Connect with us

Crypto World

February Jobs Data Shock: How a 92K Employment Drop Shifts Fed Policy Outlook

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR

  • February nonfarm payrolls dropped by 92,000, significantly worse than the anticipated 58,000-job increase
  • The unemployment rate increased to 4.4%, exceeding the 4.3% projection
  • Market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts increased following the release, with traders pricing in several potential 2026 reductions
  • Escalating Middle East tensions are driving oil prices higher, compounding inflation worries
  • Federal Reserve policymakers acknowledge the challenging data while urging restraint in drawing conclusions from a single report

February’s employment report delivered a significant blow to expectations, with the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealing that 92,000 positions were eliminated across the U.S. economy. This figure stands in stark contrast to analyst predictions, which had called for approximately 58,000 new jobs to be added.

The jobless rate climbed to 4.4%, surpassing both the prior month’s 4.3% reading and Wall Street forecasts. This marks just the second time monthly employment has contracted since the pandemic-driven collapse of 2020.

Harsh winter conditions significantly impacted construction sector hiring throughout February. Additionally, a labor action involving Kaiser healthcare employees resulted in approximately 28,000 healthcare positions being subtracted from the monthly tally.

Previous employment data also underwent downward adjustments. December 2025’s initially reported 48,000-job gain was revised to show a 17,000-job loss instead. January’s numbers dropped from 130,000 to 126,000 new positions, erasing roughly 69,000 jobs from earlier estimates.

Financial markets responded swiftly to the disappointing figures. CME FedWatch data indicates March rate cut probability jumped from 2% to 4.7% following the announcement.

Advertisement

Prediction platforms also registered notable movement. Kalshi data reveals traders currently assign a 26% probability to exactly one rate reduction in 2026, 22% odds for two cuts, and 17% likelihood of maintaining current rates throughout the year.

Fed Officials Weigh In

Mary Daly, President of the San Francisco Federal Reserve, indicated the employment figures introduce additional challenges for upcoming policy determinations. While recognizing labor market softness, she cautioned against overinterpreting data from any single reporting period.

Daly emphasized that inflation continues running above the Fed’s 2% objective, necessitating careful policy considerations. She referenced the three rate reductions implemented in late 2025, totaling 75 basis points, as measures intended to support employment.

Neel Kashkari, Minneapolis Fed President, suggested one or two rate reductions could be warranted this year should inflation moderate. He characterized employment conditions as “steady to soft” while noting Middle East developments might warrant holding rates steady.

Advertisement

Retail spending figures reinforced concerns about economic momentum. Commerce Department data showed January retail sales declined 0.2%, with seven of thirteen tracked categories posting decreases.

Oil Prices Add to Inflation Pressure

Tensions between the United States and Iran have disrupted commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Extended transit routes and elevated insurance premiums are driving freight costs upward.

Brent crude oil prices pushed beyond $80 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate experienced similar increases. Qatar halted LNG shipments for the first time in three decades, potentially creating opportunities for American energy producers.

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes contended that sustained Middle East instability could compel the Fed toward accommodative monetary policy, pointing to past examples.

Advertisement

The Federal Reserve now confronts the challenge of addressing employment weakness while inflation persists above target levels, complicated by energy price pressures stemming from geopolitical instability.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Kalshi Faces Lawsuit Over Khamenei Prediction Market

Published

on

Court, Kalshi, Prediction Markets

A class action lawsuit has been filed against prediction market Kalshi, alleging that the death carveout in the “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader” market was not properly disclosed to users and that the platform failed to pay out winning trades.

The plaintiffs said that the death carveout policy was “not incorporated into the user-facing rules summary,” and was not displayed in a way that would notify a “reasonable consumer” of the policy or its effects.

“Defendants, themselves, later acknowledged that their prior disclosures were ‘grammatically ambiguous,’” the lawsuit filing said.

Court, Kalshi, Prediction Markets
The class action lawsuit against Kalshi. Source: Court Listener

Kalshi voided trading positions for the market after the death of Khamenei, the former Iranian Supreme Leader, was confirmed, meaning the market did not resolve to a “yes.”

“We don’t list markets directly tied to death. When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death,” Kalshi co-founder Tarek Mansour said.

Advertisement
Court, Kalshi, Prediction Markets
Source: Tarek Mansour

The plaintiffs characterized the carveout policy as “predatory” and an “unfair” business practice for this specific market. The lawsuit said:

“With an American naval armada amassed on Iran’s doorstep and military conflict not merely foreseeable but widely anticipated, consumers understood that the most likely, and in many cases the only realistic, mechanism by which an 85-year-old autocratic leader would ‘leave office’ was through his death. Defendants understood this as well.”

Mansour also announced reimbursements for users affected by the carveout policy, calculated using the “last traded price” for the market before the death of Khamenei was confirmed. The reimbursement policy also drew significant pushback from users. 

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit say that the methodology and precise timestamps used to calculate the “last traded price” for the prediction market were not disclosed or transparent. 

Related: Kalshi bans US politician over alleged insider trading violation

Kalshi co-founder fires back against lawsuit claims

Mansour maintained that Kalshi was simply adhering to its policy of not allowing “death markets” and said the policy was clearly stated in the market rules.

Advertisement
Court, Kalshi, Prediction Markets
Source: Tarek Mansour

“Kalshi made no money here and even reimbursed all losses out of pocket. Not a single user walked away losing money from this market,” he said.

The incident came amid trading volumes on prediction markets surging to record highs in 2026, as the platforms gain popularity.

Magazine: IronClaw rivals OpenClaw, Olas launches bots for Polymarket — AI Eye