Connect with us

Crypto World

Israel’s biggest bank launches Galaxy crypto trading for BTC, ETH, SOL

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Israel’s Bank Leumi is partnering with Galaxy Digital to bring crypto trading to its banking app, expanding digital asset access beyond institutions and into mainstream retail finance. The service is expected to launch in early 2027, allowing customers to buy, hold, and sell Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana directly through Leumi’s trading interface.

Leumi said customers of the bank and its Pepper mobile banking arm will be able to use a dedicated section within the Leumi Trade app for the three cryptocurrencies. The companies also framed the rollout as a first for an Israeli bank, while detailing how Galaxy will provide both trading capabilities and custody support.

Key takeaways

  • Leumi and Galaxy Digital plan to offer crypto trading for Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana through the Leumi Trade app.
  • Launch timing: early 2027, according to the companies’ announcement.
  • GalaxyOne Institutional will be used for trading and related services, with Galaxy custody infrastructure supporting the setup.
  • Leumi says it will be the first Israeli bank to provide digital asset trading to retail customers.

Leumi brings crypto trading into its retail app

Under the agreement announced Friday, Leumi will enable customers to access crypto markets for three major assets—Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), and Solana (SOL)—via a dedicated section of the Leumi Trade application. The functionality is designed around three common user actions: buying, holding, and selling.

Leumi positioned the integration as an industry milestone in Israel, stating that it expects to be the first Israeli bank to offer digital-asset trading services to customers. The bank also emphasized its customer footprint, noting that it serves millions of clients across retail and business operations.

For market participants, the development is notable because it suggests regulated banks are continuing to build distribution channels for crypto rather than limiting participation to broker-dealers or crypto-native platforms. While the exact user experience and onboarding steps were not detailed in the announcement, the “through the bank’s app” approach is a meaningful shift in where retail crypto services are likely to be discovered and accessed.

Advertisement

Galaxy provides trading and custody infrastructure

The partnership is supported by two separate pillars of Galaxy’s platform. Leumi said it will use GalaxyOne Institutional for trading and related services. For custody and digital asset infrastructure, the companies said Galaxy’s custody platform—formerly known as GK8—will support the technical foundation behind the offering.

That separation matters from a risk and operations standpoint. Trading systems and custody systems typically require different controls, reporting, and security tooling, and the announcement indicates Leumi will be leveraging Galaxy’s established infrastructure rather than building a complete stack internally. For investors and users watching the space, this approach is often associated with faster deployment timelines and more consistent institutional-grade operational standards.

However, until closer to launch, key details remain unclear—such as whether the service will operate with specific regional restrictions, what user limits or compliance requirements will apply, and how the platform will handle order routing and settlement. Those elements could influence both customer demand and operational risk management when the service goes live.

Why the timing and partnership structure matter

The stated target—early 2027—places the Leumi rollout well into the future, giving the banks time to complete integration, compliance procedures, and security hardening. From an editorial perspective, the duration is also a reminder that bank-led crypto products are often slower-moving than crypto-native services, particularly when custody, reporting, and regulatory frameworks must be aligned.

Advertisement

Galaxy Digital’s role as the technology and liquidity partner also highlights how large crypto firms are increasingly positioning themselves as infrastructure providers to traditional finance. Rather than building standalone consumer exchanges, these collaborations aim to turn crypto market access into a feature inside existing banking channels.

That shift could be important for adoption. Bank apps typically come with established customer onboarding, payment rails, and support workflows. If Leumi’s offering proves smooth and reliable, it could reduce friction for mainstream users who want exposure to major cryptocurrencies but prefer the familiar interface of a regulated bank.

Galaxy’s recent performance underscores a volatile backdrop

The announcement arrives after Galaxy reported a challenging period for its broader business. According to Cointelegraph’s earlier coverage linked in the original report, Galaxy posted an $85 million net loss in Q2, which it attributed largely to declining digital asset prices. Despite the net loss, Galaxy’s digital assets segment generated $66 million in adjusted gross profit, reported as up 34% quarter-over-quarter.

This matters because it frames the partnership against a backdrop where the crypto market’s direction can swing profitability. Even so, the fact that Galaxy continued to report positive adjusted gross profit in the digital assets business suggests that trading and infrastructure services may remain comparatively resilient during down cycles—especially if counterparties and institutional users continue to operate.

Advertisement

For readers tracking Galaxy’s broader strategy, the Leumi deal reinforces an angle that the company has been pursuing for some time: using institutional infrastructure and market services to gain access to distribution partners. Galaxy Digital, founded and led by Mike Novogratz, began trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker GLXY in May 2025. Yahoo Finance data showed the stock at $21.38 on Friday morning, up about 2% on the day but down roughly 25% over the past year.

What to watch next

With an early-2027 launch horizon, the most important developments for customers and the market will be regulatory approvals, product design details inside Leumi Trade, and how Galaxy’s trading and custody components are integrated for a bank-grade user experience. Until then, investors should watch for additional partner announcements and any operational disclosures that clarify how Leumi plans to scale crypto access while managing custody, compliance, and liquidity requirements.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

It’s Not Just Baltimore: Kalshi and Polymarket Face More Legal Trouble

Published

on

Baltimore has taken legal action against prediction market operators Kalshi and Polymarket, accusing both companies of offering illegal sports betting in the city.

Mayor Brandon M. Scott and the Baltimore City Council filed separate lawsuits on August 13 in the Circuit Court. The cases allege violations of Baltimore’s Consumer Protection Ordinance and accuse the companies of misleading consumers about whether their products are legal and properly regulated.

Illegal Sports Betting

The complaints claimed that Kalshi and Polymarket allow Baltimore residents to bet on game winners, point spreads, point totals, player statistics, and other outcomes commonly offered by licensed sportsbooks. The companies describe these products as “event contracts” or prediction-market trades. According to the officials, the label does not change what the products are.

Neither platform, according to the lawsuits, has the licenses required to offer sports betting in Maryland. The city said that this lets them compete with regulated sportsbooks while avoiding the oversight, taxation, responsible-gambling requirements, and consumer protections imposed on licensed operators.

Advertisement

Questions have also been raised about how the companies promote their platforms. Baltimore alleged that Kalshi and Polymarket market their platforms in ways that can create a false or misleading impression that the offerings are legal and properly regulated. The city added that this can make gambling more accessible and expose vulnerable consumers, including young adults and people with gambling addictions, to financial harm.

Baltimore is seeking civil penalties, injunctive relief, restitution for affected consumers, disgorgement of alleged ill-gotten profits, and other relief allowed under law.

Legal Battles on Multiple Fronts

The two companies are already dealing with several other legal and regulatory disputes. For example, Kalshi recently faced a lawsuit from New York State Attorney General Letitia James seeking to shut down its operations in the state. The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission then used its emergency authority to require Kalshi to continue operating in New York after the company sought federal help. The agency said the order followed the platform’s request for assistance after the state lawsuit was filed at the end of July.

It also faced a lawsuit from flight-tracking company FlightAware over flight-related prediction markets. FlightAware accused Kalshi of using its data and name without permission to host markets on flight cancellations. But the case was withdrawn just a day later. Its lawyers said the lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice against all defendants.

Advertisement

Polymarket has faced separate problems as well. JPMorgan Chase stopped providing banking services to it late last year. Polymarket has since moved to another lender, although its name has not been disclosed.

A separate consumer protection lawsuit has also been filed against it in Washington, D.C. The National Association of Consumer Advocates alleges that the company, CEO Shayne Coplan, and Chief Marketing Officer Matthew Modabber ran “flagrantly deceptive” social media advertising campaigns that promoted Polymarket to American consumers and encouraged betting on a platform that was not technically available in the US.

The complaint also refers to reports of political influencers praising Polymarket’s accuracy without disclosing paid deals. It cites a Wall Street Journal investigation that found viral videos using simulated versions of the platform to suggest creators had won bets.

The post It’s Not Just Baltimore: Kalshi and Polymarket Face More Legal Trouble appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

What to Know About the Growing Concerns Over Conditions on the Long-Deployed USS Abraham Lincoln

Published

on

What to Know About the Growing Concerns Over Conditions on the Long-Deployed USS Abraham Lincoln

In a letter to Hegseth and Cao, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, noted that the vessel’s crew members have not been to a port in a record-setting 200-plus days and demanded answers to a series of questions about the crew and the state of the ship.

“There have been widespread reports of shortages of basic supplies, water contamination, plumbing issues, deteriorating mental health, deck safety concerns, and disruptions in the mail system,” Blumenthal wrote. “These reports warrant immediate attention, but they also raise a broader question: whether the Navy can sustain the operational tempo now being demanded of its carrier force, particularly as this Administration repeatedly commits U.S. forces to conflicts of its own choosing and increasingly relies on aircraft carriers to sustain those operations.”

He also noted that the long deployment of the Lincoln is not an isolated incident, “suggesting that extended deployments may be becoming a feature rather than an exception of the Navy’s force-generation model.” The USS Gerald R. Ford, used for the U.S.’s military operation in Venezuela, spent 326 days at sea before its return in May, Blumenthal wrote, which he noted was “nearly twice the length of a traditional six-month carrier deployment and the longest modern U.S. carrier deployment since the Vietnam era.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Binance to Restrict Transactions Involving HTX, 10 Other Crypto Platforms

Published

on

Binance to Restrict Transactions Involving HTX, 10 Other Crypto Platforms

Cointelegraph is committed to providing independent, high-quality journalism across the crypto, blockchain, AI, and fintech industries.

All news, reviews, and analyses are produced with full journalistic independence and integrity. For more details on our standards and processes, please read our Editorial Policy.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

JPMorgan Boosts Bitcoin, Ether ETF Positions in Q2

Published

on

JPMorgan Boosts Bitcoin, Ether ETF Positions in Q2

JPMorgan’s reported position in BlackRock’s Bitcoin exchange-traded fund increased by about 25% in the second quarter, while its Ether ETF position more than quadrupled, according to its latest securities filing.

The Form 13F filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, submitted Wednesday, covers holdings as of June 30 and includes 17 other investment managers across JPMorgan.

That makes it difficult to determine whether individual positions reflect a directional market view, Jonatan Randin, senior market analyst at PrimeXBT, told Cointelegraph.

“It gives you some idea of what they are doing but not their opinion about the future direction of a specific market,” Randin said.

Advertisement

JPMorgan reports larger Bitcoin, Ether ETF positions

The filing showed about 10.4 million shares in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) in Q2, up from 8.3 million shares in Q1 with a reported value of roughly $356 million.

Its position in the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) rose more sharply, climbing more than fourfold to about 1.17 million shares from roughly 267,000.

Randin said a 13F can combine holdings from different parts of an institution, including positions related to client activity and inventory, making it difficult to determine the purpose behind individual holdings. Form 13F filings also exclude short positions, meaning JPMorgan’s reported long holdings do not show its net exposure.

XRP appears in JPMorgan’s holdings

Beyond Bitcoin and Ether, Randin pointed to small positions reported in XRP investment products.

Advertisement

JPMorgan reported 181 shares of Grayscale’s XRP product worth $3,763 and 113 shares of Bitwise’s XRP ETF worth $1,356 in Q2, after reporting no positions in either product in Q1.

Randin linked the timing to regulatory developments around XRP and the emergence of spot XRP investment products in the US.

“From my point of view this adds credibility to the regulatory improvements surrounding XRP,” he said.

Related: Crypto whales accumulate as bear market nears late stage: CryptoQuant

Advertisement

Additionally, JPMorgan cut positions in several Bitcoin miners, which Randin said have become less straightforward proxies for Bitcoin as some expand into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing.

“If that was the reason for holding them, trimming that part of the portfolio makes a lot of sense regardless of your view of the future direction of price,” he said.

Magazine: Sorry everyone, Bitcoin is headed down to $43,500: Michael Terpin

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Prediction markets scrutiny mounts from regulators and banks

Published

on

Prediction market pushback grows
Prediction market pushback grows

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is conducting an internal review into “mention markets” on prediction platforms, people familiar with the situation told CNBC Friday. 

Mention markets are made up of contracts where traders speculate on whether specific words will be used in a speech, a corporate earnings call with analysts and investors or a television broadcast.

One of the people familiar with the matter said the CFTC first alerted platform Kalshi of the review several weeks ago. The platform removed sports-related mention markets around the same time the CFTC — the federal regulator for prediction markets — alerted the company, the person said. NPR first reported an inquiry into mention markets late Thursday.

It’s unclear if the inquiry only applies to sports-related mention markets, or all of them regardless of topic.

Advertisement

Kalshi and the CFTC declined to comment.

Most scrutinized

Mention markets are some of prediction markets’ most scrutinized offerings. Critics view them as easily manipulable by one individual, and some platforms don’t offer them. Mention markets saw about $3.3 million in trading volume on Kalshi last month, according to Dune Analytics, far behind larger markets such as those devoted to cryptocurrencies.

In July, the CFTC said it was investigating a former teleprompter operator for President Donald Trump who allegedly made $90,000 in profits on Kalshi betting on the content of Trump’s speeches.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong last December rattled off a series of random words at the end of an earnings call to demonstrate how easily prediction market wagers can be manipulated. “I just want to add here the words bitcoin, ethereum, blockchain, staking and Web3 to make sure we get those in before the end of the call,” he said.

Advertisement

Proponents of mention markets argue words by powerful individuals have the power to move billions of dollars of money across traditional markets, making it useful to have attach predictive power to them.

“The suggestion that Mentions Markets create ‘new’ manipulation incentives is, on close inspection, overstated,” Kalshi head of market operations Arjun Sawai wrote in a letter to the CFTC as part of a public comment period last month. “They merely add a marginal, regulated, transparent, position-limited, surveilled increment to a vastly larger existing incentive structure.”

Platform Polymarket does not have mention markets on its CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange, but offers them overseas.

Meeting next week

The probe into prediction market contracts comes ahead of a meeting of the CFTC’s Innovation Advisory Committee on Aug. 20. The committee will discuss prediction markets, as well as artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, according to a public agenda.

Advertisement

The latest investigation also comes after the CFTC increased scrutiny of prediction market platforms in recent weeks, even as it supports the event contract exchanges in a battle with states over sports-related wagers and gambling. The commission has sued nine states to defend what it sees as its exclusive jurisdiction to regulate event contracts. 

Last month, the CFTC invited public comments on vertical integration among regulated entities, warning platforms to avoid sending broadly-worded, self-certified event contracts. The agency also sent letters to the platforms last week, reminding them not to present their odds in a casino-style format.

A Washington state judge on Thursday issued an order blocking several of Kalshi’s markets from operating there, including mention markets, sports, elections and other high volume categories. Kalshi is likely violating state law by operating as an illegal gambling operation, according to the order

Washington becomes the fourth state blocking Kalshi, joining Michigan, Nevada and Massachusetts. A federal judge in Minnesota last month overturned a potential statewide ban on prediction market platforms.

Advertisement

The Financial Times reported Friday that Polymarket was cut off from financial services by JPMorgan last October over concerns about government regulation. A Polymarket spokesperson told CNBC it’s still maintaining a relationship with the largest U.S. bank.

“We maintain a close, active relationship with JPMorgan across multiple entities, operational integrations, and material handling customer fund flows; the strength of our relationship is highlighted by our CEO speaking at three of their flagship events in the past year alone,” a Polymarket spokesperson said in a statement. “Any suggestion otherwise fundamentally mischaracterizes our relationship.”

Disclosure: CNBC and Kalshi have a commercial relationship that includes customer acquisition and a minority investment.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

BlackRock’s Spot Bitcoin ETF Holdings Jump 23% in Q2, Data Shows

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Morgan Stanley increased its reported cryptocurrency-related positions in the second quarter, according to its Q2 13F filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The most notable change was a significant step-up in holdings of BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF, alongside broader adjustments across other crypto-linked equities and exchange-traded funds.

Specifically, Morgan Stanley’s reported exposure to the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) rose to roughly 16.5 million shares from 13.4 million, an increase of about 23%, as reflected in the SEC filing submitted on Thursday. The firm also reported 2.57 million shares of its own Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT), which began trading in April.

Key takeaways

  • Morgan Stanley boosted its IBIT share count by more than 3 million shares in Q2, even as the reported dollar value declined due to weaker Bitcoin prices during the quarter.
  • Its MSBT position was initiated in the period, adding a new channel for the firm’s own spot Bitcoin product exposure.
  • Ether exposure expanded as well, with major increases in iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) and Grayscale’s Ethereum staking-focused mini fund.
  • The filing shows uneven positioning across the broader crypto equity complex, with gains in some miners and Circle (USDC issuer) contrasted by cuts in others.
  • Morgan Stanley’s Circle (CRCL) holdings rose sharply, while reported holdings in Coinbase and some mining names declined.

IBIT adds volume, valuation drops with Bitcoin

While Morgan Stanley added approximately 3.04 million shares to its IBIT position, the value of that stake fell by about 18% to $549 million from $667 million. The filing’s figures reflect a common dynamic for large investors: even when share counts rise, reported portfolio value can still decline if the underlying asset—here, Bitcoin—trades lower over the reporting window.

The SEC filing indicates the increase in IBIT shares occurred alongside also adding to several other Bitcoin ETF exposures. Morgan Stanley reported higher allocations to products including Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF and Bitwise’s Bitcoin ETF, while its Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) position rose by nearly 38%.

Beyond the headline IBIT change, the broader pattern suggests Morgan Stanley was concentrating more into established spot Bitcoin vehicles rather than trimming exposure at the start of Q2. Investors often watch this kind of behavior for clues on whether institutional demand is strengthening at the ETF level, particularly when the share count rises faster than the reported valuation.

Advertisement

Ether positions expand across spot and staking-linked products

Morgan Stanley’s Q2 filing also showed substantial growth in reported Ether-related ETF holdings. Its iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) position increased by about 202% to around 4.6 million shares. Morgan Stanley also raised its Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) holding by approximately 26% to about 5.1 million shares.

These increases matter because they signal that Morgan Stanley’s crypto ETF footprint is not limited to Bitcoin. For market participants, large incremental allocations to Ether products can be interpreted as broader institutional participation—especially when the increases span both mainstream spot-style Ether exposure (ETHA) and products linked to staking (Grayscale’s staking-focused mini fund).

In addition, Morgan Stanley initiated new exposure to Solana-related funds. The filing showed additions to Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and Fidelity’s Solana fund (FSOL), with those positions reported at about $4.25 million and $2.26 million, respectively.

Circle and mining/infrastructure names show selective momentum

Beyond ETFs, Morgan Stanley also adjusted its holdings in crypto-adjacent public companies. The firm dramatically increased its reported stake in Circle Internet Group (CRCL), the company behind the USDC stablecoin. According to the Q2 filing, Circle shares rose from roughly 1.46 million to about 8.32 million.

Advertisement

On the mining and infrastructure side, the filing reflected additions to several names, including Cipher Digital (CIFR), Core Scientific (CORZ), Hut 8 (HUT), and Bitdeer Technologies (BTDR). For investors tracking institutional risk appetite, expanding positions across multiple miners and infrastructure providers can indicate confidence in the sector’s operational resilience—or at least a willingness to accumulate exposure while valuations and market conditions fluctuate.

However, the changes were not uniformly positive across every crypto-linked equity. Morgan Stanley reported about 550,000 fewer shares of Coinbase (COIN). It also cut its CleanSpark (CLSK) position by more than 3.1 million shares and fully exited a roughly 8 million-share holding in Bitfarms (BITF).

That mix—adding in some areas while trimming others—suggests a more selective approach rather than a broad increase across the entire crypto equity basket.

What to watch after Morgan Stanley’s Q2 adjustments

Going into the next reporting period, investors will likely focus on whether Morgan Stanley continues to build its ETF share counts—particularly in IBIT and ETHA—or whether the firm’s activity reverts toward valuation-driven changes as crypto prices move. The SEC 13F updates also remain a key way to observe institutional positioning shifts, even though they are inherently lagging compared with day-to-day market flows.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Morgan Stanley’s BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Holdings Rise 23% in Q2

Published

on

Morgan Stanley’s BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Holdings Rise 23% in Q2

US investment banking giant Morgan Stanley reported larger crypto fund positions in the second quarter, led by an increase of more than 3 million shares in BlackRock’s Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Morgan Stanley’s reported holdings in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) increased by 23% to around 16.5 million shares from 13.4 million, according to its Q2 13F filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday.

Morgan Stanley also reported 2.57 million shares of its own Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT), worth about $43.3 million. The product began trading in April.

The filing showed increases across several direct crypto fund positions in Q2, even as reported holdings declined in Coinbase and some other crypto-linked companies.

Advertisement

Morgan Stanley grows Bitcoin and Ether ETF exposure

Despite adding about 3.04 million IBIT shares, the position’s value fell about 18% to $549 million from $667 million as Bitcoin fell during the quarter.

Morgan Stanley also sharply increased several smaller Bitcoin ETF positions, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB), while its Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) holding rose nearly 38%.

Bitcoin (BTC) price chart year-to-date. Source: CoinGecko

Ether holdings grew as well, with Morgan Stanley increasing its iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) position by about 202% to 4.6 million shares and its Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) position by about 26% to 5.1 million shares.

Related: Italy’s biggest bank triples staked Ether ETF holdings while cutting IBIT shares

Advertisement

In addition to initiating its MSBT position, Morgan Stanley added new exposure to the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL), worth about $4.25 million and $2.26 million, respectively.

Circle and Bitcoin miners gain ground

Morgan Stanley made an even larger move in Circle Internet Group (CRCL), the company behind the USDC stablecoin, with reported holdings increasing from about 1.46 million shares to 8.32 million shares.

The filing also showed substantial additions to several Bitcoin mining and infrastructure companies, including Cipher Digital (CIFR), Core Scientific (CORZ), Hut 8 (HUT) and Bitdeer Technologies (BTDR).

Not every crypto-linked position grew. Morgan Stanley reported about 550,000 fewer Coinbase (COIN) shares, cut its CleanSpark (CLSK) position by more than 3.1 million shares and fully exited a roughly 8 million-share Bitfarms (BITF) position.

Advertisement

Magazine: Bitcoin will never fall below $60K again: Nansen founder

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Payward Revenue Grows 17% Despite Weaker Crypto Spot Trading

Published

on

Payward Revenue Grows 17% Despite Weaker Crypto Spot Trading

Cointelegraph is committed to providing independent, high-quality journalism across the crypto, blockchain, AI, and fintech industries.

All news, reviews, and analyses are produced with full journalistic independence and integrity. For more details on our standards and processes, please read our Editorial Policy.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

RedotPay US IPO Push Paused as Regulatory and Legal Issues Grow

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

RedotPay’s planned US initial public offering (IPO) has reportedly been pushed back as the stablecoin payments firm focuses on expanding into the United States. Bloomberg reported on Friday that the timing of the offering has been delayed, citing people familiar with the matter as RedotPay works through regulatory approvals and ongoing legal disputes.

A RedotPay representative declined to comment on specific IPO timing when asked by Cointelegraph. Instead, the company highlighted its near-term operational priorities, saying it obtained a US money transmitter license this week and is preparing to launch its product in the country.

Key takeaways

  • Bloomberg reports RedotPay’s US IPO plans have been delayed while the company pursues additional approvals and manages legal risk.
  • RedotPay says it secured a US money transmitter license this week and is preparing a US product launch.
  • The delay comes amid a lawsuit in which Binance affiliates are seeking nearly $473 million in damages.
  • RedotPay has previously discussed a potential New York listing and has also explored raising additional funding ahead of a public-market debut.

US IPO ambitions meet a shifting priority list

RedotPay first drew attention in February, when reports said the company was considering a New York listing. At the time, the prospect included the involvement of major Wall Street firms—JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies Financial Group were reported to be involved—and RedotPay was said to be targeting a valuation above $4 billion.

Bloomberg’s latest report frames the IPO slowdown less as a withdrawal of intent and more as a timing adjustment: RedotPay appears to be working to strengthen its US compliance footing while legal challenges continue to play out. For investors and market watchers, the practical question is whether the company can align its regulatory rollout with public-market readiness, especially in a US environment where stablecoin-related businesses face heightened scrutiny.

Separately, Cointelegraph reported earlier this year that RedotPay had been in discussions to raise as much as $150 million, even as it adjusted its organization to support a potential “unicorn” transition. Those reported funding and leadership changes suggest RedotPay was already positioning itself for a future listing—making any IPO deferral notable for shareholders watching catalysts and timelines.

Advertisement

New US licensing is a near-term catalyst

While RedotPay’s IPO timetable appears to have moved, the company’s immediate focus is its US expansion. According to a statement provided to Cointelegraph, RedotPay obtained a money transmitter license in the US this week and is preparing to launch its product in the country.

That licensing step matters because it speaks directly to whether a stablecoin payments business can operate with the regulatory infrastructure required in the United States. If the company’s launch proceeds as planned, it could help RedotPay generate real-world traction in one of the most important markets for crypto-adjacent payment services—even if the public offering itself takes longer than originally contemplated.

Still, the licensing win does not automatically resolve everything needed for an IPO. Public listings typically require a clear path through regulatory and legal uncertainties, along with disclosure and risk management that underwriters and boards must be comfortable with. RedotPay’s recent legal entanglements therefore remain a central factor shaping how quickly investors may see a filing or public-market debut.

Binance lawsuit raises pressure on timing and risk profile

Legal issues have intensified around RedotPay. Earlier in August, Binance affiliates filed a lawsuit in Hong Kong against RedotPay’s founders, seeking nearly $473 million in damages. The plaintiffs allege that confidential information—obtained through prior work with Binance—was used to build a competing payments business and to attract Binance users to RedotPay.

Advertisement

RedotPay denies the allegations and told Cointelegraph it would “vigorously defend all claims.” Even so, litigation of this size can affect corporate decision-making, particularly for companies weighing a US IPO where due diligence, disclosures, and investor risk appetite are tightly linked to ongoing disputes.

The conflict has also spread into Singapore. Cointelegraph previously reported that Binance and RedotPay disagree on the outcome of a related case. RedotPay told Cointelegraph this week that it expected Binance to discontinue that matter, while Binance rejected RedotPay’s account and stated its claims remain active.

This multi-jurisdiction picture is part of what may be pushing IPO timing later. For potential investors, it creates uncertainty around the company’s future legal costs, settlement risk, and potential operational distractions—factors that can weigh on underwriting timelines and the composition of any public-market narrative.

What to watch next for RedotPay

RedotPay’s next moves likely hinge on two tracks running in parallel: regulatory execution in the US and the evolution of its legal disputes. The company’s money transmitter license and planned product launch provide a concrete operational milestone, but the reported IPO delay suggests that legal overhang still matters for capital market plans.

Advertisement

For readers tracking the story, the key developments to monitor are whether RedotPay’s US launch progresses smoothly, whether any court proceedings shift in the Binance-related cases, and whether RedotPay revises its earlier public-market timeline after regulatory and legal questions become clearer.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Long Positions for XRP Rise as It Tests Critical Support at $1

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Long positions in XRP have grown rapidly over the last few weeks, with well over $1.5 billion worth of exposure being added to the derivatives market since the start of August.

This buildup of leverage exposure is indicative of increased bullish positioning among traders who expect the coin to stage a recovery.

According to Crypto Rover, XRP is building up “parabolic” exposure, and this has been attributed to the recent growth in long positions. It is evident from the above chart that exposure has been steadily increasing to reach around $1.596 billion.

Notably, while futures exposure growth might indicate similar demand for XRP in the spot markets, it is possible for traders to build up such exposure without buying any XRP at all.

Advertisement

XRP Testing $1 Support as Price Structure Narrows

XRP is currently trading at $1.0056, and the psychological $1.00 level has been the focus of the present market structure. For the past few months starting from February, the daily chart has created lower highs under a descending trendline, thus signifying that sellers have been controlling the market more.

Another trendline has been created since June on the $1.00 support level, thereby forming a narrowing structure in the form of a descending wedge. Now, XRP is nearing an important level as the price narrows under both support and descending resistance levels.

The crucial resistance level is seen in the range of $1.10–$1.15. Any daily close above this region will make the existing bearish market structure weaker and move the market toward the next technical level of $1.20. In case of a breakdown below $1.00, the current setup will be invalidated.

Weak RSI Keeps Momentum Under Pressure

Momentum indicators are keeping their guard up. The daily RSI comes in at 35.64, while the moving average holds at 39.90. Both figures continue trading below the neutral 50 line, suggesting that bearish momentum is still prevailing within the overall pattern.

Advertisement

On the other hand, the RSI approaches the oversold area. Although this is a signal that selling has gone too far, it does not mean that a reversal will happen immediately. Traders may want to see some RSI recovery before calling the momentum change a definite one.

Trading volume also remains relevant. Previously, lower levels had been seen alongside increased trading, while consolidation is now seen amid low volume. This means buyers have not shown enough interest in the asset yet.

Crowded Longs Lead to a Double-Edged Structure

The emergence of more bullish XRP longs, along with $1 support and a squeezed price range, creates a high-risk structure. If spot demand improves and XRP breaks above $1.10–$1.15, the bullish positioning could help to continue the uptrend toward $1.20.

Nevertheless, if XRP fails to hold $1.00, the situation could turn out differently. In such an event, crowded longs could get liquidated, adding to downside momentum.

Advertisement

XRP is now at a crossroads in terms of the technical picture. A breakout from descending resistance lines would indicate a rally, while a daily close below $1.00 could confirm the bearish structure.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025