TLDR

• 21Shares listed the Strategy Yield ETN on the London Stock Exchange to expand access for U.K. investors.
• The ETN provides exposure to Strategy’s Series A perpetual preferred stock known as STRC shares.
• The product offers an 11.50% annual yield and pays distributions monthly in cash.
• 21Shares applies no management fee to the Strategy Yield ETN.
• Strategy holds 818,334 BTC valued at nearly $67 billion based on recent figures.

---

21Shares has listed the Strategy Yield ETN on the London Stock Exchange, offering U.K. investors exposure to Strategy’s preferred stock. The exchange-traded note tracks Strategy’s Series A perpetual preferred shares and delivers an 11.50% annual yield paid monthly in cash. The product marks 21Shares’ first U.K. vehicle tied directly to Strategy’s Bitcoin-backed securities.

STRC Shares Offer Yield Linked to Bitcoin Holdings

21Shares structured the ETN to provide exchange-traded access to Stretch, Strategy’s variable rate Series A perpetual preferred stock. The underlying STRC shares provide yield exposure supported by Strategy’s large Bitcoin holdings. The ETN currently offers an 11.50% annual yield, and it pays distributions monthly in cash.

The company reviews the distribution rate each month to support price stability and align with market conditions. The structure includes a floor tied to short-term interest rates to protect yield levels. 21Shares charges no management fee on the ETN, which creates a fee-free structure for U.K. investors.

21Shares President Duncan Moir described the launch as a milestone for the domestic market.

He said, “We are introducing an easy-to-access investment product that combines high income potential with a familiar exchange-traded structure.” He added that the product gives U.K. investors access to a strategy that was not previously available in an ETN format.

Strategy President and CEO Phong Le also addressed the launch in a statement. He said, “STRC is an innovation in the capital markets that provides the upside of a Bitcoin-backed security, with the stability of a traditional credit product.” He added that the partnership expands access for U.K. investors to Strategy’s capital model.

Strategy Expands Bitcoin Treasury and Adjusts Policy

Strategy, based in Tysons, Virginia, holds 818,334 BTC valued at nearly $67 billion. The company represents about 3.9% of Bitcoin’s total supply based on current figures. Strategy previously relied on issuing common MSTR shares to finance its Bitcoin purchases.

However, the company has raised $5.58 billion in 2026 through its STRC shares to buy more Bitcoin. This shift reflects growing investor interest in the preferred stock structure. The new ETN enables U.K. traders to access similar yield exposure through a listed instrument.

On Tuesday, Strategy revised its long-standing Bitcoin policy and adjusted its “never sell” stance. The company told investors it would sell Bitcoin when doing so is “advantageous to the company.” Strategy reported a $12.54 billion net loss for the first quarter of 2026.

The loss included $14.5 billion tied to the decline in Bitcoin’s value during the period. In comparison, the company recorded a $14.4 billion loss in the fourth quarter of 2025. Despite losses, Strategy has continued accumulating Bitcoin and expanding its treasury position.

MSTR recently traded at $183.45, according to Yahoo Finance data. The stock has gained nearly 44% over the past month. Bitcoin traded near $81,750 after rising about 18% in the same period.

Hut 8 Mining Corp. is navigating a pivotal transition as its first-quarter 2026 results highlight both the volatility of Bitcoin prices and a bold strategic pivot toward AI infrastructure. The Canadian-listed miner reported a quarterly net loss of more than $253 million, driven largely by a write-down tied to the market value of its Bitcoin holdings, which tumbled from a high of roughly $126,000 in October to about $60,000 in February.

Revenue for the quarter came in at just over $71 million, down about 22% from the prior period’s $88.4 million. Analysts had expected around $78.5 million, according to FactSet. Hut 8 noted that $66.0 million of its Q1 revenue came from ASIC compute, AI cloud and traditional cloud solutions, underscoring the company’s ongoing diversification beyond pure crypto mining.

More notably, Hut 8 unveiled a landmark development: a $9.8 billion deal to lease 352 megawatts of capacity to a third-party AI company over 15 years. The arrangement positions Hut 8 to monetize large-scale compute capacity beyond Bitcoin mining and into AI hosting and related data-center operations. The company had earlier signaled progress in this direction with the commercialization of the first phase of its Beacon Point AI data-center campus, a 1 gigawatt project that includes the 352 MW lease footprint referenced in the agreement.

Key takeaways

• Hut 8’s Q1 2026 net loss exceeds $253 million, driven by a write-down reflecting the drop in Bitcoin’s market value from October highs to February lows.
• Quarterly revenue stands at $71 million, down roughly 22% from the prior quarter’s $88.4 million; analysts’ consensus stood at about $78.5 million.
• The company disclosed a $9.8 billion, 15-year lease to supply 352 MW to an AI-focused data-center operator, signaling a major strategic pivot toward AI hosting and energy infrastructure.
• Hut 8’s shift mirrors a broader industry trend as crypto miners diversify into AI workloads, energy projects, and scalable data-center ventures to offset traditional mining headwinds.
• Industry dynamics surrounding electricity pricing and energy supply are intensifying competition between AI infrastructure and Bitcoin mining, with implications for network security and grid demand.

Hut 8’s quarterly numbers: the price of BTC and the pull of AI

Hut 8 attributes its sizeable quarterly loss to the revaluation of its Bitcoin holdings. The company noted that BTC prices have swung dramatically since last fall, trading above $126,000 at their peak and sliding toward the $60,000 region by February. In crypto markets, such mark-to-market adjustments can dwarf operating cash flows, especially for miners with significant BTC inventories and holdings. Hut 8’s management described the loss as a market-value write-down tied to the company’s Bitcoin exposure, a reminder of how sensitive mining operators remain to the coin’s price trajectory.

Despite the headwinds from Bitcoin’s price moves, Hut 8 reported that its revenue mix in Q1 still reflected a meaningful contribution from non-mining activities. The company said it generated $66.0 million in revenue from ASIC compute, AI cloud and traditional cloud solutions, contributing to a total quarterly revenue of just over $71 million. The juxtaposition of a high-profile impairment with a growing AI and cloud services footprint illustrates the company’s attempt to diversify a business model exposed to crypto cycles.

Market expectations, meanwhile, framed Hut 8’s results in a context of caution. FactSet consensus pointed to roughly $78.5 million in Q1 revenue, suggesting investors were looking for resilience despite BTC volatility. Hut 8’s management acknowledged the miss against consensus while emphasizing the strategic importance of the AI and data-center initiatives as the company navigates a shifting industry landscape.

Strategic pivot: a $9.8 billion lease and a new future

The centerpiece of Hut 8’s 2026 strategic pivot is the long-term lease arrangement for 352 MW of capacity, part of a broader plan to monetize substantial, scalable compute capacity beyond traditional mining operations. The $9.8 billion deal spans 15 years and is designed to anchor a third-party AI company’s data-center needs, effectively transforming a portion of Hut 8’s asset base into an AI-hosting platform. This move aligns with Hut 8’s earlier disclosures about advancing the Beacon Point AI data-center campus—an ambitious, multi-phase project designed to support hyperscale AI workloads while leveraging Hut 8’s existing infrastructure and energy relationships.

Analysts and industry observers have noted that AI infrastructure commands higher value per megawatt than traditional crypto mining, a dynamic that can reshape the economics of large-scale data centers. As Hut 8 reorients its business model toward AI hosting, the company will face new operating considerations, including long-term power purchase commitments, reliability of energy supply, and the ability to scale AI-friendly data-center services while managing legacy mining operations.

The broader market backdrop for this pivot is not unique to Hut 8. The crypto-mining sector has faced sustained pressure from rising energy costs, market volatility, and regulatory scrutiny, prompting several operators to diversify into AI and other high-performance computing (HPC) ventures. Cointelegraph has repeatedly highlighted this trend, noting that several miners are refocusing on AI-hardware deployments and energy infrastructure to sustain growth in a landscape where pure mining margins have eroded. The industry’s shift toward AI-hosting and related data-center partnerships reflects a pragmatic response to a structurally changing energy and compute market.

In parallel, observers point to the intensifying competition for electricity between AI hyperscalers and Bitcoin miners. Crypto trader and market analyst Ran Neuner has framed the dynamic as a race for a scarce resource: power. “Both industries compete for the same thing: electricity,” Neuner said, noting that AI workloads are currently willing to pay higher prices for capacity. Estimates floated by Neuner put mining margins at lower per-MW rates compared with AI hosting, underscoring why some miners are pursuing AI-centric business lines to sustain profitability.

These energy-market dynamics are not happening in a vacuum. Since 2024, major AI and cloud players—Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta—have signaled a growing appetite for nuclear-energy-backed power to sustain their AI infrastructure. The trend points to a broader energy strategy among hyperscalers and a potential reshaping of power-market demand as AI workloads scale. Cointelegraph has traced related developments, including coverage of AI-focused data-center expansions and energy procurement strategies that intersect with crypto-mining footprints.

What this means for investors, users, and the sector

Hut 8’s earnings trajectory underscores a key tension facing publicly traded miners: a need to balance capital-intensive mining operations with enduring value from diversified compute workloads. The $9.8 billion, 15-year lease represents not just a new revenue line, but a strategic bet on AI hosting as a durable driver of cash flow in an environment where mining economics can be cyclical and highly sensitive to BTC price movements. For investors, the question is how quickly and efficiently Hut 8 can translate this strategic pivot into meaningful, recurring profits while managing the transition from a pure mining model to a hybrid AI-and-mining platform.

From a market perspective, the shift raises several watch points. First, how will Hut 8 balance debt, capital expenditure, and lease obligations with ongoing mining operations? Second, does the AI-hosting business model deliver reliable, long-term returns in the face of potential regulatory, grid, or energy-price shocks? And third, how will the broader energy market respond as more data centers compete for power, particularly if AI demand accelerates beyond initial projections? These questions will shape Hut 8’s next earnings cycles and could influence investor sentiment across the broader mining sector, where several peers are weighing similar moves into AI and energy infrastructure.

For users and builders, the development signals a growing convergence between crypto infrastructure and mainstream compute ecosystems. If Hut 8’s AI data-center strategy proves resilient, it could catalyze more partnerships that blend mining facilities with AI hosting capabilities, potentially creating new pathways for energy efficiency, grid resilience, and technology deployment at scale. And as the energy landscape evolves—with nuclear-backed power and large-scale HPC demands rising—the industry’s appetite for stable, long-horizon power agreements could reshape how crypto miners approach site selection, energy contracts, and environmental considerations.

Readers should keep an eye on Hut 8’s upcoming disclosures for updates on the lease execution, cash flow implications, and the progression of Beacon Point’s phased development. The balance between a recovering BTC price, the economics of AI hosting, and evolving energy-supply arrangements will likely determine whether the company can turn this strategic pivot into durable profitability in a market that remains highly dynamic.

Eric Trump mocked JPMorgan at Consensus Miami 2026 for reversing its bitcoin stance within 18 months, saying banks have accepted they can no longer hold back the tide.

Eric Trump took the stage at Consensus Miami 2026 on Wednesday and attacked JPMorgan over its reversal on bitcoin, framing a timeline that moved from public hostility to mortgage products in under two years. Trump, co-founder and chief strategy officer of American Bitcoin, cast the shift as a concession by the banking establishment.

“JPMorgan, who was crapping all over bitcoin 18 months ago, saying it was a joke asset,” Trump told the Consensus crowd. “It’s really interesting — now they’re allowing people to take down home mortgages against their bitcoin holdings at JPMorgan, this happened in a period of 18 months, my friends.”

Trump argued the broader financial industry has been forced to capitulate. “The financial institutions all realize that they’ve lost and they can no longer push back,” he said. “And so instead of actually fighting against the tide, you know what they’re doing, they’re swimming with it for the first time.”

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon described bitcoin as a fraud and a speculative asset at multiple points over the past decade. The bank has since pivoted, building out its Kinexys blockchain platform, which has processed more than $1 trillion in transactions, and sponsoring Consensus Miami 2026 for the first time. As crypto.news documented, JPMorgan is now embedded across crypto infrastructure, including as a key institutional partner for Chainlink.

Trump also referenced his family’s history of being debanked, calling it the experience that pushed him toward advocating for bitcoin’s censorship-resistant rails. American Bitcoin holds all mined coins without selling. For Trump, JPMorgan’s shift from critic to mortgage provider in 18 months is the clearest evidence yet that institutional resistance to bitcoin is over.

The White House believes it is “getting close to an agreement with Iran on a one-page memorandum of understanding to end the war and set a framework for more detailed nuclear negotiations,” Axios reported on Wednesday, citing two US officials and two additional sources briefed on the talks. The US expects Tehran’s response on several key points within the next 48 hours, making this “the closest the parties have been to an agreement since the war began,” according to the report.

Memo could end war and reopen Strait of Hormuz

Under the draft, Iran would commit to a moratorium on uranium enrichment, while Washington would agree to lift some sanctions and release billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets, Reuters summarized in its own write‑up of the Axios story. Both sides would also lift restrictions on transit through the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint that handles roughly 20% of global oil trade and has been partially shut by Iranian measures and a US naval blockade during the conflict.

The memorandum, described as a 14‑point, single‑page document, is being negotiated by Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner with several Iranian officials, using a mix of direct and mediated channels. In its current form, the memo would formally declare an end to regional hostilities and trigger a 30‑day period of intensive talks on a fuller agreement covering strait access, nuclear limits, and sanctions relief, with venues under discussion including Islamabad and Geneva. During that 30‑day window, restrictions on shipping and the US blockade would be phased out; if the talks collapse, US forces would retain authority to restore the blockade or resume military action.

What a deal would mean for Bitcoin, gold, and risk assets

Markets have already shown how sensitive they are to each turn in the Iran story. When the war first escalated in late February, Bitcoin fell from about $66,000 toward $63,000 within hours, erasing over $120 billion in crypto market cap, while gold spiked toward fresh highs and oil briefly jumped more than 10%, as detailed in a Blockhead post‑mortem and a broader Economic Times review of safe‑haven flows.

As the conflict shifted from escalation to uneasy ceasefire, Bitcoin’s behavior flipped. When President Donald Trump signaled an initial pause in escalation and a conditional ceasefire tied to reopening the Strait of Hormuz, BTC jumped roughly 5% in a single session to above $72,700, according to Bitcoin Magazine. A later extension of the truce helped push Bitcoin toward $78,000, its highest level in more than ten weeks, Yahoo Finance reported.

Analysts quoted by MEXC and other outlets have framed this pattern as a classic “de‑risking, then re‑risking” sequence: in the initial shock, traders dump Bitcoin alongside equities and rotate into cash, gold, and oil; once a ceasefire or de‑escalation looks durable, capital rotates back into higher‑beta assets, with BTC often outperforming in the relief phase. A recent MEXC scenario analysis on the Iran‑Israel war laid out this exact path—oil easing back, inflation expectations softening, the Fed resuming cuts, and “Bitcoin breaking higher” under a ceasefire case.

If Washington and Tehran now ink even a preliminary memorandum that ends the war and reopens the Strait, traders will likely replay a similar macro script: crude prices and gold could cool from crisis highs, rate‑cut expectations might firm, and Bitcoin could benefit from both a weaker dollar and renewed risk appetite. Crypto’s response will not be linear—macro, ETF flows, and idiosyncratic factors all matter—but the market has already shown that for this conflict, peace headlines have tended to coincide with BTC reclaiming the high‑$70,000 to $79,000 zone, as noted by CryptoBriefing.

Over the medium term, a durable US‑Iran understanding that normalizes the Strait of Hormuz would remove one of the biggest geopolitical tail‑risks hanging over both traditional markets and crypto. That could shift the narrative away from “war hedge” trades in gold and oil back toward structural stories like Bitcoin ETF adoption, Ethereum’s roadmap, and the broader on‑chain capital rotation that crypto.news has been tracking in recent coverage, including this ETF inflow analysis, a safe‑haven comparison, and a macro‑driven market outlook.

A Republican US House of Representatives member running for reelection has won his party’s primary after crypto-affiliated groups contributed more than $500,000 in supportive media buys.

Representative James Baird won Tuesday’s Republican primary for Indiana House District 4 with more than 60% of the vote, beating challenger Craig Haggard and others.

Beginning with his first term, in January 2019, Baird consistently supported legislation considered favorable to the crypto industry, including the GENIUS stablecoin act and the market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

Source: NBC News

According to filings with the US Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Defend American Jobs political action committee (PAC) spent about $514,000 on media to support Baird. The PAC is affiliated with Fairshake, a committee backed by crypto companies including Coinbase and Ripple Labs that spent more than $130 million to influence the 2024 US elections.

“Representative Baird has been a proven leader for pro-job, pro-consumer, and pro-innovation policies in Congress,“ a Fairshake spokesperson told Cointelegraph before the primary. “We’re proud to support leaders committed to responsible regulation that ensures the US remains the global leader in innovation.”

Baird, who also received an endorsement from Donald Trump, reportedly thanked the US President following his primary win. Trump’s ties to the crypto industry have come under increased scrutiny as lawmakers in the Senate consider the CLARITY Act, with many calling for ethics provisions on digital assets before a potential vote.

Related: Americans distrust crypto, AI as industry super PACs flood midterms, poll finds

Fairshake, which reported holding $193 million as of January, is expected to spend millions of dollars in support of candidates it considers “pro-crypto” in the 2026 US midterm elections, as well as “oppose anti-crypto politicians” through media and ads. As of Wednesday, the PAC and its affiliates have spent about $10 million for races in Illinois and Texas in 2026.

Stablecoin yield compromise could advance market structure bill

Last week, US Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks announced that they had finalized the text of the CLARITY Act to include a compromise on stablecoin yield, one of the provisions at issue for the banking and crypto industries.

Although the Senate Banking Committee had not scheduled a markup on the bill as of Wednesday, many expect the stablecoin deal to advance the market structure legislation, which had been stalled in the chamber for months.

Magazine: Guide to the top and emerging global crypto hubs: Mid-2026

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Investors appeared to disregard Hut 8’s reported first quarter 2026 net loss of more than $253 million on Wednesday, lifting the shares of the Bitcoin mining company by more than 33%.

Hut 8 attributed the loss to a reduction in the market value of its Bitcoin (BTC) holdings, which fell from a high of over $126,000 apiece in October to a low of $60,000 in February.

Revenue for quarter totaled more than $71 million, down by about 22% from the previous period’s $88.4 million, according to Hut 8’s earnings statements. Analysts had forecast $78.5 million, according to FactSet.

The company also announced a $9.8 billion deal that will see Hut 8 lease 352 megawatts to a third-party AI company over a 15-year period. Wednesday’s results showed the company generated $66.0 million in first quarter revenue from ASIC compute, AI cloud and traditional cloud solutions.

Hut 8’s stock surged following news of a $9.8 billion deal. Source: Yahoo Finance

The company’s diversification into AI and energy infrastructure comes amid an industry-wide pivot away from crypto mining, as public crypto mining companies struggle with high costs and declining revenues.

Related: Bitcoin miner Core Scientific shifts to AI with 1.5GW data center push

AI and Bitcoin mining increasingly compete for power 

The shift to AI threatens the Bitcoin mining industry, according to crypto trader and market analyst Ran Neuner.

“Both industries compete for the same thing: electricity,” Neuner said, adding, “right now, AI is willing to pay much more for it.”

Mining companies can make anywhere between $57 and $129 per MW securing the blockchain, compared to between $200 and $500 per MW for AI infrastructure, he said.

Revenue comparison for Bitcoin mining and AI hosting. Source: Ran Neuner

As miners shift their focus to more-profitable AI ventures, the total amount of computing power dedicated to securing the Bitcoin blockchain declines, making the network easier to attack, Neuner said.

The need for massive amounts of energy to power high-performance computing applications, including Bitcoin mining and AI workloads, has driven demand for nuclear energy generation. 

Since 2024, several AI hyperscaling companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta have announced nuclear energy deals to power their AI infrastructure.

Magazine:  How AI just dramatically sped up the quantum risk for Bitcoin

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Welcome to our institutional newsletter, Crypto Long & Short. This week:

• Maxime Seiler notes that weak crypto prices mask adoption, making yield strategies the main trade.
• Kavita Maharaj‑Alexander writes on crypto’s next phase being driven by proving compliance in practice, elevating the infrastructure providers that enable it.
• Top headlines institutions should pay attention to by Francisco Rodrigues.
• PENDLE rallies on demand for on-chain STRC yield exposure in Chart of the Week.

-Alexandra Levis

---

Expert Insights

In quiet crypto markets, yield is the trade

By Maxime Seiler, co-founder and chief executive, STS Digital, Ltd.

For much of the last six months, crypto markets have felt unusually quiet. Not dead, but tired. While bitcoin has held up better than most, much of the altcoin market has remained in what can only be described as a bear market. Liquidity has been thinner, follow-through has been weaker and the risk appetite that typically fuels broad-based crypto rallies has been missing.

That is the surface-level story. Underneath it, however, the picture looks very different.

Institutional adoption of digital assets continues to move at record pace. Across mainstream financial services, the build-out is no longer theoretical. Banks, asset managers, payment companies, custodians and infrastructure providers are developing products and capabilities to support tokenization, stablecoins, digital asset custody, trading, settlement and portfolio access. In previous cycles, institutional involvement was often discussed as something that might happen one day. Today, it is happening, but much of it is not yet reflected in token prices.

That disconnect is important. The market has been pricing short-term disappointment, while infrastructure is being built for long-term adoption.

Part of the recent weakness is understandable. The U.S. government created significant expectations around digital assets, but the pace of follow-through has slowed. Markets do not like uncertainty, and crypto markets in particular are quick to discount momentum when policy clarity fails to arrive as fast as expected. At the same time, a meaningful amount of global technical and investment talent has shifted toward artificial intelligence. AI has become the dominant narrative in technology, pulling attention, capital and brainpower away from crypto in the short term.

But these two worlds are unlikely to remain separate forever.

One of the most interesting open questions is how AI agents will eventually transact. If autonomous software agents are going to pay each other, pay merchants, access services, settle invoices, move value across borders or interact with financial applications, they will need payment rails that are programmable, global and available 24/7. Stablecoins and permissionless financial infrastructure are often discussed as potential candidates. DeFi may end up playing a role not because it is ideological, but because it is practical. Machines do not need bank branches. They need APIs, instant settlement and reliable liquidity.

That future may still be a year or more away from meaningful scale. For crypto asset holders, the more immediate question is simpler: what do you do while waiting?

This is where quiet markets can be useful. Bear markets are uncomfortable, but they often create some of the best conditions for disciplined yield generation. When spot prices move sideways and speculative momentum fades, investors are forced to focus less on direction and more on income, carry and risk management. In that environment, options become one of the most useful instruments available.

Options allow investors to monetize volatility, express views with defined parameters and generate yield on existing dollar or crypto holdings. For holders who are not looking to sell long-term positions, structured options strategies can be used to generate income while markets consolidate. For dollar holders, they may offer a more systematic approach to earn enhanced yield while waiting for better entry points. For crypto holders, they can turn otherwise idle assets into productive collateral.

This is exactly the type of environment where volatility selling and structured yield enhancement strategies may perform well in certain conditions, provided they are implemented with proper risk controls. The goal is not to chase yield blindly. The goal is to harvest quiet markets in a disciplined way.

At STS Digital, we have seen growing client demand for these types of strategies. Investors are not necessarily trying to call the exact bottom of the altcoin market. They are looking for ways to stay engaged, earn income and position themselves for the next phase of adoption without relying purely on spot price appreciation.

Crypto has always rewarded patience, but patience does not have to mean inactivity. The next wave of adoption may already be forming beneath the surface. For now, until it shows up in price, yield is the trade.

Disclaimer: For information purpose only. Not financial advice. Client acceptance subject to conditions.

---

Principled Perspectives

The quiet infrastructure powering digital asset maturity

By Kavita Maharaj‑Alexander, deputy general counsel, Ascentium

As digital assets move into more structured environments, the industry’s next phase is being shaped less by new rules and more by the operational realities of meeting them. The shift reflects a broader truth: regulatory frameworks matter, but the ability to evidence compliance matters more. Whether an entity is licensed, exempt or unregulated, expectations around governance, financial crime controls, risk management and demonstrable controls are rising. This has elevated a category of service providers that rarely attract attention but increasingly facilitate the operationalisation of digital asset projects: the regulatory infrastructure providers supporting governance, compliance and operational continuity.

These providers deliver the practical functions that sit between policy and practice, including registered office services, financial crime compliance, independent directorships, administration and governance support. They do not hold client assets or operate trading platforms. Instead, they support the operational spine that enables entities to demonstrate substance, oversight and continuity. As more jurisdictions move from drafting frameworks to supervising their implementation, this infrastructure has become essential to the responsible operation of digital asset businesses.

The distinction between formation, regulatory authorisation and operational readiness is now central. Regulatory authorization, whether registration or licensing, establishes status but does not on its own demonstrate operational capability. Whether an entity is structured as an LLC or a foundation company, or authorised as a VASP, these forms provide legal personality or regulatory status, not governance in the operational sense. Policies and procedures demonstrate awareness, not implementation. Regulators and institutional counterparties increasingly expect evidence of functioning controls, documented oversight, and the practical execution of obligations. This is where regulatory infrastructure providers play their most important role.

The Cayman Islands offers a clear illustration of how this infrastructure functions in practice. The jurisdiction has moved from initial registration to licensing under its Virtual Asset Service Providers Act. This is accompanied by supervisory evaluation of controls, with thematic reviews focused on demonstrable AML/CFT controls, governance and risk‑based internal controls. Recent legislative updates, including the 2026 amendments streamlining tokenised fund structures, further reflect a shift toward practical implementation and operational clarity.

For globally distributed teams, local regulatory infrastructure providers — from AML officers to independent directors and administrators — often provide the practical means to meet these expectations. The same applies to foundation companies, which are increasingly used by DAOs and crypto projects seeking legal personality and operational continuity. Even when these structures fall outside formal regulation, institutional participants still expect governance discipline, conflict management and reliable oversight. Cayman’s digital asset ecosystem is supported by a mature network of governance, fiduciary, compliance and administrative providers who translate regulatory requirements into day‑to‑day practice, enabling entities to demonstrate functioning controls and maintain governance continuity.

The industry has long called for regulatory clarity, and while meaningful progress has been made, clarity alone does not create the conditions for appropriate compliance or operational efficiency. Operational capability does. The firms that succeed in the next phase of digital asset maturation will be those that place early emphasis on appropriate governance, financial crime controls and risk management; and the jurisdictions that thrive will be those with the infrastructure to support consistent, demonstrable implementation.

Digital assets are entering a period where the quality of execution will matter more than the ambition of policy. In that environment, regulatory infrastructure providers are becoming the quiet enablers of which firms, and which jurisdictions, are prepared for the realities of a more institutional market.

---

Headlines of the Week

By Francisco Rodrigues

Traditional finance and crypto are continuing to converge through tokenization and stablecoin adoption, even as regulators on both sides of the border move to tighten the rules.

• Wall Street giant DTCC plans tokenized securities platform with July pilot, October launch: The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, custodian of over $114 trillion in securities, will begin limited tokenized trades in July ahead of an October launch, with input from BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Anchorage and Circle.
• Crypto industry backs CLARITY Act yield compromise, pushes Senate Banking for markup: Senators Tillis and Alsobrooks released text barring stablecoin yield equivalent to a bank deposit while carving out rewards tied to “bona fide activities,” prompting Coinbase, Circle and the Blockchain Association to call for a markup.
• Tether posts $1.04 billion Q1 profit, reaches $8.23 billion reserve buffer: The USDT issuer reported $192 billion in assets against $183.5 billion in liabilities, with reserves now including about $20 billion in physical gold and $7 billion in bitcoin.
• Canada proposes ban on crypto ATMs as fraud cases mount: Ottawa’s Spring Economic Update calls for eliminating crypto ATMs nationwide, with officials citing FINTRAC findings that label the machines a “primary method” for scams and laundering.
• The $292 million crypto hack exposed DeFi’s weak spots. Here’s what must change, insiders say: Industry figures told CoinDesk the Kelp DAO exploit is a “speed bump, not a roadblock” for institutional DeFi, but argued zero-trust architectures, timelocks, stricter multi-sig controls and tighter bridge safeguards must become baseline before TradFi giants can scale onchain.

---

Chart of the Week

PENDLE rallies on demand for on-chain STRC yield exposure

PENDLE is up 44% over the past 11 days, coinciding with the launch of the Saturn sUSDat pool. sUSDat is the staked version of USDat — a tokenized claim on STRC’s dividend stream and price exposure. The pool has scaled to $22 million since launch, making Pendle one of the few venues to express the Strategy Stretch (STRC) trade on-chain

---

Listen. Read. Watch. Engage.

Looking for more? Receive the latest crypto news from coindesk.com and market updates from coindesk.com/institutions.

MIAMI, FL — Kevin O’Leary says Wall Street’s tokenization boom is mostly hype until Congress finally gives the crypto industry the rules it has been waiting for.

“Tokenization will never be adopted by institutional indexers, ever. Neither will bitcoin, which is still a fringe asset to the big guys,” O’Leary said at Consensus in Miami, arguing that large investors still see most digital assets as uninvestable without clear federal regulation.

Speaking at Consensus Miami 2026, the investor and “Shark Tank” personality argued that regulatory uncertainty is still preventing large financial firms from fully embracing blockchain-based assets.

He said the turning point will come only when the U.S. establishes a formal legal framework for digital assets. “It has to become compliant globally within the [Securities and Exchange Commission] with an actual passage of a bill,” he said. “When that occurs, it’s going to change everything.”

The comments come as Wall Street firms increasingly experiment with tokenization — the process of turning assets like stocks, bonds or funds into blockchain-based digital tokens that can trade continuously and settle instantly. Advocates argue the technology could modernize financial infrastructure by reducing settlement times and lowering costs.

But O’Leary said institutions still need legal certainty before committing significant capital.

He pointed to stablecoins as an example of how regulation can accelerate adoption. Referring to recent U.S. legislative efforts, O’Leary said stablecoins were adopted “almost immediately” once policymakers passed the GENIUS Act.

“Instead of wasting three days, we’re transacting in minutes at a fraction of the cost with full compliance and transparency,” he said, describing cross-border payments using stablecoins.

O’Leary also argued that institutional investors have sharply narrowed their focus within crypto markets. “97% of the entire value of the entire market is simply BTC and ether (ETH),” he said, adding that many smaller tokens have been “slaughtered.”

He described a growing divide between speculative crypto assets and blockchain infrastructure with real enterprise adoption.

The biggest long-term opportunity remains finding a blockchain platform that large corporations standardize around for applications such as logistics, contract management or inventory systems, according to O’Leary.

“You show me the adoption onto the platform that becomes a moat,” he said.

The investor also tied the future of blockchain and AI to infrastructure more broadly, arguing that energy and data centers may ultimately prove more valuable than the digital assets themselves.

“Power is more valuable than bitcoin,” O’Leary said.