Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

HTX Delists Trump Family’s USD1 Token Amid Asset-Freeze Dispute

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

HTX, the crypto exchange linked to Justin Sun, has delisted the USD1 stablecoin issued by World Liberty Financial (WLFI) after asserting that WLFI froze HTX on-chain addresses in a sanctions-related review. In its update, HTX said WLFI’s project team unilaterally imposed a freeze on specific HTX on-chain addresses, restricting the on-chain circulation of WLFI assets tied to those addresses. As a result, HTX stopped accepting deposits or conversions of USD1 and announced a 1:1 conversion of USD1 holdings into Tether (USDT), with exact timing and procedures to be announced later. The exchange also suspended trading pairs involving USD1 or WLFI and stated it would pursue safeguards for user assets through potential legal remedies.

HTX’s decision arrives amid heightened regulatory pressure on crypto platforms in Europe and beyond. In late May, the United Kingdom designated HTX (formerly Huobi Global) under sanctions criteria, citing “reasonable grounds to suspect” that the exchange had supported Russia’s government through financial services. HTX has maintained that the sanctioned entity is Huobi Global S.A., distinct from the online HTX exchange, and that the UK designation should not impact HTX’s platform or user funds. The delisting underscores how sanction compliance and complex corporate structures can translate into rapid on-chain and trading frictions for users.

Key takeaways

  • HTX delists World Liberty Financial’s USD1 stablecoin and halts USD1-related deposits, conversions, and several trading pairs, citing a WLFI-initiated address freeze.
  • USD1 holdings on HTX will be converted 1:1 into USDT, with further timing details to be announced separately.
  • HTX accuses WLFI of freezing addresses without adequate notice, contractual basis, or due process, and says it may pursue legal remedies to protect users.
  • UK sanctions on HTX in May 2024 highlight the broader regulatory backdrop facing exchanges linked to high-profile personalities and political figures, though HTX asserts the sanctioned entity is distinct from the live exchange.
  • Public cross-lawsuits frame a tense web: Justin Sun has previously sued WLFI over token freezes, while WLFI alleged defamation in a separate filing—illustrating how reputational and legal battles intersect with stability and compliance issues.

HTX delisting: how the dispute unfolded and what changes for users

In an official post, HTX stated that WLFI’s team “unilaterally imposed a freeze on specific HTX on-chain addresses based on sanctions compliance reviews.” The consequence, according to HTX, is a restriction on the on-chain circulation of WLFI assets associated with those addresses. To protect users, HTX decided to delist USD1 and to convert existing USD1 holdings into USDT at a 1:1 ratio. The exchange emphasized that the exact timing and mechanics of the conversion would be announced separately, but the immediate effect is a pause on deposits and conversions of USD1, as well as the suspension of WLFI/USDT, USD1/USDT, BTC/USD1 and ETH/USD1 trading pairs.

HTX’s statement also criticized WLFI for acting without sufficient prior communication, adequate contractual or legal grounds, or transparent disclosure. The exchange signaled that it would explore legal avenues to safeguard user rights and assets, indicating a possible broader legal battle should WLFI stand by the freezing action. This move reflects a broader tension inside the crypto liquidity ecosystem: sanctions compliance can collide with user rights and the integrity of on-chain assets, pushing platforms to make rapid, user-visible changes to stablecoins and trading liquidity.

Regulatory backdrop: sanctions, statements, and the path forward

The UK’s sanction action against HTX in May 2024 serves as a backdrop to HTX’s decision to delist USD1. The British government cited “reasonable grounds to suspect” that HTX had supported Russia’s government through financial services. HTX has asserted that Huobi Global S.A., the entity named in the designation, is a distinct corporate entity from the online HTX exchange. The company argued that such a designation should not automatically impact its platform or its users, yet the incident adds pressure on exchanges to maintain compliance while preserving user assets and liquidity.

Advertisement

World Liberty Financial has not publicly confirmed whether it froze HTX addresses. WLFI’s public statements, however, have underscored a stance on sanctions compliance. On X, WLFI stated that “in light of recent sanctions updates, World Liberty Financial maintains risk-based sanctions compliance controls.” The project has yet to provide detailed commentary on the HTX matter, and Cointelegraph notes that it contacted WLFI for comment. The lack of immediate public disclosure from WLFI leaves a gap in understanding the full scope of the address freezes and their rationale, complicating the assessment of responsibility and due process in the process.

Beyond this specific incident, the broader dispute intersects with ongoing personal and legal frictions between Justin Sun and WLFI. Sun, a crypto entrepreneur associated with HTX and serving on the exchange’s global advisory board, has previously pursued civil action against WLFI, alleging that WLFI froze his tokens and threatened to burn them “without any proper justification.” WLFI later countered with a defamation lawsuit against Sun, alleging false statements about WLFI’s token sale practices and alleged prohibited transfers. These overlapping lawsuits highlight how reputational and contractual disputes can evolve alongside regulatory actions, potentially impacting liquidity, market perception, and user confidence in affiliated platforms.

Market impact and investor perspective: what this means for users and builders

While the immediate action centers on USD1 and related WLFI assets, the episode raises several questions for investors, traders, and developers building on or around WLFI-linked instruments. First, the incident underscores the fragility of stablecoins and on-chain assets when sanction screens intersect with exchange-level enforcement. A unilateral address freeze, followed by asset delistings, can squeeze liquidity and complicate exit possibilities for users who hold instruments pegged to WLFI or USD1. Traders who previously relied on USD1 liquidity on HTX will need to adapt to convert liquidity into USDT, potentially widening spreads between WLFI-related pairs and other stablecoins until liquidity rebalances elsewhere.

Second, the episode illustrates how jurisdictional sanctions risk translates into operational risk for exchanges. HTX’s readiness to delist and convert holdings signals a risk-management approach aimed at protecting users, but it also introduces uncertainty for users who may have been holding USD1 or WLFI assets across multiple venues. The UK sanction action against HTX, while contested in terms of its impact on the online platform, contributes to a broader environment in which exchanges must balance regulatory compliance with user rights and asset usability.

Advertisement

For builders and auditors, the situation highlights the importance of transparent governance and clear communications around sanctions-driven actions. As WLFI and HTX navigate legal actions and potential regulatory clarifications, projects issuing on-chain tokens tied to financial instruments will benefit from robust dispute-resolution mechanisms, explicit on-chain freeze procedures, and predictable paths for user redress when asset freezes occur. The absence of a standardized framework for addressing such freezes can increase confusion and erode trust during already volatile periods in the crypto market.

What comes next: unresolved questions and watchpoints

Key questions remain about how WLFI will address HTX’s allegations of improper freezing, whether WLFI will provide detailed disclosures about the affected addresses, and how the conversion process from USD1 to USDT will unfold in terms of timing, fees, and eligibility. The UK sanction action against HTX adds a layer of regulatory scrutiny that may influence how other exchanges approach similar scenarios, especially when there are concerns about the delineation between sanctioned entities and live platforms. As the legal dispute between Sun and WLFI develops, readers should monitor whether additional lawsuits emerge and how courts interpret sanctions compliance, due process, and the protection of user assets in cross-border crypto arrangements.

For now, users of HTX holding USD1 or WLFI-linked assets should stay alert to further notices from HTX regarding conversion timelines, deposit options, and new trading restrictions. As WLFI responds and regulators weigh next steps, the market will be watching closely for the emergence of any precedent that could shape how stabilizers and sanction screening interact with on-chain asset flows in the months ahead.

Sources: HTX official post on X; UK sanctions update on HTX; World Liberty Financial statements on X; prior reporting on Justin Sun’s suits against WLFI and WLFI’s defamation suit against Sun.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

XRP News: David Schwartz Just Said XRP Is Becoming a Settlement Layer for Stocks and Loans, Is the Infrastructure Actually Ready?

Published

on

xrp logo

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz used a June 5 video segment to lay out what the XRP Ledger is becoming: a settlement and issuance layer for tokenized stocks, money market funds, repos, and on-chain loans, not just a faster payments rail. This is bullish news for XRP.

The roadmap is specific, the infrastructure timeline is tight, and the institutional partner list is real. The question worth asking is which parts of this are already running and which are still in the queue.

Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

What’s Actually Live on XRPL Right Now: The RWA Base Is Real, But the Headline Products Are Still Incoming

Advertisement

The traction on XRPL’s real-world asset layer is not a projection, it’s a data point. Tokenized RWAs on the ledger grew from $24.7 million to $567.9 million over the course of 2025, a 2,200% increase, and reached approximately $2.325 billion by early 2026.

That trajectory puts XRPL roughly 8th globally for distributed tokenized RWAs, representing around 1.53% of the total market.

Source: RWA.XYZ

The top issuers are VERT Capital, RLUSD, and OpenEden, which together accounted for 85.5% of tokenized value as of mid-2025. Ripple’s regulated stablecoin RLUSD carries a $1.3 billion market cap, making it the third-largest US-regulated stablecoin.

That is the live stack. The $2.3 billion figure is real. What it means for XRPL’s ambitions in tokenized equities and credit is a different question.

On the protocol side, two mechanisms are central to Schwartz’s vision. The Multi-Purpose Token standard, MPT, allows complex structured assets like bonds and funds to be represented on-chain with built-in attributes such as maturity dates and transfer restrictions, without requiring custom smart-contract logic.

Advertisement

The native lending protocol, being rolled out under XLS-66 as part of XRPL Version 3.0.0, enables fixed-term institutional loans with isolated vaults and automated repayments. A permissioned DEX, order books accessible only to KYC-credentialed participants – already has its first live offering. These are not concepts.

They are shipping infrastructure. The XLS-66 validator vote, which requires an 80% supermajority, is the remaining gate on full lending protocol activation.

What XRP Schwartz Said on June 5 and What the News Sequencing Actually Signals

Schwartz’s framing in the ‘XRP in a Minute’ segment was deliberate in its sequencing. He opened by tracing Bitcoin’s contribution, proving that a public blockchain could let people hold and transfer value, and then positioned XRPL as the next layer: ‘providing both the native digital assets similar to bitcoin, as well as issued assets that can represent things like stablecoins or tokenized assets of any kind.’

Advertisement

He then named the near-term product categories explicitly: ‘tokenized securities to money market funds, even things like tokenized stocks.’ And on the credit side: ‘tokenized repos and tokenized loans.’ The ordering matters.

Securities and funds first, those have the clearest institutional demand and the most developed compliance infrastructure on XRPL already. Repos and loans follow, which require the XLS-66 lending protocol to be fully live.

Tokenized stocks are named but are not yet confirmed as live products on the ledger as of the article date. Archax, the UK-regulated digital securities exchange, has committed a $1 billion pipeline including equities and fund units.

The infrastructure, MPT, permissioned DEX, credential-gated order books, is capable of supporting tokenized equities. The actual live products are not yet announced.

Advertisement

Schwartz’s institutional thesis is pointed: ‘Enterprises will provide the features that will attract mass retail adoption, where DeFi can truly deliver on its promise of replacing TradFi.’

That is an argument that compliance-first, enterprise-built financial products are the on-ramp for the next wave of tokenization adoption, not permissionless protocols or retail speculation.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post XRP News: David Schwartz Just Said XRP Is Becoming a Settlement Layer for Stocks and Loans, Is the Infrastructure Actually Ready? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CME is letting traders bet on bitcoin volatility, not price, and two firms have already placed bets

Published

on

Bitcoin's price discovery is moving to Chicago

CME’s bitcoin volatility index futures began trading last week, offering investors a new way to trade and hedge price volatility. DV Chain and Monarq Asset Management executed the first block trades, kicking off trading in the contracts.

These volatility contracts track the CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index (BVX), which represents the market’s expectations for bitcoin volatility over four weeks. Their debut allows traders to take positions directly on expected price turbulence rather than just price direction.

That distinction matters because most derivatives, including futures, perpetual futures and options, require a view on where price is going. Volatility futures eliminate that complexity, letting traders express a view purely on how BTC will move in either direction.

That opens the door to a new set of hedging and portfolio strategies that were previously difficult to execute on regulated venues. Think of positioning for how much bitcoin might move around events like this week’s U.S. inflation data – traders can go long or short volatility depending on their outlook.

Advertisement

Shiliang Tang, CEO of Monarq, called the launch a positive step in broadening regulated volatility offerings.

“As bitcoin continues to mature into a more mainstream institutional asset class, the demand for sophisticated risk management instruments grows alongside it. Robust tools like CME Group Bitcoin Volatility futures are exactly what investors need to accurately express their market viewpoints and efficiently hedge their portfolios within a secure, transparent framework,” he said in the press announcement.

Monarq Asset Management is a institutional-focused quantitative and systematic digital asset investment firm managed by former executives from firms such as LedgerPrime, Tower Research, and BlockTower Capital. DV Chain is a liquidity and market-making service provider.

The launch of volatility futures expands CME’s existing product suite comprising bitcoin and ether standard and micro futures and options contracts. The platform’s crypto derivatives business has reached roughly 266,900 contracts year-to-date, up 38% year-on-year, while average daily open interest stands at roughly 274,500 contracts, up 18%.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tesla: Attempted Decline Following a Corrective Trend

Published

on

Tesla: Attempted Decline Following a Corrective Trend

The fundamental backdrop surrounding Tesla has been mixed in recent weeks. In the first quarter of 2026, the company exceeded consensus expectations, reporting adjusted EPS of $0.41 versus forecasts of $0.36, while revenue reached $22.38 billion. Gross margin in the automotive segment improved to 19.2%, and the company recorded its largest order backlog in more than two years.

At the same time, corporate developments continue to influence market sentiment. Speculation regarding a potential merger between Tesla and SpaceX has intensified following CNBC reports on 27 May that Elon Musk had discussed a combination of the two companies with colleagues. Against this backdrop, JPMorgan removed its long-standing “underweight” rating on 5 June, ending a bearish stance that had been maintained for years.

Technical Picture

On the four-hour chart, Tesla shares display a three-phase structure. From late December 2025 through early April 2026, the stock remained in a sustained downtrend. After forming a local low near 337, the price reversed higher and entered a corrective advance. The correction peaked in the 452 area before a sharp decline brought the shares back towards current levels.

The upper boundary of the profile at 443 and the 452 area could act as resistance should a bullish scenario develop. Meanwhile, the green support level near 385 remains a potential downside target for sellers.

The point of control (POC) of the horizontal volume profile is concentrated between 423 and 424, making this area — together with the lower boundary of the profile — particularly important to monitor. The profile boundaries at 417 and 443 define the current trading range, and either a breakout or a successful defence of these levels could encourage more active participation from market participants.

Advertisement

The RSI and its moving averages currently stand at 31, 47 and 51. The oscillator is approaching oversold territory, while the moving averages remain close to the neutral zone, suggesting that momentum has yet to develop a clear directional bias.

Key Takeaways

The technical outlook for Tesla shares is currently centred on price action around key support levels. Until the 385 level is decisively broken and confirmed by corresponding signals from the RSI and its moving averages, neither side appears to hold a clear advantage. Meanwhile, the corporate narrative remains focused on the potential SpaceX merger and JPMorgan’s rating revision, both of which could act as catalysts for the stock’s next medium-term move.

Buy and sell stocks of the world’s biggest publicly-listed companies with CFDs on FXOpen’s trading platform. Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading share CFDs with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SYS Drops 20% After 5B Unauthorized Tokens Minted in Syscoin Bridge Exploit

Published

on

An attacker exploited a validation flaw in Syscoin’s bridge system, minting about 5 billion SYS tokens without authorization and sending the token’s price into a nearly 20% freefall.

This incident was revealed by the Syscoin team in an early postmortem published on X, and it comes during a tough stretch for SYS, which was already deeply in the red across the last few weeks and months.

What Happened

According to Syscoin’s postmortem, the attacker exploited a validation issue in the bridge relay path, which incorrectly accepted or interpreted a transaction proof. That error caused the system to treat a fraudulent transaction as valid and create an unauthorized output of approximately 5 billion SYS, then valued at just under $10 million.

Per the Syscoin team, the stolen funds were sent to the address sys1qgaelv…9wvcw and then split across two other wallets, one holding about 4 billion SYS and the other the remaining 1 billion.

Advertisement

Syscoin immediately paused the bridge and has since contacted exchanges and ecosystem partners asking them to blacklist or freeze any deposits connected to the tainted UTXO trail and its downstream transactions. The team also said that it had identified the affected validation path and had put in place a fix pending security review and implementation.

According to blockchain analytics account Hupzy, operated by Spot On Chain, the incident was a recurring structural problem. It also noted that while blacklisting by exchanges may contain the secondary damage, the reputational hit to the bridge model will persist.

A Token Already Under Pressure

The exploit couldn’t have landed at a worse time for SYS holders, considering that when it happened, the token was already down more than 43% in seven days and over 82% in the last month.

A lot of that longer-term decline was already in motion after Binance delisted SYS last month alongside four other tokens following a review of its listing standards.

Advertisement

Shortly after the delisting news broke, the Syscoin community responded by pulling well over 300 million SYS from the exchange, with over 600 new nodes reportedly added to the network.

The attack on the Syscoin bridge is the latest in a string of cross-chain security incidents that have kept DeFi on edge. They include an $11 million exploit on the Verus network in May and the draining of $7.3 million from more than 1,400 DxSale liquidity pools on the BNB Chain.

Luckily for Verus, the hacker later returned about $8.5 million, keeping $2.8 million for themselves as a white-hat bounty.

The post SYS Drops 20% After 5B Unauthorized Tokens Minted in Syscoin Bridge Exploit appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto News, June 8: BTC USD Bouncing, Strategy Buys More Bitcoin, Hayes Denies LookOnChain Claims as ZachXBT Calls his Pn’D Scheme

Published

on

🚨

BTC USD saw sharp volatility as it dipped below $63K, rebounded to $63.7K, then dumped again after fresh Iran-Israel strikes. Not helping the case, an 8% KOSPI crash triggered a circuit breaker in South Korea as the Asian stock market tumbled. Geopolitical tensions rattled global risk assets while crypto extended last week’s pain.

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index fell to 8, an extreme fear condition, the worst sentiment since 2 months. Last week alone, crypto shed $390 billion in its worst performance since the FTX collapse, with BTC USD down 17% and ETH down 22%. BTC USD briefly tested sub-$60K levels before a weekend relief rally pushed it back to $63K.

Geopolitical tension is also pushing oil higher as safe-haven flows into the dollar. Thus, BTC/USD took a hit amid fears of Japan’s BOJ’s moves.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Strategy Hints More BTC USD Buys, Hayes Denies LookOnChain Claims, ZachXBT Cries Foul

Michael Saylor posted Strategy’s signature Bitcoin accumulation chart with the caption “a good time to add more dots,” despite their unrealized losses. The firm’s CEO, Phuong Le, backs Saylor’s remark. “Rumors otherwise are just rumors.”

Strategy continues executing its long-term plan even as public companies holding BTC as treasury assets lost $62 billion in combined market cap during the June rout.

Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

At the same time, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes denied LookOnChain reports that he rebought HYPE after a large wallet withdrawal was spotted. On-chain detective ZachXBT publicly called out Hayes for promoting then dumping HYPE, NEAR, ZEC, and WLD in quick succession, accusing him of creating exit liquidity for followers. Hayes brushed it off, saying he sells to willing buyers and shares trades openly.

The drama has fueled debates on Crypto Twitter about influencer transparency. ZachXBT also disputed separate Dubai scam claims while the timeline recapped Twitter’s drama as banks pushing onchain tokenized deposits. This happened after JPMorgan’s Dimon called Coinbase’s Armstrong full of shit.

Advertisement

Another drama comes from Justin Sun’s HTX. The exchange delisted Trump-backed stablecoin USD1 after World Liberty Financial froze exchange-linked wallets. HTX converted user holdings to USDT at 1:1 and suspended related pairs, escalating a public feud tied to prior sanctions and asset freezes.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Senate Progress on Clarity Act Keeps Hope Alive

Advertisement

Senator Cynthia Lummis declared victory after the Clarity Act passed the committee:

“The floor is next. We did not come this far to quit at the 5-yard line.”

Lawmakers now eye a full Senate vote before summer recess, though we see trimmed passage odds slashed to 60% as the clock ticks.

However, extreme fear often precedes explosive recoveries. History shows Fear & Greed readings below 10 have frequently marked local bottoms before powerful BTC USD rallies. With corporate buyers like Strategy still committed and geopolitical noise likely to fade, the current washout could send crypto higher.

BTC USD dips, rebounds, dumps again as Strategy doubles down on Bitcoin as F&G hits lowest. Hayes fights LookOnChain, ZachXBT exposes.
Fear and Greed, Alternative

On the bullish front, institutional adoption from major banks and clearer U.S. rules will drive capital back into Bitcoin and quality assets. The BTC USD dip may prove to be the final shakeout before summer strength returns. Extreme fear at 8 is not sustainable.

Follow us here for more updates today.

Advertisement

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

The post Crypto News, June 8: BTC USD Bouncing, Strategy Buys More Bitcoin, Hayes Denies LookOnChain Claims as ZachXBT Calls his Pn’D Scheme appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Zcash founder outlines two-step response to critical Orchard vulnerability

Published

on

ZEC/USDT 1-day price chart.

Josh Swihart has detailed Zcash’s emergency response to a vulnerability that could have enabled unlimited counterfeit ZEC creation, as the token has recovered more than 41% from its post-disclosure low.

Summary

  • Zcash deployed a soft fork and a hard fork to fix a critical Orchard vulnerability that could have enabled unlimited counterfeit ZEC creation.
  • Josh Swihart said mining pools and exchanges reviewed the emergency code changes, with ViaBTC and Foundry helping coordinate the response.
  • ZEC has recovered more than 41% from its June 5 low after the vulnerability was patched and Orchard transactions were restored.

According to Josh Swihart, founder of Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL), the team deployed a two-stage network upgrade after discovering a critical flaw in Zcash’s Orchard shielded pool, the network’s primary privacy-focused transaction system.

In a June 8 post on X, Swihart said the first step involved a soft fork that disabled Orchard transactions while allowing developers to reduce the risk of exploitation without publicly revealing details that could have exposed the network to further threats. 

Advertisement

A second upgrade, the NU6.2 hard fork, went live on June 3 and addressed the underlying vulnerability before Orchard transactions were restored.

The update follows last week’s disclosure from Shielded Labs, an independent support organization for Zcash, which warned that a flaw in the Orchard circuit could have allowed an attacker to mint unlimited counterfeit ZEC.

Shielded Labs said the issue had been fixed and added that it considered prior exploitation unlikely, although it acknowledged there was no cryptographic proof that the bug had never been used.

Orchard serves as Zcash’s main shielded pool, allowing users to send and receive ZEC through zero-knowledge proofs that conceal transaction details while validating transfers.

Advertisement

Mining pools and exchanges reviewed emergency fix

During the response process, Swihart said ZODL worked closely with mining pools, exchanges, and other ecosystem participants that requested code reviews before supporting the upgrade.

Among those participants, Swihart identified ViaBTC and Foundry as key contributors that helped coordinate the network response and verify the emergency changes before activation.

Earlier discussions around the vulnerability had already prompted conversations about longer-term recovery measures. Shielded Labs previously outlined a proposal known as Ironwood, which would isolate the existing Orchard pool, track coins leaving the system through turnstile accounting, and eventually guide users toward a new shielded pool with stronger supply verification mechanisms.

Advertisement

Separate comments from David Schwartz, CTO emeritus of Ripple, also addressed concerns from Zcash users about funds left behind in Orchard. 

Schwartz said passive holders would not automatically lose ownership of their coins if no exploit occurred before any migration process, explaining that consensus rules could continue recognizing those balances even if the pool stopped seeing regular activity.

ZEC rebounds after sharp selloff

Market reaction to the disclosure was immediate. According to previously reported price data, ZEC fell from roughly $630 to around $303 after news of the vulnerability emerged, as traders grappled with uncertainty surrounding the integrity of the shielded pool and the possibility that counterfeit coins may have entered circulation.

Questions about the protocol’s security reached beyond the Zcash community. Among the high-profile reactions, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes said he had exited his entire ZEC position after learning of the vulnerability.

Advertisement

Recent trading has shown signs of stabilization. According to crypto.news data cited by Swihart, ZEC rose 13.5% over the past 24 hours to $428.67, representing a recovery of about 41.5% from the June 5 low near $303.

ZEC/USDT 1-day price chart.
ZEC/USDT 1-day price chart. Source: crypto.news

Summing up the incident, Swihart said the network had resolved the vulnerability, tested its incident response procedures, strengthened relationships with ecosystem partners, and aligned developers around a recovery path for the project.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Galaxy Digital Drops Odds of CLARITY Act Passing to 60%

Published

on

Galaxy Digital Drops Odds of CLARITY Act Passing to 60%

Crypto firm Galaxy Digital has lowered the odds of the Senate passing its crypto market structure bill before the end of the year, noting that the window for lawmakers to act on the bill is closing. 

“On May 22, we raised our estimate of the probability that the CLARITY Act becomes law in 2026 to 75%, up from the 55% we published the morning of May 14’s Senate Banking markup, Galaxy’s head of research Alex Thorn said in a note on Friday. “We are now lowering that estimate to 60%.”

Thorn said the bill must pass the Senate before a month-long August recess starting in late July, as “after that, the window effectively closes.” He added that major legislation has historically not moved in the lead-up to the midterm elections due to lawmakers campaigning.

Many Senate lawmakers have been pushing for the chamber to pass the bill after the House passed its version, called the CLARITY Act, last year.

Advertisement

The Senate Agriculture and Banking Committees have passed versions of the bill, and it now needs at least 60 votes on the Senate floor to pass without prolonged debate.

“For a 60-vote bill that still needs floor debate, an amendment process, reconciliation with the Senate Agriculture text, and then House action on the changes, Majority Leader [John] Thune realistically needs to schedule floor time at some point in July,” Thorn said.

“Anything later and the procedural steps do not fit before the recess,” he added.

Source: Alex Thorn

Advertisement

Thorn said another reason Galaxy lowered its odds is that no information shows that the bill, or negotiations around it, have advanced, and provisions around ethics and illicit finance are a sticking point that have not yet been resolved.

He added that Galaxy would revise its odds if Senate leaders committed to passing the bill next month and that provisions to get lawmakers on side are finalized.

Galaxy’s latest odds came after analysts at JPMorgan on Wednesday said they see less than a 50% chance that the CLARITY Act passes this year, similarly citing a tightening congressional calendar ahead of the elections.

Meanwhile, Bitwise investment chief Matt Hougan said on Tuesday that his view of the bill passing this year is “less optimistic,” and that “D.C. insiders” he spoke with put the odds of its passage between 5% and 30%.

Advertisement

Senator Cynthia Lummis, the chair of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets, has escalated her calls for the Senate to pass the bill, having made at least 15 posts on X about the legislation so far in June.

“The Clarity Act passed committee. The floor is next. We did not come this far to quit at the 5 yard line,” she posted on Sunday.

Lummis told CNBC on Wednesday that lawmakers working on the bill are addressing issues, including around ethics and illicit finance, that could see it lose support on a floor vote.

Magazine: Will the CLARITY Act be good — or bad — for DeFi?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Whales Buy the Dip as Ethereum Exchange Reserves Keep Falling

Published

on

Ethereum (ETH) Price Performance

Large Ethereum (ETH) holders bought heavily after the latest crash, with one early investor rebuying more ETH and Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) than they sold earlier.

Exchange reserves also fell sharply, a sign that holders moved coins away from trading platforms.

Ethereum Whales Accumulate ETH Near $1,600

Ethereum fell sharply last week alongside the broader market. The altcoin dropped by more than 16.8% over the past 7 days and even slid below $1,600 on Friday. 

Macro pressure drove the move. Renewed Middle East tensions and a cautious Federal Reserve weighed on risk assets. Steady outflows from spot exchange-traded funds added to the strain. 

Advertisement

On Monday, the second-largest cryptocurrency saw modest gains of over 3%. At press time, it traded at $1,664.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Ethereum (ETH) Price Performance
Ethereum (ETH) Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto Markets

Still, the backdrop turned the dip into an entry point for some of the market’s largest wallets.

Whales Buy as Reserves Decline

Blockchain tracker, Lookonchain, flagged a standout move. An Ethereum OG sold 60,000 ETH near $2,040 before the drop. The whale also sold 600 WBTC at $78,538 and 9,442 wrapped staked ETH (wstETH).

After the crash, the same wallets bought back more than they sold. They repurchased 60,088 ETH and 10,000 wstETH at $1,606. They also added 611 WBTC at $63,280. Lookonchain called it a clean example of selling high and buying low.

Advertisement

Other buyers followed near the lows. A wallet reportedly linked to Chun Wang withdrew 17,560 ETH worth $28.67 million from Binance. 

Cohort data from Santiment shows the buying was uneven. Wallets holding 1 million to 10 million ETH lifted their balance to about 6.89 million ETH, adding roughly 290,000 ETH in the first week of June.

Mid-sized wallets moved the other way. Addresses holding 10,000 to 100,000 ETH cut their stack to about 26.87 million ETH, extending the slide.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, exchange reserves told a similar story. Tracked ETH on Binance, OKX, Gemini, and Bitfinex fell by about 475,000 ETH in early June. Binance alone shed roughly 190,000 ETH between June 4 and June 7.

“A reserve decline across several major exchanges can point to tighter available ETH liquidity on centralized platforms, especially if it continues while spot demand improves,” analyst Amr Taha wrote.

Whether the accumulation holds will depend on demand over the coming days.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Whales Buy the Dip as Ethereum Exchange Reserves Keep Falling appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Miners Flash Rare Signal After Price Crashed Below $60,000

Published

on

Bitcoin Miner Net Position Change

Bitcoin (BTC) price rebounded about 1.6% over 24 hours to near $63,100, yet the move that matters sits beneath.

After six weeks of selling, Bitcoin miners have flipped to net accumulation just as price carved a cycle low, an on-chain shift that echoes the last major turn. Exclusive BeInCrypto data threads three signals into one picture.

Bitcoin Miners Flip to Accumulation After Six Weeks of Selling

Since June 5, Bitcoin miners have posted three consecutive days of positive net position change, a metric that tracks whether miners add to or draw down their holdings.

The shift breaks a stretch of red that ran from April 23 through June 4, one of the longer miner capitulation phases of the year.

Advertisement

The timing stands out. The flip to green arrives just after the price breached its sub-$60,000 low, the same pattern seen at the previous turn.

A local bottom near $64,088 in late February closed the prior capitulation, after which miner flows turned positive in early March and coincided with the Bitcoin price recovery.

Bitcoin Miner Net Position Change
Bitcoin Miner Net Position Change: Glassnode

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Miners hold structural insight into network economics, so a move back to accumulation after heavy selling is worth watching. Whether it repeats the March sequence depends on what the next signal shows about network demand.

Network Revenue Hit Its 2026 High as Miners Turned

The accumulation shift lines up with a quiet recovery in network demand, per BeInCrypto’s exclusive Dune dashboard. Bitcoin network revenue, the total transaction fees miners earn, climbed to 89 BTC in May, the strongest monthly reading of 2026.

Advertisement

That figure tops February’s 80 BTC, March’s 79, and April’s 74, marking a clear pickup in fee income just as miners stopped selling. Stronger fee revenue eases the operational pressure that forces miners to liquidate, which helps explain why their net position turned.

Bitcoin Network Revenue
Bitcoin Network Revenue: Dune

June’s reading sits at 26 BTC. Yet, that figure covers only the first eight days and remains incomplete, so it cannot be read as a drop.

Yet, the BTC trend still looks positive, which explains why the miners’ net position change has turned up.

Note: When network revenue rises, miners earn more from fees, so they feel less need to sell their Bitcoin to cover costs, which is why their net position can flip from selling to accumulating.

The relevant point is the May surge, the best fee month since the start of the year, landing alongside the miner flip. Two signals now point the same way. The third tests whether leverage could undo them.

Advertisement

Open Interest Stays Low, Easing the Long-Flush Risk

The final signal sits in derivatives, where the setup looks calmer than it did before last week’s crash. Total open interest dropped from about $31.26 billion in late May to near $22.31 billion, after touching $21.09 billion.

That matters because the current funding rate of 0.005%, which reflects what traders pay to hold long positions, sits just below the 0.006% reading from early June that preceded the price crash.

The difference is open interest. Leverage stood far higher on June 1, so the same lean toward longs carries less risk of a cascading long flush now.

That leverage cooling coincides with the Bitcoin miner pickup.

Advertisement
Bitcoin Open Interest and Funding: Santiment

However, there are some warning signs. Funding turning positive again shows buyers leaning long, and sellers have reappeared as new whales realize losses.

For now, watch whether miner accumulation holds, whether fee revenue builds in June, and whether open interest stays contained. Those three, not price alone, will show if the on-chain turn has staying power.

The post Bitcoin Miners Flash Rare Signal After Price Crashed Below $60,000 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Can the recovery reach $64K?

Published

on

Bitcoin (BTC) price chart, source: crypto.news

Bitcoin price recovered above $62,000 on Monday after last week’s selloff pushed the asset to about $59,100. 

Summary

  • Bitcoin reclaimed its 200-week average after sweeping February’s low, but resistance remains near $64,000.
  • Oversold RSI supports a relief bounce, while bearish MACD shows sellers still control broader momentum.
  • Rising open interest increases liquidation risk as traders watch $55,000 if the recovery loses support.

The rebound briefly carried BTC near $64,200 before sellers returned, leaving the market between long-term support and its first recovery barrier.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin traded near $63,000, up 1.39% over 24 hours. Its daily range stood between $61,206 and $63,739, while the seven-day loss remained 14.06%. Buyers have slowed the decline, but they have not reversed the broader weekly trend. ETF flows and futures positioning also remain important tests for the rebound.

Advertisement

Bitcoin price holds the 200-week moving average

Bitcoin closed the week above its 200-week simple moving average near $62,800 after sweeping the February low, according to crypto analyst Crypto Rover. Traders follow this average because it tracks Bitcoin’s long-term trend. 

Holding above it could support another test of $64,000 to $64,200. A daily close below the average would return attention to $60,000 and the recent $59,100 low.

The June decline followed several waves of macro pressure. Higher inflation weakened expectations for easier monetary policy in May. Strong U.S. employment data then added another setback. 

Advertisement

The economy created 172,000 jobs in May, compared with forecasts of 85,000, while unemployment stayed at 4.3%. As previously reported by crypto.news, Bitcoin’s break below $60,000 came as total crypto liquidations passed $1.7 billion within 24 hours.

Oversold RSI meets a still-bearish MACD setup

Bitcoin’s 14-day relative strength index stands at 26.43, below the 30 oversold threshold and its RSI moving average of 28.60. The reading shows that selling became stretched, which can support a relief bounce without confirming a lasting bottom. According to analyst Crypto Rover, the Fear and Greed Index has also fallen to 8, placing sentiment in “extreme fear.”

The Wolf of All Streets trader Scott Melker said Bitcoin may be forming a weekly bullish divergence from oversold RSI. “Need this week to close with a clear elbow up on price and RSI,” he wrote. The signal remains unconfirmed because price and momentum must turn higher together. 

Bitcoin’s MACD line sits near -4,019.58, below the signal line at -2,951.83, while the histogram remains negative at -1,067.75. Rising selling volume supports the bearish momentum reading and shows that sellers remain active despite the rebound.

Advertisement
Bitcoin (BTC) price chart, source: crypto.news
Bitcoin (BTC) price chart, source: crypto.news

Trump-Iran headlines keep Bitcoin traders cautious

Bitcoin’s move toward $64,000 followed comments from U.S. President Donald Trump about a possible agreement with Iran. Trump said the parties were “very close” to a deal and claimed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not control the process, according to Reuters. Traders initially treated the remarks as a possible reduction in geopolitical risk, helping stocks and cryptocurrencies recover from their late-week lows.

Events on June 8 weakened that optimism. Israel struck military targets and a petrochemical site in Iran after Tehran fired missiles toward Israel. Trump maintained that the attacks would not derail talks, but the renewed exchange left the agreement uncertain. 

Brent oil rose above $96 per barrel as prices gained more than 3%. Higher energy costs could keep inflation and interest-rate concerns active for Bitcoin. The market may therefore remain sensitive to each new military or diplomatic update.

Bitcoin support levels place $55,000 next in focus

Analyst Ali Martinez listed the 200-week average at $62,800, the 300-week average at $55,000 and the 400-week average near $42,500. These levels form a long-term support ladder rather than fixed targets. 

Bitcoin must first defend $62,800 and $60,000 before the lower averages become active tests. The $55,000 area also matches a long-running trendline tracked by Crypto Patel, making it the next broad support zone if the recent low fails.

Calls for $42,500 or $35,000 remain conditional bearish cases rather than immediate forecasts. Bitcoin would need to lose the 200-week average, the $60,000 level, the $59,100 low and the $55,000 region before those levels gain weight. That sequence gives traders several areas to assess before treating a deeper fall as the main path.

Derivatives data adds another risk. Crypto.news reported that open interest rose while Bitcoin’s price fell, showing that traders added leverage during weakness. That setup can produce a short squeeze if BTC clears $64,200, or another long squeeze if the price falls below $60,000. A firm close above $64,200 would strengthen the recovery and support the bullish RSI case.

Advertisement

For now, $62,800 remains the main dividing line. Holding it would keep $64,200 within reach and give buyers time to build a base. Failure to hold the 200-week average would place $60,000, $59,100 and $55,000 back in focus, while the bearish MACD would remain the stronger trend signal.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025