Crypto World
Polymarket adds 20x perps for crypto, stocks and gold
Polymarket has launched perpetual futures across 10 crypto, equity, index, and commodity markets, allowing eligible international users to trade with leverage of up to 20 times.
Summary
- Polymarket Perps supports long and short positions across 10 initial markets.
- BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE, gold, silver, oil, and two U.S. equity indices are available.
- Leverage reaches 20x, although access depends on each user’s jurisdiction.
- U.S. customers cannot access the international perps service under Polymarket’s current restrictions.
Polymarket Perps opens with 10 markets
Polymarket said in its launch announcement that the new service gives traders one interface for perpetual futures linked to cryptocurrencies, stocks, market indices, and commodities.
The first 10 markets cover Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and Hyperliquid’s HYPE token. Traders can also take positions linked to gold, silver, West Texas Intermediate oil, the S&P 500, and the Nasdaq 100.
SPCX, a contract tracking the price of SpaceX shares, completes the initial selection. Unlike buying shares through a stockbroker, an SPCX perpetual contract does not give its holder ownership, voting rights, or a claim on the company’s assets.
Users can open either long positions, which gain when the referenced price rises, or short positions, which gain when it falls. Polymarket has set the highest available leverage at 20x, but the precise limit can vary by contract, position size, and the platform’s margin rules.
Calling the product a venue with the “deepest liquidity, lowest fees,” the company did not provide comparative data in its announcement to support the claim. Polymarket also did not disclose full figures for trading volume, open interest, or deposited collateral at launch.
Perpetual futures differ from standard futures because they have no scheduled expiry date. Polymarket’s perps platform says a position can remain open while the trader continues to meet the required margin level.
Funding payments pass between long and short traders at regular intervals to keep each contract close to its reference price. When a perpetual contract trades above the underlying index, long traders generally pay short traders; the payment direction typically reverses when the contract trades below the index.
Leverage lets a user control a position worth more than the collateral posted. At 20x, each $1 of margin can support as much as $20 of exposure, magnifying both gains and losses. Polymarket states that positions remain active only while their margin requirements are met, meaning the platform can liquidate a trade after an adverse move reduces its available collateral.
The service takes Polymarket beyond event contracts
Adding perps gives Polymarket a second type of trading product alongside the event contracts on which it built its business. Prediction markets settle according to a defined outcome, while the new contracts track the changing price of an asset without an expiry date.
A Bitcoin event contract, for example, might ask whether BTC will trade above a specified level at a set time. Its payout depends on whether the stated condition occurs. A BTC perpetual future instead moves with Bitcoin’s reference price and remains open until the trader closes it or the platform liquidates the position.
The difference also applies to macroeconomic trading. Polymarket’s event markets may let users take positions on the result of a Federal Reserve meeting, while index, gold, or crypto perps let them trade the price movements that occur before and after the decision.
Offering both products gives users separate ways to express a market view, but the contracts carry different payout structures and risks. Event shares normally settle at a defined value after an outcome is confirmed, whereas a leveraged perp can generate ongoing gains or losses as its reference price moves.
Polymarket’s move follows similar product expansion by other trading companies. As crypto.news reported in September, Coinbase opened 23 crypto futures markets to eligible sophisticated and institutional investors in Canada, with leverage reaching 10x on supported contracts.
The Canadian service also includes products tied to gold, silver, oil, and the COIN50 crypto index. Coinbase provides the contracts through Coinbase Financial Markets, its U.S.-registered futures commission merchant, under an international exemption that does not open the products to Canadian retail traders.
Faster infrastructure supports heavier trading activity
Alongside the derivatives rollout, Polymarket has been working on changes intended to raise the number of orders its systems can process.
The company is targeting a capacity of 200,000 orders per second, according to earlier reporting on its trading infrastructure. The figure would represent about 15 times the platform’s previous throughput, while the underlying architecture is being prepared to eventually process more than 400,000 orders per second.
Tests cited in the report produced a 10- to 20-fold improvement in p99 latency, a measure that tracks the slowest group of transactions during periods of activity. Lower p99 latency can help an exchange process orders more consistently when trading volume rises, although Polymarket had not published a full independent performance assessment at the time of the report.
Execution and pricing controls carry added importance when a platform offers leveraged contracts. Small delays or short-lived price changes can affect margin calculations, liquidations and order execution, especially when a trader controls a position several times larger than the collateral supporting it.
In August, Polymarket changed the settlement method for its short-duration crypto event contracts after researchers examined activity around their final pricing windows. The platform adopted time-weighted prices following a study that identified 821 accounts with a combined $8.2 million in profits from settlement periods classified as likely manipulated.
Under the revised method, five-minute contracts use a 30-second price average, while 15-minute and four-hour markets use a 60-second average. Chainlink Data Streams supplies the pricing information, according to Polymarket’s August update.
U.S. access follows a separate regulatory route
Polymarket has limited its perps rollout to international users in locations where the service is legally available. American customers are not eligible to use the company’s international operation, including its leveraged perpetual futures interface.
The restriction stems from Polymarket’s 2022 settlement with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The regulator found that the company had offered event-based binary options without registering as a designated contract market or swap execution facility.
Polymarket agreed to pay a $1.4 million civil penalty and wind down markets that did not comply with U.S. law. Under the settlement, the company also had to prevent U.S. customers from accessing its international platform.
A separate regulated operation provides Polymarket’s route into the American market. Its U.S. venue operates under CFTC oversight, but a contract submitted through the regulator’s self-certification process does not receive an express CFTC endorsement.
Self-certification allows a registered exchange to state that a proposed product complies with the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC rules. The commission can still examine a filing, request more information, or stop a contract from trading when it identifies regulatory concerns.
In June, the CFTC was preparing a new review framework for event contracts, including products tied to sports, political developments, and events involving war or violence. The proposed approach would let the agency examine certain contracts individually rather than relying only on restrictions covering an entire category.
State authorities have also challenged the treatment of some prediction products as federally regulated derivatives. Recent court disputes have focused mainly on sports contracts, with state regulators arguing that they resemble gambling products and therefore require state licenses.
By August, litigation over prediction markets involved 20 states, while Polymarket had generated more than $1 billion in revenue, according to a recent platform review. The company received approval to operate a U.S. designated contract market before opening general access to its American platform in May 2026.
The international perps interface remains separate from that U.S. venue. American users seeking leveraged derivatives must use products offered by CFTC-regulated exchanges and intermediaries, subject to the contracts, margin limits, and customer eligibility rules available through each registered provider.
Crypto World
VARA and Securitize Sign MoU to Expand Tokenization in Dubai
Dubai’s regulator VARA has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Securitize, a tokenization platform backed by BlackRock, aiming to deepen regulated tokenization capabilities across the United Arab Emirates. The agreement, announced on Thursday, sets out a collaborative framework rather than a single product rollout.
For investors and market participants, the practical value of the deal lies in what it’s trying to do: align institutional tokenization expertise with Dubai’s regulatory approach to help trusted tokenized markets emerge within a clear compliance environment.
Key takeaways
- VARA and Securitize signed an MoU to collaborate on regulated tokenization initiatives in Dubai.
- The framework is intended to combine VARA’s regulatory perspective with Securitize’s experience in institutional tokenization, without committing to a specific technology stack or launch.
- Dubai is also actively expanding its licensed ecosystem, including VARA’s recent milestone of issuing its 50th virtual asset service provider (VASP) license.
- Tokenized asset activity continues to grow across “real-world assets” (RWA), with RWA.xyz reporting rising holders and higher overall tokenized value in the past month.
- The MoU arrives as tokenization efforts are spreading into other regulated markets, including moves toward tokenized stock trading in the UK.
A regulator-to-institution framework for tokenization
Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) and Securitize said their MoU is designed to support tokenization initiatives across Dubai and the broader UAE. In the announcement shared with Cointelegraph, the firms described the agreement as a collaborative structure intended to encourage institutional participation and strengthen the emirate’s digital asset ecosystem.
Crucially, VARA and Securitize framed the MoU as an arrangement that would help shape how tokenized financial products could operate under Dubai’s regulatory framework. That distinction matters because tokenization is still at an early stage in many jurisdictions: markets are moving quickly, but regulatory clarity often lags behind product innovation.
When asked about infrastructure goals, a VARA spokesperson told Cointelegraph that the MoU’s purpose is to establish a broad collaboration framework—aimed at identifying where each party’s strengths can support the development of “trusted, regulated tokenised markets” in Dubai. The spokesperson emphasized that the intent is to pair VARA’s regulatory perspective with Securitize’s institutional tokenization experience.
“The intention is to combine VARA’s regulatory perspective with Securitize’s experience in institutional tokenisation to identify where collaboration can help support the development of trusted, regulated tokenised markets in Dubai.”
At the same time, the spokesperson said there are no specific projects expected “at this stage.” That suggests the MoU is primarily about coordination and regulatory-integration work—potentially including planning, standards, and operational discussions—rather than immediate deployment of tokenized products.
Why Dubai’s licensing momentum is part of the story
Dubai has been trying to position itself as a hub for digital asset innovation, and VARA’s evolving licensing program is a key signal for the market. Earlier in July, VARA granted its 50th virtual asset service provider (VASP) license, this time to tokenization platform Tribe Tokenisation FZE.
That expansion provides context for the VARA–Securitize agreement. A growing number of licensed participants can make it easier for institutional projects to find compliant pathways, counterparties, and operational expectations. In other words, the MoU doesn’t just create a new relationship; it plugs into a broader regulatory-building effort already underway in Dubai.
Still, readers should note what remains uncertain: because no specific tokenized offerings were announced with the MoU, the market impact will depend on what collaboration outcomes follow—especially whether they translate into new product approvals, clearer operational guidance, or expanded institutional participation.
RWA demand continues to rise—measured in holders and value
The Dubai agreement is landing amid continued investor interest in tokenized assets, particularly real-world assets. According to data provider RWA.xyz, the number of RWA holders rose 103% over the prior 30 days to reach 3.2 million, while the total value of tokenized assets increased 2% to $38.5 billion in the same period.
Those figures help explain why institutional tokenization platforms and regulators are aligning now. Tokenization’s promise depends on liquidity, legal certainty, and scalable issuance and custody approaches—areas where regulation and institutional infrastructure can reinforce each other.
RWA.xyz also ranks tokenization platforms by assets under management (AUM). Securitize is listed as the largest tokenization platform with $4.9 billion in tokenized assets under management. Ondo Finance ranks second with $3.5 billion, according to the same data provider.
That competitive positioning is relevant: partnerships between regulators and the leading tokenization players may influence which standards become dominant—especially if regulators prefer structured, institution-ready approaches for tokenized financial products.
Tokenization is spreading beyond the UAE
Dubai’s push comes as tokenization efforts accelerate in other financial technology-focused jurisdictions. A few days before the VARA–Securitize announcement, Cointelegraph reported that the London Stock Exchange partnered with crypto exchange Kraken (via its parent) to launch tokenized stock trading on the operator’s night-time trading venue, with the goal of enabling 24/5 trading.
While the London initiative is focused on tokenized equities rather than RWA-focused tokenization, it reflects a broader trend: traditional market operators are experimenting with tokenized market structures to improve trading continuity and potentially widen access.
For participants, these developments collectively highlight a convergence: regulators and large financial institutions are increasingly treating tokenization as more than a technical experiment—something closer to mainstream market infrastructure.
What to watch next in Dubai
Because the MoU doesn’t include announced projects “at this stage,” the next sign of momentum will likely come from follow-on updates that clarify what the parties will collaborate on and how it maps to tokenized product launches under Dubai’s rules. Market participants should watch for any concrete initiatives that translate the agreement’s framework into regulated offerings—particularly as Dubai’s VASP licensing ecosystem continues to expand.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Reclaims $80,000 as Weak Dollar Meets Suspected Yen Intervention
Bitcoin (BTC) rallied 5% during US trading hours, reaching $81,000.
Key points:
- Bitcoin rallies above $81,000 in US trading, having risen more than 5% over the past 24 hours.
- USD/JPY drops to 155.4 amid suspected Bank of Japan (BOJ) intervention, dragging the US Dollar Index (DXY) down to 99.
- Polymarket odds for a BOJ rate hold collapse further from 12% to 1%, with a 98% probability now priced in for a 25-basis-point hike on Sept. 18.
Weaker dollar drags crypto higher
At the time of writing, BTC stands at $81,000, near the highs seen during last month’s surprise upside.
The move comes as the Japanese yen (JPY) continued to strengthen in a suspected central bank intervention, which Cointelegraph first reported on Wednesday. After dropping to 158.5 on Wednesday, the USD/JPY pair saw further downside to 155.4. This put pressure on the US dollar index (DXY), which fell to 99. Downside in the DXY has historically been positive for Bitcoin.

US Dollar Index 1-day chart. Source: TradingView
Shares of Michael Saylor’s Strategy (MSTR) participated in the rally and rose 8.6% on Wednesday. The stock is up 70% from its lows in late June, but still down roughly 10% year-to-date. Strategy’s perpetual preferred stock STRC, which had been frequently compared to a money market fund, is still trading below its par value of $100 and remains stuck at $97.80 at the time of writing.
Related: Strategy turns 1,690 BTC into $108.6M STRC buyback
Analysts divided on impact of yen intervention
The latest suspected intervention to support the yen, coupled with the prospect of a Bank of Japan rate hike later this month, has also revived fears of another carry-trade unwind. The Macro Paper commented on X:
“In the last 24 hours, USD/JPY has dropped almost 2.5%, which doesn’t happen without any major intervention. On top of that, BOJ is most likely expected to hike rates this month, with more rate hikes possible in Q4,” it wrote.
“This is the exact thing that happened in Q3 2024, when BOJ intervened and hiked rates together. The result was a $5 trillion wipeout from the global markets, and the VIX spiked to its highest level since the Covid crash.”
The Polymarket probabilities for a rate hold dropped from 12% to 1% Wednesday, cementing the prospect of a rate hike. The current market-implied probability of a 25-basis-point rise in the policy rate by the Bank of Japan (BOJ) in the upcoming meeting on September 18 is now 98%.

Polymarket probabilities for BOJ rate decision on Sept 18. Source: Polymarket
Some have also seen the currency intervention as liquidity-positive. Arthur Hayes, CIO of Maelstrom, has long held that the Foreign and International Monetary Authorities’ (FIMA) repo facility will provide Japan with dollar liquidity against Treasury collateral, easing global liquidity conditions. While no funds appear to have been drawn from this facility so far, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent raised the prospect in late July.
Crypto World
Vibe coders faced with frontier AI outage
AI models Claude, Grok, ChatGPT, and Gemini all appear to be experiencing outages today.
Across the board, AI users are claiming that they can’t get the models, run by Anthropic, X, OpenAI, and Google respectively, to work.
Fifteen different services offered by OpenAI are reportedly experiencing issues, which OpenAI is currently trying to fix.
Claude’s status tracker detailed how its Mythos, Fable, and Opus models were affected, and it now claims that its Opus 4.8 and Opus 5 models are experiencing problems.
The rest, it says, “have recovered to baseline error rate.”
Read more: Search engines fix Claude leak but Perplexity users’ files still online
X confirmed that Grok was experiencing issues and that it’s investigating, while Cursor claimed, “All Grok models, automations, cloud agents, Grok bot and review agents” are experiencing “service degradation.”
Google’s status page claims that there haven’t been any issues with Gemini. However, the outage analytics site Down Detector claims it’s had hundreds of reports across the last few hours that indicate it’s not working for some.
None of the AI models have addresed the outage on X at the time of writing.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Crypto World
Uniswap founder sees AMMs entering global finance
Uniswap founder Hayden Adams has argued that correlated tokenized-asset pools could move automated market makers into global finance after 10 stock-SPY pools processed $33 million in 12 days.
Summary
- Ten tokenized stock pools against SPY recorded $33 million in volume from over 11,000 traders.
- Uniswap has processed more than $4.6 trillion since its launch in 2018.
- Adams says correlated assets can reduce inventory risk and lower market-making costs.
- U.S. regulators are considering rules for continuous trading and blockchain-based securities records.
Uniswap founder Hayden Adams, in an Aug. 18 blog post, said tokenization could change which trading pairs attract liquidity and who supplies the capital behind them.
Adams has spent nine years working in decentralized finance and created Uniswap in 2018. The protocol has operated through smart contracts since its launch and has processed more than $4.6 trillion in cumulative volume, according to his post.
During the same period, decentralized exchanges increased their share of centralized-exchange spot volume from below 1% to more than 20%, Adams said. He attributed part of that expansion to automated market makers opening markets for assets that could not attract professional trading firms.
Correlated pairs could reduce market-making risk
Unlike an order-book exchange, an automated market maker lets users place two assets into a shared pool. Traders swap against the pool, prices change according to its programmed rules, and liquidity providers collect part of the trading fees.
Adams said AMMs first found demand among small and less-traded tokens because issuers and early holders could create a pool without hiring a professional market maker. Stablecoin pools followed because assets such as USDC and USDT usually move closely together, limiting the inventory changes faced by passive liquidity providers.
According to Adams, onchain markets have since organized into clusters without a central party deciding their structure. Ethereum-based tokens commonly trade against ETH, Solana assets trade against SOL, and stablecoins form pools with other stablecoins.
“No one designed that. It emerged organically,” Adams wrote.
His argument rests on the relationship between the two assets in a liquidity pool. When their prices move in similar directions, liquidity providers face less risk from holding both sides of the pair. Adams said lower inventory risk can attract more capital, deepen liquidity, and reduce the performance advantage enjoyed by active trading firms.
Traditional market makers usually hedge price exposure through options or other instruments, which adds costs. Investors who already want to own both assets may not need the same hedge, allowing them to accept lower returns while continuing to provide liquidity, according to Adams.
Tokenized SPY pools create a bridge to individual stocks
Tokenized securities can allow stocks and funds to trade directly against each other on a shared blockchain rather than requiring every transaction to settle against dollars.
Using Nvidia as an example, Adams said an NVDA-SPY pool could replace part of the activity normally routed through NVDA-USD. SPY would then connect the stock pool to dollars through a separate SPY-USD market.
Under that model, the individual stock and the index fund would form the correlated pair, while SPY-USD would act as a bridge. Passive liquidity providers could serve pools holding related assets, while professional firms compete in the smaller number of bridge markets that carry concentrated trading volume.
Automatic routing would still let an investor enter or leave a position in dollars. The trade could move through more than one pool in the background without requiring the user to exchange each asset manually.
Adams pointed to 10 tokenized stocks trading against tokenized SPY through Uniswap pools on Robinhood Chain. During their first 12 days, the pools handled $33 million in volume from more than 11,000 traders, with part of the activity occurring while U.S. stock exchanges were closed.
Some transactions moved directly from one tokenized stock to another without using dollars, he added. Adams presented the activity as an early example of related assets forming direct markets once they share the same settlement network.
More unusual pools have also appeared. According to his post, some memecoins have been paired with stocks linked by a common theme, including Elon Musk-themed tokens against Tesla and hot dog-themed tokens against Costco. Adams cautioned that the price correlation in such pools remains uncertain.
Uniswap v4 expands how liquidity pools operate
Technical changes to Uniswap could determine whether passive pools can compete in markets that require more complex trading rules.
Uniswap v4 introduced hooks, which allow developers to add custom functions to a pool. Adams cited DualPool, a hook designed to place unused liquidity into lending markets between swaps, as one way to improve returns for liquidity providers.
Permissioned pools provide another route for tokenized assets that must enforce eligibility or transfer controls. Under such a structure, programmed checks can limit who trades a regulated asset while the pool continues to use an AMM for execution.
In July, Uniswap governance expanded its fee system to v4 pools across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, OP Mainnet, and Robinhood Chain. As crypto.news previously reported, the change raised daily protocol revenue from about $114,000 to $325,000.
The report found that Uniswap processed $27.6 billion in April 2026 volume and generated an estimated $845 million in annual fees across its versions and networks. Roughly one-sixth of those fees were being captured by the protocol through TokenJar contracts used for UNI purchases and burns.
Adams said correlated pairs represent only one part of the AMM model. Pool design, capital costs, and the ability to handle regulated assets will also affect whether automated liquidity can compete with firms that operate proprietary trading, hedging, and settlement systems.
U.S. rules will determine access to tokenized stocks
For American investors, a token that follows a stock price does not always provide direct ownership of the underlying share. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said in January that tokenized securities can be issued by the company itself or created by an unrelated third party, with different legal structures attached to each model.
Issuer-backed tokens may update the company’s official shareholder record when the blockchain asset moves. A third-party token could instead provide an indirect claim, a custodial interest, or economic exposure that does not make its holder a registered shareholder.
The distinction affects voting rights, dividends, corporate actions, and claims during insolvency. In August, the SEC began preparing a limited route for 24/7 tokenized trading, although the commission has not finalized eligibility standards or an implementation date.
Nasdaq received SEC approval in March 2026 for a pilot covering eligible Russell 1000 shares and major index-linked exchange-traded funds. Under its approved structure, the tokenized and conventional forms carry the same rights and pricing within the national market system.
Ownership infrastructure remains another part of the U.S. regulatory work. In September, the SEC proposed a transfer-agent rule overhaul covering digital records, cybersecurity, business continuity, and the protection of investor assets.
Transfer agents maintain the official list of security owners and process changes involving dividends, stock splits, and other corporate actions. The SEC said firms are developing blockchain-based ownership systems, tokenized fund services and smart-contract processes, but described its proposal as technology-neutral.
Traditional market operators are also building systems for onchain securities. Intercontinental Exchange agreed in August to invest in tZERO and use its blockchain patents while developing an NYSE-affiliated platform. The ICE-tZERO partnership covers digital transfer-agent and broker-dealer infrastructure for issuing, trading, and settling public securities onchain.
ICE and tZERO did not disclose the investment amount, tZERO’s valuation, or a launch schedule. The proposed platform still requires regulatory approvals before it can offer continuous trading and blockchain settlement.
Crypto World
Gloria Steinem Brought Women Together to Change the World
In the beginning, there was the famous story about the young journalist Gloria Steinem, going undercover in 1963 as a Playboy Bunny, all décolletage and rabbit ears, in order to expose a culture of degradation and misogyny. The Bunny episode is certainly the Steinem anecdote most often cited, but it’s such an early story that it’s just a canary, really, hinting only a little at what would become a lifelong commitment to feminism.
Steinem, who died Sept. 2 in her home in New York City at the age of 92, was an icon of second-wave feminism. As one of the co-founders, in 1971, of both Ms. magazine and, along with many other feminists, the National Women’s Political Caucus, Steinem advocated fiercely and vocally on behalf of women’s rights. She was also involved in the fight for the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment.
But she didn’t consider her life as an “active feminist” to have started until 1969, when in her mid-30s she attended an abortion speak-out in a church basement. Steinem was there as a reporter for New York magazine, but found herself struck by the stories the women told, and the truths that they were willing to reveal in front of other people. She had her own truth, which she came to share.

Some years ago, she personalized the story further, in the dedication of her 2015 book, My Life on the Road, which reads:
This book is dedicated to:
Dr. John Sharpe of London, who in 1957, a decade before physicians in England could legally perform an abortion for any reason other than the health of the woman, took the considerable risk of referring for an abortion a twenty-two-year-old American on her way to India.
Knowing only that she had broken an engagement at home to seek an unknown fate, he said, “You must promise me two things. First, you will not tell anyone my name. Second, you will do what you want to do with your life.”
Dear Dr. Sharpe, I believe you, who knew the law was unjust, would not mind if I say this so long after your death:
I’ve done the best I could with my life.
This book is for you.
What is it that makes these words so moving? There was always something real and approachable about Steinem, visible in this dedication as well as in the interviews she gave and the speeches she delivered. You felt you knew her, or you wished you did. You even imagined being her, just a little.
I definitely had feelings along those lines toward Steinem. As a teenager I watched my own mother, a writer who hadn’t been encouraged by her parents to explore her talents fully or go to college, become truly affected by the women’s movement, publishing her first novel in her mid-40s. We subscribed to Ms., and I became part of a consciousness-raising group in school. Though the term “consciousness raising” can feel outdated, I still remember those conversations the other girls and I had. Someone would bring over a container of Lipton’s onion dip and a bag of chips, and we would go around the room speaking about subjects that until then had been kept inside, connected with what we had thought of as privacy, but which in some instances was really shame.
Later on, I was excited to win the Ms. magazine college fiction contest; and still later the writer Mary Gordon invited me to attend Steinem’s 50th birthday party with her. In addition to being overstimulated and thrilled at seeing Steinem, I am pretty sure I also saw Carol Burnett, Sally Ride, and Rosa Parks—if that tells you anything about Steinem’s reach. Beyond that, it was so heady that I can’t tell you much of anything.
“In my old age—really old age, since I’m going to live past 100, I hope,” Steinem once said in an interview with New York magazine, “I would love to have a diner.” She envisioned it as having “blue gingham curtains” and being “by the side of the road,” and she went on to explain: “Diners are the most democratic places. Everyone goes—truck drivers go, people from the neighborhood, people in their tuxes after parties go… And in the back room,” she said, “we could have a little revolutionary meeting from time to time.”
Steinem never actually had a diner, although you could make the case that she did have a sort of symbolic one, because her life’s work involved bringing all kinds of people together to talk, often to touch on matters of radical societal change. She seemed to be everywhere, from the nightly news to a mention on The Mary Tyler Moore Show. The warmth and genuineness of her personality, as well as her convictions, breadth of knowledge and experience, and her talents both as a writer and speaker, helped make her a reliable figure over all the decades she spent working for women’s equality. In 2013, Barack Obama presented her with a Presidential Medal of Freedom.



The expression “the personal is political” easily comes to mind when thinking of Steinem, whose own origin story strongly shaped her inclination toward activism. Born on March 25, 1934 in Toledo, Ohio, Steinem lived with her mother Ruth after her parents’ divorce, becoming, at 10, the sole caretaker for her mother, who struggled with mental illness. Among Ruth’s many other challenges was keeping a job. Feminism was in Steinem’s DNA (her father’s mother was involved with women’s suffrage and was the first woman elected to the Toledo Board of Education), but Steinem later realized that witnessing the contempt and disregard that people in power expressed toward her mother—seeing how she was treated as invisible—became a formative social justice experience for her.
She took her percolating consciousness off to Smith College, the all-women’s school in Northampton, Mass., where she studied government. But Smith in the 1950s, while academically rigorous, was also sometimes described by its critics as a place where students went to get their “MRS” degrees. This, Steinem knew, was not something she wanted for herself. As she once told People magazine, “In the 1950s, once you married you became what your husband was, so it seemed like the last choice you’d ever have.” She added, “I’d already been the very small parent of a very big child, my mother. I didn’t want to end up taking care of someone else.” (Steinem did eventually marry, but not until her 60s.)
Being responsible for her mother not only molded her convictions about what she didn’t want, but also seems to have allowed her to figure out, earlier than other people, what she did want. And one thing she apparently wanted was experience. Steinem got that, traveling to India on a fellowship; then, later, at Ms., and as a journalist, mentor, and speaker to audiences around the world. Along the way, the glamorous Steinem had a well-documented love life that sometimes involved relationships with powerful men. Her stylishness––the signature aviator glasses and great hair––combined with her intelligence and political engagement, challenged retrograde and insulting ideas about graceless, unappealing feminists.



It would not be an overstatement to call Steinem the “face” of second-wave feminism, whether it was her preference or not to be known that way. Steinem believed that her personal formation as a feminist had been importantly shaped by Black women. “I thought that they invented the feminist movement,” she said in 2015. “I realize that things being what they are, the white, middle-class part of the movement got reported more.” Throughout her life, both personally and politically, she was sensitive to the needs of various groups whose interests had been sidelined.
Steinem seemed to capture the feminist imagination in profound ways across decades, often acting as a convener of women. She was known for the “talking circles” frequently held in her home. In 2009, I received an invitation to her house in New York City for a reception to celebrate the filmmaker Jane Campion. Various women in the arts had been invited, and Steinem went around and briefly described everyone’s work, one by one. I suppose “networking” took place that night, but that seems too corporate a term for what I experienced, which was a series of good conversations with women I admired, in the home of someone who mattered to us all. She somehow had time for all of this—more time, even as the clock sped up the way it seems to do as you get older, before it inevitably slows down, then stops.
I had cause to think of Steinem again some years ago when talking to a friend, the novelist J. Courtney Sullivan, who in fact I met for the first time that night at Steinem’s. Sullivan was a core member of the all-volunteer group Immigrant Families Together, which worked to reunite mothers and children who had been separated at the U.S.-Mexico border. In 2018 she sent out a mass email, looking for housing for immigrant women and their children. She told me she sent 50 emails, and at that point received only one response in which the person volunteered her own home. It was from Steinem, who told Sullivan, in effect: Any of those mothers and their children are welcome to stay in my house for as long as they need.
Crypto World
How Democrats Are Pushing for a Supreme Court Overhaul
The conservative Justices have denied that the court’s decisions are politically motivated.
“I think, at a very basic level, people think we’re making policy decisions, we’re saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides,” said Chief Justice John Roberts at an event in May. “I think they view us as purely political actors, which I don’t think is an accurate understanding of what we do.”
The past few months have nonetheless seen Democratic lawmakers proposing other ways to revamp the court in an attempt to weed out partisan politics and rein in judicial powers. Here are some of those efforts:
Ongoing discussions over court size
The U.S. Constitution does not state how many Justices make up the Supreme Court, and the number of seats has changed over time, from as few as five Justices to as many as 10. Since 1869, however, the court has had nine authorized seats for Justices.
Crypto World
Pencil Finance wraps $1M on-chain lending cycle for 6.6K SEA students
Student-loan infrastructure startup Pencil Finance says it has completed a fully onchain lending cycle worth $1 million, financing education borrowers in Southeast Asia and repaying investors via smart-contract-recorded cash flows.
In a Thursday announcement shared with Cointelegraph, Pencil described the milestone as its first “fully onchain” student loan cycle—one where the protocol deployed $1 million of lender capital on-chain and borrowers’ repayments flowed back to funders through a structured yield distribution.
Key takeaways
- Pencil Finance completed a $1 million student-loan cycle recorded on-chain, marking its first fully onchain deployment for this use case.
- The July 2025 bundle was funded by Animoca Brands, Open Campus, and New Campus, with senior fixed returns and a junior variable tranche tied to first-loss risk.
- The loans supported around 6,600 students across 118 schools and universities in Southeast Asia, with about 1,050 receiving direct funding.
- Pencil says the majority of borrowers were women (50%) and that 93% came from lower-income households—targeting students underserved by traditional lending.
- The announcement highlights growing interest in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) for lending, including examples outside education.
How Pencil’s first onchain loan cycle worked
Pencil Finance said the protocol launched the $1 million loan cycle as an onchain bundle that functioned like a lender-to-borrower pipeline. Instead of keeping core loan accounting off-chain, the platform recorded the cycle on a blockchain network, where capital was deployed by lenders and later repaid by borrowers to distribute yield back to funders.
The project framed this as a proof point for transparency in credit: because the lending cycle is executed and tracked on-chain, investors and participants can follow the protocol’s operations through recorded transactions rather than relying entirely on traditional reporting channels.
What the tranche structure covered
According to the announcement, the $1 million bundle was funded in July 2025 by Animoca Brands, Open Campus, and New Campus. Pencil said the financing was organized into two tranches with different risk and return profiles.
The senior tranche offered fixed returns, while the junior tranche carried variable returns and bore first-loss risk. This type of waterfall structure is commonly used in tokenized and structured finance to allocate losses first to the riskiest portion of capital, potentially improving the risk profile of senior participants—while still exposing junior investors to performance variability.
Scale, eligibility, and who received support
Pencil Finance said the onchain student loan cycle financed approximately 6,600 students across 118 schools and universities in Southeast Asia. The company noted that around 1,050 of those students received direct funding under the cycle.
As for borrower demographics, Pencil reported that 50% of funded students were female and that 93% came from lower-income households. The company positioned these figures as evidence that the program is reaching applicants who are often overlooked by conventional lending, where credit access can be constrained by documentation requirements, limited credit history, or geographic and income barriers.
Notably, Pencil claimed the project is the first-ever “fully onchain” lending cycle financing student loans with transparent recording on a blockchain network—an emphasis that matters because tokenized RWA lending is still frequently debated on how transparent and auditable it truly is compared with established financial processes.
Why tokenized loans are gaining attention
Tokenized RWAs are increasingly being used to issue or collateralize loans, and Pencil’s announcement fits into a broader trend of trying to bring more of the lending lifecycle on-chain. The education-focused milestone also echoes how other markets are experimenting with onchain representations of real-world exposures.
For example, earlier coverage from Cointelegraph noted that in July, Brazil’s B3 stock exchange issued a 100,000 Brazilian reais (about $19,600) loan secured by 10 tokenized cows. In that structure, each cow was linked to a unique digital token tied to an encrypted digital identity, while AI-powered smart collars from agriculture tech company Cowmed monitored animal health.
While student loans and farm-asset-backed credit are fundamentally different, both examples point to the same underlying goal: encode key parts of credit risk and reporting into tokenized systems to improve traceability and potentially reduce the friction between traditional assets and onchain capital.
What to watch next
With Pencil Finance now pointing to a completed first fully onchain student loan cycle, the next questions for readers and potential participants are whether subsequent cycles sustain repayment performance at scale and how tranche design evolves as more borrowers—especially underserved groups—enter the system.
Crypto World
Kraken’s Payward Taps SoFi for Stablecoin and 24/7 Settlement
Kraken’s parent company, Payward, has signed a partnership with SoFi aimed at linking Kraken’s exchange infrastructure with SoFi’s dollar settlement rails and bringing the SoFiUSD stablecoin into Kraken’s ecosystem. The deal connects SoFi’s 24/7 US dollar settlement network with Kraken Prime, Kraken’s institutional-grade execution venue.
Under the collaboration, SoFi will route eligible digital-asset orders through Kraken Prime’s smart order routing to source liquidity across multiple trading venues. Payward, meanwhile, will join SoFi’s SoFi Exchange Network (SEN) and gain access to SoFi’s business banking services, with the companies saying additional custody services could be added as the relationship expands.
Key takeaways
- SoFi plans to use Kraken Prime as an additional liquidity source by routing digital-asset orders through Kraken’s smart order routing.
- Payward will connect to SoFi’s SoFi Exchange Network (SEN) for access to round-the-clock US dollar settlement.
- The partnership introduces SoFiUSD to Kraken, with the stablecoin issued by SoFi Bank and backed by reserves held in cash and short-term US Treasurys.
- Both firms indicated custody-related services could be incorporated later, suggesting an expanding scope beyond execution and settlement.
- The move fits Payward and Kraken’s broader strategy to build deeper ties with traditional finance and tokenized markets.
How the Kraken–SoFi link is designed
Kraken described the collaboration in a Thursday blog post, explaining that SoFi will route digital asset orders through Kraken Prime. Kraken Prime uses smart order routing to assess pricing and market depth across supported venues in real time, then send orders to the venue most likely to achieve the best fill.
Kraken said this matters because it helps SoFi avoid relying on a single order book for execution. With access to liquidity across multiple venues, SoFi can potentially improve execution quality—especially when markets are fragmented or liquidity conditions change quickly.
The partnership also extends to settlement. Kraken’s institutional and business clients will be able to use SEN, according to the companies, enabling US dollar settlement on a 24/7 basis. For participants used to digital-asset trading hours, around-the-clock settlement is a practical improvement: it reduces downtime between trading and funding/settlement cycles and can streamline cross-platform operations.
SoFiUSD arrives at Kraken
A central element of the agreement is the stablecoin itself. SoFiUSD is issued by SoFi Bank and is described as a dollar-backed stablecoin launched in 2026 for payments and settlement. The companies say SoFiUSD reserves are held in cash and short-term US Treasurys.
By bringing SoFiUSD to Kraken, the partnership effectively broadens the set of dollar-denominated settlement and payment options available to traders and institutions interacting with Kraken’s venues. While the article does not specify which custody or issuance workflows will be added first, the direction is clear: SoFiUSD is positioned as a key bridge asset between the banking-oriented settlement network and crypto trading infrastructure.
Kraken also indicated that qualified custody services could be added as the partnership matures. That point is important for institutional users, because custody and settlement capabilities are often treated as linked requirements in digital-asset operations—especially for firms that need compliance-aligned processes across multiple stages of trading and asset handling.
SoFi’s customer reach meets Kraken’s institutional rails
SoFi already has a large consumer base and offers crypto trading through its app, and Kraken Prime is presented as an additional path for sourcing liquidity rather than a complete replacement of existing execution methods. The companies said SoFi routes eligible trades through Kraken Prime, giving SoFi access to liquidity beyond any single execution venue.
Kraken’s role in SEN is similarly framed as an infrastructure upgrade for clients. By connecting to the SoFi Exchange Network, Kraken and its institutional and business customers can potentially take advantage of round-the-clock US dollar settlement through a banking-linked network—an increasingly important capability as more platforms seek to reduce operational friction in digital-asset markets.
From an investor and operator perspective, the practical value of such connectivity is less about headline integration and more about what changes in daily operations: faster and more continuous settlement options, the ability to execute orders against deeper liquidity pools, and a stablecoin that is explicitly designed for payments and settlement.
Part of a wider push beyond pure crypto
This partnership follows other efforts by Payward and Kraken to broaden their connections to traditional finance. Earlier reporting noted that London Stock Exchange Group reportedly partnered with Payward to offer tokenized versions of leading UK equities through LSE 24, a new 24/5 trading venue set to launch in 2027. Separately, Kraken has added round-the-clock exposure to the S&P 500 through its funded trading program, with commodities expected to follow.
Kraken has also expanded into tokenized public markets via xStocks, the tokenized equities platform developed by Backed Finance, which Kraken acquired in early 2026. Kraken has used xStocks to provide eligible users exposure to share-linked offerings tied to SpaceX and Jersey Mike’s IPO activity, in some cases including direct share allocations.
In the background is Payward’s plan to become a public company. The company reportedly submitted a draft registration statement to the US Securities and Exchange Commission in November 2025, though reports indicate the earliest possible listing timing has been pushed to the second quarter of 2027.
Taken together, the Kraken–SoFi deal reinforces a theme: rather than treating stablecoins, execution, and settlement as separate silos, Payward is building bridges between banking-grade settlement networks and crypto trading infrastructure. If that strategy continues, stablecoins like SoFiUSD and networks like SEN could become more central to how institutions operationalize digital-asset trading—particularly for firms that want 24/7 dollar rails aligned with regulated financial workflows.
Going forward, readers should watch how quickly the partnership expands into additional custody services and how widely Kraken’s institutional clients adopt SEN for continuous US dollar settlement. The next question for the market is whether integrations of this kind—linking bank-adjacent settlement, smart order execution, and dollar-backed stablecoins—become the default operating model for large exchanges and financial platforms.
Crypto World
Uber, Lyft Face New Rival, As Asia Rideshare App Plans U.S. Entry
Uber and Lyft may soon have a new U.S. competitor. The Vietnamese rideshare company Green and Smart Mobility (GSM) plans a U.S. and European expansion by the end of this year. GSM is partnered with Vietnam’s largest automaker VinFast (VFS), which supplies all of the service’s vehicles. GSM is owned by VinFast CEO Pham Nhat Vuong. The plan is to…
Copyright ©2026 Investor’s Business Daily, LLC. All rights reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Crypto World
CLARITY Act Could be Delayed Again as Senate Cuts 8 Voting Days
The US Senate has 8 fewer voting days in September after House Republicans shortened the calendar today. This could mean less floor time to move the CLARITY Act this month.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins pointed to a September 15 Senate vote on Wednesday. Crypto markets had spent the recess waiting for exactly that date.
Why Crypto Was Counting on September 15
The CLARITY Act would split oversight of digital assets between the SEC and CFTC. It would also formally ban any US government official or their spouses from holding or promoting crypto. That includes the president.
With the bill gaining momentum in August, enthusiasm for crypto returned on both retail and Wall Street. Bitcoin ETFs saw $3.3 billion come in, despite losing $4.5 billion in June. Bitcoin price (BTC) climbed 25.7% as treasury firms resumed buying.
President Donald Trump pressed Congress on August 19 to pass the bill. The Senate had already gone into recess without acting, which pushed the decision to September.
What the September 15 Vote Actually Decides
The vote is a cloture motion, the step that ends a filibuster and opens formal debate. It needs 60 senators and starts Senate consideration rather than finishing it.
The House passed its version in July 2025 by 294 to 134. Senate committees then wrote their own text. Those versions still must be merged with the House bill before anything reaches Trump.
Committee arithmetic has already exposed the CLARITY Act’s fragile path, including a 12 to 11 party-line vote in Senate Agriculture.
“The Regulation Crypto Assets proposal is our most historic step yet to cement America as the Crypto Capital of the World … and is consonant with our belief that Congress should send the CLARITY Act to the President’s desk,” Atkins said in a post.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Atkins says the SEC’s proposed new crypto offering rules need a statute behind them to survive a future commission.
Why the House Calendar Now Points to November
The current week ends Thursday. Four voting days then remain after the Labor Day recess, in the week that contains September 15.
Members had been scheduled to work through October 1, per Bloomberg Government. Canceling the weeks of September 21 and September 28 pulled that finish line forward by roughly two weeks.
So the House sits in Washington for the cloture vote and leaves days later. Should senators amend the bill in late September, the revised text will arrive in an empty chamber.
The next scheduled voting day is November 9, six days after the midterms. That pushes any second House vote into a post-election session with a different political calculation.
Atkins can only ask. The September 15 count matters less than one later question. Will House leaders spend a November floor slot on a crypto bill?
The post CLARITY Act Could be Delayed Again as Senate Cuts 8 Voting Days appeared first on BeInCrypto.
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Maeve – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin’s 22% rally now needs real demand to outlast Treasury liquidity boost
-
Business7 days agoApple Confirms September 9 Keynote and Reveals Its Full Pre-Order Schedule
-
Crypto World19 hours agoCLARITY Act could advance within weeks, Atkins says
-
Business7 days agoSalesforce Stock Soars 19% as Blowout Earnings and Agentforce AI Growth Silence Software Skeptics
-
Business6 days agoOnto Innovation Stock: AI’s Next Bottleneck Is Yield (NYSE:ONTO)
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin price tests $82K resistance as Brandt stays long
-
Tech5 days agoHugging Face built a $4.5 billion empire on free AI models. Now Nvidia is buying it for $12.9 billion
-
Business6 days agoiPhone 18 Pro Pre-Orders Could Shift to Saturday as Apple Reportedly Avoids September 11 Anniversary
-
Crypto World2 days agoElon Musk Says Grok 4.7 Lands in 10 Days and Will Beat Every Model
-
Crypto World7 days agoTruflation calls for Fed rate cut after PCE forecast
-
Entertainment6 days ago‘Adults’ Creators Break Down Season 2’s Most Shocking Moments and Tease a Potential Season 3
-
Tech7 days agoThe fix for the AI agent that hijacked a company’s DNS: it can propose the change, but it can’t approve it
-
News Videos4 days agoCharlie Munger on Robinhood: No one should believe that Robinhood’s trades are free
-
Tech6 days agoPaperCut releases second emergency patch for exploited flaws
-
Tech5 days agoTamagotchi Ring Takes the 30-Year Digital Pet and Places it on Your Finger
-
Tech5 days agoAs the influencer economy drives retail sales, Seattle startup raises $22M to play matchmaker
-
Crypto World2 days agoBitcoin slips below $77.5K as macro pressure offsets ETF inflows
-
Crypto World14 hours agoKalshi seeks CFTC approval for WTI perpetual
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTrump posts AI video of ‘Lake America’ being protected by an army of bequiffed ‘Donald Ducks’

You must be logged in to post a comment Login