Crypto World
Labor Market and Housing Data Raise New Fears of a U.S. Economic Slowdown
TLDR:
- Layoffs and declining job openings show employers preparing for slower growth and tighter financial conditions
- Housing demand is weakening as sellers outnumber buyers, creating a record imbalance and reduced market liquidity
- Bond and credit markets reflect rising stress tied to debt levels and long-term growth uncertainty
- Rapid disinflation and firm monetary policy increase the risks of tightening into an already fragile economy
U.S. economic indicators are showing coordinated signs of strain across labor, housing, and credit markets. Layoffs are rising while hiring slows, reducing job security for many workers.
Housing demand is weakening as sellers outnumber buyers. Bond and credit markets also reflect growing caution. Together, these trends suggest the economy is entering a fragile late-cycle phase.
Labor and Housing Data Point to Late-Cycle Fragility
Labor and housing data are moving together in a pattern associated with late-cycle slowdowns. January layoff announcements exceeded one hundred thousand, the highest level for that month since the global financial crisis.
Weekly jobless claims have trended higher, while job openings have fallen to levels last seen in 2020. This combination reduces worker mobility and weakens income security across sectors.
Companies are not only cutting staff but also limiting recruitment, with hiring plans reaching record lows for the month. Consumer confidence surveys now reflect growing caution toward discretionary spending and long-term purchases.
Housing markets mirror this shift in behavior. Sellers outnumber buyers by a wide margin, creating the largest recorded gap between supply and demand participants.
Elevated mortgage rates continue to restrict affordability, while existing owners hesitate to reduce prices because of low-rate loans locked in earlier years. Listings remain visible, yet transactions slow as liquidity dries up.
This imbalance delays price discovery and increases carrying costs for households and developers.
Employment weakness directly affects housing demand. Fewer stable incomes mean fewer qualified buyers, placing additional pressure on inventories struggling to clear.
Together, labor deterioration and housing imbalance suggest that economic momentum is being supported by inertia rather than expanding demand, a condition that historically precedes slowdowns across consumption-driven industries.
Bond, Credit, and Inflation Signals Reinforce Economic Stress
Financial markets are reflecting stress through bond and credit indicators. The Treasury yield curve has entered bear steepening, where long-term yields rise faster than short-term rates.
Investors demand higher compensation to hold extended maturity debt, signaling concern over fiscal deficits and long-term growth expectations. Similar curve movements have preceded economic contractions in previous cycles.
Corporate credit conditions show parallel weakness. A rising share of lower-quality bonds now trades at distressed levels or faces elevated default risk.
When financing tightens, firms cut costs, postpone investment, and reduce payroll. These actions feed back into employment and consumer demand, reinforcing pressure already visible in labor data.
Business bankruptcy filings continue to trend upward, reducing liquidity within supply chains and tightening lending standards across financial institutions. Inflation readings have shifted quickly, with real-time measures pointing toward levels near one percent.
Rapid disinflation increases the risk that consumers delay spending in anticipation of lower prices, slowing transaction activity across goods and services markets.
Monetary policy remains focused on inflation control despite weakening forward indicators in labor and housing. A restrictive stance during slowing growth raises the probability of misalignment between financial conditions and economic capacity.
Combined with credit strain and yield curve signals, the environment reflects fragility rather than expansion.
Crypto World
Marathon Digital moves $87m in BTC as crypto markets slide
Marathon Digital Holdings, one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies, has recently executed a significant on-chain movement of Bitcoin worth roughly $87 million amid a broader sell-off in crypto markets.
Summary
- Marathon Digital moved 1,318 BTC worth about $87 million over a 10-hour period, with funds sent to institutional counterparties, custodial wallets, and a newly created address, according to Arkham data.
- The transfers came amid a sharp pullback in Bitcoin prices, which briefly dipped toward $60,000, increasing pressure on bitcoin miners.
- The on-chain activity coincided with a nearly 19% drop in MARA shares in a single Nasdaq session, adding to investor unease across the mining sector.
The activity, captured by on-chain analytics firm Arkham, coincided with a sharp drop in Bitcoin’s (BTC) price and a steep decline in MARA’s stock.
Large BTC transfers spark market speculation
Over a roughly 10-hour period, Marathon Digital moved 1,318 BTC, valued at approximately $86.9 million at the time of transfer, from miner wallets to a mix of trading desks, custodial services, and other wallet addresses.
According to Arkham data, the largest transfer involved 653.773 BTC, worth about $42 million, sent to an address associated with institutional services provider Two Prime. Additional transfers included 200 BTC and 99.999 BTC to wallets linked to BitGo, totaling roughly $20.4 million.
Another 305 BTC, valued at about $20.7 million, was moved to a newly created wallet whose ownership remains unknown.

These on-chain moves drew attention because such large BTC movements during a market downturn are often interpreted as potential precursor actions to sales, hedging, or collateral posting.
The timing of the transfers came amid notable weakness in Bitcoin prices, which briefly dipped toward the $60,000 range before trading in the mid-$60,000s.
The on-chain activity also added to investor unease as Marathon Digital’s shares plunged. MARA stock fell nearly 19% in a single session on Nasdaq amid mounting pressure on bitcoin miners.
Though large transfers from miner wallets often trigger speculation, they don’t necessarily equate to immediate spot sales on exchanges. Institutional counterparties, lending arrangements, and collateralized trading strategies can all require BTC movements without marking direct liquidation.
Crypto World
Bitcoin investors face ‘harvest now, decrypt later’ quantum threat
IBIT’s heavy Bitcoin flows and rising institutional demand collide with growing “harvest now, decrypt later” fears and BMIC’s push for post-quantum wallet security.
Summary
- BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust now holds about 764,893 BTC, or roughly 3.64% of the eventual 21 million supply, intensifying focus on centralization and key management.
- Security researchers warn of “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks, where adversaries stockpile today’s encrypted blockchain data for future quantum decryption once ECC is broken.
- BMIC’s presale pitches a “Quantum Meta-Cloud” with ERC‑4337 smart accounts and signature‑hiding wallets that keep public keys off‑chain to mitigate future quantum attacks.
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust recorded substantial daily trading volume, according to Nasdaq data, as digital asset security concerns related to quantum computing threats gain attention among institutional investors.
The trading volume spike occurred without a corresponding price decline, a pattern market analysts characterize as a transfer of holdings from retail investors to institutional buyers, according to industry observers. The development suggests Bitcoin’s evolving role in institutional portfolios as a macro hedge asset.
The concentration of digital asset wealth through centralized issuers has raised concerns about vulnerabilities in current cryptographic standards. Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), the encryption method protecting most cryptocurrency assets, faces potential obsolescence with advances in quantum computing technology, according to cybersecurity experts.
Security researchers have identified a threat vector known as “harvest now, decrypt later,” in which encrypted data is collected for future decryption once quantum computing capabilities mature. Nation-state actors are reportedly employing this strategy, according to cybersecurity analysts.
BMIC, a blockchain security project, has positioned itself to address quantum computing threats to cryptocurrency holdings. The project has raised undisclosed funds during its presale phase, according to company announcements.
The protocol utilizes what the company describes as a “Quantum Meta-Cloud” and AI-enhanced threat detection systems designed to prevent public key exposure during transactions. Traditional cryptocurrency wallets reveal public keys when transactions are signed, creating potential vulnerabilities to future quantum algorithms, according to the project’s technical documentation.
BMIC’s architecture incorporates ERC-4337 Smart Accounts, a wallet standard that eliminates seed phrase requirements while implementing quantum-resistant cryptographic methods, according to the company. The platform offers quantum-secure staking options designed to generate yield without exposing private keys to network participants.
The project’s early funding stage has attracted capital from investors focused on blockchain infrastructure security, according to industry reports. Market observers note a growing focus on post-quantum cryptographic solutions as digital asset valuations increase.
Bitcoin’s market capitalization has reached approximately one trillion dollars, protected by cryptographic standards developed before quantum computing emerged as a practical threat. Protocols offering migration paths to post-quantum security standards may command market premiums as institutional adoption increases, according to blockchain analysts.
The cryptocurrency industry faces pressure to upgrade security infrastructure as quantum computing technology advances. Traditional encryption methods protecting blockchain assets may require replacement with quantum-resistant alternatives within the coming decade, according to estimates from technology researchers.
Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks, and presale investments involve additional uncertainties. Investors should conduct independent research before making investment decisions.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Core maintainers face shake-up as Gloria Zhao revokes PGP key
Bitcoin Core maintainer Gloria Zhao has revoked her signing PGP key and stepped down, ending a six-year run of mempool-focused work that reshaped transaction policy.
Summary
- Zhao confirmed on GitHub on Feb. 5 that she revoked her maintainer PGP key, formally ending her role signing Bitcoin Core releases.
- She became the first known woman Bitcoin Core maintainer in July 2022, when her key was added to the trusted-keys file alongside Pieter Wuille’s departure.
- Backed by Brink, the Human Rights Foundation and Spiral, she specialized in mempool policy, package relay (BIP 331), TRUC (BIP 431), RBF, and P2P improvements over more than six years of contributions.
Gloria Zhao has revoked her signing PGP key for Bitcoin Core, confirming her departure from the maintainer role, according to an announcement posted on her GitHub profile on February 5.
Bitcoin Core maintainers are responsible for reviewing and approving code updates and digitally signing official releases with cryptographic keys.
Zhao joined Brink, a non-profit organization supported by the Human Rights Foundation and Spiral, in January 2021. Her PGP key was added to Bitcoin Core’s trusted-keys file on July 7, 2022, making her a maintainer coinciding with Pieter Wuille’s departure. She was the first known woman in this role, appointed by community consensus, according to Bitcoin Core records.
Zhao specialized in mempool policy, transaction relay, and fee estimation. Her work included package relay (BIP 331), TRUC (BIP 431), RBF, and peer-to-peer protocol improvements designed to reduce inefficiencies and censorship vectors. She contributed hundreds of commits to Bitcoin Core, including pull request reviews and participation in the Bitcoin Core PR Review Club.
Zhao began contributing to Bitcoin Core in 2020. As of August 2025, she had made 837 contributions in the past year across Bitcoin/bitcoin and related repositories, according to GitHub data. In January 2025, Brink announced it was celebrating her four years of full-time work on Bitcoin Core.
Crypto World
Bitcoin traders face possible 70% drawdown with $38k target in play
An analyst warns Bitcoin could revisit ~$38k if past 70% drawdown patterns repeat, while others argue deeper institutional flows may cap the correction nearer 55%–60%.
Summary
- Analyst “Sherlock” maps past drawdowns of 93%, 86%, 84%, and 77% to project a roughly 70% drop this cycle, implying a Bitcoin bottom near $38,000.
- Critics on X counter that prior top‑to‑bottom moves versus bottom‑to‑top rallies suggest a shallower 55%–60% correction, arguing institutions could soften the downside.
- Sherlock replies that reflexivity can cut both ways, warning traders that trying to time a perfect bottom is risky as Bitcoin trades back to October 2024 levels.
Bitcoin (BTC) continued to trade under bearish pressure as analysts debate the potential depth of the current correction, with one market observer projecting the cryptocurrency could fall to $38,000 based on historical drawdown patterns.
Bitcoin could fall to the $38k range: analyst
The cryptocurrency has broken below key support levels and extended its decline as part of a corrective phase that began after Bitcoin reached its peak in October 2025, according to market data.
A crypto analyst known as Sherlock posted an analysis on social media platform X examining Bitcoin’s historical bear market drawdowns and their progression over time. The analysis noted that Bitcoin’s 2011 cycle experienced a drawdown of approximately 93% from peak to trough, representing the largest correction in the asset’s history to date.
Subsequent bear markets showed progressively smaller declines, according to the data cited. The 2015 cycle saw a drawdown of about 86%, followed by 84% in 2018 and approximately 77% during the 2022 bear market.
The analyst projected that if this pattern continues, the current cycle could see a drawdown of around 70% from the all-time high, which would place Bitcoin’s bottom near $38,000.
The projection generated significant engagement on X, with some market participants suggesting that increased institutional involvement and market reflexivity could limit downside risk. One response argued that when comparing prior bottom-to-top moves against top-to-bottom declines, the next drawdown should be closer to 55% or 60% rather than 70%.
Sherlock responded that reflexivity can amplify downside moves as well as rallies, cautioning traders against attempting to time purchases at specific bottom targets.
Bitcoin was trading at levels not seen since October 2024, according to data from CoinGecko. The cryptocurrency last traded around current price levels in October 2023, during the early stages of the previous bull market.
The asset has rebounded from an intraday low but remains under pressure as market participants assess whether the corrective phase has concluded.
Crypto World
“It’ll Get Worse. It’ll Get Redder.”
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson sought to steady market sentiment during a sharp crypto sell-off, arguing that short-term price pain does not undermine the long-term case for blockchain-based financial systems.
Summary
- Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson warned that crypto markets could face further losses, telling viewers, “It’ll get worse. It’ll get redder,” as digital assets extended a broad sell-off.
- Hoskinson said he has personally lost more than $3 billion during past market cycles, arguing that his commitment to blockchain development is driven by conviction rather than profit.
- He said Cardano is entering a commercialization phase, citing full decentralization, completed governance upgrades, and upcoming initiatives such as Hydra and privacy-focused project Midnight.
Speaking during a public livestream from Tokyo, Hoskinson acknowledged worsening market conditions and warned that further volatility could lie ahead. “It’ll get worse. It’ll get redder,” he said, urging developers and investors to focus on building rather than retreating.
“I’ve lost over $3 billion”
Addressing criticism that crypto founders are insulated from downturns, Hoskinson said he has personally absorbed substantial financial losses over the years, estimating them at more than $3 billion.
“I’ve lost more money than anyone listening to this,” he said, adding that he could have exited the industry long ago but chose to remain involved out of principle rather than financial incentive.
Hoskinson emphasized that his continued participation in the sector is driven by conviction rather than profit, arguing that integrity and long-term vision matter more than short-term market cycles.
Cardano ready for commercialization
Hoskinson said Cardano (ADA) has reached a point where years of infrastructure development are beginning to translate into real-world use cases. According to him, the network is now fully decentralized, with governance mechanisms largely in place.
“The infrastructure is strong. We’re ready for commercialization,” Hoskinson said.
He highlighted Hydra, Cardano’s layer-2 scaling solution, as well as privacy-focused initiatives such as Midnight and StarStream, positioning them as key components of the ecosystem’s next phase. These projects are aimed at improving throughput, enhancing data protection, and supporting applications beyond speculative trading.
Crypto as a global economic tool
The Cardano founder also broadened his remarks to include a critique of existing financial and political systems, arguing that global economic coordination is becoming increasingly difficult under traditional frameworks.
“The only way to run a world like this is through a cryptocurrency,” Hoskinson said, contending that blockchains provide rule-based systems that reduce reliance on centralized authorities in a more interconnected global economy.
He framed blockchain adoption as a response to structural shifts driven by artificial intelligence, demographic change, and declining trust in institutions.
Looking beyond the downturn
Hoskinson closed the livestream by urging the crypto community to maintain long-term focus despite ongoing volatility. He stressed that progress should not be judged solely by token prices or short-term sentiment.
“I’ll be with you on the red days and the green days,” he said. “I ain’t going anywhere.”
Crypto World
Ripple ETF Investors Unfazed by Market Crash as XRP Price Begins Recovery
XRP went through some intense volatility but was stopped at $1.54 during its recoveyr attempt.
Unlike investors who use the spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs to gain exposure to the two market leaders, those opting for the XRP funds seemed unfazed by the latest crypto crash.
Data from SoSoValue shows that the past week ended well in the green for the Ripple ETFs, even though the underlying asset’s price went through some of its darkest periods.
XRP ETFs Keep Gaining
Recall that the previous business week ended in the red for the XRP funds because of a single trading day – January 29, when investors pulled out nearly $93 million, making it the worst performance in terms of net flows since the products’ inception. The data on Monday shows a minor outflow of just over $400,000, which was rather negligible given the fact that the entire market crumbled once again during that weekend.
However, XRP ETF investors began putting funds back into the financial vehicles, with $19.46 million on Tuesday, $4.83 million on Wednesday, and $15.16 million on Friday, according to SoSoValue. For some reason, the monitoring resource has not updated the data for Thursday, but other websites and reports still show a minor net inflow.
Additionally, the cumulative net inflows for the spot XRP ETFs have grown from $1.18 billion at the end of the previous business week to $1.22 billion as of February 6, showing a net gain of around $40 million.
The spot ETH ETFs bled out around $170 million, while the BTC counterparties are down by $358 million within the same timeframe.
XRP Price Goes Nuts
The past week or so has been nothing short of a wild rollercoaster ride for the entire crypto market, but Ripple’s cross-border token was at the forefront. Last Saturday, it crashed from $1.75 to $1.50, which was already bad enough given the fact that it traded at $2.40 on January 6.
You may also like:
However, the bears were not done yet as they initiated a few consecutive leg downs, culminating in a massive plunge to $1.11 (on Bitstamp) on Friday morning. This meant that XRP had dumped by over 50% in just a month.
However, then came the big bounce as some metrics suggested so. In a matter of mere hours, the asset skyrocketed by 40% to $1.54, where it was rejected again and now struggles to remain above $1.40. The data above clearly shows that ETF investors are not to blame for these wild swings, at least not in XRP’s case.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).
Crypto World
BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Posts $231.6M Inflows After Turbulent Week For BTC
BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) saw $231.6 million in inflows on Friday, following two days of heavy outflows during a turbulent week for Bitcoin.
The iShares Bitcoin (BTC) Trust ETF (IBIT) saw $548.7 million in total outflows on Wednesday and Thursday as crypto market sentiment declined to record-low levels, with Bitcoin’s price briefly dropping to $60,000 on Thursday, according to Farside.
Preliminary Farside data show inflows across nine US-based spot Bitcoin ETF products totaling $330.7 million, following three days of collective outflows totaling $1.25 billion.
Bitcoin ETF flows reveal investor sentiment
So far in 2026, IBIT has posted just 11 trading days of net inflows.
Bitcoin holders and crypto market participants closely watch Bitcoin ETF flows for clues about where the price is headed and whether interest in the asset is rising.

It comes as Bitcoin’s price has fallen 24.30% over the past 30 days, with Bitcoin trading at $69,820 at the time of publication, according to CoinMarketCap.
On Thursday, the IBIT “crushed its daily volume record,” with $10 billion worth of shares trading hands, according to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas.
IBIT rebounds on Friday after price plunge
Balchunas added that IBIT dropped 13% on the day, its “second-worst daily price drop since it launched,” with its largest daily price decline at 15% on May 8, 2024.

However, the IBIT rebounded 9.92% on Friday, closing at $39.68, according to Google Finance.
Related: Google search volume for ‘Bitcoin’ skyrockets amid BTC price swings
ETF analyst James Seyffart noted on Wednesday that while Bitcoin ETF holders are facing their “biggest losses” since the US products launched in January 2024 — paper losses of around 42% with Bitcoin below $73,000 — the recent outflows still pale compared with the inflows seen at the market’s peak.
Before the October downturn, spot Bitcoin ETF net inflows were around $62.11 billion. They’ve now fallen to about $55 billion.
Magazine: Bitcoin’s ‘biggest bull catalyst’ would be Saylor’s liquidation: Santiment founder
Crypto World
China Bans Unapproved Yuan-Pegged Stablecoins Abroad to Protect Currency Stability
Chinese regulators have moved to tighten control over digital assets, banning the unauthorized issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins overseas and extending restrictions to tokenized real-world assets linked to the country’s currency.
Key Takeaways:
- China banned unauthorized yuan-pegged stablecoins and related tokenized assets to protect monetary sovereignty.
- Authorities reaffirmed crypto payment prohibitions while promoting the state-backed digital yuan.
- Japan and Hong Kong are moving toward regulated stablecoin markets, highlighting a regional policy divide.
In a joint statement released Friday, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and seven government agencies said individuals and companies, domestic or foreign, may not issue renminbi-linked stablecoins without official approval.
Authorities argued that such tokens mimic key functions of money and could threaten monetary sovereignty.
China Says Yuan Stablecoins Threaten Currency Stability
Stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies “perform some of the functions of fiat currencies,” the notice said, warning that circulation outside regulatory oversight could undermine the stability of the yuan.
The rules also target services tied to tokenized financial assets, including blockchain-based representations of bonds or equities.
Overseas entities are barred from offering related products to users inside China without permission from regulators.
Beijing reaffirmed its longstanding position on crypto payments, stating that assets such as Bitcoin and Ether do not hold legal tender status and that facilitating transactions or related services constitutes illegal activity.
The policy builds on a sweeping prohibition introduced by the central bank in 2021 that effectively removed cryptocurrency trading and payments from the domestic financial system.
Legal scholar and former sovereign wealth fund executive Winston Ma said the restrictions apply to both onshore and offshore versions of the renminbi.
The offshore yuan, known as CNH, is designed for foreign exchange flexibility while preserving capital controls.
The measures appear to fit a broader strategy of limiting privately issued digital currencies while promoting the state-backed digital yuan.
China has spent several years developing the e-CNY central bank digital currency and recently allowed commercial banks to share interest with users holding digital yuan wallets in an effort to increase adoption.
Japan, Hong Kong Embrace Stablecoin Regulation as China Tightens Rules
Elsewhere in Asia, policymakers have taken a different path. Japan introduced a legal framework for stablecoin issuance in 2023, while Hong Kong plans to begin licensing stablecoin issuers this year.
China briefly explored allowing private firms to issue yuan-pegged tokens in 2025, but later halted pilot programs.
Last year, the People’s Bank of China unveiled a framework that will allow commercial banks to pay interest on balances held in digital yuan wallets starting January 1, 2026.
Lu Lei, a deputy governor at the PBOC, said the change would shift the e-CNY beyond its original role as a digital version of cash and integrate it into banks’ asset and liability operations.
Global stablecoin transaction value reached $33 trillion in 2025, marking a 72% increase from the previous year, according to Bloomberg data compiled by Artemis Analytics.
USDC emerged as the most-used stablecoin by transaction volume, processing $18.3 trillion, while Tether’s USDT handled $13.3 trillion, despite maintaining its lead by market capitalization at $187 billion.
The surge in activity followed the passage of the GENIUS Act in July 2025, the first comprehensive U.S. regulatory framework for payment stablecoins.
The post China Bans Unapproved Yuan-Pegged Stablecoins Abroad to Protect Currency Stability appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Vitalik Buterin Donates to Shielded Labs for Zcash Crosslink Security Upgrade
TLDR:
- Buterin’s donation funds Crosslink development from prototype to incentivized testnet and production phase.
- Crosslink adds finality layer to Zcash’s PoW chain, preventing reversals and strengthening settlement guarantees.
- The upgrade enables shorter exchange confirmations and improves cross-chain integration reliability for Zcash.
- Shielded Labs operates independently from Zcash Dev Fund, relying on donations from network supporters.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has donated to Shielded Labs to advance Crosslink development for Zcash. The contribution will fund progression from prototype to incentivized testnet and production readiness.
Crosslink adds a finality layer to Zcash’s proof-of-work consensus, protecting against chain reorganizations and rollback attacks. This marks Buterin’s second donation to the organization.
Crosslink Enhances Zcash Security Architecture
Shielded Labs announced the donation will support Crosslink’s continued development. The upgrade strengthens Zcash’s existing proof-of-work consensus through a parallel finality layer.
Block production and economic activity remain on the proof-of-work chain. Meanwhile, the finality gadget anchors blocks and provides stronger settlement guarantees.
The architecture prevents confirmed transactions from being reversed. This reduction in double-spend risk increases confidence in transaction settlement across the network.
Exchanges can implement shorter confirmation requirements as a result. Cross-chain integrations gain improved reliability through the enhanced security model.
Applications requiring predictable settlement benefit from the increased consistency. The improvements facilitate easier integration into the broader crypto ecosystem.
Zcash maintains its existing security properties throughout the upgrade process. The design preserves the network’s core characteristics while adding protective measures.
Commenting on the donation, Buterin stated that Zcash is one of the most honorable crypto projects. He praised the network’s steadfast focus on privacy as a defining characteristic.
According to Buterin, Shielded Labs’ Crosslink work will allow Zcash to be more secure. The upgrade will enable operation on a lower security budget, supporting long-term sustainability.
Production Phase Will Focus on Technical Readiness
The donation will fund the productization of the existing Crosslink prototype. Shielded Labs plans to launch a persistent, incentivized testnet where participants can earn ZEC.
The transition into productionization involves multiple technical components. Design specifications require completion before mainnet consideration.
Security analysis will form a critical component of the development process. Audits will verify the robustness of the finality layer implementation.
Coordination with wallets and infrastructure providers ensures smooth integration. Proactive engagement with the Zcash community maintains transparency throughout development.
Progress toward mainnet activation depends on several factors. Technical readiness must meet established standards before deployment.
Security review processes need completion to validate the upgrade’s safety. Broad community support remains essential for major protocol changes.
Shielded Labs operates as a Swiss-based Zcash support organization. The team focuses on protocol development projects that strengthen network security.
Funding comes from donations by Zcash holders and supporters. The organization maintains independence from the Dev Fund and block rewards.
Buterin’s first contribution in 2023 supported formation of a dedicated Crosslink team. He has contributed to discussions around protocol design and security for years.
Shielded Labs acknowledged his continued engagement with the Zcash ecosystem. The organization expressed appreciation for his support in advancing network resilience.
Crypto World
VC in Latin America must throw out Silicon Valley’s playbook
Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.
The formulas that work well for venture capitalists investing in the United States — the blitzscaling mindset, the obsession with user growth over revenue, the eagerness to fund abstract infrastructure bets — simply don’t map onto Latin America, a region defined by macro instability and a consumer base that uses crypto out of necessity rather than ideology.
Summary
- Latin America isn’t Silicon Valley on a delay: Crypto adoption is driven by necessity — inflation, capital controls, remittances — not ideology or yield, so growth-at-all-costs models break fast.
- Revenue, liquidity, and licenses beat hype: Winning startups control local rails, banking relationships, and regulatory access; community buzz and abstract network effects don’t survive real-world stress.
- Scaling looks like logistics, not SaaS: Each new country is a new financial system, with political and macro risk baked in — VCs who don’t reprice that reality will keep misfiring.
The Silicon Valley playbook assumes two things: that capital is abundant, and that markets are homogenous. In Latin America, neither is true. Liquidity is thinner, operating costs are higher, and each major market has its own idiosyncratic rules, banks, tax environments, and political risks. VCs entering the region must unlearn the idea that a “regional rollout” is just a matter of translating the app and hiring a local general manager. Crypto companies here scale more like logistics companies than software startups.
If VCs from the United States want to fund projects in Latin America’s crypto scene, they must write a completely new investing thesis. That means funding revenue-first businesses, valuing regulatory licensing more than “community,” prioritizing teams who understand local corridors, and letting go of the idea that what works in San Francisco will work in São Paulo. Latin America’s crypto market is not a derivative of the U.S. market; it is its own ecosystem with its own constraints and opportunities. Investors who recognize that early will dominate the next decade.
Latin America’s unique characteristics
The biggest mistake venture capitalists make when investing in Latin America is assuming the region is merely an earlier stage of the same market dynamics they understand in the United States. That assumption quietly shapes everything, from how they evaluate products to how they price risk… and it is wrong.
In the United States, crypto adoption is often fueled by ideology, experimentation, and yield-chasing. Failure is tolerated. Switching costs are low. In Latin America, crypto adoption is more utilitarian than aspirational. People use blockchain technology to protect savings from inflation, access dollars, move money across borders, or navigate capital controls. These users are not early adopters in the typical Silicon Valley sense; they are economically constrained actors solving immediate problems.
This distinction matters because it breaks the growth-at-all-costs mindset. Latin American crypto users are pragmatic and price-sensitive. If a product is slow, expensive, unreliable, or confusing, it is abandoned immediately. There is no patience for onboarding funnels or roadmap promises. Products must work from day one, under stress, at a reasonable scale. So applying Valley-style growth models (subsidizing usage and deferring monetization) is a mistake.
The error compounds when investors treat Latin America as a downstream extension of U.S. crypto trends. Too many funds approach the region looking to localize whatever is hot in San Francisco: the next DeFi primitive, the next infrastructure layer, the next community-first protocol.
But Latin America is not waiting for imported innovation. It is already pioneering real-world crypto use cases under conditions far harsher than those faced by developed markets. In that sense, Latin America is a leading indicator, not a lagging one. Many of the problems crypto claims it will solve in the future are already present in the region today.
Trust dynamics reinforce this divergence. In Silicon Valley’s online-native culture, Crypto Twitter still matters enormously. As does Discord. In Latin America, trust is built offline, through institutions, brands, customer support, regulatory standing, and physical presence. Users care less about slick community strategies and more about whether a product works during a currency crisis or a banking disruption.
The art of investing
The Silicon Valley model assumes abundant capital and forgiving markets; assumptions that simply do not hold in Latin America. That’s why revenue matters much earlier for startups in the region. Liquidity is thinner, fundraising cycles are longer, and macro shocks are frequent. A startup that fails to generate revenue early is very exposed.
Scaling further exposes the limits of software-first thinking. In the United States, expanding regionally is largely a question of marketing spend and infrastructure. In Latin America, each new country is a new financial system. It involves new banks, new payment rails, new tax regimes, new FX controls, new regulators, and new political risks. Expanding jurisdictionally is like building a logistics corridor. Investors who expect SaaS-style expansion curves systematically misjudge timelines and execution risk.
Liquidity is another axis where the Silicon Valley model fails. VCs tend to prioritize abstract network effects, assuming global scale will naturally translate into defensibility. In the Latin American crypto scene, the real bottleneck is liquidity fragmentation. Winning companies control local fiat on- and off-ramps and maintain strong banking relationships. Local liquidity, not global narratives, determines success.
Regulation completes the picture
U.S. crypto investors often celebrate regulatory gray zones as opportunities to move fast. In Latin America, regulatory arbitrage is not a viable long-term strategy. Regulation is fragmented, but unavoidable. Banking relationships, licenses, and compliance frameworks are competitive moats. Companies that “move fast and break things” often destroy their ability to operate at all. Investors who fail to value regulatory depth consistently underestimate what durability looks like in this market.
Finally, risk itself must be reframed. Silicon Valley underwriting models focus heavily on product-market fit and technical execution. In Latin America, risk is just as macro and political. Elections can trigger capital controls overnight. Banking partners can disappear. Regulatory frameworks can shift abruptly. Investors need to adapt their risk models to avoid mispricing outcomes.
Investing in Latin America isn’t necessarily harder; it’s just different. Crypto adoption here is real, demand-driven, and already embedded in daily economic life in many places. Investors who insist on applying Silicon Valley’s playbook will continue to misunderstand the market. Those who shift their mindset will end up backing the companies with the right DNA.
-
Video4 days agoWhen Money Enters #motivation #mindset #selfimprovement
-
Tech3 days agoWikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now there’s a plugin to avoid them.
-
Politics5 days agoSky News Presenter Criticises Lord Mandelson As Greedy And Duplicitous
-
Crypto World7 days agoU.S. government enters partial shutdown, here’s how it impacts bitcoin and ether
-
Sports7 days agoSinner battles Australian Open heat to enter last 16, injured Osaka pulls out
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin Drops Below $80K, But New Buyers are Entering the Market
-
Tech12 hours agoFirst multi-coronavirus vaccine enters human testing, built on UW Medicine technology
-
Sports4 hours agoJD Vance booed as Team USA enters Winter Olympics opening ceremony
-
Crypto World5 days agoMarket Analysis: GBP/USD Retreats From Highs As EUR/GBP Enters Holding Pattern
-
Sports22 hours ago
New and Huge Defender Enter Vikings’ Mock Draft Orbit
-
NewsBeat18 hours agoSavannah Guthrie’s mother’s blood was found on porch of home, police confirm as search enters sixth day: Live
-
Business2 days agoQuiz enters administration for third time
-
NewsBeat4 days agoUS-brokered Russia-Ukraine talks are resuming this week
-
Sports5 days agoShannon Birchard enters Canadian curling history with sixth Scotties title
-
NewsBeat5 days agoGAME to close all standalone stores in the UK after it enters administration
-
NewsBeat2 days agoStill time to enter Bolton News’ Best Hairdresser 2026 competition
-
NewsBeat5 hours agoDriving instructor urges all learners to do 1 check before entering roundabout
-
Crypto World3 days agoRussia’s Largest Bitcoin Miner BitRiver Enters Bankruptcy Proceedings: Report
-
NewsBeat4 days agoImages of Mamdani with Epstein are AI-generated. Here’s how we know
-
Crypto World2 days agoHere’s Why Bitcoin Analysts Say BTC Market Has Entered “Full Capitulation”


