Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

How AI agents can transform DeFi trading without sacrificing user control

Published

on

How AI agents can transform DeFi trading without sacrificing user control

AI agents have moved from experimental tools to active participants in financial markets, and Neyro’s Andrew Isaacs has argued that decentralized finance could become one of the sectors where the technology proves its value most clearly.

Summary

  • Neyro COO Andrew Isaacs said DeFi trading offers a real-world test for AI agents because market decisions produce immediate financial outcomes.
  • Robinhood, Base, and Coinbase have launched agent-focused products that allow AI systems to execute transactions, monitor portfolios, and process payments under user-defined controls.
  • Isaacs argued that AI-driven automation in DeFi should preserve user ownership and decentralization rather than rely on custodial systems or centralized trust models.

Over recent weeks, several major companies have already started rolling out products designed around that same idea. 

Robinhood launched Agentic Trading and Agentic Credit Card services that allow approved AI agents to execute trades and purchases through dedicated accounts with user-defined limits. 

Advertisement

Coinbase-backed Base introduced Base MCP, a system that connects AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, and Cursor to crypto wallets for tasks ranging from token swaps to portfolio monitoring. 

Meanwhile, Coinbase has expanded its x402 payment infrastructure and agentic commerce initiatives, which CEO Brian Armstrong said could support an economy that eventually exceeds the scale of human commerce.

As AI agents take on more financial responsibilities, some industry participants believe decentralized finance could become one of the most important testing grounds for the technology.

Isaacs, who serves as the Chief Operating Officer at Neyro, a decentralized AI-powered crypto trading platform, believes trading presents conditions that quickly reveal whether AI systems can perform reliably when decisions carry real financial consequences.

Advertisement

“In many industries, an AI agent can save time. In trading, it can show whether this new model of automation is actually reliable under pressure,” Isaacs said in comments shared with crypto.news.

Unlike routine business workflows, trading requires continuous monitoring of market activity, interpretation of incoming data, and decision-making within predefined limits. Isaacs said those characteristics make markets a useful environment for evaluating how well AI agents operate outside controlled demonstrations.

“Trading is where small delays and bad judgment show up immediately,” Isaacs said. “That makes it a very honest environment for testing what AI agents can actually do.”

Fast-moving DeFi markets create a case for automation

Business interest in AI agents has already moved beyond experimentation. A McKinsey survey found that nearly two-thirds of companies are testing AI agents in their operations, while crypto firms have increasingly focused on ways to connect those systems with financial infrastructure.

Advertisement

For decentralized finance, Isaacs said the opportunity comes from the speed and complexity of crypto markets themselves.

“What stood out to me was the mismatch between how fast DeFi markets move and how manually most users still operate,” he said.

Around-the-clock trading, fragmented liquidity, and thousands of tokens spread across multiple blockchains have created an environment where keeping up with every opportunity is difficult for individual traders.

Advertisement

“A human trader cannot watch every pool, every token. But an AI agent can. That creates a very obvious use case for agentic systems,” Isaacs said.

Recent developments across the industry point to the same direction. Base MCP was introduced to help users manage crypto activity through AI chat interfaces while requiring transaction approvals before execution. 

Similarly, Isaacs’s Neyro is attempting to combine automation with decentralized infrastructure, allowing users to benefit from AI-driven trading without relying on custodial systems.

Coinbase has also highlighted the growing use of USDC and Base for machine-to-machine payments, stating during its first-quarter earnings call that AI agents use USDC in 99% of tracked transactions and conduct more than 90% of those payments on Base.

Advertisement

According to Coinbase, AI agents are already using x402 infrastructure for services such as trading, data access, AI inference, media generation, and storage. Official x402 statistics cited by the company showed monthly volumes surpassing 75 million transactions.

Why decentralized exchanges have lagged behind

Despite growing interest in AI-powered finance, Isaacs said decentralized exchanges have faced obstacles that centralized platforms do not.

Centralized trading environments allow developers to deploy AI systems within platforms that already have internal controls and safeguards. On decentralized exchanges, however, agents interact with non-custodial wallets and smart contracts where transactions are typically irreversible.

“There was also a trust problem. In CeFi, an AI system can sit behind an exchange account with internal controls. But on DEXs, AI touches wallets and smart contracts directly. A bad prompt or a misread market condition can become an irreversible transaction,” Isaacs said.

Advertisement

Security concerns surrounding AI agents have continued to attract attention across the industry. When Base launched MCP, the company emphasized that transactions require explicit user approval and that the system never accesses private keys. 

Separately, researchers from organizations including Google, Meta, Gray Swan AI, EmbraceTheRed, and several universities argued in a recent report that AI agents should be treated as untrusted components and isolated from sensitive instructions and data wherever possible.

Against that backdrop, Isaacs said the industry should be careful not to sacrifice decentralization in pursuit of convenience.

“AI is powerful enough to make centralization look convenient again, and that is the danger. The point of Web3 was never only to make financial products more digital. It was to change the trust model.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Strategy Didn’t Sell Bitcoin in May, According to Polymarket

Published

on

Polymarket has officially finalized one of this year’s most controversial events. It’s a prediction market on whether Strategy will sell Bitcoin in May, and it resolved to “No,” meaning that, according to the platform, the company didn’t sell BTC that month.

Here’s the kicker: the firm did sell BTC in May, as confirmed not only by its executives but also by an official filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. So what’s the reason for the resolution, you may ask? Well, the fact that confirmation came after the deadline. 

The decision rests entirely on the timing of the announcement. The filing came on June 1st (which is what literally everyone expected, because that’s when these filings are… filed), after the May 31 deadline had passed.

Polymarket’s decision has drawn massive criticism not only because of the outcome, but because the platform added a clarification after the market had closed, stating that announcements made after the deadline would not count toward resolution, as seen in the screenshot below.

Advertisement
Screenshot 2026-06-04 111513
Source: TradingView

What is even odder is that all subsequent time frames for the new markets for the same event lack this “additional context,” meaning traders can be easily misled again.

Critics argue that this effectively changed the market’s rules after traders had already taken their positions, which is objectively true. Many traders started taking positions on June 1st (which is after the deadline), because the market hadn’t been closed by Polymarket yet.

A May Sale, a June Filing

To give further context on the happening – at the center of this dispute is the difference between when an event took place and when it became publicly confirmed – these are two completely separate events. One is tied to an objective outcome; the other is tied to the announcement of that outcome. Had the event been framed as “MicroStrategy confirmed to have sold any of its Bitcoin by 11:59 PM ET on May 31,” then there is no room for interpretation.

But the market was “MicroStrategy sells any of its Bitcoin by 11:59 PM ET on May 31,” which they did. It was just announced later.

Polymarket didn’t treat the actual outcome as decisive – it treated the time of the announcement. Even though this distinction may seem technical, it has huge implications for traders. A market framed around whether a company sold Bitcoin can produce one answer if judged by the transaction date, and the opposite answer if judged by the disclosure date.

Advertisement

A Rule Changed After the Fact

What made this entire thing even more contentious is the fact that Polymarket added its “post-deadline announcements do not count” rule only after the market had been closed.

This raises very serious questions. Prediction markets depend on participants knowing the settlement criteria before they trade. Retroactively changing those criteria, especially after the relevant event has occurred, risks undermining confidence in the platform’s broader neutrality.

A trader claimed to have lost around $500K after backing the “Yes” side, while other observers criticized the decision. The controversy has also sparked broader concerns about how prediction markets handle events that occur before a deadline but are confirmed only afterward.

So, to put it in simple terms – Strategy did sell BTC in May according to its own filing. According to Polymarket, it didn’t.

Advertisement

The post Strategy Didn’t Sell Bitcoin in May, According to Polymarket appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

NVDA Shares Approach Strong Resistance

Published

on

NVDA Shares Approach Strong Resistance

Production of NVIDIA processors is concentrated in Taiwan via TSMC, making the company sensitive to US trade policy. In the first quarter of fiscal 2026, NVIDIA recorded a $4.5bn write-down due to restrictions on H20 chip exports to China. At the same time, the revenue structure remains resilient — around 69% of revenue comes from the US domestic market, where hyperscalers continue to increase purchases of accelerators for data centres.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, revenue reached $68.1bn, representing a 73% year-on-year increase, while full-year revenue totalled $215.9bn (+65%). In late March, the company announced an expansion of its strategic partnership with Marvell Technology, including a $2bn investment and integration via the NVLink Fusion ecosystem, further extending its presence in the Physical AI and robotics segment. However, the overall macroeconomic backdrop remains subdued.

Technical picture

After reaching an all-time high near 210 in November 2025, the stock entered a corrective phase. The low of this correction was marked at 165 on 30 March 2026. A rebound followed from this level; however, the price remains around 177, without showing a convincing recovery. The horizontal volume profile provides further clarity.

The highest concentration of trading activity over the period under review is located in the 181–183 zone, where the point of control (POC) is situated. This area reflects the most active trading over several months, making it a key reference zone for market participants. Above current levels, the volume profile remains dense up to 189, which coincides with the local highs from the second half of 2025 and acts as the nearest resistance level.

The RSI stands at 49.37 and remains in neutral territory, offering no clear directional advantage. The latest session’s volume reached 107.11 million shares, indicating sustained market participation. However, it should be noted that the most pronounced spikes in volume and volatility have historically occurred ahead of and following quarterly earnings releases. As a result, the stock may continue to consolidate within the current range until new fundamental catalysts emerge.

Advertisement

Key takeaways

NVIDIA remains in a prolonged consolidation phase, supported by strong operational performance but a muted macroeconomic backdrop. The volume profile shows a significant supply overhang above current price levels, while the RSI does not favour either side. Market participants continue to assess incoming signals without committing to a sustained directional bias.

Buy and sell stocks of the world’s biggest publicly-listed companies with CFDs on FXOpen’s trading platform. Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading share CFDs with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Why Bitcoin price could fall below $62,000 despite oversold conditions

Published

on

Bitcoin slips to $75k as Fed holds rates, crypto stocks tumble
Bitcoin drops towards $62,000
  • Bitcoin ETF outflows remain negative for 11 straight days, pressuring BTC.
  • $749 million in liquidations have accelerated the Bitcoin price drop.
  • RSI below 18 shows oversold conditions, but trend stays bearish.

Bitcoin (BTC) has been under sustained pressure, trading around the $63,548 level after a sharp multi-week decline that has erased a large portion of its recent recovery.

Notably, the BTC price decline reflects a combination of institutional selling, forced liquidations, and weakening market structure that continues to dominate short-term price action.

Even though technical indicators now show deeply oversold conditions, the broader flow of capital suggests that downside risk remains active.

The current setup places Bitcoin in a zone where short-term relief rallies are possible, but sustained recovery has yet to form.

Bitcoin ETF outflows weigh heavily on the BTC price

One of the most consistent pressures on Bitcoin has been the ongoing withdrawal of capital from US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.

Advertisement

Data shows a stretch of 11 consecutive days of net outflows, including a single-day redemption of roughly $519 million on June 2.

Over the past ten days from May 25, 2026 to June 3, 2026, Bitcoin ETFs have witnessed over 3 billion worth of outflows according to CoinGlass data.

This pattern has effectively removed a major source of steady institutional demand.

According to Citi analysts, ETF flows account for about 45% of weekly return variation, highlighting how strongly prices now respond to institutional positioning.

Advertisement

With flows turning negative for nearly two weeks, Bitcoin has been left without its primary demand driver at a time when selling pressure is already elevated.

This shift is important because ETFs were previously absorbing large amounts of Bitcoin supply during the recovery phase.

The current reversal means that instead of acting as a stabilizing force, ETFs are now contributing to downside momentum.

Without a clear return of net inflows, price stability above the mid-$60,000 range has remained difficult to sustain.

Advertisement

Liquidations and macro pressure amplify the decline

Alongside ETF outflows, leveraged positions in the derivatives market have added fuel to the downturn.

More than $749.982 million in leveraged long positions have been liquidated within a 24-hour window during the sell-off, according to market data.

Bitcoin liquidations

These forced closures have accelerated price movement lower rather than allowing gradual adjustment.

Bitcoin’s drop below key technical zones has triggered additional selling, reinforcing a cascading effect where falling prices lead to further liquidation pressure.

Advertisement

At the same time, macroeconomic conditions have reduced the overall appetite for risk assets.

Strong US employment data has pushed expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts further into the future, reinforcing a “higher-for-longer” interest rate environment.

This has reduced liquidity flowing into speculative markets, including crypto.

In addition, geopolitical tensions, particularly renewed instability involving Iran and broader global risk concerns, have also contributed to defensive positioning across financial markets.

Advertisement

In this environment, Bitcoin has continued to trade in line with high-risk assets rather than acting independently.

Technical structure shows oversold conditions but no confirmed reversal

From a technical perspective, Bitcoin is showing some of the most extreme oversold readings in recent months.

The 14-day Relative Strength Index has dropped to around 17.7–18, a level that typically reflects heavy selling exhaustion.

Historically, readings this low have often preceded short-term relief rallies.

Advertisement

However, other technical indicators present a more cautious picture.

Bitcoin is currently trading below all major exponential moving averages, including the 10-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day EMAs. This alignment signals a strong bearish trend across multiple timeframes.

Bitcoin price chart

Looking at the short-term Bitcoin price projections, the immediate support zone sits near $62,964, while a broader structural floor is located around the $60,000 region, which also aligns with long-term trend indicators.

A breakdown below $62,964 would increase the likelihood of a move toward lower liquidity zones near $60,000 and potentially $55,000.

Advertisement

On the upside, Bitcoin would need to close above $69,124 to shift short-term momentum. If that level is reclaimed, the next resistance zone is positioned near $71,589, which would signal early signs of structural recovery.

But until then, the trend remains heavily influenced by downside momentum rather than reversal signals.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Buying Falls 80% as ETF Outflows Hit a 17-Session Streak

Published

on

Total Ethereum Spot ETF Net Inflow

Ethereum price has slid about 10% over the past week as on-chain demand collapsed and liquidations spiked.

The chain is clear. Spot ETFs have bled for 17 straight sessions, the most loyal holders pulled back hard, and stretched funding then set off forced selling.

Ethereum Spot ETF Outflows Set the Stage

The selling started with the institutions. Ethereum spot ETF demand has vanished, with the funds now bleeding for 17 straight sessions.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Advertisement

The last day of net inflows was May 8. Every trading day since has been an outflow, and the latest reading showed about $52.94 million leaving the funds.

Total Ethereum Spot ETF Net Inflow
Total Ethereum Spot ETF Net Inflow: SoSoValue

That run has cut total ETF net assets to roughly $9.96 billion. A streak this long is the clearest sign yet of institutional apathy toward ETH. When the steadiest buyers disappear for weeks, other holders take notice. The most loyal on-chain cohort cracked next.

Long-Term Holders Slash Their Buying

The most patient holders followed the institutions out. Glassnode’s hodler net position change tracks the monthly change in supply held by coins older than 155 days. It had been climbing into June.

It peaked at 339,222 ETH on June 1, the start of the new month. By June 3, it had collapsed to 68,470 ETH as they possibly felt that the ETF demand was returning.

That is a drop of about 80% in two days. Even the most loyal holders sharply slowed their buying, pulling a key source of demand out of the market.

Advertisement
ETH Hodler Net Position Change
ETH Hodler Net Position Change: Glassnode

With both institutions and hodlers stepping back, the door opened for leverage to do damage.

Funding Rates Spike and Liquidations Pile Up

Thin spot demand left the market leaning on leverage. CryptoQuant flagged that Ethereum funding rates on Binance hit their highest level since early 2026.

Funding rate is the periodic payment between traders holding long and short perpetual futures. A high positive rate means longs are crowded and paying to keep their bets open. CryptoQuant warned the setup raised the risk of long liquidations as Bitcoin slid. That risk played out fast.

Over the past 24 hours, about $368.63 million in Ethereum long positions were liquidated, or force closed. That was part of a $1.61 billion wipeout across crypto.

Advertisement
Crypto Liquidation Heatmap
Crypto Liquidation Heatmap: CoinGlass

With demand gone and forced selling underway, the price chart shows where the damage landed.

Ethereum Price Levels to Watch After the Breakdown

The Ethereum price chart explains the cascade. Ethereum price broke down on June 2, slicing below the neckline of an inverted cup and handle.

An inverted cup and handle is a bearish reversal pattern, a rounded top followed by a small handle. It projects a downside target once the neckline breaks. The measured drop is about 21%.

That bearish target sits near $1,550. ETH now trades near $1,795 after the breakdown, with a long lower wick showing some buyers returned.

Ethereum Price Analysis
Ethereum Price Analysis: TradingView

The setup stays bearish on the breakdown path. A fall of about 5% under $1,714 would open the way toward $1,550.

To turn the tide, ETH must reclaim $1,893 and then $2,004. A move back above $2,004 would erase most of the recent losses.

Advertisement

Still, sell volume remains steady, so the weakness likely holds until buyers reclaim $1,893. For now, $1,714 separates a slide toward $1,550 from a recovery attempt back toward the $2,000 zone.

The post Ethereum Buying Falls 80% as ETF Outflows Hit a 17-Session Streak appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Delphi Says Airdrops Are Over as 94% of Wallets Dump Within 90 Days

Published

on

Delphi Says Airdrops Are Over as 94% of Wallets Dump Within 90 Days

Delphi Digital says the airdrops are over, after finding that 78% to 94% of recipient wallets across six major tokens sold most of their allocation within 90 days.

The research firm tracked 3.7 million wallets over five years, arguing that free token giveaways now produce sellers rather than committed holders.

Are Airdrops Dead? Delphi Says Up to 94% of Wallets Dump Within 90 Days

Airdrops became a standard way for projects to seed communities and reward early users. However, the model has faced scrutiny lately.

Delphi studied Uniswap (UNI), Arbitrum (ARB), Jupiter (JUP), and Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), among other tokens spread across four chains. Exit rates rose over time rather than settling down.

Advertisement

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Holders Selling Tokens After an Airdrop. Source: X/Delphi Digital

Delphi found real dump rates ran 4 to 11 percentage points higher at day 90 than at day 30. The widely cited 30-day figure, therefore, understates the number of recipients who leave.

The firm made four core arguments for why it could get worse for airdrops. First, the cost of running fake “sybil” wallets is collapsing toward zero as automated tools make farming cheap and detection unreliable. 

Second, the next wave of issuers, including tokenized treasuries and regulated DeFi, won’t send tokens to anonymous wallets. Third, the acquisition math fails, with Arbitrum paying an estimated $1.16 billion to users who left within a month. 

Finally, the firm also said that outlier wins prove little. Hyperliquid (HYPE) absorbed sales through buybacks, funded by more than $1 billion in revenue. Jito (JTO) avoided farming because its eligible group stayed small.

Advertisement

“Token economics are starting to require real protocol performance. MegaETH locked 53% of its supply behind performance targets. Pendle routes roughly 80% of revenue into buybacks for stakers. Token distribution is moving from handouts to performance,” Delphi added.

Independent tracking had already pointed the same way. A trader previously logged 30 airdrops received since December 2024, finding only one still trading above its launch price at the time. Several had collapsed almost entirely, reinforcing the pattern.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Delphi Says Airdrops Are Over as 94% of Wallets Dump Within 90 Days appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Uber (UBER) Pours Nearly $500M Into Nuro for Massive Robotaxi Expansion

Published

on

UBER Stock Card

Key Takeaways

  • Uber has allocated approximately $500 million to self-driving technology firm Nuro via a combination of upfront capital and performance-based payments.
  • This arrangement forms part of a trilateral partnership involving Nuro and Lucid to launch 35,000 autonomous taxis across Uber’s platform.
  • These vehicles will utilize Lucid Gravity SUVs equipped with Nuro’s autonomous driving technology.
  • Nuro has successfully achieved its initial benchmarks, triggering the release of the first installment of performance-tied financing.
  • Future disbursements depend on driverless trials scheduled for later this year, completely autonomous passenger services by year’s end, and expanded deployment in 2027.

On June 4, Reuters disclosed that Uber Technologies (UBER) has pledged approximately $500 million to self-driving vehicle developer Nuro, according to confidential sources. UBER stock registered a 0.10% gain following the announcement.


UBER Stock Card
Uber Technologies, Inc., UBER

This financial commitment exceeds Uber’s original contribution and combines equity investment with performance-contingent funding mechanisms. The move expands upon Uber’s involvement in Nuro’s $203 million financing round, which assigned the startup a $6 billion valuation.

Nuro’s investor roster includes Nvidia and SoftBank, providing substantial financial backing as the company accelerates its self-driving technology initiatives.

The central objective involves deploying 35,000 autonomous taxis built on Lucid Gravity SUVs, alongside upcoming midsize vehicle variants. These automobiles will incorporate Nuro’s autonomous driving platform and function within Uber’s ride-sharing ecosystem.

Uber previously announced a $500 million investment in Lucid, positioning itself as a significant financial participant throughout various segments of the value chain — spanning vehicle manufacturing, software development, and service delivery.

Performance Benchmarks Trigger Initial Funding

The performance-based component of this agreement follows a structured framework built around specific development and operational objectives. Reuters’ sources indicate that Nuro has already met the first series of these predetermined targets.

Advertisement

This achievement has triggered the distribution of the initial performance-contingent capital allocation to Nuro. Subsequent payments hinge on conducting driverless trials later this year, launching completely autonomous passenger services before December, and implementing widespread service availability in 2027.

Nuro is presently conducting trials with safety operators in California’s San Francisco Bay Area in preparation for a public launch scheduled for later this year.

This past April, Nuro obtained California regulatory approval to test autonomous Lucid Gravity vehicles without safety operators across designated counties. The following month in May, the company secured permission to transport passengers during supervised trial operations.

Nuro Transitions From Package Delivery to Passenger Transport

Nuro initially developed compact autonomous delivery vehicles before strategically shifting in 2024 toward licensing its self-driving software to automotive manufacturers and transportation service providers. The Uber partnership represents a cornerstone of this strategic realignment.

Advertisement

This robotaxi deployment would constitute a significant milestone in that transformation, repositioning Nuro from a specialized delivery solution provider to a competitive force in the passenger transportation sector.

Meanwhile, Uber maintains a diversified strategy across multiple autonomous vehicle collaborations. The company has established self-driving partnerships with Baidu, Rivian, and Wayve, while also facilitating Waymo services in specific American markets.

UBER’s present price-to-earnings ratio stands at 17.88, accompanied by a GF Score of 83 out of 100. Recent insider transactions over the previous three months reveal $2.2 million in stock disposals, including a single sale of 30,000 shares.

Nuro’s latest California regulatory clearance, issued in May, permitted passenger transport during supervised testing phases — an essential prerequisite before launching any completely driverless commercial operations.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Alphabet (GOOGL) Shares Dip Following Record-Breaking $84.75B AI Funding Round

Published

on

GOOGL Stock Card

Key Highlights

  • Google’s parent company completed an $84.75 billion equity financing round — marking the biggest AI-linked capital raise in market history
  • The final amount exceeded the originally announced $80 billion target and features a $10 billion private transaction with Berkshire Hathaway
  • Major Wall Street firms Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley served as joint book-running managers
  • Anthony Gutman, Goldman Sachs International co-CEO, described the transaction as entering “unprecedented territory” in capital markets
  • Shares of GOOGL finished Wednesday’s session down 0.76% at $358.68 as market participants assessed potential shareholder dilution

Shares of Alphabet (GOOGL) ended Wednesday’s trading session at $358.68, declining 0.76% following the tech giant’s decision to expand its equity fundraising to $84.75 billion — a significant increase from the $80 billion initially disclosed earlier this week.


GOOGL Stock Card
Alphabet Inc., GOOGL

This fundraising represents one of the most substantial equity capital events ever executed in connection with artificial intelligence expansion. In an exclusive conversation with CNBC, Anthony Gutman, co-CEO of Goldman Sachs International, characterized the transaction as pushing capital markets into uncharted waters.

“Let’s start by saying this is unprecedented territory, so we all enter it with a degree of humility and caution,” Gutman said in an exclusive interview Wednesday on CNBC’s Europe Early Edition.

The stock experienced downward pressure as market participants digested the implications of shareholder dilution. By expanding the total share count, existing stockholders face potential value compression unless the company delivers returns that justify the increased capital base.

The company stated the proceeds will be deployed toward AI computational infrastructure to address what it characterized as “unprecedented customer demand.” Its Gemini application has attracted nearly 900 million monthly active users.

Within the broader offering, Berkshire Hathaway committed $10 billion through a private placement arrangement. Under the leadership of Greg Abel, who succeeded Warren Buffett, Berkshire is providing anchor investor support for the transaction.

The trio of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are managing the underwritten component as joint book-runners. Goldman additionally serves as the placement agent for the private portion.

Advertisement

Investor Sentiment and Market Reception

According to Gutman, demand from institutional investors for substantial equity issuances continues at elevated levels. When evaluated as a proportion of overall equity market capitalization, the offering appears “very manageable,” he noted.

“The Alphabet issuance yesterday augurs well for the pipeline. That was just a record level of issuance on any level,” he added.

Broader market indices displayed mixed performance on Wednesday. The S&P 500 retreated 0.74% to finish at 7,553.68. The technology-heavy Nasdaq declined 0.89%, closing at 26,854.

Among technology sector competitors, Meta posted gains of 4.24%, ending at $622.98. Microsoft experienced a 3.17% decline to close at $427.34.

The Broader Capital Markets Environment

Alphabet’s capital raise arrives as 2026 positions itself to become a banner year for capital markets transactions.

Advertisement

SpaceX has scheduled its initial public offering for June 12, pursuing a $1.75 trillion valuation on the Nasdaq exchange — which would establish it as the largest IPO in financial market history.

Artificial intelligence companies OpenAI and Anthropic have similarly revealed intentions to pursue public listings before year-end.

Gutman referred to these as “exceptional companies” and expressed confidence in their ability to successfully raise capital provided they execute the process correctly.

Since its 2004 market debut, Alphabet’s stock has appreciated 14,202%. The company currently commands a market capitalization of $4.3 trillion.

Wednesday’s trading activity for GOOGL occurred within a range of $358.10 to $366.39, with approximately 2 million shares changing hands — substantially below the 28.9 million share average daily trading volume.

Advertisement

Investors will be closely monitoring the company’s forthcoming quarterly earnings release and capital spending projections to evaluate whether returns from AI infrastructure investments will validate the massive capital deployment.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Over $600M in Bitcoin Longs Liquidated As BTC Price Nears $60K

Published

on

Over $600M in Bitcoin Longs Liquidated As BTC Price Nears $60K

Bitcoin’s (BTC) brief plunge toward the $60,000 area triggered more than $600 million in long liquidations, raising doubts over whether the latest rebound marks a real bottom or only a relief bounce after a leverage flush.

BTC price may rebound toward $70,000 next

BTC fell to roughly $61,300 on Thursday before recovering 5.52% to around $64,690, with the rebound coinciding with reports that Israel and Lebanon had agreed to implement a ceasefire.

BTC/USD four-hour chart. Source: TradingView

The volatile move liquidated over $737 million in BTC positions on a 24-hour rolling basis, with long traders taking most of the hit, according to data resource CoinGlass.

BTC total liquidations. Source: CoinGlass

Over $617 million in long positions were wiped out, showing how aggressively bullish traders were positioned before the sell-off.

Advertisement

Still, Bitcoin’s sharp 5.52% rebound encouraged some traders to call for a bottom.

Trader RidaaXBT said BTC could stage a relief bounce toward the $69,000–$70,000 range, implying that the liquidation-driven selloff may have exhausted near-term sellers.

Related: Analyst says Bitcoin’s $60K bottom signals weaken bear-market forecast

Analyst ZordXBT shared a similar view, pointing to Bitcoin’s long downside wick as a sign that buyers stepped in aggressively near the lows.

Advertisement

Source: X

On the other hand, crypto trader Hitman42.eth warned that BTC bulls may be celebrating too early, noting that the Bitcoin bounce may end up trapping bulls.

Source: X

Bitcoin bear flag keeps $50K target in play

Bitcoin’s weekly chart still shows a bear flag breakdown in progress, keeping the risk of a deeper drop toward the $50,000–$52,000 area alive. The setup follows BTC’s failure to reclaim the flag’s upper trend line, with rising volumes adding weight to the downside move.

BTC/USD weekly chart. Source: TradingView

However, the bearish scenario is not confirmed as long as BTC trades above its 200-week simple moving average (200-week SMA, blue line) at around $61,800. This level has acted as a major cycle-bottom zone in past Bitcoin bear markets, including 2015, 2018 and 2020.

A strong rebound from the 200-week SMA would weaken, or potentially invalidate, the bear flag breakdown, putting BTC price in position to test $70,000 as the next upside target.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Why Wall Street Is Quietly Studying DeFi

Published

on

Why Wall Street Is Quietly Studying DeFi

Lessons Traditional Finance Can Learn from Decentralized Finance

For years, the relationship between Wall Street and Decentralized Finance (DeFi) seemed adversarial.

Traditional finance (TradFi) viewed DeFi as an experimental corner of the internet filled with speculative assets, anonymous developers, and untested protocols. Meanwhile, DeFi advocates often portrayed banks and financial institutions as outdated middlemen destined to be replaced by code.

Yet beneath the headlines and ideological debates, something interesting has been happening.

Many of the world’s largest financial institutions have begun studying, testing, and in some cases adopting concepts pioneered by DeFi.

Advertisement

The reason is simple: DeFi has become one of the largest real-world experiments in financial infrastructure ever conducted. It has processed trillions of dollars in transactions, coordinated global liquidity without centralized operators, and demonstrated new models for market-making, lending, settlement, and asset ownership.

Wall Street may not be embracing DeFi publicly, but it is paying close attention.

DeFi Built Financial Infrastructure from Scratch

Traditional financial systems evolved over decades.

Banks, clearinghouses, brokers, custodians, payment processors, and regulators all became layers within a complex ecosystem. While this structure provides stability, it also creates friction.

Advertisement

A simple securities transaction can require multiple intermediaries, delayed settlement periods, and extensive reconciliation between institutions.

DeFi approached the problem differently.

Instead of building around institutions, it built around programmable rules.

Smart contracts automate functions traditionally handled by intermediaries:

Advertisement
  • Lending
  • Borrowing
  • Trading
  • Settlement
  • Collateral management
  • Yield distribution

The result is a financial system capable of operating continuously, globally, and transparently.

For Wall Street, this raises an important question:

What if financial infrastructure could become software?

The Efficiency of 24/7 Markets

Traditional financial markets have operating hours.

Stock exchanges close. Banks observe weekends. International transfers can take days.

Advertisement

DeFi never sleeps.

Protocols operate twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, across every time zone.

Liquidity remains accessible regardless of geography, holidays, or business hours.

While regulators and institutions may not be ready for fully nonstop markets, they recognize the efficiency advantages.

Advertisement

As global finance becomes increasingly digital, the expectation of continuous access may become difficult to ignore.

Transparency as a Competitive Advantage

One of DeFi’s most overlooked innovations is radical transparency.

In traditional finance, market participants often operate with limited visibility into:

  • Liquidity positions
  • Counterparty risk
  • Reserve holdings
  • Settlement activity

DeFi changes that.

Every transaction is publicly verifiable on-chain.

Advertisement

Users can inspect protocol reserves, lending activity, treasury balances, and historical performance in real time.

Transparency does not eliminate risk.

However, it significantly reduces information asymmetry.

For institutions increasingly focused on compliance, auditing, and risk management, transparent systems offer powerful advantages.

Advertisement

Automated Market Making Changed Liquidity

Perhaps no DeFi innovation has attracted more institutional attention than Automated Market Makers (AMMs).

Before DeFi, electronic markets largely relied on order books and professional market makers.

Protocols such as automated liquidity pools demonstrated that liquidity could be supplied algorithmically by participants worldwide.

This innovation transformed how markets could function.

Advertisement

Even institutions that never directly interact with decentralized exchanges have studied AMM mechanics because they reveal alternative approaches to liquidity provision.

The broader lesson is that market infrastructure can be redesigned rather than merely optimized.

Instant Settlement Is Hard to Ignore

One of the highest costs in traditional finance comes from settlement delays.

Trades often require multiple layers of verification and clearing before final ownership is finalized.

Advertisement

DeFi introduced near-instant settlement.

Transactions execute, settle, and become visible on-chain within minutes or seconds.

This dramatically reduces:

  • Counterparty risk
  • Operational complexity
  • Capital lock-up requirements
  • Reconciliation costs

Financial institutions have taken notice because settlement efficiency directly impacts profitability.

The possibility of tokenized securities settling in real time is becoming an increasingly serious topic among banks and asset managers.

Advertisement

Tokenization Is the Bridge Between Worlds

Among all DeFi concepts, tokenization may have the greatest long-term impact.

Tokenization transforms real-world assets into blockchain-based representations.

Examples include:

  • Real estate
  • Bonds
  • Stocks
  • Commodities
  • Private credit
  • Money market funds

For Wall Street, tokenization offers a path toward:

  • Faster settlement
  • Fractional ownership
  • Increased liquidity
  • Global accessibility
  • Reduced administrative overhead

Rather than replacing traditional assets, tokenization modernizes how those assets move through financial systems.

This is one reason many institutions are exploring blockchain infrastructure despite remaining cautious about cryptocurrencies themselves.

Advertisement

Open Innovation Moves Faster

Traditional finance often innovates through large organizations, lengthy approval processes, and significant regulatory oversight.

DeFi innovates through open-source collaboration.

Developers worldwide can contribute improvements, launch new protocols, or experiment with novel economic models.

This creates a rapid feedback loop.

Advertisement

Ideas are tested in months rather than years.

Not every experiment succeeds.

In fact, many fail.

But the pace of innovation remains unmatched.

Advertisement

Wall Street increasingly understands that some of the most valuable financial innovations may emerge from open networks rather than corporate research departments.

What TradFi Should Learn

The most important lesson is not that banks should become decentralized.

It is hoped that financial infrastructure can become more efficient, transparent, and programmable.

TradFi can learn from DeFi in several key areas:

Advertisement

1. Transparency Builds Trust

Users increasingly expect visibility into how systems operate.

2. Automation Reduces Costs

Smart contracts demonstrate how software can replace manual processes.

3. Settlement Speed Matters

Capital efficiency improves when transactions settle faster.

4. Open Systems Accelerate Innovation

Collaborative development can uncover solutions faster than closed ecosystems.

Advertisement

5. Global Accessibility Creates Opportunity

Financial services no longer need to be constrained by geography.

Conclusion

The future of finance is unlikely to be purely traditional or purely decentralized.

Instead, it will probably be a hybrid system that combines the strengths of both worlds.

Traditional finance brings regulatory experience, institutional trust, and deep pools of capital.

Advertisement

DeFi contributes transparency, programmability, efficiency, and innovation.

That is why Wall Street is quietly studying DeFi.

Not because decentralized finance has already won, but because it has proven that many assumptions about how financial systems must operate are no longer fixed.

The institutions that learn these lessons early may be the ones that define the next generation of global finance.

Advertisement
REQUEST AN ARTICLE

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

WISeKey (WKEY) Shares Drop as WISeSat Progresses Toward Nasdaq Launch Under WSAT Symbol

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Takeaways

  • WISeKey shares retreat as WISeSat subsidiary progresses with Nasdaq listing under WSAT symbol.

  • Satellite subsidiary submits updated confidential SEC registration for anticipated public market debut.

  • Stock faces downward pressure following disclosure of SPAC transaction advancement.

  • WISeSat pursues independent Nasdaq presence through WSAT ticker while parent company shares decline.

  • Parent company experiences continued selloff as satellite unit completes regulatory filing milestone.

Shares of WISeKey International Holding (WKEY) declined following disclosure of a regulatory filing advancement for its satellite subsidiary WISeSat’s forthcoming Nasdaq debut. The stock settled at $8.25, representing a 6.99% decrease, and continued sliding to $8.17 during pre-market activity. The decline reflected investor concerns surrounding the proposed space technology merger transaction.

WISeKey International Holding AG, WKEY

Satellite Subsidiary Progresses With Public Market Plans

According to WISeKey’s announcement, WISeSat.Space Holdings Corp. filed an updated confidential Form F-4 registration draft with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2026. This submission advances the satellite company’s merger with Columbus Acquisition Corp. Upon deal completion, the merged entity anticipates commencing Nasdaq trading operations under the WSAT ticker symbol.

The transaction stems from a Business Combination Agreement executed November 9, 2025, involving WISeSat, CAC, Pubco, WISeKey, and WISeSat Merger Sub Corp. Following consummation, both WISeSat and CAC will operate as Pubco subsidiaries. The arrangement remains contingent upon SEC clearance, Columbus Acquisition shareholder consent, and Nasdaq listing authorization.

Advertisement

The satellite division operates via WISeSat.Space AG, concentrating on protected orbital infrastructure solutions. Its mission encompasses secure communications channels, digital authentication systems, encrypted data transmission, and defense-oriented space technologies. The enterprise leverages WISeKey’s established expertise in cybersecurity protocols, identity verification, and semiconductor engineering.

Parent Company Shares Decline Despite Regulatory Milestone

Trading activity for WKEY remained bearish following the filing disclosure. Shares concluded regular trading at $8.25 following the 6.99% drop, then extended losses by 0.96% before market open. This movement brought the pre-market price to $8.17, demonstrating persistent selling pressure.

The negative market response accompanied the transaction’s progression into additional regulatory stages. While a confidential amended registration draft represents forward movement, it doesn’t finalize the combination. Furthermore, the public Form F-4 remains pending effectiveness with the SEC.

WISeKey disclosed the advisory team supporting the merger. Maxim Group LLC serves as sole financial advisor to WISeKey. Legal counsel includes Ellenoff Grossman & Schole representing WISeSat and Pubco, alongside Loeb & Loeb advising CAC.

Advertisement

Company Overview and Strategic Direction

WISeKey’s core operations span cybersecurity solutions, digital identity platforms, and internet-connected device security. The company maintains dual listings under WIHN on Switzerland’s SIX Exchange and WKEY on Nasdaq. Its WISeSat division represents expansion into orbital secure connectivity infrastructure.

The satellite subsidiary focuses on quantum-resistant communication networks delivered through protected space-based systems. WISeSat intends to integrate orbital services with verification technologies, digital identity frameworks, and protected information exchange protocols. Target markets include government agencies, corporate entities, and industries requiring encrypted communications.

The planned WSAT listing would establish WISeSat as an independent publicly-traded entity. Nevertheless, the arrangement awaits final documentation and shareholder authorization. During this interim period, WKEY shares remain under selling pressure as investors evaluate transaction completion risks.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025