Connect with us

Crypto World

Ethereum address poisoning spike, ‘wallets aren’t ready’ says researcher

Published

on

Ethereum address poisoning spike, ‘wallets aren’t ready’ says researcher

On December 3, the Ethereum network executed the Fusaka upgrade which had one focus: “scaling without compromise.”

Gas fees, once a major impediment to Ethereum’s usability for all but those with the deepest of pockets, plummeted sharply, with transfers and swaps costing just a few cents per transaction.

Cheap transactions don’t just benefit regular users, however. 

Indeed, the increased affordability of long-running address poisoning campaigns has seen losses, as well as activity, skyrocket since Fusaka.

Advertisement

Protos spoke to Andrey Sergeenkov, an independent researcher analysing address poisoning on Ethereum, who believes that “the wallets aren’t ready, and the protocol keeps scaling anyway.”

Cheap gas, a boon for users and scammers alike

In an article published last month, Sergeenkov identified a six-fold reduction in gas costs resulting in an almost identical increase in the volume of address poisoning, from an average of 30,000 to 167,000 per day (5.6x).

Increased affordability has seen losses, as well as activity, skyrocket since Fusaka.

The surge in transactions has, unsurprisingly, been accompanied by increased losses.

Sergeenkov tracked dust transactions of 101 tokens and identified “confirmed payoffs” over 73-day windows before and after Fusaka.

The value of funds stolen increased from $4.9 million pre-Fukasa to $63.3 million in the period after the upgrade.

Advertisement

He also observed a “2.6-fold increase in [the number of] successful payoff events.”

Even subtracting the largest post-Fusaka loss, a $50 million outlier just before Christmas, the total is “still $13.3M, a 2.7-fold increase over the pre-Fusaka rate.”

Sergeenkov told Protos that, since the end of the dataset used in his most recent article, there have been a number of significant losses. The top three of these were a $600,000 loss on February 17, a $157,000 loss the following day, a $30,000 loss on February 28.

In all, he identified almost $900,000 in losses from 91 victims between those discussed in his article and his response to Protos on March 9.

Advertisement

Adjusting for the recent losses, and ignoring the outlier, brings the average amount stolen per day to 2.1x that of the pre-Fusaka rate. 

“The attack volume hasn’t slowed either,” he says, and is still picking up “200,000–350,000 poisoning transactions per day.”

While the individual transactions themselves may be cheap, the potential rewards justify splashing large sums on casting as wide a net as possible.

Read more: Copy, Paste, Rekt: Ethereum address poisoning strikes again

Advertisement

‘Scaling without compromise’

Ethereum’s efforts to reduce gas costs have been overwhelmingly successful.

First, demand was pushed onto cheaper, faster Layer Two (L2) networks, lowering activity on mainnet.

Though the advances in scaling (which don’t look to be slowing down) mean, in the words of Vitalik Buterin, that the “original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense.”

Later, the introductions of blobs (which did away with the ETH’s deflationary, “ultra sound” narrative) and the Fusaka upgrade, have seen the cost of gas mimic the chart of a classic DeFi slow-rug project.

Advertisement

Read more: Your L2 transaction fees are higher because of MEV spam, report

Sergeenkov notes that, despite a known link between low fees and attack volume, the upgrade “went ahead anyway.”

He says the “Ethereum Foundation has not proposed or implemented any protocol-level countermeasure” and Buterin “places user protection entirely at the wallet and UX layer.”

However, Sergeenkov points to research which claims that, of 53 wallets studied, only three “throw an explicit warning message” to users before transferring to address poisoning addresses.

Advertisement

According to Namefi CEO, Z. Victor Zhou, one potential solution is using leading zeros, making lookalike addresses much more costly and time-consuming for attackers to generate.

“One minute of your laptop’s GPU time creates an address that would cost an attacker 32 years to fake,” he claims. “The asymmetry is staggering.”

Emergent threats

Address poisoning isn’t the only attack vector which benefits from low gas costs.

Security researcher Daniel Von Fange notes that cheap gas makes for complex attack transactions which render “only the tiniest smidge of money” profitable.

Advertisement

“Spectacularly wasteful” MEV activity was seen to offset scaling improvements on L2 networks, negating any gas savings for regular users while looking to profit off their activity.

Other malicious behaviours can also be borne out of well-meaning upgrades.

“The system produces new attack vectors structurally, with each change to the protocol,” Sergeenkov says.

One example is EIP-7702, which brought wallet delegation capability. Wintermute research later found that 80% of addresses using the code were linked to malicious activity.

Advertisement

Does Sergeenkov have an antidote?

In terms of staying safe, Sergeenkov says “never copy addresses from your transaction history or a block explorer.” He also advises against making transfers if suffering from “lack of sleep, illness or anything else.”

But he has little faith that advice or educating users will be able to keep up with such “numerous and easily adaptable” attack vectors.

“What’s needed is a fundamentally different environment where users don’t have to learn how to avoid losing all their money from a single mistake. Where the risk-reward of an attack rules it out by itself.”

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

DeepSnitch AI Price Prediction: Dune Gives You Queries, Nansen Gives You Flows; DeepSnitch AI the 1000x Bet if Traders Want the Full Stack in One Place

Published

on

DeepSnitch AI Price Prediction: Dune Gives You Queries, Nansen Gives You Flows; DeepSnitch AI the 1000x Bet if Traders Want the Full Stack in One Place

Crypto just entered America’s retirement accounts, and $10 trillion in long-term capital is now in play. VanEck’s move to embed digital-asset ETPs in 401(k) plans isn’t a headline to scroll past.

Retirement capital is slow, sticky, and recurring, exactly the demand that builds durable price floors over years. With a Trump executive order clearing the regulatory path, this is the opening of a pipeline that could dwarf every ETF inflow record set so far.

But 401(k) exposure to crypto ETPs won’t deliver 100x returns. It’s designed to preserve and grow capital slowly at scale. That’s the institutional trade. The early-stage trade looks different.

DeepSnitch AI has already surged 191% in presale and has a TGE confirmed for March 31st on Uniswap.

Advertisement

As VanEck raises the floor across the board, the highest leverage sits in what that capital hasn’t priced in yet. DSNT is still that asset, and the DeepSnitch AI price prediction looks at 100x returns from now.

VanEck brings crypto ETFs to 401(k) plans

VanEck has made its digital asset ETPs available through Basic Capital, a fintech 401(k) provider, marking one of the first moves to embed crypto-focused products directly into US employer-sponsored retirement accounts.

The development follows a Trump executive order directing federal agencies to expand alternative asset access in 401(k) plans, reversing prior Labor Department guidance that had effectively blocked crypto from retirement accounts.

The scale of the opportunity is substantial. US 401(k) plans hold roughly $10 trillion in assets, and with nearly half of participants increasing contributions in 2024, the pool of potential crypto exposure is enormous.

Advertisement

For crypto markets, this is a structural demand story. Retirement capital is long-term, recurring, and largely passive, precisely the inflow that could provide a durable bid beneath crypto prices over years, not months.

Top 3 cryptocurrencies to own in 2026

DeepSnitch AI price prediction: Analysts expect 100x returns

Here’s what the DeepSnitch AI price prediction case actually rests on. VanEck’s 401(k) integration means retirement capital starts flowing into crypto consistently, as a recurring structural bid.

That raises the floor for the entire market over the years. The assets that benefit most from a rising floor are the ones positioned to catch the demand before it arrives. DeepSnitch AI is at $0.04399 with the TGE on March 31st. Early buyers are already up 191% without a single exchange candle printed.

The 100x–300x post-launch DeepSnitch AI price predictions, with some analysts calling 1,000x before year-end, are grounded in a specific logic: a low-cap AI-native platform launching into a market where the total capital pool is structurally expanding. VanEck is opening the pipeline. DSNT goes live before that capital fully flows through it.

Advertisement

The staking program is live, with 42M+ tokens already locked, holders who’ve committed long-term rather than waiting to flip at listing.

Over $2M raised while most top altcoins, and even Bitcoin, bleed confirms the conviction is real. At this price, before the Uniswap listing and tier-1 CEX listings that follow, the entry is still genuinely early-stage. After March 31st, DeepSnitch AI isn’t.

Cardano trades below $0.3 while investors turn bullish

Cardano traded at $0.26 on March 11, up over 5% in three days and closing in on descending trendline resistance between $0.27 and $0.30.

Advertisement

The catalyst matters. Charles Hoskinson’s 2026 funding model proposes using treasury returns to buy ADA on the open market, a structural buyback mechanism that speculative momentum alone can’t replicate.

Derivatives tell a cautious story. Open Interest drops to $410 million. Funding rate flips positive to 0.0075%. Bulls return quietly, without conviction.

The chart sits in the same uncertain middle. ADA trades below the 50-day and 100-day EMAs near $0.29. RSI stays under 50. MACD fades near zero. Close above $0.29, and the recovery gains real traction. Lose $0.24, and this bounce unravels entirely.

Ethereum

Ethereum traded at $2,055 on March 11, holding above the 20-day EMA at $2,024. That level separates cautious optimism from renewed selling pressure.

Advertisement

What makes this setup unusual is the disconnect between network activity and price. Daily active addresses hit a record 2 million in February, double the 2021 bull market peak. Total contract calls surpassed 40 million daily. The network thrives. The price doesn’t.

ETH shed over 50% in four months. CryptoQuant analysts point to the mechanism: realized capitalization growth turned negative, and ETH exchange inflows outpace Bitcoin’s. Capital leaves while usage climbs.

Reclaim $2,108, and $2,389 comes next. Lose the 20-day EMA, and $1,741 arrives fast, with $1,524 and $1,405 waiting beneath it.

Closing thoughts

VanEck is routing retirement capital into crypto, building the structural floor that benefits the entire market over the years. Early DeepSnitch AI investors are already up 191%, without waiting for a 401(k) to do it for them.

Advertisement

The presale closes March 31st, with Uniswap and tier-1 exchange listings to follow. At $0.04399, the entry is still early-stage, with a massive DeepSnitch AI price prediction.

A $30,000 position with the bonus campaign enters launch day worth $90,000 in tokens, and if the 100x projections land, that math rewrites portfolios entirely.

Visit the official website for more information, and join X and Telegram for community updates.

FAQs

What is the DeepSnitch AI price target analysts are projecting ahead of its March 31st launch?

The DeepSnitch AI price predictions range from 100x to 300x post-launch, with some analysts projecting 1,000x before year-end. The case rests on a low-cap AI-native platform launching into a market where VanEck’s 401(k) integration is structurally expanding the total capital pool.

Advertisement

What does the DeepSnitch AI forecast look like heading into Q2 2026?

Bullish. As VanEck’s retirement capital pipeline opens and raises the market floor, the highest leverage sits in pre-listing assets that institutional money hasn’t yet priced in. DSNT is still that asset.

What is the DeepSnitch AI market outlook compared to Cardano and Ethereum right now?

Cardano’s buyback mechanism and Ethereum’s network strength are credible long-term stories. DeepSnitch AI’s March 31st TGE is a fixed, near-term catalyst at $0.04399 with uncapped staking yields and a post-launch price structure that neither large-cap asset can replicate.


Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

SEC chair backs “minimum effective dose” disclosure and targeted tokenization pilots

Published

on

SEC chair backs “minimum effective dose” disclosure and targeted tokenization pilots

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is signaling support for streamlined “minimum effective dose” disclosure rules and tightly scoped equity‑tokenization pilots via an innovation exemption, according to new remarks from Chair Paul S. Atkins.

Summary

  • Atkins calls for materiality‑focused, scaled disclosure and extending the JOBS Act “IPO on‑ramp” so smaller issuers face lighter reporting as they enter public markets.
  • He attacks “comply or explain” governance mandates as “shaming regulation,” arguing board structures and ESG metrics should be set by shareholders, not backdoor pressure.
  • On tokenization, he backs an “innovation exemption” that would cap volumes and scope but allow limited trading of tokenized securities to inform a longer‑term rule framework.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is signaling support for streamlined disclosure rules and controlled experiments with equity tokenization, according to a new speech by Chair Paul S. Atkins at the agency’s Investor Advisory Committee meeting.

SEC chair pushes “minimum effective dose” regulation

Atkins focused first on cutting what he called unnecessary disclosure burdens, arguing for a “minimum effective dose” approach to regulation that keeps rules tightly centered on material information and adapts requirements to company size. He also proposed extending the JOBS Act “IPO on‑ramp” regime, giving small and mid-size firms a longer glide path with scaled reporting so that more issuers are willing to go public.

Advertisement

Atkins sharply criticized the SEC’s use of “comply or explain” disclosure mandates in corporate governance, branding them a form of “shaming regulation” that effectively forces companies into preferred governance models by public pressure rather than law. In his view, decisions on board structure, ESG metrics, and related governance questions should remain in the hands of shareholders and directors, not be indirectly dictated through disclosure threats.

Green light for targeted tokenization exemptions

On tokenization, Atkins took a more openly experimental stance, arguing that turning equity securities into digital tokens can improve settlement efficiency, reduce settlement risk, and strip out unnecessary intermediaries. He revealed that the SEC is considering an “innovative exemption mechanism” to allow limited trading of specific tokenized securities, using tightly scoped pilots to build experience for a long-term regulatory framework.

That approach would effectively let tokenized equity projects move forward under controlled conditions, rather than waiting for a full top‑down rule overhaul. For crypto markets, the message is clear: the SEC is not ready to rewrite securities law for tokenization, but it is prepared to grant targeted exemptions that could bring regulated, on‑chain equity settlement closer to reality.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Anchorage Digital Integrates Puffer to Offer Institutional ETH Restaking

Published

on

Anchorage Digital Integrates Puffer to Offer Institutional ETH Restaking

Anchorage Digital has integrated with Puffer Finance to give institutional clients access to Ethereum liquid restaking through its custody platform.

According to Thursday’s announcement, institutions can stake Ether held with Anchorage and receive Puffer’s liquid restaking token, pufETH, directly into their accounts. The token represents a restaked ETH (ETH) position that can be transferred or deployed across supported onchain applications while continuing to earn staking and restaking rewards.

Institutions using the platform can participate in restaking without running validators or managing staking infrastructure themselves.

Advertisement

The integration allows clients to access Puffer’s restaking protocol while keeping assets within Anchorage’s custody and governance framework, avoiding the need to move funds across multiple platforms.

Anchorage said the integration is part of a broader effort to expand institutional access to onchain services through its platform, including staking, restaking, governance and settlement.

Anchorage Digital is a crypto custody company headquartered in San Francisco that operates the first federally chartered crypto bank in the United States.

In January, the company was reported to be seeking between $200 million and $400 million in new funding as it explores a potential initial public offering sometime next year.

Advertisement

Related: Sharplink reports $735M loss in 2025 as Ethereum slumped

Liquid restaking expands across Ethereum ecosystem

Restaking has emerged as a new layer of activity in proof-of-stake networks such as Ether, allowing already staked tokens to be reused to secure additional decentralized services while generating additional rewards.

In liquid restaking systems, staked Ether is represented by a tradable token that can be reused through restaking protocols to help secure additional decentralized services.

Much of the restaking ecosystem has developed around EigenLayer, a protocol launched by Eigen Labs that enables staked Ether or liquid staking tokens to secure additional onchain services beyond the Ethereum network.

Advertisement

Over the past few years, liquid restaking has grown into a multibillion-dollar sector within the Ethereum ecosystem. According to data from DefiLlama, protocols offering liquid restaking collectively hold about $7.2 billion in total value locked (TVL).

Liquid restaking on Ethereum. Source: Defillama

The sector is dominated by ether.fi with around $5.6 billion in TVL, followed by Kelp DAO with about $1 billion and Renzo with roughly $217 million. Puffer Finance, the protocol integrated by Anchorage Digital, currently manages around $62 million in restaked Ether.

Ethereum treasury companies are also increasingly exploring these strategies to generate yield from their Ether holdings. In October, SharpLink Gaming said it planned to deploy $200 million worth of Ether from its corporate treasury across staking and restaking strategies through ether.fi and EigenCloud on Linea.

Magazine: What’s a ‘Network State’ and are there real-life examples? Big Questions