Crypto World
PiggyBank’s LAB hedge backfires as USDC vault NAV drops 15%
PiggyBank has closed a hedge tied to LAB after sharp price swings and deeply negative funding rates made the trade too costly to maintain.
Summary
- PiggyBank closed the LAB short after volatility and negative funding breached its internal risk limits.
- The USDC vault faces a 15% drawdown, while SPYx and JitoSOL show smaller reported declines.
- ZachXBT questioned using depositor funds for LAB after earlier allegations around its token distribution structure.
The DeFi yield protocol said the move will reduce the net asset value of several vaults, including an estimated 15% drawdown for its USDC product.
The disclosure drew fresh questions about how PiggyBank used depositor capital and measured risk. On-chain investigator ZachXBT said the protocol had lost user assets by “gambling on blatant scam coins,” while PiggyBank said it acted before the position crossed its risk limits.
PiggyBank closes LAB short after funding pressure
PiggyBank said it opened the position about one month earlier with $100,000, equal to roughly 2% of its portfolio at that time. The strategy involved buying locked LAB tokens at a discount through an over-the-counter desk and shorting LAB perpetual contracts to offset price risk.
The protocol said LAB then faced “violent manipulation,” thin liquidity and deeply negative funding rates. Those conditions raised the cost of keeping the short open. PiggyBank said maintaining the hedge had become “economically irrational,” so it closed the short to limit further losses.
USDC vault faces the largest NAV drawdown
PiggyBank valued its locked LAB position at about $1.35 million using current prices. However, the protocol removed that holding from its net asset value calculation because the tokens cannot yet be sold. The first unlock is scheduled for August 14.
As a result, PiggyBank expects its USDC vault to show an estimated 15% drawdown. SPYx could record a 12% decline, while JitoSOL could fall 9%. These figures reflect the accounting treatment announced by the protocol and may change when the locked LAB tokens begin unlocking.
ZachXBT questions LAB exposure and risk controls
ZachXBT criticized the trade and questioned why user funds gained exposure to LAB. His response followed earlier claims about the token’s ownership and trading activity. As previously reported by crypto.news, he alleged in May that LAB-linked insiders controlled more than 95% of supply and had hidden key distribution details.
Those claims remain allegations, and the available PiggyBank statement did not address LAB’s token distribution. It focused on the hedge, funding costs and the decision to exclude locked tokens from NAV. PiggyBank also did not announce compensation or explain whether users can withdraw at the revised values.
Detailed PiggyBank report remains pending
PiggyBank said it will publish a detailed report with its next steps. The team has not yet released that report publicly. The coming update may provide trade records, risk thresholds, loss calculations and plans for the August unlock.
Until then, users have limited information on the final recovery value of the LAB position. The locked tokens could regain value before release, but they could also trade lower. PiggyBank’s next report will determine how the protocol records future changes and manages the affected vaults across its three products.
Crypto World
The Ripple (XRP) Crash Scenario That Could Create Massive Opportunity: Analyst
Despite the slight recovery, the crypto sector remains suppressed under the ongoing bear market.
One popular analyst believes that Ripple’s XRP, which was heavily affected by the latest correction, may plummet under $1 in the short term, noting that such a move could turn out to be an excellent buying opportunity.
The Hidden Benefit?
As of this writing, XRP trades at around $1.15 (per CoinGecko’s data), representing a 12% decline from last Monday’s valuation. X user Ali Martinez said he is closely monitoring $0.90, adding that a slip to such a low level could present “a compelling long-term buying opportunity.”
Some of the commentators on the post doubted that Ripple’s cross-border token would tumble below $1. However, others revealed they have placed buy orders at $0.50, with Martinez describing this as “not a bad idea.”
The recent actions of the whales suggest that the price is at real risk of a further decline. Recently, these market participants offloaded 60 million tokens over a week, signaling fading confidence and potentially triggering panic among smaller investors, which could lead to a more serious sell-off.
Additionally, one anonymous whale opened a nearly $1.5 million short position on XRP. These big investors are often rumored to have inside knowledge of upcoming events likely to impact the token’s price. We have yet to see whether this whale will make a profit from the massive bet or whether this would turn into a reckless gamble.
Time to Rally?
Other analysts are quite optimistic that the worst is over, predicting a decisive comeback in the near future. X user CRYPTOWZRD said the asset closed the previous day on a bullish note, adding that a surge above $1.15 could offer an upside move.
For their part, Joshua Dalton envisioned a pump to the rather unreal (at least as of the moment) $3.50 by the end of June, while Zach Humphries revealed purchasing XRP for the first time in two years.
“The last time I bought XRP it was at $0.50 and scooping it up at $1.09 feels like a very similar opportunity,” they explained.
Institutional interest in the token remains solid, which could support a move higher. Unlike spot BTC and ETH ETFs, those with XRP as the underlying token have attracted a substantial amount of capital even amid the market crash – a sign that big players like pension funds and hedge funds continue to increase their exposure despite the bearish conditions.

The post The Ripple (XRP) Crash Scenario That Could Create Massive Opportunity: Analyst appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Stablecoins Need Confidentiality to Move Institutional Volume
- Stablecoins have improved speed, cost, and finality, but public transaction visibility limits institutional adoption.
- Banks, payment firms, treasuries, and payroll teams need confidential, auditable payment flows matching standards already used across finance.
- Private payments can make stablecoins usable for payroll, merchant settlement, supplier payments, treasury activity, and regulated institutional transfers.
Stablecoin payment networks have spent years proving they can settle value faster and cheaper than legacy systems, yet institutional volume still depends on a more basic requirement: confidentiality.
Banks, treasuries, payroll teams, payment companies, and corporate finance departments already protect counterparties, payment sizes, balances, and timing patterns from public view. They accept audit, compliance, and regulator visibility through controlled channels, while public disclosure remains outside normal financial operations.
The same expectation applies to everyday users. A worker receiving a salary expects privacy. A merchant paying a supplier expects competitors to remain unable to infer margins or trading relationships. A public company managing treasury activity expects sensitive movements to stay protected from market observers.
Stablecoins can become a major payment system for the real economy only when they match this standard.
Public Visibility Limits Stablecoin Adoption
The industry often measures stablecoins through speed, cost, and finality because those metrics are easy to compare with legacy systems. Confidentiality receives less attention because it is harder to benchmark, even though it determines whether serious payment activity can move across open blockchain networks.
Traditional financial systems are built around selective visibility. SWIFT messages, Fedwire transfers, ACH batches, and card payments remain visible to transaction parties, service providers, compliance teams, auditors, and authorised regulators. The public, competitors, and unrelated observers remain outside those records.
Open blockchains changed this operating assumption by making transaction details visible to every observer and permanent by design. A small transfer between personal wallets may tolerate public visibility in exchange for speed and finality, while a payment company moving billions across thousands of merchants faces a very different risk profile.
The exposed data is commercially sensitive. Counterparties, amounts, timing, wallet balances, and payment patterns can reveal revenue, strategy, supplier terms, customer concentration, and personal income. Stablecoins can offer faster settlement, yet still fall short for institutions if adoption requires publishing information their current systems already protect.
Confidentiality Defines Commercial Use
Stablecoin adoption has advanced in areas where transparency is manageable or where banking access is limited. Institutional pilots have moved through controlled corridors, while consumer use has grown more easily in markets with different expectations around financial privacy.
In markets where banking privacy is standard, public-by-default payments create an adoption ceiling. Corporate payroll, supplier payments, merchant settlement, treasury operations, and institutional transfers all require confidential handling of sensitive information.
Cost and throughput have improved across many blockchain networks, while confidentiality has remained underdeveloped for everyday payment use. This leaves stablecoins technically capable of carrying more volume than many institutions can responsibly place on open ledgers.
The commercial requirement is straightforward: payment details should stay hidden from the public while remaining auditable for authorised review. This is how regulated finance already works, and stablecoins need the same balance to compete for institutional payment activity.
Privacy Must Work With Compliance
Crypto privacy has often meant full concealment, a design regulated financial firms must avoid. Banks, payment companies, public corporations, and compliance-bound users need privacy from the market, competitors, and unrelated observers, alongside access for taxation, reporting, audits, and lawful oversight.
A useful privacy model protects payment details from public exposure while preserving accountability. Payroll deposits, supplier payments, and corporate transfers already operate this way in traditional finance. They remain private from the public, while still existing inside accounting, compliance, and reporting systems.
Stablecoin payments need the same balance. Privacy should protect users from open financial surveillance while preserving the audit paths required by regulated businesses and individuals.
Polygon’s Private Payments Address This Requirement
Polygon’s private payments work is designed around this commercial requirement. The Polygon wallet now includes a “Privately Send” option alongside the standard send flow, allowing users to route transactions through a shielded protocol.
Zero-knowledge proofs verify transfer validity while hiding the sender, receiver, and amount from outside observers. The protocol remains non-custodial, with custody staying under user control throughout the transfer.
Outside observers can verify valid network activity, while participants and amounts remain protected from public view. Sender and receiver addresses are also kept unlinkable onchain, reducing the ability to reconstruct payment relationships through block explorer analysis.
Compliance belongs inside the same flow. Private transactions pass through Know Your Transaction screening, and users can generate audit files for tax authorities and regulators where applicable. Payment details stay hidden from public market observers while remaining available for authorised review.
This distinction is essential for institutional adoption. Privacy designed for regulated use can bring onchain payments closer to ordinary financial operations, instead of forcing institutions into a separate system with incompatible compliance expectations.
Confidentiality Extends Beyond Wallet Payments
Private wallet payments are the most visible part of this work, but the same requirement applies across trading and institutional activity.
Public mempools expose pending transactions before settlement, creating front-running and information leakage risks for serious market participants. Private mempools reduce those risks by limiting pre-trade visibility. Institutions with deeper confidentiality requirements may also use private chains to keep sensitive activity within controlled environments.
These tools serve the same commercial need across payments, trading, and institutional operations. Users and firms gain privacy as an optional property of the payment environment while keeping access to the liquidity, applications, and connectivity of public blockchain networks.
Stablecoins Need to Feel Familiar Where It Counts
The mainstream case for stablecoins has always depended on the promise of faster, cheaper, global payments with the familiarity financial users already expect.
Confidentiality is part of this promise. Businesses should be able to settle with suppliers without exposing commercial relationships to competitors. Workers should be able to receive salaries without publishing personal income. Payment companies should be able to serve merchants without revealing volumes to the market. Institutions should be able to use stablecoins while preserving the financial privacy standards they already follow.
The market for public-by-default payments is limited to users willing to accept open visibility. The market for confidential, auditable stablecoin payments includes the companies, institutions, workers, merchants, and payment providers already moving through the regulated financial system.
Speed, cost, and finality made stablecoins technically attractive, while confidentiality makes them commercially usable for the payment volume institutions already manage.
The post Stablecoins Need Confidentiality to Move Institutional Volume appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Ironwood Pool to Restore Supply Verification After Orchard Flaw
Zcash developers are lining up a new shielded-pool upgrade, Ironwood, in response to a patched bug that raised concerns about the potential creation of counterfeit ZEC without detection. The upgrade would embed formal verification and independent audits into the Orchard privacy protocol, while changing how funds move between pools to provide a clearer accounting trail.
The Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) said it is coordinating with Tachyon, Valar Group, the Zcash Foundation and Shielded Labs on the plan. Under Ironwood, the Orchard pool would be closed to new deposits and internal transactions would be halted, with funds required to pass through a “turnstile”—an accounting checkpoint—before entering Ironwood.
The Zcash Foundation disclosed that auditors had identified a vulnerability in Orchard. Importantly, developers noted there is no evidence that user funds were affected or that ZEC’s total supply changed. Shielded Labs described the flaw as potentially allowing an attacker to mint an unlimited amount of counterfeit ZEC within Orchard, had it been exploited.
In the proposed design, Ironwood would not depend on proving retroactively whether the bug was exploited; rather, it would provide a mechanism to determine if counterfeit ZEC could have escaped the old pool. Shielded Labs explained that if users migrate to Ironwood and no excess ZEC leaves the original Orchard pool, that would be strong evidence the vulnerability was never exploited. Conversely, if excess ZEC attempts to depart the old pool, the turnstile would prevent it, effectively blocking counterfeit coins from entering the supply.
According to ZODL, activation of Ironwood is targeted for late July 2026, pending thorough testing, review, and coordination across the Zcash ecosystem. The upgrade represents a broader attempt to bolster confidence in shielded transactions at a moment when the community is balancing privacy with robust security guarantees.
Meanwhile, market context remains in flux. ZEC traded around $429 at the time of reporting, after dipping from above $600 in the wake of the vulnerability disclosure. CoinGecko tracks that swing, underscoring how security concerns can quickly influence sentiment even as protocol-level mitigations are pursued. CoinGecko data reflect the volatility surrounding Orchard’s patch and the ensuing upgrade discussions. A related piece exploring the market impact of the Orchard bug noted a pronounced decline in ZEC before and after the patch.
In public discussions on X, Shielded Labs noted Ironwood’s potential to shed light on whether the Orchard vulnerability was exploited, while stressing the upgrade’s design does not hinge on retroactive proof. Some community members have debated whether post-mortem proof could imply backdoors or obligations, while others argued that deprecating Orchard and mandating a turnstile would trap any excess coins regardless of exploitation history.
Ripple’s former chief technology officer, David Schwartz, contributed to the conversation by suggesting that if there were no exploits, users would be safe regardless of their migration choices. He emphasized that those who stay in the old pool would remain safe and have continued access to their funds, even if the long-term path for Orchard is shifting toward Ironwood.
What Ironwood changes mean for users and builders
Ironwood represents more than a single upgrade; it signals a shift toward formal verification and third-party audits as a core component of shielded protocol security. By introducing an explicit called-out checkpoint—the turnstile—Zcash aims to reduce ambiguity around the flow of funds between pools and to provide a clearer signal about the integrity of the system as a whole.
For users, the key question is whether to migrate to Ironwood or stay in Orchard during the transition. If Ironwood activation goes ahead and no counterfeit ZEC leaves the Orchard pool, it would indicate a low likelihood of exploitation. If, however, the turnstile blocks abnormal withdrawals, that would confirm the mechanism’s effectiveness at preventing counterfeit coins from affecting supply. Either outcome would refine risk assumptions for users and validators moving forward.
From a network-security perspective, the collaboration among ZODL, Tachyon, Valar Group, the Zcash Foundation and Shielded Labs highlights a broader trend toward more transparent, auditable privacy primitives. The emphasis on formal verification and independent audits aligns with growing expectations in the crypto space that privacy-focused components must withstand rigorous scrutiny before deployment at scale.
Related reading: Why ZEC fell 40% even after Zcash patched a shielded pool bug
As Ironwood’s July 2026 target approaches, observers will be watching three main threads: the thoroughness of the formal verification and audits, the results of testing across the Zcash ecosystem, and the community’s consensus on how to interpret any post-migration signals regarding vulnerability exploitation. The outcome could influence how other privacy-preserving networks approach vulnerability remediation and upgrade governance in the months ahead.
Readers should stay tuned for updates on audit progress, test results, and any further middleware changes as the community weighs the balance between robust privacy and verifiable security.
Crypto World
Crypto Selloff Explained: Leverage, ETF Outflows, and Macro Pressure Hit at Once
TLDR:
- Bitcoin dropped from roughly $82,000 to the low-$60,000 range amid broad market selling pressure.
- The crypto market has corrected nearly 53% from its peak as fear overtook sentiment rapidly.
- ETF outflows, Mt. Gox transfers, and macro uncertainty converged to trigger the sharp decline.
- Analysts say the selloff reflects a leverage and sentiment reset, not a cycle-ending breakdown.
Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are under pressure as a wave of selling has erased gains accumulated over recent months.
The total crypto market has corrected nearly 53% from its peak, while Bitcoin slipped from around $82,000 to the low-$60,000 range.
The Fear & Greed Index collapsed from greed to extreme fear within days. Analysts warn that sentiment has fallen faster than prices, creating conditions that historically precede major market recoveries.
Multiple Catalysts Converge to Spark Selloff
Several events struck simultaneously, creating an environment that accelerated the downturn. MicroStrategy sold a portion of its Bitcoin holdings, breaking a widely held belief that the firm would never liquidate. That alone rattled investor confidence in one of the market’s most prominent institutional narratives.
A large Mt. Gox wallet transfer added to the anxiety, triggering fears of incoming sell pressure from long-dormant coins.
At the same time, Bitcoin ETFs recorded billions in outflows after months of sustained inflows that had helped drive the bull run.
Macro conditions also played a role. Rising inflation concerns, unclear Federal Reserve policy, and escalating geopolitical tensions pushed investors away from risk assets broadly. Crypto, often treated as a high-beta risk asset, absorbed a disproportionate share of that retreat.
Excessive leverage across the market then became a compounding factor. As prices fell, forced liquidations triggered cascading sell orders that deepened losses and accelerated downside volatility beyond what fundamentals alone would justify.
Sentiment Reset, Not Structural Failure, Say Analysts
Crypto analyst Crypto Patel offered a measured reading of the situation. “The current correction is primarily a reset of sentiment and leverage—not a collapse of the underlying asset class,” he noted.
He pointed to the historical pattern where weak hands exit and overleveraged positions unwind before prices stabilize and trend higher.
Patel identified the $60,000 region as a key psychological support level to monitor. He also flagged ETF flow data as a critical indicator of whether institutional demand is returning. Sustained inflows would suggest smart money is accumulating at lower levels.
Beyond price levels, Patel stressed that macro data remains the dominant catalyst. Inflation figures and Fed decisions will carry more weight than social media speculation in determining the market’s next direction. Traders focusing on those variables will have a clearer read on conditions.
His broader advice centered on discipline. Defining accumulation zones before emotions take control, managing risk to survive deeper corrections, and separating short-term volatility from long-term market structure are practices that separate experienced investors from reactive ones. Markets rarely bottom in optimism — fear-driven environmen
Crypto World
China court treats Bitcoin as property in 107 BTC theft case
A Chinese court sentenced a man to 10 years and nine months after he memorized a wallet recovery phrase and stole 107 Bitcoin.
Summary
- Zhang memorized 11 recovery words, reconstructed the last, and transferred 107 Bitcoin from Feng’s wallet.
- Prosecutors treated Bitcoin as property because holders exercise control through private keys and recovery phrases.
- Electronic records disproved Zhang’s “protective takeover” claim and confirmed 660,000 yuan in sale proceeds.
The case began in July 2023, when a Bitcoin holder identified as Feng asked an acquaintance, Zhang, to help convert 117 Bitcoin. Zhang had assisted with an earlier transaction, so Feng trusted him to set up a new digital wallet and handle the process.
Feng wrote down the wallet’s 12-word recovery phrase while Zhang watched. Prosecutors said Zhang memorized 11 words and the first letter of the last one. He later tested possible words, gained control of the wallet and transferred 107 Bitcoin to addresses he controlled.
Electronic evidence challenged the “protective takeover” claim
Feng noticed the missing Bitcoin the next day and contacted a blockchain security company before reporting the theft. Police opened an investigation in October 2023. Investigators used wallet records, transaction data and linked IP addresses to connect Zhang to the transfers.
Zhang admitted moving the Bitcoin but called it a “protective takeover” intended to prevent another theft. He also claimed he lost money while speculating and had not cashed out. Transaction records contradicted that account. Investigators traced the assets through several wallets and found more than 660,000 yuan, or about $97,000, in proceeds sent to a friend’s bank account.
Prosecutors treat Bitcoin as property under criminal law
“Current policies deny virtual currencies legal-tender status, but do not deny their property attributes,” the prosecutor handling the case said.
The Licang District People’s Procuratorate argued that Bitcoin carries economic value and gives holders exclusive control through private keys and recovery phrases. Prosecutors said those features meet the criminal-law definition of property, allowing Bitcoin to serve as the object of theft.
They used the realized cash proceeds to calculate the theft amount because China has no official Bitcoin exchange rate. The approach avoided assigning a market value to all 107 Bitcoin when determining Zhang’s sentence.
The Licang District People’s Court convicted Zhang of theft on April 28, 2025. It sentenced him to 10 years and nine months in prison and imposed a 100,000-yuan fine. The Qingdao Intermediate People’s Court rejected his appeal and upheld the ruling on Nov. 10, 2025.
The decision does not reverse China’s restrictions on cryptocurrency trading and related financial services. Bitcoin still lacks legal-tender status, and mainland regulators continue to classify many crypto business activities as illegal financial operations.
As previously reported by crypto.news, China’s Supreme People’s Court said in May that it would study clearer judicial rules for virtual-currency disputes. Local courts have already treated Bitcoin as virtual property in cases involving theft, ownership and recovery.
The Qingdao case adds another example of courts protecting crypto ownership while regulators restrict trading. It also shows how brief physical exposure to a recovery phrase can give another person full control of a self-custody wallet.
Crypto World
Elon Musk Accepts Dogecoin for SpaceX Payments as DOGE Stalls Ahead of Historic IPO
Dogecoin is back in the headlines, but the chart is refusing to cooperate. SpaceX has confirmed that it accepted DOGE as payment for the DOGE-1 lunar mission, delivering another Elon Musk narrative that has historically sparked double-digit moves. This time, price action at the $0.080–$0.085 range shows that retails are hesitating.
Geometric Energy Corporation announced the DOGE-funded mission on Sunday, with SpaceX confirming it accepted Dogecoin as the full payment mechanism for the satellite launch.
“SpaceX launching satellite Doge-1 to the moon next year — Mission paid for in Doge — 1st crypto in space, 1st meme in space,” Musk posted on Twitter years ago.
SpaceX VP of Commercial Sales Tom Ochinero framed the mission as setting “the foundation for interplanetary commerce,” per Geometric Energy’s statement. The financial value of the contract was not disclosed.
DOGE previously shed more than a third of its value after Musk called it a “hustle” during his Saturday Night Live appearance, and with a SpaceX IPO increasingly discussed as a market-moving event, sentiment around anything Musk-adjacent is running hot but volatile.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Can Dogecoin Price Recover From $0.078 or Is a Deeper Pullback Coming?
Historical price data places DOGE in a tight corridor between $0.080 and $0.085, where selling pressure emerged following Musk’s payment confirmation remarks. That’s a 5-6% band that has repeatedly defined near-term direction. Neither level is holding with conviction right now.
Prior Elon Musk-driven spikes, Dogecoin showed immediate surges of 2%, but those moves reversed sharply once the initial wave of retail buying exhausted itself. Momentum indicators across that cycle pointed to classic pump-and-fade behavior.
Three scenarios are on the table. First, DOGE holds $0.078 as support, SpaceX IPO speculation, and fresh Musk commentary drive a push toward $0.10+, with the DOGE-1 launch timeline acting as a recurring narrative catalyst.
The second scenario would likely see Dogecoin price consolidating in the $0.080–$0.085 range for several sessions, grinding sideways as broader crypto market conditions dictate direction more than meme-specific news.
However, a break below $0.078 opens the door to sharper downside as the SNL-driven collapse demonstrated DOGE can lose over 33% in a single session when sentiment flips.
Musk’s influence on crypto price action cuts both ways, and traders leaning long on DOGE are, effectively, leaning long on one man’s Twitter feed.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Maxi Doge Targets Early-Mover Upside as Dogecoin Tests Key Levels
DOGE’s ceiling problem is structural. At its current market cap, a move to previous all-time highs requires billions in fresh capital, and the meme cycle that fueled 2021’s run looks harder to replicate. That’s the gap where early-stage meme tokens with distinct identities tend to attract rotation capital.
Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is making a direct play at that opportunity. Built on Ethereum (ERC-20), it positions itself as the “240-lb canine juggernaut” of the meme token space, embodying 1000x leverage trading energy with actual community mechanics behind it.
The presale has raised more than $4.7 million at a current price of $0.0002823, with dynamic APY staking already live for holders. Standout features include holder-only trading competitions with leaderboard rewards and a Maxi Fund treasury dedicated to liquidity and partnerships.
Research Maxi Doge ahead of the next presale stage.
The post Elon Musk Accepts Dogecoin for SpaceX Payments as DOGE Stalls Ahead of Historic IPO appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Bitcoin holds steady after Sunday’s rally, though full-fledged reversal may take longer
Bitcoin held above $63,000 on Monday, looking to build on a 4% Sunday rally spurred by Strategy (MSTR) Executive Chairman Michael Saylor hinting at further purchases of the largest cryptocurrency. Saylor’s stance is a signal markets take seriously given the company’s track record of aggressive accumulation.
Bitcoin’s stability is breathing life back into lesser-tracked corners of the market. Audiera’s BEAT token has surged 78% in the past 24 hours and Siren’s SIREN added 33%, making them the two best-performing coins among the top 100 by market cap. Audiera is a Web3 entertainment and rhythm gaming platform built on BNB Chain that treats AI characters and virtual idols as economic participants. Siren is also a BNB-based Web3 AI project. The catalysts for the moves are unclear.
The broader market recovery hinges on what bitcoin does next. It is currently trading near its 200-week simple moving average, a level that has historically acted as a long-term support and a key battleground between bulls and bears at major cycle turning points.
“The sentiment index plummeted to 8, once again showing single-digit values on Monday, following a two-month hiatus and failed attempts to consolidate in positive territory. Judging by the dynamics near Bitcoin’s 200-week moving average and the sentiment index, the situation resembles mid-2022,” Alex Kuptsikevich, the chief market analyst at FxPro said in an email.
“Under similar conditions at that time, the downward momentum weakened, but a full-fledged reversal did not occur until many months later,” he wrote.
Derivatives positioning
- Bitcoin’s futures open interest collapsed to 716,000 BTC from a record 901,000 BTC just four days ago, a stark illustration of how brutally last week’s price crash wiped out leveraged positions across the market.
- One silver lining: the decline in open interest suggests traders largely didn’t pile into new shorts during the selloff, meaning the move was driven by forced long liquidations rather than aggressive bearish conviction.
- Ether (ETH) tells a similar story. Open interest has pulled back to 14.58 million ETH from 15.98 million ETH late last month.
- is the standout coin of the past 24 hours. Open interest has jumped over 13% in the past 24 hours to 1.64 million BCH, the highest level since July 2023, even as its price bucked the recovery with an 8.3% slide. Rising open interest against a falling price typically signals short accumulation, and BCH’s negative 24-hour cumulative volume delta confirms it: Traders are actively shorting at market prices rather than placing limit orders. The setup points to persistent bearish sentiment and potential for further losses.
- Canton Network’s CC token is also seeing an uptick in open interest.
- On the volatility front, the stabilization in bitcoin is showing up in so-called fear gauges. The 30-day annualized implied volatility index BVIV has retreated to 50% from a peak of nearly 59% on Friday, suggesting the acute stress is fading and conditions are supportive of at least some consolidation. Ether’s implied volatility pulled back to 69% from 75%.
- Options market sentiment has shifted noticeably. The five most actively traded instruments on Deribit in the past 24 hours are all calls, including a $170,000 strike expiring Dec. 25. That’s a bet bitcoin will rally above that level before year-end. These deep out-of-the-money calls function as cheap lottery tickets: small premium, long odds and a massive payoff if the trade comes good.
- One risk factor remains. The dealer gamma profile around $60,000 continues to point to a setup where market makers may be forced to trade in the direction of price moves to rebalance their books, a dynamic that could amplify swings in either direction.
Token talk
- Zcash (ZEC) has rebounded 45% from last week’s low after developers proposed a fix for a critical counterfeiting bug in its privacy-focused Orchard pool.
- The Ironwood proposal would move users to a new, repaired privacy pool and let anyone running Zcash software verify that no more than the correct amount of ZEC exists.
- As coins migrate out of the old pool, any counterfeit ZEC would either be exposed or stranded and destroyed, potentially revealing whether the flaw was ever exploited, though developers say abuse is unlikely.
- Elsewhere, Tether’s dollar-pegged stablecoin USDT briefly overtook ether (ETH) in market capitalization over the weekend as the latter fell alongside the broader market.
- Ether slid from $2,000 to just over $1,500 from Friday to Sunday, bringing it to a $183 billion market cap compared with USDT’s $186 billion. The token has recovered since, bringing it back above USDT, though it remains far below bitcoin ‘s $1.2 trillion level.
Crypto World
Viral Altcoin Skyrockets by 80% Daily, Bitcoin (BTC) Jumped to $64K: Market Watch
Likely driven by Trump’s latest promising words about a potential peace deal between the US and Iran to be announced in the next few days, BTC jumped from $62,000 to over $64,000 in minutes earlier today before it was stopped.
Most larger-cap alts have remained relatively sluggish on a daily scale, aside from HYPE, which has reclaimed the $60 support after a 3% increase.
Bitcoin Eyes $64K
The previous week was one of the most violent in bitcoin’s recent history. The asset started it at around $73,000, but the bears quickly took control and drove it below $70,000. The key support levels kept falling one after the other, and BTC found itself dropping below $68,000, $65,000, and even $62,000 as the week progressed.
The focus turned to the $60,000 level, which managed to hold the February crash. The bulls managed to defend it at first on Thursday and on Friday morning, but the pressure was too strong on Friday afternoon, and that line finally gave in.
Bitcoin dipped to $59,100 for the first time in almost two years. Nevertheless, it quickly rebounded and reclaimed the $60,000 level by the end of the day, and climbed to $61,000 on Saturday and $62,000 on Sunday. More volatility occurred in the past 12 hours or so after the latest developments on the war front, and BTC surged to $64,200 before it was stopped and driven south by a grand.
Its market cap is up to $1.265 trillion, while its dominance over the alts has increased to 56.3% on CG.

BEAT Rockets
The altcoin in question that has pumped by 80% in the past 24 hours alone is Audiera (BEAT). The asset is by far the top performer today, surging to a price of $4.30 and becoming the 62nd-largest alt by market cap. SIREN has surged by 32%, followed by NEAR’s 13% jump. DeXe completes the double-digit price gain club, with an 11% increase.
The larger-cap alts are a lot less volatile today. ETH is up to $1,660 after a 1.5% increase, BNB is still close to $600, while SOL is above $66. HYPE has gained 3% and sits well above $60, while ZEC continues on its recovery path with a 6% jump to $425.
The total crypto market cap has added another $20 billion daily and is up to $2.260 trillion on CG.

The post Viral Altcoin Skyrockets by 80% Daily, Bitcoin (BTC) Jumped to $64K: Market Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
SpaceX IPO Launch Imminent: Why Wall Street Experts Urge Caution on Day One
Executive Summary
- SpaceX plans to complete its initial public offering this week, seeking $75 billion in capital at a historic $1.75 trillion market capitalization
- The Starlink division boasts more than 10 million users with Ebitda margins exceeding 60%; Baron Capital forecasts 300 million subscribers within 12 years
- Major agreements with Anthropic and Alphabet secure approximately $26 billion annually in AI computing rental revenue
- A majority of surveyed investment professionals recommend avoiding immediate purchases due to anticipated volatility and the company’s pre-profitability phase
- Corporate governance structure raises red flags — Musk maintains complete control over all voting shares and board composition
The highly anticipated SpaceX initial public offering is scheduled to be priced before the end of this week. The aerospace manufacturer seeks to secure $75 billion in fresh capital, positioning the company at a $1.75 trillion enterprise value. If successful, this would shatter all previous IPO records.
The pending public debut has created considerable debate within the investment community. While some view it as an exceptional entry opportunity, the majority counsel patience.
Arguments Supporting Investment
The primary investment thesis revolves around Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite-based internet service. The division currently serves over 10 million paying customers while maintaining Ebitda profit margins surpassing 60%.
Ron Baron of Baron Capital anticipates the subscriber base will reach 15 million by late 2026, eventually expanding to 300 million customers by 2036. Such growth could deliver $500 billion in yearly revenue alongside $300 billion in Ebitda during the 2030s.
The company has diversified into artificial intelligence infrastructure as well. Recent contracts with Anthropic and Alphabet secure computing capacity rentals worth approximately $26 billion annually. According to ARK Invest’s analysis, this generates roughly $52 billion in revenue for SpaceX.
Musk has publicly outlined ambitions to expand AI computing capabilities one hundred-fold. Using current rate structures, that expansion could yield $2.6 trillion in AI rental income.
Supporting these projections is SpaceX’s dominance in orbital launches and ongoing Starship development. This fully reusable heavy-lift vehicle could slash orbital access costs from thousands of dollars per kilogram down to hundreds.
Skeptical Perspectives
Critics emphasize that these figures represent distant projections rather than current realities. Starship remains in development. The proposed AI satellite network hasn’t been validated at commercial scale.
Robert Johnson, a finance professor, noted the valuation “assumes all of its growth projections play out perfectly.” He advised typical investors to avoid the offering.
Andy VandenBerg referenced Truist research indicating major technology IPOs experience average maximum declines of 55% during their inaugural year. He predicts superior entry opportunities will emerge later.
Keith Fitz-Gerald cautioned that individual investors are “not prepared” for the institutional trading dynamics that characteristically follow prominent public listings.
Mike Serio highlighted Meta’s experience, which failed to exceed S&P 500 returns until over a decade following its public debut.
Corporate Control and IPO Mechanics
Governance concerns have achieved widespread consensus. The corporate framework grants Musk absolute authority over voting shares and board membership. Yumi Narita representing the New York City Comptroller’s Office described it as “unprecedentedly bad.”
Lockup provisions deviate from conventional IPO standards. Rather than a uniform 180-day restriction expiration, SpaceX implements staggered lockups partially linked to share price performance.
Barron’s analysts suggest SpaceX represents superior value at $90 per share compared to the anticipated IPO pricing of $135.
Among eight investment professionals polled by Business Insider, six indicated they would decline to purchase shares on the debut day.
Crypto World
Zcash Proposes Ironwood Pool After Orchard Bug
Zcash developers are proposing a new shielded pool called Ironwood after a recently patched bug raised concerns about whether counterfeit ZEC could have entered circulation unnoticed.
The Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) said Saturday that it is working with Tachyon, Valar Group, the Zcash Foundation and Shielded Labs on the proposed network upgrade, which would add formal verification and independent audits to the Orchard protocol, a privacy system that lets users move ZEC without revealing transaction details.
The proposal would close the current Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transactions, requiring funds to pass through a “turnstile,” which serves as an accounting checkpoint, before entering Ironwood.
The Zcash Foundation said Wednesday that auditors discovered a vulnerability in the Orchard shielded pool. Developers said there was no evidence that user funds were affected or that Zcash’s total supply changed.
Auditors at Shielded Labs said the vulnerability could have allowed attackers to create an infinite amount of counterfeit ZEC within Orchard without detection.

Source: ZODL
Ironwood could show whether counterfeit ZEC existed
In a separate X post, Shielded Labs said Ironwood may produce evidence about whether the Orchard bug was ever exploited, though the proposal does not depend on proving the issue retroactively.
If users migrate from Orchard to Ironwood and no excess ZEC tries to leave the old pool, that would be strong evidence that the vulnerability was never exploited, Shielded Labs said. If excess ZEC tries to leave, the turnstile would reject it, effectively preventing counterfeit coins from entering the supply.
Related: Why ZEC fell 40% even after Zcash patched a shielded pool bug
The distinction has been a source of discussion among community members. Some questioned whether Zcash can prove the bug was not exploited without implying some kind of backdoor. Others argued that if Orchard is deprecated and funds can only leave through a turnstile, any excess coins would be trapped even if they existed.
David Schwartz, Ripple’s former chief technology officer, said on X that if there were no exploits, users would remain safe whether or not they move their coins. He said users who stay in the pool may be “lonely” there, but their funds would remain safe and accessible.

Zcash 24-hour price chart. Source: CoinGecko
ZEC traded at $429 at the time of writing. It fell as low as $303 from above $600 when traders reacted to the vulnerability disclosure on Friday, according to CoinGecko.
ZODL said it plans to target Ironwood activation for late July 2026, pending testing, review and coordination across the Zcash ecosystem.
Magazine: Bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI, so why is the hashrate near ATHs?
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Evereve – Corporette.com
-
Business7 days agoJade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) Discusses Positive Interim Results From JADE101 Phase I Healthy Volunteer Study and Development Plans Transcript
-
Crypto World3 days ago
Jensen Huang Approves Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron for NVIDIA (NVDA) HBM4 Memory Supply
-
Sports6 days agoFrench Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Rafael Jodar and will play Jakub Mensik in semi-finals
-
Tech6 days agoCryZENx Releases Fresh Playable Content Deep Inside Jabu-Jabu for His Ocarina of Time Remake
-
Business5 days agoTrump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
-
Business1 day agoThe Pain Points Taking a Fragile Tech Rally Down a Notch
-
NewsBeat6 days agoRepublicans balk at Trump’s attempt to appoint a MAGA enforcer to lead National Intelligence
-
Crypto World3 days ago
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
-
Tech3 days agoRCS Messages Between iPhone and Android Get End-to-End Encryption With iOS 26.5
-
Tech3 days agoMicrosoft launches MXC, an OS-level sandbox for AI agents, with OpenAI and Nvidia already on board
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Seagate (STX) Stock Surges to Record High on AI Boom and Legal Settlement
-
Tech3 days agoMeta steals a tactic from Tesla and builds data centers in tents
-
Crypto World22 hours agoTrump’s AI Ownership Plan Could Benefit Anthropic at OpenAI’s Expense
-
Business3 days ago(VIDEO) Justin Bieber Delivers Surprise Happy Birthday Serenade to Diners at Los Angeles Mexican Restaurant
-
Crypto World5 days agoEU AI Data Center Project Faces Delays as Funding Gaps Grow
-
Entertainment5 days agoDid The Mandalorian And Grogu Already Ruin The Next Star Wars Movie?
-
Business5 days agoAehr Test Systems Stock Soars 17% Amid Surging AI Demand and Conference Spotlight
-
Crypto World3 days ago
Merlin (MRLN) Stock Soars 32% on Major USSOCOM Autonomy Milestone
-
Business6 days agoClaude AI Down Today Reason: Why Anthropic’s AI is not working today? What’s the latest quota update


You must be logged in to post a comment Login