Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

ECB Study Concludes DeFi DAOs Aren’t as Decentralized as They Claim

Published

on

ECB Study Concludes DeFi DAOs Aren't as Decentralized as They Claim

A new working paper from the European Central Bank examined four major protocols and found that a small number of actors control the bulk of governance token holdings.

A European Central Bank working paper challenges the notion that decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) deliver on their promise of distributed governance, finding that token holdings and voting power across four major DeFi protocols are heavily concentrated among a handful of actors.

The study examined governance structures at Aave, MakerDAO, Ampleforth, and Uniswap using data from late 2022 and mid-2023. The researchers analyzed the top 100 token holders and top 20 voters for each protocol, reviewed 248 governance proposals, and attempted to trace the real-world identities behind pseudonymous blockchain addresses.

The findings land at a moment when governance disputes are roiling some of the very protocols examined in the study, and DeFi projects more broadly are grappling with whether the Labs-plus-DAO structure is fit for purpose.

Advertisement

Top 100 Holders Command Over 80% of Supply

Across all four protocols, the top 100 holders controlled more than 80% of the total governance token supply during both snapshot periods. At Aave and Uniswap, the top five accounted for roughly half of all holdings. MakerDAO was the relative outlier, with the top five holding around 36%.

The concentration proved sticky over time, with distributions remaining largely unchanged between October 2022 and May 2023.

When the researchers dug into who sits behind the top addresses, they found that for most protocols, roughly half or more of holdings traced to addresses associated with the protocols themselves — encompassing treasuries, founders, and developer allocations — or to centralized and decentralized exchanges.

Protocol-associated addresses held 43% of Uniswap’s UNI supply. Centralized exchange holdings were particularly notable at Aave (16%) and Ampleforth (19%). Binance emerged as the dominant exchange holder across all four protocols, with holdings ranging from 2% to 15% of total supply.

Advertisement

The researchers cautioned that available data doesn’t distinguish between tokens held by exchanges on their own behalf versus those held in custody for customers.

Delegates Dominate Voting

The most active voters on governance proposals turned out to be predominantly delegates — entities to whom smaller token holders assign their voting power. This dynamic has long been a known issue in DAO governance, where low voter turnout and outsized whale participation leave a small group of recurring participants shaping protocol decisions.

The top voter at Uniswap in both snapshots was a16z, the venture capital firm, which saw its delegator count grow from 100 to 125 over the study period. At Aave, the protocol’s own smart contracts held the top-voter position.

Of the 68 top voters identified across all protocols, the researchers could not determine the identities of roughly one-third to nearly half of them. Among those they could identify, individuals made up about 21%, followed by Web3 companies at 19%, university blockchain societies, and VC firms.

Advertisement

Uniswap had the highest delegation rate at 27%, with its top 18 voters holding more than half the delegated power.

The ECB team also systematically categorized the 248 proposals and found that “risk parameters” — covering loan-to-value ratios, liquidation thresholds, borrowing rates, and debt ceilings — were the most common, accounting for 28%. Asset listing proposals made up 23%.

Implications for Regulation

The findings carry direct implications for the ongoing policy debate over how to regulate DeFi. The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation exempts services provided in a “fully decentralized manner,” but the ECB researchers argue the protocols they studied fall well short of that standard.

Governance token holders, protocol developers, and centralized exchanges have frequently been proposed as potential regulatory entry points. However, the researchers concluded that the ambiguity surrounding who actually controls governance makes all three difficult to use in practice.

Advertisement

“It is not always clear who in the end is responsible or can be held accountable based on publicly available data,” the authors wrote.

The paper also drew parallels between DeFi governance and traditional corporate shareholder governance, noting that both systems suffer from low voter turnout and outsized influence by a small number of recurring participants.

But DeFi lacks the institutional safeguards — proxy voting rules, stewardship codes, disclosure requirements, and fiduciary obligations — that help mitigate those dynamics in public companies. As DAOs increasingly adopt formal legal structures, the researchers suggested that hybrid models integrating traditional legal frameworks with blockchain-based governance may ultimately be needed.

This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

US Lawmakers Unveil Crypto Tax Plan With No Bitcoin Exemption

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

An early-stage discussion draft released by U.S. lawmakers seeks a comprehensive overhaul of how digital assets are taxed, aiming to clarify treatment across a range of activities—from stablecoins to lending and staking. Introduced as a conversation starter rather than a bill, the Digital Asset PARITY Act outlines proposed changes to the Internal Revenue Code that would reshape the tax landscape for individuals and institutions engaging with crypto in the United States.

The draft, authored by Representatives Max Miller and Steven Horsford, would set out specific rules for stablecoins, address cost-basis calculations, and establish de minimis exemptions for smaller transactions. Notably, the proposal stops short of an outright crypto tax framework and is framed as a starting point for a broader policy discussion among lawmakers, industry participants, and other stakeholders.

Conversations around the draft emphasize that if enacted, these provisions could influence onramping activity, compliance costs, and how crypto yields are reported. The document is not a bill introduced in Congress, but rather a discussion draft designed to spur debate on how the United States might modernize its tax code to accommodate digital assets.

Key takeaways

  • Stablecoins may escape gains taxation if their cost basis remains within 1% of $1 (or $0.01), according to the discussion draft. This threshold would shape when gains on stablecoin holdings are recognized for tax purposes.
  • Costs associated with acquiring or moving regulated dollar-pegged stablecoins would not be counted toward an investor’s cost basis, potentially lowering the taxable baseline for some trades.
  • A de minimis exemption would apply to stablecoin transactions under $200, meaning those small trades would not trigger tax or reporting requirements. The act does not specify an annual cap yet.
  • Income earned from lending, staking, or passive validator services would be treated as ordinary gross income in the year it is earned, measured by fair market value at the time of receipt.
  • The proposal remains a discussion draft and has not been introduced as legislation; its purpose is to solicit input from lawmakers, industry participants, and the crypto community on how to overhaul crypto tax policy.

What the draft proposes and why it matters

The Digital Asset PARITY Act proposes a framework intended to bring greater clarity to how digital assets are taxed, with a focus on stabilizing tax outcomes for users who hold or transact with digital currencies that are designed to maintain a stable value. The centerpiece is a potential threshold-based treatment for stablecoins, aimed at reducing the tax friction associated with routine use of dollar-pegged tokens in everyday commerce or yield-generating activities.

Beyond stablecoins, the draft also addresses the allocation of tax burdens for earnings generated through decentralized finance (DeFi) activities. By treating income from lending, staking, and related validator services as ordinary gross income in the year earned, the proposal would require taxpayers to recognize fair market value at the time of receipt, aligning crypto income with traditional tax treatment for similar financial activities.

Advertisement

Officials behind the draft stress that the document is intended to catalyze cross-sector dialogue. They emphasize that any final policy will depend on congressional negotiations, administrative considerations, and input from the crypto industry and other stakeholders. The draft explicitly notes that it has not been introduced as formal legislation and invites feedback on the proposed structures.

Analysts and advocates see the bill as a reflection of the ongoing tension between fostering crypto innovation and maintaining robust tax oversight. From an investor perspective, the provisions could affect how quickly and efficiently activities such as yield farming, staking, and stablecoin usage move into formal compliance, potentially altering risk calculations and after-tax returns.

Industry responses and tensions

Reaction to the discussion draft highlights competing priorities within the crypto policy sphere. Cody Carbone, CEO of the Digital Chamber, framed the draft as a call for much-needed clarity in digital asset taxation. In a statement tied to the draft’s release, he underscored the risk of tax policy that remains ambiguous or misaligned with onshore activity, arguing that clear rules are essential for bringing more activity into the regulated economy.

“We need digital asset tax clarity or activity will never fully onshore,”

— Cody Carbone, Digital Chamber

Advertisement

Among Bitcoin advocates, the reaction was more skeptical, signaling concerns that the plan privileges stablecoins while bypassing a similar tax treatment for Bitcoin (BTC). The draft’s de minimis provision for stablecoins—but not for BTC—echoes ongoing debates about how decentralized, permissionless digital assets should be treated for tax purposes. Critics argue that stablecoins, being centrally issued and regulated, do not share the same decentralized attributes as BTC and should not enjoy the same exemptions.

“This is the wrong direction to go in,”

— Pierre Rochard, CEO, The Bitcoin Bond Company, commenting on the draft’s approach to de minimis relief and stablecoins

The broader policy landscape includes other proposed or pending measures, some of which contemplate various forms of tax relief or exemptions for BTC, while continuing to assess the equity of the tax treatment for stablecoins and other digital assets. Observers note that the Digital Asset PARITY Act aligns with an ongoing push to reform crypto taxation but remains a preliminary draft that will require extensive debate before any legislative action.

Context, implications, and what comes next

The draft arrives at a moment when policymakers are increasingly focused on how to create a workable tax regime for rapid innovation in digital assets, including DeFi, tokenized securities, and cross-border use cases. By proposing targeted exemptions and income-recognition rules, the authors aim to balance revenue considerations with practical usage patterns—especially for stablecoins that underpin much of DeFi liquidity, payments, and on-chain settlement.

Advertisement

For investors and developers, the move signals potential shifts in tax planning and compliance obligations. If adopted, the rules could influence how projects structure incentives, how wallets and exchanges report activity, and how users assess the after-tax viability of various crypto strategies. The discussion also foregrounds potential regulatory bifurcations between stablecoins and other digital assets, a theme that could shape policy debates in the coming months.

As Congress weighs the draft, stakeholders will scrutinize the mechanics of the proposed cost-basis rules, the exact thresholds for exemptions, and how these changes would integrate with existing tax provisions. The process will likely involve multiple committees, hearings, and stakeholder rounds before any formal bill could emerge. Market participants should watch for: whether the de minimis threshold for stablecoins is preserved or revised, whether BTC-specific exemptions gain traction, and how the definition of “regulated” stablecoins evolves in alignment with broader regulatory expectations.

In the near term, observers expect further commentary from industry groups, think tanks, and lawmakers as the dialogue around crypto taxation intensifies. The Digital Asset PARITY Act stands as a litmus test for how policymakers intend to reconcile traditional tax rules with the increasingly complex and transformative world of digital assets.

Readers should stay tuned for updates on whether the discussion draft progresses toward formal consideration and how the evolving policy debate will influence tax reporting, compliance costs, and the broader adoption path for digital assets in the United States.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Professional Algorithmic Trading for the Top 50 Crypto Assets

Published

on

Professional Algorithmic Trading for the Top 50 Crypto Assets

Introduction

In cryptocurrency markets, success is rarely about prediction alone. It comes down to execution, consistency, and discipline — areas where human traders often fall short.

QBots addresses this gap by offering a fully automated trading platform designed to execute strategies with precision across the most liquid digital assets. Rather than relying on manual decisions, users can deploy algorithmic strategies that operate continuously, removing emotion from the process.

Focused on the Top 50 cryptocurrencies by market capitalisation, QBots enables users to automate trading across major global exchanges with efficiency and control.

Advanced Strategies for Every Market Condition

QBots provides a suite of strategies designed to perform across different market environments:

Advertisement
  • Mean Reversion: Capitalises on price movements returning to historical averages, ideal for volatile and range-bound markets.
  • Futures Grid Trading: Automates buying and selling within predefined price ranges, turning short-term volatility into structured returns.
  • Momentum Trading: Identifies strong trends and enters positions when directional movement is confirmed.
  • Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA): Reduces timing risk by spreading entries over time, improving average entry price.
  • Arbitrage & Scalping: Exploits small price inefficiencies across highly liquid pairs for frequent, short-term opportunities.

These strategies allow users to operate with a level of consistency and speed typically reserved for institutional trading desks.

Global Access with Real Execution

QBots integrates directly with leading exchanges through secure API connections. This allows users to:

  • Retain full control of their funds (funds safe on mexc, bybit or binance)
  • Execute trades automatically in real time
  • Deploy multiple strategies simultaneously

By focusing on the most liquid assets, QBots ensures that trades are executed efficiently, with minimal slippage and strong market depth.

Built-In Risk Management

Automation without control is risk — which is why QBots incorporates:

  • Customisable stop-loss and take-profit settings
  • Strategy-level risk parameters
  • Defined capital allocation per trade

This allows users to tailor their approach based on their risk tolerance while maintaining systematic execution.

Referral Program: Build Recurring Income

QBots also introduces a referral program designed for recurring income.

Users can invite others to the platform and earn a percentage of subscription revenue generated by their network. As long as referrals remain active, earnings continue — creating a scalable income stream alongside trading activity.

Advertisement

This turns QBots into not just a trading tool, but a distribution-driven ecosystem.

Additional Benefits

Users who choose to pay for QBots subscriptions using QIE tokens receive discounted pricing, adding an additional layer of value for participants within the broader ecosystem.

Conclusion

QBots represents a shift away from manual, emotion-driven trading toward structured, automated execution.

By combining institutional-grade strategies, real-time execution, built-in risk management, and scalable earning opportunities, QBots enables users to participate in crypto markets with greater consistency and efficiency.

Advertisement

In a market driven by speed and discipline, automation is no longer optional — it is an advantage.

Explore QBots and deploy your first automated strategy today.

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Price Prediction: Pepeto Targets 1000x as $14B Options Expiry Crashes BTC While ETH and BNB Slide

Published

on

Ethereum Price Prediction: Pepeto Targets 1000x as $14B Options Expiry Crashes BTC While ETH and BNB Slide

One hundred million Americans carry medical debt, and one emergency room visit averaging $2,700 can put a family underwater for years. A $14 billion options expiry just crashed BTC below $68,000 while oil topped $100 for the first time this cycle.

The ethereum price prediction points to respectable growth and its staying power is real, but if the reader has eyes on returns that clear every medical bill from one entry, Pepeto has raised more than $8 million with a live exchange already serving traders and 1000x potential as the Binance listing approaches.

A $14 billion options expiry on Deribit collided with the macro selloff on March 27, crashing BTC below $68,000 as oil topped $100 and bond yields spiked higher according to CryptoSlate.

The crash wiped $300 million in leveraged longs and pushed the Fear and Greed Index to 10. According to InvestingNews, BTC hit $66,400, its lowest since March 9, as Treasury yields climbed for four straight weeks.

Advertisement

The ETH forecast faces serious pressure in this environment, and the real returns live further down the stack in presale entries where 1000x is the math.

The Ethereum Forecast Weighed Against What This Market Actually Needs

Pepeto: The Verified Exchange With 1000x Potential Where the Next Dogecoin Is Forming

The $14 billion options expiry just proved that the biggest players in crypto can move the entire market in a single session, and the ETH forecast is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Pepeto is the verified exchange with 1000x potential where the next Dogecoin is forming, because no project in 2026 has matched this combination of viral energy and real exchange tools.

The exchange fills an urgent need for better trading protection. PepetoSwap clears every trade without charging fees so the reader’s medical bill money stays intact, the asset relay moves tokens between chains at zero expense, and the safety scanner reviews every contract before capital commits, confirmed by a SolidProof audit.

The same person who took the original Pepe token from zero to $11 billion market cap without any products constructed this exchange, and more than $8 million raised during a single digit fear reading is the conviction signal the $14 billion options expiry was designed to hide.

Advertisement

The wallets that entered Dogecoin early built the kind of wealth this cycle is about to produce again, and the ones entering Pepeto now are positioned for the same outcome with a working exchange behind it. Analysts project 1000x from the current entry at $0.000000186, and 192% APY staking multiplies the reader’s allocation while the listing countdown runs. The bull market is forming, and the wallets are entering with size because once the listing arrives this entry disappears permanently.

Ethereum (ETH)

ETH trades at $1,988  per CoinMarketCap, pressured by the $14 billion options expiry and over 75% leveraged positioning on Binance.

The ethereum price prediction targets $4,000 by year end, an impressive 95% ceiling, but if the reader carries $2,700 in medical debt from one ER visit, the life changing returns live in the presale entries where 1000x is still the math.

Binance Coin (BNB)

BNB trades at $610 per CoinGecko, holding steady while the broader market corrects around it. A recovery to $750 delivers 19% over months, a strong ecosystem anchor that suits patient holders.

Advertisement

While Pepeto at presale pricing offers the kind of return that turns a $2,700 medical emergency from a financial crisis into a rounding error.

The Ethereum Price Prediction Confirms the Bull Market and the Wallets Inside Pepeto See the Next Dogecoin Forming

The $14 billion options expiry crashed BTC below $68,000 and 100 million Americans are carrying medical debt they took on because one bad day happened at the wrong time.

The ethereum price prediction confirms the bull market is forming, but no project in 2026 has matched Pepeto’s combination of viral energy and real exchange tools, and the addresses filling this presale see the next Dogecoin forming inside it.

The Pepeto official website is where those wallets are entering with size, because once the listing arrives this entry disappears permanently and the people inside will hold the positions that turn a $2,700 ER visit from a crisis into a number they laugh about.

Advertisement

Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

FAQs

What does the ethereum price prediction look like as the $14B options expiry crashes BTC?

The ethereum price prediction targets $4,000 by year end, but Pepeto’s presale with a verified exchange and 1000x potential offers the returns only presale entries with 1000x potential produce.

Can anything outperform the ethereum price prediction in terms of returns?

Advertisement

Presale entries with working products deliver the 1000x returns that only presale entries produce, and the Pepeto official website is where the 1000x entry with a verified exchange is still open.

Is the ethereum price prediction still worth following in 2026?

The ethereum price prediction matters for portfolio anchoring, but Pepeto’s presale targets 1000x with the Pepe builder and Binance listing, the kind of return that clears medical debt.


Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ark Invest’s Bitcoin ETF hit by $30m outflow as spot funds see $171m drain

Published

on

Ark Invest’s Bitcoin ETF hit by $30m outflow as spot funds see $171m drain

Ark Invest’s Bitcoin ETF saw one of the sharpest single‑day outflows of the month this week, as investors yanked tens of millions of dollars from spot products just as Bitcoin slid back toward the mid‑$60,000s.

Summary

  • U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded about $171 million in net outflows on March 27, with Ark Invest’s ARK 21Shares fund among the hardest hit.
  • Ark’s CEO Cathie Wood, long one of Bitcoin’s loudest institutional bulls, now faces a tape where her flagship crypto vehicle is bleeding capital even as she reiterates long‑term upside.
  • The reversal in flows undercuts part of the “institutional floor” narrative that has supported Bitcoin since U.S. spot ETFs launched in early 2024.

The latest data show U.S. spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs posted a combined $171.12 million in net outflows on March 27, the largest one‑day withdrawal in more than three weeks and a stark contrast to the steady inflows seen earlier this month. According to ETF flow trackers, BlackRock’s IBIT led redemptions with roughly $41.9 million out, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC at about $32 million, while Ark Invest’s ARK 21Shares ETF saw approximately $30.5 million leave in a single session. Those exits hit as Bitcoin slipped back toward $70,000, with selling pressure from ETF desks reinforcing a broader risk‑off move across digital assets.

For Cathie Wood, the numbers add short‑term pain to a long‑running conviction trade. The Ark founder has for years argued that Bitcoin could eventually reach $500,000 if corporate treasuries and institutional allocators push even 5% of portfolios into the asset, telling CNBC at the SALT Conference that “the price will be ten‑fold what it is today” if that thesis plays out. Ark has backed that view with positioning, building exposure across vehicles such as its Next Generation Internet ETF and, more recently, via its ARK 21Shares spot product, which quickly became one of the most closely watched newcomers in the U.S. ETF lineup.

Advertisement

Yet the latest redemption wave shows how tactical those same institutions can be when macro conditions sour. Market data providers say investors are rotating out of risk assets on the back of sticky inflation, uncertainty over the Federal Reserve’s rate‑cut path, and escalating geopolitical tension around Iran, all of which have pushed volatility higher and forced some fast‑money players to de‑risk. “This pattern of inflows and outflows is becoming a key indicator of institutional positioning,” one ETF flow note observed, pointing out that even newer funds and smaller trusts such as VanEck’s HODL and Grayscale’s mini‑BTC product joined Ark’s ARKB in posting redemptions.

The move matters because Ark has been central to the story that spot ETFs would anchor Bitcoin with a deeper, more stable institutional base. Earlier in March, U.S. spot funds briefly flipped back to net inflows, including a day when the complex added about $167 million in fresh cash, suggesting some large accounts were willing to buy dips. That pattern appears to have reversed, at least temporarily, with several consecutive outflow days culminating in Thursday’s $171 million drawdown, undercutting the idea that ETF demand alone can offset macro shocks or positioning washes in derivatives.

Still, most analysts tracking Ark and its peers see the current outflows as tactical rather than a structural rejection of Bitcoin. Flows tend to whipsaw around options expiries, CPI releases, and geopolitical headlines, and Ark’s own research — including its latest Big Ideas 2026 report — continues to frame Bitcoin as a multi‑cycle, high‑conviction allocation rather than a quarter‑to‑quarter trade. For investors watching Wood’s ETF specifically, the question now is whether renewed inflows reappear on the next bout of weakness, or whether this week’s $30‑plus million exit marks the start of a longer period in which Ark’s name recognition is not enough to keep nervous capital from heading to the sidelines.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bittensor (TAO) Escapes 4-Month Long Barrier, Yet Price May Not Reach $400

Published

on

Bittensor (TAO) is trading at $322, down 6.97% on the session after briefly tagging $380 on March 26. 

The 2-day chart shows TAO has cleared the 0.618 Fibonacci resistance zone at $306 that capped every rally for four months, but the move above it has immediately stalled.

TAO Holders’ Sentiment Drove the Breakout

The Santiment weighted sentiment chart covers March 3 through March 26, 2026. TAO sentiment spiked to above 5.0 on March 25 — the highest reading on the chart — as price surged toward $380. By March 26, sentiment had collapsed to 0.684 as price reversed sharply.

This pattern repeated twice earlier in the month. On March 13, sentiment spiked sharply before price reversed from $305 back toward $260. On March 19, another sentiment spike preceded a drop from $290 back toward $250. Each time, elevated sentiment coincided with a local TAO price top rather than sustained upside.

Advertisement

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

TAO Weighted Sentiment
TAO Weighted Sentiment. Source: Santiment

The current reading of 0.684 is not yet negative, but the trajectory from above 5.0 to 0.684 in a single session mirrors the prior reversal patterns precisely. Sentiment drove capital into TAO at elevated prices and is now retreating, removing the buying pressure that generated the move.

Breaking This Ceiling Will Prove Beneficial For TAO

The TAO liquidation heatmap covers March 26 and 27. The brightest concentration of liquidation leverage — shown in yellow on the heatmap — sits at the $364 level, with 2.98 million in liquidation leverage at that exact price. Above $364, the cumulative short liquidation leverage reaches $17.81 million.

That $17.81 million short squeeze would be a powerful catalyst if triggered. A move through $364 would force those short positions closed, mechanically driving the price toward $407 and potentially $469. However, the 2.98 million in leverage concentrated at $364 itself acts as a magnet that also absorbs buying pressure, making it a ceiling before it becomes a springboard.

TAO Liquidation Heatmap
TAO Liquidation Heatmap. Source: Coinglass

With sentiment already collapsed and price pulling back from $380 without clearing $364 on a close, the short squeeze scenario requires a fresh wave of buying that is not currently visible in either the sentiment data or the price structure.

TAO Price Prediction: Drop Back Into the $306 Zone Before Any Continuation

TAO spent four months consolidating under the red resistance zone under the 0.618 level at $306. The annotated breakout measured move shows a 20.33% gain over the past week as TAO escaped it.

Advertisement

MFI adds further weight to the bearish near-term outlook. MFI reached the overbought threshold last week, and every prior instance where MFI reached this zone coincided with a local price top. 

TAO CMF
TAO CMF. Source: TradingView

In September 2024, MFI touched the overbought threshold as TAO traded near $700. In May 2025, MFI again reached the same level before the price rolled over from $450 toward $300. The current reading at 77.79 places TAO in identical territory on both occasions that preceded significant drawdowns. 

TAO at $322 is above the prior resistance zone. But, a daily close below $306 would confirm the breakout has failed and put the 0.5 level at $275 and then the 0.382 level at $243 in focus as the next support levels.

TAO Price Analysis.
TAO Price Analysis. Source: TradingView

The bullish invalidation requires a 2-day close above $364. That would trigger the $17.81 million short squeeze and mechanically push the price toward the 1.0 level at $407 and then the 1.236 level at $469. Without that close above $364, the four-month resistance zone that TAO just escaped threatens to reclaim the token.

The post Bittensor (TAO) Escapes 4-Month Long Barrier, Yet Price May Not Reach $400 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Morgan Stanley enters bitcoin ETF race with market-leading low fee

Published

on

Morgan Stanley enters bitcoin ETF race with market-leading low fee

Morgan Stanley plans to price its proposed spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) at 14 basis points, a level just below current low-cost options for similar products, according to an amended filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The move could set off a new round of fee competition among existing funds.

The latest S-1 filing, filed Friday, shows the bank undercutting rivals that charge closer to 15 to 25 basis points. The lowest fee on the market today is Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF , which carries a 0.15% expense ratio. Larger funds, including BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), priced their products at 25 basis points.

On paper, the gap looks narrow. In practice, it may be enough to shift money.

Spot bitcoin ETFs offer near-identical exposure. Each fund holds bitcoin and aims to track its price. That leaves cost as one of the few variables investors and advisors can act on. A financial advisor can move a client from one ETF to another with a single trade, keeping the same exposure while lowering annual fees.

Advertisement

That dynamic has shaped the ETF market before, and lower-cost products tend to attract inflows, while higher-fee funds can see assets drift out over time. Grayscale’s flagship product, its Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), holds about $10 billion in assets, down from $29 billion at launch in January 2024.

Morgan Stanley’s scale adds another layer. Its wealth management arm oversees trillions in client assets and has one of the largest adviser networks in the industry. Even small allocation changes across that base could move billions of dollars between funds.

The pricing decision also points to strategy. By entering with a lower fee, Morgan Stanley may be aiming to quickly gain share in a market where products are hard to differentiate. Cost and access, not structure, often decide which funds grow.

The filing follows confirmation from the New York Stock Exchange that it has issued a listing notice for MSBT, signaling the product could begin trading quickly if approved.

Advertisement

If regulators sign off, the fund would be the first spot bitcoin ETF issued directly by a major U.S. bank, setting up a new phase of competition where fees and distribution drive the outcome.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Stablecoin Jitters, AI Micropayments Reshape Crypto

Published

on

Stablecoin Jitters, AI Micropayments Reshape Crypto

Stablecoins are once again at the center of the crypto business narrative — but for very different reasons.

Circle’s sharp sell-off this week highlights how sensitive crypto equities remain to regulatory headlines, even when the underlying business fundamentals appear unchanged. At the same time, developments in Canada show institutions are moving in the opposite direction, quietly laying the groundwork for stablecoin integration into traditional finance.

Elsewhere, prediction markets are facing growing pressure to clean up their act as regulators zero in on manipulation risks, while a new thesis from Forrester suggests the long-promised micropayments economy may depend less on infrastructure — and more on AI agents.

The latest edition of Crypto Biz points to a market where regulation, automation and institutional adoption are reshaping how value moves across crypto rails.

Advertisement

Circle slides on CLARITY Act fears, Bernstein says sell-off overdone

Shares of Circle plunged 20% on Tuesday after reports that a draft of the proposed CLARITY Act could restrict stablecoin rewards, but analysts at Bernstein say the market reaction may be mispriced.

In a Wednesday note, Bernstein analysts said investors are conflating “who earns yield” with “who distributes yield.” The draft legislation targets platforms that pass yield to users, they said, while Circle’s core revenue comes from reserve income on USDC (USDC), not reward distribution.

The legislative proposal would prohibit yield on passive stablecoin holdings or products deemed equivalent to interest, but leaves room for rewards tied to user activity, such as trading or payments. Bernstein said these carve-outs could still allow incentive structures without disrupting issuer economics.

Circle generates revenue primarily from interest on reserves backing USDC, which are largely invested in short-term US Treasurys. Bernstein estimates this income reached about $2.6 billion in 2025, underscoring what it views as limited direct impact from the draft bill.

Advertisement
USDC’s onchain transaction volume has surged over the past two years. Source: Bernstein

Deloitte and Stablecorp prepare Canadian banks for stablecoins

Deloitte Canada is partnering with Stablecorp to bring stablecoin infrastructure into the country’s financial system, signaling growing institutional readiness ahead of new regulations. The initiative centers on integrating QCAD, a Canadian dollar–pegged stablecoin, into payment and settlement workflows.

The goal is to help financial institutions prepare for stablecoin adoption as Canada moves toward a formal regulatory framework for fiat-backed digital assets. Potential use cases include round-the-clock payments, faster settlement and improved transparency using blockchain-based systems.

QCAD is designed as a fully backed digital version of the Canadian dollar, aligning with expected regulatory requirements around reserves, compliance and risk management. This positions it as a candidate for institutional use once rules are finalized.

Source: Cointelegraph

Polymarket tightens rules as insider trading fears grow

Prediction platform Polymarket is overhauling its rulebook amid intensifying scrutiny of allegations of insider trading and market manipulation. The updates apply to both its decentralized platform and its US-regulated exchange, signaling a push toward stronger compliance standards.

The new framework introduces stricter market design rules, clearer criteria for resolving outcomes and expanded surveillance systems to detect suspicious activity. Polymarket is also limiting certain markets considered highly manipulable or ethically sensitive.

The changes come amid mounting concerns that prediction markets may be vulnerable to traders with privileged information — especially in geopolitical or political event markets. Lawmakers and regulators have increasingly questioned whether such platforms blur the line between financial markets and gambling.

Advertisement
Source: Polymarket

Forrester says AI agents could finally make micropayments work

AI agents may finally make micropayments viable, according to a new analysis from Forrester, which points to Stripe’s Machine Payments Protocol (MPP) as an early example of the trend.

Forrester analyst Meng Liu said micropayments have historically struggled due to user friction, as consumers are reluctant to repeatedly approve small transactions worth just a few cents or dollars. AI agents change that dynamic by executing payments automatically as part of completing tasks, removing the need for user interaction at checkout.

Stripe’s MPP is designed as a coordination layer that works across existing payment systems rather than a standalone network. Forrester’s Liu views this as a sign that infrastructure is emerging to support machine-to-machine transactions without requiring entirely new rails.

Liu said agent-driven payments could enable new business models, including pay-per-use services and automated digital commerce, while increasing demand for low-cost, high-frequency payment solutions such as stablecoins.

Liu said previous attempts to make micropayments viable have all failed. Source: Forrester

Crypto Biz is your weekly pulse on the business behind blockchain and crypto, delivered directly to your inbox every Thursday.