Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Ondo surges as Franklin Templeton enters tokenized ETF market

Published

on

AAVE price risks fresh plunge under $100, bears eye 2-year lows
  • Ondo price hovered around $0.26 on Thursday.
  • A partnership with Franklin Templeton brings $1.7 trillion AUM ETFs on-chain.
  • The real-world assets market continues to attract institutional adoption.

The Ondo token traded higher after Ondo Finance announced a key partnership with Franklin Templeton, the global asset manager overseeing $1.7 trillion in assets under management (AUM).

According to the Ondo Finance team, this collaboration is about tokenizing Franklin Templeton’s ETFs to bolster adoption via on-chain access.

The move comes as traditional investment products get increased attention through real-world assets (RWA).

Franklin Templeton’s tokenized ETFs now live on Ondo Global Markets, including the Growth ETF, Income Equity focus ETF and High Yield Corporate ETF.

This launch sees Ondo, a leading RWA protocol, continue to expand its ecosystem. It’s attracting institutional interest amid rising demand for tokenized securities.

Advertisement

“Franklin is partnering with Ondo to have all their ETFs be tokenized so people on-chain can enjoy the awesomeness of cheap beta,” Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas noted via X.

“Like I’ve been saying, tokenization isn’t a threat to ETFs, on the contrary, it’s a distribution mechanism.”

Ondo, Chainlink and Avalanche are some of the coins riding high on the tokenized assets narrative.

Adoption trends across the globe, with major banks and other top financial institutions keen on a piece of the cake, mean notable long-term gains for ONDO among others.

Advertisement

“Financial assets are becoming software. And as more assets move into the digital wallet-based ecosystem, there’s endless potential for their on-chain utility,” Franklin Templeton’s Robert Crossley said at a tokenization summit in London.

Ondo price analysis

Ondo (ONDO) price reacted bullishly to the announcement, climbing to highs of $0.273.

Despite the optimism around tokenization and real-world assets, RWA ecosystem tokens mirror the broader market in terms of recent performance.

Ondo has traded lower since hitting resistance around $2.00 in late 2024.

Advertisement

The downtrend accelerated below $1.00 in September 2025, with Ondo hitting multi-year lows as cryptocurrencies fell in February this year.

From a technical perspective, key support holds at $0.24 (recent swing low) and $0.21. The latter provides a solid reload zone amid broader market volatility.

Meanwhile, resistance looms at $0.28, with a breakout potentially targeting $0.50.

If Bitcoin maintains stability above $70,000, the next leg up could see ONDO test the $1 mark. Hurdles above this psychological level would be around $1.20 and $1.50.

Advertisement

However, macroeconomic risks like US Federal Reserve rate decisions could combine with geopolitical shocks to cap gains.

BTC is eyeing the $75,000 mark, but an escalation in the Iran war could plunge prices to lows of $50,000.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

How a Seed Phrase Leak Led to a $176M Bitcoin Theft Case

Published

on

How a Seed Phrase Leak Led to a $176M Bitcoin Theft Case

Code is not the weakest point in crypto thefts

In crypto, security is usually regarded as a technical issue. You are asked to safeguard your private keys, rely on a hardware wallet and steer clear of phishing links. Yet a prominent case in the UK reveals that the real vulnerability in this case might have had nothing to do with code.

The UK High Court is currently reviewing a case involving the alleged theft of 2,323 Bitcoin (BTC), worth about $176 million. The theft did not stem from hacking or malware. Instead, it began with a seed phrase being exposed, which became the single point of failure in self-custody.

The dispute centers on Ping Fai Yuen, who claims that his estranged wife, Fun Yung Li, and her sister gained access to his Bitcoin by secretly recording his wallet’s recovery information.

The assets were held in a hardware wallet, designed to keep private keys completely offline and shielded from remote threats. Yet the theft still happened and it required no breach of encryption.

Advertisement

Court documents suggest the theft only required discovering the seed phrase.

Alleged timeline of the crypto theft

The allegations describe events that suggest surveillance rather than digital intrusion.

  • The individuals in question are accused of using a camera or recording device to capture the seed phrase and related codes.

  • The claimant later learned of the scheme after receiving a warning from his daughter.

  • He then set up audio recording equipment, which he says captured conversations about moving the funds.

  • The Bitcoin was subsequently transferred to 71 separate wallet addresses.

No additional movements have appeared on the blockchain since Dec. 21, 2023, indicating that the assets have remained inactive since the reported transfer.

Authorities are said to have confiscated devices and cold wallets as part of the inquiry, although the proceedings are still ongoing.

Advertisement

Did you know? In several past cases, hidden cameras, not hackers, have been the weakest link in crypto security. Physical surveillance has quietly become one of the most underestimated threats to self-custodied digital assets.

Why the seed phrase mattered in the UK crypto theft

To understand the case, you need to grasp a core principle of crypto: Whoever has access to the seed phrase has full control of the funds.

A hardware wallet shields private keys from online risks. But the seed phrase, typically 12 to 24 words, serves as a full backup of the entire wallet.

Finding the seed phrase allows anyone to:

Advertisement
  • Rebuild the wallet on any other device

  • Access all the associated funds

  • Move the assets without ever touching the original hardware

Put simply, once the seed phrase becomes known, the physical device loses all relevance.

The surveillance element: An uncommon form of compromise

What stands out in this matter is the reported method used to carry out the breach.

Rather than relying on phishing or malicious software, the allegations center on visual or audio capture, possibly through a hidden camera or covert recording.

This brings attention to a seldom-mentioned risk: side-channel exposure.

Seed phrases are frequently written down, spoken or typed during setup. If any of those moments are watched or recorded:

Advertisement
  • The phrase can be pieced together.

  • The wallet can be copied elsewhere.

  • Assets can be relocated without immediate traces.

In environments full of smart devices, cameras and shared spaces, this type of risk continues to rise.

The UK High Court’s early stance

The matter came before the UK High Court, where Justice Cotter examined the evidence presented.

Although this does not constitute a final decision in the case, the judge indicated that the claimant had demonstrated a very high probability of success.

Among the elements considered were:

Advertisement

The court also stressed the need for swift action, citing security concerns and Bitcoin’s price fluctuations.

Did you know? Some wallets now offer decoy wallets that use different PINs. This feature allows users to display a smaller balance under duress, adding a layer of protection against both physical coercion and surveillance-based attacks.

Why the assets were spread across 71 addresses

The claim states that the Bitcoin was distributed across 71 wallet addresses.

This step carries several implications:

Advertisement
  • It makes tracking and recovery more difficult.

  • It avoids drawing attention to a single large transfer.

  • It fragments the holdings, which can delay legal and investigative efforts.

Although the blockchain’s transparency allows movements to be traced, spreading the funds adds layers of complexity and time to any recovery process.

The dusting attack concern

The claimant also expressed concern about a possible dusting attack on the addresses involved.

Dusting refers to sending tiny amounts of crypto to wallets in order to:

  • Monitor subsequent activity

  • Link addresses to real identities

  • Identify valuable targets for future attacks

If wallet addresses become public, they can attract additional scrutiny, even if no further activity occurs.

Advertisement

Why this matter extends beyond a single conflict

On one hand, this case remains a private legal dispute. On the other, it serves as a case study in the broader risks of crypto custody.

It demonstrates that:

  • Hardware wallets limit digital threats, yet leave human factors untouched.

  • Threats from those close to the owner can outweigh those from outside attackers.

  • Exposure of the seed phrase can result in a complete loss of control.

Above all, this shows that crypto security involves far more than just devices; it relies heavily on environment, conduct, trust and relationships.

Security lessons from the case

This example reinforces several straightforward guidelines:

Advertisement
  • Keep the seed phrase completely hidden from cameras, phones and connected devices.

  • Avoid storing recovery information in places that others can access.

  • Separate personal identity from wallet control whenever possible.

  • Use multiple layers of protection for large holdings.

More sophisticated arrangements may include additional passphrases, split backups or multisignature setups. Each of these methods is designed to reduce reliance on a single vulnerable element.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

White House Review Greenlights Proposal for Crypto in 401(k) Plans

Published

on

White House Review Greenlights Proposal for Crypto in 401(k) Plans

The White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has completed its review of a Department of Labor (DOL) proposal that could reshape how 401(k) fiduciaries evaluate alternative assets, including digital-asset exposure.

The OIRA’s website shows the review concluded on March 24, with the action marked “consistent with change” and the proposal classified as “economically significant.” The DOL is now expected to publish the proposed rule for a standard 60-day public comment period, which is usually followed by revisions and the issuing of a final rule.

The proposal follows President Donald Trump’s Aug. 7, 2025, executive order directing federal agencies to expand access to alternative assets in 401(k) plans, including exposure to digital assets through certain investment vehicles.

The order directed the DOL to reevaluate restrictions around alternative assets in defined-contribution plans, including digital assets, private equity and real estate. It also called for inter-agency collaboration between the US Treasury Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission on supporting rule changes.

Advertisement

The completed review clears an interagency hurdle for a proposal that could widen the path for alternative assets in US defined-contribution retirement plans.

Crypto-linked exposure moves closer to 401(k) market

On May 28, 2025, the DOL rescinded a 2022 compliance release that urged fiduciaries to be “extremely cautious” when considering crypto for 401(k) retirement plans, signaling a broader shift in the federal government’s stance toward retirement-plan exposure to digital assets. 

White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs concluded its review of the Department of Labor’s rule on alternative investments in retirement plans. Source: Reginfo.gov

The US retirement market reached a record $48.1 trillion in financial assets on September 30, 2025, according to a report by the Investment Company Institute (ICI).

US retirement market assets by quarter, in USD trillion. Source: ICI.org 

Indiana advances crypto retirement access

Other US states have launched their own legal initiatives to make digital assets a retirement plan asset.

Related: Major Australian pension fund mulls crypto offerings amid growing demand

On Feb. 25, Indiana lawmakers passed a bill that would require certain state retirement and savings plans to offer a self-directed brokerage option with at least one crypto investment option by July 1, 2027.

Advertisement

The bill would allow Indiana citizens to hold Bitcoin (BTC) and digital assets as part of their retirement plans for the first time. 

Magazine: Quitting Trump’s top crypto job wasn’t easy: Bo Hines