Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Gate 2026 Q1 Spot Listing Key Stats: 35.7% of Exclusive Listings Gained 100%+ in One Week

Published

on

In the first quarter of 2026, against the backdrop of overall pressure in the crypto market and a more cautious risk appetite among capital, high quality early stage assets remained one of the most attractive structural opportunities in the market.

Gate listed a total of 37 new spot assets in Q1, covering 77.1% of the newly added projects across major exchanges during the same period, of which 27 were first listings, accounting for 73% of Gate’s new listings for the quarter; additionally, 14 were exclusive listings, representing 37.8%.

Amid heightened market volatility, Gate maintained a steady listing pace, strong capability in onboarding high quality projects, and a consistent ability to deliver positive return opportunities.

Overall Overview

From the perspective of total sample size, in the first quarter of 2026, using seven major platforms including Gate as the sample, a total of 48 new projects were listed across leading exchanges.

Advertisement

Among them, Gate listed 37 projects during the quarter, corresponding to a coverage rate of 77.1%, meaning that among the newly added high quality supply competed for by major platforms in Q1, Gate covered more than three quarters of the projects.

For general users, the importance of coverage is self evident. It directly determines whether users can access a sufficiently complete set of core new market listings on a single platform. If a platform has relatively low coverage, even if a few projects perform well, it can still leave users with the impression that important projects are not fully represented.

A coverage rate of 77.1% indicates that at least during Q1, Gate remained closely aligned with the mainstream pipeline of new project supply, allowing users to access most of the new assets worth paying attention to on the platform.

However, what truly defines Gate’s competitiveness is not only the breadth of coverage, but also the structure of that coverage.

Advertisement

Among the 37 new assets listed by Gate in Q1, 27 were first listings, accounting for 73%, while 14 were exclusive listings, representing 37.8%. If calculated based on the overall sample of major exchanges, Gate’s first listing coverage reached 56.3%. In other words, among the 48 new projects listed across major exchanges in Q1, more than half were first listed on Gate.

A high proportion of first listings indicates that Gate has strong attractiveness at the critical stage when projects transition from primary market narratives into secondary market trading. Projects choosing Gate as one of their initial public trading venues essentially reflects recognition of Gate’s user base, liquidity absorption capacity, initial price discovery efficiency, and market distribution capability. A platform that consistently secures first listings is often in a relatively proactive position in competition for project resources.

A meaningful share of exclusive listings reflects another layer of capability with substantial value. First listings demonstrate a platform’s ability to participate in mainstream high quality supply, while exclusive listings indicate whether the platform possesses independent judgment and differentiated sourcing capabilities.

Especially in a weak market environment, the selection difficulty for exclusive projects is higher, as exclusivity implies a lack of sufficient external validation from other platforms, requiring the platform to bear the responsibility of early judgment. If selection proves inaccurate, post listing performance will quickly reflect the issue; if exclusive projects perform well after listing, it not only indicates access to resources but also strong forward looking evaluation capability.

Advertisement

From this overall overview, Gate’s core foundation in Q1 can be summarized in three key characteristics.

(1) Broad coverage, indicating continuous participation in top tier new supply;

(2) High proportion of first listings, indicating strong capability to capture high quality projects at their entry into the market;

(3) A meaningful share of exclusive listings, showing that the platform is not merely following the market, but actively identifying and positioning differentiated assets in advance.

Advertisement

Taken together, these three factors form the foundation of Gate’s spot listing system in Q1. Only when coverage, first listings, and exclusivity all hold simultaneously can a platform’s listing framework be considered complete.

Post Listing Performance: Consistent Positive Return Coverage Across Short Term and 7 Day Windows

The quality of a platform’s listing performance cannot be evaluated solely by whether it secures projects, but also by whether those projects demonstrate stable performance after listing. A key characteristic of Gate in Q1 is that newly listed projects exhibited relatively consistent time series behavior across multiple holding periods, with overall positive return coverage remaining relatively stable.

Figure 1: Share of Gate New Listings With Price Increases Across Timeframes (5m–7d)

From the perspective of the share of price increases, among newly listed projects in Q1, 58.3% rose within the first 5 minutes after listing, 54.1% maintained gains at the 1 hour interval, 56.8% still recorded positive returns after 24 hours, 54.1% were up after 3 days, and 50.0% remained in an upward trend after 7 days. The data shows that the positive return coverage of Gate’s listed projects remained relatively stable across multiple holding periods.

Many new projects are driven by early speculative capital, short term sentiment, and traffic momentum at the opening stage, often leading to rapid initial price surges. However, if the project lacks fundamental support or if the platform’s liquidity absorption is insufficient, such gains tend to fade quickly, resulting in significantly weaker performance after 24 hours.

Advertisement

This is not the case for Gate’s Q1 sample. Across 5 minutes, 1 hour, 24 hours, and 3 days, the share of projects with price increases consistently remains above 50%, indicating that most listed projects did not exhibit a typical pattern of opening high and trending downward during the core price discovery window.

The 24 hour and 3 day intervals are particularly meaningful as reference points. Most participants in new listings are not ultra short term traders, and many operate on intraday, overnight, or short cycle holding strategies.

For these users, the fact that 56.8% of projects are up after 24 hours and 54.1% are up after 3 days reflects a more realistic trading experience. It indicates that positive return opportunities for Gate’s new listings are not limited to the initial opening phase, but show a degree of continuity during the key post listing holding window.

Further examining the average gains of projects that recorded price increases provides a clearer view of return elasticity. In Q1, the average gains for rising projects across the 5 minute, 1 hour, 24 hour, 3 day, and 7 day intervals were 238.0%, 275.7%, 326.3%, 311.6%, and 270.1%, respectively.

Advertisement

This indicates that once high quality new listings on Gate establish early positive momentum, the potential for price expansion remains substantial. Notably, during the 24 hour and 3 day windows, average gains remain around 300%, suggesting that the wealth effect of high quality projects has not disappeared in a weak market, but is instead more concentrated in a subset of carefully selected assets.

Figure 2: Average Gains of Rising Gate New Listings Across Timeframes (5m–7d)

Of course, looking at average gains alone does not provide a complete picture, as averages are easily influenced by extreme outliers, which can obscure the typical performance of most projects. Therefore, the median is particularly important in this context.

The median gains of newly listed projects in Q1 were +3.2% at 5 minutes, +2.4% at 1 hour, +9.3% at 24 hours, +10.0% at 3 days, and +0.01% at 7 days. Even when excluding the impact of extreme high multiple projects, the typical project performance within the sample still shows clearly positive returns at the 24 hour and 3 day stages.

This indicates that the overall performance of Gate’s spot listings during the quarter was not driven solely by a small number of outliers lifting the average, but rather that most projects maintained a certain level of positive return potential during the core post listing observation window.

Advertisement

Figure 3: Median Price Increase of Gate New Listings Across Timeframes (5m–7d)

For general users, what truly determines the participation experience is not whether there are one or two projects with extremely high returns, but whether the overall quality of new listings on the platform is consistent and whether it demonstrates a certain level of repeatability.

Based on the median data, Gate provided a clear answer in Q1, at least within the 24 hour to 3 day window: its spot listings exhibited strong consistency and a certain level of positive expected returns.

At the same time, the near flat median at 7 days also reflects another fact. The advantage of new listings is primarily concentrated in the early stage of post listing price discovery rather than extending indefinitely.

After 7 days, the market enters a more advanced phase of differentiation and elimination, where disparities between projects expand rapidly. Therefore, for users, not all new listings are suitable for long term holding; instead, within the first 24 hours to 3 day window after listing, the market presents a clearer and more stable density of return opportunities.

Advertisement

First Listings and Non-First Listings: A Dual Track Structure

When discussing a platform’s listing capability, many tend to focus entirely on first listings. While first listings are important, a platform with a truly mature listing system demonstrates its strength not only through first listings, but through the ability of different types of projects to form their own clear return logic. Based on Q1 data, this characteristic is particularly evident for Gate.

First Listings: Dominant in Quantity with Stronger Return Elasticity

In Q1, Gate recorded 27 first listings, accounting for 73% of all new listings. First listings formed the core of Gate’s listing structure in Q1, meaning that in most cases, the platform directly participated in the initial stage when projects entered the secondary market.

In terms of performance, the most notable characteristic of first listings is their strong return elasticity. Data shows that nearly 46% of first listed projects remained in an upward trend after 7 days; among the projects that increased in price, the average gains reached 502.8%, 440.7%, and 364.3% on the first day, 3 day, and 7 day intervals, respectively.

This indicates that the core advantage of Gate’s first listings lies not only in early access, but in their ability to build market momentum starting from Gate, often resulting in stronger price expansion potential.

Advertisement

Figure 4: Average Returns of Rising Gate Listings Across Holding Periods (1d, 3d, 7d)

From the perspective of extreme return distribution, this high elasticity is further validated. Among first listings in Q1, 7.4% of projects recorded gains exceeding 500% and even 1,000% within 24 hours. This indicates that within Gate’s listing system, the first listing segment serves as an entry point for high payoff opportunities.

Not every project is guaranteed to surge, but once a selected first listing aligns with market attention, narrative strength, and traffic momentum, the resulting price response is often more pronounced.

The underlying logic is straightforward. First listings occur at the earliest stage of public trading, where price discovery is still incomplete, market understanding is rapidly forming, and capital can concentrate more easily within a short period.

For platforms, the ability to secure high quality projects at this stage determines their capacity to provide users with high payoff, high attention early trading opportunities. For users, first listings offer the potential for earlier participation and higher return elasticity, but also come with greater volatility and faster divergence.

Advertisement

Non-First Listings: Smaller in Number but More Stable in Trend

Compared with first listings, Gate recorded 10 non-first listings in Q1, representing a significantly smaller share. However, in terms of performance, these projects demonstrate more stable median returns.

Figure 5: Win Rate and Median Price Increase of Gate Non-Initial Listings Across Timeframes (5m–7d)

Data shows that non-first listings recorded price increase shares of 80%, 90%, 90%, 80%, and 60% across the 5 minute, 30 minute, 24 hour, 3 day, and 7 day intervals, respectively; the corresponding median gains were +26.7%, +33.3%, +72.9%, +46.6%, and +3.2%. In addition, 40% of non-first listing projects achieved gains exceeding 100% within 24 hours.

The data indicates that although non-first listings do not possess the same initial pricing advantage as first listings, they demonstrate higher success rates of price increases under Gate’s screening mechanism.

This is because non-first listing projects have typically undergone initial market validation, allowing the platform to conduct a second layer of selection based on more comprehensive factors such as price performance, community attention, narrative diffusion, and market absorption conditions, thereby offering greater certainty compared to first listings.

Advertisement

Overall, Gate’s listing structure does not rely solely on first listings to demonstrate its advantage, but instead forms two complementary pathways: first listings provide higher elasticity and stronger wealth effects, while non-first listings deliver more stable median returns.

The former is more aligned with an aggressive approach, while the latter is more aligned with a stable strategy, together enabling the platform to serve different user preferences. From the platform perspective, this dual track structure is more mature than relying solely on first listings.

It shows that Gate is not mechanically pursuing a higher number of first listings, but is also able to continuously provide effective opportunities through the timing and secondary selection of non-first listing projects.

Exclusive Listings: The Segment That Best Reflects Gate’s Proactive Judgment Capability

If first listings reflect a platform’s ability to participate in mainstream high quality supply, exclusive listings reflect a more proactive capability in project selection, resource acquisition, and forward looking judgment. Exclusive listings directly reveal a platform’s project evaluation standards, risk control capability, and execution efficiency.

Advertisement

In Q1, Gate exclusively listed 14 projects, accounting for 37.8% of all new listings. This proportion itself indicates that Gate was not merely passively following the mainstream market listing cycle during the quarter, but instead maintained a differentiated project pipeline to a significant extent. More importantly, these exclusive projects did not underperform after listing; on the contrary, they demonstrated strong competitiveness across multiple key time windows.

Figure 6: Win Rate and Median Price Increase of Gate Exclusive Listings Across Timeframes (24h–7d)

From the perspective of success rate, exclusive listings recorded price increase rates of 64.3%, 71.4%, and 57.1% across the 24 hour, 72 hour, and 7 day intervals, respectively, with the 72 hour window showing the strongest performance. This means that during the period from day 2 to day 3 after listing, Gate’s exclusive projects did not weaken rapidly as initial listing momentum faded, but instead demonstrated clearer capital absorption and upward price momentum.

From the perspective of median returns, exclusive listings achieved +42.4%, +37.8%, and +12.1% across the 24 hour, 72 hour, and 7 day intervals, respectively. This indicates that exclusive projects not only have a relatively high share of price increases, but also deliver median returns that are significantly higher than the overall sample. This suggests that the strong performance of exclusive listings is not driven by a small number of extreme cases, but rather that most projects provide solid return quality within the core observation windows.

Further examining the distribution of extreme returns makes the characteristics of exclusive listings even clearer. From 30 minutes after listing up to 30 days, more than 20% of exclusive projects consistently achieved gains exceeding 100%; during the 3 to 7 day window, the share of projects with gains above 100% reached as high as 35.7%, significantly higher than the 15.4% observed among all first listings; even when extended to a 30 day horizon, 12.5% of exclusive projects still recorded gains exceeding 500% and even 1,000%.

Advertisement

Taken together, these data points indicate that Gate’s exclusive listings do not rely solely on initial scarcity driven momentum at the opening stage, but are able to sustain price discovery and attract consistent buying support across multiple post listing time windows, with a relatively high probability of delivering more pronounced return trajectories.

Case Review

Based on Q1 cases, Gate’s project selection broadly followed three pathways: one category consists of high attention projects where Gate completed early first listings or priority onboarding, followed by validation from other platforms; another category includes exclusive listings on Gate that delivered strong subsequent performance, reflecting the platform’s independent selection capability; the third category consists of narrative driven projects with strong community traction and topic diffusion, demonstrating the platform’s sensitivity to sentiment driven sectors.

Solana Mobile (SKR): Early First Listing Execution on High Attention Projects

Solana Mobile belongs to the DePIN sector, achieving an ATH increase of 2,459% after TGE and a 30 day gain of 715%. As a combination of Solana’s official hardware phone and Web3 applications, Solana Mobile benefits from inherent brand endorsement, a strong community foundation, and significant dissemination advantages. Gate conducted a simultaneous first listing with two other CEXs and went live one day ahead of B*** Alpha to capture market share, indicating that Gate maintained strong responsiveness to globally high attention projects in Q1.

From the SKR listing, it can be seen that Gate is able to enter the key early window for projects with high traffic, strong narratives, and elevated expectations, allowing users to participate before broader market coverage occurs. This capability reflects Gate’s competitive position in accessing mainstream high quality project supply.

Advertisement

CodexField (CODEX): A Representative High Return Exclusive Listing

CodexField belongs to the content creation sector and is one of the most representative exclusive listings on Gate in Q1. It recorded an ATH increase of 4,900% and maintained a gain of 2,566% as of March 25, while B***, B***, and B*** had not yet listed the project.

If exclusive listings best reflect a platform’s proactive selection capability, then CodexField serves as a clear demonstration of Gate’s strength in this area. The project received institutional investment from Gate Labs prior to listing, and Gate provided the initial secondary market pricing venue, ultimately generating a strong wealth effect.

For projects that are not yet widely covered but possess strong growth potential and market imagination, Gate has the ability to establish early positioning and, through its platform liquidity and user base, convert these opportunities into verifiable market outcomes.

Lobster: An Early Positioning Case in AI plus Meme Narratives

The combination of AI and Meme was a high attention yet highly differentiated direction in Q1. Many projects had strong narratives but lacked sustainability, while others demonstrated strong dissemination capability without translating into trading results. Lobster belongs to the AI plus Meme category and was first listed on Gate, achieving an ATH increase of 286% and a 7 day gain of 164%; B*** Alpha followed with a listing the next day after observing Gate’s market signal. This case highlights Gate’s early positioning capability in highly viral narratives, as well as its ability to lead early price discovery.

Advertisement

Overall, these cases show that Gate’s spot listing performance in Q1 was not driven by a single type of project, but rather by a combination of multiple sectors, styles, and narratives. The platform is capable of onboarding high attention mainstream projects while also identifying exclusive growth oriented projects; it covers both technology and product driven projects, as well as community culture and sentiment driven assets. This diversity itself reflects the maturity of Gate’s listing system.

Conclusion

Overall, Gate’s spot listing performance in the first quarter of 2026 can be summarized in one sentence: in a market phase characterized by overall pressure, reduced opportunity density, and intensified project divergence, Gate continued to maintain a relatively high quality pipeline of new listings and convincing post listing performance.

During a period where strong outcomes are not easy to achieve, Gate’s overall sample maintained a relatively high share of price increases across multiple time windows, with median returns at 24 hours and 3 days remaining positive. New listings demonstrated a certain breadth of performance, where first listings provided stronger return elasticity, non-first listings delivered higher success rates, and exclusive listings reflected greater scarcity and stronger mid term performance. The platform’s listing capability is not driven by isolated strengths, but by a systematic and integrated framework.

For users, Gate provides a more complete and structured early stage participation framework. Users seeking higher return elasticity can focus on first listings for higher payoff opportunities; users preferring more stable pathways can look to the higher success rate characteristics of non first listings; users aiming to access differentiated assets before broad market coverage can pay closer attention to Gate’s exclusive listing segment. For project teams, Q1 data also demonstrates that Gate possesses strong capabilities in initial trading support, liquidity organization, and price discovery.

Advertisement

From a longer term perspective, the core competition in spot listing capability among exchanges ultimately lies in whether they can consistently maintain strong project sourcing, selection, and outcome realization across different market cycles. Gate’s Q1 data clearly demonstrates this point: even in a weak market, Gate is able to list accurately, select with stability, and deliver tangible results.

Gate Research is a comprehensive blockchain and cryptocurrency research platform that provides deep content for readers, including technical analysis, market insights, industry research, trend forecasting, and macroeconomic policy analysis.
Disclaimer: Investing in cryptocurrency markets involves high risk. Users are advised to conduct their own research and fully understand the nature of the assets and products before making any investment decisions. Gate is not responsible for any losses or damages arising from such decisions.

The post Gate 2026 Q1 Spot Listing Key Stats: 35.7% of Exclusive Listings Gained 100%+ in One Week appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Best Crypto to Buy Now: Pepeto Raises Above $8.1M as Investors Look Past BTC and XRP During the Correction

Published

on

Best Crypto to Buy Now: Pepeto Raises Above $8.1M as Investors Look Past BTC and XRP During the Correction

Bithumb, South Korea’s second largest exchange, just postponed its IPO by two years after compliance fines, proving the industry is building for a longer timeline than this correction suggests. The correction is temporary, but the infrastructure underneath is permanent.

The best crypto to buy now is not the asset that needs billions to move 15%, it is the entry where the listing compresses the return into one day. Pepeto has raised above $8.1 million with live tools and a confirmed Binance listing.

Bithumb delayed its planned public offering by at least two years after fines and compliance issues, according to CoinGecko. The postponement confirms the infrastructure buildout will outlast the fear, as CoinDesk noted.

For the best crypto to buy now conversation, the correction is a pause in a longer story, and the entries positioned before the next chapter collect the most.

Advertisement

Best Crypto to Buy Now in 2026: Pepeto, BTC, and XRP

Pepeto

The correction has large cap holders watching BTC grind sideways, but the wallets searching for the best crypto to buy now already found the answer. Pepeto runs a zero fee swap engine that eliminates cost from every trade, and a cross chain bridge that connects networks so tokens move freely. These tools are live, which means every wallet using them interacts with a finished product at a price the Binance listing erases permanently, and that gap between presale pricing and listing day is where every dollar of real return lives.

The wallet behind the original Pepe project is part of the build alongside a former Binance expert, and the SolidProof audit confirmed the contract. The presale has collected above $8.1 million at $0.000000186 while the Fear and Greed Index sat at 9, and a $50,000 position earning 189% APY through staking returns roughly $98,000 in one year before the listing multiplier adds on top.

The correction will pass, the recovery will arrive, and the presale price will be gone, which means every day without a position is a day the reader’s money misses returns that the wallets already inside are set to collect.

The market always recovers, and the entries that turn corrections into wealth have tools working before the recovery starts. The Binance listing closes this window, and the presale counter ticks toward zero while the reader decides whether their money enters at presale pricing or pays whatever the open market charges after listing day rewrites the price.

Advertisement

BTC Holds $66,927 as Institutional Capital Builds Slowly

Bitcoin trades near $66,927 with dominance at 56.2%, according to CoinMarketCap. Institutional inflows are rebuilding, confirming the recovery forms underneath the fear.

Analysts target $72,000, but BTC needs billions more just to move 15%, math designed for pension funds. The best crypto to buy now for real returns is the entry where one listing delivers what BTC takes a quarter to produce.

XRP Holds $1.32 as CLARITY Act Approaches

XRP trades near $1.32 with support at $1.30 and resistance at $1.35, according to CoinGecko. The CLARITY Act reaching the Senate by mid April could shift sentiment.

The bullish case targets $2.00, a credible 50% gain, but that return takes months and depends on macro conditions the best crypto to buy now at presale pricing does not need.

Advertisement

The Bottom Line

Bithumb postponing its IPO proves the industry is building for a timeline far longer than this correction, and the recovery forming beneath the fear is going to reward the entries positioned before it arrives. BTC needs billions to move 15% and XRP targets $2.00 over months, but neither offers the presale pricing that a Binance listing transforms overnight.

Above $8.1 million committed during fear is the proof, and the Pepeto official website still shows the figure that listing day erases. The reader searched for the best crypto to buy now and the answer led them here, because early wallets acted before the crowd had reason to look, and the reader’s money right now sits at presale pricing with a working exchange behind it, which is how every early fortune in crypto started.

Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

FAQs

What is the best crypto to buy now during the correction?

Advertisement

Pepeto leads with above $8.1 million raised, live exchange tools, and a confirmed Binance listing. The correction is temporary and the presale price ends when the listing opens.

Why are large caps not the best crypto to buy now for returns?

BTC needs billions to move 15% and XRP targets 50% over months. The best crypto to buy now at presale pricing delivers the listing return from one event the Pepeto official website still shows.

Will the market recover from this correction?

Advertisement

Institutional infrastructure is expanding, exchanges are building for decades, and capital inflows are rebuilding. The correction is a pause, and the entries positioned before the recovery collect the most.


Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coinbase becomes first major US exchange to win OCC trust.

Published

on

Epstein files show crypto ties to Coinbase, Blockstream: DOJ

Coinbase has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for a national trust bank charter — a first for any major U.S. crypto exchange — as community banking groups wasted no time calling the decision a grave mistake.

Summary

  • Coinbase has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for a national trust bank charter, the company confirmed on April 2.
  • The approval positions Coinbase to offer federally regulated digital asset custody services nationwide under a single federal license.
  • Community banking groups have pushed back sharply, with the Independent Community Bankers of America calling the OCC’s direction a “grave mistake.”

Coinbase has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for a national trust bank charter, making it the first major U.S. crypto exchange to clear this specific federal regulatory hurdle. The company confirmed the approval through an April 2 blog post authored by Greg Tusar, Co-CEO of Coinbase Institutional, following a Bloomberg report that first broke the news.

The conditional charter would allow Coinbase to operate a national trust bank focused on digital asset custody and related settlement services. The entity will not accept retail deposits or issue traditional loans — its scope mirrors the structures already granted to Ripple, Circle, Paxos, and BitGo, which received their initial OCC approvals in December 2025. For Coinbase, the practical outcome is significant: a federal trust charter replaces a patchwork of state-level licenses with a single, nationwide regulatory status. It also positions the exchange directly inside the stablecoin custody and settlement infrastructure being built under the GENIUS Act.

Advertisement

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal confirmed the news on X, writing: “Consistent rules and regulatory trust are what allow us to innovate with confidence. Today’s conditional @USOCC approval is yet more proof that our approach is working.”

The banking backlash

The approval has not been well received by traditional financial institutions. The Independent Community Bankers of America, which represents thousands of small lenders, described the OCC’s direction as a “grave mistake” in remarks reported by American Banker. The ICBA has repeatedly urged the OCC to pull or revise its crypto charter framework, arguing that digital asset firms are accessing bank-like federal status under lighter regulatory conditions than traditional banks face.

The Bank Policy Institute has gone further, weighing potential legal action against the OCC over what it describes as an improper reinterpretation of federal licensing rules — a possible lawsuit that could delay or complicate final approval for Coinbase and others in the pipeline.

Advertisement

Institutional and market context

Coinbase’s conditional charter comes as the exchange is already embedded in U.S. institutional crypto infrastructure, serving as custodian for multiple spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. Full OCC authorization will require meeting operational, governance, and capital thresholds — the same conditions applied to earlier approvals before they became final. Until then, the conditional status means the charter is approved in principle but not yet operational.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) Stock Surges on Record Q1 Loan Growth and Token Adoption

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Takeaways

  • FIGR shares advance 4.93% following 113% annual increase in Q1 lending volume

  • Monthly loan activity reaches $1.19B in March, demonstrating accelerating momentum

  • YLDS token circulation expands to $598M, indicating growing platform adoption

  • Available capital from lenders increases 14% as liquidity deepens

  • Democratized Prime data reveals synchronized expansion across borrowers and lenders

Shares of Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) finished regular trading at $34.51, posting a 4.93% gain following a robust intraday surge and subsequent stabilization. During extended hours, the stock retreated modestly to $34.44, representing a 0.20% decline. The upward movement came after the company disclosed preliminary operating results for March and the first quarter of 2026, revealing substantial growth across multiple business segments.

Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock, FIGR

Lending Platform Volumes Reach New Heights

Figure Technology disclosed impressive performance in its consumer lending marketplace throughout March 2026. The blockchain-powered platform facilitated $1.19 billion in transactions, representing a 33% sequential gain from February activity. Year-over-year comparisons proved even more dramatic, with volumes doubling from March 2025 levels at a 102% growth rate.

First quarter results demonstrated ongoing momentum, with total platform volume hitting $2.9 billion. This figure exceeded the previous quarter by 7% while soaring 113% compared to the same period last year. The data underscores accelerating demand for distributed ledger-based credit origination and secondary market trading capabilities.

Advertisement

The organization maintains its marketplace operations as a primary revenue generator, offering home equity lines of credit, debt service coverage ratio mortgages, and unsecured consumer loans. Transaction activity through Figure Connect bolstered overall platform engagement. The expanding scope demonstrates the company’s increasing influence within tokenized lending markets.

YLDS Token Achieves Significant Milestone

Figure announced impressive progress for its YLDS offering, which debuted in February 2025. Outstanding tokens reached a valuation of $598 million during March 2026, advancing 2% from the prior month. The metric represents a dramatic escalation from the mere $3 million circulating during March 2025.

First quarter comparisons unveiled even stronger momentum, with YLDS circulation soaring 83% above fourth quarter 2025 levels. This trajectory indicates accelerating acceptance of tokenized credit instruments throughout the platform ecosystem. Furthermore, the expansion reflects increasing confidence in blockchain-enabled financial products among marketplace participants.

The firm characterizes YLDS as unsecured digital certificates collateralized by its affiliated entity’s asset portfolio. Consequently, the instrument enhances liquidity and capital formation across its lending infrastructure. The swift uptake aligns strategically with the organization’s comprehensive asset tokenization initiatives.

Advertisement

Democratized Prime Platform Records Symmetric Expansion

Figure’s Democratized Prime offering maintained consistent matched transaction levels throughout March 2026. The outstanding balance totaled $368 million, remaining relatively flat versus February figures. Borrower appetite edged higher to $376 million, demonstrating persistent credit demand.

Lender capital availability climbed to $453 million during March, posting a 14% monthly gain. This increase suggests enhanced funding capacity within the platform’s liquidity pools. The system maintains equilibrium between available capital and borrower requirements.

Quarterly comparisons revealed substantial acceleration across all measurements, including a 79% expansion in matched transaction balances. Borrower demand advanced 53%, while lender capital surged 112% compared to the final quarter of 2025. These metrics underscore broadening participation and strengthening liquidity throughout the platform architecture.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump fires Pam Bondi, puts pro-crypto Todd Blanche

Published

on

Trump fires Pam Bondi, puts pro-crypto Todd Blanche

President Trump has fired Pam Bondi and replaced her with Todd Blanche as interim U.S. Attorney General — handing control of the Justice Department to the official who dismantled the DOJ’s crypto enforcement unit in April 2025 and holds up to $485,000 in personal digital asset holdings.

Summary

  • President Trump has replaced Attorney General Pam Bondi with Todd Blanche, the DOJ official who disbanded the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team in April 2025.
  • Blanche, now acting AG, holds up to $485,000 in personal crypto holdings and authored the memo ending the DOJ’s regulation-by-prosecution approach to digital assets.
  • The appointment hands the Justice Department’s leadership to one of the most crypto-friendly figures in U.S. federal law enforcement history.

President Trump has fired Pam Bondi and replaced her with Todd Blanche as interim U.S. Attorney General — handing control of the Justice Department to the official who dismantled the DOJ’s crypto enforcement unit in April 2025 and holds up to $485,000 in personal digital asset holdings.

Bondi confirmed her departure in an April 2 post on X, writing that she would be “working tirelessly to transition the office of Attorney General to the amazing Todd Blanche” before moving to an unspecified private sector role. NBC News confirmed that Bondi was fired following growing frustration from the president over her handling of key priorities.

Advertisement

Blanche is not a new name in the digital asset industry. As Deputy Attorney General, he authored the April 2025 memo that formally disbanded the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, declaring in plain language that the DOJ “is not a digital assets regulator” and criticizing the prior administration’s approach as a “reckless strategy of regulation by prosecution.”

The memo directed prosecutors to stop pursuing cases against crypto exchanges, mixers, and offline wallets for end-user behavior, shifting enforcement focus to individuals directly defrauding investors. The decision triggered a swift backlash from Democratic lawmakers, who argued it opened the door to sanctions evasion, drug trafficking, and large-scale financial fraud.

Blanche also holds reported personal crypto exposure of up to $485,000 — a detail that will almost certainly draw scrutiny from Congress as he leads the nation’s top law enforcement agency.

Advertisement

What changes at the DOJ

Blanche’s elevation to acting AG signals continuity — and likely intensification — of the DOJ’s current posture toward digital asset enforcement. The NCET, which handled major crypto fraud cases and supported cross-border law enforcement coordination, remains disbanded. Its closure, combined with the prior directive to deprioritize structural crypto enforcement, has already reshaped how federal prosecutors approach the space.

With Blanche now at the top, those policy choices become structurally harder to reverse regardless of who eventually takes the permanent AG role. Trump announced the change via Truth Social, describing Blanche as a “very talented and respected Legal Mind.” The White House has not yet specified a timeline for a permanent nomination, with EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin reportedly under consideration.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

US fighter jet shot down over Iran Bitcoin wavers

Published

on

Bitcoin investors face ‘harvest now, decrypt later’ quantum threat

A U.S. fighter jet identified as an F-15 was shot down over Iran on April 3, with one crew member rescued and President Trump briefed, adding a sharp new layer of escalation to a conflict that has already pushed Bitcoin down more than 40% from its October 2025 all-time high.

Summary

  • A US fighter jet, identified by CNN analysis as an F-15, was shot down over Iran on April 3, with one crew member rescued, according to sources cited by CNN.
  • The White House confirmed President Trump has been briefed, and Trump posted on X referencing reopening the Strait of Hormuz “with a little more time.”
  • Bitcoin, already trading near $67,000 amid weeks of war-driven pressure, faces renewed downside risk as oil markets prepare to price in the latest escalation.

A U.S. fighter jet identified as an F-15 was shot down over Iran on April 3, with one crew member rescued and President Trump briefed, adding a sharp new layer of escalation to a conflict that has already pushed Bitcoin (BTC) down more than 40% from its October 2025 all-time high. Iranian state media published images of the downed aircraft, which CNN analysis matched to an F-15. The White House press secretary confirmed that “President Trump has been briefed,” with live coverage updated at 1:12 p.m. EDT.

Bitcoin was trading near $67,000 at the time of writing, down modestly on the day. The downed aircraft adds a new variable to an already fragile macro backdrop. As crypto.news has tracked, Bitcoin has repeatedly tested the $65,000–$67,000 range as a support zone during periods of heightened U.S.–Iran tension, with sharper downside reserved for moments of genuine escalation — the initial U.S. strikes sent BTC briefly to $63,000 before markets stabilized.

Advertisement

The incident lands on Good Friday, with traditional U.S. equity markets closed for the Easter holiday. Oil, already trading above $100 per barrel amid the ongoing Strait of Hormuz closure, could spike sharply when Asian markets open overnight. A sustained move higher in oil would intensify inflation concerns and further reduce the Federal Reserve’s room to cut rates — a combination that has been the dominant headwind for crypto since the conflict began.

Trump’s Hormuz signal

In a separate post on X, Trump suggested the Strait of Hormuz could be reopened “with a little more time” — a statement investors read as leaving space for a negotiated resolution even as military operations continue. As crypto.news reported on April 2, Trump had addressed the nation from the White House describing U.S. forces as nearing the “final stages” of the campaign while warning of continued strikes over the following weeks. The contradiction between active military pressure and diplomatic signaling has kept markets in an uncertain holding pattern. For Bitcoin, any credible de-escalation — particularly one that restores Hormuz shipping and brings oil back below $100 — represents the single most significant potential catalyst for a sustained recovery from the current range.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

BTC USD Price Hanging in The Balance: What is Quantum Computer, and Can Bitcoin Survive it?

Published

on

🚨

BTC USD is hovering at the $66,000 – $67,000 price level, caught between a critical support floor and a quantum threat. The question isn’t just whether BTC can hold $66,000. It’s whether Bitcoin’s underlying cryptography survives the next decade of computing power. One risk is measured in weeks. The other, potentially in years. Both are moving faster than the market expects.

Quantum computing, the use of quantum mechanical phenomena to process information exponentially faster than classical computers, has shifted from theoretical threat to active development timeline. Google’s quantum milestones and competing programs from IBM and state-backed labs have reignited debate over Bitcoin’s SHA-256 hashing and elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA), the two pillars securing every wallet and transaction on the network.

Analysis of Google’s quantum paper found the crypto sector broadly underestimates the asymmetric risk. A sufficiently powerful quantum machine could, in theory, derive private keys from public addresses, rendering cold storage irrelevant. Bitcoin Core developers have acknowledged the long-term threat, with post-quantum cryptography upgrades discussed but no consensus timeline confirmed.

Advertisement

For now, BTC USD price action is the more immediate variable. Support at $66,000 is the line we should be watching.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Can BTC USD Price Recover Above $78,000, Or Is $50,000 the Next Target?

Bitcoin is sitting at $66,800–$67,000, effectively range-bound with no decisive momentum in either direction. Volume has compressed, a pattern that historically precedes either a sharp breakdown or a relief rally, rarely a slow grind higher.

Advertisement

The $66,000 level is load-bearing. Analysts flagged it as primary support, with a confirmed close below opening a path toward $50,000, or a 25% drawdown from current levels. On the upside, resistance clusters between $78,000 and $87,000 based on multiple technical models.

BTC USD is hovering at the $66,000 - $67,000 price level, caught between a critical support floor and a quantum threat.
BTC USD, Tradingview

BTC could always hold $66,000, reclaims $70,000 on volume, and momentum builds toward the $78,000 resistance zone ahead of Q2 macro catalysts. But a consolidation between $64,000–$70,000 through April, with direction determined by macro risk appetite and ETF flow data, could also be in play.

For bear, though, a daily close below $66,000 with elevated selling volume targets $58,000–$50,000 — invalidating the near-term recovery thesis entirely is on the wishlist.

Changelly’s April model prices in a potential peak near $78,020, suggesting the bull isn’t unreasonable, but it requires clean price action from here. The quantum threat adds a longer-term overhang that institutional allocators are quietly beginning to model into risk frameworks.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Advertisement

Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early Mover Upside as Bitcoin Tests Key Levels

BTC at $66,739 offers upside, but analyst consensus caps the near-term move at roughly 20% toward $80,000. For traders who’ve already been through the cycle, that’s a reasonable hold. For fresh capital seeking asymmetric exposure, it’s a different calculation entirely.

Bitcoin Hyper is positioning directly at the intersection of Bitcoin’s structural limitations and its quantum-era upgrade needs. The project bills itself as the first-ever Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, delivering sub-second finality and smart contract capabilities while anchored to Bitcoin’s security model.

The pitch is essentially: Bitcoin’s trust, Solana’s speed, without choosing between them. Addressing Bitcoin’s core bottlenecks, such as slow transactions, high fees, and zero native programmability, is the core use case. The quantum debate only reinforces the argument that Bitcoin’s infrastructure needs to evolve.

Advertisement

The presale has raised $32,262,965.45 at a current price of $0.013678, with high-APY staking available to early participants. Numbers at that raise level signal genuine demand — though presale projects carry significant execution risk and early pricing does not guarantee post-launch performance.

Traders researching the infrastructure angle can explore Bitcoin Hyper here.

The post BTC USD Price Hanging in The Balance: What is Quantum Computer, and Can Bitcoin Survive it? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

elon musks x deploys crypto scam kill switch

Published

on

Inside X Money, Elon Musk’s bid to fuse social media and banking

X is preparing to automatically lock any crypto scam account that mentions cryptocurrency for the first time in its posting history, with Head of Product Nikita Bier saying the measure should eliminate 99% of the economic incentive behind the platform’s most persistent category of fraud.

Summary

  • X Head of Product Nikita Bier confirmed on April 1 that the platform is implementing auto-locking and verification for any crypto scam account that posts about cryptocurrency for the first time in its history.
  • The measure is designed to remove the economic incentive behind scam accounts that hijack or newly weaponize established profiles to promote fraudulent crypto schemes.
  • Bier said the feature should kill 99% of the incentive, and also called out Google for failing to stop phishing emails at the inbox level.

X is preparing to automatically lock any crypto scam account that mentions cryptocurrency for the first time in its posting history, with Head of Product Nikita Bier saying the measure should eliminate 99% of the economic incentive behind the platform’s most persistent category of fraud. Bier confirmed the plan in an April 1 post on X replying to Benjamin White, founder of prediction market Predictfully, who publicly shared his account hack experience after a phishing email disguised as a copyright violation notice stole his credentials.

White’s experience is a textbook example of the attack pattern X is now targeting. His credentials were stolen through a fake login page that captured both his password and two-factor authentication code in real time. The hijacked account was then immediately redirected toward fraudulent crypto promotions — a sequence that has become standard practice among organized scam networks operating on the platform. “Yeah, we’re aware,” Bier wrote in reply. “We are in the process of implementing auto-locking + verification if a user posts about cryptocurrency for the first time in the history of their account. This should kill 99% of the incentive, especially since Google isn’t doing shit to stop the phishing.”

Advertisement

The scale of the problem

Crypto scams on X have intensified through 2026. In March, on-chain investigator ZachXBT traced a coordinated network of more than ten X accounts that used war-related panic posts to funnel users toward fraudulent crypto schemes, with on-chain evidence showing the cluster earned six figures from the campaign. Earlier in September 2025, X itself disclosed a bribery network in which scammers paid middlemen to reinstate suspended crypto fraud accounts, prompting legal action from the company.

How the feature works — and its limits

The auto-lock mechanism targets a specific and near-universal signature of scam activity: accounts with no prior history of crypto discussion suddenly posting promotional or transactional crypto content. By requiring verification before that first crypto post goes live, X introduces friction at the exact point where hijacked account abuse begins.

The feature does not appear to affect established accounts that already have a history of discussing crypto on the platform. Bier acknowledged that Google’s inaction on phishing emails remains a compounding vulnerability in the broader scam chain — one that X cannot fully control from its end alone.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Aave V3 Avoided Unrecovered Bad Debt From 2023 to 2025: Study

Published

on

Aave V3 Avoided Unrecovered Bad Debt From 2023 to 2025: Study

A Bank of Canada staff paper found that Aave V3 reported zero non-performing loans in 2024, with overcollateralization and automated liquidations helping prevent lender losses in its Ethereum lending market.

Using transaction-level data from Jan. 27, 2023, to May 6, 2025, the study found that positions were typically liquidated before collateral values fell below outstanding debt, helping contain lender losses across the sample.

But the model came with a tradeoff, the paper said. While it protected lenders from unrecovered losses, it also shifted risk onto borrowers and constrained capital efficiency compared with traditional lending systems.

According to the paper, Aave V3’s design relies on automated risk controls rather than traditional underwriting, requiring borrowers to post more collateral than they borrow and liquidating positions when they breach risk thresholds.

Advertisement
Daily lending earnings, circulating supply, and borrowing volumes (USD) on Aave V3. Source: Bank of Canada

Recursive leverage fueled borrowing demand

According to the paper, Aave V3’s lending activity was not driven solely by users seeking liquidity. It found that recursive leverage accounted for over 20% of total borrowed volume and 8.2% of borrowing transactions during the sample period. 

Recursive leverage involves repeatedly borrowing against collateral, redeploying the borrowed assets as new collateral and borrowing again to amplify exposure.

Related: Aave V4 goes live on Ethereum after governance vote clears rollout

The study said the dynamic made borrowers more exposed when markets turned. According to the paper, liquidations on Aave V3 tended to occur in concentrated waves, with four assets accounting for 90% of total liquidated value. 

This includes Wrapped Ether (WETH), Wrapped Staked Ether (wstETH), Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) and Wrapped eETH (weETH).

Advertisement

The paper estimated that borrower losses during major liquidation events could be significant. It said liquidation fees typically ranged from 5% to 10% of liquidated value, while missed gains from subsequent price recoveries pushed combined losses to about 10% to 30% in some cases. 

The staff paper suggested that while the design for Aave V3 helped prevent unrecovered bad debt in the sample, it did so by exposing borrowers to abrupt losses when collateral prices fell sharply. 

Cointelegraph reached out to Aave for comment but did not receive a response before publication.

Advertisement

Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?