokenized Credit

Debates around whether tokenized assets can serve as core collateral are moving from theory to practice. Compared with traditional structures, on-chain collateral—enabled by 24/7 settlement—is better suited to meet sudden margin requirements in derivatives markets. However, legal clarity remains the determining factor.

Chetan Karkhanis, SVP at Franklin Templeton, emphasized the importance of choosing natively on-chain asset structures rather than digital replicas, ensuring a single source of legal truth. Regulatory classification and its impact on capital requirements are equally critical. Institutions evaluating tokenized collateral tend to focus on four dimensions: legal ownership, operational risk, custody arrangements, and liquidity depth.

Beyond the Hype: Where the Industry Goes Next

As the summit concluded, participants converged on a shared view: tokenization alone does not constitute a competitive advantage. The true differentiator lies in whether it delivers measurable improvements across reserves, trading, or settlement.

Erkan Kaya, CEO of ABEX, suggested that tokenization has the potential to fully absorb traditional finance into crypto-native systems, with a tipping point likely to emerge over the next decade. As regulatory credentials, system stability, and user experience become decisive factors, the evolution of financial infrastructure appears irreversible. Digital assets are no longer a peripheral complement to TradFi, but a force increasingly capable of reshaping its operating logic and power structures.Moses Lee, Head of APAC at Anchorage Digital, summarized the sentiment succinctly: tokenization does not equal success—its value depends on delivering clear functional advantages in reserves, trading, or settlement.

Advertisement

Closing Thoughts

For LTP, the industry’s transition into a more mature phase—marked by the fading of hype—also represents the optimal moment for infrastructure, compliance, and sustainable innovation to take root. We remain firmly convinced that lasting value creation resides in the foundational systems that quietly support market operations.

From 2023 to 2026, from regional markets to a global perspective, LTP has remained committed to observing, documenting, and actively participating in the structural, institutional, and regulatory evolution of the digital asset industry. The successful conclusion of Liquidity 2026 marks another meaningful milestone in our long-term effort to advance the integration of digital assets and TradFi.

Looking ahead, LTP will continue to invest heavily in ecosystem development—championing more resilient infrastructure and more open collaboration—to help shape the next decade of digital assets.

With infrastructure build-out, regulatory engagement, and cross-institutional collaboration converging, a healthier, more professional, and increasingly mainstream digital asset era is taking shape.

Advertisement

While Liquidity 2026 has just concluded, the marathon toward deep digital asset–TradFi integration is only entering its second half. As a long-term participant and observer, LTP will continue to dedicate resources to ecosystem building and industry dialogue, helping to usher in the next decade of digital assets.

A full post-event report, including detailed roundtable highlights and key speaker insights, will be released shortly. Stay tuned.

About LTP

LTP is a global institutional prime broker, purpose-built to meet the evolving needs of digital asset market participants. By applying traditional financial standards to blockchain innovation, LTP provides end-to-end prime services spanning trade execution, clearing, settlement, custody, and financing. Its offerings further extend to institutional asset management, regulated OTC block trading, and compliant on/off-ramp solutions — delivering a secure and scalable foundation for institutions across the digital asset ecosystem.

LiquidityTech Limited is HK SFC licensed for Type 1, 2, 4, 5, and 9 regulated activities.

Advertisement

Liquidity Technology Limited is BVI FSC licensed to act as a Virtual Asset Service Provider and licensed under SIBA for Dealing in Investments activities.

Liquidity Technology S.L. is registered with Bank of Spain as a Virtual Asset Service Provider.

Liquidity Fintech Pty Ltd AUSTRAC registered for digital currency exchange, remittance, and foreign exchange service provider activities.

Liquidity Fintech Investment Limited is BVI FSC licensed to provide investment management services.

Advertisement

Neutrium Trust Limited is registered as a Trust Company under the Trustee Ordinance and licensed as a Trust or Company Service Provider under AMLO.

Liquidity Fintech FZE, granted In-Principle Approval (IPA) by the Dubai VARA for a VASP licence (note: IPA does not permit regulated activities).

Disclaimer: All regulated activities are performed exclusively by the relevant entities that are duly licensed or registered, and strictly within the boundaries of their respective regulatory approvals and jurisdictions.

More details: https://www.liquiditytech.com

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Solana Price Prediction: Interactive Brokers Supports SOL, Galaxy Doubles Down

Published

on

🚨

Solana is holding its breath, trading at the $84 price level, it is barely moving with just 1% gain in the last 24 hours, as opposed to BTC 2.4% gain and ETH 4.5%, even with bullish catalysts that bring a good prediction. Institutional heavyweights Interactive Brokers and Galaxy Digital signal a deepening commitment to the network, and could force a directional move soon.

Institutional pressure is building on both sides of the trade. Galaxy’s continued positioning in SOL infrastructure and Interactive Brokers’ expanded support for the asset add credibility to the bull thesis, even as the broader market sits in near-extreme fear.

The macro headwinds are real. But so is the on-chain growth underpinning SOL’s longer-term case. ETF inflows into Solana products remain a live catalyst that institutional desks are watching closely.

Advertisement

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Solana Price Prediction: $95 or $75 Next?

SOL has been compressing in a tightening range under $90, a setup that can resolved with a sharp move in either direction. At $84 with a 1.5% single-day decline, the immediate picture looks defensive, but RSI sits at 46, a technical buy signal that suggests sellers haven’t fully taken control yet.

Resistance is stacked. Immediate ceiling at $88, then the $90.50–$91 zone, with $95 acting as the breakout trigger that unlocks the bull case. Above that level, we can safely target $115–$125.

Advertisement
Solana price is holding; it is barely moving with just 1% gain in the last 24 hours, even with bullish catalysts that bring a good prediction.
SOL USD, TradingView

But a breakdown below the $75 support zone opens the door to deeper downside. The setup is binary. Position sizing accordingly.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Maxi Doge Targets Early Mover Upside as Solana Tests Key Levels

SOL at $84 with a $95 breakout requirement means most of the easy money on this trade has already been made. For traders calculating risk-reward on a market-cap-weighted basis, the upside from here demands patience and assumes macro conditions cooperate. That’s where early-stage positioning starts looking different on a spreadsheet.

Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is an Ethereum-based meme token built around a 240-lb canine juggernaut and a 1000x leverage trading mentality, genuinely unhinged energy, deliberately so.

Advertisement

The project has raised more than $4,7 million at a current price of $0.00028, with 66% staking APY bonus available for holders. Features include holder-only trading competitions with leaderboard rewards, a Maxi Fund treasury for liquidity and partnerships, and meme-first marketing built on viral gym-bro humor.

Research Maxi Doge and join the army.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Crypto assets are highly volatile. Always do your own research before investing.

Advertisement

The post Solana Price Prediction: Interactive Brokers Supports SOL, Galaxy Doubles Down appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strategy’s STRC maintains dividend at 11.5% after steady increases

Published

on

Strategy’s STRC maintains dividend at 11.5% after steady increases

Strategy, the world’s largest publicly traded Bitcoin holder, has held the 11.5% dividend rate on its perpetual preferred stock, Stretch (STRC). This marks the first time the product has not seen a dividend increase since the product launched in July 2025.

STRC debuted in July 2025 with a 9% dividend and has since undergone seven dividend increases. The company was able to maintain the current rate after the volume weighted average price (VWAP) for the month reached $99.95, keeping the shares close enough to their $100 par value.

Strategy positions STRC as a short duration, high yield savings alternative. The perpetual preferred stock pays monthly cash distributions, with the dividend rate adjusted each month to support trading near par and limit price volatility.

During Tuesday’s session, STRC held close to par for most of the day. The company is estimated to have purchased over 1,000 BTC, and it took 12 days for STRC to recover back to par following the ex dividend date. It is likely the shares will continue trading near par over the next two weeks, leading up to the April 14 ex dividend date.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Strive (ASST), the bitcoin treasury asset manager, saw its own perpetual preferred product, SATA, reach $100 par for the first time. This enabled the company to issue shares through its at the market (ATM) program to fund additional bitcoin purchases. SATA currently offers a dividend rate of 12.7%.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Aave V4 Launches on Ethereum Mainnet

Published

on

Aave V4 Launches on Ethereum Mainnet


Announced at EthCC in Cannes, the upgrade enables institution-specific borrowing environments, structured credit products, and RWA-backed lending within a unified liquidity system.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Australia passes crypto regulation requiring exchanges to obtain financial services licenses

Published

on

Australia passes crypto regulation requiring exchanges to obtain financial services licenses

Australia passed legislation on Wednesday, creating its first comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets that requires crypto exchanges and custody providers to obtain financial services licenses.

The Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025 cleared both houses on April 1, bringing firms that hold digital assets on behalf of customers into the existing Australian Financial Services Licence regime.

Australia’s bill creates two new regulated categories under the Corporations Act: digital asset platforms, which hold crypto on behalf of users, and tokenized custody platforms, which hold real-world assets and issue a corresponding digital token.

Operators of both must obtain an Australian Financial Services License from ASIC, bringing them under the same core rules as brokers or fund managers, including requirements to safeguard client assets, provide standardized disclosures, avoid misleading conduct, and maintain dispute resolution and compensation systems.

Advertisement

Instead of regulating crypto itself, the law targets the companies in the middle that control customer funds, aiming to reduce risks like commingling, insolvency, and misuse of assets that have caused losses in past crypto failures.

Research from the Digital Finance Cooperative Research Center and industry groups estimates Australia could generate as much as A$24 billion annually from tokenized markets, payments, and digital assets, roughly 1% of GDP. Under the previous regulatory path, the country was on track to capture just A$1 Billion of that by 2030.

A Kraken spokesperson said the law provides a “top-down signal” that Australia is serious about digital assets, adding that clearer rules would give firms confidence to invest and expand locally.

Kate Cooper, CEO of OKX Australia and co-chair of the Digital Economy Council of Australia, called the bill a “pivotal moment,” saying it establishes a foundation for institutional participation and long-term capital allocation.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Price of tungsten, sulfur and helium

Published

on

How the Iran war is squeezing metals markets and key industries

Almonty’s tungsten mine in Sangdong, South Korea, in March 2026.

Almonty

BEIJING — The Iran war is squeezing a global commodities market already pressured by China’s export controls and stockpiling efforts.

Advertisement

Prices of three niche elements — tungsten, sulfur and helium — have climbed sharply in recent weeks.

While none of the commodities are traded as widely as oil, the surge indicates how ripple effects from the Middle East conflict could end up restricting production of the semiconductors that power artificial intelligence advances.

Tungsten, a metal nearly as hard as a diamond, creates the electrical connection in the core of a semiconductor chip. Sulfuric acid, a byproduct of sulfur, cleans chip wafers. Helium enables smooth production of semiconductors since the gas prevents unwanted chemical reactions in the manufacturing process.

Those are just some of the ways in which the three elements have become critical for modern manufacturing, including for defense.

Advertisement

Beijing started to ramp up its control over the critical supplies even before the Iran war started on Feb. 28, partly as tensions with the U.S. escalated over the last few years.

China started restricting tungsten exports just over a year ago, and in December called for tighter limits on sulfuric acid exports. Helium, a gas that’s difficult to store, saw the volume of Chinese imports rise by 15.7% in 2025, after a nearly 65% surge in 2024, according to Wind Information.

The Iran war and the ensuing constraints on the Strait of Hormuz, a critical Middle East shipping route for energy and chemicals, has tipped some oversupply situations into undersupply, while exacerbating existing shortages.

How the Iran war is squeezing metals markets and key industries

Prices of the three commodities have jumped in some cases by more than oil. The widely used fossil fuel has climbed by more than 50% in March, putting Brent on track for a record month.

“While the Chinese supply chain is being viewed as more resilient than many peers, the risk of disruption in chemicals as raw materials for manufacturers in selected segments is higher than expected based on the feedback,” Goldman Sachs analysts said in a report late last week, citing nearly 40 commodity-related meetings and site visits in China.

Advertisement

Tungsten

Tungsten hit a record high of over $3,000 late last week, marking a surge of well over 50% for the month and more than tripling in price since late December. That’s based on the industry benchmark called “ammonium para tungstate (APT)” in metric ton units, or MTU, from Fastmarket, as quoted by tungsten miner Almonty.

Almonty officially reopened a large tungsten mine in Sangdong, South Korea, earlier this month, and plans to start producing some tungsten this year at a project in the U.S. state of Montana.

The company’s CEO Lewis Black told CNBC that defense sector demand for tungsten has been “extremely strong” since the beginning of last year, but that there’s been no notable change despite the Iran war.

“There’s no material to stockpile. That’s probably the biggest change,” he said.

Advertisement

Sulfur

The price of sulfuric acid in Africa is now at least 30% higher than it was prior to the war, and is still rising, the Goldman Sachs analysts said, citing a local Chinese miner in Africa.

Other assessments point to a milder rise in prices.

China sulfur prices, including cost and freight, climbed by about 13% from early March to $621 per tonne as of March 26, according to S&P Global Platts.

“A 2-3 month effective blockade would likely become a severe supply shock, especially as freight/insurance stay elevated and Middle East-origin cargoes become harder to execute,” Pan Yuya, lead analyst for sulfur and phosphate raw materials at S&P Global Energy, and Isaac Zhao, senior principal analyst, China fertilizers at S&P Global Energy, said in a March 20 note.

Advertisement

The S&P analysts said that around 56% of China’s sulfur imports came from the Middle East in 2025.

“Even prior to the Middle East conflict, sulfur prices were rising sharply as the market tightened. With sulfur prices now at fresh record highs, the ‘super squeeze’ in this rather obscure commodity in supply warrants further examination,” HSBC analysts said in a March 16 report.

Helium

Helium prices have roughly doubled since the Iran war began, according to Fitch Ratings.

As most trading occurs through long-term private contracts between industrial gas suppliers and manufacturers, it is difficult to pinpoint industry-wide prices, said Shelley Jang, Fitch’s director of Asia-Pacific corporate ratings.

Advertisement

Iranian missile attacks this month crippled a key industrial center in Qatar, which produces about one-third of the world’s helium.

That implies helium supply won’t be restored anytime soon, pointed out Christopher Ecclestone, principal and mining strategist at Hallgarten & Company.

In one indication of further market tightness, prices of helium in China’s Henan province have reversed a downturn this year to climb from a Feb. 28 low of 545 yuan ($78.85) a bottle to 600 yuan ($86.81), according to Wind Information.

Weekly analysis and insights from Asia’s largest economy in your inbox
Subscribe now
Advertisement

Shortages caused by the Iran war are the latest supply chain disruption to rock global markets, which faced similar shocks from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the Covid-19 pandemic. That’s pushed companies to diversify, and countries such as China to ramp up stockpiling plans.

“Access to supplies of certain physical materials where production and processing is concentrated in China will become more frequent topics of negotiations with Beijing,” Rhodium Group said in a March 24 report.

Limited price transparency also means the shortage could be worse than available numbers suggest.

Tungsten and helium prices have been surging, “but you don’t have anyone on the buy side saying, ‘oh my goodness, we don’t have enough product,’” Ecclestone said. “Defense contractors should have warehouses of tungsten, but they don’t.”

Advertisement

“The world has got lazy. It thinks life is like a supermarket, the product is a pack of cornflakes or a few tons of sulfuric acid,” he said. “The supermarket of commodities has had a few of the aisles chopped down.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Valinor Raises $25M Seed Round to Bring Private Credit Onchain

Published

on

Valinor Raises $25M Seed Round to Bring Private Credit Onchain


The ex-Blackstone team wants to move beyond crypto-collateralized loans and into ‘real economy credit’ as the tokenized RWA sector continues to grow.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Fidelity says Bitcoin’s Cycle Drawdown is the Mildest Yet

Published

on

Fidelity says Bitcoin’s Cycle Drawdown is the Mildest Yet

Bitcoin has declined by about 50% this market cycle, far less than in previous cycles, Fidelity Digital Assets said, adding this trend could continue over time. 

Bitcoin’s post-all-time-high drawdowns have historically been steep, at about 80% to 90%, but this cycle has been about 50%, Fidelity Digital Assets research analyst Zack Wainwright said Tuesday.

One can see the “diminishing returns” that have developed from cycle to cycle when looking at Bitcoin’s price performance from the perspective of the previous all-time high, he said.

“Each cycle has been less dramatic to the upside than the previous,” he said. “Downside risk has been less dramatic in 2026, the current cycle, as well,” he added. 

Advertisement

Bitcoin’s price hit its current cycle low of just over $60,000 on Feb. 6, a decline of 52% from its Oct. 6 all-time high of about $126,000, according to TradingView. It is currently down 46% from its peak six months ago. 

The previous cycle saw a much larger decline of 77%, from the 2021 all-time high of $69,000 to a bear market low just below $16,000 in November 2022. 

Bitcoin may bottom in late September

Fidelity’s assessment that this Bitcoin cycle is notably shallower than prior cycles “indicates a maturing market with reduced volatility and stronger institutional confidence,” Nick Ruck, director of LVRG Research, told Cointelegraph on Wednesday. 

“This shift signals that Bitcoin is changing from a speculative asset toward a more stable store of value, potentially paving the way for greater adoption in the future.”

Related: Bitcoin’s $10K range expected to hold until spot traders show up: Data

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Alphractal founder Joao Wedson observed Tuesday that Bitcoin’s top occurred 534 days after the last halving, a shorter span than in the previous cycle.

This “decaying pattern” across cycles suggests the historical bottom may occur between 912 and 922 days after the halving, which “points to a bottom in late September or early October 2026,” he said. 

BTC is below key daily moving averages 

Bitcoin remains below the key 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages, two long-term trend indicators. 

It is hovering at the 200-week EMA, around $68,000, which has served as a key level of support during previous market downturns. 

Advertisement
BTC remains below key daily moving averages. Source: TradingView

Magazine: Nobody knows if quantum secure cryptography will even work