Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Drift Protocol Lands $150 Million Lifeline in Aftermath of Exploit Shock

Published

on

Drift Protocol TVL

Drift Protocol has announced a collaboration with Tether (USDT) and other partners totaling nearly $150 million to fund user recovery and a protocol relaunch following its April 1 exploit on Solana (SOL).

The package includes a $100 million revenue-linked credit facility, an ecosystem grant, and loans to designated market makers. USDT will serve as the settlement asset when the protocol relaunches.

Recovery Pool and Token for Impacted Users

The funds, out of which $127.5 million is reportedly from Tether, will support a dedicated user recovery pool fed by exchange revenue and committed support capital.

Drift stated that any assets recovered through ongoing law enforcement and blockchain forensics efforts will also flow into the pool.

Advertisement

To distribute recovery assets, Drift will issue a new transferable token to users affected by the April 1 exploit. The team said additional details on token mechanics will follow in the near term.

The April 1 attack drained between $270 million and $285 million from Drift’s vaults.

Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic attributed the operation to North Korean state-linked actors who spent six months infiltrating the protocol’s inner circle.

Advertisement

Attackers posed as a quantitative trading firm, built trust at conferences, and compromised devices through a malicious TestFlight app and a VSCode vulnerability.

They then manipulated Drift’s multisig approvals using Solana’s durable nonces feature to drain core vaults holding USDC, SOL, and JLP tokens.

The incident slashed Drift’s total value locked from $550 million to roughly $230 million. The Drift (DRIFT) token dropped over 30% in the immediate aftermath. The protocol’s TVL was $243 million as of this writing.

Drift Protocol TVL
Drift Protocol TVL. Source: DefiLlama

Hardened Security and USDT-Centered Relaunch

Before relaunching, every protocol component will pass independent audits from OtterSec and Asymmetric Research.

Drift will also introduce a community-governed multisig for core protocol assets, requiring all signers to use dedicated devices with transaction content verified outside the primary signing interface.

Advertisement

Tether has proposed extending a USDT support facility to market makers to ensure deep liquidity from day one.

The shift to USDT settlement marks a notable pivot after Circle declined to freeze stolen USDC during the original attack.

Circle’s position on the matter is that it didn’t freeze stolen USDC because it can only act with legal orders, not on its own.

Advertisement

“When Circle freezes USDC, it is not because we have decided, unilaterally or arbitrarily, that someone’s assets should be taken from them. It is because the law requires us to act,” wrote Circle’s CSO Dante Disparte in a blog.

Tether’s involvement signals a growing willingness among stablecoin issuers to act as ecosystem backstops during major crises.

“The willingness of Paolo Ardoino Tether and our partners to commit real capital to Drift’s recovery says something about the strength of what we’ve built and what we’re building next, as well as our shared vision to scale the Solana DeFi ecosystem together,” said Cindy Leow, co-founder at Drift Protocol.

However, the partial recovery also highlights persistent vulnerabilities in operational security, even among mature protocols.

Drift described the plan as its first step toward making users whole over time.

The post Drift Protocol Lands $150 Million Lifeline in Aftermath of Exploit Shock appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

After Kalshi Appeal, Prediction Markets Fight Could Head to Supreme Court

Published

on

Law, CFTC, Court, Kalshi, Prediction Markets

An appellate court is expected to reach a decision after hearing arguments from Kalshi and lawyers representing the state of Nevada.

Some legal experts speculated that the state vs. federal jurisdiction battle over regulating prediction markets companies could soon be headed to the United States Supreme Court.

On Thursday, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral arguments from lawyers representing prediction markets platform Kalshi and Nevada authorities over the state’s ban on the prediction markets’ event contracts. The appeal was over a lower court decision preventing Kalshi from offering certain event-based contracts in Nevada, based on claims that the company needed a gaming license.

Advertisement
Law, CFTC, Court, Kalshi, Prediction Markets
Thursday oral arguments by Kalshi and the State of Nevada. Source: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

The appellate judge overseeing Thursday’s oral arguments and the lawyer for Kalshi acknowledged that there had been several state-level enforcement actions against the company and other prediction market platforms, including criminal charges filed in Arizona. However, last week a federal court blocked Arizona authorities from enforcing the state’s gambling laws on Kalshi’s event contracts.

“I think the body of case law does demonstrate that what we really need to avoid here is having a state and a federal court considering exactly the same issue at exactly the same time and potentially reaching different outcomes,” said Colleen Sinzdak, representing Kalshi.

Related: CFTC probes oil futures trades tied to Trump’s moves in Iran: Report

Central to Kalshi’s argument was that the platform’s event contracts were “swaps” falling under the purview of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) rather than state gaming authorities. CFTC Chair Michael Selig has backed this position in the case of Crypto.com’s prediction markets against Nevada authorities.

The appellate court did not immediately announce a decision following oral arguments. Any ruling could affect how state courts treat prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket as policymakers come to terms with the growing market, expected to reach $1 trillion by 2030.

Advertisement

Coinbase’s top lawyer weighs in on prediction market arguments

Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal, whose company was not a party to the Kalshi proceedings but has a stake in the prediction markets fight, speculated that the case could go the US Supreme Court.

“The questions at oral argument are an unreliable signal in predicting the leanings of a court,” said Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal in a Thursday X post following the oral arguments. “Either way, I stand by my longstanding prediction— the Supreme Court will resolve whether sports [contracts] on [Designated Contract Markets] are swaps subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the CFTC.”

The US Supreme Court gave states the authority to regulate sports gambling in its 2018 decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association.

Advertisement

Magazine: Should users be allowed to bet on war and death in prediction markets?