Bitcoin BIP Editor Mark “Murch” Erhardt called for Luke Dashjr’s removal from the editorial team on Aug. 9, escalating a dispute over Dashjr’s handling of BIP110 and the proposal’s recent chain split. 

Murch posted the motion to the Bitcoin Development Mailing List and then opened GitHub pull request 2248 as a proposed implementation.

Dashjr rejected the allegations less than an hour after Murch’s mailing list post. As of Aug. 10, the removal PR remained open, while the current BIP3 document continued to list Dashjr alongside five other BIP Editors. No removal has taken place.

Murch ties the removal motion to BIP110’s editorial process

Murch alleged that Dashjr exercised his editorial authority inconsistently while being closely involved with BIP110. He cited an attempt to assign the proposal a BIP number publicly before mailing list discussion and a later merge completed within minutes of a related pull request opening. Murch also claimed Dashjr produced fewer than 1% of BIP Editor comments after additional editors began serving in April 2024.

The current BIP3 process says authors should present an idea and draft to the Bitcoin Development Mailing List before formal submission. Editors then check that the proposal received prior discussion, assign a BIP number in the pull request and merge it when ready. The document describes the position as administrative and editorial and says editors do not decide whether a proposal is likely to gain adoption.

Murch also alleged that communication between Dashjr and the other editors had broken down. He framed the matter as a conflict between Dashjr’s editorial responsibilities and his involvement in advancing BIP110. Those are Murch’s allegations, rather than findings from a formal Bitcoin governing body.

Dashjr denies claims as contributors debate removal

Dashjr disputed Murch’s account. “These are false accusations,” he wrote, adding that he had consistently followed the BIP process. Dashjr also challenged Murch’s account of their communication breakdown and argued that Murch should instead lose his editor position.

Other contributors backed the removal request. Bitcoin developer Matt Corallo supported removing Dashjr, while fellow BIP Editor Olaoluwa Osuntokun formally seconded Murch’s motion. Osuntokun said his support centered on what he viewed as bypassing editorial procedures rather than punishing a developer for advocating a controversial proposal.

However, the discussion also exposed a procedural gap. Jameson Lopp said there was no formal governance structure covering management of BIP Editors. Antoine Riard supported Dashjr stepping aside, potentially temporarily, but argued that contributors should allow time for a public response and establish clearer procedures before resolving the dispute.

BIP110 chain split adds pressure to the editor dispute

The dispute follows BIP110 entering mandatory signaling at block 961,632 on Aug. 8. Only 51 of the previous 2,016 blocks, or 2.53%, had signaled support. As crypto.news reported in coverage of the mandatory signaling split, enforcing nodes created a minority branch that produced two blocks before stalling.

A later snapshot covered in the branch’s widening gap showed the dominant Bitcoin chain 111 blocks ahead, with no BIP110 signals among its first 113 blocks of the new difficulty period. BIP110 itself is a temporary consensus proposal intended to restrict certain forms of arbitrary transaction data.

Murch said the project “appears to evolve into a hard fork,” but that description should not be treated as a confirmed next step. Experimental proof of work change code exists, but its maintainer Chris Guida has described it as contingency code and said no activation date has been set. Earlier coverage of Dashjr’s backing also documented his support for the proposal amid opposition from other Bitcoin participants.

What happens next for Dashjr and BIP110

The immediate issue is pull request 2248. It remains open and currently proposes removing Dashjr from BIP3’s list of editors. BIP3 still names six editors, including Dashjr, and describes the BIPs repository as a publication and archive rather than a governing body that decides Bitcoin development or adoption.

A second open proposal is addressing BIP110 itself. Pull request 2245 seeks to change its status from Complete through Deployed to Closed following the stalled activation attempt. The discussion remains unresolved, and the live BIP110 specification still labels the proposal Complete.

The two open requests now leave Bitcoin contributors with separate questions: whether BIP110 should be formally closed and whether Dashjr should retain editorial access. There is currently no published deadline for resolving the removal motion, and the mailing list discussion has not produced a formal decision.

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper urged senators to pass the CLARITY Act, arguing in a Financial Times op-ed that digital asset market structure should be treated as a national security issue as well as a financial regulatory question. 

Esper argued that China is building payment infrastructure outside U.S. oversight and that North Korean cyber actors continue exploiting digital assets.

His intervention comes just as the Senate has set the bill’s next procedural step. Majority Leader John Thune filed cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633 before the chamber began its August recess. The Senate Radio TV Correspondents Gallery says the vote is scheduled for 2:15 p.m. ET on Sept. 15, one day after senators return for regular business. It is a vote on whether to advance consideration, not final passage.

Esper frames the CLARITY Act as a security issue

Esper described the legislation as “not merely a financial services bill” but also a “national security bill.” He argued that bringing more digital asset activity under U.S. rules could improve law enforcement visibility, support sanctions enforcement and reduce incentives for crypto businesses to operate through lightly regulated foreign venues. Those are Esper’s policy arguments rather than independent findings about the bill’s eventual effects.

The former defense secretary pointed to North Korea’s Lazarus Group as one example. U.S. Treasury records identify Lazarus as a North Korean state sponsored cyber group and have linked it to major cryptocurrency thefts, including the roughly $620 million Ronin bridge attack. Esper also argued that Chinese payment alternatives could weaken U.S. financial leverage, although that assessment remains his geopolitical argument.

Esper’s industry ties are also relevant context. Coinbase currently lists him on its Global Advisory Council, which advises the exchange’s leadership. He joined the council in 2023 alongside other former national security officials.

Latest bill text gives Treasury new digital asset tools

The Senate’s July 22 merged text gives part of Esper’s argument a direct legislative basis. Section 10303 would amend 31 U.S.C. 5318A, the statute implementing Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, by adding a new special measure covering certain digital asset fund transfers.

Under the proposal, Treasury could prohibit or place conditions on transfers involving foreign jurisdictions, financial institutions or transaction classes found to present a primary money laundering concern connected to digital assets. Treasury describes existing Section 311 authority as a tool for protecting the U.S. financial system from money laundering and terrorist financing threats.

The 616 page draft also contains a dedicated illicit finance title, studies of foreign adversary activity, digital asset law enforcement training and provisions for international cooperation against illicit finance. Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott has likewise argued that the measure would make it harder for criminals and foreign adversaries to exploit the financial system.

Critics dispute whether the bill strengthens security enough

The national security case remains contested. During the May Senate Banking markup, ranking member Elizabeth Warren argued that the then current draft could instead increase national security risks. She cited concerns over DeFi, illicit finance enforcement and protections for noncontrolling software developers.

The National Sheriffs’ Association raised related objections in a May letter, warning that parts of the earlier proposal could restrict law enforcement’s ability to pursue illicit transfers involving mixers and decentralized systems. Those comments addressed the May draft, while the July version added and reorganized several law enforcement and illicit finance provisions.

The competing arguments mean Esper’s characterization should not be presented as bipartisan consensus. Supporters view clearer rules and expanded Treasury powers as strengthening U.S. security, while critics continue questioning whether exemptions elsewhere in the legislation could weaken enforcement.

Sept. 15 becomes the next CLARITY Act test

The House passed the CLARITY Act 294 to 134 in July 2025. The Senate Banking Committee later advanced its version 15 to 9 in May 2026.

As crypto.news reported in the September vote update, Thune’s cloture filing keeps the legislation moving after senators failed to complete consideration before recess. The Sept. 15 vote is therefore the next measurable test of whether leaders can assemble enough bipartisan support to move into floor debate.

The calendar remains difficult. In Grayscale’s latest assessment, research head Zach Pandl said passage during 2026 now appears unlikely because of the compressed Senate calendar and election year politics. That remains an assessment, not a determination of the bill’s outcome.

Esper’s intervention adds a former defense secretary’s voice to the security argument, but it does not settle the remaining legislative disputes. The Sept. 15 procedural vote will show whether that broader framing helps the CLARITY Act secure enough support to move further through the Senate.

Australia’s financial intelligence agency has suspended Cryptolink’s crypto ATM operations for three months after finding failures in transaction reporting and raising ongoing concerns over the company’s handling of high-risk activity.

According to the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, Cryptolink’s registration as a virtual asset service provider was suspended from Aug. 9, preventing the company from operating its 96 Bitcoin ATMs during the three-month period.

AUSTRAC CEO Brendan Thomas said the regulator remained concerned about Cryptolink’s ability to manage high-risk transactions through its crypto ATMs. The latest action follows an enforceable undertaking imposed on the operator in October 2025 over separate compliance failures identified by the agency’s Cryptocurrency Taskforce.

Cryptolink operates machines that allow customers to exchange cash for Bitcoin, with most of its 96 Australian ATMs located in major cities including Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.

Cryptolink crypto ATMs suspended over reporting failures

In outlining the reasons for the suspension, AUSTRAC said Cryptolink had failed to meet basic reporting requirements, particularly its obligations involving threshold transaction reports.

The company also failed to respond to an information request from the regulator, according to AUSTRAC.

“As part of our continued focus on digital currency as a money laundering risk, AUSTRAC has ongoing concerns about the company’s ability to manage high-risk transactions through its CATMs,” Thomas said.

Cryptolink had already been subject to regulatory action before the suspension. In October 2025, the company entered into an enforceable undertaking with AUSTRAC after the agency’s Cryptocurrency Taskforce identified alleged breaches involving late transaction reporting and shortcomings in its risk assessments.

AUSTRAC also issued Cryptolink an infringement notice worth A$56,340 as part of the earlier enforcement action. The company subsequently paid the penalty.

The three-month registration suspension now prevents Cryptolink from providing the registered virtual asset services covered by the order, effectively taking its Australian Bitcoin ATM network offline for the duration of the suspension.

Australia has tightened controls on crypto ATMs

Cryptolink’s suspension comes after more than a year of regulatory scrutiny of Australia’s crypto ATM sector, which has expanded rapidly while attracting attention from financial crime authorities.

Australia has the largest crypto ATM market in the Asia-Pacific region. Speaking at the National Press Club in Canberra in October 2025, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the number of machines had increased from 23 six years earlier to about 2,000.

Burke said Australia had become the world’s third-largest crypto ATM market at the time, while authorities had linked some activity involving the machines to scams, fraud, money laundering, illicit drug transactions and other criminal activity.

Citing AUSTRAC data, Burke said 85% of funds passing through crypto ATMs among the highest-volume users were associated with scams or money mules.

AUSTRAC had started increasing its scrutiny of operators months earlier. In March 2025, the agency warned crypto ATM providers about compliance with Australia’s anti-money laundering rules before conducting targeted investigations into the sector.

By June, the regulator had introduced a A$5,000 cash transaction limit for crypto ATM deposits and withdrawals. Operators were also required to conduct stronger customer due diligence and place scam warnings at their machines.

At the time, Thomas said the conditions were intended to protect consumers from scams while reducing the ability of criminals to exploit crypto ATM businesses.

Crypto ATM scams have caused millions in losses

Authorities have also documented cases in which scammers directed victims to crypto ATMs to transfer money.

Tasmania Police reported in July 2025 that 15 victims had lost an estimated A$2.5 million through scams involving crypto ATMs. The average victim was 65 years old and lost about A$165,000, while one person lost A$750,000.

Detective Sergeant Turner said some victims suffered consequences that affected retirement plans and forced them to sell assets before relying on social support payments.

Police identified romance scams, investment fraud, impersonation of government authorities and technology support scams among the methods used against the victims. In such cases, fraudsters persuaded or pressured victims to deposit cash at crypto ATMs and send the resulting digital assets to wallets controlled by the scammers.

The transfers created an additional problem for victims because cryptocurrency transactions sent to a scammer-controlled wallet generally cannot be reversed through the mechanisms available for some traditional financial transfers.

Australia’s response stopped short of the approach adopted across the Tasman Sea. New Zealand announced a ban on crypto ATMs in June 2025 as part of measures intended to prevent criminals from converting illicit cash into digital assets.

Australian authorities instead moved toward tighter limits, customer checks and regulatory supervision of operators.

AUSTRAC has expanded crypto transfer requirements

Regulatory requirements for Australian crypto businesses have continued to develop outside the ATM sector as well.

From July 1, 2026, Australia’s crypto travel rule introduced additional data requirements for virtual asset transfers handled by regulated businesses. AUSTRAC’s framework covers services including crypto-to-fiat and crypto-to-crypto exchange, virtual asset transfers, custody and certain services connected with token offerings.

Under the regulator’s guidance, businesses handling covered transfers must collect, verify and transmit specified information about the parties involved in a transaction.

For transfers involving self-hosted wallets, AUSTRAC requires the sending institution to determine whether the receiving wallet is custodial or self-hosted. While information does not have to be passed to another institution when no other regulated intermediary exists, the business must still collect and verify payer information and obtain relevant payee and tracing information.

The requirements apply alongside Australia’s existing financial intelligence reporting system. AUSTRAC previously said it received more than 2 million threshold transaction reports and more than 450,000 suspicious matter reports during the preceding reporting period.

Cryptolink’s reporting practices had already drawn regulatory attention months before the latest suspension, with the October 2025 enforceable undertaking requiring the company to address deficiencies identified by AUSTRAC’s Cryptocurrency Taskforce.

The company paid the associated A$56,340 infringement notice, while its latest three-month VASP registration suspension took effect on Aug. 9.

Thailand is rolling out a targeted tax break for crypto investors: beginning January 1, 2025, capital gains tax on profits from crypto trades conducted through platforms licensed by the country’s Securities and Exchange Commission will be exempt for five years, through December 31, 2029.

The move is designed to strengthen Thailand’s position as a regional digital-asset hub, while drawing a clear line between regulated onshore platforms and trading activity that occurs outside licensing—where investors would remain subject to standard personal income tax rates of up to 38%.

Key takeaways

• Thailand will exempt qualifying crypto capital gains for trades executed via SEC-licensed platforms from Jan. 1, 2025 to Dec. 31, 2029.
• Unlicensed or overseas exchange activity is still taxed under standard personal tax rates up to 38%.
• The policy is intended to make Thai-regulated access more attractive for investors, aligning crypto treatment with that of traditional securities.
• Across Asia, regulators and courts are simultaneously pushing for stronger controls—ranging from anti-scam withdrawal safeguards to travel-rule style data sharing.

Thailand’s five-year capital gains exemption for regulated exchanges

Under the new framework, crypto investors in Thailand will not pay capital gains tax on sales made through platforms licensed by the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission. The exemption runs for five years, covering January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2029.

While the tax incentive is specifically tied to using licensed venues, the exemption also signals a broader regulatory posture: Thailand is effectively attempting to mirror capital gains treatment applied to traditional securities. That linkage matters because it changes how investors model after-tax returns when comparing Thai-regulated offerings with offshore alternatives.

However, the relief is not universal. Traders who use exchanges that are unlicensed in Thailand, or that operate overseas without meeting the local licensing requirements, are expected to continue facing the country’s regular personal tax rates, reported as as high as 38%.

Thailand’s approach also follows earlier steps. In early 2024, the country reportedly waived 7% value-added tax on crypto gains—suggesting a pattern of phased adjustments aimed at improving the competitiveness of licensed crypto activity.

Asia’s policy push: scams, travel rules, and enforceability

Thailand’s tax move lands in a wider regulatory environment across Asia where authorities are focusing not only on market structure, but also on operational safeguards and information-sharing.

In Japan, for example, the Financial Services Agency has asked exchanges to adopt withdrawal delays and additional controls to combat scams. The regulator and Japan’s National Police Agency also highlighted patterns where fraudulent proceeds are transferred to exchange accounts. The requested measures include restricting withdrawals for a set period after customers deposit fiat or purchase digital assets, requiring users to pre-register withdrawal addresses, and enforcing a waiting period before newly added addresses can be used.

Taiwan is moving in a similar compliance direction. The Financial Supervisory Commission is set to require crypto platforms to transmit customer information for domestic platform-to-platform transfers starting in October. The rules apply irrespective of transfer value, with extra data requirements for transfers above 30,000 New Taiwan dollars (about $930). For high-value transfers, additional details such as a sender’s date of birth and residential address (for individuals) or corporate identification and registered address are expected. Receiving platforms would also need to verify beneficiary information provided by the sending institution against their own records. Taiwan also plans to extend the framework to transfers between domestic and overseas VASPs by the end of 2027.

Enforcement and asset tracing: Bybit’s North Korea case

Regulatory safeguards are running alongside legal efforts to trace and recover stolen funds. In a US court case involving exchange Bybit, a federal judge reportedly supported Bybit’s bid to trace assets connected to the widely reported $1.5 billion North Korea-linked hack from February 2025.

According to newly revealed court records, Bybit filed the lawsuit under seal on June 18 against North Korea, its Reconnaissance General Bureau, the Lazarus Group, and 20 unidentified defendants. The court granted expedited discovery on June 19, giving Bybit a route to identify alleged intermediaries and pursue a portion of funds that remain traceable.

Bybit reportedly told the court that 90.2% of the stolen assets had become untraceable after moving through mixers, cross-chain bridges, and over-the-counter dealers. The remaining 9.8% was said to be traced to identifiable wallets, including 5.3% of the total—about $75.5 million—that had been frozen or recovered. Bybit is seeking return of the stolen assets and approximately $1.5 billion in damages.

For market participants, the practical significance is straightforward: even when large portions of theft are obfuscated, courts and discovery processes can still uncover pockets of traceability—often tied to wallet-level movements and intermediary behavior—creating leverage for claims that go beyond a single judgment against a sanctioned state actor.

What builders and investors should watch next

Thailand’s capital gains exemption is likely to intensify the incentive to trade through SEC-licensed channels, while continuing to discourage the “regulatory arbitrage” route of using unlicensed or offshore exchanges. Investors should watch how Thailand defines eligibility in practice and whether licensed platforms promote the change in ways that meaningfully shift user behavior.

Harry Chun Tak Yeh, founder of Quantum Fintech Group and a longtime figure in the Fantom ecosystem, died after a reported fall from the Jade Park residential tower in Asunción, Paraguay, with authorities still investigating how it happened. 

Police were called to the building at about 4:30 a.m. on Aug. 7 and preliminarily identified the victim as Yeh.

The investigation remains open. Paraguayan police and prosecutors have not publicly classified the death as an accident, suicide or an act involving another person. The latest local reporting reviewed on Aug. 10 said forensic work and an autopsy were being used to establish the cause and circumstances.

Harry Yeh death probe centers on two apartments

Prosecutor María del Carmen Palazón joined Criminalistics and Homicide officers in examining an apartment on the 30th floor where Harry Yeh was believed to have stayed. Investigators found its doors open and the interior heavily disturbed, with nobody inside, according to a local report.

Police also examined another apartment on the 27th floor. Homicide chief Abel Cantero said evidence collected from both properties was transferred to the Public Prosecutor’s Office. Local reports said Yeh’s body was found without clothing, but authorities have not publicly explained whether that detail has any relevance to the cause of death.

Police have not established how the fall occurred

Asunción police director Francisco Ávalos said investigators were still at an early stage and could not determine how Yeh fell. Authorities were considering multiple possibilities rather than treating any single explanation as established. Prosecutors also sought authorization to search the apartment more thoroughly as they attempted to reconstruct Yeh’s movements before his death.

No official finding cited in the latest Paraguayan reporting has accused another person of involvement. Likewise, reports describing the apartment as disturbed do not by themselves establish robbery, assault or a crypto related crime. The body was transferred to Paraguay’s Judicial Morgue for an autopsy and forensic examination.

Yeh became closely tied to Fantom through Tomb Finance

Harry Yeh founded and managed Quantum Fintech Group, an investment business focused on cryptocurrency, blockchain and digital assets. His own profile says he also founded and seeded LIF3 and L3 Reserve and had been active across crypto investment and trading.

His connection to Fantom was particularly visible through Tomb Finance. A 2021 Fantom Foundation post said Tomb operated under Yeh’s oversight after he assumed direction of the project. His website separately describes an investment ecosystem focused primarily on Fantom based projects.

That ecosystem later changed substantially as Fantom evolved into Sonic. As previously reported inthe Fantom to Sonic transition, the FTM to S migration began in early 2025 at a 1:1 ratio. More recently,Sonic’s leadership restructuring saw several longtime figures step away from its board in June 2026.

$2 billion investment figure remains self reported

Harry Yeh’s biography says funds and assets managed by him, Quantum Fintech Group and partners “exceeded $2B USD.” An older profile reported that Yeh and his team said their network managed more than $2.4 billion. Neither source provides independently audited documentation supporting those figures, so they should be treated as claims rather than verified assets under management.

The next confirmed development is expected to come from Paraguay’s forensic and prosecutorial process. As of Aug. 10, the latest authoritative local reporting still described the autopsy and evidence review as pending and did not establish what caused Yeh to fall. Any claim that the death resulted from murder, suicide, robbery or a crypto related attack therefore remains unconfirmed.

H100 Group completed its previously announced acquisition of NSD AS on Aug. 10, adding 2,455.37 Bitcoin and lifting its total treasury to 3,506.4 BTC. 

The Stockholm listed company paid no cash for the transaction, instead issuing shares to the sellers under a Bitcoin for Bitcoin valuation structure, according to its official release.

The acquired Bitcoin was valued using a July 31 reference price of SEK 598,926.69, or about $62,900 per BTC. At Bitcoin’s current price near $65,158, H100’s enlarged treasury is worth roughly $228.5 million.

H100 nearly triples its Bitcoin holdings

The transaction follows a binding share purchase agreement signed on April 23 after the group first outlined the deal in March. NSD, formerly WR Start Up 594 AS, was reorganized so that it directly and indirectly owns Moonshot AS and PDI AS. H100 said the acquired company has no outstanding financial debt.

As crypto.news reported in the planned Norwegian acquisition, the original proposal was expected to raise H100’s treasury from about 1,051 BTC to roughly 3,501 BTC. The completed transaction ultimately added 2,455.37 BTC, taking the total slightly higher to 3,506.4 BTC.

Importantly, the roughly $62,900 figure was an agreed valuation reference, not the price of an open market Bitcoin purchase. The group used the Coinbase BTC/SEK spot rate at 23:59 CEST on July 31 to determine the consideration share price. The release does not provide a new official average purchase price for the combined treasury, so describing all 2,455.37 BTC as Bitcoin bought at $62,900 would be imprecise.

The group called the transaction the largest M&A deal in Europe’s public Bitcoin equity sector and “the first in the world done Bitcoin for Bitcoin.” Those descriptions are company claims and have not been independently established across every public market transaction.

In addition, H100 issued 790,534,666 new shares to the sellers at SEK 1.86 each. The consideration totaled about SEK 1.47 billion and was settled through seller promissory notes offset against the newly issued shares. As a result, the group made no cash payment to complete the acquisition.

The new shares create about 70% dilution based on the company’s share count when the deal closed. Even so, H100 said sats per basic share remained unchanged because the consideration was based on each side’s relative Bitcoin contribution. Fully diluted sats per share increased about 5%, from 288 to 303, according to company disclosures.

Deal adds Moonshot and PDI capabilities

The acquisition also brings Moonshot and PDI into H100’s corporate structure. The group said PDI follows an active Bitcoin management strategy focused on capital preservation, downside risk management and additional cash flow while retaining Bitcoin exposure. Those objectives describe the company’s strategy rather than guaranteed financial outcomes.

Executive Chairman Sander Andersen said the combination adds technology and market capabilities that complement H100’s existing operations. Principal seller Geir Harald Hansen also entered a 12 month lockup covering the consideration shares he received, subject to specified exceptions.

What happens next for H100

The newly issued shares are expected to begin trading on NGM Nordic SME as soon as practicable. The group completed the transaction using authority approved by shareholders at the June 23 annual general meeting, which allowed its board to issue consideration shares to the sellers under the April purchase agreement.

The deal represents a rapid expansion from the group’s first Bitcoin purchase in May 2025, when it acquired just 4.39 BTC. As previously reported in coverage of its first treasury purchase, the company subsequently raised capital and accelerated its Bitcoin accumulation strategy.

Moreover, the group also broadened its investor access through its Frankfurt market expansion in July 2025. After nearly tripling its Bitcoin holdings in the latest transaction, the immediate corporate milestone is the admission of the 790.5 million new shares to NGM Nordic SME.

Bitcoin hovered near $65,000 on Aug. 10 as veteran trader Peter Brandt leaned toward another decline, pointing to a large head and shoulders structure that broke down earlier this summer. 

Brandt said he had not entered a trade, but wrote that “if I were to bet it would be for a decline.”

The cautious view comes as the crypto tries to stabilize above its 54 day moving average while U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs attract more than $850 million in weekly inflows. That leaves the market caught between improving institutional demand and a technical structure that has not yet cleared resistance around $67,260.

Bitcoin indicators show a weak trend below $67,260

On the supplied BTC/USD daily chart, BTC was trading near $65,021 and remained slightly above its 54 day simple moving average near $64,352. Holding above that average points to stabilization following the June selloff, but price is still below the marked $67,260 resistance area.

The lower indicators reinforce the lack of a strong directional move. Average True Range stood near 1,672, showing that daily price ranges remain relatively wide, while the Average Directional Index was only about 11.16. An ADX reading this low indicates weak trend strength, which fits Bitcoin’s sideways movement after its drop toward the $58,000 to $60,000 area.

Brandt’s chart shows a head and shoulders structure built between April and June. The neckline around $75,000 has already broken, and his drawn path points toward roughly $58,000. That is a technical scenario rather than a confirmed destination. A sustained move above $67,260 would weaken the immediate bearish setup shown on his chart.

Brandt leans bearish as one large whale keeps selling

Brandt made the uncertainty clear in his Aug. 10 post. “I am not in the bet yet, but if I were to bet it would be for a decline,” he wrote. His wording matters because he is expressing a directional preference rather than announcing an active short position or guaranteeing another selloff.

Selling by at least one large holder adds another source of supply. Lookonchain reported that a whale sold another 1,019 BTC, worth about $66.4 million, and had disposed of 7,513 BTC worth roughly $486.9 million over three weeks. The activity is notable, but one tracked whale should not be treated as proof that Bitcoin whales as a group are selling.

THAILAND

Thailand introduces 0% capital gains tax on crypto

For the next few years crypto investors in Thailand won’t have to pay any capital gains taxes on sales made via platforms licensed by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission. The exemption is for five years and covers the period of January 1 2025, through to December 31 2029.

The scheme aims to boost Thailand’s attractiveness as a regional crypto hub, and it’s already home to a growing community of crypto digital nomads

However trades on unlicensed or overseas exchanges will still face standard personal tax rates as high as 38%. The exemption aligns the tax treatment of crypto with capital gains from traditional securities in the country.

Thailand previously waved 7% value added tax on crypto gains in early 2024.

CHINA

Bitcoin Red Team founder turns to Chinese AI

Bitcoin Red Team founder Rob Hamilton has been forced to rely on open-source Chinese AI models after finding himself restricted from analyzing codebases by OpenAI, highlighting a growing concern that the most capable AI tools aren’t being made available to defenders. 

“It absolutely guts me as a patriotic American to have to do this, but I will be going back to using Chinese open source models to conduct my research to protect Bitcoin infrastructure,” he said. 

“Black hats will not hit these issues. The white hats will. We’ve hit a local minima in policy,” said Hamilton. “Intelligence is unrestricted for those who don’t follow rules, and those who engage in harm reduction are left on the sidelines.”

The Bitcoin Policy Institute and an alliance of blockchain firms subsequently issued a call to “frontier AI labs to establish a clear, trusted pathway for qualified open-source and digital asset defenders to access their strongest capabilities.” 

Source: Rob Hamilton

CHINA NEWS IN BRIEF

— A man in Shenzen was convicted of attempted extortion after he stole confidential R&D data from his company and then posed as an overseas hacker to demand a ransom paid in Bitcoin.

ASIA PACIFIC

APAC region sees big jump in onchain transactions year-on-year

A new report from Hashed Open Research and SCBX found that on-chain transaction volume across the Asia-Pacific region grew by 68% year-on-year, from $1.4 trillion to $2.36 trillion. It was the fastest growth of any region globally, driven mainly by countries in South East Asia.

The report found that consumers in the region had skipped straight from cash, over cards and bank transactions, and went directly to mobile payments. Digital payments now account for 60% of all payments in the region.

CLARITY Act delay gives Asian financial hubs an opening: First Digital CEO

The US Senate’s delay of a vote on crypto market structure legislation to mid-September could give Hong Kong and Singapore more time to strengthen their positions as digital asset hubs, according to First Digital founder and CEO Vincent Chok.

Chok, whose company issues the FDUSD stablecoin, said the delay could give jurisdictions with clearer regulatory frameworks an advantage in attracting capital and talent as US uncertainty weighs on institutional adoption. 

“For Asia, this delay gives regional financial hubs like Hong Kong and Singapore additional time to demonstrate that clear regulation can coexist with innovation.” 

NORTH KOREA

US court backs Bybit’s bid to trace funds from $1.5B North Korea hack

A US federal judge backed crypto exchange Bybit’s effort to trace assets stolen in the infamous $1.5 billion North Korea-linked hack in February 2025. 

According to newly revealed records, Bybit filed the lawsuit under seal on June 18 against North Korea, its Reconnaissance General Bureau, the Lazarus Group and 20 unidentified defendants. The court granted Bybit’s request for expedited discovery on June 19.

The discovery authority gives Bybit a practical route to identify alleged intermediaries and pursue a small portion of stolen assets that remains traceable, rather than relying solely on a judgment against North Korea. 

Unfortunately, Bybit told the court that 90.2% of the stolen assets had become untraceable after passing through mixers, cross-chain bridges and over-the-counter dealers. The remaining 9.8% had been traced to identifiable wallets, including 5.3% of the total, about $75.5 million, that had been frozen or recovered.

Bybit is seeking the return of the stolen assets and approximately $1.5 billion in damages.

SOUTH KOREA NEWS IN BRIEF

— Dunamu, which operates Upbit, has been selected by the National Police Agency to custody seized crypto assets for the next year after it obtained the highest technical evaluation score of 94.14 points.

JAPAN

Japan FSA asks crypto exchanges to impose withdrawal delays to fight scams

Japan’s financial regulator has asked crypto exchanges to introduce withdrawal delays and other safeguards as authorities respond to increasingly sophisticated scams involving digital assets. 

The Financial Services Agency (FSA) said it had jointly requested the measures with the National Police Agency amid growing losses among crypto exchange users and cases where funds obtained through fraudulent schemes are being transferred to exchange accounts.

The request calls on exchanges to restrict crypto withdrawals for a specified period after customers deposit fiat currency or purchase digital assets. Platforms were also asked to require users to pre-register crypto withdrawal addresses and impose a waiting period before newly added addresses can be used.

JAPAN NEWS IN BRIEF

— Tokyo Stock Exchange plans to introduce a re‑examination regime for companies that undergo a major business pivot. The TSE didn’t name digital asset treasuries but logic suggests they may well fall within the scope of the new rules.

TAIWAN

Taiwan plans Travel Rule for domestic crypto transfers from October

Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission will require crypto platforms to transmit customer information on all domestic platform-to-platform transfers starting in October. 

The rules would apply regardless of value, but transfers exceeding 30,000 New Taiwan dollars (about $930) would trigger additional data requirements, including an individual sender’s date of birth and residential address, or a corporate sender’s official identification number and registered address.

Receiving VASPs would also be required to compare beneficiary information supplied by the originating platform with their own records. 

The FSC plans to extend the framework to transfers between domestic and overseas VASPs by the end of 2027.

SINGAPORE

Bitdeer increased Bitcoin mining output by nearly fivefold in Q2

Singapore headquartered Bitcoin miner Bitdeer mined 2,694 Bitcoin during the second quarter of 2026, up nearly fivefold from 565 BTC a year earlier. 

The miner closed the quarter with 150 BTC held on its balance sheet, down 90% from 1,502 BTC a year earlier, according to the company’s Q2 report published Monday.

Bitdeer liquidated its entire 943 BTC treasury in February, citing liquidity decisions rather than a shift away from its core Bitcoin mining business. 

SINGAPORE NEWS IN BRIEF

—UBS is sharpening its focus on wealthy Singapore residents. Over the past 25 years the number of Singapore residents who have between $5 million to $10 million compounded at an annual growth rate of 8 percent. In total there are 27,000 residents with between $5 million and $100 million.

HONG KONG

Binance sues RedotPay over alleged $473 million user losses: Report

Binance-affiliated companies have sued the founders of Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency payments company RedotPay, alleging it diverted more than 470,000 users from Binance Card in breach of their commercial agreement.

The plaintiffs seek nearly $473 million in damages, alleging the conduct contributed to RedotPay’s valuation as the company considers a potential initial public offering.

RedotPay said it is defending the proceedings and rejected what it described as “unfounded allegations” against the company and its co-founders. “RedotPay is strenuously defending the proceedings,” a RedotPay spokesperson told Cointelegraph, adding that it will respond through the appropriate legal process.

HONG KONG NEWS IN BRIEF

— Hong Kong police have arrested a 67-year-old woman accused of posing as a prospective tenant to scam property owners out of $510,000. She offered to pay rent in advance, then gave them a mobile phone with a genuine crypto app on it. However, the app had malware giving control over the wallet to the scammers, allowing them to steal funds once it had been funded.

VIETNAM NEWS IN BRIEF

— The Vietnam RWA Summit heard about how the country is developing groundwork for tokenizing RWAs from the securities regulator and Vietnam Blockchain Association.

— Vietnam’s central bank governor presented a draft law to the National Assembly to make crypto asset services reporting entities under the country’s anti money laundering regulations. It also highlights suspicious transaction indicators specifically tailored to crypto asset activities.

Ethereum price consolidated near $1,917 on Aug. 10 as buyers defended the $1,900 area, but weakening short-term momentum and dense liquidity near $1,950 kept ETH inside a narrow range.

Ethereum price holds above $1,900

According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) price was trading at approximately $1,917 at the time of writing, after moving between $1,906 and $1,931 during the latest daily session.

ETH has consolidated above $1,900 since recovering from lows near $1,800 earlier in August. The move followed renewed spot demand, short liquidations and a broader risk-asset rally after weak U.S. employment data reduced expectations for another near-term Federal Reserve rate hike.

U.S. nonfarm payrolls fell by 23,000 in July, missing forecasts for an increase of around 80,000. May and June payroll figures were also revised lower by a combined 103,000.

The softer report pushed Treasury yields lower and helped the S&P 500 close at a record on Aug. 7. Ethereum benefited from the same change in risk appetite, although the weekend advance has since lost momentum.

Washington also provided a secondary sentiment boost. Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed a motion that prepares the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act for a procedural vote after the August recess. However, the filing did not represent final passage, and lawmakers still need to resolve disputes involving government ethics, stablecoin rewards and enforcement provisions.

ETH momentum weakens below $1,950

The daily chart shows Ethereum trading in the upper half of its Bollinger Bands. The middle band stands at $1,897, while the upper and lower boundaries sit at $1,953 and $1,841, respectively.

Holding above the $1,897 midpoint keeps the short-term structure tilted toward buyers. The upper band near $1,953 now forms the main technical barrier before $2,000.

The daily relative strength index stands at 56.47, slightly above its signal average of 54.47. This indicates moderate bullish momentum without placing ETH in overbought territory. However, the indicator has flattened after its latest rise, matching the sideways price action.

Shorter-term indicators show more caution. On the 4-hour chart, ETH is sitting almost directly on its 20-period simple moving average at $1,917.78. The 50- and 100-period averages are clustered at $1,894.24 and $1,894.80, creating a concentrated support area below the current price.

The 200-period average is lower at $1,870.72. ETH remains above all four averages, preserving the broader recovery structure despite the latest consolidation.

The 4-hour moving average convergence divergence indicator has weakened. Its MACD line stands at 6.17, below the signal line at 7.53, while the histogram has turned slightly negative at minus 1.36. That crossover suggests buyers are losing momentum, but it has not yet produced a confirmed trend reversal.

Liquidation clusters frame the next Ethereum move

CoinGlass’ 3-day liquidation heatmap shows ETH trading between two major leverage concentrations.

The nearest upside cluster extends from approximately $1,942 to $1,953. Liquidity is particularly dense around $1,950, making that area a possible price magnet if ETH clears its recent intraday highs near $1,930.

A move through $1,953 would also break the daily upper Bollinger Band. Bulls could then target $1,965, a resistance level identified during the previous recovery, followed by $2,000.

Crypto.news previously reported that ETH needed to defend $1,900, clear leverage around $1,925 and break $1,965 to strengthen the case for a move toward $2,000. Price has met the first two conditions temporarily, but the final breakout remains unconfirmed.

On the downside, the strongest nearby liquidation band sits around $1,895–$1,902. That cluster overlaps with the 4-hour 50- and 100-period moving averages and the daily Bollinger midpoint.

A sweep of this area could trigger leveraged long liquidations before buyers attempt another recovery. If $1,890 fails, ETH may retreat toward its 4-hour 200-period average at $1,871. The daily lower Bollinger Band at $1,841 provides the next major support.

Analysts split on the $2,000 breakout

Analyst Ted Pillows said Ethereum was “holding strongly above the $1,900 level” and identified $2,000 as the next upside target. His chart places intermediate resistance near $1,965, followed by $2,030 and $2,100 if momentum accelerates.

The bearish scenario begins if ETH loses the $1,900–$1,850 support region. Pillows’ chart points to deeper downside levels near $1,700 and $1,500 if the recovery structure breaks.