Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Volodymyr Nosov Becomes Co-Owner of Spyker as the Iconic Dutch Automaker Joins W Group

Published

on

Volodymyr Nosov Becomes Co-Owner of Spyker as the Iconic Dutch Automaker Joins W Group

Volodymyr Nosov, founder and president of W Group and WhiteBIT, has acquired a significant stake in Dutch luxury sports car manufacturer Spyker. As part of the transaction, Spyker will become part of the global W Group ecosystem, marking the group’s expansion beyond fintech and digital assets into premium manufacturing and luxury mobility.

For W Group, the investment in Spyker represents more than the acquisition of a stake in an iconic automotive brand. It signals the next phase of the group’s evolution from a fintech and blockchain ecosystem into a diversified international holding company. By expanding into traditional industries and premium manufacturing, W Group aims to bridge the gap between Web3 technologies and established Web2 businesses, creating a business ecosystem where innovation, digital infrastructure, and real-world assets operate within a single strategic framework.

The investment is intended to support the revival and long-term development of one of Europe’s most historic automotive brands. Founded in 1880, Spyker is renowned for its handcrafted sports cars, aviation-inspired design, and limited-production approach that has made the marque highly sought after by collectors worldwide.

Alongside the investment, W Group and Spyker will launch Spyker Digital, a new technology company focused on developing digital infrastructure and ownership solutions for the premium automotive sector. The initiative aims to explore how emerging technologies can enhance customer experience, vehicle ownership, and brand engagement while preserving the exclusivity and craftsmanship that define the Spyker brand.

Advertisement

For many years, I have been invested in rare automobiles and have always admired Spyker’s unique design language and extraordinary heritage,” said Volodymyr Nosov. “Becoming a co-owner of Spyker is both a personal and strategic investment. Our goal is to preserve everything that makes the brand special while helping it enter a new era of growth, innovation, and global relevance. Spyker Digital will become a synergy of the finest traditions of European engineering and the digital economy, where a sports car is integrated with blockchain products and tokens.”

Victor Muller, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Spyker, welcomed the partnership, describing it as a significant milestone in the company’s return to the global automotive market.

The enthusiasm we have seen since announcing the new Spyker C8 Preliator XXV confirms that there is strong demand for the return of Spyker,” said Muller. “With Volodymyr Nosov and W Group joining us as partners, we gain not only long-term strategic support, but also access to technologies and expertise that will help us build the next chapter of the Spyker story.

The investment in Spyker Cars expands W Group’s portfolio beyond fintech and digital assets, adding a premium manufacturing brand with a strong heritage and global recognition. For the W Group of companies, this step is an important part of its long-term strategy to enter traditional non-digital markets. This model of global expansion, in which digital assets and premium physical manufacturing operate within a single technological framework, creates a more multifunctional and resilient business ecosystem.

Advertisement

The Road to Pebble Beach

Spyker’s return starts off with the launch of the new Spyker C8 Preliator XXV at The Quail in Carmel, California, on August 14, followed by a display on the Concept Car Lawn of the Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance on August 16, two of the most prestigious events in the world of automotive luxury.

The technical specifications of the new Spyker C8 Preliator XXV show a significant leap in performance: it boasts 800 bhp from a non-hybrid twin-turbo V8, allowing the car to reach a top speed of 350 km/h (217 mph). 

About W Group 

W Group is a global fintech ecosystem that makes blockchain and crypto easy, secure, and accessible for everyone. It is built on the values of security, professionalism, and innovation, serving 35 million users across 150 countries worldwide. At the center of W Group is WhiteBIT, the largest European crypto exchange by traffic, offering over 900 trading pairs, 340+ assets, and supporting 8 fiat currencies. WhiteBIT collaborates with Visa, FACEIT, FC Barcelona, Juventus FC, and the Ukrainian national football team.

 About Spyker 

Founded in 1880 in the Netherlands, Spyker is one of the world’s oldest ultra-luxury automotive brands, hand-building exclusive hypercars to individual commission. The brand’s rich heritage includes creating the world’s first four-wheel-drive car in 1903, building planes from 1914 to 1918, and participating in Formula One and the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Today, the company produces vehicles exclusively in extremely limited numbers featuring aviation-inspired design elements.

Advertisement

The post Volodymyr Nosov Becomes Co-Owner of Spyker as the Iconic Dutch Automaker Joins W Group appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Used Phone Seller Adds 31x Its AI Deal Value in a Single Day

Published

on

Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) Stock Performance

Shares of Inno Holdings (INHD), a Hong Kong used phone reseller, jumped roughly 3,661% on Monday to close near $39.49 after the company disclosed a $3 million contract to build an AI sales agent.

The one day move added about $95 million in market value, roughly 31 times the size of the deal. The reaction has revived a sharp question about whether AI hype now sets prices that fundamentals cannot support.

Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) Stock Performance
Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) Stock Performance. Source: Yahoo Finance

A Used Phone Trader at the Center of an AI Frenzy

Inno Holdings started as a cold-formed steel construction firm. It later recast itself as an electronics trader that resells used phones from Hong Kong.

The AI pivot is newer still, formalized in an April strategic plan two months before the deal landed.

The most recent quarter brought in $931,911 in revenue against a net loss near $1.08 million. The $3 million contract tops the company’s entire revenue for fiscal 2025, which reached $2.85 million. That full year carried a net loss of about $7.08 million.

Advertisement

“The used mobile phone market is at a pivotal turning point where AI-driven automation can create decisive competitive advantages… We believe this Agreement represents a meaningful step toward digitizing and scaling our operations in this high-growth segment,” read an excerpt in the announcement, citing Inno Holdings CEO Ding Wei, who framed the agreement as a strategic bet on automation.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The move also arrived during a broader AI stock rally that has stretched valuations across the market.

Such gaps have fed Ray Dalio warnings about an overheating AI trade. The new system, meanwhile, stays in early development and is not yet in commercial use.

Reverse Splits Weigh on Inno Holdings Stock

The surge sits on top of a long fight to stay listed. The company has run three reverse stock splits since October 2024. Together they amount to a 1 for 4,800 consolidation aimed at Nasdaq’s $1 minimum bid price rule.

Advertisement

The dilution behind those splits is striking. After a December split, Inno Holdings held about 4.08 million shares. By early May the count had swelled to 50.4 million, almost entirely through new stock sales. A 1 for 20 split then reset it to 2.52 million.

Weeks before the deal, the company opened a $60 million at the market program with Aegis Capital, replacing a $50 million facility from November.

That channel lets it sell fresh shares into any rally without a shareholder vote. The setup mirrors wider AI bubble fears across public markets.

Bubble or Breakthrough?

Skeptics see a textbook case of narrative driven speculation in a thinly traded micro cap.

Advertisement

“A used phone company with $931,000 in quarterly revenue just surged +3,661% in one day after announcing a $3 million AI deal… Every new buyer is funding someone else’s exit. The AI bubble is not just in the trillion dollar companies,” wrote analyst Bull Theory.

Supporters argue automation could lift thin margins in a low cost resale business, echoing the case that AI stocks are not yet overvalued.

Others are less convinced, and Arthur Hayes has warned that the wider trade leans on fragile liquidity.

The distance between a $3 million build order and a $95 million valuation gain still frames the core question.

Coming filings, and any sign the system actually ships, may show which read is right.

Advertisement

The post Used Phone Seller Adds 31x Its AI Deal Value in a Single Day appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin at $62,500 and Waiting: Could Trump Iran Peace Deal Trigger a Major Rally?

Published

on

Bitcoin at $62,500 and Waiting: Could Trump Iran Peace Deal Trigger a Major Rally?

Bitcoin is trading at $62,500, up by 4% from last week’s dip below $60,000 but still sitting nearly 40% below its all-time high. The BTC price recovery has been tentative, held back by a Fear & Greed Index reading in extreme fear territory. Now, Trump spoke about the Iran peace deal that could catapult the market.

U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters after attending the NBA Finals in New York on Tuesday that a deal to end the war with Iran could be reached in “two or three days,” and that the Strait of Hormuz would reopen “immediately” afterward.

For a Bitcoin market starved of macro catalysts, this geopolitical trigger could finally unlock the relief rally. But it’s not the first time Trump has teased the market with a peace deal; this has happened 37 times, per CNN.

Advertisement

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Hormuz Reopening Could Move Bitcoin Price

The Strait of Hormuz carries 17–20 million barrels of crude per day, or 20% of global oil consumption, making it the single most critical energy chokepoint on the planet. A credible deal that reopens it immediately hits oil prices.

Brent Crude Oil Price, TradingView

Lower oil feeds directly into inflation expectations. Cooler inflation expectations shift the Federal Reserve’s rate path calculus, softening real yields. A softer real yield environment weakens the U.S. dollar and loosens the liquidity conditions that have been strangling high-beta assets since mid-2025.

Bitcoin, sitting at the top of the risk spectrum, captures that rotation first and fastest. When Trump declared Netanyahu would have “no choice” but to accept a U.S.-brokered Iran agreement earlier this month, Bitcoin surged 5% to $64,000 in a single session, with Bitcoin ETF inflows reportedly topping $999 million across two days and cumulative spot ETF AUM hitting a 2026 record of $109 billion.

Advertisement
Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

The counter-argument is valid. A headline-driven BTC moves mean-revert fast when structural confirmation doesn’t follow. Trump has previously predicted the Iran conflict would last four to six weeks, and it has now crossed 100 days.

The ceasefire frayed again over the weekend as Iran fired missiles toward northern Israel and Israel responded with what it described as a “large-scale strike on strategic defense systems.” Netanyahu said Tuesday the war “has not yet ended.”

Skepticism is warranted. But with volatility compressed to 30-day readings of just 8% and the Fear & Greed Index at its lowest print in months, even a partial credibility premium attached to a formal deal announcement could produce violent short-covering.

Advertisement

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Bitcoin and Iran Peace Deal: $75K Breakout or $59K Retest?

Bitcoin is currently wedged between immediate support at $62,000 and the next downside level at $61,500. On the upside, resistance clusters at $64,000 and $65,000. RSI is running at approximately 42, with the signal line sitting near 48, a 6-point gap between the two as sellers still have marginal control. Subdued volatility plus extreme fear is a classic setup for explosive moves in either direction when a macro trigger lands.

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Advertisement

The post Bitcoin at $62,500 and Waiting: Could Trump Iran Peace Deal Trigger a Major Rally? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Humanity’s $36 million exploit happened because a ‘multisig’ lived on one laptop

Published

on

Humanity's $36 million exploit happened because a 'multisig' lived on one laptop

Humanity Protocol explained how attackers were able to steal more than $36 million of its H token, and the cause was a serious lapse in how it secured its keys.

In an incident update shared with CoinDesk, the decentralized identity project said the breach started when an employee’s laptop was compromised. The machine held several keys that controlled the project’s token bridges, the tools that move H (and other tokens) between blockchains.

Those bridges ran through multisignature wallets, which require a number of separate keys to approve any change. A multisignature wallet is supposed to spread keys across different people and devices so that no single machine can move funds.

In this case, all the keys were stored on a single device, meaning a compromise allowed the exploier to cross the approval threshold on both chains, Humanity said.

Advertisement

The attacker obtained three of the six keys controlling the bridge’s admin account on Ethereum, enough to seize controls linked to the project’s deployment on the network.

The attacker then transferred ownership to their own wallet, swapped the bridge’s code for a malicious version and drained about 141 million H in one transaction.

In a Telegram message to CoinDesk, Humanity founder Terence Kwok said the team had set up a multisig wallet across four individuals (as it should have).

Humanity suspects that “some of the keys were accidentally backed up to a compromised device during setup,” Kwok said. “We use a licensed custodian for the majority of token treasury, mpc for operations treasury, and for certain contracts multisig keys were set up in one place and then dispersed.

Advertisement

“Unfortunately in this scenario, the keys were backed up on a compromised device,” he said.

The attacker executed similar steps on BNB Chain with three of five keys. This time, installing code with an unlimited mint function, which allowed the creation of tokens at will, and minted about 200 million new H straight to their wallet.

Humanity has since removed the team page from its website. The project said it has halted deposits and withdrawals on the affected bridges and is working with exchanges and the police to recover funds.

Humanity raised $20 million from Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto last year at a $1.1 billion valuation.

Advertisement

ZachXBT, a prominent onchain investigator, said the key compromise and a separate round of suspicious market-making in the token were not connected.

He also raised questions about how the token traded in the weeks before the breach, ahead of a large scheduled token unlock, as H token prices shot up from 20 cents to 70 cents within two weeks.

The token has clawed back some of the lost ground. After falling as low as about 5 cents during the attack, it recovered to around 20 cents, according to CoinGecko data. It remains well below the roughly pre-breach level of 67 cents.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

200 Crypto Companies Just Demanded a Senate Vote on the CLARITY Act, Can They Force a Decision Before July 4?

Published

on

🛡

A coalition of more than 200 crypto companies sent a joint letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on June 7–8, demanding a floor vote on the CLARITY Act “without delay”, with Coinbase, Ripple, Kraken, Circle, Binance US, and Andreessen Horowitz among the most prominent signatories.

The bill cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15–9 on May 14 and was placed on the General Orders Calendar by June 1. No floor vote has been scheduled.

The pressure is real and the window is narrowing. The White House has set a de facto July 4 deadline, Congress faces August recess, and the Senate’s floor schedule is already crowded with competing legislative priorities.

Galaxy Digital has put the bill’s odds of becoming law at roughly 60%, a number that reflects both genuine political momentum and the very specific procedural obstacles that still stand between the CLARITY Act and a Senate vote.

Advertisement

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Clarity ACT Deadline Pressure: Why July 4 and What Happens If the Senate Misses It

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House Crypto Advisor Patrick Witt have both publicly called on lawmakers to advance the CLARITY Act for a July 4 signing by President Donald Trump, framing the date not as a suggestion but as an administration-level expectation.

That gives the Senate roughly three weeks of working legislative time before the symbolism of the deadline collapses.

Advertisement

The math is tight. A floor vote requires Thune to formally schedule debate, allow for amendments through a manager’s amendment process, survive any procedural challenges, and clear 60 votes on cloture, all before the chamber pivots to recess.

Senator Cynthia Lummis signaled the political will is there, stating directly: “We did not come this far to quit at the 5-yard line.” But political will and floor scheduling are two different instruments.

There is also a reconciliation step the timeline often obscures: the Senate Banking Committee version must be merged with the Senate Agriculture Committee’s Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act before any floor vote, since the CLARITY Act’s framework splits jurisdiction between the SEC and the CFTC and both committees have claimed a stake.

Advertisement

That merger is not complete. If the vote does not come before recess, the July 4 target is gone, and the political window that opened it may not reopen on the same terms.

The 60-Vote Problem and Who Is Blocking the Path

The Senate’s filibuster threshold requires 60 votes to advance any major legislation to a final passage vote.

Republicans hold 53 seats, meaning the CLARITY Act needs at minimum seven Democratic crossovers. A prior procedural motion in March cleared 64–33, which demonstrates the vote is theoretically achievable, but a procedural motion is structurally easier than a full cloture vote on a contested market-structure bill.

Advertisement

The bill cleared committee with two Democrats crossing over: Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Senator Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland.

Getting from two to seven on the full floor is a different calculation. Unresolved Democratic concerns include an ethics provision tied to President Trump’s personal crypto holdings, a sticking point that has not been publicly resolved and that could peel off soft supporters under floor pressure.

Banking industry opposition adds a second pressure vector. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has vowed to challenge provisions related to stablecoin yields and what he characterizes as insufficient bank-equivalent regulation for stablecoin issuers.

Advertisement

The CLARITY Act’s framework, which establishes digital assets as either SEC-regulated securities, CFTC-regulated digital commodities, or stablecoins under joint oversight, directly threatens traditional finance’s competitive position in payment infrastructure.

Dimon’s opposition signals that the banking lobby will not sit out the floor fight. The bill cleared committee 15–9. Getting to 60 on the floor is a structurally different problem.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

What to Watch Next

Advertisement

The signal that matters most is whether Thune’s office formally places the CLARITY Act on the active Senate floor schedule in the next two weeks.

A manager’s amendment addressing the ethics provision and the Agriculture Committee reconciliation would indicate the bill is moving toward a genuine vote rather than another procedural stall.

Photo: John Thune

Watch also for whether Dimon and the banking lobby intensify opposition or, under White House pressure, soften their position on the stablecoin yield provisions.

The July 4 deadline is a political construct, not a legal one. But political constructs define legislative windows. If the Senate does not act before recess, the crypto industry will need a new window, and those do not arrive on schedule.

The post 200 Crypto Companies Just Demanded a Senate Vote on the CLARITY Act, Can They Force a Decision Before July 4? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tech Stocks Rally in Pre-Market Trading as Dip Buyers Return Tuesday

Published

on

E-Mini S&P 500 Jun 26 (ES=F)

Key Takeaways

  • Futures point to strong open: Nasdaq 100 up 0.7%, S&P 500 up 0.4%, Dow up 0.2%
  • Semiconductor names including Micron, Nvidia, and Broadcom spearhead recovery
  • OpenAI submits confidential IPO filing, following Anthropic’s move last week
  • Bitcoin trades at $63,090, down 0.3% in the last 24 hours
  • SpaceX IPO could arrive Friday, potentially setting new records

Technology stocks are staging a strong comeback Tuesday morning as Wall Street returns to growth names following the previous week’s artificial intelligence-fueled market decline. For the second consecutive session, tech shares are pacing broader market gains.

Futures contracts on the Nasdaq 100 advanced 0.7%. The S&P 500 futures contract gained 0.4%. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures increased 76 points, representing a 0.2% climb.

E-Mini S&P 500 Jun 26 (ES=F)
E-Mini S&P 500 Jun 26 (ES=F)

Tuesday’s positive momentum extends Monday’s session, when traders aggressively purchased semiconductor manufacturers and high-growth technology companies. Market participants appear willing to capitalize on discounted valuations following last week’s correction.

Semiconductor Sector Leads Recovery

Micron Technology climbed approximately 4% during pre-market hours. Nvidia and Broadcom posted modest gains as well, continuing their rebound from Friday’s sharp declines.

The rally signals sustained optimism surrounding artificial intelligence infrastructure demand, even as inflation anxieties persist. A segment of market watchers fears that stubborn inflation readings might compel the Federal Reserve to implement rate increases in 2025.

“The tech stock pullback was a gift for investors, and we remain buyers on the dips,” said Robert Edwards, chief investment officer at Edwards Asset Management.

Edwards emphasized that robust revenue expansion and profit growth continue to underpin the sector, encouraging institutional buyers to accumulate shares during temporary selloffs.

Advertisement

Market attention now turns to Wednesday’s calendar. The release of consumer price index figures and Oracle’s quarterly financial results could determine whether the current rally maintains momentum or loses steam.

AI Giants Race to Public Markets

Following Monday’s trading session, OpenAI announced it had submitted confidential registration documents for a public stock offering. The filing arrives just seven days after competitor Anthropic initiated its own IPO process.

Both artificial intelligence powerhouses are positioning themselves for potential public market debuts as early as autumn. The simultaneous filings represent a watershed development for the AI sector.

Market observers are also monitoring Friday’s calendar, when SpaceX may complete its public offering. The aerospace company’s listing could establish a new benchmark for the largest market debut on record.

Advertisement

Cryptocurrency Drifts Lower as Greenback Softens

Bitcoin decreased 0.3% during the previous 24-hour period, settling at $63,090. Market strategists indicate the digital asset requires substantial dollar weakness to mount a significant rally.

The U.S. dollar index declined 0.1% versus major trading partners’ currencies. The pullback followed diplomatic progress between Iran and Israel, who committed to suspending recent military confrontations after intervention from President Trump.

Energy markets responded to the geopolitical developments. Brent crude retreated 1.2% to $93.14 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate decreased 1.6% to $89.82.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield edged lower to 4.55%.

Advertisement

As the trading week progresses, market participants remain concentrated on artificial intelligence investments. Wednesday’s inflation report and Oracle’s earnings release will command attention, with SpaceX’s potential Friday offering capping an eventful period for financial markets.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Wall Street will run entirely on the blockchain by 2030, says Brickken CEO

Published

on

Wall Street will run entirely on the blockchain by 2030, says Brickken CEO

The line between traditional finance (TradFi) and crypto is disappearing, with tokenization consistently a dominant narrative of the digital asset industry for a number of years.

Edwin Mata, CEO and founder of tokenization platform Brickken, projects that Wall Street will run entirely on blockchain technology by 2030. Mata told CoinDesk that tech industry buzzwords like “Web3” are fading as major banks adopt the technology for standard financial plumbing, such as settlements and payments.

“The merge between Wall Street and technology is going to dissipate,” Mata said in an interview. “We’re not going to talk anymore about blockchain. It’s merging into fintech.”

While institutional interest in tokenizing real-world assets is growing, driven by major moves like BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, Mata warned that Europe is over-regulating itself out of the race.

Advertisement

This push toward blockchain-native infrastructure was highlighted by Bullish’s (BLSH) $4.2 billion acquisition of transfer agent Equiniti. The deal targets corporate shareholder recordkeeping to ensure shares are issued and recorded directly on-chain from the start, rather than using synthetic digital “wrappers.” Bullish is also the parent company of CoinDesk.

The next shift for tokenization will not be driven by humans, but by software, Mata said. Brickken, a Barcelona, Spain-based tokenization platform that has served as a pathway for bringing $500 million of real-world assets onchain, is currently integrating AI agents to automate the onboarding of assets and the sourcing of liquidity for its 200 clients. .

Mata predicts that traditional software dashboards will soon be replaced by simple chat prompts, where AI agents handle the backend work of finding the best financial yields.

“The decision-maker is not going to be us anymore. It’s going to be AI,” Mata said.

Advertisement

Mata also criticized the European Union’s MiCA regulatory framework, which he said protects legacy banks by imposing expensive, slow-moving compliance rules on small startups.

“Smaller players cannot access the market, which creates a moat for the bigger players,” Mata said. “It can take you nine months [to get a license], and if you’re a startup, nine months without monetizing, you’re dead.”

Startups may choose to move to the UAE and Southeast Asia rather than tackle these steep barriers. Mata believes the U.S. will remain the main powerhouse for crypto innovation simply because it controls the world’s largest capital market, rendering current regulatory disputes in Washington temporary noise.

France-based Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet shared Mata’s criticism. He told CoinDesk the EU’s regulatory framework has transformed the competitive landscape of Web3, unintendedly affecting crypto startups, and instead hugely benefiting legacy financial institutions

Advertisement

Read More: Abra’s Bill Barhydt says Wall Street’s next crypto bet is tokenization

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SBI Shinsei Bank to Reward Deposits with Crypto in Japan

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

SBI Shinsei Bank is piloting a program that rewards ordinary and time-deposit customers with cryptocurrency exchange vouchers tied to their interest payments. According to a Nikkei report, vouchers will be issued equal to 20% of the interest earned, in addition to the standard yen-denominated interest, and can be exchanged for Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) or XRP within a defined redemption window. Access to the vouchers requires opening an account with SBI’s crypto exchange arm, SBI VC Trade. The initiative marks a shift from conventional savings toward a crypto-onramp within a regulated banking framework.

The trial run is set to launch ahead of a permanent rollout, with a three-month campaign that will cover ordinary deposits and time deposits ranging from three months to five years.

Key takeaways

  • Depositors can earn crypto exchange vouchers worth 20% of their interest payments, in addition to standard yen interest.
  • Vouchers are redeemable for BTC, ETH or XRP within a defined window, but require accounts with SBI VC Trade to redeem.
  • The three-month promotional phase targets both ordinary deposits and time deposits (three months to five years) ahead of a long-term plan.
  • The program fits into SBI’s broader push to integrate crypto access points across regulated channels, including exchanges, lending and securities products.
  • Recent SBI moves signal a broader strategy to mainstream crypto: retail USDC lending, potential Bitbank consolidation, and crypto-focused funds from its securities unit.

From savings to on-ramp: SBI’s broader crypto strategy takes shape

The deposit-voucher concept is part of a wider pattern in which SBI Group seeks to embed cryptocurrency access within traditional financial services. The Nikkei report frames the plan as a way to turn conventional savings products into on-ramps for digital assets, potentially exposing a broad base of mainstream bank customers to crypto without requiring an outright purchase.

Earlier this year, SBI’s crypto arm expanded its product line. On March 18, SBI VC Trade launched a retail USDC lending service, enabling users to lend stablecoins to the platform under fixed-term agreements in exchange for a return. The product is structured as a loan to the exchange rather than a bank deposit, which means users assume direct counterparty risk rather than FDIC-style guarantees. This aligns with SBI’s aim to broaden crypto utility across its customer base while maintaining clear risk delineation for end users.

The group has also been actively reorganizing its crypto footprint in Japan. On May 1, SBI announced it was examining a potential acquisition of shares in Bitbank, a major trading venue, with the intention of making it a consolidated subsidiary. The move followed SBI VC Trade’s absorption of Bitpoint Japan the previous month, signaling a push toward greater consolidation in the country’s crypto exchange landscape.

Advertisement

Beyond trading venues, SBI’s securities arm is positioning itself to offer crypto investment products. Reports indicate SBI Securities plans to distribute funds developed by SBI Global Asset Management, including crypto-focused investment trusts and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) centered on assets like BTC and ETH. Taken together, these steps illustrate a deliberate strategy to provide crypto access through regulated, traditional financial channels—from deposits and custody to trading and investment products.

Implications for investors, users and the broader market

By tying crypto vouchers to deposit interest, SBI is lowering the barrier to crypto exposure for ordinary savers who might not otherwise engage with digital assets. For investors, the model creates a visible link between traditional income streams and crypto assets, albeit via a structured product that relies on the bank’s ability to issue and redeem vouchers through its exchange arm. The approach also emphasizes the counterparty risks inherent in SBI’s USDC lending offering, where users lend stablecoins to the platform rather than participating in a bank-backed product.

In Japan, SBI’s multi-pronged approach—from on-ramp deposits to lending and securities products—reflects a broader market shift toward regulated crypto access. If successful, the program could accelerate mainstream adoption and push other financial institutions to test on-ramps within compliance frameworks. However, observers will be watching for details such as redemption windows, voucher liquidity, tax treatment of voucher-derived crypto, and the regulatory stance on hybrid products that blend traditional savings with digital assets.

Market participants should also monitor the evolving landscape of SBI’s ecosystem moves, including the Bitbank consolidation and the roll-out of crypto funds via SBI Securities. These developments could influence liquidity, competition among Japanese exchanges, and the availability of crypto investment options through traditional savings and investment vehicles. As SBI expands its footprint across deposits, lending and securities, it is carving a blueprint for how a major financial group could normalize crypto access while navigating the associated risk and compliance considerations.

Advertisement

Readers should keep an eye on how the redemption mechanics are implemented in practice and what this means for user experience, pricing, and tax implications. The coming weeks will reveal more details on the redemption window, eligible deposits, and any caps or fees tied to the voucher program, as well as how these crypto access points perform alongside existing SBI offerings.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

The Economics of AI Data Markets

Published

on

The Economics of AI Data Markets

For years, crypto has transformed how people think about money, ownership, and digital assets. Now, a new asset class is emerging at the intersection of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology: data.

As AI models become more powerful, the demand for high-quality datasets is exploding. The companies and individuals who control valuable data may soon hold one of the most important resources in the digital economy. Just as oil fueled the industrial age and computing powered the internet age, data is becoming the fuel of the AI era.

The question is no longer whether data has value—it is who owns it, who profits from it, and how it will be traded.

Why Data Is Becoming a Commodity

Every AI system depends on data.

Advertisement

Large language models require text datasets. Image generators need billions of images. Recommendation engines rely on user behavior data. Autonomous systems need real-world sensor information.

As AI adoption accelerates, quality data is becoming increasingly scarce and valuable. Organizations are beginning to realize that proprietary datasets can create competitive advantages that are difficult to replicate.

This creates a new market dynamic where data itself becomes a tradable asset.

Just as commodities such as gold, oil, or electricity have markets, AI may create global marketplaces where datasets are bought, sold, licensed, and exchanged.

Advertisement

The Problem of Data Ownership

Today’s internet economy has a major imbalance.

Users generate enormous amounts of valuable information through social media activity, browsing habits, purchases, conversations, and digital interactions. Yet most of the economic value is captured by large technology platforms.

Individuals rarely receive compensation despite being the source of the data.

AI is bringing this issue into sharper focus. If an AI model learns from content, behavior, or information generated by millions of people, should those contributors receive a share of the value created?

Advertisement

Many blockchain-based projects argue the answer is yes.

Tokenized ownership systems could allow individuals to maintain control over their data while selectively granting access to AI developers in exchange for compensation.

This shift could fundamentally change the economics of digital ownership.

Decentralized AI Training

Traditional AI development is highly centralized.

Advertisement

Large corporations collect datasets, train models, and capture most of the resulting profits. Access to both data and computing resources is concentrated among a small number of players.

Decentralized AI seeks to change that model.

Using blockchain networks, contributors can provide datasets, computing power, or model improvements while receiving rewards for their participation.

In a decentralized training ecosystem:

Advertisement
  • Data providers contribute valuable datasets.
  • Compute providers supply processing power.
  • Developers improve models and algorithms.
  • Token incentives coordinate participation.

Instead of a single company controlling the entire process, AI development becomes a collaborative network economy.

This approach mirrors how decentralized finance replaced traditional financial intermediaries with open protocols.

Data Monetization: A New Digital Income Stream

One of the most exciting opportunities in AI data markets is direct data monetization.

Imagine being able to:

  • License your content to AI models.
  • Earn revenue from proprietary datasets.
  • Sell specialized industry knowledge.
  • Monetize IoT and sensor-generated information.
  • Participate in data-sharing networks while maintaining privacy controls.

In this model, data becomes a productive asset capable of generating ongoing revenue.

Businesses may also benefit from unlocking value from previously underutilized datasets. Healthcare records, supply-chain information, scientific research, and financial datasets could become important components of future AI marketplaces.

Advertisement

The result is an entirely new category of digital economic activity.

The Role of Blockchain

Blockchain technology provides the infrastructure needed to support AI data markets.

Smart contracts can automate payments, verify ownership, track usage rights, and distribute rewards without relying on centralized intermediaries.

Key benefits include:

Advertisement
  • Transparent ownership records
  • Permissionless participation
  • Automated royalty payments
  • Auditable data usage
  • Global accessibility

These features make blockchain a natural complement to AI-driven economies.

Challenges Ahead

Despite the opportunity, significant challenges remain.

Questions regarding privacy, intellectual property rights, data quality, and regulatory compliance remain unresolved.

Data markets must also address:

  • Fraudulent or low-quality datasets
  • Data provenance verification
  • Fair compensation mechanisms
  • Privacy-preserving AI training
  • Cross-border legal frameworks

The success of AI data markets will depend on balancing openness with trust and accountability.

Conclusion

AI is creating unprecedented demand for high-quality data, transforming information into one of the world’s most valuable digital resources.

Advertisement

As decentralized networks emerge, ownership and monetization models are likely to evolve beyond today’s platform-driven economy. Individuals may gain greater control over their data, contributors may earn rewards for participation, and AI development could become more open and collaborative.

The next major crypto commodity may not be a token, a blockchain, or a financial asset.

It may be the data itself.

And the platforms that successfully connect AI demand with data supply could become some of the most important economic infrastructure of the coming decade.

Advertisement
REQUEST AN ARTICLE

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Is now the time to buy the dip? A framework, not a cheer

Published

on

U.S. democrats urge crackdown on potential insider trading in prediction markets

“Buy the dip” is the most-searched, most-repeated, and most-dangerous phrase in crypto during a downturn, and in mid-2026 it is everywhere.

Summary

  • More than 10 million BTC sitting at unrealized losses supports the argument that capitulation may be nearing exhaustion.
  • Extreme fear and whale accumulation favor buying, but weak ETF demand and hostile macro conditions argue for caution.
  • A disciplined decision depends on time horizon, financial resilience, asset quality, and the ability to withstand further declines.
  • Dollar-cost averaging reduces timing risk and avoids turning a long-term thesis into an all-in bet on the exact bottom.

With Bitcoin down sharply toward the $60,000 region, the Fear and Greed Index in extreme fear, and on-chain data showing more than 10 million BTC held at a loss, the question dominating crypto searches and group chats is whether now is the moment to buy.

Most of the answers on offer are cheers, “buy the dip” shouted as a slogan by people who want prices to go up, with no framework behind it.

Advertisement

This piece is not that.

It is a decision framework instead of a cheer, built to help you think through whether buying this dip makes sense for you, because the honest answer is that it depends on factors specific to your situation, the actual signals in the market, and a clear-eyed view of what could go wrong.

The phrase “buy the dip” assumes the dip is a dip and not the start of a longer decline, and the entire question is whether that assumption holds.

This piece walks through the real signals pointing both ways, the framework for deciding, and the disciplined ways to act if the answer is yes.

Advertisement

Why “buy the dip” is dangerous as a slogan

Before building the framework, it is worth understanding why the phrase itself is a trap when treated as a slogan rather than a question, because the framing error causes real damage.

“Buy the dip” embeds an assumption that is the entire question in disguise: that what you are looking at is a dip, a temporary decline within a larger uptrend, not the early or middle stage of a sustained bear market.

A dip is a buying opportunity by definition because the price recovers. A bear market is a value trap because the price keeps falling and the buyer catches a falling knife.

Advertisement

The phrase “buy the dip” smuggles in the conclusion that it is a dip, which is precisely what cannot be known in advance, and that is why treating it as a slogan rather than a question is dangerous.

The people cheering “buy the dip” are assuming the answer to the only question that matters.

The danger is compounded by who tends to shout the phrase loudest and when.

“Buy the dip” reaches peak volume during sell-offs, when existing holders, who want prices to recover so their own positions improve, are most motivated to encourage buying, and when the emotional pull to “do something” is strongest.

Advertisement

This is exactly the moment when the assumption embedded in the phrase is most likely to be wrong, because severe declines that prompt loud “buy the dip” chatter are sometimes dips and sometimes the middle of much larger declines.

Buying every dip works in a bull market and is ruinous in a bear market, and the slogan offers no way to tell which environment you are in, which is the only thing that matters.

The history is sobering.

Investors who “bought the dip” in early 2018 or early 2022, when prices had fallen substantially and the phrase was everywhere, often bought into declines that continued for many more months and much lower prices.

Advertisement

Those were not dips but the early stages of bear markets that ran 77% to 84% from the highs.

The same phrase that correctly identified buying opportunities during bull-market corrections destroyed capital when applied indiscriminately to the start of bear markets.

The lesson is not that buying declines is always wrong. It is that “buy the dip” as an automatic reflex, without a framework to distinguish a dip from a bear market, is how people lose money trying to be opportunistic.

The phrase needs to be replaced with a question: Is this a dip, and even if it is, should I buy it?

Advertisement

The signals pointing toward “yes”

A serious framework weighs the real evidence on both sides, and in mid-2026 there are genuine signals suggesting this could be a dip worth buying.

Laying them out honestly is the first half of the decision.

The strongest bullish signal is the on-chain capitulation data, which suggests selling pressure may be exhausting.

By early June 2026, approximately 10.46 million BTC were held at unrealized losses, crossing the threshold above which major macro bottoms have historically formed.

Advertisement

The logic is that when more than 10 million coins are underwater, a vast majority of short-term speculators have been washed out, and selling pressure fundamentally fades because the people who would panic-sell have mostly already done so.

The Short-Term Profit Ratio falling below 1 confirms that short-term holders are selling at a loss, the capitulation pattern that has historically preceded bottoms.

These metrics do not guarantee a bottom, but they are the conditions from which bottoms have formed, which is a genuine point in favor of buying.

The second bullish signal is extreme-fear sentiment, which is a contrarian indicator.

Advertisement

The Fear and Greed Index buried in extreme fear, the record “Bitcoin to zero” searches, and the broad despair are the emotional conditions that have historically marked accumulation opportunities.

Maximum fear has tended to cluster near bottoms more than before further collapses.

Every prior extreme-fear event this cycle marked a buying opportunity for patient investors, and the contrarian logic, be greedy when others are fearful, points toward buying when sentiment is this bad.

The crowd is maximally afraid, and the crowd at its most afraid has historically been wrong about the direction.

Advertisement

The third bullish signal is smart-money behavior and valuation.

On-chain data shows whales, the largest holders, accumulating into the decline while retail capitulates, the classic transfer from weak hands to strong hands that builds bottoms.

Some corporate treasuries continued buying the dip even as ETFs sold.

Advertisement

On valuation, a closely watched metric shows Bitcoin’s market price getting close to its realized fair value after the sell-off, suggesting the price is approaching levels that have historically represented value rather than froth.

Institutional voices such as Bernstein have maintained year-end targets far above current levels, characterizing the drawdown as the “weakest bear case in Bitcoin’s history.”

Smart money is accumulating, valuation is approaching fair value, and credible institutions see substantial upside, all of which support the dip-buying case.

The signals pointing toward “no”

An honest framework gives equal weight to the bearish signals, and in mid-2026 there are real reasons for caution that dip-buying cheerleaders tend to ignore.

Advertisement

This is the second half of the decision.

The strongest bearish signal is that the institutional bid has weakened, which is new and concerning.

When Bitcoin returned to the $60,000 level in June, ETF investors did not buy the dip the way they had in February. Instead, they opted for larger-scale redemptions, with the record 13-day outflow streak draining billions.

This matters because institutional ETF demand was the structural support that cushioned prior declines, and its reversal removes a key buyer at exactly the moment the dip-buying case needs it.

Advertisement

The fact that institutions, with their research and capital, chose to sell instead of buy this dip is a meaningful vote against the bullish thesis.

It also distinguishes this decline from the February sell-off that institutions did buy.

The second bearish signal is the hostile macro environment, which shows no sign of turning.

The Federal Reserve has signaled rates will remain on hold, with markets pricing out meaningful cuts through 2026.

Advertisement

The 10-year Treasury yield remains elevated around 4.43%, suppressing risk appetite, inflation concerns persist, and geopolitical risk from the U.S.-Iran conflict adds pressure.

These are the forces that drove the decline, and none of them has reversed.

Buying the dip into an unchanged hostile macro backdrop means betting that the price recovers despite the conditions that caused the fall still being in place, which is a weaker bet than buying into improving conditions.

The macro that broke the market is still broken.

Advertisement

The third bearish signal is the technical structure and analyst warnings.

The decline broke key support levels, and the market sits at a critical point where the $60,000 level is the line between recovery and a deeper breakdown toward $50,000.

Some analysts characterize the current bounce as a fragile counter-trend rally fueled by short covering rather than a fundamental shift.

Standard Chartered, while bullish over the longer term, warned of a possible dip toward $50,000 before any recovery, and analysts have flagged that losing key support could open the door to lower prices.

Advertisement

Four-year-cycle analysts also point to the possibility of a deeper bottom.

The technical and analytical picture includes credible scenarios where this is not the bottom and meaningful further downside remains.

Buying now therefore risks catching a knife that has not finished falling.

The framework for deciding

With both sides laid out, the actual framework for deciding whether to buy this dip comes down to a set of questions about your situation and discipline, not a market call.

Advertisement

This is the heart of the piece.

The first question is your time horizon, and it is the most important.

If you are a long-term investor with a multi-year horizon who believes in Bitcoin’s structural case, the question of whether this exact moment is the bottom matters far less.

Over a multi-year period, buying somewhere in the zone of extreme fear and deep capitulation has historically been rewarded, even if the buyer does not identify the exact low.

Advertisement

If you are a short-term trader hoping for a quick bounce, the question is entirely different and far harder.

The fragile-counter-trend-rally warnings and deeper-downside scenarios mean a short-term buy could easily be underwater quickly.

The same dip can be a buy for the long-term investor and a trap for the short-term trader, so the first thing the framework demands is honesty about which one you are.

The second question is whether you can afford to be wrong.

Advertisement

Buying the dip means accepting that the price could fall further, potentially much further, before any recovery.

Even in the bullish case, analysts warn of a possible move toward $50,000 first, and in the bearish case, the downside is larger.

The disciplined buyer only deploys capital they can afford to see decline substantially and hold through, without being forced to sell at a loss by financial pressure or emotional panic.

If a further 20% or 30% decline would force you to sell or cause unbearable stress, you cannot afford to buy this dip regardless of how attractive the signals look.

Advertisement

You would likely capitulate at the worst moment.

The framework requires matching position size to your genuine ability to withstand being wrong.

The third question is whether you have a plan that removes emotion from execution.

Advertisement

The worst way to buy a dip is impulsively, in a single lump, driven by the fear of missing the bottom, because that maximizes the damage if you are early.

The disciplined approach is dollar-cost averaging, buying in planned increments over time, which accepts that you will not identify the exact bottom in exchange for not betting everything on a single timing call.

By spreading purchases across the zone of extreme fear and capitulation, you ensure you participate if this is the bottom while limiting the damage if it is not.

It also removes the emotional pressure of trying to time the precise low.

Advertisement

The framework strongly favors a planned, incremental approach over an all-in timing bet, because the honest truth is that no one, including analysts on both sides, knows exactly where the bottom is.

The mistakes dip-buyers make

Beyond the decision of whether to buy, the framework is incomplete without understanding the specific mistakes that turn dip-buying from a sound strategy into a destructive one.

Most of the damage comes from execution errors rather than from the decision itself.

The first and most common mistake is going all-in at once, driven by the fear of missing the bottom.

Advertisement

A dip-buyer who deploys all available capital in a single purchase is making a precise timing bet: that this exact price is the bottom.

That is the one thing the framework establishes cannot be known.

If the buyer is early, which is likely given that bottoms are zones rather than points and bear markets can last months, there is no capital left to buy lower.

The buyer is immediately underwater and maximally exposed to the emotional pressure to panic-sell if the decline continues.

Advertisement

The all-in dip buy converts a sound long-term thesis into a fragile short-term timing bet, and it is the single most destructive thing a dip-buyer can do.

The discipline of buying in increments exists precisely to avoid this error.

The second mistake is buying with money you cannot afford to hold through further declines.

Dip-buyers frequently deploy capital they need in the near term, or capital whose loss they cannot emotionally tolerate, on the assumption that recovery will be quick.

Advertisement

When the decline continues, as it often does, they are forced to sell at a loss by financial necessity or driven to panic-sell by stress.

That locks in exactly the loss they were trying to avoid and produces capitulation at the worst moment.

The framework’s requirement to deploy only capital you can afford to be wrong about, and to hold through, exists to prevent this.

A dip-buyer who can hold survives being early. A dip-buyer who cannot hold is destroyed by it.

Advertisement

Buying the dip with the wrong money turns a survivable mistake into a fatal one.

The third mistake is abandoning the quality filter in the hunt for the biggest bargains.

During a crash, the assets that have fallen the most look like the biggest opportunities, but the largest declines often belong to the weakest projects that will not recover.

The altcoin devastation of 2026 and stress across individual ecosystems illustrate the risk.

Advertisement

Dip-buyers who chase the most beaten-down names, reasoning that they have the most upside, frequently buy assets falling for fundamental reasons that will keep falling or die entirely.

The discipline of concentrating dip-buying on quality assets with the staying power to survive a bear market and participate in the recovery separates productive dip-buying from catching falling knives in names that never bounce.

The biggest discount is not necessarily the best opportunity.

The best opportunity is a quality asset at a discount, which is a different thing.

Advertisement

The through-line of all three mistakes is that they substitute emotion and greed for discipline.

Going all-in is greed and fear of missing out. Buying with the wrong money is impatience and overconfidence. Chasing the biggest losers is greed for maximum upside.

The framework’s antidotes—increments, affordable capital, and a quality filter—are all forms of imposing discipline on the emotional pull that a crash creates.

Dip-buyers who perform well are not the ones who time the bottom perfectly, which is impossible.

Advertisement

They are the ones who execute with discipline regardless of where the bottom turns out to be, which is entirely within their control.

Whether to buy the dip is a judgment call the framework helps you make. How to buy it is a discipline the framework demands, and the second matters as much as the first.

How to act if the answer is yes

For those whose answers to the framework questions point toward buying, the final piece is disciplined execution, because how you buy matters as much as whether you buy.

The core principle is to accept that you will not time the bottom and to build that acceptance into your approach.

Advertisement

The on-chain signals—the more than 10 million coins at a loss, the SOPR below 1, whale accumulation, and the approach toward realized value—suggest the market is in the zone where bottoms form.

However, a zone is not a point, and prices can fall further or move sideways for an extended period before recovering, as bear markets historically last eight to twelve months.

The disciplined buyer treats the current period as an accumulation zone to buy through gradually, not a single moment to buy all at once.

That is the practical application of the dollar-cost-averaging discipline the framework demands.

Advertisement

You are buying a range, not a bottom.

The second principle is to focus on quality and respect that some assets falling in the crash will not recover.

The contrarian, buy-when-fearful logic applies most reliably to high-quality assets with durable fundamentals and the structural staying power to survive a bear market and participate in the eventual recovery.

Buying the dip indiscriminately, treating every fallen token as a bargain, ignores that bear markets permanently kill weaker projects.

Advertisement

The framework’s quality filter means concentrating any dip-buying on the assets most likely to be there for the recovery, not the most beaten-down names, which are often beaten down for reasons.

The honest synthesis, and the answer to the question the title poses, is that whether now is the time to buy the dip truly depends.

The framework is the way to decide, not the cheer.

The signals are genuinely mixed.

Advertisement

On-chain capitulation, extreme fear, whale accumulation, and the approach toward fair value point toward a dip worth buying.

The weakened institutional bid, hostile and unchanged macro conditions, and credible deeper-downside scenarios point toward caution and the risk of catching a falling knife.

For a long-term investor who can afford to be wrong, who buys quality, who deploys capital gradually through the zone rather than all at once, and who can hold through further declines without being forced to sell, the framework supports buying this dip as part of disciplined accumulation.

That conclusion comes with full awareness that the exact bottom cannot be timed and further downside is possible.

Advertisement

For a short-term trader hoping for a quick bounce, the framework advises far more caution because the fragile-rally and deeper-downside scenarios make the short-term bet substantially riskier.

The phrase “buy the dip” offers a slogan. The framework offers a decision, and the decision is yours to make based on your horizon, capacity to be wrong, and discipline, not on the volume of the cheering.

The right question is never simply, “Is it time to buy the dip?”

It is: “Is this a dip I can afford to be wrong about, bought in a way that survives being early?”

Advertisement

Only you can answer that.

This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. The figures and analysis described reflect data available as of June 2026. Always do your own research and consult with qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

OKX adds Magnificent 7 stocks and commodities to European X Perps offering

Published

on

OKX adds Magnificent 7 stocks and commodities to European X Perps offering

OKX has expanded its X-Perps offering in Europe with 13 new markets, adding futures linked to major U.S. technology stocks, commodities, and stock indices after reporting a 447% rise in X-Perps trading volume since May 1.

Summary

  • OKX has launched 13 new X Perp markets in Europe, adding exposure to major U.S. tech stocks, commodities, and stock indices.
  • The exchange said X Perps trading volume has risen more than 447% since May 1 as demand for the product continues to grow.
  • European users can now access markets such as SPY and QQQ through OKX’s MiCA and MiFID II licensed platform.

According to a press release shared with crypto.news, retail users across Europe can now trade perpetual futures tied to Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla, alongside Gold, Silver, WTI Crude Oil and Brent Crude Oil. The exchange has also introduced SPY and QQQ X-Perps, providing price exposure to the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 through a regulated platform available to European customers.

Set to expand further, the product lineup will include a SpaceX-linked X-Perp on June 12 following the company’s IPO, according to the exchange. All contracts are available around the clock and support leverage of up to 10x.

Advertisement

Erald Ghoos, CEO of OKX Europe, said European investors closely follow earnings reports, central bank decisions, commodity prices and geopolitical developments but have lacked practical ways to react immediately through a single platform.

“X-Perps fix that. One account, every market, 24/7. And because we’re fully regulated, our customers get the protections that come with that,” Ghoos said.

Unlike traditional brokerage products that operate within market hours, the contracts allow users to maintain capital on one platform and move between crypto and traditional asset exposure without opening separate accounts, according to the company.

Advertisement

Volume growth and regulatory positioning

Recent trading activity suggests growing interest in the product category. Ghoos stated that X-Perps trading volume has increased by more than 447% since May 1, adding that the company expects demand to continue as additional markets are introduced.

OKX noted that SPY has returned 25% over the past 12 months while QQQ has gained 42% during the same period. The exchange also pointed to the size difference between investment vehicles tracking those indices, stating that the largest European ETF manages roughly $20 billion in assets while SPY holds about $700 billion.

For European retail investors, access to U.S.-linked index exposure has often been limited by regulatory requirements. According to the company, X-Perps provide access through a platform operating under both MiCA and MiFID II authorizations.

Regulatory compliance has become increasingly important as the European Union’s MiCA transition period approaches its July 1, 2026 deadline. Once the transition period ends, exchanges without the required licenses will no longer be permitted to offer crypto services across the European Economic Area.

Advertisement

The launch arrives during a period of expansion for the exchange beyond its core trading business. In May, OKX Ventures agreed to acquire a 19.6% stake in South Korean exchange Coinone through an 80 billion won ($53 million) investment, a transaction that the companies said would strengthen cooperation on security systems, risk management and user protection.

A month earlier, the company introduced its Agent Payments Protocol, an open framework designed to allow AI agents to manage commercial activities such as payments, settlements, escrow and dispute handling across multiple blockchains. OKX said the protocol was developed to support AI-driven commerce and builds on its existing blockchain infrastructure.

Those developments, alongside the latest X-Perps rollout, add to the company’s efforts to expand regulated products and infrastructure services across multiple markets.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025