Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Japanese giant SBI Holdings to buy Bitbank for $289 million

Published

on

Nomura pushes back on crypto retreat concerns as it tightens risk controls

Japanese financial services giant SBI Holdings said it agreed to buy cryptocurrency exchange Bitbank for around $289 million.

The Tokyo-based bank first floated the idea at the start of last month, framing it as part of a broader strategy to expand its crypto business ahead of potential regulatory developments in Japan. It bought crypto exchange Bitpoint in 2022.

Japan is in the process of bringing cryptocurrencies under the umbrella of financial products as authorized by the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, which applies to stocks and other securities. This could take effect from early next fiscal year.

Bitbank is among Japan’s top 10 largest crypto exchanges by trading activity, according to CoinGecko, processing 24-hour volume of just under $50 million. Competitors such as Toobit, CoinW, Kraken and Bitmart all process in excess of $1 billion.

Advertisement

SBI said the acquisition, which is subject to regulatory approval, is set to close in October in a statement on Thursday.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

AI Agents Bring New Rules for Crypto Wallets

Published

on

AI Agents Bring New Rules for Crypto Wallets

AI agents are entering crypto through wallets, exchanges, payment apps, trading systems, and portfolio tools. Once an agent receives signing authority, it can prepare transactions, rebalance assets, pay invoices, use smart contracts, and move across on-chain apps at software speed.

This creates a new product category around controlled autonomy. The user keeps ownership of the funds, while software handles repetitive execution under rules set in advance.

BeInCrypto spoke with Fernando Lillo Aranda, CMO at Zoomex; Federico Variola, CEO of Phemex; and Adrian Wall, Managing Director of the Digital Sovereignty Alliance, about early use cases, transaction approval, user limits, on-chain activity, and new risks once agents gain access to funds.

Payments Come First

Adrian Wall sees payments as the earliest major use case for AI agents, since payment mandates can be narrowed by amount, recipient, asset type, and timing.

Advertisement

“Payments are the earliest use case because the parameters are well-defined and the mandate is constrained,” Wall said.

Stablecoins make cross-border payments a natural area for agent activity, especially in markets where bank transfers remain slow, expensive, or difficult to reconcile.

“Cross-border payments are especially compelling given the friction in legacy banking and the demonstrated efficiency of stablecoins,” Wall said.

Trading and portfolio management are also ready from a technical view, but Wall placed more emphasis on governance than execution.

“Trading and portfolio management are technically mature enough today,” he said, adding the harder challenge is “whether authorization frameworks and loss limits are sophisticated enough to keep an agent’s mandate from drifting beyond what the user intended.”

Identity may take longer, although Wall said decentralized identifiers and agent-assisted verification could reduce repeat authentication across fragmented digital services.

“The combination of decentralized identifiers and agent-driven verification is promising because it could reduce the burden on users who currently authenticate themselves repeatedly across fragmented systems,” Wall said.

Wallet Approvals Need Transaction-by-Transaction Controls

Wallets were built around human review, while agents may prepare many actions across apps, contracts, and venues. Wall said wallet design now has to connect product choices with policy expectations.

Advertisement

“The approval question is where policy and product design must converge, and it is where the industry has the most work left to do,” Wall said.

A strong approval model gives agents limited authority for routine actions while requiring human review for withdrawals, leverage, new contracts, and large swaps.

“What we need is a tiered authorization model where the level of scrutiny matches the potential impact of the transaction,” Wall said.

This approach can separate monitoring, trade preparation, execution, and fund movement. A user may permit an agent to watch positions and draft trades, while reserving withdrawals and new contract access for manual approval.

Fund Access Should Grow in Stages

Fernando Lillo Aranda said AI agents can improve automation, but users should give capital access gradually.

“AI agents can unlock automation, but capital access should always be progressive,” Lillo Aranda said.

He described the process as a gradual path from observation to assistance and execution. In practice, the agent first monitors and recommends, then prepares actions for approval, later receives limited execution rights, and eventually handles a larger mandate after reliable performance.

Advertisement

Capital controls come first. Lillo Aranda said users should “cap maximum allocation, daily loss, position size, and withdrawal amounts.”

Permission controls come next. Users should “separate permissions for monitoring, trading, rebalancing, and fund movement,” he said.

Time limits also reduce exposure from old approvals. Lillo Aranda said agent access should “require periodic re-authorization instead of permanent access.”

Market boundaries can prevent agents from entering assets, venues, or leverage levels outside the user’s comfort zone. Users should “restrict assets, leverage, venues, and volatility conditions where the agent can operate,” he said.

Human override remains the final guardrail. Lillo Aranda pointed to “instant pause, approval thresholds, alerts, and rollback mechanisms” as essential user controls.

Wall also put spending caps at the center of user protection. He said users should start low and raise limits only after observing how the agent behaves across market conditions and instruction types.

Advertisement

“The first and most fundamental limit is a spending cap, set low at the outset and adjusted upward only as the user develops confidence in how the agent behaves across market conditions and instruction types,” Wall said.

Above a preset threshold, human approval should remain in place even after an agent builds a good track record.

“The asymmetry between an interrupted transaction and an unauthorized one almost always favors interruption,” Wall said.

On-Chain Volume Needs Economic Purpose

Federico Variola said AI agents can create meaningful on-chain activity because blockchain apps let software move across many products and strategies.

“Yes, AI agents can create meaningful on-chain volume, especially because on-chain environments offer composability and flexibility across different strategies,” Variola said.

Those strategies may include spot trading, perpetual futures, lending, borrowing, and future products linked to assets beyond native crypto.

“This could include spot, perpetual futures, lending, borrowing, and eventually products outside native crypto assets as well,” Variola said.

Variola drew a line between activity with economic use and recursive trading among agents.

Advertisement

“A lot of on-chain activity today is still driven by human sentiment and greed,” he said.

Durable agent volume, in his view, depends on activity tied to productive use across on-chain ecosystems.

“Agents need to create or support real economic value,” Variola said.

Wall expects much of today’s agent activity to begin inside controlled app environments before moving on-chain as products and rules mature.

“Agents on public blockchains can access far more counterparties, assets, and protocols than any walled garden allows,” Wall said.

He expects trading and arbitrage to appear first, followed by treasury and settlement activity.

“The impact will show up in volume before it shows up in value, first driven by high frequency trading and arbitrage, and later by treasury management and institutional settlement,” Wall said.

Agent Risk Moves at Software Speed

Once agents gain signing rights, familiar crypto risks become faster and harder to contain. Wall highlighted mandate drift, exploit propagation, perception manipulation, and correlated market behavior.

Advertisement

“When software can trade, sign, and interact with smart contracts on a user’s behalf, four familiar risks become newly dangerous,” Wall said.

The first problem is mandate drift, where an agent moves beyond the user’s original instruction set.

“Agents can exceed their mandate,” Wall said.

The second problem is speed. An exploit can move through many connected wallets or contracts before a user sees the damage.

“Exploits can propagate at machine speed across every wallet an agent touches before any human notices,” Wall said.

The third problem comes from manipulated inputs. Attackers may feed an agent fake prompts, poisoned data, or malicious contract information, causing harmful actions even when the user keeps custody of the key.

Market behavior creates another concern when many agents rely on similar data sources, strategies, and models. In those conditions, many systems can sell, rebalance, or withdraw liquidity at the same time.

Advertisement

Wall said markets can destabilize when agents “respond rationally to the same inputs at the same time.”

Final Thoughts

AI agents will reach crypto wallets through constrained tasks first: payments, rebalancing, subscriptions, trading, and portfolio support. These use cases can operate under defined limits, measured permissions, and regular user review.

The strongest wallet model will center on controlled autonomy: scoped permissions, session keys, spending caps, renewal windows, whitelisted counterparties, approval thresholds, alerts, and emergency pause controls.

On-chain volume can grow if agents handle payments, settlement, treasury, and asset operations tied to economic use. Recursive trading among agents may increase transaction counts, but lasting value comes from activity tied to people, businesses, assets, and services.

Advertisement

The post AI Agents Bring New Rules for Crypto Wallets appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Chainlink price remains under pressure in bearish channel, is $6 next?

Published

on

Chainlink weekly chart showing a prolonged downtrend as price approaches the key $5.50-$6.30 support zone with bearish RSI and MACD.

Chainlink has extended its weekly decline after a sell-the-news reaction to Project Pangea, a multi-billion-dollar options expiry, and persistent weakness across the crypto market pushed LINK back toward a key long-term support zone.

Summary

  • Chainlink has dropped to the $7 support zone as a sell-the-news reaction and options expiry intensified selling pressure.
  • A bearish channel, weak momentum indicators, and the Supertrend signal keep the risk of a move toward $6 alive.
  • Analysts identify the $6.30 support area as critical, while a recovery above $7.70 could ease downside pressure.

According to crypto.news price data, Chainlink (LINK) fell from a June 22 high near $8 to an intraday low of around $7 on June 26 before stabilizing near $7.16 at press time.

LINK’s drop accelerated as traders locked in profits following the June 23 launch of Project Pangea, a global foreign-exchange infrastructure initiative developed alongside European and South Korean banking consortia representing more than $10 trillion in assets under management.

Advertisement

Although the initiative strengthened Chainlink’s long-term enterprise case, short-term sentiment deteriorated ahead of Friday’s estimated $11 billion crypto options expiry. The large derivatives event pushed many digital assets toward their max-pain levels, triggering liquidations across leveraged altcoin positions and adding fresh selling pressure to LINK.

Macro conditions also remained unfavorable. Bitcoin’s drop below the $60,000 level weighed on the broader altcoin market as investors continued reducing exposure to risk assets. Consecutive weeks of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF outflows, expectations that the Federal Reserve could keep interest rates elevated for longer, and delays surrounding U.S. crypto legislation further reduced appetite for speculative assets. At the same time, institutional capital continued rotating into artificial intelligence-related equities instead of digital assets.

Derivatives positioning has offered little relief. Leveraged long liquidations accelerated as LINK lost successive support levels, while declining open interest and cautious positioning suggested traders have reduced directional exposure rather than attempting aggressive dip buying.

Advertisement

Weekly structure keeps long-term downside risk in focus

On the weekly chart, LINK remains in a prolonged downtrend after failing to reclaim resistance near $8. The latest decline has brought the token close to a multi-year support area around $5.50-$6.30, where buyers repeatedly entered the market during previous corrections.

Chainlink weekly chart showing a prolonged downtrend as price approaches the key $5.50-$6.30 support zone with bearish RSI and MACD.
Chainlink weekly price chart — June 26 | Source: crypto.news

Momentum indicators continue to favor sellers. The weekly RSI has dropped to around 34 and remains below its signal line without entering deeply oversold territory, leaving room for another leg lower. Meanwhile, the MACD remains below the zero line despite a modest narrowing of bearish momentum, showing that bulls have yet to regain control.

A decisive weekly close beneath the long-term support zone could expose the psychological $6 level, while a sustained recovery above $8 would be needed to weaken the current bearish structure.

Bearish channel and Supertrend cap any recovery attempts

The four-hour chart shows LINK trading inside a well-defined descending channel that has guided the price lower since June 22. Every rebound has stalled near the upper trendline, while the Supertrend indicator continues to print a sell signal with dynamic resistance around $7.70.

Chainlink 4-hour chart showing price trading inside a descending channel below Supertrend resistance near $7.70.
Chainlink 4-hour price chart — June 26 | Source: crypto.news

MACD on the four-hour timeframe remains below the zero line, although the histogram has flattened after the latest selloff, suggesting bearish momentum has slowed rather than reversed. Unless buyers reclaim the channel resistance and break above the Supertrend barrier, the path of least resistance remains lower.

Failure to defend the $7 region could send LINK toward the $6.30 support identified by Martinez, with the major psychological $6 level becoming the next downside target. On the upside, reclaiming $7.70 could allow the token to challenge the $8 resistance zone, where sellers regained control earlier this week.

Advertisement

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strategy STRC June 30 ex-dividend date and dividend rate reset explained

Published

on

Strategy's (MSTR) bitcoin purchase fails to stir BTC price: Crypto Markets Today

Strategy’s (MSTR) perpetual preferred stock, STRC, is down 3% during Friday’s pre-market and is trading below $73 around 27% below its $100 par value, as investors focus on June 30, a date that brings two important events.

First, June 30 is the ex-dividend date. Investors who own shares before the ex-dividend date will receive the next payment, while buyers on or after June 30 will not. The date also serves as the record date, when Strategy shareholders qualify for the distribution. Eligible investors will receive STRC’s first semi-monthly dividend of $0.48 per share on July 15.

Normally, a stock declines by roughly the amount of its dividend when it begins trading ex-dividend. For STRC, a $0.48 adjustment on a $73 stock represents less than 0.7%, during a time when STRC is falling as much as 2-3% a day. So the ex-dividend date in theory should not be a huge catalyst for further downside in the STRC price.

The bigger catalyst is Strategy’s monthly dividend rate reset. STRC is a perpetual preferred stock, meaning it has no maturity date and pays a dividend that can be reset periodically.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin’s first-half solace is it fell less than Strategy (MSTR): Crypto Daily

Published

on

Bitcoin's first-half solace is it fell less than Strategy (MSTR): Crypto Daily

As the first half of 2026 draws to a close, major cryptocurrencies are deeply in the red, lagging far behind traditional assets. Bitcoin bulls can at least take one small consolation: they’ve outperformed shares in bitcoin-holder Strategy (MSTR).

These diverging trends point to investor preference for assets linked to economic activity and geopolitical trends rather than narrative-led plays.

While bitcoin, the crypto market leader by market capitalization, is down 32% as June nears an end, ether has slumped 47% and Strategy 43%. The total crypto market cap has declined by roughly 30% to nearly $2 trillion, a level not seen since before President Donald Trump’s election victory in November 2024.

Most of the biggest coins are down, except a select few like HYPE, which has gained over 140%. HYPE’s strength is the result of increased volatility and the stellar performance of TradFi-linked assets available on its parent decentralized exchange, Hyperliquid.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Post Deribit Settlement, BTC Survived the Selling Wave

Published

on

btc logo

Bitcoin price absorbed a huge body blow and bearish prediction, and stayed on its feet. BTC forced to fall under $60,000 after a 3% daily drop while Ethereum slid harder, down by more than 5% to around $1,510, and neither coin is anywhere close to where options market makers wanted them.

Friday’s Deribit expiry ranked as the quarter’s largest options event, with $10.63 billion in combined BTC and ETH notional contracts settling in a single session. Bitcoin’s slice came in at $9.06 billion across 92,154 calls and 57,652 puts, against Ethereum’s $1.57 billion.

Our analysts flagged that puts continue to command a meaningful premium over calls across all major tenors, with Bitcoin’s 25-delta skew printing -10.7% at one day and -11.3% at seven days. That skew confirms traders were paying for downside protection heading into settlement, instead of chasing upside.

Advertisement

Now that the expiry has cleared and positioning resets, where will Bitcoin go next?

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Bitcoin Price Prediction: $70,000?

Bitcoin trades at $60,000, or about 14% below the $70,000 max-pain level. However, the gap is not only about options positioning, but selling pressure also stayed firm after the recent expiry, while buyers failed to trigger a meaningful rebound.

Advertisement

For now, the key area sits between $58,000 and $60,000. Holding that range would keep the recent pullback under control. On the upside, Bitcoin faces resistance near $63,000 to $65,000, with a stronger ceiling around $67,000 and $68,000.

If support remains intact, price could gradually work its way back toward $65,000. That would suggest sellers are losing momentum. A stronger move higher would likely require fresh demand and improving market sentiment.

Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit

The most likely outcome remains consolidation. Bitcoin may continue moving between $58,000 and $63,000 as traders wait for the next catalyst. Until then, price action could stay uneven and directionless.

Advertisement

A drop below $58,000 would weaken the near-term outlook. In that case, the next major support sits near $54,000. Meanwhile, Ethereum has fallen faster than Bitcoin recently, showing that risk appetite across crypto remains fragile. 21% below its $2,000 max pain level suggests its options positioning was even more out of whack, and it may lag any BTC recovery attempt.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Bitcoin Hyper Draws Early-Stage Interest as BTC Tests Critical Support

Bitcoin at $60,200 with a negative skew and macro headwinds is a tough spot for spot holders. The upside to max pain is real but not guaranteed on any near-term timeline. That gap between where BTC needs to go and where it actually trades is exactly the kind of environment where early-stage infrastructure plays start attracting rotational capital looking for asymmetric exposure.

Advertisement

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is positioning itself as the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with full Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, targeting the core limitations that have historically kept BTC sidelined. It addresses BTC from the smart contract ecosystem: slow transactions, high fees, and limited programmability.

The presale has raised closer to $33 million at a current price of $0.0136, with staking available at high APY for early participants. The architecture pairs a decentralized canonical bridge for BTC transfers with extremely low-latency execution. The pitch is faster smart contract performance than Solana’s, while inheriting Bitcoin’s security layer.

Research Bitcoin Hyper’s presale details here.

The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: Post Deribit Settlement, BTC Survived the Selling Wave appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin ETFs See Biggest Daily Outflows Since June as BTC Drops Below $60K

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) saw their largest daily net outflows of June on Thursday, withdrawing $696.3 million as Bitcoin slipped below $60,000. The selloff in ETF demand added to a broader cooling in institutional appetite for the asset during the month.

SoSoValue data shows the withdrawals pushed June’s cumulative net outflows to $3.61 billion, taking year-to-date net outflows to $4.6 billion. For investors tracking institutional flows, Thursday’s figures underscored how quickly sentiment can shift when price weakness triggers faster redemptions from ETF wrappers.

Key takeaways

  • US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $696.3 million in net outflows on Thursday, the largest day of June.
  • June outflows total $3.61 billion, with year-to-date net outflows at $4.6 billion, according to SoSoValue.
  • ETF total net assets dropped to about $72.6 billion—down roughly 57% from a peak of $169.5 billion recorded in October 2025.
  • WalletPilot data indicates US spot Bitcoin ETFs held 1.24 million BTC as of Tuesday, with about 63,500 BTC leaving over the past 30 days.
  • Strategy’s Bitcoin buying slowed materially in June to about 3,600 BTC, intensifying debate about whether it should conserve cash during drawdowns.

Spot Bitcoin ETF outflows accelerate as price weakens

The timing of Thursday’s ETF outflows is notable: they came as Bitcoin moved through the $60,000 area, a level that has often acted as a psychological pivot for market participants. In that context, SoSoValue’s figures point to a stronger-than-usual willingness among ETF investors to exit positions during a short-term downswing.

SoSoValue reported that June’s outflows already surpassed a prior monthly high—$519.2 million logged on June 2—before extending even further on Thursday. With June net outflows now at $3.61 billion, the pattern suggests that redemptions are not just sporadic, but persistent enough to compound quickly.

That matters because spot ETFs are one of the most accessible channels for traditional capital. While other markets can absorb volatility, sustained ETF outflows typically remove a steady source of incremental demand. Traders often watch these flow metrics for confirmation that spot selling is spreading beyond spot exchanges and into regulated products.

Advertisement

ETF assets shrink sharply from the sector’s 2025 peak

Alongside daily flow data, the broader balance-sheet picture for the ETF complex has weakened. According to SoSoValue, total net assets for US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs fell below $73 billion for the first time since late 2024.

SoSoValue cited a peak of $169.5 billion in October 2025. By Friday, that figure stood at roughly $72.6 billion—an approximate 57% decline. Even without assuming any change in investor behavior beyond price, the reduction reflects both falling BTC value and net withdrawals from the funds.

Complementing that, WalletPilot data shows US spot Bitcoin ETFs held a combined 1.24 million BTC as of Tuesday. Over the prior 30 days, about 63,500 BTC left the products. For readers trying to separate price effects from flow effects, this distinction is critical: holdings dropping over a month signals that the outflows are affecting the underlying exposure, not just the market valuation.

Strategy’s June slowdown raises questions over capital discipline

As ETF demand cooled, another large institutional-style buyer also moderated its pace. Strategy—frequently cited as the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder—purchased about 3,600 Bitcoin so far in June, according to Strategy filings. That rate is far below its recent activity: roughly 25,000 BTC in May and more than 50,000 BTC in April.

Advertisement

The slowing has fueled discussion around whether the company should continue accumulating aggressively during market drawdowns, or instead rebuild liquidity. The debate intensified after Strategy recorded a net sale of 32 BTC earlier in the month, an uncommon move during its broader accumulation period.

Some analysts argue that Strategy should pause purchases and preserve cash until conditions improve. Earlier coverage by Cointelegraph noted scrutiny around Strategy’s broader financial posture, including aspects of how it manages dividend coverage. In the current environment, such questions have become harder to ignore as both ETF flows and price momentum have weakened.

STRC share pressure, and the “self-repairing” debate

Part of the scrutiny has centered on Strategy’s perpetual preferred stock, STRC, which has traded below its intended $100 benchmark. On Thursday, STRC closed at $75.69, down 6.37%. The price action has contributed to renewed debate about whether Strategy’s financing mechanics are robust during volatility.

CryptoQuant analysts raised concerns about Strategy’s timing and risk management. Others, including Bitcoin advocate Samson Mow, pushed back by pointing to a feature described as a “self-repairing mechanism.” In an X post, Mow said that when STRC trades below its $100 benchmark, Strategy pauses new share issuance through its ATM program at that level, limiting new supply.

Advertisement

At the same time, the fundamental question for investors remains whether pauses in issuance and changes in acquisition pace translate into long-term restraint or just short-term adjustment. Strategy’s pace of buying can influence market psychology, particularly because the company is often viewed as a persistent demand backstop—something that may become less reliable if the market downturn causes repeated slowdowns.

Looking ahead, readers should watch whether ETF outflows continue to dominate daily flow prints and whether holdings shrink further month-over-month. In parallel, Strategy’s next purchase cadence and any further signals from STRC’s trading dynamics could clarify whether June represents a temporary slowdown—or the start of a more durable shift in institutional behavior.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SharpLink Resumes ETH Buying After 8-Month Hiatus but OG Whales Capitulate

Published

on

With the latest major price moves (and mostly corrections) in the cryptocurrency markets, certain major players and whales have returned to act accordingly.

However, on-chain data from Lookonchain shows significant divergence between what SharpLink and some OG whales did. Here’s the Ethereum edition.

SharpLink Buys

Riding the wave of cryptocurrency treasury companies that started accumulating in 2024/2025, Joe Lubin’s SharpLink began its ETH acquisition in the summer of 2025 and quickly became one of the largest players in the broader Ethereum ecosystem. Similar to Bitmine, it kept buying new tokens as prices rose and its position quickly skyrocketed to almost $1 billion in unrealized profits by early October.

Then came the cycle-changing event in that same early October when the entire market collapsed, leaving over $19 billion in liquidations. Ethereum, similar to almost all other assets, has not been the same ever since, with its price tumbling by 70% from the 2025 ATH to under $1,550 as of now.

Advertisement

Interestingly, unlike Bitmine, which kept accumulating for the most part during this extended bear phase, SharpLink stood on the sidelines. This finally changed after the latest Thursday crash, as the company halted its 8-month break to acquire almost $8 million worth of ETH. It holds 876,285 ETH (valued at $1.4 billion), which includes 22,102 ETH earned from staking.

However, its position is deep in the red as its average acquisition price stands at $3,609. Its unrealized loss, according to Lookonchain, is at $1.7 billion.

Meanwhile, Bitmine, which stands on a whopping unrealized loss of around $10 billion, continues to accumulate and stake the majority of its ETH tokens. In the latest update on the matter, the Tom Lee-chaired company staked another $250 million worth of ETH.

OG Whale Capitulates

Another publication from Lookonchain shows that, in contrast to SharpLink, OG Ethereum whales have gone on a selling spree. Four such wallets received 37,602 ETH 8 years ago when the asset traded at $830. Their unrealized profits had risen to over $150 million during the 2021 and 2025 bull runs, but they refrained from selling.

Advertisement

However, they began disposing of their assets after the latest crash, which drove ETH to just over $1,500. As of press time, they had sold 33,623 ETH as their current profit sits at $27.4 million.

The post SharpLink Resumes ETH Buying After 8-Month Hiatus but OG Whales Capitulate appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Polymarket Third-Party Vendor Compromise Drains $2.9M from Users

Published

on

Polymarket Third-Party Vendor Compromise Drains $2.9M from Users

A third-party vendor compromise discovered Thursday allowed attackers to inject a malicious script into Polymarket’s frontend, affecting multiple users.

Blockchain analyst Specter said the malicious script appeared to facilitate a phishing attack that drained an estimated $2.94 million from at least 11 Polymarket user wallets.

Polymarket said on X that the compromise has been contained and that the affected dependency has been removed. It added that users would be fully refunded.

Cointelegraph has approached Polymarket for comment but did not receive a response before publication.

Advertisement

The attack was the 89th reported crypto security breach of the second quarter, according to DefiLlama data, extending the most-hacked quarter on record by incident count.

Source: Specter

Crypto exploit losses reach $74.9M across 29 June incidents

Crypto exploit losses climbed to $74.9 million across 29 reported incidents in June, surpassing May’s $60.5 million total but remaining far below April’s $644 million, according to DefiLlama data.

Total value hacked by monthly sum, 1-year chart. Source: DefiLlama.

Advertisement

The largest June incidents included the $36 million Humanity Protocol exploit, the $4.7 million Secret Network bridge exploit, two separate Aztec exploits worth $2.1 million each and a $1.7 million bridge exploit on Taiko.

Related: About 60% of World Cup bettors on Polymarket are first-time crypto users

Over the past 30 days, private key compromises accounted for 43% of reported exploit losses, making them the leading attack vector, according to DefiLlama. Fake proof exploits accounted for 10%, followed by reverse MEV honeypots at 8%, which present deceptive trading opportunities to lure and manipulate automated trading bots.

About a month before Polymarket’s latest attack, the prediction market disclosed a separate $600,000 exploit that was traced to a six-year-old private key used for internal top-up operations. Josh Stevens, Polymarket’s vice president of engineering, said the platform’s contracts and user funds remained safe and that all permissions tied to the key had since been revoked.

Advertisement

Total value hacked by technique over the past 30 days. Source: DefiLlama

Polymarket currently holds over $450 million in total value locked, up 301% from $112 million a year ago, according to DefiLlama.

Magazine: Should users be allowed to bet on war and death in prediction markets?

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Base Pushes Beryl Mainnet Launch to June 26 for B20 Registry Completion

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Highlights

  • Base postpones Beryl implementation by 24 hours to ensure B20 registry readiness
  • B20 token standard introduces native support for stablecoins and real-world assets
  • Registry initialization must complete before native B20 token deployment can proceed
  • Withdrawal timeframe from Base to Ethereum reduced from seven days to five days
  • Integration of Reth V2 promises up to 50% reduction in node storage requirements

The Ethereum layer 2 network Base has postponed its Beryl mainnet implementation by 24 hours to ensure proper B20 Activation Registry configuration. Beryl will now go live on June 26 at 18:00 UTC, providing additional time for the registry to initialize before the hard fork executes.

B20 Registry Initialization Necessitates Schedule Adjustment

Base initially targeted June 25 for Beryl’s launch, but development teams discovered a critical timing dependency. The B20 Activation Registry needs to complete its initialization sequence before developers can begin deploying native B20 tokens. This initialization process could take up to 60 minutes following activation.

The registry manages B20 feature flag availability throughout the network post-hard fork. To prevent activating Beryl before these critical functions were operational, the team rescheduled the mainnet deployment. While the timeline has shifted, the upgrade’s technical components remain unchanged.

Beryl brings B20 to Base—a protocol-native token standard designed specifically for stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets. B20 tokens function through Rust precompiles embedded directly within Base node software, unlike conventional ERC-20 contracts. Despite this fundamental difference, B20 maintains full ERC-20 compatibility and incorporates ERC-2612 permit functionality.

Enhanced Token Management and Accelerated Bridge Transfers

The B20 Issuer Toolkit provides comprehensive features including role-based permissions, minting and burning controls, transfer restrictions, and configurable supply limits. Additionally, it offers freeze and seizure capabilities for token issuers navigating regulatory compliance requirements. These functionalities embed core token governance directly into the protocol rather than relying on external smart contracts.

Advertisement

Beryl simultaneously decreases the standard withdrawal duration from Base to Ethereum from seven days down to five days. The majority of bridge providers utilize this single-proof withdrawal mechanism for cross-network transfers. Base attributed this improvement to Multiproofs enhancements delivered through the preceding Azul upgrade.

The upgrade further incorporates Reth V2 into Base’s node architecture. According to Base, this software implementation can cut node storage demands by as much as 50 percent. It additionally accommodates higher block gas limits, creating opportunities for expanded network throughput.

Recent Network Disruption Unrelated to Upgrade Postponement

Base encountered a block production halt lasting approximately two hours on June 25, prior to Beryl’s adjusted activation schedule. Engineering teams identified the cause as a consensus failure triggered by an invalid block entering the sequencing pipeline. Production subsequently resumed, and the team confirmed the incident bore no connection to the Beryl postponement.

The network emphasized that user assets remained secure throughout the disruption, despite the temporary cessation of block creation. Base founder Jesse Pollak stated that network interruptions are incompatible with infrastructure supporting worldwide financial operations. While the outage increased operational scrutiny, it didn’t affect Beryl’s planned functionality.

Advertisement

Beryl succeeds Azul, which deployed to mainnet in May as Base’s inaugural independent upgrade. The network has scheduled Cobalt, its subsequent major upgrade, for September. Cobalt is expected to deliver account abstraction capabilities, smart account support, gas sponsorship, transaction batching, and expanded B20 features.

 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto market clings to support as bitcoin hits 21-month low: Crypto Markets Today

Published

on

Crypto market clings to support as bitcoin hits 21-month low: Crypto Markets Today

The crypto market is clinging to a crucial level of support, with bitcoin barely moving since midnight UTC after rebounding from its lowest level since September 2024 on Thursday.

The largest cryptocurrency was recently trading near $59,700, having fallen as low as $58,100.

Ether (ETH) failed to mirror bitcoin’s bounce, dropping a further 1% and extending its string of declines to three straight days. It recently held around $1,550.

U.S. equities also start Friday indicating weakness, Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 futures are down by 1% and 0.4%, respectively, since midnight as the tech rally of the past three months continues to unwind.

Advertisement

One token that bucked the bearish market sentiment was aave , which added as much as 6.8% since midnight, building on a 17% gain over the past week after CoinDesk reported that crypto exchange Kraken was looking to acquire a 15% stake in the DeFi company.

Derivatives positioning

  • Market volatility continues to weigh on leveraged futures positions. Over the past 24 hours, another $1 billion in positions were liquidated, with long positions once again accounting for the majority. Notably, ETH saw more liquidations than BTC in the past 12 hours.
  • Bitcoin futures open interest (OI) rose for a second consecutive day to 778,000 BTC, a sharp increase from recent lows near 730,000 BTC. The open interest surged during Thursday’s late selloff, suggesting traders added shorts into the dip in anticipation of further downside.
  • The picture is different in ether futures, where open interest has remained stable near the 14 million ETH level since at least June 15. This is somewhat constructive, as it indicates traders are not aggressively shorting the price decline. A similar pattern holds for XRP.
  • Solana’s open interest has pulled back from record highs but remains elevated compared with recent months, pointing to the potential for continued volatility.
  • The OI-adjusted 24-hour cumulative volume delta continues to show bearish dominance across most of the top 25 cryptocurrencies, with the notable exceptions of BNB, SOL and TON. The negative reading suggests bears are more aggressive than bulls, favoring market orders over passive limit orders. This trend has persisted since Tuesday.
  • Annualized 30-day implied volatility indexes are signaling rising levels of concern. Bitcoin’s BVIV index jumped to 53% early today, its highest level since June 7 and a sharp rise from the June 16 low of 39%. ETH’s index climbed to 66%.
  • Wall Street’s equivalent, the VIX, has also risen to 20% from 15% recently but remains within the range seen since early April, indicating that equities are not yet in panic mode. A similar message is coming from the U.S. Treasury market’s implied volatility index, MOVE.
  • On Deribit, the one-week bitcoin options skew is approaching 30%, reflecting a substantial premium for puts, or defensive positions, over calls and underscoring strong downside fears. The one- and three-month skews are conveying a similar message.
  • Block flows included a large trade in the $53,000 put expiring July 10, along with demand for ether risk reversals.

Token talk

  • Aave outperformed the broader altcoin market, and an honorable mention goes to solana (SOL), which has added 2% since midnight and now trades around $68.95 after tumbling to $64.05 on Thursday.
  • AI tokens continue to unwind; RENDER, NEAR, FET and TAO lost between 1% and 1.5% on Friday, extending their declines.
  • Hyperliquid (HYPE) also fell, dropping 2.6%. It has now lost 18.5% since touching a record high 12 days ago.
  • Ethena (ENA) remains one of the worst-performing altcoins, losing another 5% on Friday. It’s now dropped 34% after touching the month’s high on June 3.
  • ENA’s plight can be attributed to the ongoing bear market, as a portion of the platform’s yield-generation strategy is tied to positive funding rates, which have now flipped negative.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025