Key Takeaways

• Apple is petitioning the Trump administration for permission to source memory chips from CXMT, a Chinese semiconductor company designated on the Pentagon’s Chinese Military Company list.
• The tech giant implemented a 20% price increase on MacBook and iPad products driven by escalating memory component costs, prompting the search for alternative suppliers.
• CXMT specializes in standard DRAM production but lacks capabilities in high-bandwidth memory (HBM), the advanced chip category fueling Micron’s artificial intelligence market expansion.
• Shares of Micron (MU) declined 6.69% following the disclosure, though market analysts indicate minimal competitive risk to Micron’s core business.
• Legislative resistance poses a significant obstacle, as Apple’s prior effort to partner with Chinese manufacturer YMTC in 2022 triggered swift congressional opposition.

Apple has initiated discussions with United States government officials seeking authorization to procure memory chips from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), a Chinese semiconductor producer appearing on the Pentagon’s Chinese Military Company designation list, a Financial Times report revealed Friday.

Apple Inc., AAPL

AAPL stock traded up 3.14% to $283.78 during the reporting period. Micron (MU) dropped 6.69% following the revelation.

Apple has been requesting guarantees from the Commerce Department alongside other administration representatives that procuring components from CXMT wouldn’t result in subsequent restrictions or sanctions. Although purchasing chips from CXMT isn’t explicitly prohibited, proceeding without official approval could subject Apple to political backlash and reputation damage.

This initiative follows Apple’s announcement of price increases across multiple MacBook and iPad configurations by approximately 20%. CEO Tim Cook explained the company could no longer offset the climbing cost of components, especially memory. That disclosure triggered AAPL’s steepest single-day decline in over twelve months.

DRAM pricing has skyrocketed in recent years, propelled by constrained supply and massive demand from AI infrastructure expansion. Apple, representing the world’s largest memory purchaser, now aims to diversify its component sourcing to reduce these expenses.

Understanding CXMT’s Product Portfolio

CXMT manufactures traditional DRAM products — DDR5 for personal computers and servers, LPDDR5X for mobile devices, and enterprise memory solutions. Notably absent from its product lineup is high-bandwidth memory (HBM), the specialized chip driving Nvidia’s AI accelerators and the data infrastructure supporting the ongoing AI investment surge.

This distinction matters significantly for Micron shareholders. HBM represents where Micron’s profit margins and revenue expansion are concentrated. CXMT currently operates outside that segment. If Apple secures approval and begins purchasing from CXMT, Micron’s HBM operations would remain untouched.

Micron, Samsung, and SK Hynix manufacture HBM. CXMT does not.

Apple Contributed to the Supply Crisis It Now Seeks to Escape

The situation contains notable irony. Throughout the previous memory market downturn, Apple leveraged its enormous buying influence to force suppliers like Micron toward bottom-tier pricing. Micron’s Chief Business Officer Sumit Sadana openly criticized Apple’s approach as “not constructive,” noting it discouraged investment in additional manufacturing infrastructure.

Suppliers postponed or abandoned expansion initiatives. Subsequently AI demand emerged, leaving the market without capacity to react swiftly. The scarcity and inflated pricing Apple currently confronts stem partially from that previous cost pressure campaign.

Apple attempted a comparable strategy in 2022, exploring procurement from another blacklisted Chinese company, YMTC. Congressional members immediately cautioned the company against proceeding, referencing national security implications. CXMT encounters identical scrutiny, leaving uncertainty whether the White House would endorse the petition.

CXMT recently obtained authorization to pursue a public listing on the Shanghai stock exchange and has been scaling production with financial support from the Chinese government.

Samsung Electronics declined 5.30% and SK Hynix tumbled 8.36% on the disclosure.

Cardano wallet SecondFi says it has identified a recovery pathway for users affected by a Tuesday exploit and expects to begin returning assets in roughly two weeks. The plan follows forensic work, security reviews, and additional testing to ensure the process can safely operate across the wallet states involved in the incident.

In an update shared on Saturday, Phillip Pon, CEO of SecondFi developer Emurgo, said the company completed its forensic investigation and “established a recovery pathway” for affected users. Pon added that the coming week would be used to build the solution, followed by another week devoted to testing before any assets are returned.

Key takeaways

• SecondFi says recovery should start in about two weeks after building and testing a new solution.
• The affected incident was traced to an address-level issue in SecondFi’s Cardano web wallet generation software that exposed private keys.
• SecondFi transferred approximately 129 million ADA secured via emergency measures to an independent third-party custodian while verification and recovery are pending.
• Users are warned not to migrate funds or follow instructions outside SecondFi’s official guidance, as this could complicate safe returns.
• SecondFi also cautioned that scammers are impersonating the wallet and soliciting private keys, seed phrases, and other access details.

Forensics complete; recovery build then testing

SecondFi’s recovery roadmap is centered on work Pon said has already been completed: forensic investigations and the establishment of a recovery pathway tailored to the wallet conditions created by the exploit. Pon indicated that the company’s next step is engineering the recovery mechanism, with a dedicated testing phase immediately afterward.

Importantly, Pon urged users to avoid moving assets or taking actions outside SecondFi’s official instructions while the recovery process is prepared. He said the recovery approach is designed around existing wallet states, and independent user actions could introduce variables that make a secure return of funds harder to complete.

What the Tuesday breach involved

SecondFi previously disclosed the security breach on Tuesday, reporting that it affected approximately 16 million ADA, worth about $2.4 million at the time, across 374 addresses. According to the wallet’s earlier reporting, the incident was traced to an address-level issue tied to SecondFi’s Cardano web wallet generation software, which exposed users’ private keys.

Separate from the impact on those exposed addresses, SecondFi said it secured roughly 129 million ADA through emergency measures. The company then moved those funds to an independent third-party custodian, where they will remain until SecondFi completes verification and recovery.

As of the Saturday update, SecondFi has not published a full post-mortem describing the vulnerability in detail or outlining precisely how the exploit was carried out.

SecondFi pushes back against recovery-related scams

Alongside the recovery timeline, SecondFi warned that malicious actors are spreading fraudulent messages while its recovery effort is underway. The wallet emphasized that no recovery actions requiring user participation have begun.

SecondFi said it will never ask users for private keys, seed phrases, wallet credentials, or direct wallet access. It urged users to treat any messages instructing them to submit wallet information, migrate assets, or take immediate steps outside verified communication channels as scams.

For users who need help, SecondFi directed them to submit a ticket through its official support portal while the recovery process is still being built and tested.

Why the timeline and custody details matter

For affected users, the most practical element of Saturday’s update is the sequencing: SecondFi is not requesting immediate user action, and it is framing the recovery work around wallet states that already exist from the time of the incident. That matters because ad hoc user behavior—such as moving funds or switching wallet setups during a recovery window—can create mismatches between what a recovery solution expects and what is actually on-chain.

The custodian step also signals that SecondFi is treating the recovered funds as subject to verification before release. While this does not eliminate uncertainty for users whose keys were exposed, it does provide an explicit holding point that, in principle, can reduce the risk of funds being moved without a defined recovery process.

Readers should watch for SecondFi’s testing milestones and any further technical disclosures about what went wrong, as the company has not yet released a comprehensive post-mortem. In the meantime, the practical priority remains clear: follow only verified SecondFi guidance and ignore any unsolicited messages demanding wallet access or recovery “assistance.”

Hyperliquid traded near $63 on June 26 after pulling back from its all-time high of $76.70 earlier this month. 

According to crypto.news data, the token is down over the past week, but it still holds a large gain over the past year.

The latest Hyperliquid price data shows HYPE trading between $59.48 and $65.17 over the past 24 hours. The token holds a top-10 market rank, with a market cap above $14b and fully diluted value above $60b.

HYPE’s recent move looks like a consolidation phase after a sharp rally from the low $30s in March. Price has cooled near $63, but the $60 area remains the main short-term support zone.

A clean break below $60 would put the next support area near $55-$58 back in focus. A move above $65 would show early strength, while a close above $70 would give bulls a stronger case for a retest of the recent high.

Hyperliquid whales keep buying during pullback

Whale activity remains one of the stronger parts of the HYPE setup. According to Lookonchain, a newly created wallet withdrew 222,493 HYPE, worth about $14.41m, from Coinbase Prime. Another whale received 44,986 HYPE, worth about $2.87m, from FalconX.

Those transfers do not prove long-term holding, but they show large buyers are still active during the pullback. Traders often watch Coinbase Prime and FalconX flows because they can reflect institutional or high-net-worth activity.

Derivatives data also shows active trading. CoinGlass data shows HYPE volume rose 29.79% to $4.59b, while open interest slipped 1.15% to $2.52b. Options open interest rose 10.62%, but options volume fell sharply, showing that most activity remains in spot and perpetual futures.

As previously reported, HYPE rallied more than 40% in one week in May as derivatives activity, ETF demand and protocol buybacks supported the move. The current pullback is testing whether that demand can keep absorbing profit-taking.

Multicoin target lifts long-term debate

Multicoin Capital has published a bullish valuation report on HYPE. In the full analysis, the firm said HYPE is now one of the largest positions in its liquid fund and that it has been accumulating since February.

Advertisement

People underestimate how big Hyperliquid can become.

The crypto space is accustomed to projects not having strong traditional metrics (users, revenue/fees accruing to token holders, etc). So, everyone’s instinct is to size up how big something can be based on relative market cap… https://t.co/3uZtdBYN5E

— Hunter Horsley (@HHorsley) June 26, 2026

The firm said Hyperliquid generated about $873m in revenue across roughly $2.9t in trading volume in 2025. It also said the platform grew from about 301,000 to 923,000 users and ended the year with about $6b in open interest.

Multicoin argued that Hyperliquid is taking share from centralized exchanges. It said monthly perpetuals volume is now about 17% of Binance’s level, while open interest has reached about 21% of Binance’s level.

Advertisement

The firm also pointed to HIP-3, HIP-4, portfolio margining, prediction markets, tokenized assets and HyperEVM growth as future drivers. 

“We believe Hyperliquid is becoming the everything exchange,” it said.

As crypto.news reported, Multicoin backed a $319 HYPE target by 2028 under its base case. The firm also listed risks, including regulation, governance, competition, bad debt and technical pressure.

Technical signals show cooling momentum

The HYPE/USDT daily chart still shows a broader uptrend from March. Price climbed from the low $30s to above $70 before pulling back. That structure keeps the larger trend constructive, but short-term momentum has cooled.

The Accumulation/Distribution indicator is near 2.32m. It remains elevated after rising sharply earlier in June, which suggests buying pressure improved during the rally. The line has flattened recently, showing that accumulation is no longer accelerating.

Advertisement

The Aroon Oscillator is positive near 28.57. That keeps the short-term trend bias slightly bullish, but the reading has weakened from stronger levels. This means the uptrend remains alive but has lost some speed.

In a previous article, crypto.news discussed HYPE’s double-top risk after its pullback from the all-time high. That pattern put the $65 and $62 areas in focus. Price is now trading near that same zone.

Previously, crypto.news exploredwhether HYPE can reach $100 in 2026. That scenario depends on buybacks, volume growth, token unlocks and wider market strength.

For now, HYPE remains in a mixed setup. Whales are buying, Multicoin has issued a strong long-term case, and the broader trend still holds above $60. But momentum has cooled, and bulls need a move back above $65-$70 to confirm that the next upside phase is starting.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Bet365 and 888casino sit among the most recognized names in online betting, with decades of operation behind each of them. The space they helped shape, though, keeps evolving — and lately, players comparing the veterans have started looking past them too. ZunaBet, which launched in 2026, is one of the names appearing more often in those side-by-side conversations as the crypto-first model continues to gain ground.

What follows is a look at how the established names compare today, and why ZunaBet is drawing attention as players widen the field.

The Veterans of the Space

Bet365 has been running since 2000. Built from the UK and now a global brand, it brings sportsbook, casino, poker, and bingo under one account. Funding moves through cards, bank transfers, and e-wallets, and the operator carries licenses in every region it serves.

888casino goes back even further, to 1997. As one of the first online casinos to launch, it operates under the 888 Holdings umbrella and continues to hold steady positions in European regulated markets and parts of North America. The library leans on slots, table games, and live dealer rooms. Like Bet365, it works on fiat banking under regional licensing.

Both deliver the dependability that long-standing brands tend to provide. Both also work within constraints baked into that model — fiat-only banking, withdrawal speeds tied to chosen methods, libraries smaller than what global crypto brands carry, and loyalty programs that stay close to long-running structures.

ZunaBet Enters the Comparison

ZunaBet went live in 2026 under Strathvale Group Ltd with an Anjouan gaming license. The defining difference between it and the established names is structural. Crypto wasn’t introduced later — the platform was built around it from the start.

The game catalogue reaches more than 11,000 titles from over 60 providers, including Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Yggdrasil, BGaming, and Evolution. That ranks it among the larger crypto-focused libraries on the market and pushes past what Bet365 and 888casino offer in most of their licensed regions. Slots, table games, and live dealer rooms all share a single account.

The sportsbook is built into the platform too. Football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and the other major sports sit alongside CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant. Virtual sports and combat sports finish the menu. That makes ZunaBet a hybrid in the same category as Bet365, with wider market coverage under one roof.

How the Payment Models Compare

The operating gap shows up most clearly in banking. Bet365 and 888casino move money through traditional rails. The cost is processing windows, possible holds, and withdrawal speeds that depend on which method players chose.

ZunaBet’s payment stack is entirely crypto. More than 20 currencies are supported, covering Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT across multiple chains, Solana, Dogecoin, Cardano, and XRP. No platform fees apply, and withdrawals settle fast. For players already comfortable with crypto, the experience cuts out the slower elements that come with banking.

Reach matters here too. Crypto-first operators aren’t tied to the same region-by-region licensing requirements that govern fiat brands. ZunaBet’s full setup is available across many regions where older brands face restrictions. For players already moving in digital, crypto-friendly contexts, that aligns with how they expect modern platforms to work.

Welcome Bonuses Compared

Bet365 and 888casino structure welcome offers by region. Deposit matches or smaller new-player bonuses are typical, with wagering requirements that need close reading on the casino side.

ZunaBet’s welcome package goes up to $5,000 plus 75 free spins, spread across three deposits. The first matches 100% up to $2,000 plus 25 spins. The second adds 50% up to $1,500 plus 25 spins. The third returns to 100% up to $1,500 plus another 25 spins. Marketed as a 250% bonus across three deposits, it gives new players more depth to explore the platform than a single-deposit bonus offers.

Loyalty: Different Approaches

Bet365 takes a low-key approach to loyalty, with personalised offers reaching player accounts based on activity rather than a structured tier system. 888casino runs a more traditional VIP setup with points, free spins, and elevated promos at higher tiers. Both work, but both stay close to the standard loyalty card format.

ZunaBet changes the structure. The program runs on a dragon evolution theme, with a mascot called Zuno guiding players through six tiers. Squire opens at 1% rakeback, then Warden at 2%, Champion at 4%, Divine at 5%, Knight at 10%, and Ultimate at the top with 20% rakeback.

Higher tiers unlock more than rakeback. Tier-based free spins reach up to 1,000 spins, with VIP club access and double wheel spins layered through the journey. The whole format feels closer to progressing through a game than working through a points card. For players already familiar with that kind of mechanic, it changes the feel of regular play.

Why Players Are Looking at ZunaBet

Bet365 and 888casino remain dependable for players who value regulation and a long track record. Neither brand is in any danger of losing its place. But the bar for what an online betting platform should deliver keeps moving. Fast withdrawals, deep libraries, and engaging loyalty mechanics are now expected as standard rather than upsells.

ZunaBet was designed around those expectations from day one. The crypto-first core delivers quick payments and low fees. The library reaches beyond what most established brands carry. The sportsbook integrates traditional sports and esports together. The dragon loyalty program adds direction and progression to regular play.

For players who want speed, variety, and a more current feel, ZunaBet ranks among the more interesting platforms to track right now. It’s still in its early growth phase, but the direction is clear. A new generation of players treats crypto support, gamified rewards, and global access as starting points rather than features that need to be requested.

Bet365 and 888casino built the online betting world that exists today. ZunaBet is one of the platforms shaping what comes next — and the players who notice early are the ones getting the first look.

Cardano wallet provider SecondFi says it has built a recovery route for users impacted by a Tuesday exploit that exposed private keys for a portion of its customer base. In an update shared Saturday, SecondFi’s developer Emurgo indicated that asset returns should begin after completion of security testing and internal verification, with the first payouts expected in roughly two weeks.

The company’s CEO, Phillip Pon, said Emurgo finished forensic investigations and designed the process around SecondFi’s existing wallet states—an approach Pon warned users not to disrupt by moving funds independently or following instructions from unofficial sources.

Key takeaways

• SecondFi/Emurgo completed forensics and mapped a recovery pathway for affected users after Tuesday’s Cardano wallet exploit.
• Emurgo expects to start returning assets in about two weeks, after a week building the solution and a subsequent week of testing.
• SecondFi previously linked the incident to an address-level problem in its Cardano web wallet generation software that exposed private keys.
• The wallet provider says it is coordinating recovery without requiring user participation for key handling, and it is warning users about scams that may imitate official guidance.
• SecondFi secured a portion of funds (reported as 129 million ADA) via emergency measures and moved them to an independent third-party custodian for verification.

Recovery plan targets affected users after forensics

According to a Saturday statement from Emurgo CEO Phillip Pon posted on X, SecondFi has reached the stage of producing a recovery solution after finishing forensic work and establishing a pathway intended to safely return assets.

Pon said the immediate focus is the construction phase over the coming week, followed by an additional week of testing and security review before withdrawals or refunds begin. While the company has not published a full technical explanation of the exploit mechanics, its plan is designed to restore user assets in a controlled manner rather than through ad hoc user action.

Crucially, Pon urged users not to migrate assets or take steps outside official instructions during the recovery period. He characterized the workflow as dependent on the wallet states already recorded at the time of the incident, warning that independent actions could complicate efforts to securely reconcile and return funds.

What the Tuesday breach involved

SecondFi disclosed the breach earlier in the week, stating that the incident affected approximately 16 million ADA across 374 addresses. At the time of disclosure, SecondFi estimated the value at about $2.4 million.

In its initial reporting, SecondFi attributed the underlying cause to an address-level issue within its Cardano web wallet generation software. The company said this issue resulted in private keys being exposed for affected users.

Beyond identifying the exposure, SecondFi also said it took emergency measures to secure about 129 million ADA. Those funds were reportedly transferred to an independent third-party custodian and will remain there until the verification and recovery process is fully complete. The separation between the custodied funds and the ongoing recovery workflow underscores the company’s emphasis on verification before any broad asset return.

Scam warnings while recovery is still underway

As SecondFi works toward the next steps of its recovery program, it says scammers are trying to take advantage of the situation. In a separate Saturday update, SecondFi warned that malicious actors have been circulating fraudulent messages impersonating the wallet during the recovery window.

The company said no recovery actions requiring user participation have started. It also reiterated that SecondFi will not ask users for private keys, seed phrases, wallet credentials, or direct wallet access.

SecondFi further cautioned that any message instructing users to submit sensitive wallet information, migrate assets, or act immediately outside of its verified communication channels should be treated as fraudulent. For users seeking help, the company advised submitting a ticket through its official support portal while the recovery process continues.

Why the “two-week” timeline and “no user action” rule matter

The most practical part of SecondFi’s update for impacted users is the operational timeline. By stating that building and testing will consume about two weeks in total before asset returns begin, Emurgo is effectively communicating that this is not a one-day rollback or an instant unlock—rather, it is a staged process with security reviews intended to reduce the risk of further loss.

Just as important is the instruction to avoid migrating funds on one’s own. For wallet incidents, independent user actions can sometimes reduce the amount of verifiable data available to an operator or complicate address-level reconciliation. SecondFi’s stated approach—designing recovery around “existing wallet states”—signals that its engineers are working from a known set of conditions and that changing balances or moving assets independently could create mismatches between what is stored in the wallet records and what needs to be restored.

At the same time, the company’s scam warnings highlight the danger of acting on unofficial guidance. If users were to follow instructions from imposters—especially those asking for seed phrases or direct access—the consequences could compound the original exploit. SecondFi’s emphasis on never requesting private keys or credentials is therefore central to the security posture during recovery.

Still, some key uncertainties remain for the broader community. SecondFi has not published a comprehensive post-mortem that details the full vulnerability or how attackers executed the exploit. Until more technical information is shared, investors and users will likely focus on whether the scheduled testing and review periods end on time and whether asset returns proceed smoothly for all affected addresses.

For users affected by the Tuesday incident, the next watch points are whether SecondFi begins asset returns on the expected schedule and whether the company continues to provide clear, verified updates while discouraging any off-platform recovery attempts. For the wider ecosystem, the incident also serves as a reminder of how web wallet key-generation and address-level logic can become high-risk components—and why disciplined verification during recovery can be as important as the initial patch.

CZ acknowledged that there is a gambling component to prediction markets, but he said that is also true in other financial markets.

“With any financial instrument, there’s always some speculators,” he said. “The speculators actually provide the liquidity, so it’s good that you have that speculation.”

Policy futures

The U.S.’s potential signature crypto policy legislation — the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (known as the Clarity Act) — may become a law by the end of the year if lawmakers can work out some remaining issues, including an ethics provision for government officials, chiefly the president.

But he said the Clarity Act and other individual bills are “sort of small, tactical things, which are really important, but those are not gonna impact the growth of crypto longer-term.”

Even if the Clarity Act does not become law this year, CZ said he expected the U.S. would continue to take a leading role in crypto regulation, adding that other countries were continuing to introduce their own regulations governing digital assets.

The U.S. would likely still compete with other countries to introduce rules, and it already has the stablecoin-focused Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, he said.

“I, of course, hope to see it get passed, and then every other country will probably copy it to some extent,” he said. “If it gets delayed … other countries may move forward first.”

Ethereum has extended its weekly decline as a multi-billion-dollar options expiry, institutional selling, and a hawkish Federal Reserve outlook have driven the token back toward its key $1,500 support.

According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) fell about 7% to an intraday low of $1,517 on June 26 before stabilizing around $1,550 at press time. The asset has dropped nearly 14.4% from its June 22 high of $1,773.

The selloff gathered pace after Ethereum lost its 200-day moving average near $1,668, triggering a wave of leveraged long liquidations.

Meanwhile, U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded roughly $260 million in net outflows this week, a sharp jump from the previous weeks, as institutional investors reduced exposure ahead of expectations for three Federal Reserve rate hikes this year.

Additional pressure emerged after the Ethereum Foundation announced a 20% workforce reduction and a 40% cut to its operating budget. The restructuring raised fresh questions about the network’s development pace and funding outlook while traders were already navigating heightened volatility around the $11 billion options expiry.

Ethereum’s $1,500 support has become the market’s main test

Ethereum’s daily chart shows that the token has broken below the $1,805 support area, turning a former demand zone into overhead resistance. The next major support sits near $1,414, while the current rebound attempt has remained limited after buyers defended the $1,500–$1,520 region.

On the four-hour chart, Ethereum has been moving inside a descending channel since its June 15 peak near $1,849. The Fib retracement map places immediate resistance near $1,584, followed by $1,641, $1,681, and $1,720. A stronger recovery would need a clean move above $1,750, which also matches a key level watched by traders.

According to analyst Ted Pillows, Ethereum’s momentum remains weak after retesting the lows.

“ETH tapped the lows again. The momentum is still weak due to market correction. But if Ethereum manages to reclaim the $1,750 level from here, we could see a relief rally next month.”

Momentum indicators remain soft. The four-hour RSI is near 35, keeping Ethereum close to oversold territory without confirming a strong reversal. The MACD remains below the zero line, although its histogram has started to flatten, showing that bearish pressure has slowed after the sharp drop.

The daily Aroon setup still favors sellers. Aroon Down is at 100%, while Aroon Up sits near 21%, showing that Ethereum recently printed fresh lows while upside momentum remains limited. The daily MACD also remains negative, with both signal lines deep below zero.

Liquidation clusters keep pressure on both sides of the trade

CoinGlass’ three-day liquidation heatmap shows heavy leverage around $1,590 to $1,610 and a larger cluster near $1,660. If Ethereum rebounds through those zones, short liquidations could fuel a move toward $1,700 and then $1,750.

Below the spot price, the heatmap shows liquidation interest around $1,520 and $1,500 levels. A break under that area would expose the $1,464–$1,414 region, where the daily chart shows the next major support band.

Whale positioning has also weakened. CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost noted that three large Ethereum holder groups are now underwater, with unrealized profit ratios at -0.26 for 1,000–10,000 ETH holders, -0.21 for 10,000–100,000 ETH holders, and -0.05 for wallets holding more than 100,000 ETH.

According to Darkfost, this condition has not appeared since 2019, as even the largest Ethereum whales stayed in profit during the 2022 bear market. The analyst added that Ethereum has remained “fairly resilient” despite the pressure, as similar whale stress periods have historically appeared near major bottom zones.

Downside risks remain high if Ethereum loses the $1,500 area with volume. A daily close below that level would weaken the double-bottom setup and increase the risk of a deeper move toward $1,414. A hawkish Federal Reserve, stronger U.S. dollar, rising Treasury yields, and continued ETF outflows would add pressure if institutional demand fails to recover.

The bullish invalidation level is now clear. Ethereum needs to reclaim $1,750 and then $1,805 to prove that the latest decline was a liquidity-driven flush rather than the start of another breakdown. Until then, the market remains trapped between forced selling below $1,600 and short-covering risk above $1,660.

The CLARITY Act has the votes and the momentum to become law, having cleared the House and a key Senate committee. It is stuck anyway. The deepest reason is not crypto skepticism but a fight over the president’s own crypto empire, estimated in the billions, and whether the rules should restrain it.

The CLARITY Act is the bill the American crypto industry has wanted for years, the one that would finally settle how digital assets are regulated in the U.S., and by the ordinary logic of legislation it should be on a path to becoming law.

It passed the House of Representatives with bipartisan support, cleared the Senate Banking Committee on a 15-to-9 vote, and was placed on the Senate calendar, formally eligible for a floor vote. The industry is mobilized behind it, with hundreds of companies urging passage, and analysts have spent the year handicapping when, not whether, it would be signed.

And yet it is stuck.

The reason it is stuck has surprisingly little to do with crypto policy itself, on which a workable consensus largely exists, and a great deal to do with something the bill’s authors never intended it to be about: the president’s own crypto business.

President Trump and his family hold crypto interests estimated in the billions of dollars, and the question of whether a law regulating crypto should also restrain officials who profit from it has become the obstacle that crypto policy alone never was.