The EU’s MiCA regime has entered its first true enforcement stretch now that the regulation’s transition period has ended. Crypto-asset service providers that were operating under that grace window but have not obtained MiCA authorization can no longer legally serve clients in the European Union, pushing many firms toward either rapid compliance or an orderly wind-down.

Industry lawyers and executives told Cointelegraph that the initial challenge won’t just be understanding the rules—it will be how consistently national regulators apply the bloc’s “single rulebook.” Although MiCA harmonizes the framework, day-to-day supervision is still handled by national competent authorities, and their enforcement posture may differ at first.

Key takeaways

• The MiCA transition deadline has passed, meaning unauthorized crypto companies are now exposed to enforcement action and legal consequences across the EU.
• Compliance costs can be substantial—often hundreds of thousands of euros—but operating without authorization carries higher regulatory and financial risk.
• National regulators (NCAs) conduct authorization and day-to-day supervision, while ESMA coordinates and helps drive supervisory consistency.
• Early enforcement may not look identical in every member state due to differences in resources and priorities, creating potential for regulatory divergence.
• Penalties for MiCA violations can be severe, including multimillion-euro fines and turnover-based calculations proposed by EU bodies.

From transition to enforcement: what changes on July 1

MiCA’s transition period was designed to give the industry time to adapt to a new licensing and compliance framework. With that window closed, the practical effect is immediate: crypto firms without MiCA authorization should stop serving EU clients, and regulators are expected to treat continued activity as non-compliant.

Cointelegraph reported that executives and lawyers view this as MiCA’s first major enforcement test—an inflection point where regulators begin applying the EU crypto rulebook not just on paper, but through formal supervision and penalties.

What MiCA compliance costs can look like—and why firms may still pay

While MiCA compliance can be expensive, experts argue it is often less costly than the alternative. Legal and compliance implementation can range from several hundred thousand euros to multi-million-euro budgets depending on a firm’s size and the services it provides.

According to Nicola Massella, partner at Legal & Resilience, many cryptocurrency companies face MiCA implementation costs estimated around €350,000 to €600,000. Brickken CEO Edwin Mata told Cointelegraph that costs can rise to €2 million depending on a company’s business model and readiness.

Penalty exposure can also start at a high floor. Eckehard Stolz, managing director of Amina EU, said MiCA penalties begin at €5 million or 5% of annual turnover for certain violations. Separately, Massella said the European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed, on June 26, increasing penalties under certain regulatory regimes—at levels that could reach up to 12.5% of annual turnover for some stablecoin-related breaches. The EBA’s consultation is linked in Cointelegraph’s reporting.

For investors and operators, the key takeaway is that MiCA is not only a licensing hurdle; it is also a regime where financial penalties are calibrated enough to make continued unauthorized activity a board-level risk rather than a “wait and see” option.

How MiCA is supervised: ESMA coordination, NCAs enforcement, EBA stablecoin oversight

MiCA establishes a single set of rules across the EU, but its enforcement relies on a distributed supervisory structure. National competent authorities (NCAs) authorize, supervise, and enforce rules for crypto-asset service providers at the local level.

At the EU level, ESMA coordinates supervision across member states and maintains a public register of authorized crypto-asset service providers. In addition, the EBA directly oversees significant stablecoin issuers.

In comments shared with Cointelegraph, Ivo Grlica, founder of GrlicaLaw and G LAB Advisors, said ESMA’s coordination role is especially important to avoid regulatory arbitrage between member states. He also noted that while NCAs are the first line of enforcement, the consequences of underlying harmful conduct can extend beyond supervision into national courts and even criminal-law systems.

Early enforcement is expected to be uneven—at least initially

Even with a harmonized rulebook, enforcement intensity may vary in the short term. Stolz told Cointelegraph that ESMA has made clear it expects NCAs to act against unauthorized providers from July 1, but how aggressively each regulator moves will depend on local resourcing and supervisory priorities.

Peter Bidewell, vice president of institutional product adoption at Parfin, warned that differences in supervisory approaches could create opportunities for regulatory arbitrage—undermining MiCA’s goal of consistent application across the EU.

Grlica, however, suggested that enforcement could become more systematic over time as regulators identify unauthorized providers and share information across member states. The longer-term implication is that companies considering delay may face a shrinking window: continued non-compliance could make later authorization harder as regulators develop clearer patterns and intelligence.

Cointelegraph also noted that multiple regulators have already issued public reminders that the transition period ended and that providers without authorization should wind down. Reported examples include notices from authorities in the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Luxembourg, and Italy, with the Czech National Bank also outlining its sanction framework.

Examples of national sanction frameworks and enforcement posture

In the Czech Republic, Cointelegraph said the Czech National Bank stated that the Financial Market Digitization Act gives it authority to impose sanctions for MiCA-related violations. According to the reported details, sanctions can be levied for operating without authorization, unlawful token offerings, and failure to cooperate with supervisors.

The law, as described to Cointelegraph, allows fines up to 118.5 million Czech koruna (about $5.6 million), or 5% of annual turnover if higher, or twice the unlawful benefit obtained, whichever is greater. This matters for market participants because it illustrates how MiCA enforcement may be backed by specific domestic legal tools and maximum penalty thresholds.

Cointelegraph contacted France’s Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the Netherlands’ Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), and Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) to ask about their planned enforcement approach after the transition deadline. None had responded by the time of publication.

Meanwhile, ESMA’s ongoing work to maintain and update its register of authorized providers has been highlighted in related coverage referenced by Cointelegraph. For firms trying to comply quickly, the register functions as a public signal of who is authorized—and a starting point for counterparties and platforms assessing MiCA status.

Over the coming weeks, companies and investors should watch two things closely: whether NCAs demonstrate consistent escalation against unauthorized providers, and how quickly public compliance information—especially ESMA register updates—filters into business decisions across exchanges, custodians, and other market intermediaries. The legal outcome of continued unauthorized activity may vary at first, but the direction is clear: MiCA’s licensing wall is no longer optional.

Cathie Wood’s ARK Invest has purchased nearly $38.1 million worth of Tesla shares after the electric vehicle maker suffered its sharpest one-day decline in weeks.

According to ARK Invest’s latest daily trading disclosure, the investment firm bought 96,935 shares of Tesla across three of its exchange-traded funds on July 2, taking advantage of the stock’s 7.49% drop during the session. Based on Tesla’s closing price of $393.45, the purchases were valued at roughly $38.14 million.

The largest allocation went to the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK), which added 69,723 Tesla shares worth about $27.44 million. The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) acquired shares valued at around $6.91 million, while the ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) bought another $3.80 million. ARK’s trading report showed no Tesla purchases for the ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ).

ARK continues building exposure to Elon Musk companies

The latest Tesla purchase came a week after ARK Invest disclosed a $32.5 million investment in privately held SpaceX, another company led by Elon Musk. ARK previously noted that the latest transaction had lifted SpaceX into the list of larger holdings across several of its funds, further increasing its exposure to Musk-led businesses.

Advertisement

Tesla shares ended Thursday at $393.45 after falling 7.49% during the session, making the latest purchase appear to be a buy-the-dip move based on ARK’s disclosed transactions. The filing did not state a reason for the trade.

Wood has recently tied her investment outlook to macroeconomic conditions rather than short-term market swings. Speaking last week, she argued that rising geopolitical and economic instability could drive new demand for Bitcoin and other digital assets as investors look for assets that can preserve wealth across borders.

According to Wood, artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies serve different roles in portfolios rather than competing for the same capital. While AI continues attracting investment because of its growth prospects, she described Bitcoin as an “insurance policy” that becomes more valuable when confidence in traditional financial systems weakens. She also said capital leaving politically and economically unstable countries could “light another fire” under Bitcoin and the digital asset market.

Advertisement

Bullish joins ARK’s latest buying activity

Alongside Tesla, ARK also expanded its position in crypto-focused stock Bullish (NASDAQ: BLSH), according to the same trading report. The firm purchased 77,251 Bullish shares through ARKK and another 9,732 shares through ARKW, bringing the day’s total acquisition to 86,983 shares.

Bullish closed 1.35% higher at $25.57, putting the value of the latest purchase at roughly $2.22 million.

A day earlier, Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor highlighted strong derivatives activity surrounding his own company. As crypto.news reported, Saylor shared data showing Strategy’s open interest-to-market capitalization ratio stood at nearly 72%, a level he compared with other large technology companies, including Tesla, to argue that Strategy commands stronger participation in the derivatives market.

Advertisement

Stake.com and Bet365 represent two sides of online betting that rarely overlap. Stake.com has built a strong following in the crypto space, while Bet365 sits at the top of the long-established fiat-based market. Each operates with a different audience, a different banking approach, and a different regulatory profile. Around both of them, though, a new wave of crypto-first operators is starting to make a real mark. ZunaBet — live since 2026 — is one of the names raising its profile in that emerging group.

What follows looks at how Stake.com and Bet365 hold up today, and where ZunaBet’s setup is starting to attract notice.

---

Two Brands Defining Different Sides

Stake.com launched in 2017 and quickly became one of the most familiar names in crypto gambling. Built around crypto from day one, the platform supports a wide range of currencies and pairs its casino with a full sportsbook. Sponsorships across UFC and football have brought it mainstream visibility, though it doesn’t operate inside the regulated US market.

Bet365 has been running since 2000, growing from a UK base into one of the largest privately owned betting companies in the world. Sportsbook, casino, poker, and bingo all sit under one account. Banking runs through cards, bank transfers, and e-wallets, with active licensing in every region the operator serves.

Both brands lead in their own areas. Stake.com is at the front of the crypto side; Bet365 leads on the fiat side. Both also carry their own constraints. Bet365 is tied to fiat payments and region-by-region rules. Stake.com is restricted in certain markets and now faces growing competition from newer crypto-first operators.

---

How ZunaBet Joins the Picture

ZunaBet launched in 2026 under Strathvale Group Ltd with an Anjouan gaming license. The clearest separator from the older brands is the design starting point. Crypto sits at the foundation of ZunaBet rather than being added later, and the platform is positioning itself as a fresh take on the crypto-first model with appeal across player types.

The casino library covers more than 11,000 titles from over 60 providers, including Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Yggdrasil, BGaming, and Evolution. That places it among the larger crypto-focused libraries on the market today, and well beyond what Bet365 stocks in most of its licensed regions. Slots, table games, and live dealer streams all run from one account.

The sportsbook completes the platform. Football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and other major sports cover the standard ground, while CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant sit on the esports side. Virtual sports and combat sports fill out the menu. ZunaBet’s hybrid structure lines up with both Stake.com and Bet365.

---

The Banking Divide

The biggest gap between these brands shows up in payments. Bet365 operates mainly on fiat, which brings processing windows, possible holds, and withdrawal speeds shaped by which method the player picked. That works for players who value the familiarity of regulated, banking-based platforms — but speed isn’t its strong suit.

Stake.com and ZunaBet both run on crypto. ZunaBet supports more than 20 currencies, with Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT on multiple chains, Solana, Dogecoin, Cardano, and XRP all in the lineup. No platform fees apply, and withdrawals settle quickly. For players already comfortable with crypto, the workflow removes the friction tied to bank-driven payments.

Geographic reach is the other factor. Crypto-first operators aren’t bound by the region-by-region licensing model fiat brands operate within. ZunaBet’s full platform is accessible in regions Bet365 can’t legally serve. For players already moving in digital, crypto-friendly contexts, that aligns with what they expect from a modern platform.

---

Welcome Offers Side by Side

Bet365 builds welcome offers around region-specific deposit matches or new-player bonuses, with wagering rules that often need close reading. Stake.com runs promotions too, but its welcome offer is lighter than what some crypto-first competitors push — more of the weight sits in reload bonuses and rakeback for active play.

ZunaBet’s welcome package totals up to $5,000 plus 75 free spins across three deposits. The first matches 100% up to $2,000 plus 25 spins. The second adds 50% up to $1,500 plus 25 spins. The third closes with 100% up to $1,500 plus 25 more spins. Marketed as a 250% bonus across three deposits, the structure gives new players more depth and time to explore the platform than a single-deposit format does.

---

Loyalty Programs Compared

Bet365 keeps loyalty quiet, with personalised offers reaching player accounts based on activity rather than a structured tier system. Stake.com runs a strong VIP program built around rakeback, reloads, and milestone bonuses — a setup that’s helped it retain long-term players. Both work, but Bet365 follows the conventional loyalty card layout while Stake.com leans heavily on rakeback as the main hook.

ZunaBet takes a different approach by combining rakeback with gamified progression. The program runs on a dragon evolution theme, with a mascot named Zuno guiding players through six tiers. Squire opens at 1% rakeback, then Warden at 2%, Champion at 4%, Divine at 5%, Knight at 10%, and Ultimate at the top with 20% rakeback.

Tier movement unlocks more than rakeback. Free spins scale with tier — reaching 1,000 spins at the highest level — alongside VIP club access and double wheel spins through the climb. The format reads more like in-game progression than chasing flat rakeback or accumulating points. For players drawn to that kind of mechanic, the system shifts how regular play feels relative to either a standard VIP program or a plain rakeback model.

---

Why ZunaBet’s Profile Keeps Growing

Bet365 remains a solid choice for players who value the security of a long-running, well-regulated brand. Stake.com continues to hold its place as a leading name in crypto casinos. Both have earned their positions. But the expectations players bring to these platforms keep climbing. Quick payments, deep libraries, and engaging loyalty mechanics are turning into starting features rather than premium upgrades.

ZunaBet was designed around those starting features from day one. The crypto-first core delivers fast settlement and minimal fees. The library reaches beyond what most established brands carry. The sportsbook covers traditional sports and esports together. The dragon loyalty program brings direction and progression to regular play.

For players who want speed, variety, and a more current feel, ZunaBet ranks among the more compelling platforms in the market right now. The brand is still in its early growth phase, but the direction is clear. A new generation of players treats crypto support, gamified rewards, and global access as defaults rather than features to ask for.

Stake.com and Bet365 built the online betting world that exists today. ZunaBet is one of the platforms working on what comes next — and the players paying attention now are catching that change early.

Key Takeaways

• Rocket Lab has evolved from a launch provider into a comprehensive space systems company, with the Neutron vehicle representing its next major milestone
• AST SpaceMobile is developing direct-to-smartphone satellite connectivity, partnering with major carriers like AT&T and Verizon
• Planet Labs operates an extensive Earth imaging satellite constellation, monetizing through data subscriptions to enterprise and government clients
• These three firms represent distinct investment theses: launch infrastructure, wireless connectivity, and geospatial intelligence
• Government defense budgets and commercial satellite adoption continue driving sector growth

---

The commercial space industry continues expanding in July 2026, with Rocket Lab, AST SpaceMobile, and Planet Labs emerging as three particularly noteworthy stocks for investor consideration.

Rocket Lab: Vertically Integrated Space Systems Provider

Rocket Lab has successfully transformed from a niche launch provider into a vertically integrated space systems enterprise. Today’s revenue streams span orbital insertion services, satellite production, spacecraft subsystems, mission control software, and defense contracts.

Rocket Lab USA, Inc., RKLB

Strong relationships with NASA and the Department of Defense provide reliable contract flow. The company’s upcoming Neutron launch vehicle represents a strategic expansion into medium-lift reusable rockets, targeting both commercial constellation deployments and national security payloads.

Successful Neutron deployment would significantly expand the company’s addressable market. While share price volatility persists, the diversified business structure provides resilience against individual program delays.

Rocket Lab stands out among publicly traded space companies for its operational breadth and consistent delivery track record.

AST SpaceMobile: Revolutionary Mobile Connectivity Venture

AST SpaceMobile pursues an ambitious vision: creating the first space-based cellular broadband network accessible to ordinary mobile phones without modifications.

AST SpaceMobile, Inc., ASTS

The objective involves eliminating terrestrial coverage gaps globally. Agreements with telecommunications giants including AT&T, Verizon, and Vodafone validate market demand for this capability.

Commercial operations remain in early stages. Deploying a functioning global satellite constellation requires substantial capital investment, complex regulatory navigation, and flawless technical performance.

Significant execution risk exists, but the opportunity is equally substantial. Successful deployment could fundamentally alter global mobile communications access.

Planet Labs: Geospatial Intelligence at Scale

Planet Labs pursues a fundamentally different space business model focused on information rather than connectivity or transportation.

Planet Labs PBC, PL

The company maintains one of Earth’s largest commercial Earth observation satellite networks, generating daily global imagery. This data feeds subscription-based services sold to government agencies, defense organizations, insurance companies, agricultural enterprises, and environmental monitoring groups.

Subscription-based revenue provides greater predictability compared to transactional launch businesses. Satellite imagery demand continues expanding as organizations increasingly rely on geospatial intelligence for strategic decision-making.

While revenue expansion has proceeded more gradually than some analysts anticipated, the growing customer roster and recurring revenue structure establish solid long-term fundamentals.

Investment Perspective

These three companies represent distinct segments within the broader space economy. Rocket Lab provides launch capabilities and space infrastructure. AST SpaceMobile targets global wireless connectivity gaps. Planet Labs monetizes Earth observation intelligence.

The commercial space sector benefits from increasing government expenditure, defense modernization priorities, and expanding commercial satellite applications. All three securities carry elevated risk profiles relative to traditional equity investments, but each provides unique exposure to an industry experiencing exceptional growth momentum.

Belgian authorities arrested a 19-year-old suspected of being a key figure in a European phishing and money-laundering network that stole more than 500,000 euros ($572,000) using fake government emails and phone calls to trick victims into installing remote-access software.

Authorities detained the suspect in an Airbnb in Antwerp, where a second suspect was also found. The Federal Judicial Police launched the investigation in March 2026, when phishing attacks became a priority in the region, according to a Thursday police report.

The main suspect was brought before an investigating judge, who issued an arrest warrant. The gang used money mules and cash carriers and laundered the proceeds through cryptocurrencies.

The investigation shows that crypto can play multiple roles in phishing operations, including as a means of laundering illicit proceeds.

Phishing dominates crypto security losses

Phishing is also a major threat to cryptocurrency investors, accounting for the majority of the $482 million lost in the first quarter of 2026. Phishing and social engineering attacks accounted for $306 million of those losses, according to Hacken.

Phishing attacks and social engineering scams are a long-standing hurdle for the crypto industry, as attackers exploit human behavior rather than the code of a protocol.

On May 25, onchain analyst “b-block” warned that scammers used Google to deploy malicious phishing ads impersonating decentralized exchange Uniswap, reportedly stealing more than $400,000 from victims.

Data aggregator DeFiLlama said that “fake ads on Google are a common source of phishing attacks.” Crypto cybersecurity group Security Alliance also reported in April that there was a “significant uptick” in phishing activity on Google Search in March.

Related: Phantom Chat under scrutiny after $264K address poisoning loss

Blockchain security company CertiK’s Skynet report also highlighted phishing and social engineering as leading attack vectors for North Korea-linked malicious actors.

DPRK hacking playbook. Source: CertiK

CertiK attributed the 2022 Ronin Bridge exploit that stole $600 million to a spearphishing campaign involving a fake LinkedIn recruiter and a malware-laden PDF.

Magazine: Meet the onchain crypto detectives fighting crime better than the cops

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Crypto influencer Ansem has admitted that he lied while trying to score dogwifhat (WIF) a spot on the Las Vegas Sphere, claiming that it was never a crypto, “just a dog.”

Ansem, real name Zion Thomas, revealed in an interview on Market Bubble that it was incredibly hard to get around the sphere’s anti-crypto policies, and so he tried various measures to keep WIF’s crypto links hidden. 

He said, “So what we were trying to do to get around it, is like, oh no, it’s just a dog with a hat, it’s not a coin. It’s just like a dog.”

Ansem also tried to secure a spot on the sphere via a partnership with a clothing brand that would involve the dog design on their clothing. 

However, he explained, “When we were close to the end, we kept being blown up by crypto people, like ‘yo they scammed, they’re trying to steal the money, they’re not gonna give it back.’”

Read more: WIF fundraiser says Vegas Sphere refunds will start on April Fools

The claims made it hard for Ansem to address the backlash. He said, “We can’t say what exactly we’re trying to do because if we say what exactly we’re trying to do, they’ll know it’s the coin attached to it, and then we won’t be able to do it.”

The money that fuelled the scam accusations was the $700,000 raised from the public to help fund the sphere spot. 

Advertisement

The fundraiser started in March 2024. Decrypt reported in January 2025 that a Sphere deal with WIF was never on the cards.

This was despite the memecoin’s X account posting, and quickly deleting, “Officially confirmed. Viva hat vegas.”

To make matters more confusing, it announced the refunds for the fundraiser on April Fool’s Day. WIF is down 96% since its all-time high around the time the fundraiser was announced. 

Ansem has since gone on to launch his own $ANSEM token. Its price has shot up over 75,000% across the past seven days while onlookers have questioned why he has allocated large sums of the airdrop to a small number of wallets.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.