Crypto World
Ethplorer’s Aleksandr Vat Says Ethereum’s Altseason Already Happened
At Paris Blockchain Week, BeInCrypto sat down for an exclusive interview with Aleksandr Vat, Head of Business Development at Ethplorer.io, to discuss the company’s new Aggregated Ethereum Rich List.
Ethplorer argues that traditional Ethereum rich lists have become increasingly misleading because they rank wallets by ETH holdings alone. Its new ranking looks at the total USD value held by each address, including ETH, ERC-20 tokens, and stablecoins.
Photo provided by Aleksandr Vat
According to Vat, this changes the picture of Ethereum wealth, liquidity, and risk. It also leads to one of Ethplorer’s more provocative conclusions: altseason may have already happened, but in balance sheets rather than price charts.
Ethereum’s Rich List Has Changed
BeInCrypto: At the conference, you discussed the new Ethereum ranking with the community. What is the Aggregated Ethereum Rich List, and why did Ethplorer build it?
Aleksandr Vat: Ethplorer rebuilt the Ethereum rich list by ranking addresses not only by ETH, but by total USD value. That includes ETH, ERC-20 tokens, and stablecoins.
The Aggregated Ranking of Ethereum addresses is based on totalBalanceUsd, unlike traditional rankings, which are sorted by ethBalanceUsd. The goal was simple. ETH-only rankings no longer show real economic power on Ethereum.
BeInCrypto: What was fundamentally wrong with traditional ETH-based rankings?
Aleksandr Vat: ETH-only rankings ignore most of the capital. Today, around 66% of value sits outside ETH, mostly in tokens and stablecoins. That means ETH-based lists give a distorted view of who controls liquidity and risk.
BeInCrypto: What was the biggest insight when you first rebuilt the ranking?
Aleksandr Vat: The biggest change was that the entire hierarchy changed. The same top 10,000 addresses hold almost three times more capital when tokens are included. Many players that were previously almost invisible suddenly become dominant.
Ethereum Is Becoming Entity-Centric
BeInCrypto: Vitalik Buterin envisioned Ethereum as a platform where code manages value. Has that vision been realized?
Aleksandr Vat: Increasingly, it is systems rather than individuals. Smart contracts, exchanges, and liquidity hubs now control a large share of capital. Ethereum has become less whale-centric and more entity-centric.
What is important is that we can now measure it. In ETH-based rankings, this change was almost invisible. Once we look at aggregated balances, it becomes clear that a large share of capital is already controlled by smart contracts, DeFi protocols, bridges, and liquidity pools. Roughly 28% of total capital is now controlled by these systems.
So this is no longer only a vision. It is an observable structural reality.
“Altseason Already Happened”
BeInCrypto: You say that “altseason already happened.” What do you mean by that?
Aleksandr Vat: Altseason did not disappear. It moved from price charts to balance sheets.
Through most of 2017–2021, ETH represented the majority of Ethereum’s economic value, while tokens and stablecoins played secondary roles.
That structure has since changed. By 2022–2023, token-denominated balances had matched ETH in economic weight.
In Ethereum’s Aggregated Rating 2026, ETH no longer dominates portfolios. The top 10,000 addresses held about $342 billion in total value at the end of March 2026. Of this amount, $116.5 billion was held in ETH, equal to roughly 34%, while the remaining 66% was denominated in tokens.
BeInCrypto: Why did the market miss this?
Aleksandr Vat: Because people watch prices, not balance composition. While charts were flat, capital was quietly redistributing across tokens, stablecoins, and smart contracts.
BeInCrypto: Are we looking at a different kind of market cycle now?
Aleksandr Vat: Yes. The market is going from price discovery to power discovery. The key question is less “What is the price?” and more “Who controls liquidity and risk?”
What This Means for Investors and Analysts
BeInCrypto: What does this give investors in practice?
Aleksandr Vat: It changes how you evaluate risk. Instead of focusing only on price or market cap, you look at what a balance consists of. Is it real external capital, or is it self-issued tokens?
BeInCrypto: How should analysts rethink their approach using this data?
Aleksandr Vat: Analysts need to move from narratives to composition analysis. That means looking at aggregated balances, capital sources, and dependencies, rather than only TVL or token price.
BeInCrypto: Does this change how we should interpret TVL and market cap?
Aleksandr Vat: Yes. Both metrics can be distorted by self-issued tokens. Without understanding balance composition, you can overestimate real economic strength.
The Printing-Press Index
BeInCrypto: What is the Printing-Press Index, and why did you introduce it?
Aleksandr Vat: The Printing-Press Index, or PPI, measures how much of a portfolio consists of a project’s own token. It helps separate real capital from internally generated value.
The formula is simple:
PPI equals the USD value of a project’s own tokens divided by the total USD value of tokens held by the project. In other words, it shows the share of a project’s own token in its portfolio.
BeInCrypto: What did PPI reveal about DeFi, centralized exchanges, bridges, and Layer 2 networks?
Aleksandr Vat: DeFi shows significantly higher reliance on self-issued tokens compared with centralized players. On average, it is around twice as high, 14.7% versus 6.9%.
Bridges and Layer 2s show even higher PPI, around 34.8%. Part of this is structural because they often require native tokens for liquidity and staking. But this also transfers risk toward token price dependency.
BeInCrypto: At what point does PPI become risky?
Aleksandr Vat: Below roughly 20%, it is normal. Above 40% to 50%, the system becomes fragile and exposed to reflexive collapse dynamics.
BeInCrypto: Can you give real-world examples of high PPI risk?
Aleksandr Vat: UST-LUNA is the extreme case. The system was almost entirely backed by its own token, which led to a death spiral.
FTX is another example. Even around 40% exposure to FTT was enough to trigger collapse under stress. That shows high PPI does not need to be extreme to become dangerous.
ETH Is Still Important, But It Is No Longer the Whole Story
BeInCrypto: Does ETH still represent the core of Ethereum’s economy?
Aleksandr Vat: ETH is still important, but it is no longer the dominant store of value within large portfolios. Only around 34% of top-holder capital is in ETH. The other 66% sits outside ETH, in tokens.
BeInCrypto: What surprised you most in terms of address dynamics?
Aleksandr Vat: The generational change. Most large addresses in the Aggregated Ranking are significantly newer, which reflects capital entering through DeFi and tokens.
In the ETH top ranking, about one-third of wallets are more than five years old. In the Aggregated Ranking, almost 60% are under two years old.
Aggregated addresses are also about 25% more active. They show larger balance changes and higher volatility because they reflect real liquidity flows, rather than passive ETH holding.
Filtering Out Fake Token Wealth
BeInCrypto: How do you deal with fake or inflated token balances?
Aleksandr Vat: We apply liquidity filters. That means excluding balances that cannot realistically be sold without moving the market.
Without filtering, low-liquidity tokens can artificially inflate rankings and misrepresent real economic power. In crypto, it is relatively easy to mint a token, assign it a price through thin trading, and create the illusion of large balances.
To address this, we use a set of validation checks. We look at minimum trading activity, both current and historical. We validate market capitalization consistency and assess whether a balance could realistically be liquidated in the market.
The logic is simple. If you cannot realistically sell your full position within about two weeks, that balance does not represent real liquid capital and should not distort the ranking.
The Beacon Deposit Contract Problem
BeInCrypto: Before this interview, we looked at traditional Ethereum rich lists from well-known platforms. One thing immediately stood out. The Beacon Deposit Contract appears to hold nearly 70% of the Ethereum network. Are we really analyzing the behavior of only the remaining 30% of the market?
Aleksandr Vat: That is exactly the problem with ETH-only rankings. They create a misleading picture.
The Beacon contract is not a real holder. It is a technical deposit registry for staking. The ETH there is not controlled by a single entity and cannot even be withdrawn from that address.
So when it shows up as “70% of the market,” around 83 million ETH, it does not reflect real economic power or market behavior. It is a technical figure.
If you look at the real picture, active staking is closer to 39 million ETH. When we move to an aggregated view, including liquid tokens and stablecoins, active staking accounts for just over 10% of total ecosystem capital.
So we are not analyzing only 30% of the market. Roughly 10% sits in staking. The other 90% is where the market actually operates, where capital moves, trades, and redistributes across the ecosystem.
Building the Ranking
BeInCrypto: How long did it take to develop this ranking?
Aleksandr Vat: There is no single timeline because this was not built as a standalone project. Ethplorer has spent years processing token-level data, focusing on USD valuation and filtering out low-quality assets.
At some point, the data quality and coverage reached a level where building a full aggregated ranking became possible. That is when we turned it into a structured product.
BeInCrypto: What was the hardest part?
Aleksandr Vat: Cleaning the data, especially handling spam tokens, price inconsistencies, and entity aggregation.
BeInCrypto: What kind of feedback have you received from the community?
Aleksandr Vat: Strong interest and debate, especially because the ranking challenges widely accepted assumptions about Ethereum.
BeInCrypto: Have you discussed this with industry players at Paris Blockchain Week?
Aleksandr Vat: Yes, and reactions were mixed, from curiosity to skepticism. That is expected when you introduce a new analytical approach.
Final Takeaway
BeInCrypto: What is the main takeaway from your research?
Aleksandr Vat: Ethereum’s rich list is no longer about wealth. It is about capital flows and risk distribution.
BeInCrypto: If you had to summarize the change in one sentence?Aleksandr Vat: We went from tracking balances to understanding capital structure.
The post Ethplorer’s Aleksandr Vat Says Ethereum’s Altseason Already Happened appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Hits Fresh $50K Target After 6% One-Day Decline
Bitcoin continued its retreat on Wednesday as U.S. market activity began, slipping below $67,000 and printing as low as $66,948 on Bitstamp, its weakest level since early April. Across the crypto market, liquidations intensified, with 24-hour cross-asset liquidations approaching $1.25 billion, signaling a broad deleveraging pulse that erased months of gains.
Despite the move, traditional equities painted a contrary picture. The S&P 500 logged another record, highlighting a grim divergence between Bitcoin and broader risk assets as macro dynamics and liquidity considerations took center stage.
Analysts framed the price action as part of a familiar bear-flag narrative that has characterized prior downswings in this cycle. On X, trader Rekt Capital noted that macro risk-off behavior has investors shifting toward stablecoins, even as Bitcoin tests critical technical levels. Kalshi’s markets also reflected downside bets, with participants pricing in a potential retest of lower price bands. Meanwhile, voices in the community pointed to a crowded open interest backdrop that could amplify further moves if selling pressure persists.
Key takeaways
- Bitcoin dips below $67,000 and trades as low as $66,948 on Bitstamp, its lowest since early April.
- 24-hour liquidations total around $1.25 billion, underscoring a broad deleveraging across crypto markets.
- Bitcoin’s price action is viewed by some as a return to a bear-flag breakdown, suggesting further downside if supports fail.
- Analysts highlight a potential test of the 50-month exponential moving average near $66,250 as a key near-term target or pivot.
- Market positioning shows rising open interest and downside bets, with Kalshi pricing in risk of a deeper pullback and traders noting a split between crypto and stock market strength.
Bear-flag mechanics and key technicals
From a technical standpoint, BTC/USD has been revisiting the negative-pattern dynamics that defined earlier phases of the bear market. CollinTalksCrypto, a creator known for tracking chart-driven narratives, argued that the move mirrors a bear-flag breakdown rather than a unique pivot, reinforcing the notion that Bitcoin is in a broader corrective phase rather than signaling an imminent reversal. The argument centers on a flag-like consolidation that fails to sustain bullish momentum, followed by renewed downside pressure when support gives way.
The price dipped to roughly $66,948 on Bitstamp, an imprint that reopens discussion about how much weakness remains before a more decisive bounce—or a further breakdown. Traders watching the chart also note that such patterns often require patience, as relief rallies can be brief and quickly reabsorbed in a bear-market context.
Adding to the near-term complexity, analyst Rekt Capital highlighted the potential test of the 50-month exponential moving average around $66,250. He cautioned that even if a shallow bounce materializes on contact, the long-term trajectory could remain skewed to the downside if Bitcoin fails to establish a clear base above that EMA.
Positioning, open interest, and the macro backdrop
The sell-off comes amid a broader liquidity mosaic. Data suggest that a surge in open interest paired with elevated spot selling could sustain downward pressure, particularly if bitcoin breaks key supports. In parallel, market commentary from Kalshi signals bets around $50,000 as a plausible downside scenario, reinforcing the sense that participants are bracing for a range of outcomes in the near term.
On social channels, observers noted a paradox: while risk assets like the S&P 500 have continued to push higher, bitcoin has been softening, a dynamic described as a “grim divergence” by some traders. The disconnect has fed discussions about where crypto fits within macro portfolios and whether BTC will decouple from equity strength or remain tethered to the prevailing risk-off environment.
“Investors are macro risk-off, fleeing into stablecoins and moving away from Bitcoin,” remarked trader Rekt Capital, highlighting the flow shift amid ongoing macro uncertainty.
Critically, some observers pointed to the possibility that a wave of open interest could intensify any subsequent move. Exitpump, a market observer on X, warned that record open interest has contributed to an “insane amount of spot selling,” increasing the risk of a sharp downward leg if liquidity supplies dwindle. A fellow analyst, Exitpump, echoed the sentiment, suggesting the downside could extend into the low 60s or even the mid-50s if selling accelerates and buyers retreat from the market.
What to watch next
Looking ahead, traders will be focused on whether BTC can establish a foothold above the key mid-60k zone and how quickly volatility responds to incoming liquidity cues. The interaction between price, open interest, and order-book depth will likely shape the near-term path, with the 66,250–66,500 region serving as a critical test for the bears’ control. If BTC sustains a move back above the 50-month EMA, a cautious, data-driven bounce could materialize; otherwise, the path of least resistance may remain toward the lower-$60k territory in the near term.
Readers should monitor how Kalshi’s downside scenarios evolve, how open interest shifts in the coming sessions, and whether any macro catalysts—ranging from central-bank signaling to liquidity shifts—alter the balance between risk-on optimism and risk-off caution in digital assets.
Bitcoin’s latest leg down reinforces the notion that the bear market still dominates price action, but the exact trajectory remains uncertain. As always, traders are urged to weigh risk carefully, diversify exposures, and follow developments that could alter the prevailing technical and macro narrative.
Crypto World
Strive Expands Bitcoin Treasury With Fresh $185 Million BTC Buy
Strive expanded its Bitcoin treasury again after buying 2,500 BTC for about $185.2 million this week. The purchase lifted its total holdings to 19,000 BTC and strengthened its corporate Bitcoin position. The move also came as the firm increased capital plans through its ASST and SATA programs.
Strive Adds 2,500 Bitcoin to Its Treasury
Strive bought the latest Bitcoin batch at an average price of about $74,092 per coin. The firm disclosed the acquisition after its chief executive, Matthew Cole, shared the update on Tuesday. The purchase added fresh scale to a treasury strategy built around steady Bitcoin accumulation.
The latest transaction followed another recent purchase of 1,109 BTC for roughly $85.4 million. That earlier deal carried an average purchase price near $76,988 per Bitcoin. Therefore, the new acquisition came at a lower average cost than the prior disclosed purchase.
Strive now holds 19,000 BTC, according to the latest company update and treasury tracking data. The firm also reported a quarterly Bitcoin yield of 23% and a year-to-date yield of 36.7%. In addition, Cole said Strive raised its cash position and maintained an 18-month dividend reserve.
Bitcoin Strategy Expands Through ASST and SATA
The Bitcoin purchase came after Strive outlined plans to expand its fundraising capacity. Cole said the company expects to increase both ASST and SATA at-the-market programs by $2.1 billion each. As a result, the two programs could add $4.2 billion in combined capital capacity.
The expanded programs would give Strive more room to fund future Bitcoin purchases. It would also support its broader balance sheet strategy as demand for both securities rises. However, the company has not confirmed the exact use of every future fundraising dollar.
Data from Bitcoin Treasuries showed that Strive’s SATA raised about $194.3 million during the past week. That figure sits near the value of the newly disclosed Bitcoin purchase. Therefore, the timing suggests the recent capital raise may have supported the latest reserve expansion.
Corporate Bitcoin Market Shows a Sharp Contrast
Strive’s new purchase arrived as Strategy reported a rare reduction in its Bitcoin holdings. A Monday filing showed Strategy sold about $2.5 million worth of Bitcoin during the past week. The sale drew market attention because Strategy remains the largest corporate Bitcoin holder.
Strategy also focused earlier on repurchasing $1.5 billion in convertible notes instead of adding more Bitcoin. That action marked a different capital approach from Strive’s continued accumulation plan. Meanwhile, Michael Saylor reacted to Strive’s update and kept the focus on corporate Bitcoin adoption.
The contrast shows how public companies now manage Bitcoin exposure through different treasury decisions. Strive continues to raise capital and increase its BTC reserve during market weakness. Strategy, however, has recently balanced its treasury activity with debt and limited Bitcoin sales.
Background Behind Strive’s Bitcoin Buildout
Strive has positioned Bitcoin as a central part of its corporate asset strategy. The firm has used equity programs and treasury metrics to frame its balance sheet expansion. This approach mirrors a wider trend among companies using Bitcoin as a reserve asset.
Corporate Bitcoin holders often use market pullbacks to expand their reserves at lower average prices. Strive’s latest purchase fits that pattern because it followed a weaker Bitcoin trading period. The firm also bought below the average price of its previous disclosed acquisition.
The company’s growing Bitcoin reserve now places it among the larger public corporate holders. Its next moves may depend on liquidity, capital access, and Bitcoin market conditions. For now, Strive has reinforced its position as an active Bitcoin treasury firm.
Crypto World
Cardano’s TapTools Winds Down After Losing 5 Execs
TapTools, a Cardano-focused real-time analytics platform, has begun winding down after its fifth top-level executive departure, compounding leadership instability and making continued operations unsustainable.
TapTools said in a post to X on Tuesday that it would begin winding down over the next two weeks, and noted the departure of its two co-founders, chief operating officer and chief technology officer earlier this year.
“We worked hard to adapt,” TapTools said, adding that its backend developer had become its CTO as the platform shifted its focus toward shipping products more sustainably; however, they have since departed, and “the technical knowledge required to responsibly operate and maintain TapTools cannot be replaced overnight.”

Source: TapTools
TapTools launched in 2022 and became one of the most widely used tools for Cardano users to track token prices, decentralized finance activity and discover new projects.
The wind-down follows a similar move by Cardano-based nonfungible token marketplace, JPG.Store, which permanently shut down on May 23.
TapTools’ closure comes three days after the Cardano Foundation said its annual conference was cancelled this year after its governance community shot down a revised proposal seeking to fund the event with treasury tokens.
TapTools said the economics of running the platform were another key factor in its decision to wind down.
“Infrastructure costs are real. Development costs are real. Support costs are real. Operating a platform that serves the ecosystem at scale is expensive.”
Related: Cardano can now be used to pay at 137 Spar stores across Switzerland
TapTools said it remains open to acquisition or external funding to sustain operations.
Cardano creator expects more protocol wind-downs
Cardano creator Charles Hoskinson took some of the blame for TapTools’ wind-down, saying in a video shared to X that he expected a lot of protocols to collapse in the current bear market and that he came up with a plan to “bail out” struggling projects.
“I came up with the plan of an index. It did not get executed,” Hoskinson said.
Hoskinson added that Cardano’s governance community could have helped some of these projects, but opted not to.
Magazine: Big Questions: Do we really only need 2–5 cryptocurrencies?
Crypto World
Peter Schiff Predicts a Brutal Bitcoin Crash to $20,000 and Sparks Heated Backlash
Peter Schiff predicted Bitcoin would break below $50,000 and then quickly plunge under $20,000, sparking a strong wave of pushback across the entire crypto community on X.
We break down what Schiff actually said, the market context behind his call, and how Bitcoiners fired back at the veteran gold advocate.
Why Peter Schiff Is Predicting a Bitcoin Crash
Peter Schiff is the chief of Euro Pacific Capital and one of the longest-running Bitcoin skeptics in finance. He took to X on Tuesday to argue that excessive complacency signals the crypto market remains far from a bottom right now.
“When Bitcoin breaks $50K, it should be a quick fall below $20K,” Schiff wrote, claiming such a move would finally break the resolve of long-term Bitcoin holders across the world.
The prediction came as Bitcoin was trading at $66,670 after falling below the key $70,000 support, accumulating a daily drop of 6.4%. This correction coincided with Mt. Gox transferring approximately 10,422 BTC to new wallets as part of payments to creditors.
A modest sale by Strategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, added some caution to the picture. The amount represented a tiny fraction of holdings, but the symbolism arrived during an already fragile sentiment phase across crypto.
Schiff’s broader argument remains the same. He has long claimed Bitcoin lacks intrinsic value compared to gold, and views the current cycle as another speculative excess waiting for an eventual reckoning across markets.
How the Bitcoin Community Hit Back
Bitcoiners responded with characteristic bluntness, pointing directly to Schiff’s long history of bearish calls. Many noted he has been questioning Bitcoin’s viability since the asset traded in the low thousands, more than a decade ago.
“Peter schiff has been calling bitcoin dead since $1K and he’s still out here writing the same post with different numbers in it,” one user replied, capturing the dominant mood across the community.
Others focused on conviction rather than price. “What Peter refuses to understand is that $20,000 wouldn’t shake a single HODLer,” wrote another user, framing Bitcoin as a censorship-resistant monetary network rather than a speculative bet.
“Yes, people buy for NGU. But the actual use case is a decentralized, censorship-resistant monetary network. That doesn’t change at any price. That’s what gives it value. And in a world where stablecoins hand governments an easier path to overreach, that value only goes up”, added.
The discussion reflects a deeper cultural divide between traditional precious-metals proponents and Bitcoin maximalists. Community replies ranged from memes and old call compilations to declarations of continued accumulation on every notable dip.
Market participants now watch key technical levels, with stronger demand between $64,000 and $66,000, while Bitcoin still trades 47% below its all-time high near $126,000 from late 2025.
For now, the market reaction to Schiff’s prediction looks limited to social media skirmishes. Bitcoin holders largely dismissed the call, and many framed any deeper drop as a buying opportunity rather than fuel for capitulation.
The post Peter Schiff Predicts a Brutal Bitcoin Crash to $20,000 and Sparks Heated Backlash appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
NewLimit Series C: Armstrong-Backed Longevity Startup Raises $435M
TLDR:
- NewLimit Series C raised $435M led by Founders Fund for longevity biotech expansion and clinical readiness.
- Startup targets epigenetic reprogramming therapies aimed at restoring youthful function in aged human cells.
- First-in-human trials for lead liver cell program are planned for next year after recent breakthrough results.
- Funding brings major VC backing as NewLimit scales research toward regulated human clinical applications.
NewLimit Series C funding has closed at $435 million, marking a major capital injection into longevity biotech. The round was led by Founders Fund with participation from several new and returning investors.
The company was co-founded by Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and focuses on cellular age reprogramming. NewLimit now prepares to advance its first human trials for age-related therapies next year.
NewLimit Series C Funding Backed by Founders Fund and Global Investors
NewLimit Series C attracted strong backing from high-profile venture firms. Founders Fund led the round with a $435 million commitment.
Thrive Capital, Greenoaks, and Quiet Capital joined as new investors. Existing backers also increased exposure to the biotech startup.
Kleiner Perkins and Eli Lilly Ventures returned alongside other participants. Wu Blockchain reported the funding details alongside NewLimit’s announcement.
NewLimit confirmed continued collaboration with Abstract VC, NFDG, and Valor. The company said investor support strengthens its research timeline.
NewLimit Series C positions the firm deeper into longevity biotech development. The company builds therapies that target cellular aging mechanisms.
It focuses on epigenetic reprogramming to restore function in aged cells. Early research concentrates on human liver cell regeneration programs.
Data shared by NewLimit indicates progress in preclinical validation stages. The firm aims to translate findings into clinical applications.
The funding round expands operational capacity for research and development. It also supports preparation for regulated clinical environments.
NewLimit Series C Advances Human Trials for Epigenetic Reprogramming
NewLimit Series C funding supports a clear shift toward human testing. The company plans first-in-human trials for next year.
The lead program targets reprogramming aged human cells into more youthful states. Researchers focus on restoring functional biological activity at the cellular level.
NewLimit stated that breakthrough results enabled the transition into clinical readiness. The firm continues refining its therapeutic approach for safety and efficacy.
The company uses epigenetic reprogramming as its central scientific method. This approach seeks to reset cellular age markers without altering DNA sequences.
NewLimit’s research model integrates biotech and advanced computational biology methods. Teams analyze cellular behavior changes under reprogramming conditions.
The startup builds its pipeline around longevity medicine applications. It prioritizes therapies aimed at age-related decline and organ function loss.
According to company updates, liver cell rejuvenation remains the first clinical target. Additional indications may follow after initial trial outcomes.
The funding strengthens infrastructure for scaling laboratory and clinical operations. It also accelerates regulatory preparation for upcoming trials.
Crypto World
Crypto Turns Contrarian Bet as AI Stocks Dominate
Crypto is turning into a “contrarian bet” as institutional investors are being drawn to artificial intelligence stocks, says Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan.
“The crypto market is brutal right now,” Hougan wrote in a market note on Tuesday. “One major reason is that crypto is no longer the belle of the ball. AI stocks, robotics companies, SpaceX … who needs crypto when the Nasdaq-100 is up 43% year-over-year?”
“With AI sucking all the oxygen out of the room, crypto is being forced to go through a painful metamorphosis: from momentum trade to contrarian bet.”
Stocks linked to companies involved in AI have skyrocketed as the technology has captured investor attention after OpenAI launched ChatGPT to the public in late 2022. Shares in Nvidia, which makes computing components key to AI, have gained nearly 1,500% since ChatGPT’s launch.
Hougan argued that contrarian bets can be great investments, but their payoff pattern is “usually spotty.”
“Momentum investments are fun. They surf along waves of excitement. Contrarian bets, by comparison, are a grind, requiring patience, a long-term orientation, and a focus on fundamentals,” he added.
“Investors still believe in crypto, but now that it’s a contrarian bet, they favor fundamentals over vibes.”
LVRG Research director Nick Ruck told Cointelegraph that while AI continues to dominate institutional portfolios, “crypto is quietly emerging as the true contrarian bet for sophisticated investors seeking directional upside in a maturing market.”
“This shift away from hype toward fundamentals is being fueled by real adoption metrics, regulatory clarity, and on-chain utility rather than speculative bets.”
Related: Bitcoin losses by holder cohort hit new highs: Will traders defend $60K?
Hougan said that this bear market is different because, unlike past crypto cycles where Bitcoin was the safe haven, money is moving into smaller assets with strong fundamentals such as Hyperliquid, Zcash and Stellar.
This is how the contrarian bet is playing out, he said. “When crypto stops being a momentum trade, fundamentals start to matter — and this rotation is proof it’s already underway.”
Hougan also argued that it is a sign that we are closer to the end of the bear market than the beginning.
“In the heart of a crypto winter, everything’s red. When the green starts to look like real growth, the season is changing.”
That bear market end seems a long way off at the moment, with markets dumping a further 5.3% on the day, sending total market capitalization down to $2.38 trillion, 46% below its October peak.

Total crypto capitalization tanks to a two-month low. Source: TradingView
Magazine: Big Questions: Do we really only need 2–5 cryptocurrencies?
Crypto World
Crypto exchanges face tough Brazil test as audit mandate arrives
Brazil’s central bank has added mandatory independent audits to the licensing approval process for crypto service providers in the country.
Summary
- Brazil’s central bank will require crypto service providers to submit independent audit reports when applying for or renewing licenses.
- The audits will review anti-money laundering controls, customer asset segregation, risk management systems, and employee compliance programs.
- The new rule could raise compliance costs for smaller crypto firms, while major exchanges may continue pursuing access to Brazil’s large market.
According to the published rules cited in the report, crypto firms applying for authorization, or renewing an existing license, must submit an independent auditor’s report as part of their regulatory filing. The rules state that the audit must be carried out by professionals registered with Brazil’s securities regulator, the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários.
Brazil adds audit requirement for crypto licenses
Under the new requirement, auditors will review whether crypto service providers have key compliance systems in place before the central bank grants authorization. The report said those checks will cover anti-money laundering controls, counter-terrorism financing procedures, customer asset segregation, internal risk management, and employee compliance programs.
Firms that fail those checks could face difficulty securing approval to operate, according to the same report. For crypto platforms already active in Brazil, the added review means licensing will now depend on outside verification of internal controls, not just documents submitted directly to the regulator.
The central bank has not released the expected audit costs. Compliance experts cited in the report said independent reviews can cost tens of thousands of dollars, and larger reviews may run into hundreds of thousands of dollars, depending on transaction volume, custody arrangements, and company size.
Smaller platforms face higher compliance pressure
Large exchanges may be able to absorb the new cost, according to the report, but smaller crypto platforms and startups could face a heavier burden. The added expense comes as Brazil continues to build a more demanding rulebook for virtual asset firms.
Brazil approved its first legal framework for virtual assets in 2022. One year later, the federal government appointed the central bank as the main regulator for crypto service providers, giving the institution a central role in licensing and supervision.
In 2025, watchdogs added licensing rules covering custody standards, anti-money laundering controls, stablecoin oversight, and corporate governance obligations. The authority also gave existing providers until October 2026 to comply with the new framework.
Brazil expands crypto rulebook
The latest audit rule adds another layer to a framework that already covers licensing, custody, Travel Rule compliance, stablecoin supervision, and self-hosted wallet monitoring, according to the report.
For global crypto exchanges, Brazil remains an important market despite the added rules. A Chainalysis report cited in the story said Brazil processed about $318 billion in crypto transactions in 2024 and 2025, placing the country among the world’s major digital asset markets.
The rule change has arrived during a weaker period for the global crypto market. The report said Bitcoin fell more than 10% over seven days and traded at $68,960 at press time.
Crypto World
Ripple-linked token drops 5% even as bullish signals pile up
XRP keeps finding bullish narratives underneath the surface, but price keeps ignoring them. Exchange balances are shrinking, ETF money is still coming into crypto, and Binance inflows have slowed sharply.
None of that stopped XRP from losing another support level this week, which is usually a sign that technical selling is overwhelming longer-term accumulation.
News Background
• More than 25 million XRP left exchanges in recent days, reducing the amount of readily available supply for sale.
• Binance inflows fell to their lowest levels of 2026, a trend that would normally be supportive for prices over longer timeframes.
• Crypto investment products continued attracting fresh capital, with roughly $1.42 billion flowing into spot ETFs during the period.
Price Action Summary
• XRP dropped from $1.2712 to $1.2026 during the 24-hour session, losing more than 5%.
• The decisive move came during the June 2 14:00 UTC session, when volume surged to 205.7 million and pushed price through support at $1.25.
• XRP later fell as low as $1.1858 before recovering modestly and stabilizing near the $1.20 area into the close.
Technical Analysis
• The key story is that XRP is no longer reacting positively to bullish supply data. That’s often what happens late in downtrends, when traders focus more on price action than fundamentals.
• The breakdown below $1.25 shifted that level from support into resistance, meaning any recovery attempt now faces overhead selling pressure.
• The bounce from below $1.19 showed signs of short-term seller exhaustion, but follow-through buying remained weak.
• XRP remains trapped inside a broader descending structure, with lower highs continuing to define the trend.
What traders should watch
• $1.20-$1.21 is now the most important support zone on the chart. Losing it would expose the $1.13-$1.15 area.
• $1.25 becomes the first recovery level bulls need to reclaim before sentiment can improve.
• The market is now caught between weakening supply on exchanges and deteriorating price action. Until one of those signals wins out, traders are likely to remain cautious.
Crypto World
Blockchain Association-Backed Clarity Act Gains Support From 160 Former Security Officials
TLDR:
- 160 former security and intelligence officials publicly backed the Clarity Act before Senate review.
- The proposal expands AML, sanctions, and compliance duties across key crypto market participants.
- Treasury would lead a new information-sharing program targeting digital asset crime risks.
- Supporters say the bill increases enforcement tools without limiting existing criminal authorities.
A group of 160 former national security, intelligence, and law enforcement officials has urged the U.S. Senate to advance the Clarity Act. The push adds national security backing to one of the most closely watched crypto market structure bills in Washington.
Supporters argue the proposal would strengthen oversight while expanding enforcement tools across digital asset markets. The letter targets Senate leadership as lawmakers continue debating the future of crypto regulation in the United States.
Clarity Act Support Centers on Crypto Oversight and Enforcement
The officials outlined their position in a letter released through the Blockchain Association on June 3. They addressed the document to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.
According to the letter, digital asset activity continues to expand globally and increasingly crosses multiple jurisdictions. The signatories argued that the United States should keep that activity under domestic regulatory oversight rather than allowing it to move offshore.
They said a federal framework could improve visibility for investigators and strengthen enforcement efforts against financial crime. The group also stated that regulatory clarity would help law enforcement agencies track illicit activity more effectively.
The letter highlighted several provisions included in the Clarity Act. Among them are expanded Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions compliance obligations for digital commodity brokers, dealers, and exchanges.
The proposal would also create a Treasury-led information-sharing pilot program involving agencies such as the Department of Justice, FBI, and DEA. The initiative would focus on illicit finance threats and emerging risks tied to digital assets.
Clarity Act Provisions Expand AML and National Security Measures
The signatories pointed to additional measures designed to strengthen anti-money laundering controls. These include broader suspicious activity reporting requirements and customer due diligence obligations for certain non-decentralized finance trading protocols.
The legislation would establish a permanent interagency working group involving Treasury, DOJ, DHS, FBI, DEA, IRS, and the Secret Service. That group would develop future anti-money laundering and counter-illicit finance proposals for digital assets.
Other provisions address digital asset kiosks through transaction monitoring requirements, reporting obligations, transaction limits, and law enforcement contact procedures. The bill also seeks to clarify sanctions compliance expectations for distributed ledger messaging systems through Treasury guidance.
According to the letter, the Clarity Act would extend Section 311 special measures authorities to digital asset activity and allow temporary holds on suspicious transactions. It would also require law enforcement notification in specific circumstances and reinforce compliance with lawful court orders.
The officials stressed that the legislation does not reduce enforcement authority. They argued that existing powers covering fraud, money laundering, sanctions evasion, terrorism financing, trafficking, and other crimes would remain unchanged under the proposed framework.
Blockchain Association shared the letter publicly, describing the Clarity Act as a framework that could strengthen coordination, compliance, and accountability across crypto markets while keeping oversight within U.S. jurisdiction.
Crypto World
Ripple Opens D.C. Office to Drive U.S. Crypto Policy Agenda Today
Ripple Expands Its Washington Policy Presence
Ripple has expanded its presence in Washington, D.C., as U.S. crypto policy enters a decisive stage. The company opened a larger downtown office to support deeper engagement with policymakers and regulators. The move also strengthens Ripple’s push for clear rules around digital assets, payments, and blockchain finance.
Ripple said the new office will serve as a central base for its U.S. policy work. The company plans to use the space for meetings with lawmakers, regulators, and industry groups. Therefore, the expansion gives Ripple a stronger position inside the country’s main policy center.
The office opening comes as Congress reviews major crypto legislation. Lawmakers continue to debate market structure rules, stablecoin oversight, and payment modernization. These debates could define how digital asset firms operate across the United States.
Ripple has spent years calling for clear and workable crypto regulation. The company argues that policy should protect consumers and support responsible innovation. However, it also says unclear rules can push blockchain activity outside the United States.
The company’s legal history gives the move added weight. Ripple fought a long case with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over XRP sales. As a result, the firm became one of the most visible crypto companies in U.S. regulatory debates.
Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, has often supported direct engagement with public officials. The company now wants to build policy with regulators rather than work around them. That approach fits its wider effort to shape rules through formal channels.
The Washington office also supports Ripple’s broader business strategy. The company develops blockchain products for cross-border payments, custody, and liquidity services. Therefore, U.S. regulatory clarity could affect both its domestic plans and global partnerships.
XRP and RLUSD Remain Central to Ripple’s Strategy
XRP remains closely linked to Ripple’s payment and liquidity operations. The token supports parts of Ripple’s broader network for faster value transfer. However, Ripple continues to separate its enterprise services from wider market speculation around XRP.
The company also promotes RLUSD as part of its stablecoin push. RLUSD gives Ripple another product for settlement, payments, and digital dollar transactions. Moreover, stablecoins have become a major focus in U.S. policy discussions.
Ripple’s mention of RLUSD highlights its move beyond XRP-related services. The company now competes in a market where stablecoins connect crypto platforms with traditional finance. This makes regulation more important for its next phase of growth.
The launch of RLUSD in Turkey adds a global angle to the Washington announcement. Ripple continues to expand in overseas markets while increasing its U.S. policy presence. That balance shows how the firm wants both regulatory access and international reach.
Stablecoin rules remain one of the most active areas in Washington. Lawmakers want stronger standards for reserves, disclosures, issuers, and redemption rights. Ripple’s expanded office could help it participate directly in those discussions.
The company also sees blockchain as part of payments modernization. Faster settlement, lower transfer costs, and stronger infrastructure remain key industry goals. As a result, Ripple wants policymakers to treat blockchain as financial infrastructure, not only speculation.
Crypto Regulation Takes Center Stage in Washington
The broader crypto sector faces a major policy year in the United States. Congress has advanced discussions around the CLARITY Act and other digital asset measures. These proposals aim to define agency roles and reduce legal uncertainty.
Ripple’s expansion signals that major crypto firms expect more direct rulemaking ahead. Companies want clearer guidance before launching more products across payments and capital markets. Meanwhile, regulators continue to assess risks tied to consumer protection and market integrity.
The new office gives Ripple a stronger platform during these talks. It also shows that the company wants a lasting role in U.S. crypto policy. Therefore, the Washington expansion places Ripple closer to the rules shaping digital finance.
-
NewsBeat7 days agoIsrael says it has killed new Hamas military leader in Gaza City airstrikes
-
Tech7 days agoNASA taps Blue Origin to deliver lunar rovers for Moon Base initiative
-
News Videos5 days agoThis is BROKEN! INSANE 5x MONEY CAR WASH WEEK! The NEW GTA Online UPDATE Today! (GTA5 New Update)
-
Tech5 days agoWaymo dominates autonomous vehicle registrations as Tesla trails behind
-
Tech4 days agoSpaceX just won a second Golden Dome contract. This one is $4.16 billion.
-
News Videos4 days agoSHE IS KILLING XRP!!! WATCH URGENT AND ACT FAST
-
NewsBeat4 days agoFIRST NIGHT REVIEW: Take That bring the Circus back to life in spectacular sun-soaked style
-
Business1 day agoJade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) Discusses Positive Interim Results From JADE101 Phase I Healthy Volunteer Study and Development Plans Transcript
-
Tech7 days agoThe Samsung pay deal is the moment Korean unions changed register
-
Crypto World5 days agoCFTC Has Approved the First Regulated Bitcoin Perpetual Contract in the U.S.
-
Crypto World7 days agoSpaceX’s $2 Trillion IPO: Why Tech Giants Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT) May Face Pressure
-
Entertainment7 days agoThe Most Misunderstood Sci-Fi Horror Movie of the Last 10 Years Just Took Over Netflix
-
Business4 days agoIs the Spurs Phenom Already Better Than Prime Diesel?
-
NewsBeat5 days ago
Novak Djokovic v Joao Fonseca LIVE: French Open latest scores and results after Jannik Sinner’s shocking collapse
-
Crypto World5 days ago
Snowflake (SNOW) Stock Rallies on Strong Q1 Results and AI Product Growth
-
Entertainment4 days agoWeak ‘Supergirl’ Box Office Tracking Amid Milly Alcock Backlash
-
Business4 days agoDemand Conditions Improve In Chemicals Sector In April 2026
-
Crypto World4 days agoMicroStrategy Moves $30 Million in BTC to Coinbase Prime: Is the Bitcoin Sell-Off Already Here?
-
Politics4 days agoThe House | Inside Andy Burnham’s Makerfield Campaign: “Nobody Thinks This Is In The Bag”
-
Tech5 days agoThis Week In Security: Ubiquiti Fixes, And FreeBSD Joins The Club You Don’t Want To Join


You must be logged in to post a comment Login