Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Goldman Sachs-Backed Canton Links With LayerZero

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR

  • LayerZero has integrated its interoperability protocol with the Canton Network to support cross-chain asset transfers.
  • The Canton Network operates as a blockchain designed for regulated financial institutions and structured markets.
  • Goldman Sachs supports Digital Asset, the primary developer behind the Canton Network.
  • The integration enables institutions to route tokenized assets across more than 165 public blockchains.
  • LayerZero reported that its ecosystem represents over $100 billion in value.

LayerZero has launched its interoperability protocol on the Canton Network to enable cross-chain transfers for institutional users. The integration allows regulated financial firms to move tokenized assets across more than 165 public blockchains. Both organizations confirmed the development in a joint statement released Thursday.

Goldman Sachs and Institutional Backers Support Canton Expansion

Canton Network operates as a blockchain built for regulated financial institutions and structured markets. Digital Asset develops the network, and Goldman Sachs supports the company alongside other firms. Microsoft and DTCC also back Digital Asset as strategic supporters.

Digital Asset raised $135 million in June during a funding round led by DRW Venture Capital and Tradeweb Markets. BNP Paribas, Circle Ventures, Citadel Securities, DTCC, and Goldman Sachs joined the round. The company confirmed that nearly 400 ecosystem participants now engage with Canton.

Goldman Sachs Global Head of Digital Assets Mathew McDermott addressed the partnership last year. He said, “Our longstanding relationship with Digital Asset stems from a deep conviction in the strength of their technology.” His statement highlighted continued institutional backing for the platform.

LayerZero Enables Cross-Chain Routing for Tokenized Assets

LayerZero became the first interoperability protocol to go live on the Canton Network. The integration allows institutions in Canton to route tokenized assets securely across public blockchains. The organizations stated that the system maintains compliance and regulatory standards during transfers.

Advertisement

LayerZero designed its protocol to connect any token or application with any blockchain network. The company reported that its ecosystem represents over $100 billion in value. Through this link, that ecosystem can now access Canton’s institutional infrastructure.

Bryan Pellegrino, CEO of LayerZero Labs, outlined the operational scope of the integration. He said, “Canton has already built the rails for traditional finance, processing more than $350 billion in daily U.S. Treasury repo volume.” He added, “LayerZero’s job is to make sure those assets are available in every global market, across blockchains.”

BNP Paribas, DRW, Goldman Sachs, Liberty City Ventures, QCP, and Tradeweb have participated in testing Canton. The network confirmed ongoing collaboration with firms from both traditional and decentralized finance sectors. Canton stated that these participants contribute to network validation and infrastructure testing.

The integration now links institutional blockchain infrastructure with public networks through LayerZero’s protocol. Both organizations confirmed that institutions can transfer tokenized assets while retaining compliance controls. The companies released the announcement on Thursday as part of their joint update.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Kalshi Partners with ARK Invest to Meet Rising Institutional Demand for Prediction Markets

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Kalshi launches a formal market request pipeline to meet growing institutional investor demand.
  • ARK Invest partners with Kalshi to list prediction markets aligned with its investment research.
  • Live markets on Kalshi now cover non-farm payrolls, deficit-to-GDP ratios, and business KPIs.
  • Crowd-sourced prediction markets are becoming alternative data signals for major financial institutions.

Prediction markets are gaining traction among institutional investors, and Kalshi is now at the center of this shift. The platform has partnered with ARK Invest to list markets used in investment research and analysis.

Tarek Mansour, co-founder and CEO of Kalshi, confirmed the collaboration publicly. Several markets are already live, covering non-farm payrolls, deficit-to-GDP ratios, and business KPIs. The move reflects growing institutional appetite for crowd-sourced financial signals.

Kalshi’s Formal Pipeline Now Serves Institutional Demand

Kalshi has been witnessing a steady rise in institutional interest in prediction markets. To address this, the platform developed a formal market request pipeline for institutional partners.

This pipeline allows institutions to work directly with Kalshi to list relevant markets. The structure gives major investors a standardized way to access crowd-sourced economic data.

The partnership with ARK Invest is one of the earliest collaborations built through this pipeline. ARK Invest, known for its research-driven approach to disruptive innovation, is using Kalshi to support its analysis process.

Advertisement

Through the pipeline, ARK can request specific markets aligned with its investment focus. This creates a direct link between institutional research needs and market creation on the platform.

Mansour took to X to confirm the partnership and outline its scope. He wrote: “As institutional adoption of prediction markets grows, Kalshi is seeing increased demand for a formal market request pipeline to help investors leverage the wisdom of the crowd.” He added that ARK Invest is actively working through the pipeline to list markets used in analysis.

The collaboration also points to a wider pattern among financial institutions. More investors are turning to prediction markets as alternative data sources for decision-making.

Advertisement

These markets aggregate collective public intelligence around key economic events. Kalshi is positioning itself to serve that growing need at an institutional level.

Live Markets on Kalshi Already Supporting ARK’s Research Process

Several markets created through the ARK partnership are already active on Kalshi. Non-farm payroll markets are among the live options available to investors today.

Deficit-to-GDP ratio markets and business KPI markets are also accessible through the platform. These give institutions a real-time, crowd-sourced view of major economic indicators.

Non-farm payroll data is one of the most closely watched monthly economic figures. A prediction market around it lets institutions gauge crowd expectations before official government releases.

Advertisement

This forward-looking signal can help firms calibrate their strategies more accurately. ARK Invest is actively incorporating this data into its research process.

Deficit-to-GDP ratio markets offer macroeconomic visibility that traditional data providers rarely surface. Tracking this ratio helps investors assess long-term fiscal sustainability trends.

A crowd-sourced market around it gives institutions an independent read on public sentiment. That kind of alternative signal is increasingly valued in institutional investment circles.

Mansour closed his post by noting “more to come,” suggesting additional markets are being planned. Kalshi appears set to grow the pipeline and bring more institutional partners on board.

Advertisement

The platform’s ability to convert research needs into live markets sets it apart. As institutional adoption of prediction markets continues to grow, Kalshi’s pipeline model may become a standard tool for major investors.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Blockchain Philanthropy Fails Africa’s Real-World Test

Published

on

Blockchain Philanthropy Fails Africa’s Real-World Test

Opinion by: Samuel Owusu-Boadi, founder of WellsForAll

Over the past decade, crypto philanthropy has exploded. From a niche experiment to a transformative force channeling billions into global causes, crypto philanthropy’s moment has arrived.

According to data from The Giving Block, crypto donations exceeded $1 billion in 2024, proving that blockchain-based giving is now a legitimate, more transparent (in theory) and efficient alternative to traditional charity fundraising. While these figures show momentum, scale alone does not equate to success, especially in philanthropic projects across Africa.

Across the African continent, many crypto philanthropy initiatives are designed as moments — token launches, non-fungible token drops and campaigns designed to generate attention, capital and optimism in short bursts. These hype cycles rarely account for what happens after the launch window closes. No long-term systems are built to facilitate continued investment and oversight.

Advertisement

Why is this an issue? Public good projects cannot function on hype cycles. They require assets that endure for decades, with maintenance schedules, governance structures and local accountability.

There is no shortage of donation campaigns for philanthropic projects in Africa. What is lacking is long-lasting infrastructure. When philanthropy is structured around visibility rather than durability, the result is predictable: short-term relief followed by quiet failure.

The transparency illusion

Crypto philanthropy evangelists often point to blockchain’s transparency as a solution to these shortcomings. Onchain records can show where funds move, when they move and who authorized them. As valuable as this type of insight is, it is also incomplete.

Transparent records alone solve little without tangible truth on the ground. A transaction hash cannot confirm that infrastructure remains functional, that communities continue to benefit or that maintenance funding still exists. Blockchain systems can record intent, but they cannot verify tangible outcomes in the projects that crypto philanthropy seeks to enable. Academic research has highlighted that while blockchain may improve traceability, it does not automatically guarantee accountability or effect without additional systems that sit beside or within it to link the two.

Advertisement

Without on-the-ground presence and continuous oversight, onchain transparency risks becoming nothing more than performative in its credibility. Accountability must exist where the physical infrastructure exists, which means establishing frameworks outside of the distributed ledger that can track and measure tangible outputs. If effect is only measured at the transaction level, the most important question in any philanthropy project goes unanswered: Did lives meaningfully improve?

Ignoring local ownership makes failure inevitable

This gap between digital transparency and physical reality becomes more frustrating when projects are designed without the input from the communities they aim to serve. Many crypto philanthropy initiatives are conceived and executed by teams that have never visited the regions affected by their decisions.

Without local leadership overseeing these projects, responsibility evaporates once funding slows. Infrastructure that lacks community ownership will deteriorate quickly. Without clearly defined custodianship and locally managed maintenance resources, even well-funded projects deteriorate once initial enthusiasm fades.

At times, crypto-backed charitable initiatives in Africa treat local ownership as a cultural nicety, or an afterthought, rather than the heart and soul of the project. Communities must co-manage and protect assets if those assets are expected to survive. Projects that treat beneficiaries as end users rather than stewards inevitably collapse.

Advertisement

Charity tokens create dependency instead of dignity

Considering these observations, it becomes quite clear that most charity tokens and crypto fundraising models are designed to deliver temporary relief. They perform well at mobilizing attention and capital quickly but struggle to support systems that operate year after year.

Shifting the aim toward structural infrastructure enables philanthropic projects to function as a type of economic infrastructure, where longevity and sustainability are properly accounted for, and not merely as a charitable intervention. When clean water systems, schools or clinics remain operational over long periods, they reduce dependency rather than reinforce it.

Related: Ripple commits $25M to US school nonprofits

Dignity emerges not from receiving aid, but from creating systems from that aid that truly stand the test of time and endure.

Advertisement

Without long-term operational thinking, projects inadvertently recreate the very dependency dynamics they claim to disrupt.

Repeated failure harms the entire crypto industry

The consequences of these failures extend beyond individual projects. Whenever an initiative collapses, or public trust in a crypto-backed charity project erodes, not only is the power of philanthropy questioned, but so is belief in blockchain itself. With these failures, skepticism toward future crypto-powered initiatives only gets louder.

Africa experiences this damage the most. Failed experiments leave behind broken infrastructure and weakened confidence, making it harder for responsible models to gain support and traction. Philanthropy should never be treated as an experimental case study or showcase for blockchain technology. When human well-being is at stake, failure is not as abstract as we like to think.

For the crypto industry, this represents a credibility challenge. If blockchain is to play a meaningful role in global development, it must demonstrate discipline, restraint and accountability — not novelty for its own sake.

Advertisement

Maturity, not abandonment

With all this being said, is it time to abandon crypto philanthropy projects? Certainly not. Crypto advocates often highlight the advantages of digital assets in philanthropy, including borderless transfers, reduced transaction costs and immutable records. These benefits are real and largely undisputed.

For blockchain to contribute meaningfully to sustainable effects, then it must be treated as governance infrastructure rather than a marketing fundraising function. That means prioritizing local ownership, multi-year planning, maintenance funding and accountability frameworks that extend beyond the ledger.

Until crypto philanthropy builds systems instead of hype, it will continue to fail the communities it claims to serve.

Opinion by: Samuel Owusu-Boadi, founder of WellsForAll.

Advertisement