Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Kelp Restaking Protocol Exploited, $293M Drained

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

DeFi markets faced another high-profile setback this weekend as Kelp, a liquid restaking protocol, disclosed a cyber attack targeting its rsETH restaking token. The incident prompted an immediate pause of rsETH smart contracts across Kelp’s mainnet and multiple Layer-2 networks as the project investigates potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in losses. Blockchain security firm Cyvers later pegged the damage at about $293 million, signaling a significant hit to users and counterparties tied to the restaking ecosystem.

Kelp stated on X that it detected suspicious cross-chain activity involving rsETH and subsequently halted rsETH contracts on mainnet and several Layer-2s to prevent further damage while the investigation unfolds. Cyvers added that the attacker exploited the rsETH adapter bridge—the software component that manages the rsETH token—allowing the drain of funds from the platform. The firm also noted that the attacker has been actively moving funds, with a substantial portion converted into Ethereum (ETH).

In the wake of the breach, the attacker’s on-chain activity has increasingly relied on a Tornado Cash mixer-funded address. Cyvers reported that roughly $250 million of the stolen funds had already been swapped into ETH, underscoring the challenge of tracing and recovering assets in the DeFi space once they leave the original contract domains.

Key takeaways

  • The Kelp rsETH attack reportedly drained about $293 million, triggering contract pauses across Kelp’s mainnet and several Layer-2 networks as investigators assess the damage.
  • The attacker targeted the rsETH adapter bridge, leveraging cross-chain dynamics that underscore risks inherent to DeFi composability and restaking ecosystems.
  • At least nine protocols with exposure to rsETH reportedly froze activity in response, while Aave moved to suspend rsETH markets on V3 and V4 to contain risk.
  • Approximately $250 million of the stolen funds have been converted to ETH, with the attacker utilizing a Tornado Cash mixer-funded address, complicating on-chain tracing efforts.

Attack details and ecosystem response

According to Kelp, the breach traces to irregular cross-chain activity linked to rsETH, prompting an immediate safety pause to contain potential further loss. The company’s moderation was swift, spanning mainnet and several Layer-2 deployments, as the team works through the incident. While Kelp is conducting its investigation, the broader DeFi community has begun to map the ripple effects beyond a single protocol.

Blockchain security firm Cyvers provided a stark figure for the loss, estimating the total at about $293 million. The firm’s analysis highlights the risk that bridges and adapters—components that enable tokens like rsETH to move across chains—present when vulnerabilities exist in the bridging layer. The incident aligns with a pattern of high-severity exploits aimed at cross-chain and interoperable DeFi primitives, where a single compromised bridge can force widespread disruption across multiple protocols.

Advertisement

In response to the breach, several DeFi platforms publicly paused or limited exposure to rsETH. Notably, Aave—one of the largest DeFi lenders—announced that rsETH markets had been frozen on its V3 and V4 deployments. Cyvers notes that at least nine protocols reportedly had exposure to rsETH and executed precautionary freezes or withdrawal restrictions as a precautionary measure to prevent cascading losses.

Analysts and observers have highlighted a core risk exposed by the incident: the compounding nature of DeFi’s composability. When multiple protocols rely on a shared token or bridge, a vulnerability in one hinge can reverberate across the entire network, forcing sudden risk management actions across an otherwise diversified ecosystem. Cyvers senior leadership emphasized to Cointelegraph that this is precisely the kind of incident that underscores the fragility and complexity of modern DeFi infrastructure when bridges and adapters are compromised.

Contextual backdrop: a string of cybersecurity incidents

The Kelp attack sits within a broader panorama of DeFi hacks observed over the past several months. In late April, Drift Protocol—a decentralized derivatives exchange—suffered a major exploit that drained roughly $280 million from the platform. Drift’s post-mortem described a months-long intrusion, noting the attackers’ alleged infiltration of developer machines and the eventual deployment of malware. The incident traced to a sophisticated operation that reportedly included access gained at a large crypto conference, followed by collaboration with the attackers before the breach unfolded.

Taken together, these events illuminate a persistent security challenge for the nascent DeFi stack: attackers are increasingly targeting the risk-prone layers of cross-chain interoperability and restaking mechanisms, where a single vulnerability can cascade into sizable losses across multiple protocols. Industry participants continue to debate the best path forward—ranging from more stringent bridge audit standards to enhanced multi-party computation (MPC) and formal verification for cross-chain components.

Advertisement

What this means for investors, users, and builders

For users and liquidity providers, the Kelp incident underscores the importance of understanding the specific risk profiles of restaking and cross-chain primitives. Restaking naturally introduces an expanded attack surface: while it offers potential yield enhancements, it also increases reliance on the security of adapter contracts and bridges that connect across layers of the ecosystem. Investors should monitor how protocols respond to such incidents, particularly regarding fund recovery efforts, contingency plans, and the timelines for resuming normal operations.

From a builder’s perspective, the episode highlights several priorities: rigorous security testing of bridge and adapter code, heightened monitoring for cross-chain anomalies, and clearer disclosure frameworks around incident response. The drift toward rapid, publicized pauses—while essential for risk containment—also presses for standardized playbooks so that platforms can coordinate responses without sacrificing user trust.

Regulators and policymakers may also take note of the evolving security landscape, especially as DeFi protocols broaden their engagement with restaking mechanisms and more intricate cross-chain flows. The balance between innovation and resilience will likely shape ongoing discussions around security best practices and capital-adequacy considerations for DeFi incumbents as they scale.

Closing perspective

As the Kelp investigation unfolds, observers will be watching for a clearer accounting of the breach’s root causes, the effectiveness of the emergency pauses, and any progress toward asset recovery. The incident, along with Drift’s earlier breach, reinforces a central theme for the crypto markets: cross-chain and restaking infrastructures demand heightened scrutiny, robust security postures, and coordinated risk management across the ecosystem. Readers should stay tuned for updates on Kelp’s findings, the status of rsETH across major platforms, and any new measures aimed at hardening DeFi’s interconnected layers.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Nasdaq Rally Extends to 13 Days as Call Options Volume Nears Record High Levels

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Nasdaq call options volume hits 3.9 million daily, nearing its highest level ever recorded
  • Bullish options activity has surged sharply, with volumes rising more than fourfold since 2021
  • The Nasdaq posts a 13-day winning streak, marking its longest run of gains since 2013
  • The index climbs 17.7% during the streak, ranking among top short-term returns in 20 years

US technology stocks continue a strong upward run, supported by rising options activity and sustained market momentum. Recent data shows increasing bullish positioning, while the Nasdaq records one of its longest positive streaks in over a decade.

Rising Options Activity Signals Strong Market Positioning

Recent market data points to a sharp increase in bullish bets on US technology stocks. Nasdaq call options volume has reached 3.9 million contracts per day. This marks the second-highest level ever recorded.

A tweet from The Kobeissi Letter reports that this figure trails only the November 2025 level. During that period, volumes approached 4.3 million contracts per day. The post also notes that current activity reflects a broader rise in market participation.

The volume growth has been steady over recent years. Since 2021, Nasdaq call options volume has more than quadrupled. This rise shows a clear shift toward active trading in the tech sector.

At the same time, the increase in call options signals stronger interest in upward price movement. Traders often use these contracts to position for gains. However, the data reflects positioning rather than future direction.

Advertisement

Moreover, the rising volume aligns with broader trends in equity markets. It shows that participation has expanded as prices move higher. This pattern often appears during extended rallies.

Nasdaq Extends Winning Streak With Strong Returns

Alongside increased options activity, the Nasdaq has posted consistent gains. The index has now closed higher for 13 straight sessions. This marks the longest positive streak since 2013.

During this period, the Nasdaq has risen by 17.7%. This performance ranks among the strongest 13-day returns in the past two decades. The sustained climb has drawn attention across financial markets.

The rally reflects continued buying interest in technology stocks. It also aligns with the surge in call options activity reported earlier. Together, these trends show a period of strong market momentum.

Advertisement

The Kobeissi Letter notes that such a streak is rare. Extended runs like this often stand out in historical data. However, they do not appear frequently in modern trading cycles.

As the Nasdaq continues its upward movement, traders remain focused on short-term price action. At the same time, the sharp rise in options activity signals market participation. This combination shapes current trading conditions.

The ongoing rally places US technology stocks in a notable position. Market data continues to track both price movement and trading behavior. These figures offer a clear snapshot of current market dynamics without projecting future direction.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin STH SOPR Nears 1.0 as Short-Term Holders Face Critical Market Decision

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Bitcoin’s STH SOPR is nearing 1.0, placing short-term holders at a key decision point between selling or holding.
  • Historical patterns show repeated SOPR tests near 1.0 often occur before a sustained market trend shift emerges.
  • A successful reclaim above 1.0 may support continued upside, while rejection could extend consolidation.
  • Recent price recovery has brought SOPR back to break-even, reflecting shifting sentiment among recent buyers.

Bitcoin’s short-term holder behavior is approaching a critical threshold as the STH SOPR nears the 1.0 level. After a 26% recovery from early February lows, market participants now face a decisive moment that could shape near-term price direction.

STH SOPR Approaches Break-Even as Market Tests Direction

Recent data shared by analyst Darkfost shows the STH SOPR hovering near 0.998, just below break-even. This level reflects whether short-term holders are selling at a profit or loss. A move above 1.0 signals profit-taking, while values below indicate losses.

The chart tracks Bitcoin’s price alongside the STH SOPR and its 30-day moving average from 2021 to early 2026. It shows how short-term holder behavior has aligned with major market phases. At present, the indicator sits at a level that often leads to strong reactions.

According to the analysis, short-term holders now face two clear choices. They can exit positions at break-even after months of pressure, or they can continue holding in anticipation of gains. This behavior tends to influence liquidity and short-term volatility.

Past cycles show that reclaiming the 1.0 level often supports upward continuation. However, repeated rejections at this level can extend consolidation or trigger further downside. The latest recovery has brought the indicator back to this pivot zone once again.

Historical Patterns Show Repeated Tests Before Trend Reversal

The broader trend from 2021 to 2022 reflects a distribution phase followed by a bear market. During that period, the STH SOPR dropped below 1.0 as prices declined, showing consistent loss realization among short-term holders.

Advertisement

As Bitcoin moved into 2022 and early 2023, the indicator struggled to reclaim 1.0. Multiple failed attempts marked a period where weaker participants exited positions. This phase aligned with price consolidation between $16,000 and $25,000.

The recovery phase in 2023 shifted this pattern. The STH SOPR moved above 1.0 and held that level consistently. At the same time, Bitcoin climbed toward $45,000, showing renewed strength and steady profit-taking without disrupting the trend.

During the expansion phase between 2024 and 2025, the indicator frequently moved above 1.03. Pullbacks found support near 1.0, while prices pushed toward $100,000. This structure reflected strong demand and continuous absorption of selling pressure.

The recent correction from late 2025 into early 2026 has changed this dynamic. The STH SOPR dropped below 1.0 again, reaching levels near 0.98. This shift shows that short-term holders have returned to selling at a loss during the pullback.

Advertisement

The current rebound toward 1.0 places the market at a familiar decision point. Historical patterns show that several attempts may occur before a clear direction forms. Previous cycles recorded multiple tests before a sustained reversal took hold.

If the indicator moves above 1.0 and holds, it may support a renewed upward trend. On the other hand, failure to reclaim this level could extend the current range or lead to further downside pressure.

For now, the STH SOPR continues to act as a key measure of short-term sentiment. Its position near break-even reflects a market that remains undecided, with price action likely to follow the behavior of recent buyers.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Reclaims Fourth in Crypto Rankings After Flipping BNB: Is Ethereum Within Reach?

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

    • XRP reclaimed fourth place in global crypto rankings with a market cap of around $91 billion.
    • The SEC and CFTC jointly classified XRP as a digital commodity on March 17, boosting trading volume 250%.
    • Only 16% of XRP ETF assets come from institutions, leaving significant room for larger capital inflows.
    • XRP would need to reach roughly $4.79 per token to match Ethereum’s current $295 billion market cap.

XRP price has reclaimed fourth place in global crypto rankings, overtaking BNB with a market cap near $91 billion. The two assets have swapped positions multiple times since March 2026.

XRP trades around $1.50 as of writing, following a 10% rally. Ethereum holds a much larger market cap of roughly $295 billion. Three key developments, however, could close that gap considerably in the months ahead.

The Structural Shift Behind XRP’s Rise Over BNB

For much of the past three years, XRP and BNB have exchanged the fourth-place ranking repeatedly. XRP grabbed it in early 2025, lost it, then reclaimed it in July at a cycle high of $3.65. The token slid back as the broader market corrected through late 2025 and into early 2026.

The March 2026 flip carried more weight than previous ones. On March 17, the SEC and CFTC jointly classified XRP as a digital commodity. Banks and asset managers that had previously avoided XRP over securities concerns could now hold and trade it freely.

XRP spiked to $1.60 that day, with trading volume surging roughly 250%. The rally faded after the Fed held rates and raised its inflation forecast. BNB briefly reclaimed fourth on March 23 before XRP pulled ahead once again.

Advertisement

Three Catalysts That Could Drive XRP Higher

The CLARITY Act remains the most closely watched catalyst for XRP price. It cleared the House in July 2025 and is targeting a Senate Banking Committee markup in late April. Unlike March’s regulatory guidance, the CLARITY Act would permanently cement XRP’s commodity classification.

XRP ETFs represent another growing driver in the market. Currently, six XRP ETFs operate in the U.S., with retail investors holding about 84% of assets. Institutions account for only 16%, leaving substantial room for larger inflows as legal certainty grows.

Real-world adoption through Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity service adds consistent organic buying pressure. ODL uses XRP to settle cross-border payments in seconds without pre-funded destination accounts.

Expanding ODL corridors throughout 2025 and 2026 have steadily built a foundation of transaction-driven demand.

Advertisement

What XRP Realistically Needs to Reach Ethereum’s Level

XRP at $1.50 carries a market cap of about $91 billion, compared to Ethereum’s $295 billion. Matching Ethereum’s current valuation would require XRP to reach approximately $4.79 per token. That translates to a 219% move from where it trades today.

A more achievable target for 2026 is a range between $3.00 and $4.00. That range would roughly double XRP’s market cap, placing it about halfway toward Ethereum’s current standing. Getting there still requires the CLARITY Act to pass and macro conditions to stabilize.

Flipping Ethereum this year would need nearly every catalyst aligning at once. A legislative win, a macro recovery, and accelerating ETF inflows would all have to converge simultaneously. That combination is not impossible, but remains a considerable stretch within a single calendar year.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SEC Charges Bitcoin Latinum Founder Donald Basile With $16 Million Investor Fraud

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • The SEC charged Donald Basile and two companies over a fraudulent $16 million Bitcoin Latinum SAFT offering.
  • Basile falsely claimed LTNM was the world’s first insured digital asset with up to $1 billion in coverage.
  • Millions in investor funds were allegedly misused for real estate, credit card bills, and a $160,000 horse.
  • The SEC is seeking disgorgement, civil penalties, permanent injunctions, and an officer-and-director bar against Basile.

Bitcoin Latinum founder Donald G. Basile now faces federal fraud charges from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The SEC claims Basile and his two companies raised $16 million from hundreds of American investors through fraudulent crypto offerings.

Regulators filed the complaint on April 17, 2026, in the Eastern District of New York. The charges center on false claims about insurance, asset backing, and the intended use of investor funds.

Alleged Misrepresentations Behind the Bitcoin Latinum Offering

The case revolves around the sale of Simple Agreements for Future Tokens, or SAFTs. These instruments promised investors the right to receive a crypto asset known as Bitcoin Latinum, or LTNM.

Basile conducted the offering through GIBF GP, Inc. and Monsoon Blockchain Corporation. The campaign launched in 2020 and attracted hundreds of investors across the United States.

Advertisement

According to the SEC, Basile repeatedly told investors that LTNM “is the world’s first insured digital asset” with “up to $1 billion coverage.”

He made these claims both directly to investors and through his two companies. Regulators say no insurance company ever issued such a policy. No coverage was ever in place for LTNM or any part of the SAFT offering.

The complaint further alleges that Basile told investors LTNM “is an asset-backed cryptocurrency.” He also claimed that an “existing trust” secured the token’s value on behalf of investors.

However, regulators say no such trust or asset pool was ever created. These representations were made to give the project a false sense of legitimacy.

Advertisement

Beyond that, Basile allegedly promised that 80% or more of proceeds would be “used to support the underlying value” of LTNM or would go “into an underlying fund.”

Instead, he reportedly used millions for personal expenses, including real estate purchases and credit card payments. He also allegedly bought a $160,000 horse using investor funds. The token later became worthless, leaving investors across the country with major losses.

Charges Filed and Legal Remedies Sought Against Basile

The SEC charged Basile under Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 for anti-fraud violations. The complaint also cites Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.

GIBF and Monsoon face charges under Section 17(a)(2) and related exchange act provisions. The SEC further charges Basile with aiding and abetting the violations of both companies.

Advertisement

As a result, the regulator is seeking permanent injunctive relief against all three defendants. Disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest forms part of the requested remedies.

Civil penalties are also being sought to address the alleged misconduct by Basile and his entities. A conduct-based injunction would additionally bar defendants from future securities activities.

The SEC is pursuing an officer-and-director bar specifically targeting Basile. This bar would prevent him from serving in any leadership role at a public company.

Litigation is being led by Brockett, Flath, and Rodriguez from the SEC’s New York Regional Office. Supervision of the case falls under Jack Kaufman of the same office.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Price Waits for Buyers as SuperTrend Flips Bullish and Liquidity Holds Steady

Published

on

XRP Price Waits for Buyers as SuperTrend Flips Bullish and Liquidity Holds Steady

TLDR:

  • XRP’s SuperTrend indicator flipped bullish on the daily chart for the first time since January 17, 2025.
  • Transfers above 100K and 1M XRP show periodic spikes but lack consistency, signaling no clear whale direction.
  • No strong correlation exists between XRP inflows and price, pointing to balanced liquidity absorbing supply.
  • A daily close above $1.55 resistance could trigger a relief rally toward the primary target zone of $1.90.

XRP price is drawing attention as fresh technical and on-chain data point toward a potential trend reversal. At $1.43, the asset’s SuperTrend indicator has flipped bullish on the daily chart for the first time since January 17.

Meanwhile, on-chain transfer data shows balanced liquidity conditions across the market. Analysts are now watching key resistance levels closely.

The broader setup suggests that a sustained push from spot buyers could trigger a sharp upward move in price.

On-Chain Data Points to Balanced Liquidity Across XRP Market

Retail activity remains visible in the XRP network, particularly through transfers in the 10,000 to 100,000 XRP range.

Source: Cryptoquant

Advertisement

However, this type of inflow primarily generates trading volume rather than direct price movement. Transfers at this scale carry a neutral effect on price direction overall.

Larger transfers, those above 100,000 and one million XRP, have shown periodic spikes in activity. Yet the pattern remains inconsistent, meaning whale participants are not applying steady directional pressure. The market, as a result, lacks a clear dominant force at the upper transfer tiers.

Notably, there is no reliable correlation between inflow volume and price movement in either direction. When inflows rise, the price does not automatically fall. When inflows slow, the price does not automatically climb either.

This pattern suggests that incoming coins are not all being sold into the market at once. Sufficient liquidity appears to be absorbing available supply.

Advertisement

Based on this data, the main price drivers are likely derivatives market activity and the broader market trend rather than spot inflows.

SuperTrend Flip Puts XRP Resistance Level of $1.55 in Focus

Crypto analyst Ali Charts noted on social media that XRP’s SuperTrend indicator has turned bullish on the daily chart.

This is the first such signal since January 17, ending an extended period of sell pressure across the chart. The shift marks a notable change in short-term trend structure for the asset.

The real test, however, remains at the $1.55 resistance level. That price zone has repeatedly capped upward movement in recent weeks. A clean daily close above $1.55 would likely open the door to a broader relief rally.

With the SuperTrend now acting as a trailing support floor, the primary target for any sustained move sits at the $1.90 zone. Traders are watching that level as the next meaningful objective should buying pressure increase.

Advertisement

On-chain conditions currently show no strong selling pressure in the market. Liquidity remains stable, and inflows alone are not dominating price action. If spot buying strengthens from here, XRP could move sharply higher in the near term.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Kelp Hacked, Losses Climb to $293M As Other Protocols Impacted

Published

on

Cybercrime, Cybersecurity, Scams, Hacks

Kelp, a liquid restaking protocol, was the victim of a cyber attack on Saturday, causing the platform to pause smart contracts for its restaking token (rsETH), as it “investigates” the attack amid reports of hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.

“Earlier today, we identified suspicious cross-chain activity involving rsETH. We have paused rsETH contracts across mainnet and several Layer-2s,” the Kelp platform said in an X post.

The attacker exploited the rsETH adapter bridge contract, the software code that manages Kelp’s rsETH token, and drained the platform of about $293 million in funds, according to blockchain security firm Cyvers.

Cybercrime, Cybersecurity, Scams, Hacks
Source: Cyvers

The attacker used a Tornado Cash crypto mixer-funded address and has already converted about $250 million of the stolen funds to Ether (ETH), the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum layer-1 blockchain network, Cyvers told Cointelegraph.

In response to the attack, decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Aave announced it had frozen rsETH markets on Aave V3 and V4. At least nine crypto protocols had exposure to the token and have frozen activity on their platforms in response, Cyvers said.

Advertisement
Cybercrime, Cybersecurity, Scams, Hacks
Source: Aave

“This is exactly the kind of incident that highlights the risks of composability in DeFi,” Deddy Lavid, CEO of Cyvers, told Cointelegraph. Cointelegraph reached out to Kelp but did not obtain a response by the time of publication. 

The incident is the latest in a string of cybersecurity hacks and exploits of crypto platforms over the last several months, as crypto losses from hacks and scams totaled about $482 million in Q1 2026.

Related: Fake Ledger Live app on Apple App Store drained $9.5M from victims: ZachXBT

Drift Protocol hacked for $280 million

Decentralized cryptocurrency exchange Drift Protocol also suffered an exploit in April, which drained the platform of about $280 million.

The Drift Protocol team said the attack took “months of deliberate preparation,” in which the team was infiltrated by suspected North Korean state-affiliated hackers.

Advertisement

In a post-mortem update, the Drift team said they met the attackers at a “major” crypto conference and collaborated with them for several months before the attackers deployed malware on developer machines and compromised the platform. 

Magazine: DeFi’s billion-dollar secret: The insiders responsible for hacks