Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Hyperliquid price stalls at $32, low volume signals weakness

Published

on

Hyperliquid price stalls at $32 resistance as declining volume signals weakness - 1

Hyperliquid price has rallied into a major resistance cluster near $32 but shows signs of exhaustion as volume declines. Failure to reclaim this zone increases the probability of a corrective move toward lower support.

Summary

  • Rejection at $32–$35 resistance confluence zone
  • Declining volume suggests corrective rally
  • $21 value area low becomes next downside target

Hyperliquid’s (HYPE) recent recovery attempt has brought price back into a critical technical region that previously acted as support but has now flipped into resistance. While the rally initially suggested momentum recovery, weakening volume and structural rejection signals indicate that the move may lack sustainability.

The market now sits at a decisive level where continuation requires a structural shift, otherwise downside rotation remains the higher-probability outcome.

Advertisement

Hyperliquid price key technical points

  • Key Resistance: $32–$35 zone aligns with 0.618 Fibonacci and VWAP resistance.
  • Market Structure: Former support has flipped into high timeframe resistance.
  • Downside Risk: Exposed value area low increases probability of move toward $21.
Hyperliquid price stalls at $32 resistance as declining volume signals weakness - 1
HYPEUSDT (1D) Chart, Source: TradingView

Hyperliquid has returned to a major technical inflection point around $32, an area that previously served as support before breaking down. In market structure analysis, former support zones frequently transform into resistance once lost, and the current price reaction confirms this behavior. The rejection occurring at this level suggests that sellers continue to defend higher prices aggressively.

The resistance zone extends between $32 and $35, where multiple technical indicators converge. The 0.618 Fibonacci retracement, combined with an overhead VWAP resistance, creates a strong confluence region. Such clusters often represent decision zones where markets either transition into trend reversals or resume the prevailing direction. For Hyperliquid, price has yet to demonstrate sufficient strength to invalidate the bearish structure.

A notable concern accompanying the rally is the decline in trading volume. Healthy bullish continuation typically requires expanding participation as price approaches resistance. Instead, diminishing volume indicates weakening demand, suggesting that the rally may be corrective rather than impulsive.

This type of behavior frequently precedes rejection scenarios where markets rotate back toward lower liquidity zones, even as Hyperliquid launches a Washington-based advocacy group to push for clearer congressional rules around decentralized finance.

Advertisement

From a volume profile perspective, price tends to rotate between the Value Area High (VAH), Point of Control (POC), and Value Area Low (VAL). In the current structure, the value area low remains technically untested following the recent move higher. When one side of the range remains exposed, markets often seek balance by revisiting that region. This dynamic increases the probability that Hyperliquid reverses near resistance and rotates back toward lower support.

The next major support level sits near $21, representing the value area low and a key demand zone. A move toward this region would complete a full rotational cycle within the broader range structure. While such a decline may appear bearish in the short term, it would remain consistent with range dynamics rather than signaling immediate long-term collapse.

Market structure analysis reinforces the corrective outlook. Hyperliquid continues to trade below high timeframe resistance without establishing higher highs. Until price can reclaim the $32–$35 zone on a closing basis, bullish continuation remains unlikely.

Advertisement

Instead, the prevailing structure favors rejection and gradual downside rotation, even as traders increasingly view assets like BCH, XMR, HYPE, and BlockDAG as leading crypto opportunities driven by utility and momentum.

Additionally, the failure to break resistance after multiple attempts can weaken buyer confidence. Traders often interpret repeated rejections as confirmation of supply dominance, encouraging defensive positioning and short-term selling pressure. Without a decisive reclaim supported by strong volume expansion, upside attempts are likely to fade.

What to expect in the coming price action

Hyperliquid’s short-term outlook remains vulnerable while price trades below the $32–$35 resistance cluster. Continued weakness and declining volume increase the probability of a reversal toward $21 support. Only a confirmed breakout above resistance would invalidate the bearish scenario and shift momentum back toward bullish continuation.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Aave’s TVL Falls $8B After $293M Kelp DAO Hack

Published

on

Aave’s TVL Falls $8B After $293M Kelp DAO Hack

Total value locked on decentralized lending protocol Aave dropped by nearly $8 billion over the weekend after hackers behind the $293 million Kelp DAO exploit borrowed funds on Aave, leaving roughly $195 million in “bad debt” on the protocol and triggering withdrawals.

Data from DeFiLlama shows that Aave’s TVL fell from about $26.4 billion to $18.6 billion by Sunday, losing the top spot as the largest DeFi protocol. 

Aave v3’s lending pools for USDt (USDT) and USDC (USDC) are now at 100% utilization, meaning that more than $5.1 billion worth of stablecoins cannot be withdrawn until new liquidity arrives or borrows are repaid. 

$2,540 is available to be withdrawn from the $2.87 billion USDT pool on Aave v3 at the time of writing. Source: Aave

Aave’s TVL fall shows how rapidly risk from a single security incident can spread throughout the broader, interconnected DeFi lending market, potentially leading to a severe liquidity crisis.

The incident began on Saturday when hackers stole 116,500 Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (rsETH) tokens worth about $293 million from Kelp DAO’s LayerZero-powered bridge and used them as collateral on Aave v3 to borrow wrapped Ether (wETH).

Advertisement

Crypto analytics platform Lookonchain said the move created about $195 million in “bad debt” on Aave, which contributed to the Aave (AAVE) token tanking nearly 20% from $112 on Saturday at 6:00 pm UTC to $89.5 about 25 hours later. 

Lookonchain noted that some of the largest crypto whales to withdraw funds from Aave were the MEXC crypto exchange and Abraxas Capital at $431 million and $392 million, respectively.

Source: Grvt

Several crypto networks and protocols tied to rsETH or the LayerZero bridge have paused use of the bridge until the problem is resolved, including DeFi platform Curve Finance, stablecoin issuer Ethena and BitGo’s Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC).

Aave has frozen several rsETH, wETH markets

Shortly after the Kelp DAO exploit, Aave said it froze the rsETH markets on both Aave v3 and v4 to prevent any suspicious borrowing and later stated that rsETH on Ethereum mainnet remains fully backed by underlying assets.

WETH reserves also remain frozen on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle and Linea, Aave said.

Advertisement

This incident marks the first significant stress test of Aave’s “Umbrella” security model, which was introduced in June 2025 to provide automated protection against protocol bad debt while enabling users to earn rewards.

Related: Aave DAO backs V4 mainnet plan in near-unanimous vote

Earlier this month, the Bank of Canada found that Aave avoided bad debt in its v3 market by using overcollateralization, automated liquidations and other strategies that shifted risk to borrowers.

In comments to Cointelegraph, Aave defended its liquidation-based model, framing it as a core safety mechanism that protects lenders while limiting downside for borrowers.

Advertisement

It comes as Aave parted ways with its longest-standing DeFi risk service provider, Chaos Labs, on April 6, following disagreements over the direction of Aave v4 and budget constraints.

Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?