Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

What Is the Right White Label Tokenization Platform for You?

Published

on

Why Does Your White Label Neo Bank Solution Need A2A Payments

Tokenization at enterprise scale is fundamentally an architectural decision. While market conversations often emphasize speed of deployment, the true determinant of long-term viability lies in the structural integrity of the underlying white label tokenization platform.

Smart contract modularity, compliance logic programmability, interoperability layers, custody integrations, and upgrade mechanisms collectively define whether the system can withstand regulatory evolution and transaction scale. Selecting white label tokenization software without evaluating its contract architecture and governance design introduces systemic limitations that compound over time.

The decision framework must therefore begin at the infrastructure layer — not the user interface.

What Is a White-Label Tokenization Engine?

A white-label tokenization engine is a pre-built, customizable blockchain-based infrastructure that enables organizations to issue and manage tokenized assets under their own brand.  A white-label tokenization engine is faster to market than a custom-built solution, but still allows for customization and configuration of compliance.

Advertisement

Core capabilities include:

  • Token issuance and lifecycle management
  • Compliance rule enforcement
  • Investor onboarding and KYC integration
  • Governance and voting modules
  • Smart contract management
  • Asset reporting dashboards

When supported by robust white label tokenization development services, such platforms allow enterprises to retain strategic control while minimizing infrastructure risk.

Why the Choice of Tokenization Engine Impacts Long-Term Scalability

Enterprises looking to establish themselves in regulated digital asset markets will find that scalability is about much more than just transaction throughput; it also includes aspects such as regulatory elasticity, architectural modularity, liquidity enablement, operational automation, and ecosystem interoperability.

In this case, the white label tokenization platform will become your programmable underpinning that helps determine if growth will be seamless or stifled by the architecture of your tokenization platform infrastructure

Choosing robust enterprise white label tokenization solution will allow you to scale without having to continually re-build your infrastructure to support the new level of growth. Instead, scalability will be part of the smart contract architecture, governance logic and integration stack from the very beginning.

Advertisement

1. Regulatory Elasticity and Compliance Automation

Regulatory environments are dynamic. Jurisdictional policies evolve, disclosure requirements expand, and investor eligibility criteria shift over time. A technically mature white label tokenization software solution must therefore incorporate a configurable compliance rule engine rather than static rule sets.

Scalable compliance architecture should support:

  • Jurisdiction-based transfer restrictions
  • Role-based investor permissions
  • Whitelisting and blacklisting logic embedded at contract level
  • Automated dividend and reporting triggers
  • On-chain audit trail generation

When compliance is deeply integrated into smart contract logic, enterprises can scale across borders without redeploying infrastructure. Organizations leveraging robust white label tokenization development services benefit from programmable regulatory adaptability instead of reactive redevelopment cycles.

2. Modular Smart Contract Architecture and Upgradeability

Long-term scalability depends on modularity. Monolithic contract deployments restrict flexibility and introduce systemic risk during updates. A future-ready white label tokenization platform must employ structured contract patterns such as proxy upgrade mechanisms, modular deployment layers, and governance-controlled upgrade pathways.

Scalable architecture includes:

Advertisement
  • Separation of logic and storage contracts
  • Version-controlled contract upgrades
  • Governance-based modification approvals
  • Emergency pause and recovery mechanisms
  • Deterministic permission hierarchies

A capable white label tokenization platform development company ensures that upgradeability does not compromise security, enabling protocol evolution without disrupting active tokenized assets.

3. Multi-Asset and Multi-Chain Interoperability

Enterprises rarely tokenize a single asset class. Over time, expansion into real estate, debt instruments, equity, structured funds, or commodities becomes a strategic objective. The selected enterprise white label tokenization solutions framework must therefore support multi-asset issuance under a unified infrastructure.

Scalability requires:

  • Compatibility with multiple token standards
  • Configurable token economics models
  • Cross-chain deployment capability
  • API-driven interoperability with exchanges and custodians
  • Bridge mechanisms for liquidity routing

An interoperable white label tokenization software stack prevents vendor lock-in and supports ecosystem expansion without structural redesign.

4. Liquidity and Secondary Market Enablement

Token scalability is incomplete without liquidity scalability. The ability to integrate secondary trading platforms, digital custodians, and automated settlement layers determines whether tokenized assets achieve sustainable market participation.

A scalable white label tokenization platform should enable:

Advertisement
  • Transfer restriction logic aligned with exchange standards
  • Custodial wallet compatibility
  • Atomic settlement automation
  • Fractional ownership models
  • Yield distribution and dividend automation

Well-architected white label tokenization development services embed liquidity readiness within the core system rather than retrofitting it later.

5. Performance Engineering and Infrastructure Scaling

As investor participation increases, transaction volume grows. Scalability must extend to system performance, including gas optimization, throughput management, and infrastructure redundancy.

Enterprise-grade enterprise white label tokenization solutions incorporate:

  • Layer-2 compatibility or sidechain deployment options
  • Gas-efficient contract design
  • Cloud-native infrastructure orchestration
  • Horizontal scaling capability
  • Disaster recovery and failover mechanisms

Without these controls, operational strain increases as adoption grows.

6. Data Orchestration and Reporting Scalability

Institutional markets demand transparency. As asset portfolios expand, reporting complexity intensifies. A scalable white label tokenization software framework must integrate:

  • Real-time dashboard analytics
  • Automated investor statements
  • Regulatory reporting exports
  • On-chain/off-chain data synchronization
  • Event-driven accounting automation

Data orchestration scalability ensures compliance continuity and investor confidence during growth phases.

7. Governance and Operational Automation

As ecosystems grow, manual oversight becomes inefficient. A technically advanced white label tokenization platform should support automated governance mechanisms, including:

Advertisement
  • On-chain voting modules
  • Role-based administrative controls
  • Multi-signature authorization flows
  • Smart contract-based distribution automation

When governance logic is programmable, operational expansion does not proportionally increase administrative complexity.

Transform Your Asset Digitization Vision into Production-Ready Infrastructure

Step-by-Step Decision Framework for Enterprises

To select a white label tokenization platform, organizations need to evaluate the overall architecture, not just conduct a vendor comparison. Because both regulatory and other operational factors affect the issuance of tokenized assets, organizations must evaluate the depth of their infrastructure, as well as its compliance programmability, integration capabilities and upgrade options in order to implement properly.

Organizations must evaluate the criteria listed below when evaluating enterprise white label tokenization solutions for scalable enterprise implementations.

Step 1: Define Asset Class and Jurisdictional Scope

Before evaluating vendors, enterprises must clarify:

  • Type of asset (real estate, funds, bonds, commodities)
  • Target investor profile
  • Operating jurisdictions
  • Licensing requirements

Different assets require different compliance logic and token standards. A scalable white label tokenization platform must accommodate multi-asset issuance under varying regulatory environments.

Step 2: Evaluate Compliance and Governance Architecture

Compliance must be programmable. Enterprises should assess whether the platform supports:

Advertisement
  • KYC/AML integration
  • Investor accreditation verification
  • Transfer restrictions
  • Dividend and distribution automation
  • Voting and governance modules

The strongest white label tokenization development services integrate compliance into smart contract logic rather than treating it as a manual overlay.

Step 3: Assess Smart Contract Architecture and Security

Security is non-negotiable. Key evaluation criteria include:

  • Third-party audited smart contracts
  • Modular architecture
  • Multi-signature controls
  • Role-based administrative permissions
  • Incident response mechanisms

A credible white-label tokenization platform development company should demonstrate a strong audit history and transparent security documentation.

Step 4: Examine Integration and API Infrastructure

Tokenization does not operate in isolation. Enterprises must verify:

  • API accessibility
  • Banking and payment gateway integration
  • Custodian connectivity
  • ERP and CRM compatibility
  • Reporting and analytics dashboards

A well-structured white label tokenization software solution integrates seamlessly into existing financial infrastructure.

Step 5: Review Customization Flexibility

White-label does not mean rigid. Evaluate:

  • Branding capabilities
  • UI/UX customization
  • Token economics configuration
  • Investor portal personalization
  • Workflow modification flexibility

Customization ensures differentiation in competitive markets.

Step 6: Analyze Scalability and Performance

Infrastructure must support growth. Key technical considerations:

Advertisement
  • Transaction throughput
  • Gas optimization mechanisms
    Cloud deployment flexibility
  • Load balancing architecture
  • Disaster recovery systems

An enterprise-grade engine must support large investor volumes without performance degradation.

Must-Have Features in an Enterprise White-Label Tokenization Platform

A production-ready white label tokenization platform must go beyond basic issuance functionality and deliver infrastructure-grade capabilities aligned with regulatory compliance, security resilience, and institutional scalability. Enterprise adoption depends on how deeply the white label tokenization software embeds automation, governance logic, and interoperability within its core architecture.

  1. Multi-Asset Issuance Support – Enables structured token creation across diverse asset classes within a unified infrastructure.
  2. Configurable Compliance Engine – Embeds programmable transfer restrictions, investor eligibility rules, and jurisdictional controls directly into smart contracts.
    Role-Based Governance Management – Implements hierarchical access controls and on-chain voting mechanisms for structured decision-making.
  3. Automated Dividend and Yield Distribution – Streamlines financial payouts through smart contract-triggered settlement logic.
  4. Custodial Wallet Integration – Ensures compatibility with institutional-grade custody providers for secure asset management.
  5. Secondary Market Readiness – Supports compliant token transfers and exchange integrations to facilitate liquidity.
  6. Real-Time Reporting Dashboards – Provides synchronized on-chain and off-chain data visibility for regulatory and investor reporting.
  7. Smart Contract Upgradeability – Allows controlled protocol evolution without disrupting active tokenized assets.

Cost of a White-Label Tokenization Platform: What Enterprises Should Expect

The cost of implementing a white label tokenization platform varies significantly depending on architecture depth, compliance complexity, and customization scope. Enterprises must evaluate cost across multiple dimensions rather than focusing solely on licensing fees.

1. Platform Licensing or Base Infrastructure Cost

This includes core smart contract frameworks, admin panels, and issuance modules.

2. Customization & Integration Cost
  • UI/UX personalization
  • Custody integration
  • API development
  • Compliance configuration

Advanced white label tokenization development services increase upfront cost but reduce long-term re-engineering expenses.

3. Security & Audit Expenses

Smart contract audits, penetration testing, and compliance validation are non-negotiable for enterprise-grade deployments.

4. Infrastructure & Cloud Hosting

Costs depend on blockchain selection, transaction volume, and deployment model (public, private, or hybrid).

Advertisement
5. Ongoing Maintenance & Upgrade Costs

Includes contract updates, regulatory modifications, technical support, and feature enhancements.

Building Future-Ready Tokenization Infrastructure

Selecting the right white label tokenization platform is a long-term infrastructure decision that directly influences regulatory agility, liquidity scalability, governance automation, and ecosystem expansion. Enterprises that approach this evaluation with architectural rigor — assessing smart contract modularity, compliance depth, interoperability, and upgrade pathways — position themselves to build resilient and future-ready digital asset frameworks.

As a leading white label tokenization platform development company, Antier delivers enterprise-grade tokenization infrastructure engineered for security, configurability, and regulatory alignment. With deep expertise in blockchain architecture, compliance-driven smart contracts, and scalable deployment models, Antier empowers financial institutions, asset managers, and fintech innovators to launch and scale institutional tokenization ecosystems with confidence.

For organizations seeking a strategically aligned tokenization partner, Antier provides the expertise and infrastructure required to transform asset digitization into sustainable market advantage.

Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

01. What is a white-label tokenization engine?

A white-label tokenization engine is a customizable blockchain-based infrastructure that allows organizations to issue and manage tokenized assets under their own brand, offering faster market entry and compliance configuration.

02. Why is the choice of tokenization engine important for long-term scalability?

The choice of tokenization engine impacts long-term scalability by ensuring that the architecture supports not just transaction throughput but also regulatory elasticity, operational automation, and ecosystem interoperability.

03. What core capabilities does a white-label tokenization engine provide?

Core capabilities include token issuance and lifecycle management, compliance rule enforcement, investor onboarding and KYC integration, governance modules, smart contract management, and asset reporting dashboards.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Anthropic Hits $30 Billion Run Rate as Enterprise Demand and Compute Deals Reshape AI Race

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Anthropic’s annualized revenue jumped from $9B at end-2025 to over $30B by early April 2026, a near-vertical climb.
  • Enterprise clients spending $1M+ annually doubled from 500 to 1,000 in under two months following the Series G raise.
  • Anthropic secured multiple gigawatts of next-gen TPU capacity through a three-way deal with Google and Broadcom for 2027.
  • Claude is now the only frontier AI model available across AWS Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI, and Microsoft Azure Foundry.

Anthropic’s annualized revenue has crossed $30 billion in early April 2026, marking a dramatic acceleration from just $9 billion at the end of 2025.

The AI company has also secured a landmark compute agreement with Google and Broadcom for multiple gigawatts of next-generation TPU capacity.

Enterprise adoption of Claude has doubled in under two months. The company is now positioned as a critical infrastructure provider for some of the world’s largest corporations.

Enterprise Growth Drives Revenue Surge

Anthropic’s revenue growth has followed a nearly vertical trajectory over the past year. The company reported roughly $1 billion in annualized revenue in late 2024. That figure climbed to $9 billion by year-end 2025, then jumped to $14 billion just two months ago.

Today, the run rate stands above $30 billion before the second quarter has even begun. Earlier internal forecasts projected $18 billion for all of 2026, a target the company has already surpassed as a run rate.

When Anthropic closed its Series G round in February at a $380 billion valuation, it reported 500 business customers each spending over $1 million annually. That number has since doubled to more than 1,000 enterprise customers at the same spending threshold.

Eight of the Fortune 10 companies are currently running critical workloads on Claude. That level of penetration among the world’s most powerful corporations reflects growing institutional trust in the platform.

Advertisement

Compute Strategy Expands Across Platforms

Anthropic announced a new agreement with Google and Broadcom for multiple gigawatts of next-generation TPU capacity expected online starting in 2027. The company published a statement noting the deal represents its most substantial compute commitment to date.

Anthropic trains and runs Claude across AWS Trainium chips via Project Rainier, Google TPUs manufactured by Broadcom, and NVIDIA GPUs across multiple data centers.

Claude is currently the only frontier AI model available on all three of the largest cloud platforms — Amazon Web Services Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI, and Microsoft Azure Foundry.

This multi-chip approach allows Anthropic to match workloads to the most suitable hardware, reducing bottlenecks and improving resilience. The strategy also protects against supply chain disruptions that have affected other AI providers.

Advertisement

Back in December, Broadcom’s CEO revealed that a mystery customer had placed a $10 billion custom chip order, later disclosed to be Anthropic.

That was followed almost immediately by another $11 billion order in the same quarter. Broadcom CEO Hock Tan has since projected close to $100 billion in AI chip revenue for 2027, with Anthropic cited as a primary driver.

Anthropic’s internal forecast for 2027 had called for $55 billion in annual revenue. Given the current growth rate, that projection no longer appears far-fetched.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin steadies above $68K as Iran tensions keep markets on edge

Published

on

A bearish Bitcoin PA
A bearish Bitcoin PA

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin is holding near $69K as Iran-related geopolitical tensions keep markets cautious.
  • Rising oil prices and inflation concerns are limiting upside, but strong ETF inflows and institutional support are helping BTC stay resilient.

Bitcoin is trading sideways near the $69,000 mark as investors remain cautious amid escalating geopolitical tensions tied to the conflict in Iran.

The leading cryptocurrency briefly pushed above $70,000 on Monday—its first move past that level since March—but failed to sustain momentum. 

Geopolitics dominate market sentiment

The ongoing situation in Iran continues to shape global risk appetite. U.S. President Donald Trump has warned of severe consequences if a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz is not reached by the Tuesday 20:00 ET deadline.

Iran has rejected a proposed 45-day ceasefire, instead calling for a permanent end to hostilities alongside the removal of sanctions.

Advertisement

For Bitcoin, this macro backdrop is significant—higher oil prices tend to support inflation, push Treasury yields higher, and reinforce expectations that the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates elevated for longer.

Despite the current situation, Bitcoin has held up better than some traditional markets. While it has not staged a breakout, its ability to maintain levels above $65,000 suggests underlying support from positioning and institutional demand.

Meanwhile, Gold has lost more than 10% of its value as investors scale back expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts this year.

Flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs have been a key factor. After four consecutive months of outflows, March saw $1.2 billion in net inflows. Momentum has continued into April, with spot ETFs recording $471.3 million in inflows in a single day—the largest since February.

Advertisement

These inflows have helped keep Bitcoin’s price, although resistance near $76,000 continues to cap upside.

For Bitcoin to break higher, a clear catalyst is likely required. A confirmed ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran could be pivotal, particularly if it drives oil prices below $100 per barrel and alleviates inflation concerns.

Technical forecast: Bitcoin eyes the $70k resistance once again

The BTC/USD 4-hour chart remains bearish and efficient as Bitcoin continues to defend the $65,000 support level. 

The price has recovered from this low and is testing resistance around 69k, the 50-day EMA, and the lower band of the rising channel. 

Advertisement

The RSI of 61 on the 4-hour chart is above the neutral level, indicating a growing bullish bias. The MACD lines are also above the zero line, adding further confluence to the bullish narrative. 

Buyers will need to rise above $69,000 to bring $74,000 into focus, the mid-point of the rising channel and the falling trendline resistance dating back to October’s $126,000 record high. 

BTC/USD 4H Chart

A surge above the $74,000 resistance level would allow BTC to test the March high of $76,000 in the near term. 

However, failure to rally higher would see the bears push the price towards the $65,000 support level once again.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Captures $119M as Digital Asset Funds Post $224M Weekly Inflows

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Highlights

  • XRP attracts record $119M, dominating weekly digital asset investment flows

  • Ethereum suffers continued decline with $52M withdrawal amid policy concerns

  • Bitcoin records $107M inflows while bearish positioning expands significantly

  • Swiss markets dominate global flows as American investor appetite weakens

  • Economic data triggers late-week reversal in cryptocurrency investment momentum

Cryptocurrency investment products attracted $224 million in fresh capital over the past week, representing a short-lived bounce following previous withdrawals. However, macroeconomic headwinds dampened enthusiasm as the week concluded. XRP emerged as the clear winner while Ethereum’s outflow streak extended.

XRP Commands Investment Flows with Record Weekly Performance

[[LINK_START_0]]XRP[[LINK_END_0]] captured the lion’s share of investment activity, pulling in $119.6 million during the week. This represented the digital asset’s most impressive showing since late December 2025. The momentum persisted even as broader cryptocurrency markets displayed vulnerability. Year-to-date, XRP has accumulated $159 million in net inflows.

The impressive performance followed sustained investor interest after the introduction of spot XRP exchange-traded products in American markets. These investment vehicles enhanced accessibility and facilitated continuous capital movement into the asset. Consequently, XRP now represents approximately seven percent of aggregate assets managed across cryptocurrency funds.

European financial centers played a significant role in driving XRP’s success. Switzerland emerged as the top contributor with more than $157 million in capital inflows, while Germany and Canada also participated strongly. This geographic distribution indicated evolving capital deployment strategies across international cryptocurrency markets.

Advertisement

Bitcoin Displays Conflicting Trends as Investor Sentiment Splits

Bitcoin attracted $107.3 million in new investments, demonstrating modest revival following earlier capital withdrawals. However, monthly performance remained in negative territory, with cumulative outflows reaching $145 million. This divergence underscored persistent indecision regarding the asset’s trajectory.

Inverse bitcoin products drew $16 million in capital, revealing heightened pessimistic positioning among certain market participants. Simultaneously, American spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds contributed minimally to overall flows. These contradictory indicators exposed a fundamental divide in investor outlook.

Meanwhile, Solana accumulated $34.9 million in inflows, extending its positive momentum throughout the current year. Its aggregate inflows now constitute roughly ten percent of total managed assets. This reliable performance reinforced broader portfolio diversification trends within digital asset investment products.

Ethereum Suffers Substantial Withdrawals Amid Legislative Uncertainty

Ethereum maintained its negative trajectory, experiencing $52.8 million in weekly capital flight. This followed an even larger $222 million exodus the preceding week. The asset’s year-to-date outflows have now reached $327 million.

Advertisement

Legislative ambiguity surrounding the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act continued exerting downward pressure on Ethereum-focused investment vehicles. The proposed legislation remained gridlocked in the Senate due to disputes regarding stablecoin yield components. This impasse negatively impacted sentiment toward Ethereum’s ecosystem positioning.

Ethereum’s fundamental importance to stablecoin infrastructure heightened its vulnerability to regulatory developments. This strategic exposure amplified pressure on capital movements during periods of policy ambiguity. Ethereum stood out as the poorest performer among leading cryptocurrency assets.

Broader economic conditions also shaped overall investment product activity throughout the period. Robust American retail sales figures reinforced projections of continued restrictive monetary policy. This evolution diminished risk tolerance and prompted modest withdrawals as the week closed.

Simultaneously, rising crude oil valuations and receding interest rate reduction expectations intensified market headwinds. These dynamics interrupted early-week positive momentum across digital asset investment vehicles. Ultimately, the weekly recovery proved incomplete and varied substantially across geographic regions and individual assets.

Advertisement

 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

DATs Need Liquid Staking to Outperform ETH Staking ETFs: Lido Exec

Published

on

DATs Need Liquid Staking to Outperform ETH Staking ETFs: Lido Exec

Ether treasury companies may need to use liquid staking and other active yield strategies if they want to offer investors something beyond the staking rewards already available through listed Ether products, Kean Gilbert, head of institutional relations at Lido, told Cointelegraph at ETHCC 2026.

Liquid staking lets Ether (ETH) holders stake their tokens while receiving a transferable token that can still be deployed elsewhere in decentralized finance (DeFi).

Gilbert said strategies such as posting ETH as collateral and borrowing against it could help treasury companies generate higher returns than passive staking products.

US-listed staked ETH products now include the REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF, launched in September 2025, Grayscale’s Ethereum Staking ETF and Ethereum Staking Mini ETF, and BlackRock’s iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF, introduced on March 12.

Advertisement

Issuer disclosures show different staking economics across Ether products, making direct yield comparisons difficult. Grayscale’s ETHE page showed 2.26% net staking rewards as of April 6, while Grayscale’s ETH page showed 2.56% as of April 2. Native ETH staking was yielding about 2.72% annually, according to Staking Rewards.

Related: Bitmine paper loss nears $8.8B as Ether slump tests cyclical thesis

Still, Jimmy Xue, co-founder and chief operating officer of quantitative yield platform Axis, said Ether treasury companies do not necessarily need to beat staked Ether products on headline yield because they are different investment vehicles.

“A staked ETH ETF is a passive vehicle. A DAT trading at a meaningful mNAV premium is promising something a passive ETF structurally cannot deliver, which is active, dynamic deployment of spot inventory across opportunities as they arise.”

“The mNAV premium investors pay reflects confidence in management’s ability to put that treasury to work,” Xue said, adding that basis trading is a major yield source for treasury companies.

Advertisement
Kean Gilbert, head of institutional relations at Lido Finance, interviewed by Cointelegraph at ETHcc. Source: Cointelegraph

Public filings show liquid staking adoption

Public disclosures show several Ether treasury firms using staking or liquid-staking-related strategies, though the level of detail varies by company.

Sharplink Gaming, the second-largest corporate Ether holder, has generated 14,516 ETH (around $30.8 million) in staking rewards as of March. It derived 33% of these rewards from liquid staking and 66% from native staking, according to a March 1 filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Sharplink reported a $734 million net loss for 2025, largely driven by the sharp crypto market downturn in the second half of the year.

BTCS Inc. SEC filing. Source: SEC.gov

BTCS Inc., the 10th-largest Ether treasury company by returns, has also staked a part of its Ether holdings through the liquid staking protocol Rocket Pool. Out of its total 29,122 ETH holdings, the company has liquid staked 4,160 ETH ($8.8 million) through Rocket Pool nodes, according to a July 2025 SEC filing.

Cointelegraph has approached BitMine, SharpLink and The Ether Machine for comment on the role of liquid staking in their strategies.

Advertisement

Magazine: Sharplink exec shocked by level of BTC and ETH ETF hodling — Joseph Chalom