A tentative agreement on stablecoin rewards has renewed hope for the CLARITY Act, a key piece of cryptocurrency legislation. 

The agreement, which resolves a major conflict between traditional banks and the digital asset industry, has provided a boost to the stalled legislation. However, experts are warning that the CLARITY Act still faces significant challenges and must overcome a series of unresolved issues before it can be passed.

In March 2026, key lawmakers, including Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), reached a “tentative deal” with White House officials on the issue of stablecoin rewards. This agreement aims to address the concerns raised by traditional Wall Street institutions about stablecoin rewards offered by exchanges. These rewards, critics argue, could lead to a mass migration of deposits from traditional banks to crypto exchanges.

Senator Tillis and Alsobrooks’ deal was seen as a major step forward in the push to resolve the issue, as it has been one of the key stumbling blocks holding up the passage of the CLARITY Act since January. The White House, through crypto policy adviser Patrick Witt, praised the bipartisan efforts, calling the agreement a “major milestone” toward passing the legislation.

While the agreement on stablecoin rewards is a significant development, the CLARITY Act still faces other hurdles. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, warned that while the stablecoin dispute is the current focus, it is not the only challenge. Thorn pointed out several other contentious topics that need to be resolved, including decentralized finance (DeFi) regulation, developer protections, and the powers of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Thorn emphasized that the window for passing the CLARITY Act this year is closing rapidly. He stated that if the bill does not make it through the Senate Banking Committee by the end of April, the odds of it passing in 2026 would become extremely low. With limited time left for discussion, Thorn and other experts caution that the clock is ticking for the CLARITY Act to move forward.

The road ahead for the CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act, which aims to establish comprehensive regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrency, is seen as crucial for the industry’s long-term growth. However, with the stablecoin rewards issue now addressed, lawmakers and the White House must turn their attention to the remaining obstacles that could prevent the bill from reaching the Senate floor. The legislation needs to pass the Senate by early May to have a realistic chance of becoming law in 2026.

TLDR:

• Bitcoin’s 30-day correlation with the S&P 500 turned negative following a structural market reset in October 2025. 
• A $19B liquidation event wiped 70,000 BTC in open interest, permanently altering crypto’s leverage and liquidity profile. 
• Spot Bitcoin ETF outflows converted institutional vehicles into selling pressure, deepening the gap between BTC and equities. 
• Geopolitical tensions in Iran triggered equity declines while Bitcoin gained, reflecting partial capital rotation into BTC.

Bitcoin has broken its historically positive correlation with the S&P 500, entering a rare decoupling phase. CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost noted that the 30-day correlation between Bitcoin and equities has turned negative.

This shift follows a major liquidation event in October 2025 that restructured the crypto market. The divergence is driven by differences in liquidity, leverage, and capital flows between both asset classes.

October 2025 Liquidation Reset Bitcoin’s Market Structure

On October 10–11, 2025, the crypto market experienced a severe liquidation event. Roughly $19 billion in leveraged positions were eliminated within just two days.

Open interest dropped by approximately 70,000 BTC, resetting the market’s overall risk capacity. This was not merely a price shock but a structural reset of how the market absorbs leverage.

Following the event, leverage recovery across crypto markets remained slow and unsteady. Liquidity weakened across trading venues, and traders adopted more defensive strategies as a result.

Persistent hedging demand in derivatives markets reflected a broader shift in trader sentiment. In contrast, equities recovered steadily, supported by strong AI-related corporate earnings throughout the period.

This divergence exposed the different forces driving each asset class at the time. Equities moved on corporate fundamentals, while Bitcoin responded primarily to shifting liquidity conditions.

The two markets, once closely correlated, began operating on entirely separate dynamics. Bitcoin’s traditional role as a high-beta equity proxy lost much of its credibility in the process.

With open interest reduced, downside pressure on the asset became more contained over time. New inflows could now move prices more directly than in prior market cycles.

The lower leverage environment gave Bitcoin a distinctly different risk profile than before. This structural shift set the stage for the decoupling that followed in subsequent months.

ETF Outflows and Geopolitical Tensions Deepen the Divide

Spot Bitcoin ETF outflows added further pressure to an already fragile market environment. Institutional redemptions turned ETF vehicles into sources of selling pressure rather than demand.

This reflected weakening institutional appetite at a critical point in the market cycle. However, the reduced leverage environment limited the extent of overall price damage during this period.

Rising geopolitical tensions involving Iran then applied fresh pressure on equity markets. Higher energy prices pushed inflation concerns upward, lifting bond yields in the process.

Elevated yields raised risks to corporate earnings, pulling broader stock valuations lower. Equities declined while BTC moved in the opposite direction during this window.

Bitcoin held its ground and showed relative strength during the equity weakness. Some capital rotated from stocks into Bitcoin as a short-term diversification move.

This reflected a change in how certain investors viewed the asset within a broader portfolio. The rotation was partial but sufficient to support prices during the equity drawdown.

Going forward, ETF flow trends, open interest recovery, and macro conditions remain the key variables. A return of leverage and institutional ETF demand could narrow the gap between both markets.

For now, crypto and equities appear to be in a fragmented, unsynchronized phase rather than a unified one.

There was a time when online gambling moved in one direction and every operator followed the same path. Build a sportsbook, add some casino games, process payments through banks, and compete on odds and marketing spend. Bet365 mastered that formula better than almost anyone. But the path is forking. A new class of platforms is emerging that runs on different infrastructure, targets a different audience, and measures success by different standards. ZunaBet is the clearest example of that new class. Setting it alongside Bet365 does not just compare two gambling platforms. It maps the point where the industry started heading in two directions at once.

Bet365: The Company That Defined the Category

Bet365 started in a portable building in Stoke-on-Trent in 2000. Denise Coates had a hunch that betting was about to move online in a serious way, and she was right in a manner that produced one of the most remarkable business stories in British corporate history. Twenty-five years later, Bet365 is still privately held by the Coates family, still headquartered in Stoke, and still one of the most visited gambling websites on the planet.

Sports betting is the product that made Bet365 what it is. The coverage is extraordinary. Every globally recognized sport and dozens of regional ones are represented with deep markets and consistently sharp odds. The live betting product deserves particular mention — thousands of events run simultaneously with in-play markets that update in real time, paired with a streaming service that gives players direct access to the action. It is the kind of product that took years of investment and iteration to build, and it shows.

The casino has grown into a meaningful part of the business over time. Thousands of titles from established providers cover slots, table games, and live dealer formats. It is a stronger casino offering than most sportsbook-first operators manage, though it has not expanded as aggressively as platforms that treat casino as their primary business.

Financial transactions go through the standard set of traditional channels. Debit cards, bank transfers, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, and assorted regional options. No cryptocurrency. Withdrawal times depend on the method — e-wallets are typically the quickest while bank transfers can take several days depending on the player’s location and their bank’s processing schedule.

New accounts are greeted with bet credit offers that vary by market. Ongoing loyalty operates without a formal tier structure — Bet365 sends personalized promotions to active players on its own terms. The company has always operated on the principle that the product itself is the best retention tool, and its financial results suggest that principle holds up.

Bet365 perfected online gambling as it existed through the 2000s and 2010s. Every part of the operation reflects that era’s best thinking about how a betting platform should work. The question hanging over it — and every operator of its generation — is whether that thinking still applies to the players who are showing up now.

ZunaBet: Starting Where Others Have Not Reached Yet

ZunaBet launched in 2026 through Strathvale Group Ltd with an Anjouan gaming license and a founding team with more than two decades of combined gambling industry experience. The platform was not built on top of anything that came before it. There was no legacy system, no prior business model, and no inherited assumptions about how things had to work. The team started fresh and built a product that reflects the current state of technology, player expectations, and financial infrastructure rather than the state of things when Bet365 opened its doors.

The game catalog is the most striking entry point. ZunaBet lists over 11,000 titles drawn from 63 providers — Pragmatic Play, Evolution, Hacksaw Gaming, Yggdrasil, BGaming, and a long tail of additional studios covering every format in the casino space. Slots dominate the count but RNG table games and live dealer rooms run deep. That library exceeds what Bet365 offers on the casino side, which is an extraordinary position for a platform that has existed for a fraction of the time.

Sports betting runs parallel to the casino as an equal product rather than an add-on. Football, basketball, tennis, NHL, combat sports, and virtual sports are all covered comprehensively. The esports section stands apart from what most traditional operators provide, featuring dedicated markets for CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant with genuine depth rather than surface-level inclusion. Bet365 keeps a clear lead in live betting complexity, event streaming, and the breadth of niche sporting markets available. ZunaBet answers with a globally oriented sportsbook and an esports product built for the audience that is growing fastest.

The entire financial layer runs on cryptocurrency. Over 20 coins are accepted — BTC, ETH, USDT on several blockchains, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and more. No transaction fees from the platform. Withdrawals that clear without banking intermediaries slowing the process. Every movement of money on ZunaBet happens on blockchain rails, which means no third-party timelines, no weekend blackouts, and no fees extracted between the player and their funds.

New players receive up to $5,000 in deposit matches plus 75 free spins across three deposits — 100% up to $2,000 with 25 spins first, 50% up to $1,500 with 25 spins second, and 100% up to $1,500 with 25 spins third. That welcome package carries substantially more value than what Bet365 extends in most markets.

The technical package wraps everything in a dark-themed HTML5 interface with responsive design, fast performance, native apps for iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS, and round-the-clock live chat support.

The Loyalty Split

Bet365 rewards regular players on its own terms. Personalized bonuses and promotional offers arrive in active accounts based on criteria the platform sets internally. There are no published tiers, no branded progression system, and no public roadmap showing players what continued activity will earn them. The approach is quiet and closed, reflecting a philosophy that strong product quality should be sufficient to keep players engaged without layering a complex rewards structure on top.

ZunaBet built its loyalty program to be the opposite of quiet. The dragon evolution system puts progression front and center through a mascot called Zuno and six defined tiers — Squire, Warden, Champion, Divine, Knight, and Ultimate. Rakeback starts at 1% and increases to 20% at the top tier. Free spins climb to 1,000 at the highest levels. VIP club access and double wheel spins reward players as they advance through the stages.

Everything about the system is designed for visibility and engagement. Players know exactly where they stand at all times. The next tier is always visible, its requirements are always clear, and the rewards for reaching it are always published. The gamified design draws from video game progression systems where advancement is part of the core experience rather than something that happens passively in the background. Bet365’s closed-door approach works for players who do not particularly care about loyalty mechanics and just want a good sportsbook. ZunaBet’s open-book approach works for players who want their time on a platform to feel like it is building toward something.

Two Financial Worlds

Bet365 processes payments at a scale that few companies in any industry can match. Its infrastructure connects to banking systems, card networks, and e-wallet providers across dozens of countries, handling millions of daily transactions with the reliability that its size demands. That achievement should not be minimized.

What cannot be engineered away, however, are the limitations that come with that infrastructure. Banks dictate processing windows. Card networks impose their own policies. E-wallets introduce additional intermediary steps. Public holidays and weekends create gaps. Fees attach at various points depending on the method and the jurisdiction. The player enters a system where speed, cost, and timing are controlled by institutions outside the platform.

ZunaBet removed those institutions from the equation. Crypto goes directly between the player’s wallet and the platform without passing through any intermediary. There is no processing window because there is no processor. There is no weekend delay because the blockchain does not observe weekends. There is no fee because no middleman exists to charge one. A player’s withdrawal follows the same path and the same timeline regardless of when it is initiated or how much it involves.

The practical impact of this difference grows every time a player experiences it. Speed becomes the expectation. Fee-free becomes the baseline. Consistency becomes the standard. Going back to a system where a withdrawal might arrive tomorrow or might arrive Thursday starts to feel like a step backward once the alternative is familiar. And the number of players for whom that alternative is familiar expands with every month that cryptocurrency adoption continues to grow.

Where Each Platform Sits in the Bigger Picture

Bet365 represents the summit of what online gambling built on traditional infrastructure can achieve. No operator has done it better, and the company’s position within that framework is as secure as any in the industry. For players who operate in fiat currency and prioritize sportsbook depth and live betting above all else, Bet365 is still the answer.

ZunaBet represents what happens when the framework itself changes. Different financial infrastructure. Different player expectations. Different ideas about what a loyalty program should feel like and how many games a platform should offer and how quickly money should move. It launched with over 11,000 games, 63 providers, more than 20 cryptocurrencies, zero fees, a $5,000 welcome package, dedicated apps everywhere, a complete sportsbook with real esports depth, and a loyalty system designed by people who understand gaming culture as well as they understand gambling operations.

The industry is splitting in two. One side runs on banks and cards and serves an audience that has been gambling online for years. The other runs on crypto and serves an audience that is arriving with new expectations and new habits. Bet365 owns the first side. ZunaBet was built to lead the second. Both platforms are good at what they do. But only one of them is aimed at the part of the market that is growing, and the numbers it launched with suggest it knows exactly how to capture that growth.

Gold is approaching a technical bear market, down nearly 20% from its January all time high. Traditionally viewed as a store of value and hedge against geopolitical uncertainty, gold’s recent performance challenges that narrative. Despite escalating tensions in the Middle East, prices have fallen around 10%, since the war started at the end of February.

Markets have also repriced the interest rate outlook, with cuts now largely pushed out and policy expected to remain restrictive through December 2026. At the same time, rising oil prices, driven by geopolitical risk, are adding upward pressure on inflation, reinforcing the higher for longer rate environment, a key headwind for gold.

While adjusting for M2 money supply, which includes cash, deposits, and other liquid forms of money, gold is trading near levels seen at major historical peaks in 1974 and 2011, when it was $200 and $1,800 per ounce, respectively. On this basis, gold appears to be consolidating at elevated levels, potentially forming a cyclical floor relative to global liquidity.

In contrast, bitcoin relative to M2 remains in a consolidation phase similar to 2024, while retesting its 2021 highs on a liquidity adjusted basis. Historically, each cycle has seen bitcoin move above prior peaks when adjusted for money supply. With bitcoin still about 40% below its October high, this may represent a typical consolidation range before further upside.

Gold has traded alongside bitcoin tick for tick since it broke down from $5,000 on Wednesday, showing elements of positive correlation after diverging from the crypto markets prior.

TLDR:

• Bitcoin fell over 3% in 24 hours, sliding from above $74,000 to around $68,700 on Sunday amid macro fears.
• The Crypto Fear and Greed Index dropped to an extreme fear reading of 10, reflecting sharp decline in market confidence.
• Trader Lennaert Snyder targets a Bitcoin drop to $65,580, planning to add shorts after a confirmed bearish structure break.
• Institutional buyers continue accumulating BTC as exchange supply hits multi-year lows, contrasting with heavy retail panic selling.

Bitcoin fell sharply on Sunday, dropping from above $74,000 to around $68,700 in a matter of hours. The move pushed the Crypto Fear & Greed Index to an extreme fear reading of just 10.

Rising oil prices, a pause in Federal Reserve rate cuts, and ongoing geopolitical tensions drove the sell-off. Bitcoin recorded a 3.11% decline over 24 hours, with trading volume reaching approximately $29.1 billion.

Short Positions Build as Bears Set Their Sights on $65,000

The latest price drop has given bearish traders confidence to hold and grow their short positions. Selling pressure remained active throughout the week, contributing to a total seven-day decline of 4.02%.

This combination of macro pressure and bearish momentum pushed market fear to its most extreme reading in recent weeks.

Crypto trader Lennaert Snyder shared his bearish stance openly on social media during Sunday’s session. “My target is still the ~$65,580 low, and possibly even lower for Bitcoin,” Snyder wrote. He also planned to add margin to his shorts using the upper wick of the next weekly candle.

Snyder noted caution around a key level at $72,700, identifying it as a Fair Value Gap zone. He stated he would only enter a trade after seeing a liquidity push and a bearish market structure break.

His approach pointed to a disciplined strategy, waiting for price confirmation before committing to new short trades.

A notable counterrisk, however, remains for those currently holding short positions. Whale Insider reported that $5 billion in crypto shorts would face forced liquidation if Bitcoin climbs back to $75,000. That level therefore becomes both a target for bulls and a danger zone for active short sellers in the market.

Institutional Buyers Accumulate as Exchange Supply Drops to Multi-Year Lows

Even as retail sentiment fell to extreme fear, institutional buyers continued accumulating Bitcoin through the downturn.

This divergence between retail and large-scale buyers has been a repeated pattern during past crypto market corrections. Institutions appear to view the current dip as an entry point rather than a reason to sell.

Exchange supply has also dropped to multi-year lows, further shaping the current market picture. Lower exchange balances typically point to Bitcoin being moved into cold storage for long-term holding.

This movement often tightens available sell-side supply on exchanges, setting the stage for potential price rebounds.

Market watchers are now turning their attention to Monday’s session, closely eyeing the $72,000 price level. A recovery above that zone could signal a momentum shift and place short positions at increased risk. Bulls will need consistent buying volume to challenge the bearish tone that dominated the weekend.

Bitcoin’s near-term path will largely depend on how macro factors unfold over the coming days. Bears are holding firm to the $65,580 target, while bulls look for a sustained break above $72,000.

The market remains at a crossroads, with either outcome carrying major consequences for active traders on both sides.

Resolv Labs recently experienced a major exploit in its USR stablecoin system, leading to the minting of 80 million unbacked tokens. 

Meanwhile, this triggered a sharp drop in the token’s value, causing it to fall as low as $0.14 before rebounding to $0.42. The incident has raised concerns among decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and users exposed to the exploit, prompting a rapid response to contain the fallout.

As Crypto News reported earlier on Sunday, Resolv Labs confirmed that an attacker had exploited the minting mechanics of its USR stablecoin. The attacker was able to create tens of millions of unbacked USR tokens and sell them through DeFi pools. This led to a dramatic depeg of the token, which dropped as low as $0.14, 86% below its intended $1 value.

The price of USR quickly rebounded to $0.42, but the attack had already caused significant damage. Resolv Labs reassured users by stating that the collateral pool “remains fully intact” and that the issue was isolated to the USR issuance mechanics. The team has paused the protocol to assess the situation and prevent further exploitation.

Following the exploit, DeFi protocols that had exposure to USR moved quickly to contain any potential damage. Lido, Morpho, and Aave all issued statements confirming that their systems were unaffected, although some vaults did have exposure to the exploit.

According to Michael Pearl of Cyvers, the risk from the exploit seemed concentrated in lending and leverage markets, particularly those using USR or RLP as collateral. Some platforms like Euler, Venus, and Fluid paused markets or isolated vaults to prevent further risks. Pearl noted that the impact appeared to be localized, with no signs of a broader contagion affecting the entire DeFi ecosystem.

Moreover, despite Resolv Labs’ smart contracts undergoing multiple audits, the exploit has raised questions about the limitations of these audits. Security firm Pashov, which had audited Resolv’s staking module in July 2025, pointed out that the attack likely stemmed from an operational security flaw rather than a design issue. The firm highlighted the potential compromise of a private key as the root cause of the exploit.

Experts like Pearl argued that real-time monitoring powered by artificial intelligence is essential to detect anomalies in protocol activity. Monitoring mint and burn flows and validating supply against reserves would help detect issues before they escalate.

Containment and recovery efforts

Resolv Labs has reassured its users that it is actively investigating the exploit and working on recovery. While the exploit did not result in any loss of assets from the collateral pool, the attack has emphasized the need for continuous monitoring and stronger operational security. The DeFi community is closely watching how Resolv Labs handles the situation, especially as the price of USR stabilizes and more data on the full impact of the exploit becomes available.

TLDR:

• TMSC holds only 11 days of LNG reserve, the least of any major semiconductor economy on Earth.
  
• Helium from Qatar powers EUV machines that print every advanced AI chip at 3-nanometre scale globally.
  
• Helium spot prices have surged up to 100% since Iranian strikes shut down Qatar’s Ras Laffan complex.
  
• Two US carrier strike groups have shifted to the Gulf, thinning Pacific presence and raising Taiwan risk.

TSMC produces 90 percent of the world’s most advanced logic chips. Taiwan, where TSMC operates, imports 97 percent of its energy and holds only 11 days of gas in reserve.

A war in the Persian Gulf has now disrupted Taiwan’s helium supply. Helium is critical for printing transistors at 3 nanometres, with no substitute available. The crisis has put global semiconductor supply chains under immediate pressure.

Helium Shortage Pushes Advanced Chip Manufacturing Toward a Critical Threshold

Qatar’s Ras Laffan complex once processed roughly one-third of the world’s helium. Iranian strikes shut it down, and repairs will take three to five years.

Taiwan relies on Qatar for the bulk of its helium supply. SK Hynix also sourced 64.7 percent of its helium from Qatar. Helium spot prices have since surged between 40 and 100 percent.

Helium cools the EUV lithography systems that print chips at 3 nanometres. It purges etching chambers of contamination and tests wafer seals.

No substitute for helium exists in these manufacturing processes. Without it, EUV machines stop entirely not slowly, but completely.

Analyst Shanaka Perera wrote on X that helium is “the molecule the market is not pricing.” He added that without it, EUV machines stop “not slow down. Stop.” Bloomberg reported TSMC may prioritise AI chip production over consumer products during shortages.

Fitch Ratings flagged Taiwan and South Korea as the most exposed semiconductor economies. TSMC’s shares have fallen 7 percent since the war began.

Taiwan holds the smallest energy reserve among major semiconductor economies. South Korea holds 52 days of reserve; Japan holds three weeks.

Geopolitical Pressure Compounds Taiwan’s Strategic Energy Exposure

Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs says helium supplies are secured through mid-May. Negotiations for June are ongoing, and officials called the situation a controllable risk. The government also announced plans to raise the mandatory LNG reserve from 11 to 14 days next year.

The Persian Gulf war has redirected two US carrier strike groups away from the Pacific. This has thinned the naval presence that historically deters pressure on Taiwan. Regional tensions around Taiwan have been building since 2023.

Beijing does not need an invasion to apply pressure on Taiwan. A military exercise near the island during a supply crisis achieves disruption through perception. That signal alone can alter market behaviour and shipping logistics.

Perera noted that seven reinsurance letters closed the Strait of Hormuz commercially in five days. The same mechanism could apply to the Taiwan Strait, which is 110 miles wide at its broadest point. If risk models shift, insurance letters follow, and shipping stops without any military action.

Taiwan imports 97 percent of its energy, with one-third from the Middle East. Qatar remains the dominant LNG supplier.

The chain connecting helium, LNG, and the world’s advanced chips now runs through an active war zone. TSMC remains the most critical manufacturer of advanced semiconductors on Earth.

Resolv Labs moved Sunday to reassure users after an exploit hit the issuance mechanics of its USR stablecoin, knocking the token off its dollar peg and prompting decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols with exposure to move quickly to contain any fallout.

Cointelegraph reported earlier Sunday that an attacker exploited USR’s minting mechanics, creating tens of millions of unbacked tokens and dumping them through DeFi pools, which broke the stablecoin’s peg and prompted Resolv to pause protocol functions as it assessed the damage.

The token dropped as low as $0.14 (86% below its intended $1 price) after the exploit before rebounding to $0.42 at the time of writing, according to data from CoinGecko.

In a recent statement on X, the Resolv team said that the collateral pool “remains fully intact,” and that the problem appears “isolated to USR issuance mechanics.” Containment and impact assessment remain ongoing.

Onchain data from Arkham, corroborated by Web3 security firm Cyvers, showed that the attacker had converted most of the minted USR into Ether (ETH), selling part of the haul for about 11,400 ETH (around $24 million). Independent analysts also noted that the remaining 36.74 million USR was “still being continuously dumped.”

Michael Pearl, vice president GTM and strategy at Cyvers, told Cointelegraph that since the supply had inflated faster than the market could absorb and the token had immediately depegged, the value of the remaining tokens was significantly impaired.

Related: Google Threat Intel flags ‘Ghostblade’ crypto-stealing malware

DeFi protocols move to contain fallout

Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols with exposure to Resolv raced to clarify their positions. Liquid staking provider Lido said that Lido Earn user funds were safe. Morpho cofounder Merlin Egalite emphasized that the lending protocol’s own contracts were unaffected and that only certain vaults had exposure, and Aave’s founder, Stani Kulechov, said that the platform had no direct USR exposure and that Resolv was repaying its outstanding debt.

The X account “yieldsandmore” pointed to potential losses in Resolv’s junior RLP tranche, highlighting possible knock-on effects for yield platforms such as Stream and yoUSD that used RLP as collateral. 

Pearl told Cointelegraph that, based on available data, the exposure appeared to be “relatively concentrated” in lending markets and leverage loops “rather than system-wide,” and primarily in protocols that integrated USR, wstUSR, or RLP into lending, leverage or yield strategies.

Related: Hacked crypto tokens drop 61% on average and rarely recover, Immunefi report says

He said that several protocols, such as Euler, Venus, Lista and Fluid, had taken precautionary actions such as pausing markets or isolating vaults, while others had declared no exposure at all. “It is more accurate to describe the risk as concentrated with localized spillover, rather than widespread contagion,” he said.

Ledger chief technical officer Charles Guillemet also assessed the fallout on X, stating that, due to the relatively small size of USR, “this is not a Terra Luna-type event.”

Questions around limitations of security audits

Resolv’s smart contracts have undergone multiple audits since 2024, but Pearl said that, while audits were “necessary,” they were also “inherently static and scoped.” Real-time, artificial intelligence-powered monitoring to “continuously analyze protocol activity” was needed, he argued, to detect anomalies as they emerge.

For stablecoin systems specifically, he said that meant monitoring mint and burn flows against expected behavior in real time, continuously validating supply against reserves and backing assets, and detecting anomalies in oracle inputs, pricing and liquidity conditions. 

Security firm Pashov, which audited Resolv’s staking module in July 2025, told Cointelegraph that Resolv’s design was “good,” and that the root cause was “not the design so much as the private key compromise,” which was likely an operational security flaw. “We have to understand how that happens,” he said.

Cointelegraph reached out to Resolv Labs for comment but had not received a response by publication.

AI Eye: IronClaw rivals OpenClaw, Olas launches bots for Polymarket