Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Trump Sues JPMorgan, CEO Dimon for $5B Over Debanking

Published

on

Best Wallet

Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

US President Donald Trump sued JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its chief executive officer, Jamie Dimon, for at least $5 billion, alleging that the lender stopped offering him and his business banking services for political reasons.

According to the complaint filed on Thursday, Trump accuses the bank of trade libel and breach of the implied covenant of good faith. It also states that Dimon violated Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

The lawsuit, filed in Miami-Dade County court in Florida, alleges that JPMorgan abruptly closed multiple accounts in February 2021 with just 60 days’ notice and no explanation.

By doing so, Trump claims JPMorgan and Dimon cut the president and his businesses off from millions of dollars, disrupted their operations, and forced them to open bank accounts elsewhere urgently.

However, JPMorgan has since denied all allegations. “While we regret that President Trump has sued us, we believe the suit has no merit. We respect the President’s right to sue us and our right to defend ourselves – that’s what courts are for,” said a JPMorgan spokesperson.

Meanwhile, the Trump family has continued to reiterate that the banks had debanked his family for political reasons.

Advertisement

Trump And The Fight Against Debanking

Since retaking office, Trump has signed an executive order against debanking. His appointed regulators, including Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould, have similarly warned banks against engaging in any activities that appear to be debanking, a concern the crypto industry at large has had over the past few years.

“You shouldn’t be debanked,” Trump said to reporters while aboard Air Force One on Thursday. “It’s so wrong. I don’t know what their excuse would be. Maybe their excuse would be the regulators.”

Meanwhile, the family has since turned to crypto as a hedge.

“We got into crypto because we were debanked,” Donald Trump Jr. said in a Fox News interview last year. “We had to come up with solutions,” he continued, adding that crypto was the most efficient way to go and “absolutely the future of banking.”

Related News:

Best Wallet – Diversify Your Crypto Portfolio

Advertisement

Best WalletBest Wallet
  • Easy to Use, Feature-Driven Crypto Wallet
  • Get Early Access to Upcoming Token ICOs
  • Multi-Chain, Multi-Wallet, Non-Custodial
  • Now On App Store, Google Play
  • Stake To Earn Native Token $BEST
  • 250,000+ Monthly Active Users

Best WalletBest Wallet


Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Poloniex and the $1.3B bitcoin question

Published

on

Poloniex and the $1.3B bitcoin question

Justin Sun-owned Poloniex has announced fee-free trading for any user who enrols in its “Poloniex Super” membership, which currently offers 30 days’ worth of fee-free “spot, margin, and futures trading.”

Poloniex has yet to announce what this membership will cost once the 30-day period has elapsed, though it does mention that “[a]fter the trial period ends, you will be automatically enrolled in the basic Super plan by default.”

This product announcement has led users to ask how Poloniex will make money without fees. Sun quickly explained that Poloniex has no need to make more money because “we already made enough from the bitcoin (BTC) we bought in 2012.”

Poloniex was founded in 2014 and therefore couldn’t possibly purchase any BTC in 2012, so presumably Sun is referring to BTC he purchased.

This statement that Poloniex can continue to operate based only on these profits brings to the forefront concerns about how Poloniex has managed the BTC in its reserves.

In 2020 Poloniex offered a new product, which it described at different times as “BTC on TRON” and “BTCTRON.”

This initial announcement described BTCTRON as “a type of wrapped BTC token that exists on the TRON blockchain.”

Advertisement

Poloniex’s Help Center provides us the contract address for this token, TN3W4H6rK2ce4vX9YnFQHwKENnHjoxb3m9.

Reviewing this contract address reveals that this token currently has a circulating supply of 17,545 BTC, worth approximately $1.3 billion.

Disturbingly, Poloniex’s so-called “proof of reserves” claims that Poloniex has a balance of only 11,090 BTC in its entire reserves and 11,082 of those are “User Balance.”

Advertisement

This is insufficient to reserve this tokenized BTC product.

Protos has previously repeatedly reached out to Poloniex during our past reporting on this product, and it has never been willing to provide the addresses that hold the BTC for this tokenized product.

We attempted to reach out to Poloniex again; however, it didn’t provide these addresses before publication.

Read more: FTX estate says Justin Sun still owes it millions

Advertisement

Increasing the concern about this product is how deeply it has been integrated into another Sun-owned exchange, HTX.

At HTX, typically there is more of this mysterious BTCTRON product, which provides no transparency, than real BTC.

As of the most recent HTX snapshot, dated March 1, there were a total of 21,362 BTC on HTX. BTCTRON accounted for 10,291 of those.

There are also an additional 1,212 BTC that are in the form of Sun-advised Wrapped Bitcoin.

Advertisement

As of March 1, there were a total of 21,362 BTC on HTX.

What this means, taken as a whole, is that Poloniex will not disclose where the $1.3 billion in BTC that is supposed to collateralize this product is located.

Yet despite that fact, HTX is willing to make it a massive portion of its reserves, all while Sun claims that Poloniex can afford to offer “fee-free” trading because of the appreciation in the price of bitcoin.

Perhaps instead of making grandiose claims about the value of his BTC, Sun should instead work on solving the apparent BTC shortfall at the exchanges he owns.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

SEC will Consider most Crypto Assets not Securities under Federal Law

Published

on

Cryptocurrencies, Law, Security, SEC, United States

In one of its first actions since signing a memorandum of understanding with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said it would interpret how “non-security crypto assets” fall under federal securities laws.

In a Tuesday notice, the SEC said its interpretation of how to address crypto assets would serve as an “important bridge” as lawmakers in the US Congress consider market structure legislation which will codify how financial regulators oversee digital assets. 

The commission said the interpretation would provide a “coherent token taxonomy for digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities,” address how a “non-security crypto asset” may or may not be considered an investment contract under the SEC’s purview, and clarify federal securities laws on “airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking, and the wrapping of a non-security crypto asset.”

“This is what regulatory agencies are supposed to do: draw clear lines in clear terms,” said SEC Chair Paul Atkins. “It also acknowledges what the former administration refused to recognize -– that most crypto assets are not themselves securities. And it reflects the reality that investment contracts can come to an end.”

Advertisement
Cryptocurrencies, Law, Security, SEC, United States
Source: SEC on X

According to Atkins’ prepared remarks for the DC Blockchain Summit on Tuesday, “only one crypto asset class remains subject to the securities laws” under the interpretation, and those were “traditional securities that are tokenized.” The commission called on market participants to review the interpretation to “better understand the regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC” on cryptocurrencies. 

Related: SEC, CFTC sign memo to regulate crypto, other markets in harmony

The SEC notice came as lawmakers in the US Senate continue to negotiate terms under which they may reach an agreement on a digital asset market structure bill. The legislation is expected to give the CFTC more authority in overseeing cryptocurrencies.

Shakeup in SEC enforcement leadership draws criticism

On Monday, the SEC announced that its enforcement division director, Margaret Ryan, resigned from the agency. Its principal deputy director, Sam Waldon, was named as acting enforcement director.

In response to Ryan’s departure, former SEC official John Reed Stark said “not a single person on this planet” believed the commission’s claims that the enforcement director prioritized investor protection and “renewed focus on holding individual wrongdoers accountable” at the agency.

Advertisement

“The SEC has abandoned its identity,” said Stark on Monday. “It has transformed from the cop on Wall Street’s beat into something far more troubling, a regulatory body that functions less like a law enforcement agency and more like a concierge service for the largest financial players in the country.”

A 19-year veteran of the regulator, Stark was founder and chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Atkins, along with SEC Commissioners Mark Uyeda and Hester Peirce — all Republicans — remain the only three leaders at the agency on a panel intended to consist of a bipartisan group of five members. As of Tuesday, US President Donald Trump had not announced any plans to nominate other commissioners to the SEC or CFTC, which had only one Senate-confirmed member.

Advertisement

Magazine: Clarity Act risks repeat of Europe’s mistakes, crypto lawyer warns