Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Senate Leaders Push for July Passage of CLARITY Act

Published

on

Senate Leaders Push for July Passage of CLARITY Act

The path of the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, a bill intended to establish comprehensive guidelines for cryptocurrency regulation, remains uncertain with the US Congress set to break for another state work period in a matter of weeks.

Since passage in the US House of Representatives in July 2025, the CLARITY Act has faced several hurdles advancing in Congress, from industry pushback on stablecoin rewards to lawmakers’ concerns about ethics. The bill passed the Senate Agriculture Committee in January and the Senate Banking Committee in May along party lines, setting it up for consideration in the full chamber.

However, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday cancelled the signing ceremony for the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, a housing bill that received bipartisan support in both chambers and contained a ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Trump said that he would not sign the bill until Republicans in Congress passed the SAVE America Act, legislation requiring voters to provide proof of US citizenship in person to register, adding in March that he would “not sign other bills” until it was passed.

The move by the president leaves the future of the CLARITY Act in doubt despite earlier statements signaling he supported the bill. If Trump vetoes the legislation, Congress could override him with a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers. According to the US Constitution, if a president doesn’t sign or veto a bill within 10 days while Congress is in session, the bill automatically becomes law.

Advertisement

Related: Galaxy cuts CLARITY Act odds to 50% as Senate floor time narrows

On Monday, Republican leaders in the Senate, including banking committee chair Tim Scott and majority leader John Thune, said that they were pushing for the chamber to pass CLARITY in July. Lawmakers are scheduled to be out of Washington, DC and on state work periods until July 13, giving them four weeks to address the bill before a monthlong state work period in August.

Source: Senator Tim Scott

“We’ve been negotiating on the CLARITY Act hardcore since last Labor Day, and it’s been an arduous process,” said Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of the bill’s proponents, in a Fox Business interview last week, adding:

“We’re still working a little bit on DeFi, we’re working [on] illicit finance, we’re working a little bit on ethics [..] We’re finally to the point where we’re going to put out the text over the July 4th, and give people one last really thorough look at the bill, and then we’re moving in July.” 

What happens if lawmakers face more delays on CLARITY?

Republicans hold a slim majority in the US Senate, where they will need some support from Democrats should they hold a vote on CLARITY next month. Many Democratic lawmakers have been pushing for ethics provisions in the bill, citing the Trump family’s ties to the crypto industry through the president’s memecoin and his sons’ involvement in the World Liberty Financial platform and a Bitcoin mining company.

Advertisement

Should Republicans not meet the 60-vote threshold in the Senate before August, many experts expect that lawmakers dealing with reelection campaigns could delay the passage of CLARITY, potentially pushing the legislation to the next session of Congress in 2027.

Magazine: AI is banking the unbanked in Africa… faster than crypto

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Amazon (AMZN) Stock Surges Nearly 5% on Record Prime Day Sales and Bullish Analyst Upgrades

Published

on

AMZN Stock Card

Key Highlights

  • Amazon shares climbed as high as 4.8% during Monday’s session following a record-breaking Prime Day that saw consumer spending reach $26.4 billion, marking a 9.3% increase compared to last year.
  • Wells Fargo initiated coverage with a buy recommendation and set a $312 price target, implying approximately 35% potential upside from the current trading range near $232.
  • Citizens JMP reaffirmed its Market Outperform stance with a $315 target, highlighting robust artificial intelligence infrastructure demand.
  • Amazon Web Services announced a 20% hourly GPU rate increase starting July 1, signaling strong cloud computing pricing authority.
  • Major enterprise clients are securing 3-to-5-year AWS capacity agreements, which Wall Street analysts view as a positive indicator for revenue stability and margin expansion.

Amazon (AMZN) shares surged by as much as 4.8% during Monday’s trading session, reaching an intraday peak of $246.76 after starting the day at $234.21. The significant upward movement followed a confluence of positive developments across both the company’s e-commerce and cloud computing divisions.


AMZN Stock Card
Amazon.com, Inc., AMZN

The company’s extended Prime Day promotional event concluded its four-day span with record-breaking consumer expenditure totaling $26.4 billion, representing a 9.3% year-over-year growth, based on data from Adobe Analytics. This year’s strategic calendar adjustment moved the shopping event from its traditional July slot to June, deliberately avoiding scheduling conflicts with major events including the FIFA World Cup and America’s 250th Independence Day celebrations.

This calendar realignment also capitalized on peak summer vacation spending patterns and early back-to-school purchasing behavior. Bank of America Securities analysts highlighted that this scheduling change is projected to drive a 5% boost in overall gross merchandise value.

Prior to this week’s rally, the stock had experienced significant downward pressure. AMZN declined more than 14% throughout June, retreating from its $270 peak to approximately $232. This substantial correction left market participants searching for support levels.

Wells Fargo stepped in to address that uncertainty. Ken Gawrelski, analyst at the firm, published a buy rating on Friday, June 26, establishing a $312 price objective. This target represents roughly 35% appreciation potential from present levels and translates to an $80-per-share gain for investors entering positions around $232.

Advertisement

Cloud Computing Pricing Strength Draws Wall Street Focus

Citizens JMP also released commentary Monday, maintaining its Market Outperform rating alongside a $315 valuation target. The research firm highlighted AWS’s forthcoming 20% increase in hourly GPU pricing, scheduled to begin July 1, as tangible evidence of sustained AI infrastructure demand and meaningful pricing power in the cloud services market.

AWS Chief Executive Matthew Garman discussed the company’s strong visibility into customer demand extending through the next three to six months. Major enterprise organizations are executing multi-year capacity commitments spanning three to five years, which Citizens JMP characterizes as risk-reducing factors that provide AWS with enhanced revenue predictability.

The investment firm maintains that artificial intelligence technology adoption remains in nascent stages and anticipates demand resilience even if current supply limitations prove temporary. Amazon’s top-line revenue expanded 14% over the trailing twelve-month period, while InvestingPro calculates a Fair Value estimate of $261 compared to the current market price of $233.

Favorable Market Conditions Supported the Rally

Broader market dynamics provided additional tailwinds for Amazon’s performance. The Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.2% Monday while the S&P 500 climbed 0.7%, indicating a return of risk appetite following a challenging previous week that saw significant technology sector selling pressure.

Advertisement

Mega-cap technology stocks experienced widespread gains, though Amazon benefited from company-specific catalysts beyond general market sentiment.

The convergence of exceptional Prime Day performance metrics, favorable analyst commentary from two prominent firms, and the AWS GPU pricing adjustment provided market participants with multiple distinct rationales for renewed buying interest. Market observers are now focused on the company’s upcoming quarterly financial release to determine whether these positive developments will materialize in improved earnings results.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strategy Authorizes up to $1.25B of Bitcoin Sales as Saylor Formalizes Capital Pivot

Published

on

Strategy Authorizes up to $1.25B of Bitcoin Sales as Saylor Formalizes Capital Pivot


Michael Saylor's Strategy said it can now sell Bitcoin to fund dividends, interest and stock buybacks, formalizing a capital pivot for the world's largest corporate holder of the cryptocurrency. The company, which holds 847,363 BTC, said in a press release and an 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities… Read the full story at The Defiant

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

OKX Courts Stranded Users as Bybit Starts EEA Trading Restrictions

Published

on

OKX Courts Stranded Users as Bybit Starts EEA Trading Restrictions

Bybit will progressively restrict crypto trading on its Global platform for users across the European Economic Area, becoming the second major exchange after Binance to pull back from Europe before the July 1 MiCA deadline.

The exchange said affected users will receive advance notice and keep access to their assets. Bybit EU, its separately licensed European entity, stays open, while rival OKX moves to capture traders leaving both Bybit and Binance.

Bybit Steps Back From Europe Before the MiCA Deadline

The MiCA transitional period ends on July 1, 2026. After that, only firms holding a Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) license can serve EEA residents. ESMA has ruled out any extension and issued a final warning to unlicensed firms.

In its notice, Bybit named 29 EEA countries where Global platform access will be limited in stages. Affected users will get timelines to manage positions and keep custody and withdrawal rights.

Advertisement

“We would like to inform you of certain operational and structural developments in the European Economic Area (EEA) in the context of our ongoing regulatory alignment efforts,” read an excerpt in the announcement.

Bybit EU, the group’s licensed arm in Vienna, stays open. It counts among just 14 fully licensed European exchanges on the ESMA register, though Malta sits outside its passport for now.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

OKX Courts Traders as Binance Exits the EU

Binance set the precedent days earlier. The world’s largest exchange withdrew its Greek MiCA application after reports that its regulator would balk at clearing co-founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ).

Advertisement

That scrutiny has history. Binance pleaded guilty in the United States in 2023 and paid more than $4.3 billion, while CZ admitted a money laundering charge and resigned as chief executive.

Binance will wind down EU services from July 1 and plans to reapply, reportedly in France.

OKX moved quickly to turn the disruption into an opportunity. It was among the first global exchanges to be licensed under MiCA, receiving Malta’s approval in January 2025, and holds a MiFID permission for derivatives.

That product matters here. Binance, OKX, and Bybit rank as the three largest derivatives venues by 2026 volume, yet Bybit EU currently offers only spot trading.

Advertisement

OKX Europe’s chief, Erald, urged Bybit and Binance users to switch, promoting an 8% deposit offer.

“Now we offer 8% on new deposits. Don’t wait to transfer your assets from Bybit Global and Binance to OKX,” said Erald.

Elsewhere, CEO Star Xu questioned whether Binance’s failure was really a loss for Europe, extending the longstanding public rivalry and aggression against Binance and its founder, CZ.

Xu’s appeal to the rule of law is pointed. OKX pleaded guilty in the United States in 2025 over more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, paying a $504 million settlement. Months after gaining its MiCA license, Malta fined its European unit €1.1 million.

Advertisement

Compliance Becomes Europe’s New Dividing Line

Other licensed venues are pressing the advantage. Coinbase opened a Luxembourg hub, joining the regulated platforms chasing displaced traders.

The shake-out rewards firms that prepared early. Marcos Viriato, CEO and co-founder of Parfin, said a permit alone settles little.

“A license doesn’t create adoption. It creates the conditions for adoption… Compliance has become a competitive advantage,” Viriato told BeInCrypto in an email.

Whether consolidation around fewer licensed venues helps or hurts European users should become clearer in the months after the deadline.

The post OKX Courts Stranded Users as Bybit Starts EEA Trading Restrictions appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Singapore’s Hyperliquid Warning, Indonesia’s FinFluencer Licence: Asia Express

Published

on

Singapore's Hyperliquid Warning, Indonesia's FinFluencer Licence: Asia Express

Hyperliquid added to Singapore’s Investor Alert List

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and financial regulator, has added decentralized perpetuals exchange Hyperliquid to its Investor Alert List.

The entry, added on Friday, includes the Hyper Foundation website and the Hyperliquid trading app.

The Investor Alert List is a consumer protection measure that identifies entities that may be wrongly perceived as licensed or regulated by MAS. Inclusion on the list does not constitute a ban or enforcement action.

MAS added crypto exchange Bybit to the list on June 17 and KuCoin and Bitget also appear.

Advertisement

Hyperliquid said that it has never claimed to be licensed or authorized by MAS and that nothing about its permissionless infrastructure has changed.

Indonesia sets certification rules for influencers recommending crypto

Indonesia’s financial regulator has introduced certification requirements for influencers who recommend crypto and other digital financial assets, as the country expands oversight of financial promotions on social media.

Under Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 6 of 2026, announced Wednesday, individuals recommending digital assets must obtain competency certifications unless they are already subject to a separate licensing requirement.

Influencers may recommend only digital assets listed on authorized exchanges, while any service provider they recommend must also be licensed. Marketing campaigns must be conducted through regulated financial services businesses, which are responsible for the promotional content, and distributed through their official communication channels.

Advertisement

Indonesia joins a growing number of jurisdictions tightening oversight of financial influencers, also called finfluencers, with Australia and the United Kingdom introducing broader rules for investment promotions and the Philippines adopting crypto-specific marketing restrictions.

South Korean authorities fine Bithumb $136K over sharing user information overseas

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb was order to pay a $136,000 fine after it was found to have breached personal information protections rules when it sent user data overseas.

In a Thursday notice, the country’s Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) said that its investigation into Bithumb found that the exchange had “transferred personal information overseas without the separate consent of the data subjects during the process of order book sharing and virtual asset transfer with overseas virtual asset exchanges.”

The incident was connected to Bithumb sharing its Tether (USDT) order books between September and November 2025 with BingX, despite obtaining consent to share the data with Stellar, as well as sharing user information with 13 overseas exchanges.

Advertisement

SBI to acquire Bitbank in $289M deal creating Japan’s biggest crypto exchange

Japan’s SBI Holdings has signed agreements to acquire full control of crypto exchange Bitbank through a 46.7 billion Japanese yen ($289 million) transaction, advancing a deal first disclosed in May that would create the country’s biggest crypto exchange.

SBI expects the transaction to close around October, subject to regulatory clearance.

The acquisition would expand SBI’s regulated crypto exchange footprint and customer base, giving it another potential distribution channel for the stablecoins, tokenized assets and onchain financial products.

Bitbank’s daily trading volume has hovered below $50 million for most of the last four months, CoinGecko data showed. Volume is dominated by the BTC/JPY pair (39.5%), followed by XRP/JPY and ETH/JPY (both at 19.7%).

Advertisement

SBI said combining Bitbank with SBI VC Trade would give the group about 1.1 trillion yen in assets under custody and roughly 2.92 million crypto accounts, meaning the combined business would rank first among Japanese crypto exchanges.

Chainlink joins European and Korean bank consortia to develop FX settlement network

Chainlink has joined a working group with European and South Korean banking organizations to explore the use of stablecoins for foreign exchange (FX) settlement.

The protocol has announced Project Pangea alongside South Korean digital asset infrastructure company FairSquareLab, the Unified Korea Alliance (UniKA) — a consortium that includes more than a dozen Korean commercial banks — and Qivalis, a euro stablecoin consortium backed by 37 European banks.

Project Pangea aims to bring together financial institutions across Europe and South Korea to evaluate direct, atomic swaps of euro- and South Korean won-denominated stablecoins using Chainlink’s data infrastructure alongside FairSquareLab’s onchain foreign exchange settlement technology.

Advertisement

The initiative is another example of financial institutions evaluating stablecoins for wholesale financial infrastructure rather than consumer payments. According to the Bank for International Settlements, the global foreign exchange market processes roughly $9.6 trillion in daily trading volume.

South Korea adds token securities to capital market overhaul

South Korea’s financial regulator folded token securities infrastructure into a broader overhaul of the country’s capital markets, alongside plans for faster settlement, longer trading hours and greater use of artificial intelligence.

On Tuesday, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) said it had launched a capital market infrastructure review meeting to coordinate reforms across government agencies and market operators. According to the FSC, plans for token securities will be further discussed separately through a public-private council before being linked to the wider initiative. 

The initiative includes a roadmap for shortening the securities settlement cycle, expected by October, and a Korea Securities Depository (KSD) system for settling over-the-counter trades in unlisted shares and fractional investment products by the end of 2026. 

Advertisement

Circle, Nomura eye Japan corporate FX with stablecoin settlement: Report

Stablecoin issuer Circle and Japan’s largest investment bank Nomura have reportedly partnered to enable instant foreign exchange settlement for Japanese companies as early as 2027.

The service would enable companies to convert yen into dollar-denominated stablecoins for cross-border transactions and instant settlement, reducing delays caused by banking hours and time zone differences, Nikkei reported on Thursday.

The partnership would bring one of the world’s largest dollar stablecoins into Japan’s corporate foreign exchange market, expanding the use of stablecoins for business-to-business cross-border settlement.

Australian regulator extends no-action period for crypto licensing

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has given digital asset businesses another three months (to September 30) apply for licenses required under its updated regulatory guidance.

Advertisement

The extension applies to businesses seeking an Australian Financial Services (AFS) license, as well as companies that may require market or clearing and settlement authorizations.

The regulator said it has received about 30 license applications since updating its digital asset guidance in October 2025 to clarify that many crypto products are financial products under the law and require an AFSL.

It noted its recent court victory against BlockEarner emphasized that point.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tom Lee pushes Bitmine closer to owning 5% of Ethereum supply

Published

on

Ethereum daily chart showing a potential descending triangle, with price holding above $1,510 support while facing resistance near $1,700 and $1,860.

Bitmine has increased its Ethereum holdings to more than 5.7 million ETH, bringing the company within reach of its stated goal of controlling 5% of the cryptocurrency’s circulating supply.

Summary

  • Bitmine added 27,084 ETH last week, increasing its treasury to more than 5.7 million ETH, or about 4.7% of Ethereum’s supply.
  • Chairman Tom Lee said the company remains on track to reach its goal of controlling 5% of Ethereum’s circulating supply in 2026.
  • Ethereum continues to hold above key support near $1,510, while Bitmine and other treasury firms keep accumulating despite recent market weakness.

According to a June 29 company announcement, the Ethereum treasury firm purchased another 27,084 ETH over the past week, lifting its total holdings to just over 5.7 million ETH.

Based on Bitmine’s figures, the treasury now represents about 4.7% of Ethereum’s estimated circulating supply of 120.7 million ETH, while Chairman Tom Lee reiterated his expectation that the company could reach the “alchemy of 5%” sometime in 2026.

Advertisement

Bitmine expands Ethereum treasury through steady buying

The latest purchase continues Bitmine’s accumulation strategy despite a difficult week for the crypto market. Ethereum fell around 8% during the period, yet the company maintained its buying pace while keeping most of its holdings in staking.

Per the announcement, Bitmine has staked nearly 4.9 million ETH, or about 85% of its treasury, with those holdings valued at roughly $7.7 billion at current market prices.

Tom Lee said the company projects annualized staking revenue of about $211 million, while its staking operations have recently generated an annualized seven-day yield of 2.75%.

Advertisement

Bitmine’s scale has made it the largest publicly traded Ethereum treasury company. Its Arkham wallet page has become a closely watched reference for investors tracking the firm’s purchases and staking activity, drawing attention to both the rapid expansion of its treasury and its exposure to Ethereum price swings.

Earlier this month, crypto.news examined what could happen if treasury companies continue accumulating large portions of Ethereum’s supply. The report noted that while sustained buying can reduce liquid supply available on the market, concentrated ownership may also increase risks if companies later finance operations through debt, equity issuance, or asset sales during weaker market conditions.

Institutional positioning continues despite weak price action

Separately, Bitmine said it has joined the Russell 1000 index following the annual reconstitution of the benchmark. Tom Lee stated that the inclusion could introduce hundreds or even thousands of additional institutional investors to the company’s shareholder base.

Although Ethereum has struggled in recent weeks, Lee pointed to several industry developments that he believes remain supportive. He cited the launch of Ethlabs and the Bank of England’s softer position on stablecoins as positive developments for the Ethereum ecosystem.

Advertisement

Commenting on the recent weakness across crypto markets, Lee said the selling pressure was consistent with quarter-end portfolio repositioning rather than a change in Ethereum’s long-term outlook.

“We are nearing quarter-end for June, and it is not surprising to see ‘window dressing’ leading to investors reducing their holdings in assets which have fallen in the past 3 months.”

The latest treasury purchase also comes as other publicly traded Ethereum holders continue adding to their positions. According to blockchain data highlighted by crypto analyst Rain, SharpLink acquired 39,196 ETH worth about $62.4 million over three days, even as spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds recorded a seventh straight week of net outflows.

Rain argued that the buying suggests some corporate treasury managers are positioning for long-term institutional adoption rather than responding to short-term market momentum.

Bitmine’s Ethereum strategy has also become increasingly linked to its public-market structure. In an earlier report, crypto.news noted that the company’s BMNP preferred-share dividend plan ties shareholder payments to the size of its Ethereum treasury and the income generated from staking, making staking returns a core part of the firm’s capital strategy rather than simply an additional revenue source.

Advertisement

Ethereum remains pinned near major support

From a technical perspective, Ethereum appears to be forming a descending triangle on the daily chart, with a series of lower highs pressing against horizontal support near $1,510. The pattern suggests sellers continue to gain control while buyers defend the same price zone.

Ethereum daily chart showing a potential descending triangle, with price holding above $1,510 support while facing resistance near $1,700 and $1,860.
Ethereum daily price chart — June 29 | Source: crypto.news

Momentum indicators remain cautious. The daily RSI is holding near 31, close to oversold territory, suggesting selling pressure has eased but buyers have yet to regain control. Meanwhile, the MACD remains below the zero line despite flattening out, indicating bearish momentum is weakening without confirming a reversal.

A breakout above the descending trendline and the $1,700 resistance could invalidate the bearish setup and open the way toward the $1,860 Fibonacci resistance. Conversely, a decisive break below the $1,510 support would confirm the descending triangle and could accelerate losses toward the psychological $1,400 level.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Is $54K Inevitable for BTC if $60K Support Is Decisively Lost?

Published

on

After yielding to heavy selling pressure and losing several key support levels over the past few weeks, Bitcoin is now holding at a key support level. The broader market structure continues to favor the sellers, but the market’s reaction to the $60k critical demand zone could determine the next major move.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The Daily Chart

On the daily timeframe, BTC is trading below $60K after extending its decline from the rejection near the $82K region. The breakdown below the $74K resistance area, which also aligns with the 100-day moving average, confirmed a bearish shift in market structure and accelerated the latest leg lower.

The asset is currently testing a major support zone around $60K, where buyers have managed to slow the decline. This area also served as an important demand region earlier in the year and helped prevent the massive February crash, making it a key level to watch. As long as Bitcoin holds above this range, the market could attempt a relief rally.

However, the broader trend remains bearish. The 100-day and 200-day moving averages are both sloping downward, with the 200-day MA positioned around the $75k area and continuing to act as the ultimate dynamic resistance. Meanwhile, the $67K zone represents the first significant resistance on any recovery attempt, followed by the stronger $74K supply region.

Advertisement

To the downside, a decisive daily close below the $60K support would likely expose the next major demand area around $54K and potentially extend the current corrective phase.

BTC/USDT 4-Hour Chart

The 4-hour chart highlights a well-defined descending trendline that has consistently capped every recovery attempt since late May. The price recently tested this trendline again but failed to break above it, reinforcing bearish control over the short-term structure.

BTC is now consolidating just above the horizontal support around $60K, forming a relatively tight trading range after the latest rejection. The RSI has also recovered from oversold conditions and is hovering near the midline, suggesting that downside momentum has cooled, although there is still no convincing bullish momentum shift.

The first hurdle for buyers remains the descending trendline, which is currently located just below the $61K to $62K resistance zone. A successful breakout above both levels could trigger a short-term recovery toward the $67K supply area.

Advertisement

On the other hand, losing the $60K support with a bearish candle closing below it would invalidate the current consolidation and likely accelerate selling toward the next daily demand zone near $54K.

On-Chain Analysis

The Exchange Whale Ratio, which measures the proportion of the top exchange inflows relative to total inflows, has been trending lower alongside Bitcoin’s recent decline. Lower readings generally indicate that large holders are contributing a smaller share of exchange deposits, suggesting that aggressive whale selling has eased compared to previous periods.

While this moderation in whale activity may reduce immediate sell-side pressure, it does not yet signal a confirmed bullish reversal. Bitcoin continues to trade at a major technical support while the broader market structure remains bearish, indicating that buyers still need to reclaim key resistance levels before a sustained recovery becomes more likely.

For now, the combination of stabilizing whale inflows and price holding above the $60K support zone offers the first signs that selling pressure may be cooling. Nevertheless, confirmation will require Bitcoin to break above the descending trendline on the 4-hour timeframe and reclaim the $67K area before sentiment can begin shifting in favor of the bulls.

Advertisement

The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: Is $54K Inevitable for BTC if $60K Support Is Decisively Lost? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump Faces 10-Day Deadline on Housing Bill Including CBDC Ban

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

President Donald Trump has a narrow window of roughly 10 days to decide whether to sign, ignore, or veto a bipartisan housing bill that includes a provision restricting the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and other “substantially similar” digital assets through the end of 2030.

House Speaker Mike Johnson sent the “21st Century ROAD to Housing Act” to Trump’s desk on Monday, according to reporting from CNN. Under the U.S. Constitution, the president’s options hinge on a constitutional review period that begins with the bill’s delivery and runs for about 10 days excluding Sundays.

Key takeaways

  • The housing bill includes a CBDC ban: the Federal Reserve is barred from issuing or creating a CBDC or “substantially similar” digital assets until the end of 2030.
  • Trump has about 10 days to decide whether to sign, veto, or otherwise act on the bill after it reached his desk.
  • Trump reportedly dismissed the measure as a “yawn” and cancelled a planned signing ceremony, urging focus on a different voting-related bill.
  • The bill passed with bipartisan support, including participation tied to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who backed the CBDC restriction as part of broader legislative bargaining.
  • If Trump vetoes the bill, Congress could attempt to override with a two-thirds majority in both chambers.

How the CBDC restriction got attached to a housing package

The CBDC language is embedded in the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, a bill that the House passed last week with support from both Democrats and Republicans. The key policy provision bars the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a CBDC “or any digital asset that is substantially similar” until the end of 2030.

Reports indicate that this restriction was included as part of an effort to attract Republican backing. The bill is described as being sponsored by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, suggesting the CBDC clause was used to broaden coalition-building around a major domestic policy goal: housing.

As a result, the question for crypto-focused observers is not only whether the CBDC prohibition survives, but whether lawmakers are willing to keep treating CBDC policy as bargaining material inside unrelated bills—potentially creating unpredictable outcomes for future digital-asset regulation.

Advertisement

Trump’s reported response and the politics around “SAVE America”

Trump’s public posture toward the housing bill appears dismissive and politically conditional. According to reports cited by Cointelegraph, Trump called the legislation a “yawn” and referred to the situation sarcastically as a “big deal.” He also cancelled a signing ceremony scheduled for Wednesday, telling Republicans in Congress, in effect, to focus on passing the SAVE America Act instead.

At the center of the broader legislative fight is a voting measure Trump has emphasized previously. The housing bill’s political linkage matters because it underscores how the White House may prioritize one agenda item over another—even when the other item contains a direct restriction on a CBDC.

The Reuters/CNN-style summary in the source material also notes the housing bill would require voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship in person to register. That provision could affect electoral participation in ways that add friction for lawmakers who support housing policy but remain split on voting requirements.

What happens next if Trump vetoes

With the bill now in Trump’s hands, the next 10 days are likely to determine whether the CBDC restriction becomes law. If the president vetoes it, Congress could override that veto with a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate, a high bar but one that remains a constitutional pathway.

Advertisement

The source material frames Trump’s decision in the context of his stated priorities for other legislation. Earlier, Trump said in March that he would “not sign other bills” until the SAVE America Act was passed. At the same time, he posted on social media indicating support for the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, according to Cointelegraph’s prior reporting—signaling that the White House’s position on digital assets may not be uniformly hostile, even if it chooses to de-prioritize the CBDC language embedded in the housing bill.

Senate calendar pressures: CLARITY timing vs. housing CBDC ban

While the president weighs the housing bill, the Senate is operating on a separate legislative track. The chamber broke on Friday for state work periods, with lawmakers expected to return by July 13, according to the source text. That schedule would leave roughly four weeks for lawmakers to address the CLARITY Act before the Senate shifts again for another state work period in August.

This timing matters because it creates two parallel timelines: one is the immediate presidential decision on the CBDC restriction; the other is the Senate’s near-term window to move forward on broader market-structure and digital asset policy via the CLARITY Act.

In other words, even if the CBDC ban in the housing bill becomes law or dies via veto, the regulatory direction for the sector may still depend heavily on whether the CLARITY Act advances on the Senate’s calendar.

Advertisement

For investors and builders, the practical takeaway is that “CBDC policy” and “market structure policy” may be converging in the legislative process but not necessarily in a coordinated way. The next signals to watch are whether Trump signs the housing bill before the constitutional deadline, whether Congress can rally for a veto override if he rejects it, and whether Senate leadership maintains momentum on the CLARITY Act during the July window.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Circle’s USDC Becomes First Stablecoin Supported by BNY Mellon for Institutional Clients

Published

on

The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY), the oldest bank in the United States, has expanded its partnership with Circle to introduce new stablecoin services for institutional clients.

Circle’s USDC will become the first stablecoin supported on BNY’s Digital Asset Custody platform under the arrangement. This will allow BNY clients to store, transfer, mint, and burn USDC through the bank’s custody services.

BNY Mellon integrates USDC

According to the official blog post, the latest move broadens BNY’s role as the primary custodian of USDC reserves. Institutional clients using BNY’s digital asset custody platform can now hold USDC in their custody wallets and use the bank to instruct Circle to convert US dollars into USDC.

Clients will also be able to redeem USDC for US dollars through the burning process. Circle said that these services are intended to support the entire lifecycle of institutional stablecoin activity by connecting traditional cash services with digital asset custody within one framework. BNY said the stablecoin capabilities are part of its integrated Digital Assets platform, which is designed to help institutional clients manage the growing connection between traditional finance and digital assets.

Advertisement

By combining custody and cash management services, the bank aims to provide access to blockchain-based networks while maintaining the controls, governance, and operational resilience required by institutional markets. BNY also plans to expand support to other stablecoin issuers and additional digital cash workflows over time.

BNY’s Chief Product and Innovation Officer Carolyn Weinberg commented,

“As digital assets become increasingly integrated into financial markets, institutions need infrastructure that seamlessly works across traditional and blockchain-based systems. With the addition of our enhanced stablecoin enablement capabilities, we’re expanding the ways clients can move value with the operational scale, trust, and resiliency they expect from BNY.”

BNY’s Crypto Footprint

BNY Mellon and Circle first partnered in March 2022, when the bank was selected as a primary custodian for the reserves backing the stablecoin. Since then, the bank has steadily strengthened its presence in digital assets over the past few years.

This year, the Wall Street giant expanded its digital asset custody business by partnering with Finstreet and ADI Foundation to develop regulated crypto infrastructure within Abu Dhabi’s ADGM financial hub.

Advertisement

The post Circle’s USDC Becomes First Stablecoin Supported by BNY Mellon for Institutional Clients appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Put-Call Ratio Climbs to 1-Year High as $55K Risk Rises

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin is struggling to regain the $61,000 level, and options markets are reflecting growing demand for downside protection. Traders are now openly debating whether $55,000 could become the next major support test as the market’s hedging behavior turns unusually aggressive.

At the same time, the broader backdrop for risk assets has improved—crude oil has fallen following a US–Iran 60-day ceasefire agreement—and capital appears to be rotating toward US tech, particularly semiconductors. For crypto investors, that divergence between traditional-market momentum and Bitcoin’s options-driven caution is becoming hard to ignore.

Key takeaways

  • Deribit data shows put-option premiums are overwhelmingly higher than call premiums, with Friday’s put-to-call imbalance at the highest level in more than 12 months.
  • A 19% 30-day delta skew suggests options market makers are not willing to carry downside exposure, implying persistent hedging demand over the past month.
  • Strategy’s (formerly MicroStrategy) latest capital actions reduce some near-term dividend and debt concerns, but do not remove market uncertainty around Bitcoin supply dynamics.
  • Outside crypto, Bloomberg-linked ETF flows point to heavy inflows into semiconductor funds, while US-listed Bitcoin spot ETFs have experienced seven consecutive weeks of net outflows.

Options traders lean into downside protection

Despite renewed optimism linked to lower crude oil prices after the US and Iran agreed to a 60-day ceasefire, Bitcoin has not been able to reclaim $61,000 since Thursday. The clearest sign of caution is visible in derivatives positioning.

On Deribit, the premium paid for Bitcoin put (sell) options totaled $115 million on Friday, compared with $16 million paid for call (buy) options. This put-call imbalance was reported as the most extreme in over 12 months, indicating unusually low appetite for bullish exposure.

However, the data does not automatically translate into coordinated bearish conviction. A surge in puts can also reflect risk management by investors who want protection without necessarily expecting an immediate collapse. Even so, the broader structure of the options curve reinforces the sense that hedging is in demand rather than speculative upside bets.

Advertisement

That structure is captured by the 30-day delta skew, which stood at 19% on Monday on Deribit. In practical terms, such a skew signals that market makers are unwilling to hold meaningful downside exposure. According to the analysis reflected in the article, this fear has effectively been “the norm” for roughly four weeks, lining up with Bitcoin’s difficulty holding above $60,000.

The market’s reaction matters because it can increase the cost of negative scenarios: more demand for protection typically means higher implied costs to insure positions. Traders watching the $55,000 level may therefore also watch whether the options skew starts to mean-revert—or whether demand for downside hedges continues to rise.

Strategy’s cash moves calm some fears—but don’t resolve supply questions

Another factor shaping sentiment is investor concern about Strategy’s ability to meet obligations. The company’s reaction provides some near-term comfort, even as it raises new questions for Bitcoin’s balance between potential selling and demand.

Earlier coverage noted discomfort around MicroStrategy (now Strategy) regarding dividends and debt maturities in 2027. On Monday, the company announced additional actions tied to liquidity: it disclosed an additional $1.2 billion in cash sourced from recent share sales, and it set aside $1.25 billion in Bitcoin for eventual sale.

Advertisement

From an investor’s perspective, the added cash helps address near-term funding anxiety. The reported logic also suggests bears may feel less pressure from forced issuance of MSTR shares—because, as the article states, the company does not have incentives to issue shares given its reported 17 months of dividend coverage.

Yet the same actions can introduce another layer of uncertainty: any reference to future Bitcoin sales keeps the market focused on supply/demand dynamics. Even if no sales occur in the “next couple of months,” the knowledge that a portion of holdings is earmarked for selling can continue to weigh on sentiment at the margin.

Capital rotation: semiconductors draw inflows while Bitcoin spot ETFs leak

While Bitcoin’s derivatives market shows caution, parts of traditional markets have leaned more constructive. The article points to easing inflationary pressure and the drop in crude oil to its lowest level in four months. It also highlights a Goldman Sachs report projecting 22% annual earnings growth for S&P 500 companies, which helped reduce worries about excessive valuations.

In that environment, retail investors appear to be reallocating toward semiconductors. The analysis cited by “The Kobeissi Letter,” using Bloomberg data, claims more than $20 billion in cumulative inflows into semiconductor exchange-traded funds (ETFs). That activity is said to have helped drive an 81% rally in the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and 60% gains in the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).

Advertisement

Against this backdrop, Bitcoin is also facing persistent resistance from spot ETF flows. The article notes seven consecutive weeks of net outflows from US-listed Bitcoin spot ETFs, a pattern that has “shattered” hopes for a strong rebound from the reported $58,050 lows on June 25.

Even if some selling pressure is ultimately explained by sector rotation rather than a direct deterioration in Bitcoin fundamentals, the implication for near-term price action is straightforward: sentiment is unlikely to improve while flows remain consistently negative. Traders expecting a bounce may therefore need to see not only macro stabilization but also signs that ETF outflows are easing.

What to watch next as hedging and flows diverge

A retest of $55,000 should not be dismissed given the options market’s demand for downside protection. Still, the same skew that signals fear can also reflect investors hedging rather than betting against Bitcoin’s long-term prospects. The key variables moving forward are whether the options put-call imbalance and 30-day delta skew start to normalize—and whether US spot Bitcoin ETF flows begin to recover from their seven-week streak of net outflows.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

What the DTCC deal means

Published

on

Stellar price chart.

Stellar trades near $0.18, but a May 2026 plan for the DTCC to connect its tokenization service to Stellar, with XLM named as the settlement token, could route trillions in traditional securities onto the network. What would that actually mean for the price? Here is the realistic read, separating the landmark from the hype.

Summary

  • Stellar trades near $0.18 as of late June 2026, down from a July 2025 high near $0.52, with the Fear and Greed reading in extreme fear despite strong network fundamentals. In May 2026, the DTCC, the backbone of United States securities settlement, announced it would connect its tokenization service to Stellar, with XLM designated as the settlement token and live assets targeted for the first half of 2027.
  • The deal is a genuine long-term, high-conviction catalyst because it links potential institutional securities volume directly to the network, but the 2027 timeline means price until then is driven by speculation and sentiment.
  • The central question for the price is value accrual: whether routing securities settlement through Stellar translates into sustained demand for the XLM token, a question complicated by XLM’s fixed supply with no burn mechanism.
  • Year-end 2026 forecasts span roughly $0.18 at the bearish end to $1.20 to $2.50 in bullish models, a gap that turns on whether the DTCC and other catalysts begin converting fundamentals into token demand.

Stellar (XLM) is trading near $0.18 as of late June 2026, and it presents one of the sharpest disconnects in crypto: a network with strong and growing fundamentals attached to a token sitting near multi-year lows.

XLM is down from a July 2025 high near $0.52, the Fear and Greed reading is mired in extreme fear, and yet the underlying network is arguably healthier than ever, with tokenized real-world assets on Stellar having climbed past $2.83 billion, stablecoin payment volume around $5.5 billion, developer engagement at record highs, and consensus achieved in under six seconds through its Federated Byzantine Agreement design.

Advertisement
Stellar price chart.
Stellar price chart | Source: crypto.news

Into that gap between fundamentals and price landed the most consequential development in Stellar’s recent history: in May 2026, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, the institution that sits at the center of United States securities settlement, announced it would connect its tokenization service to Stellar, with XLM named as the settlement token and live assets targeted for the first half of 2027.

The announcement raised an obvious and high-stakes question for anyone watching XLM: if the backbone of traditional securities settlement is routing tokenized assets through Stellar, what does that mean for the price of the token?

This article answers that question as realistically as possible, separating the genuine significance of the deal from the hype that inevitably surrounds it. It works through where Stellar stands now and why the fundamentals-price gap exists, what the DTCC deal actually is, why it could be a landmark, the all-important value-accrual question of whether network volume translates into token demand, the problem of the 2027 timeline, the other catalysts stacking up around XLM, the supply dynamics that complicate the bull case, what the analysts forecast, and three scenarios for the price.

The aim is to give XLM holders and observers a clear-eyed read rather than either dismissive skepticism or breathless promotion, because the DTCC deal is simultaneously a real, high-conviction catalyst and a development whose price impact is years away and structurally uncertain. The forecasts here are information, not advice. And the thread running through the whole analysis is the same question that haunts every payments-token valuation: does the network’s success actually accrue to the token, or can the volume flow through while the token is bypassed? For Stellar, the DTCC deal makes that question concrete and urgent.

Advertisement

Where Stellar stands and the fundamentals gap

Begin with the disconnect that defines XLM right now, because it is the context for everything the DTCC deal might change. Stellar near $0.18 is down significantly from its July 2025 high near $0.52, and the Fear and Greed reading sits in extreme fear, the same deeply pessimistic sentiment weighing on the broader crypto market.

On the charts, XLM has spent 2026 oscillating, with periods of consolidation around the high teens to low twenties in cents and sharp volatility, including swings of substantial magnitude within single months, but the broad trend has left the token near the lower end of its range and below where it traded a year ago. By the standard technical and sentiment measures, XLM looks like what it is: a beaten-down mid-cap altcoin in a fearful market.

What makes Stellar unusual is that its fundamentals tell a very different story from its price. The value of tokenized real-world assets issued on Stellar has surged past $2.83 billion, growing at a rapid clip, and stablecoin payment volume on the network has reached roughly $5.5 billion, both signs of genuine, growing utility rather than mere speculation. The network supports a large base of accounts and a wide array of fiat and crypto on-ramps, achieves fast and cheap settlement through its consensus design, and has added the Soroban smart-contract platform to enable tokenization and decentralized finance.

Developer engagement is at record levels. This is the crux of the Stellar investment debate: a network whose real-world usage and institutional positioning are strengthening, attached to a token whose price has fallen to multi-year lows. Bulls read the gap as a buying opportunity and evidence of accumulation, on the logic that price will eventually catch up to fundamentals. Skeptics read it as evidence that network usage does not reliably accrue value to the XLM token, which is precisely the question the DTCC deal forces to the center. The fundamentals-price gap is the setup; the DTCC deal is the potential catalyst that either closes it or exposes it as permanent.

Advertisement

What the DTCC deal actually is

To assess its impact, you have to understand precisely what was announced, because the details determine the significance. In May 2026, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation revealed plans to connect its tokenization service to the Stellar network. The DTCC is not a peripheral player; it is the central infrastructure of United States securities settlement, the institution through which an enormous share of the country’s stock and bond transactions are cleared and settled, handling quadrillions of dollars in securities annually across the traditional financial system. Its decision to build tokenization capability on a public blockchain at all is significant, and its selection of Stellar specifically, with XLM named as the settlement token for the infrastructure, is what makes the announcement material for the token. The plan targets live assets in the first half of 2027, meaning the connection is a forward-looking build rather than something already moving volume today.

The stated logic is that tokenization, representing traditional securities as digital tokens on a blockchain, can make settlement faster, cheaper, and programmable, and that Stellar’s compliance-focused, settlement-oriented architecture is suited to regulated finance. The phrase that captured attention is that the arrangement brings the potential for trillions in traditional securities onto the network over time, with XLM as the settlement token directly linking that future institutional volume to token demand. That is the bullish framing, and it is grounded in real fact: the DTCC genuinely chose Stellar, XLM is genuinely named as the settlement token, and the addressable volume is truly enormous. But three qualifications matter from the outset and shape the rest of this analysis.

First, the assets go live in 2027, not now. Second, the scale of what actually migrates onto Stellar, as opposed to the theoretical addressable market, is unknown. And third, and most important for the price, the mechanism by which settlement volume translates into sustained XLM demand is the contested value-accrual question instead of an automatic pass-through. The deal is real and large in potential; what it means for the token depends on details that are not yet settled.

Why it could be a landmark

Taken at its strongest, the DTCC deal is a genuine landmark, and the bull case for its significance deserves a full and fair statement. The first reason is validation. When the institution at the heart of United States securities settlement chooses to build tokenization infrastructure on Stellar, it is an endorsement of Stellar’s architecture for regulated, institutional finance that no marketing campaign could buy. It signals that Stellar’s long-standing bet on compliance and settlement, often overlooked during the speculative manias that drove other chains, is being recognized by exactly the kind of counterparty it was designed to serve. For a network whose pitch has always been institutional and payments-focused instead of retail-speculative, having the DTCC select it is the strongest possible third-party confirmation of the thesis.

Advertisement

The second reason is the direct linkage to token demand, at least in principle. Because XLM is named as the settlement token for the DTCC tokenization infrastructure, future institutional volume flowing through that infrastructure has a potential channel to XLM demand, unlike vaguer partnership announcements that leave the token’s role ambiguous. The third reason is scale and trajectory. The addressable market for tokenized securities is measured in the trillions, and even capturing a modest fraction would represent settlement volume far beyond anything Stellar handles today, which is why the deal is framed as a long-term, high-conviction bullish driver instead of a short-term price catalyst. It fits a broader pattern in which Stellar has positioned itself as compliance-ready infrastructure for tokenization, evidenced by its alignment with regulatory frameworks and its role hosting regulated stablecoins.

The strongest version of the bull case, then, is that the DTCC deal is the moment Stellar’s institutional thesis begins to be validated by the most credible possible counterparty, with a direct potential link to token demand and an addressable market large enough to transform the network’s economics. Whether that potential converts into token price is the next, harder question.

The value-accrual question

Here is where realism has to enter, because the gap between a network landmark and a token price runs straight through the value-accrual question, and Stellar’s situation has a cautionary parallel close at hand. The question is whether routing securities settlement through Stellar actually creates sustained demand for the XLM token, or whether the volume can flow through the network while the token captures little of the value. This is not a hypothetical concern invented for skepticism; it is the same question that has dogged XRP, where Ripple’s commercial success in cross-border payments has not reliably translated into XRP token appreciation, because much settlement activity can occur without participants holding the token for any meaningful duration. Stellar faces a structurally similar issue: a settlement token may be used transiently to bridge value during a transaction without anyone needing to hold XLM as a durable asset, in which case enormous settlement volume could produce only modest, fleeting token demand.

Advertisement

The specifics of how XLM is used in the DTCC infrastructure will determine which way this resolves, and those specifics are not yet fully clear. If XLM is required as a persistent bridge or reserve asset that institutions must hold to access the settlement rails, and if the volume is large, the demand could be substantial and sustained. If, instead, XLM functions as a momentary settlement medium that is acquired and released within transactions, or if stablecoins denominated in dollars do most of the actual value transfer while XLM plays a minimal technical role, then the token demand could be far smaller than the headline volume suggests.

The honest assessment is that the DTCC deal creates a potential channel for value to accrue to XLM, but it does not guarantee that it will, and the magnitude depends on technical and economic details that remain to be seen. This is the single most important caveat for anyone pricing XLM off the DTCC news. The deal could be a genuine landmark for the network and still deliver a muted token-price impact if the value-accrual mechanism is weak, exactly as has happened with XRP. The network’s success and the token’s success are related but not identical, and conflating them is the most common error in valuing payments tokens.

The 2027 timeline problem

Even setting aside the value-accrual question, the DTCC deal carries a timing problem that directly affects how it should be priced today. The plan targets live assets in the first half of 2027, which means that for the entire rest of 2026 and into early 2027, there is no actual DTCC settlement volume flowing through Stellar, only the anticipation of it. This matters because, until the infrastructure goes live and shows real volume, XLM’s price will be driven by speculation and sentiment about the future instead of by current flows, which makes it vulnerable to the same volatility that afflicts any narrative-driven asset. The market has already shown this dynamic, with XLM experiencing sharp moves and pullbacks, including a notable drop after a rally, as enthusiasm about the deal collided with the reality that nothing changes operationally for many months.

The timing problem cuts in two directions, and a fair analysis acknowledges both. On one hand, it tempers the near-term bull case: those expecting the DTCC deal to lift XLM’s price in 2026 are betting on sentiment and positioning instead of on actual usage, and sentiment can fade, reverse, or be overwhelmed by broader market conditions long before 2027 arrives. A deal that goes live in 18  months provides little support for a token if the broad crypto market stays fearful in the meantime.

Advertisement

On the other hand, the long runway means the catalyst is not yet spent: if and when the infrastructure goes live in 2027 and begins showing real volume, that could be a fresh, concrete catalyst at a point when much of the speculative anticipation may have faded, potentially providing an upside surprise to a token that the market had given up on.

For pricing XLM through the rest of 2026 specifically, the timeline problem means the DTCC deal is best understood as a long-term thesis underpinning the token instead of a near-term price driver, and that anyone buying XLM on the DTCC news in 2026 is making a multi-year bet whose payoff, if it comes, is concentrated in 2027 and beyond, contingent on the value-accrual question resolving favorably.

The other catalysts stacking up

The DTCC deal does not stand alone; it sits atop a cluster of other developments that collectively strengthen Stellar’s institutional thesis, and a complete picture has to account for them. The most important is the regulatory designation.

On March 17, 2026, United States regulators designated Stellar as a digital commodity, the same classification extended to a short list of major tokens, which removed a significant barrier by clarifying XLM’s legal status and making it eligible for custodial services from institutions that safeguard assets. That designation is foundational because it is what allows firms to build regulated products on Stellar and to hold XLM with legal confidence, and it underpins the DTCC deal and the others.

Advertisement

Building on it, CME Group XLM futures are expected during 2026, which would provide regulated derivatives infrastructure and a potential structural source of institutional demand and price discovery, and an Amundi fund and other institutional vehicles point to growing traditional-finance engagement with the token.

Several more developments round out the picture. Stellar is widely seen as a beneficiary of the CLARITY Act, the legislation that aims to codify digital-asset rules and that could advance in 2026, in the same way XRP is, since both are payment-focused tokens whose institutional adoption hinges on regulatory certainty. Stellar’s design aligns with European regulatory frameworks, evidenced by regulated stablecoins launching on the network, giving it a compliance posture suited to multiple jurisdictions. And the Soroban smart-contract platform expands what the network can host, broadening its addressable market into tokenization and decentralized finance.

The significance of this cluster is that the DTCC deal is not an isolated bet but part of a coherent institutional thesis: regulatory clarity through the digital-commodity designation and potential CLARITY Act passage, derivatives infrastructure through CME futures, traditional-finance vehicles through funds like Amundi’s, and the flagship tokenization linkage through the DTCC.

If the thesis works, these catalysts reinforce one another, with regulatory clarity enabling the institutional products that enable the volume that could drive token demand. The caveat from the value-accrual discussion still applies to all of them, but the breadth of the catalyst stack is itself a meaningful part of the bull case for XLM.

Advertisement

The supply picture that complicates the bull case

A factor specific to XLM that any honest price analysis must weigh is its supply structure, which cuts against the simplest bullish narratives in an important way.

Following a 2019 community vote, Stellar ended its annual token issuance, fixing the total supply near 50 billion XLM and removing the inflationary dilution that suppresses price appreciation on many rival networks. That fixed supply is truly favorable: it means new issuance does not constantly dilute holders, and if demand rises against a fixed supply, the price pressure is upward. To that extent, the supply structure supports the bull case, and it is a point bulls rightly emphasize.

But there is a crucial qualification that complicates the value-accrual story. Stellar has no token-burn mechanism that meaningfully reduces circulating supply as the network is used. On some networks, transaction activity burns tokens, so that rising usage automatically tightens supply and creates upward price pressure independent of speculative demand, a direct link between network use and token scarcity. Stellar lacks this channel at scale, which means that fee-driven demand from network activity does not automatically remove XLM from circulation.

The implication for the DTCC deal is significant: even if substantial securities settlement volume flows through Stellar, that activity will not, by itself, shrink the XLM supply the way a burn mechanism would, so 1 of the clearest channels through which network usage could force token-price appreciation is absent.

Advertisement

The price would have to rise through genuine, sustained holding demand for XLM as an asset, not merely through transactional throughput, which loops back to the value-accrual question. The fixed supply is a modest positive; the absence of a burn mechanism is a real limitation on how mechanically network success can translate into token-price gains. Together they mean XLM’s bull case depends more heavily on durable demand for the token itself than on raw volume, which raises the bar for the DTCC deal to move the price.

What the analysts forecast

The analyst forecasts for XLM in 2026 span an extraordinarily wide range, even by the standards of the other majors, and the spread maps directly onto the questions this article has raised. At the bearish end, the algorithmic forecaster CoinCodex reads Stellar as bearish on technical indicators and, strikingly, its model does not project XLM reaching $1 until 2047, treating the token as a slow-compounding asset that the current setup does not favor.

Other cautious forecasters cluster low: Traders Union’s model points to roughly $0.40 to $0.48 for year-end, and DigitalCoinPrice sees around $0.32, both well above current levels but far below the bullish targets and treating Stellar as an infrastructure asset that appreciates slowly instead of a narrative rocket. Base-case forecasts that assume regulatory clarity holds and tokenization grows at a moderate pace tend to land in a $0.25 to $0.50 band, a meaningful recovery from current levels without a breakout.

At the bullish end sit forecasters who weigh the institutional catalysts heavily. Coinpedia’s hybrid model is the most bullish of the major platforms for 2026, placing XLM in a moderate range of $1.20 to $1.80 and a stronger scenario toward $2.50 if it reclaims key resistance, explicitly anchoring the thesis in institutional adoption velocity, rising stablecoin and tokenized-asset volume, and the catalysts described above, with a longer-term 2030 target as high as $6.19 under favorable conditions.

Advertisement

CoinLore and others produce aggressive cycle targets in the range of roughly $0.50 to $1.69 for the year. The gap, from a model that does not see $1 until 2047 to 1 targeting $2.50 this year, is enormous, and it reflects exactly the unresolved questions: whether the DTCC deal and the other catalysts convert into token demand, whether the value-accrual mechanism is strong or weak, and whether the 2027 timeline leaves 2026 to sentiment.

The bullish forecasts assume the institutional thesis begins paying off in token demand; the bearish ones assume the fundamentals-price gap persists because usage does not accrue to the token. The forecasts cannot settle which is right; they can only show how much rides on the DTCC deal and its peers actually closing that gap.

Three scenarios for Stellar around the DTCC catalyst

Pulling the analysis into scenarios clarifies the range without pretending to certainty. In the bull scenario, the market begins to price the institutional thesis ahead of the 2027 go-live. Confidence grows that the DTCC deal, the digital-commodity designation, CME futures, and the broader catalyst stack will convert into real XLM demand, an altcoin-favorable phase arrives, and XLM recovers toward the $1.20 to $2.50 range that the most bullish credible models describe, with the fundamentals-price gap finally closing as anticipation of trillions in tokenized volume lifts the token. This path requires the market to look through the 2027 timeline and to bet that the value-accrual question resolves in XLM’s favor, and it leans on the breadth of the catalyst stack as the engine. It is achievable but conditional on a favorable read of exactly the questions that remain open.

In the base scenario, the most defensible central case, XLM recovers modestly to a $0.25 to $0.50 band. Regulatory clarity holds, the catalysts develop roughly on schedule, and the token grinds back up from its lows as the institutional thesis slowly gains credibility, but without a breakout, because the DTCC volume is not live until 2027 and the value-accrual mechanism remains unproven through 2026.

Advertisement

This recovery-without-breakout outcome fits the weight of base-case forecasting and reflects the reality that the biggest catalyst is years from delivering actual volume. In the bear scenario, the fundamentals-price gap persists or widens. The broad market stays fearful, the DTCC anticipation fades as 2027 stays distant, doubts deepen about whether settlement volume will ever accrue to the token given the no-burn supply structure, and XLM stalls in the $0.10 to $0.20 range or drifts lower, validating the bearish models that treat it as a slow-compounding asset. Which scenario unfolds depends on the broad market, the pace of the catalysts, and above all whether the market comes to believe that routing securities through Stellar will create durable demand for XLM. All 3 are live, and the DTCC deal is the pivot around which they turn, a genuine landmark for the network whose translation into token price remains the open question.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DTCC tokenization deal with Stellar?

In May 2026, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, the central infrastructure of United States securities settlement, announced it would connect its tokenization service to the Stellar network, with XLM named as the settlement token and live assets targeted for the first half of 2027. The DTCC clears and settles an enormous share of United States securities transactions, so its decision to build tokenization capability on Stellar is a major institutional endorsement. The arrangement carries the potential to bring tokenized traditional securities onto the network over time, with XLM as the settlement token linking that future volume to potential token demand. It is a forward-looking build, not something moving volume today.

Will the DTCC deal make XLM’s price go up?

It could, but it is not automatic, and the timing and mechanism matter. The deal is a genuine long-term, high-conviction catalyst because it links potential institutional securities volume to the network with XLM named as the settlement token. But assets do not go live until the first half of 2027, so through 2026 the price is driven by speculation instead of actual flows. More fundamentally, whether settlement volume translates into sustained XLM demand is the contested value-accrual question: a settlement token can be used transiently without anyone holding it durably, and Stellar lacks a burn mechanism that would tighten supply as usage grows. The deal could be a landmark for the network and still deliver a muted token-price impact if value accrual is weak.

Why is Stellar’s price so low if its fundamentals are strong?

This is the central Stellar paradox. The network’s fundamentals are strong and growing, with tokenized real-world assets past $2.83 billion, stablecoin payment volume around $5.5 billion, record developer engagement, and fast, cheap settlement, yet XLM trades near $0.18, down from a 2025 high near $0.52, with sentiment in extreme fear. Bulls read the gap as a buying opportunity on the logic that price will catch up to fundamentals. Skeptics read it as evidence that network usage does not reliably accrue value to the XLM token, the same issue that has dogged XRP. The gap exists because network success and token-price appreciation are related but not identical, and the mechanism linking them for XLM is contested.

Advertisement

What is the value-accrual question for XLM?

It is whether routing activity like securities settlement through Stellar actually creates sustained demand for the XLM token, or whether volume can flow through the network while the token captures little value. A settlement token may be used transiently to bridge value within a transaction without anyone needing to hold XLM as a durable asset, in which case large settlement volume could produce only modest, fleeting token demand. This is the same question that has limited XRP’s price despite Ripple’s commercial success. For the DTCC deal, the magnitude of token-price impact depends on whether XLM is required as a persistent bridge or reserve asset or functions only as a momentary settlement medium, details that are not yet fully clear.

Does Stellar’s fixed supply help the price?

Partly, but with an important limitation. Following a 2019 community vote, Stellar ended annual issuance and fixed total supply near 50 billion XLM, removing the inflationary dilution that suppresses many rival tokens, which is favorable because rising demand against fixed supply creates upward price pressure. However, Stellar has no token-burn mechanism that meaningfully reduces circulating supply as the network is used. On some networks, transaction activity burns tokens so that rising usage automatically tightens supply; Stellar lacks this at scale, so fee-driven demand does not automatically remove XLM from circulation. The implication is that even large settlement volume will not shrink supply by itself, so the price must rise through durable holding demand instead of throughput, which raises the bar for catalysts like the DTCC deal

What are analysts forecasting for Stellar in 2026?

The range is extraordinarily wide. At the bearish end, CoinCodex’s model is bearish and does not project XLM reaching $1 until 2047, while Traders Union sees roughly $0.40 to $0.48 and DigitalCoinPrice around $0.32 for year-end, treating XLM as a slow-compounding infrastructure asset. Base-case forecasts that assume moderate growth cluster in a $0.25 to $0.50 band. At the bullish end, Coinpedia models $1.20 to $1.80 and up to $2.50 if resistance is reclaimed, anchored in institutional adoption, with a 2030 target as high as $6.19. The gap, from no $1 until 2047 to $2.50 this year, reflects the unresolved questions of whether the DTCC deal and other catalysts convert into token demand and whether the fundamentals-price gap finally closes.

This article is information, not financial or investment advice. Stellar price levels, network metrics, the DTCC announcement details, and analyst forecasts reflect data available as of June 28, 2026, are point-in-time, and can change. Cryptocurrency is highly volatile, and you can lose money. Price predictions are inherently uncertain, and the scenarios described are not guarantees. Do your own research and consult a qualified financial professional before making any investment decision.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025