Crypto World
Fed Seeks Public Feedback on Proposal to End Operation Chokepoint 2.0
The Federal Reserve is moving to enshrine a rule that would remove reputational risk as a driver of banking supervision, a shift crypto advocates say could blunt a pattern of debanking in recent years. The central bank began codifying the change last June, directing its supervisors to stop pressuring banks to sever client ties over reputation concerns and instead assess banking relationships primarily through financial risk management. Now, in a formal rulemaking proposal published on Monday, the Fed is inviting public comment on turning that approach into law, with a 60-day window to hear from stakeholders. The initiative arrives amid ongoing debates about the boundaries of political and ideological considerations in financial services and bears directly on how crypto firms access banking pathways that were once routine.
The Fed’s upward move comes with explicit acknowledgment of the concerns raised by lawmakers and industry observers about how reputation risk has been wielded in ways that affect crypto and other disfavored sectors. In the accompanying release, vice chair for supervision Michelle Bowman framed the issue in stark terms: “We have heard troubling cases of debanking — where supervisors use concerns about reputation risk to pressure financial institutions to debank customers because of their political views, religious beliefs, or involvement in disfavored but lawful businesses.” She stressed that discrimination on these bases runs counter to federal policy and has no place in the Fed’s supervisory framework. The push to formalize this standard reflects a desire to shield legitimate business activity from ad hoc revocation of banking access under the guise of reputation risk.
As the digital asset ecosystem pushes for clearer rules and a more stable banking landscape, political observers weighed in as well. In a post on X, Senator Cynthia Lummis lauded the Fed’s move, arguing that it should not be the regulator’s role to adjudicate who can participate in the crypto economy. She framed the reform as a breaking point that could help “permanently remove ‘reputation risk’ from Fed policy and put Operation Chokepoint 2.0 to rest so America can become the digital asset capital of the world.” The sentiment was echoed by Galaxy Digital’s head of firmwide research, Alex Thorn, who lauded the development as part of the industry’s ongoing push to roll back what supporters call choke points in traditional finance. Thorn signaled via X that the rollback continues, underscoring the ongoing tension between crypto firms seeking direct access to banking services and legacy financial institutions wary of reputational exposure.
Operation Chokepoint 2.0 is a label used within crypto circles to describe what some perceived as a coordinated effort by the Biden administration and the banking sector to restrict crypto firms’ access to essential banking services. The discourse around this concept has included references to previous policy debates and actions that crypto insiders argued were designed to curb the industry’s growth by pressuring banks to sever ties. The Fed’s latest move—aimed at removing reputation-based triggers from supervisory decisions—has been positioned by supporters as a corrective step toward neutral, risk-based decisions that prioritize financial metrics over political or ideological considerations. The discourse surrounding debanking isn’t new: disclosures and investigations have connected the policy debate to broader questions about regulatory overreach, financial privacy, and the U.S.’s stance toward crypto innovation.
The policy questions extend beyond banking practices into the political discourse around regulation. The administration has signaled an intent to curb debanking in the United States, with discussions touching on how regulators should approach crypto-related clients. The public record features a mix of official statements and industry commentary about the proper balance between safeguarding the financial system and enabling a vibrant digital asset sector. The thread linking this initiative to broader regulatory reform remains a focal point for crypto firms seeking greater clarity and predictability in how banks evaluate risk and structure services for digital assets.
In parallel, proponents of the reform have pointed to links between reputational considerations and broader regulatory strategies aimed at safeguarding consumers while not constraining legitimate innovation. The Fed’s invitation for public comment signals a willingness to test the proposed framework against diverse viewpoints before any final rule is enshrined. If adopted, the rule could set a precedent for how U.S. supervisory agencies weigh risk and approach non-financial considerations in decisions that affect access to fundamental banking services for crypto businesses and other sectors that have faced similar pressures.
Beyond the policy debate, the legal and practical implications loom large. Some observers have highlighted how banks may recalibrate due to the clarity this rule would provide or because it reduces discretionary leverage tied to reputational risk. Others warn that a formalized standard would still require careful definition to avoid unintended consequences, such as banks underreacting to financial risk signals or inadvertently channeling risk through opaque channels. In the end, the rule’s success hinges on how well the Fed can translate a principle into a measurable framework that stands up to scrutiny and serves as a reliable reference for bankers, crypto firms, and regulators alike. The Fed’s consultation period will be a key barometer of how broad support is for codifying this approach and what refinements may be necessary to address edge cases and evolving digital-asset landscapes.
The evolving narrative around debanking and regulatory clarity has also intersected with political dimensions, including ongoing disputes over how bank accounts are treated during periods of political or ideological contention. While the Fed’s move is framed as a technical adjustment to supervisory practice, the broader implications touch on the dynamics of financial inclusion, national competitiveness in the crypto space, and the boundaries of regulatory intervention in private-sector decisions. As negotiators and policymakers weigh the future of digital asset markets, this rulemaking could become a touchstone for how the United States balances the need to manage risk with the desire to foster innovation and maintain the country’s pull in the global crypto economy. The public comment period will determine not only the technical shape of the rule but also the degree to which the policy resonates across industry, advocacy groups, and financial institutions that must implement it in the months ahead.
Key takeaways
- The Fed is seeking to codify the removal of reputation risk as a factor in banking supervision, a move crypto advocates view as reducing punitive pressure on banks over political or ideological considerations.
- A 60-day public-comment window accompanies the proposal, signaling an invitation for industry, lawmakers, and the public to weigh in on the formal rule.
- The initiative follows a June policy shift in which the Fed directed supervisors to base decisions on financial risk management rather than reputational concerns.
- Supporters, including lawmakers and industry figures, frame the reform as a step toward restoring access to banking for crypto firms and ending what critics call “Chokepoint 2.0.”
- Opponents may push for careful definitions of “reputation risk” to avoid unintended loopholes or gaps in enforcement that could leave some customers exposed to informal criteria.
Market context: The policy sits within a broader regulatory environment where liquidity, risk sentiment, and clarity around digital assets influence the willingness of traditional banks to service crypto clients. As policymakers push for explicit standards, market participants look for predictable frameworks that reduce opacity in a space historically marked by sudden access changes and reputational triggers.
Why it matters
For crypto companies, the Fed’s potential rule offers a clearer path to banking access that is less contingent on perceived reputational concerns. In a sector where financial infrastructure—payments, settlement, and treasury services—can determine a project’s viability, a formal standard buffers firms against abrupt disconnections from banking rails. The change could also incentivize banks to adopt uniform risk-based criteria, improving consistency across institutions and reducing the likelihood that decisions are swayed by external factors unrelated to financial health.
From a policy perspective, the move indicates an intent to articulate a more transparent governance framework for supervisory actions. If successfully enacted, the rule could help normalize the treatment of crypto firms within mainstream financial services and strengthen the U.S. position as a hub for digital asset innovation. Support from lawmakers who view debanking as a civil-rights or anti-competitive concern further underscores the political resonance of the issue, elevating the debate beyond technocratic risk management into a broader discussion about access to finance and national competitiveness.
Nevertheless, the discussion remains nuanced. Advocates stress the need for precise definitions to avoid softening risk controls or eroding the ability of regulators to intervene when broader financial crime or consumer protection concerns arise. The rule will likely require ongoing refinement to address newly emergent business models and evolving threats, including opaque financial arrangements or non-traditional counterparties that still carry risk. The Fed’s engagement with industry stakeholders, as evidenced by the 60-day comment period, will be a critical litmus test for how quickly and effectively a clearer, more stable regime can take shape.
What to watch next
- Public comments: The 60-day window opens with the formal proposal and should yield a spectrum of views from banks, crypto firms, consumer groups, and policymakers.
- Final rule release: The Fed will publish the final text, outlining definitions, enforcement mechanisms, and transition timelines for banks to align with the new standard.
- Banking industry response: Expect filings, memos, and industry white papers detailing how lenders foresee applying the rule in practice and where they foresee friction or ambiguities.
- Regulatory coordination: Observers will look for alignment with other regulators’ approaches to reputational risk and how the rule interacts with anti-money-laundering and sanctions regimes.
Sources & verification
- Federal Reserve press release: June 23, 2025, announcing changes to supervision focused away from reputation risk
- Federal Reserve press release: February 23, 2026, inviting public comment on turning the approach into law
- Senator Cynthia Lummis (X) post praising the move: https://x.com/senlummis/status/2026060712305365065
- Galaxy Digital Alex Thorn (X) post commenting on the rollback: https://x.com/intangiblecoins/status/2026069012124164150
- Cointelegraph article: Operation Chokepoint crypto banking restrictions
Market reaction and key details
The Fed’s initiative to codify reputation-risk exclusion from supervisory judgment underscores a broader shift toward risk-based banking decisions that foreground financial metrics over reputational considerations. The formal rulemaking process, including a 60-day comment window, invites a wide spectrum of perspectives, ensuring that the final framework balances financial stability with the industry’s push for more straightforward access to banking services. Industry observers note that the policy’s success will hinge on how clearly the Fed defines “reputation risk” and how it handles edge cases where reputational concerns intersect with legitimate risk signals. The conversation also weaves in the historical debate around “Operation Chokepoint 2.0,” a label used by crypto insiders to describe perceived regulatory and banking pressures on crypto firms, which the current proposals seek to reverse or at least diminish in influence over supervisory outcomes. The official narrative aligns with a broader push to position the United States as a competitive, innovation-friendly environment for digital assets while maintaining guardrails that deter illicit activity.
The momentum behind the policy has drawn attention from lawmakers and industry figures who argue it could restore a more predictable banking environment for crypto companies. The ongoing public debate touches on questions of how much regulatory discretion should be exercised based on non-financial considerations and how transparent the decision-making process should be for banks that service digital-asset businesses. With the 60-day window now open, observers will be watching not only for the rule’s final form but also for the evidence of consensus around where the balance should lie between risk control and access to essential banking services.
Ultimately, the Fed’s proposed rule is part of a larger narrative about how the United States intends to steward innovation in the digital asset space while preserving the integrity of the financial system. If the rule stands up to scrutiny and gains broad support, it could reduce the volatility that arises when firms lose access to banking for reasons tied more to reputation than to tangible financial risk. For participants across the industry—from fintech startups to established crypto exchanges—the development represents a potential turning point in the governance of banking relationships and the speed at which the U.S. can keep pace with global peers in the digital economy.
Crypto World
Crypto.com Secures Conditional OCC Trust Bank Approval
Crypto.com has secured conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to charter a national trust bank.
With this move, the cryptocurrency exchange and financial services platform joins a growing list of digital asset firms that received similar approvals last year.
As previously reported by BeInCrypto, Crypto.com applied for a national trust bank charter in October 2025. The OCC granted conditional approval in February 2026, marking a significant milestone for the company.
It’s worth noting that conditional approval represents a preliminary stage in the chartering process. The applicant must satisfy the OCC’s regulatory and operational requirements before obtaining full approval.
“Crypto.com today announced that it has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to charter Foris Dax National Trust Bank, d.b.a. Crypto.com National Trust Bank,” the announcement read.
Crypto.com emphasized that the approval does not affect the ongoing operations of Crypto.com Custody Trust Company. That entity will continue to operate as a qualified custodian regulated by the New Hampshire Banking Department as a non-depository trust company.
“This conditional approval is the latest testament to both our commitment to compliance and to providing customers trusted and secure services they expect from Crypto.com. This milestone brings us a major step closer to meeting leading institutions’ needs for a one-stop-shop qualified custodian under a gold standard of federal oversight,” said Kris Marszalek, Co-Founder and CEO of Crypto.com.
Firms such as Ripple, Circle, Paxos, and Fidelity Investments also received conditional approval for their national trust bank charter applications in December 2025. Meanwhile, BitGo went a step further, securing full approval from the OCC late last year to convert its state trust company into a national trust bank.
In addition, Trump-backed DeFi project World Liberty Financial’s subsidiary submitted its application to the OCC in January to establish World Liberty Trust Company, National Association (WLTC). The proposed institution would function as a national trust bank structured to facilitate stablecoin-focused activities.
The move by cryptocurrency firms into federally chartered banking structures reflects deeper integration of digital asset companies into the US financial regulatory framework. A national trust charter provides federal legal status, enhances custody capabilities, and may strengthen institutional credibility. Operating under OCC supervision centralizes oversight at the federal level.
However, this trend has also raised concerns. The American Bankers Association (ABA) and the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) have pushed back against the OCC granting conditional approvals. They warn that broadening crypto charters may blur the boundaries of US banking and create new challenges.
Crypto World
Michael Saylor Weighs In on Quantum Threat to Bitcoin
Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) co-founder and executive chairman Michael Saylor said he does not believe quantum computing represents Bitcoin’s (BTC) greatest security threat at the moment.
This statement comes as the quantum computing narrative continues to be a focus of debate among crypto circles. Some argue that it has already started to impact Bitcoin’s valuation and institutional exposure.
Michael Saylor Dismisses Quantum Threat to Bitcoin
During an appearance on Natalie Brunell’s Coin Stories podcast, Saylor weighed in on growing concerns over quantum computing. He said the broader cybersecurity community generally agrees that any meaningful quantum-related risk remains at least a decade away. Saylor added that it’s not a “this decade thing.”
“Whether or not there will be a quantum threat or a quantum risk is a question that is yet to be decided. But there’s certainly no consensus that there is any threat right now or that there will be a threat materializing anytime soon,” he commented. “I don’t actually think that the quantum, you know, narrative is the greatest security threat to Bitcoin right now. I don’t think it has been.”
He emphasized that major breakthrough quantum capabilities would not catch the industry off guard. If a quantum threat materialized, global banking systems, internet infrastructure, consumer devices, artificial intelligence (AI) networks, and crypto protocols, including Bitcoin, would coordinate software upgrades to quantum-resistant cryptography.
Previously, Saylor has suggested that Bitcoin’s greatest threat comes from ambitious opportunists pushing for changes to the protocol.
“The software does change. If you’ve got 30 versions of Bitcoin core in an asset which is 17 years old, do the math in your head and figure out how long it takes for versions of this stuff to roll out. The nodes will upgrade, the hardware will upgrade, the wallets will upgrade, the exchanges will upgrade. How will they upgrade? Well, wait 10 years. There will be global consensus about the best way to deal with it. There is no global consensus right now because there isn’t a credible threat right now,” he added.
Saylor also downplayed fears of Bitcoin facing isolated vulnerability. He noted that major corporations, financial institutions, and governments worldwide rely on digital systems that would face similar exposure in the event of a credible quantum breakthrough.
Companies such as Google, Microsoft, Apple, Coinbase, and BlackRock, alongside global governments and major banks, would all be confronting the same challenge.
“When and if it materializes, I expect that there will be some software or hardware or both reaction to it. The crypto community is actually the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,” he remarked. “So I think that the crypto security community will be the first, you know, to perceive the threat and to react to the threat, and they’ll be leading the way.”
From Wall Street to Core Devs: Crypto Braces for the Quantum Era
While the technical threat may be distant, institutional capital appears to be pricing in uncertainty. Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary recently stated that many institutions are capping their Bitcoin exposure due to concerns over quantum computing.
Christopher Wood, Global Head of Equity Strategy at Jefferies, has removed Bitcoin from his model portfolio over similar fears. Meanwhile, analysts including Willy Woo and Charles Edwards argue that quantum-related uncertainty could be contributing to Bitcoin’s relative underperformance against gold and weighing on its price.
As the debate intensifies, defensive measures are accelerating across the industry. Ethereum has incorporated post-quantum readiness into its planned 2026 protocol priorities update. Coinbase and Optimism are also actively planning post-quantum security enhancements.
On the Bitcoin side, developers have merged Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 360 (BIP 360) into the official BIP GitHub repository.
Crypto World
Ethereum is Sitting at 5-year ‘Demand Zone’ According to Analysts
Ethereum prices have tanked to bear market lows and are currently at a long-term demand zone, say analysts.
“Ethereum is sitting at a 5-year demand zone,” said analyst Merlijn The Trader on Monday. “Historically, this range has been accumulation, not distribution,” he added.
Ether prices are currently back at April 2025 levels, where it crashed briefly below $1,500. They are also back to long-term lows between July 2022 and November 2023, which was a deep bear market and accumulation zone. However, they could wallow around this level for months yet.
Nevertheless, the analyst remains confident that “momentum is building for a potential explosive run.”
ETHEREUM IS SITTING AT A 5-YEAR DEMAND ZONE.
Perfect entries don’t exist.
Historically, this range
has been accumulation, not distribution.You don’t need the exact bottom.
You need exposure before expansion.Big bases don’t drift.
They reprice. pic.twitter.com/0TQ23J2Lnx— Merlijn The Trader (@MerlijnTrader) February 23, 2026
Ethereum is a long-term investment
Investor ‘StockTrader Max’ said that Ethereum is no longer a “get rich quick” asset that turned early holders into millionaires overnight. They also observed that ETH was still in a five-year accumulation zone.
“If you own ETH to make a lot of money by next week or month, then you will likely be disappointed. Ethereum is an asset that should be held in many portfolios with a time horizon of years and NOT months.”
Fellow analyst ‘Sykodelic’ identified a “nice hidden bullish divergence printed on the weekly chart.” A hidden bullish divergence is when the RSI (relative strength index) makes a lower low, but the price makes a higher low. “It means that momentum was actually stronger, but price absorbed it better,” they said before adding:
“The last time this happened, ETH rallied 100%.”
“Crypto has a lot of tailwinds, but the price action is terrible,” said Fundstrat’s Tom Lee.
His Ethereum DAT BitMine continues to buy the dip and stake, adding a further 51,162 ETH over the past week, according to a Monday update.
You may also like:
“In the midst of this ‘mini crypto winter,’ our focus continues to be on methodically executing our treasury strategy and steadily acquiring ETH and, in turn, optimizing the yield on our ETH holdings,” he said.
ETH Price Dips Again
Ether could not hold above $1,900 and has fallen back to $1,830 at the time of writing during the Tuesday morning Asian trading session.
The asset is now not far away from its Feb. 6 low and does not appear to be ready for a move to the upside yet, despite all of the positive fundamentals.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Crypto World
How Crypto Payments Are Changing Business Cash Flow and Operations?
For many businesses, payment systems are still viewed as a supporting function rather than a strategic one.
As long as invoices are eventually paid and transactions clear, few executives question how payment infrastructure affects daily operations. That mindset is starting to change.
Rising cross-border trade, remote work, global supplier networks, and digital-first business models are forcing companies to rethink how money moves through their organizations.
In this shift, crypto payments are increasingly being evaluated not as a speculative asset, but as a practical tool for improving cash flow visibility, settlement speed, and operational flexibility.
Can Crypto Payments Improve Cash Flow Operations for UK Businesses?
Cash Flow Challenges in Modern Businesses
Cash flow remains one of the most persistent challenges for growing businesses. Delayed settlements, currency conversion friction, and limited banking hours create gaps between when value is delivered and when funds become usable. For companies operating internationally, these gaps multiply.
Traditional payment rails often involve multiple intermediaries, each adding processing time and fees. Cross-border payments can take several business days to settle, leaving funds temporarily locked and reducing liquidity.
For small and mid-sized businesses, this delay can directly affect inventory planning, payroll timing, and supplier relationships.
The issue is not only speed, but predictability. When businesses cannot reliably forecast when funds will be available, financial planning becomes conservative and growth opportunities are missed.
Why Crypto Payments Are Being Reconsidered?
For many businesses, payment systems are still seen as a support function rather than a strategic one. But is it time to rethink how these systems are integrated into operations?
Crypto payments are increasingly being reconsidered not just as speculative assets, but as practical tools to address inefficiencies in traditional payment infrastructures.
These systems help businesses streamline complex and costly processes, offering significant improvements in payment handling.
Unlike traditional banking, which is constrained by regional cycles and fixed hours, a crypto payment processor operates continuously, enabling faster settlements and greater transparency.
This is especially valuable for businesses needing predictable cash flow and seamless cross-border payments.
With the rise of stable digital assets, crypto payments are becoming not only viable but essential for improving cash flow management and reducing friction in global business operations.
Impact on Cash Flow Management
One of the most immediate effects of crypto payments is improved cash flow timing. Faster settlement means funds become available sooner, reducing the need for short-term financing or extended credit lines.
This improvement has downstream effects. Suppliers can be paid more quickly, often resulting in better pricing or stronger partnerships. Inventory cycles become shorter. Finance teams gain clearer visibility into incoming and outgoing funds.
For digital businesses operating on thin margins, even small reductions in settlement delays can have a measurable impact on working capital efficiency.
Operational Efficiency and Automation
Beyond cash flow, crypto payments can simplify operational processes. Traditional payment workflows often rely on manual reconciliation, delayed confirmations, and fragmented reporting across multiple systems.
Modern crypto payment infrastructure increasingly exposes transaction states through APIs, allowing payments to integrate directly into accounting, order management, and fulfillment systems. This enables automation that would be difficult to achieve with legacy payment rails.
When payment confirmation is reliable and machine-readable, businesses can reduce manual checks, minimize errors, and focus resources on exceptions rather than routine processing.
Platforms such as OxaPay illustrate how crypto payment systems are being adapted for business use, emphasizing automation, multi-currency support, and predictable settlement rather than consumer speculation.
Cross-border Operations and Global Reach
For businesses with international customers or suppliers, crypto payments can reduce geographic friction.
Traditional cross-border payments often involve multiple conversions, regional compliance steps, and varying processing times depending on destination.
Crypto-based systems offer a more uniform settlement layer, allowing businesses to standardize payment workflows across regions. This consistency simplifies expansion into new markets and reduces operational complexity as companies scale globally.
While regulatory considerations still apply, many businesses see crypto payments as a complementary option rather than a replacement, used strategically where traditional systems introduce the most friction.
Risk Management and Transparency
Another area where crypto payments are influencing operations is transparency. Blockchain-based transactions provide clear, auditable records that can be verified independently.
For finance teams, this can improve traceability and reduce disputes. Transparency also supports better internal controls.
When transaction states are observable and deterministic, businesses can define clearer rules for reconciliation, refunds, and exception handling.
That said, adopting crypto payments still requires thoughtful risk management. Businesses must evaluate custody models, compliance requirements, and integration quality. The goal is not novelty, but operational reliability.
Moving From Experimentation to Strategy
The early phase of crypto adoption in business focused heavily on experimentation. Today, the conversation is becoming more pragmatic.
Executives are asking whether crypto payments can solve specific problems in their payment stack rather than whether crypto itself is a trend.
For many organizations, the answer depends on use case. In environments where speed, predictability, and cross-border efficiency matter, crypto payments are increasingly being incorporated into broader payment strategies.
The most successful implementations treat crypto payments as infrastructure. They are integrated quietly into operations, improving outcomes without disrupting existing workflows.
Conclusion
Crypto payments are no longer just a talking point for innovation teams. They are influencing how businesses manage cash flow, automate operations, and expand globally.
As payment systems become a more visible component of operational strategy, businesses that evaluate crypto payments through a practical, risk-aware lens are better positioned to benefit.
The shift is not about replacing traditional systems overnight, but about using modern payment tools where they create real operational value.
For many digital and global businesses, crypto payments are becoming less about experimentation and more about execution.
Crypto World
Tether-backed crypto exchange is ditching the ‘retail’ label to build the secret plumbing for Europe’s biggest banks
Spain’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Bit2Me, moved 5.3 billion euros (around $6.24 billion) in trading volume in 2025, an eightfold jump since 2023, as it shifted from a consumer-facing platform to backend infrastructure for banks and law enforcement.
That volume was accompanied by growth in business-to-business revenue, which jumped from 18% of the total in 2023 to 27% in 2025. Crypto-backed loans, a relatively new offering, rose 672% in a single year, with the company’s CFO, Pablo Casadio, saying he sees the crypto industry entering a financial infrastructure phase that the company is taking advantage of, given its backing.
The exchange, backed by various banks including Bankinter, Unicaja, and Cecabank as well as telecom giant Telefónica and Tether, made $25 million in revenue last year.
Read more: Spanish bank Bankinter joins BBVA and Tether with stake in crypto exchange Bit2Me
Much of that came from a new API product that allows institutions to effectively outsource their crypto operations. Spanish wholesale bank Cecabank, which also holds a stake in the company, has integrated Bit2Me’s infrastructure to offer digital asset services to other regional banks, complementing a similar liquidity deal with BBVA’s Turkish crypto subsidiary, Garanti BBVA Kripto.
The exchange became the first in Spain to secure an EU Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) license and spent 3,000 hours on regulatory-compliant work and 2.5 million euros ($2.9 million) to achieve it, Bit2Me executives told reporters during a briefing.
The effort temporarily pushed its EBITDA into negative territory, but opened doors that few crypto firms can access and allowed it to start expanding. The company last week started expanding into the Portuguese market, with plans to enter Italy, France and Germany in the near future.
Bit2Me also unveiled that it has been eyeing the U.S. and Middle East markets, which are far more competitive. “If we do anything, it needs to be done the way we did it in Spain, everything by the book,” Andrei Manuel, the platform’s COO and co-founder, said during the briefing attended by CoinDesk.
Turning siezed crypto to fiat
It has also been acting as a “crypto liquidator” for the Spanish government. Bit2Me has built a pipeline to convert confiscated digital assets into euros, working directly with Interpol, Europol and national police, its executives added.
The system leverages blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis to ensure traceability. In 2025, Bit2Me processed 1.5 million euros ($1.76 million) in seized crypto on behalf of agencies that include Interpol, Europol, and Spanish police. These funds are converted into fiat currency for the state.
While other governments still auction off crypto through third parties, Spain’s direct liquidation model mirrors the U.S. Marshals Service’s deal with Coinbase.
Crypto World
Will Ethereum price drop below $1,500 as multiple bearish patterns emerge amid crypto market crash?
Ethereum price formed a bearish engulfing candle on Monday and dropped over 6% amidst a market-wide crash led by Bitcoin.
Summary
- Ethereum price fell over 6% on Monday amid a broader crypto market blood bath.
- Multiple bearish patterns seem to suggest more potential downside over the coming weeks.
- Ethereum ETFs have hit a 5-week outflow streak.
According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) price fell 6.3% to $1,855 on Monday during early Asian hours before stabilizing at $1,874 at press time. Ethereum price tanked amid a broader market crash as fresh U.S. tariff threats on all trading partners and potential military escalation in the U.S. and Iran conflict hurt investor appetite for crypto assets.
Notably, Bitcoin (BTC), the bellwether of the market, has dropped below the $65,000 psychological support level, wiping out millions of leveraged long positions with the shock extending to other major crypto assets such as Ethereum. CoinGlass data show that nearly $108 million worth of ETH long positions were liquidated in the past 24 hours.
On the daily chart, Ethereum price has formed a bearish engulfing candle amid its drop today. The largest altcoin in the market has so far fallen roughly 45% from its yearly high and 62% from its all-time high of $4,946 reached in August 2025.
ETH’s price action has formed a bearish pennant pattern characterized by a flag-like pole and a triangle formation at the bottom. A breakout from such patterns has historically been followed by massive downside risks.

At the same time, zooming out the chart also shows the formation of a multi-month descending parallel channel, another bearish pattern in technical analysis.
Based on these technical indicators, Ethereum could drop to $1,450 if it were to respect the lower boundary of the descending channel pattern. This would mean loss of the $1,500 level, which is an important psychological support.
A breach of the $1,500 psychological floor would represent a significant structural breakdown, likely triggering a cascade of stop-losses. Given the current macro-driven volatility, it could result in a rapid capitulation phase in the coming sessions as liquidity dries up at lower levels.
ETH investors have turned bearish
The bearish prediction for Ethereum could gain further traction from the lackluster demand for its exchange-traded products over recent weeks. Data from SoSoValue shows that the nine-spot Ethereum ETFs have recorded back-to-back outflows for the fifth consecutive week, totalling around $1.38 billion.
Meanwhile, the weighted funding rate, which measures the cost of holding short positions, has fallen deeply into the red territory, suggesting that Ethereum bears are increasingly betting on further price declines while paying a premium to long holders.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP extend losses as AI scare trade unsettles risk markets
Macro jitters from an emerging AI disruption trade are compounding crypto-native weakness, with majors posting 8-11% weekly losses across the board.
Bitcoin slid to around $62,900 on Tuesday, down 2.1% on the day and 7.5% on the week, extending a grinding move lower that has so far refused to produce either a clean breakdown or a strong bounce.
The price action has pinned the market inside the $60,000-to-$70,000 band that formed after the Feb. 5 flush — a range that is starting to feel less like a base and more like a holding pattern waiting for a catalyst.
Altcoins are faring worse. Ethereum traded near $1,829, down 8% on the week. XRP fell 10.8%, Solana’s SOL shed 11.3%, and dogecoin dropped nearly 10%. The underperformance across majors reflects a market where risk appetite is shrinking toward bitcoin and even that bid is thinning.
CryptoQuant flagged sell-side pressure among altcoins at five-year highs, suggesting holders are actively distributing into a market where buyers remain scarce outside of the largest cap.
That kind of structural selling tends to grind prices lower without the dramatic liquidation candles that attract dip buyers, making it a slower bleed that is harder for momentum traders to position around.
FxPro chief market analyst Alex Kuptsikevich said in an email bitcoin’s recent attempt at recovery is shaping up as consolidation rather than reversal. He pointed to a bearish pennant forming on the daily chart, noting that a move below the mid-$65,000 area would confirm downside continuation while a break above $70,000 would invalidate the pattern.
More broadly, he described the $60,000-to-$70,000 range as historically significant — a zone that acted as the ceiling for the entire 2021 cycle and now appears to be serving as a battlefield between long-term accumulators and newer holders cutting losses.
AI fears return
Adding to the pressure is a macro dynamic that has nothing to do with crypto directly but is draining the same pool of risk capital.
A Citrini Research report flagged an emerging “AI scare trade” this week, warning of widespread economic disruption from artificial intelligence across delivery, payments, and software sectors. The note triggered selling in tech-adjacent equities as investors reassessed which companies benefit from AI adoption and which face displacement risk.
That kind of broad risk recalibration tends to hit crypto on a lag. Digital assets don’t always sell off in lockstep with equities, but they are sensitive to the same shifts in liquidity and positioning that drive risk-off moves — and right now, the mood in both markets is pointing the same direction.
Bitcoin is now 48% below its October all-time high and sitting 5.5% below its 2021 peak of $69,000. The longer it trades in this range without reclaiming higher ground, the more the technical picture tilts toward the bears.
Crypto World
Satlantis Launches Bitcoin-Native Ticketing Platform with Lightning Wallets
Satlantis has launched as a Bitcoin-native events and ticketing platform that embeds Lightning wallets directly into user accounts and events, allowing organizers to issue tickets and receive payments in Bitcoin without relying solely on traditional payment processors.
According to an announcement shared with Cointelegraph, the platform functions similarly to services like Luma and Eventbrite, offering ticket tiers, attendee management and event pages, but automatically generates a unique Bitcoin (BTC) wallet for each event to facilitate direct payments and withdrawals.
Satlantis also integrates with Stripe to process fiat payments and said it plans to add stablecoin support, allowing organizers to accept Bitcoin, traditional currency or both through a single dashboard.
According to Satlantis’s crowdfunding page, investors in the startup include Bitcoin Opportunity Fund and Timechain Capital, a venture capital fund dedicated to Bitcoin infrastructure projects.
Using Lightning Network to cut fees
The company said its model is a way to reduce ticketing fees and expand access in regions where traditional payment rails are limited, using Bitcoin’s Lightning Network to enable low-cost, cross-border transactions.
The Lightning Network is a layer-2 protocol built on Bitcoin that enables faster, lower-cost transactions by processing payments off-chain.
According to data cited recently by River marketing director Sam Wouters, the network’s transaction volume reached an estimated $1.1 billion across 5.2 million transactions in November.

Related: How many people actually pay with Bitcoin? Real use cases revealed
Crypto’s expanding role in ticketing and live events
Efforts to integrate cryptocurrency into ticketing predate many current Web3 platforms, with sports teams and travel companies experimenting with digital-asset payments for more than a decade.
In sports, the Sacramento Kings became the first NBA team to accept Bitcoin for tickets and merchandise in 2014. The Dallas Mavericks followed in 2019 after owner Mark Cuban signaled plans to support crypto payments, ultimately allowing fans to purchase game tickets with Bitcoin.
Beyond payment acceptance, blockchain companies are also experimenting with how live events are financed and settled. TIX, the onchain settlement network behind KYD Labs, aims to turn tickets into tokenized real-world assets that can be used to access upfront capital and automate repayment flows.
Major sporting bodies have also explored blockchain-based ticket-linked products. FIFA, the global governing body for soccer, has experimented with non-fungible token (NFT) initiatives tied to its tournaments. NFTs are unique blockchain-based tokens that verify ownership of a specific digital asset.
Ahead of the 2026 World Cup, FIFA sold “right-to-buy” NFTs granting holders a reserved window to purchase match tickets at face value if certain conditions are met. The tokens are not tickets themselves but can be traded on FIFA’s NFT marketplace.

Magazine: Is China hoarding gold so yuan becomes global reserve instead of USD?
Crypto World
Crypto.com gains conditional approval for trust bank charter
Global cryptocurrency platform Crypto.com has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to launch a federally regulated trust bank in the United States.
Summary
- Crypto.com received conditional approval from the OCC to form a national trust bank focused on digital asset custody.
- The bank will offer regulated custody, staking, and settlement services but will not accept deposits or issue loans.
- The move reflects a wider industry push toward federal oversight and institutional-grade crypto infrastructure.
With this approval, announced on Feb. 13, the company can move ahead with its plan to establish Foris Dax National Trust Bank. Once fully authorized, the entity will operate under the name Crypto.com National Trust Bank.
The bank will mainly focus on providing institutional and corporate clients with trade settlement services, multi-chain staking, and digital asset custody.
Path toward federal oversight and institutional custody
Crypto.com initially applied for the charter in October 2025. To meet the operational, governance, and capital requirements necessary for a national trust bank, the company has since collaborated closely with regulators.
Before it can begin full operations, Crypto.com must satisfy several pre-opening conditions tied to the approval. These include finalizing its risk management systems, enhancing internal controls, and confirming that its compliance frameworks are fully in place.
Once approved, the trust bank will not operate like a traditional commercial bank. It will not accept cash deposits or issue consumer loans. Instead, it will serve as a qualified custodian, offering regulated storage and management of digital assets for institutional investors.
The planned services include custody of cryptocurrencies, staking across multiple blockchains, and settlement infrastructure. This includes support for Crypto.com’s own Cronos network alongside other major digital asset protocols.
The company said its existing custody business in New Hampshire will continue operating without disruption during this transition.
Leadership response and broader industry trend
Commenting on the development, CEO Kris Marszalek said the approval reflects the company’s long-term focus on compliance and security. He added that the charter brings Crypto.com closer to becoming a “one-stop shop” custodian for institutions seeking federal oversight.
The decision puts Crypto.com alongside a growing list of crypto firms seeking national trust bank status. Companies including Circle, Ripple, Paxos, and Fidelity Digital Assets have already received conditional or full approval for similar structures.
According to analysts, this change is a reaction to the growing institutional demand for regulated custody. Large investors are favoring platforms that adhere to federal regulations as U.S. regulations become more transparent.
Under OCC oversight, Crypto.com plans to lower counterparty risk, improve transparency, and appeal to traditional financial institutions that require qualified custodians.
If the charter is finalized, the company would gain nationwide coverage without depending on multiple state licenses. Compliance would be streamlined, and its institutional presence would expand.
Crypto World
Falling Binance Stablecoin Reserves Signal Liquidity Crunch
Stablecoin reserves on the world’s largest crypto exchange, Binance, have fallen back to levels not seen since October amid a crypto liquidity drought, according to CryptoQuant.
The stablecoin reserves are down 18.6% since November, dropping around $10 billion from $50.9 billion to current levels of $41.4 billion, said CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost on Monday.
Stablecoin reserves on exchanges “typically adjust based on investor demand,” and crypto “liquidity dynamics can be proxied through stablecoin flows,” the analyst noted.
Despite the decline, Binance still accounts for roughly 64% of total stablecoin reserves across all exchanges.
However, when a platform of this scale begins to reflect such a shift in investor behavior, “it becomes a signal worth monitoring,” they cautioned.
“For the market to stabilize, a renewed inflow of stablecoins will likely be required to reverse the current liquidity trend.”

Crypto liquidity drought continues
A contraction in exchange stablecoin reserves generally means that investors are removing liquidity from crypto markets by converting back to fiat rather than leaving stablecoins on the sidelines for re-entry.
“One of the key headwinds currently weighing on the space is the lack of incoming liquidity,” commented Darkfost, who cautioned that “from a broader cross-market liquidity perspective, conditions are unlikely to improve in the near term.”
Related: Bitcoin’s tech stock divergence is a ‘fire alarm’ for fiat: Arthur Hayes
The total stablecoin market capitalization has plateaued at just over $300 billion since October, according to DeFiLlama. This has followed two years of solid gains that saw 150% increases in stablecoin circulation.
The last time the stablecoin market cap saw significant declines was in mid-2022 during the bear market that followed the Terra/Luna collapse, and they did not recover until November 2023, 18 months later.

Fed rate reduction in March unlikely
Liquidity is also highly influenced by US interest rates, and policymakers do not appear to be ready for another reduction.
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said on Monday he was open to leaving rates on hold at the March meeting if upcoming February labor market data indicates “pivoting to a more solid footing,” reported Reuters.
CME futures markets currently predict a 95.5% probability of rates remaining unchanged in March, further adding to crypto market liquidity woes.
Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum: BIP-360 co-author
-
Crypto World7 days agoCan XRP Price Successfully Register a 33% Breakout Past $2?
-
Video4 days agoXRP News: XRP Just Entered a New Phase (Almost Nobody Noticed)
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Boden – Corporette.com
-
Politics2 days agoBaftas 2026: Awards Nominations, Presenters And Performers
-
Sports11 hours agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Politics13 hours agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Business6 days agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Entertainment6 days agoKunal Nayyar’s Secret Acts Of Kindness Sparks Online Discussion
-
Video7 days agoFinancial Statement Analysis | Complete Chapter Revision in 10 Minutes | Class 12 Board exam 2026
-
Tech6 days agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Sports5 days agoClearing the boundary, crossing into history: J&K end 67-year wait, enter maiden Ranji Trophy final | Cricket News
-
Business2 days agoMattel’s American Girl brand turns 40, dolls enter a new era
-
Business2 days agoLaw enforcement kills armed man seeking to enter Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, officials say
-
Entertainment5 days agoDolores Catania Blasts Rob Rausch For Turning On ‘Housewives’ On ‘Traitors’
-
NewsBeat20 hours ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
Business6 days agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
Politics7 days agoEurovision Announces UK Act For 2026 Song Contest
-
Tech2 days agoAnthropic-Backed Group Enters NY-12 AI PAC Fight
-
NewsBeat1 day agoArmed man killed after entering secure perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, Secret Service says
-
Politics2 days agoMaine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.

