Crypto World
Wintermute adds tokenized gold to institutional OTC desk
Wintermute has rolled out institutional over-the-counter trading for tokenized gold, marking its entry into digital commodities amid rising interest in asset-backed tokens.
Summary
- Wintermute added tokenized gold to its OTC desk.
- Institutions can now trade and settle gold tokens on-chain.
- The market is forecast to reach $15 billion by 2026.
The firm said on Feb. 16 that its OTC desk now supports trading in Pax Gold and Tether Gold, the two largest gold-backed tokens by market value.
The service gives professional investors a way to gain exposure to physical gold through blockchain-based products, while keeping access to crypto-style settlement and liquidity. It comes in response to the increasing demand from institutions for transparent, stable assets that are easy to trade and settle fast.
Building on-chain access to gold markets
Wintermute will offer institutional clients algorithmically optimized spot execution as part of the new launch. Clients can settle trades in the way that suits them best. Transactions can be completed on-chain using major cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, or traditional fiat currencies.
This setup allows positions to be opened, adjusted, or closed instantly. It also helps move capital smoothly between markets while lowering settlement risk. For trading firms and investment funds, this structure makes it easier to manage liquidity and hedge exposure.
Instead of sticking to traditional choices like exchange-traded funds or buying physical gold bars and coins, more investors are starting to look at tokenized gold. These digital tokens are backed by real gold and allow investors to buy small fractions of it, making gold ownership more accessible.
They can also be traded easily, giving holders flexibility without the hassle of storing or transporting physical gold. That level of flexibility is hard to achieve in conventional markets.
Industry data shows that the total value of tokenized gold surged to around $5.4 billion by mid-February 2026, an increase of about 80% in just three months.
Growth outlook and institutional interest
Wintermute chief executive Evgeny Gaevoy said the tokenized gold market could reach $15 billion by the end of 2026, nearly three times its current size. He pointed to rising institutional participation and demand for asset-backed digital products as key factors behind the forecast.
Trading volumes have also increased. During the fourth quarter of 2025, tokenized gold products recorded over $126 billion in turnover, outpacing several major gold ETFs.
According to analysts, 24-hour trading and more transparent pricing are the main factors driving the growth. Prices are shown in real time, and investors are free to buy and sell whenever they want.
Despite the recent crypto market downturn, tokenized gold has remained popular among investors seeking stability and portfolio diversification. Wintermute’s most recent launch indicates a larger trend in the industry toward more reputable, institution-focused services.
Bitcoin added downside BTC price warnings as Binance order-book data showed multiple investor classes selling coins into the weekend.
Bitcoin (BTC) circled $67,000 on Sunday as traders warned of hidden BTC price weakness.
Key points:
-
Bitcoin Bollinger Bands demand a volatile BTC price breakout after a slow weekend.
-
A trader predicts a move lower thanks to weak support and exposed downside wicks.
-
Sideways price action comes as sellers step up into the end of the week.
Bitcoin trader waits for sweep of sub-$60,000 lows
Data from TradingView showed volatility cooling over the weekend, with BTC/USD acting within an increasingly narrow range.
On four-hour time frames, the Bollinger Bands volatility indicator constricted — a classic signal that a sharp move up or down was due.
In their latest analysis, pseudonymous trader LP bet on bears winning the battle.
“Looking back at previous cycles, bottoms were formed after multiple sweeps of the lows, forcing capitulation before a reversal,” a post on X read.
“In contrast, this cycle has been doing the opposite, consistently sweeping the highs, making it difficult to enter short positions while leaving the lows exposed and building liquidity below.”
LP said that sweeping local lows, including February’s wick below $60,000, was “likely just a matter of time.”
“When that breakdown eventually happens, watch the behavior closely. If price starts repeatedly sweeping the lows, making it psychologically difficult to enter longs, that’s when a true bottom is more likely forming,” they concluded.
Whales “buying dips and selling rips” on BTC
Continuing, Keith Alan, cofounder of trading resource Material Indicators, flagged unusual selling activity despite flat BTC price action.
Related: Bitcoin ‘done’ with 85% crashes, says Cathie Wood amid new $34K target
Uploading a chart of Binance order-book liquidity and volume by investor class, Alan highlighted a bot using time-weighted average price (TWAP) to distribute BTC on Friday.
“The vertical orange line represents the smallest order class with a TWAP bot selling $18M in an hour,” he explained.
“That’s exponentially more than their normal $3M-$5M daily volume in 1 hr. That ain’t retail!”
Whales, Alan added, were “buying dips and selling rips” with Bitcoin still trapped in a range.
Earlier, Cointelegraph reported on further threats to Bitcoin bulls, including resurgent US dollar strength.
This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investments and trades carry risk; readers are encouraged to conduct independent research before making any decisions. Cointelegraph makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information presented, including forward-looking statements, and will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this content.
Bitcoin (BTC) traded near $66,749 at press time, while market activity stayed muted across major digital assets.
Summary
- Bitcoin traded near $66,749 as low volatility and weak liquidity kept traders watching for moves.
- Analyst Michaël van de Poppe said Bitcoin may sweep liquidity before a fast recovery upward.
- EGRAG CRYPTO said past Bitcoin cycle bottoms often reached the 1.618 Fibonacci zone before rebounding.
The asset was down slightly in the past 24 hours, while seven-day gains stood at 0.81%. Daily trading volume reached $19.67 billion.
That price action came during a period of weak movement in the market. Analysts tracked a narrow range in Bitcoin and pointed to low activity across the wider crypto sector. Altcoins also showed soft volume and thinner liquidity during the same period.
Analysts track a possible end to the squeeze
Crypto analyst Michaël van de Poppe said volatility on Bitcoin’s four-hour chart had dropped to its lowest level since the broader breakdown. He said the market was nearing the end of a volatility squeeze that usually does not last much longer under similar conditions.
Van de Poppe also said altcoins showed the same pattern, with low volatility, low volume, and low liquidity. Despite the geopolitical backdrop, he wrote that he would not expect a much deeper move lower and instead saw a possible liquidity sweep followed by a quick recovery, “most likely during next week already.”
Crypto market commentator EGRAG CRYPTO pointed to longer-term chart structure. He said past Bitcoin cycle bottoms repeatedly reached the 1.618 Fibonacci level before the market formed a base.
He described that level as an area where fear often peaks and accumulation starts. The post framed that view as a structure-based reading rather than a reaction to short-term headlines. The account also urged traders to focus on charts and numbers instead of outside narratives.
At the same time, traders watched new posts from The Kobeissi Letter about comments attributed to Donald Trump on Iran and the Strait of Hormuz.
The account also said Trump planned a news conference with the US military at 1 PM ET on Monday. Those headlines added another layer of caution for crypto traders.
Rich Dad Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki has argued that the economic shifts set in motion more than five decades ago are now unfolding, advocating for Bitcoin and gold while warning against rising debt, inflation and retirement risks.
In a Saturday post on X, Kiyosaki pointed to 1974 as a turning point that reshaped both money and retirement systems. He argued that the United States’ move toward a petrodollar framework, alongside policy changes affecting pensions, laid the foundation for today’s financial pressures.
“The future created in 1974 has arrived,” Kiyosaki wrote, linking current inflation and geopolitical tensions around energy to the dollar’s evolution after the end of the gold standard era. He also mentioned the passage of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which introduced new rules for pension plans and coincided with a broader shift toward market-based retirement savings.
According to Kiyosaki, that transition replaced guaranteed lifetime income for many workers with systems such as 401(k)s and similar accounts, placing more risk on individuals. “Millions of baby-boomers will soon find out they have no income once they stop working,” he warned.
Related: Rich Bitcoin traders lost $337M daily in first quarter of 2026
Kiyosaki supports Bitcoin, gold as “real money”
Kiyosaki reiterated his long-standing view that individuals should focus on financial education and consider alternative stores of value. He said he continues to favor assets such as gold, silver and Bitcoin, which he describes as “real money.”
Last month, Kiyosaki warned that a major financial “bubble burst” could be approaching, arguing that such a crisis may trigger a sharp rally in scarce assets like Bitcoin (BTC). He suggested Bitcoin could reach $750,000 within a year of the crash.
His view is tied to the expansion of global money supply, which historically has driven demand for limited assets. During the 2020–2021 period, rising liquidity coincided with strong gains in stocks and real estate. Kiyosaki expects a similar dynamic after a downturn, also forecasting that gold could surge significantly.
Related: ‘Rich Dad, Poor Dad’ author says ‘pin is near’ on TradFi ‘bubble burst:’ Predicts $750K Bitcoin
Bitcoin bearish sentiment spikes
Meanwhile, bearish sentiment around Bitcoin has climbed to its highest level since late February, according to data from crypto analytics platform Santiment. The ratio of bullish to bearish comments across major social platforms has dropped to 0.81, reflecting a noticeable lack of optimism among market participants.
Despite the negative tone, Santiment suggested this could be a contrarian signal. Historically, markets tend to move against crowd expectations, meaning elevated fear and uncertainty may precede a price recovery.
Magazine: Bitcoin 85% crashes ‘done,’ CLARITY Act speculation mounts: Hodler’s Digest, Mar. 29 – April 4
TLDR:
- Every crypto cycle since 2017 has produced one dominant chain or narrative that rewarded early participants.
- The 2022 collapse of LUNA and FTX proved that capital preservation matters more than chasing the hottest trend.
- By 2025, nations began stacking Bitcoin as a reserve asset, shifting the buyer profile beyond retail investors.
- Entering 2026 with no clear winner yet, history points to a new season forming before most participants notice it.
Each crypto market cycle has produced a clear winner — until the next one arrived. Observers tracking blockchain trends over the past decade have noted a recurring pattern: capital, attention, and momentum rotate between chains and narratives.
Understanding these cycles has separated profitable participants from those who stayed focused on yesterday’s opportunities. The question entering 2026 is which season comes next.
Bitcoin and Ethereum Set the Foundation for Rotating Chain Dominance
Crypto market cycles began taking shape as early as 2017, when Bitcoin led the charge. Retail investors who simply held BTC through that period came out ahead.
The following year, Ethereum captured that momentum through the ICO boom, making it the dominant chain of 2018.
The bear market of 2019 offered a different kind of lesson. Bitcoin moved from $3,400 to $13,000 and back within a single year. Altcoins largely sat out. Surviving that period came down to patience and conviction rather than active trading.
Then 2020 introduced DeFi, and Ethereum rewarded on-chain participants generously. Protocols like YFI, AAVE, and UNI generated returns that traditional markets could not match.
Solana followed in 2021, establishing itself as a credible alternative to Ethereum and running hard across the board.
As analyst Jeremy noted on X, “Every chain has its season. Most people only notice after it’s over.” That observation holds true across each of these periods. The rotation was visible in hindsight, though rarely obvious in real time.
2022 Through 2026 Reflects the Shift Toward Institutional and National Narratives
The 2022 cycle stands apart from the rest. No single chain won. LUNA collapsed by May, and FTX followed in November.
The market rewarded caution over speculation that year. Those who avoided both disasters preserved enough capital to participate in the next cycle.
Bitcoin reasserted itself in 2023, quietly. Ordinals introduced a new use case directly on the Bitcoin base layer. Meanwhile, the ETF approval narrative built steadily while much of the market was still recovering from 2022.
Solana returned in 2024, this time through meme coins. The Pump.fun platform became the symbol of that era. Jeremy cited one trader who turned $72,000 into $30 million within three days on a meme coin. That kind of return drew a new wave of participants to the Solana ecosystem.
By 2025, the narrative moved beyond retail entirely. Nations began accumulating Bitcoin as a reserve asset. That shift in buyer profile changed the dynamics of the market in a way that previous cycles had not seen.
Entering 2026, no dominant chain or narrative has emerged yet. According to Jeremy, “The next season is loading.” Those positioned ahead of the cycle stand to benefit most.
A six-month intelligence operation preceded the $270 million exploit of Drift Protocol and was carried out by a North Korean state-affiliated group, according to a detailed incident update published by the team earlier on Sunday.
The attackers first made contact around fall 2025 at a major crypto conference, presenting themselves as a quantitative trading firm looking to integrate with Drift.
They were technically fluent, had verifiable professional backgrounds, and understood how the protocol operated, Drift said. A Telegram group was established and what followed were months of substantive conversations around trading strategies and vault integrations, interactions that are standard for how trading firms onboard with DeFi protocols.
Between December 2025 and January 2026, the group onboarded an Ecosystem Vault on Drift, held multiple working sessions with contributors, deposited over $1 million of their own capital, and built a functioning operational presence inside the ecosystem.
Drift contributors met individuals from the group face to face at multiple major industry conferences across several countries through February and March. By the time the attack launched on April 1, the relationship was nearly half a year old.
The compromise appears to have come through two vectors.
A second downloaded a TestFlight application, Apple’s platform for distributing pre-release apps that bypasses App Store security review, which the group presented as their wallet product.
For the repository vector, Drift pointed to a known vulnerability in VSCode and Cursor, two of the most widely used code editors in software development, that the security community had been flagging since late 2025, where simply opening a file or folder in the editor was sufficient to silently execute arbitrary code with no prompt or warning of any kind.
Once devices were compromised, the attackers had what they needed to obtain the two multisig approvals that enabled the durable nonce attack CoinDesk detailed earlier this week. Those pre-signed transactions sat dormant for more than a week before being executed on April 1, draining $270 million from the protocol’s vaults in under a minute.
The attribution points to UNC4736, a North Korean state-affiliated group also tracked as AppleJeus or Citrine Sleet, based on both on-chain fund flows tracing back to the Radiant Capital attackers and operational overlap with known DPRK-linked personas.
The individuals who appeared in person at conferences were not North Korean nationals, however. DPRK threat actors at this level are known to deploy third-party intermediaries with fully constructed identities, employment histories, and professional networks built to withstand due diligence.
Drift urged other protocols to audit access controls and treat every device touching a multisig as a potential target. The broader implication is uncomfortable for an industry that relies on multisig governance as its primary security model.
But if attackers are willing to spend six months and a million dollars building a legitimate presence inside an ecosystem, meet teams in person, contribute real capital, and wait, the question is what security model is designed to catch that.
TLDR:
- Attackers minted 80M USR tokens illegally by hijacking Resolv’s off-chain signing infrastructure on March 22, 2026.
- A compromised contractor’s GitHub credential from a third-party project served as the initial entry point into Resolv’s systems.
- Around 46M of the illicitly minted USR was neutralized through direct burns and blacklist deployment after a timelock period.
- Resolv is now introducing on-chain mint caps, OIDC-based authentication, and automated pause mechanisms to prevent future breaches.
Resolv Protocol fell victim to a sophisticated cyberattack on March 22, 2026, resulting in a $25 million loss. Attackers exploited off-chain signing infrastructure to mint 80 million USR tokens without proper authorization.
The breach unfolded across multiple organizations and infrastructure layers. Resolv has since contained the attack, revoked all compromised credentials, and paused most protocol operations.
Pre-hack USR holders are being compensated on a 1:1 basis, with most redemptions already processed.
How Attackers Moved From a Third-Party Breach Into Resolv’s Core Systems
The attack began outside Resolv’s own infrastructure entirely. A contractor had previously contributed to a third-party project that was separately compromised.
The attackers obtained a GitHub credential linked to that contractor’s account. That single credential opened a door into Resolv’s code repositories.
Once inside, the attackers deployed a malicious GitHub workflow. This workflow quietly extracted sensitive infrastructure credentials without triggering outbound network detection.
Resolv confirmed in its postmortem that the attackers “removed their own access from the repository to minimize their forensic footprint” after pulling those credentials.
The extracted credentials then gave them entry into Resolv’s cloud environment. Over several days, the attackers conducted quiet reconnaissance, mapping services and probing for API keys tied to third-party integrations. They worked methodically before moving toward execution.
Gaining signing authority over the minting key was not straightforward. Multiple escalation attempts failed due to existing access controls.
As Resolv’s postmortem noted, the attackers ultimately used “a higher-privileged role’s policy management capabilities to modify the key’s access policy directly, granting themselves signing authority.”
How the Protocol Responded and What Changes Are Now Underway
Real-time monitoring flagged the first anomalous transaction within approximately one hour of the initial mint. The team then began preparing to pause contracts, halt backend services, and revoke compromised credentials. At 05:16 UTC, all relevant smart contracts with pause functionality were fully paused on-chain.
By 05:30 UTC, revoked credentials had severed the attackers’ cloud access entirely. Resolv noted that “forensic logs confirm that the attackers had been active as recently as 05:15 UTC,” meaning containment happened while the threat was still live. Around 46 million of the 80 million illicitly minted USR has since been neutralized through burns and blacklisting.
Resolv engaged several external firms to assist with recovery. These include Hexens for infrastructure forensics, MixBytes for smart contract audit, SEAL 911 for emergency coordination, and Hypernative for real-time monitoring. Mandiant and ZeroShadow are also set to join the broader investigation.
Going forward, Resolv plans to replace CI/CD credentials with OIDC-based authentication. The team stated it is “implementing on-chain mint caps and oracle-based price validation for minting operations” as part of its remediation plan.
Automated emergency pause mechanisms connected to live monitoring are also in development to prevent similar delays in future incident response.
Michael Saylor said Bitcoin no longer follows the traditional four-year cycle tied to halving events. He said the market has moved into a new phase where capital flows and credit now shape price direction.
Summary
- Michael Saylor said Bitcoin no longer follows the four-year halving cycle seen in prior markets.
- He said capital flows, bank credit, and institutional adoption now drive Bitcoin’s long-term price path.
- Adam Livingston said MicroStrategy built a lead that rivals may struggle to match in Bitcoin.
Michael Saylor said the old pattern linked to Bitcoin halving events is no longer the main market driver. He stated that the traditional four-year cycle is “dead” as Bitcoin takes on a different role in global finance.
For years, many traders linked Bitcoin’s price moves to halving events that cut miner rewards. Those events were widely seen as a major reason for recurring boom-and-bust phases in the market. Saylor now argues that this structure no longer defines Bitcoin’s path.
Capital flows now lead Bitcoin price action
Saylor said Bitcoin’s next phase depends more on how money enters the asset through institutions and credit systems. He wrote that “price is now driven by capital flows” and added that bank and digital credit will shape Bitcoin’s growth path.
That view shifts focus away from supply shock alone. It places more attention on broader financial access, including how banks, funds, and large firms use Bitcoin as part of treasury and reserve strategies.
Saylor’s remarks came as large firms continue to build products and services around Bitcoin. That trend has changed how many market participants view the asset, especially as regulated access has expanded through financial platforms.
He said Bitcoin has changed its place on the world stage. In his view, adoption by traditional finance now carries more weight than past cycle models built around miner reward cuts.
MicroStrategy strategy remains part of the debate
The discussion also returned to MicroStrategy’s large Bitcoin holdings. Market commentator Adam Livingston said Saylor and MicroStrategy have effectively “won the game” of institutional Bitcoin adoption through early and aggressive accumulation.
That claim reflects the company’s large position and its long-running Bitcoin treasury model.
At the same time, Saylor’s latest comments add to a wider market debate over whether Bitcoin now trades more on institutional demand than on its historic halving cycle pattern.
Drift Protocol (DRIFT) published a detailed incident update on April 5, revealing that the $285 million exploit on April 1 was the result of a six-month intelligence operation attributed to North Korean state-backed actors.
The disclosure describes a level of social engineering that goes well beyond typical phishing or recruiter scams, involving in-person meetings, real capital deployment, and months of trust-building.
A Fake Trading Firm That Played the Long Game
According to Drift, a group posing as a quantitative trading firm first approached contributors at a major crypto conference in fall 2025.
Over the following months, these individuals appeared at multiple events across several countries, held working sessions, and maintained ongoing Telegram conversations about vault integrations.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Between December 2025 and January 2026, the group onboarded an Ecosystem Vault on Drift, deposited over $1 million in capital, and participated in detailed product discussions.
By March, Drift contributors had met these individuals face-to-face on multiple occasions.
“…the most dangerous hackers don’t look like hackers,” commented crypto developer Gautham.
Even Web security experts find this concerning, with researcher Tay sharing that she initially expected a typical recruiter scam but found the operation’s depth far more alarming.
How the Devices Were Compromised
Drift identified three likely attack vectors:
- One contributor cloned a code repository the group shared for a vault frontend.
- A second downloaded a TestFlight application presented as a wallet product.
- For the repository vector, Drift pointed to a known VSCode and Cursor vulnerability that security researchers had been flagging since late 2025.
That flaw allowed arbitrary code to execute silently the moment a file or folder was opened in the editor, with no user interaction required.
After the April 1 drain, the attackers scrubbed all Telegram chats and malicious software. Drift has since frozen remaining protocol functions and removed compromised wallets from the multisig.
The SEALS 911 team assessed with medium-high confidence that the same threat actors carried out the October 2024 Radiant Capital hack, which Mandiant attributed to UNC4736.
On-chain fund flows and operational overlaps between the two campaigns support that connection.
Industry Calls for a Security Reset
Armani Ferrante, a prominent Solana developer, called on every crypto team to pause growth efforts and audit their entire security stack.
“Every team in crypto should use this as an opportunity to slow down and focus on security. If possible, dedicate an entire team to it… you can’t grow if you’re hacked,” said Ferrante.
Drift noted that the individuals who appeared in person were not North Korean nationals. DPRK threat actors at this level are known to deploy third-party intermediaries for face-to-face engagement.
Mandiant, which Drift has engaged for device forensics, has not yet formally attributed the exploit.
The disclosure serves as a warning to the broader ecosystem. Drift urged teams to audit access controls, treat every device that touches a multisig as a potential target, and contact SEAL 911 if they suspect similar targeting.
The post Drift Protocol’s $285 Million Heist Started With a Handshake and 6 Months of Trust appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Algorand Hits Regulatory and Quantum Milestones as Institutional Adoption Accelerates in 2026
TLDR:
- The US SEC and CFTC jointly classified $ALGO as a digital commodity, removing long-standing institutional barriers in 2026.
- Google’s Quantum AI team cited Algorand 32 times in a whitepaper, recognizing its post-quantum cryptography as industry-leading.
- Algorand and Algorand Technologies merged into one Delaware entity, backed by a $15 million protocol development commitment.
- Staking launched on Revolut for 70 million users as Post Finance added $ALGO custody, marking major mainstream access milestones.
Algorand is gaining renewed attention from institutions and regulators in 2026. The blockchain network, founded by Turing Award winner Silvio Micali, has recorded several major milestones in recent months.
These include regulatory guidance from US agencies, a Google quantum endorsement, and a major organizational overhaul.
Together, these developments are drawing fresh interest from banks, governments, and enterprise builders worldwide. The network has processed over 3.5 billion on-chain transactions with zero downtime since launch.
Regulatory Clarity and Quantum Recognition Open New Doors
In March and early April 2026, the US SEC and CFTC issued joint guidance classifying $ALGO as a digital commodity. This removed a major compliance barrier that had held back institutional investors for years.
Algorand Foundation CEO Staci Warden described the decision as “bedrock regulatory clarity.” Crypto analyst account @We_R_Crypto noted this language “resonates deeply in boardrooms wary of compliance risk.”
The classification aligns $ALGO with asset classes traditional finance already understands well. As a result, institutional capital that previously held back can now move more freely into the ecosystem.
Around the same time, the Foundation and Algorand Technologies merged into a single Delaware-based entity. The consolidation brought a new Board of Directors and a $15 million commitment to protocol development.
New appointments further strengthened the organization’s technical bench. Bruno Martins was named Chief Technology Officer, while Chris Peikert joined as Chief Scientific Officer. These hires reflect a clear focus on enterprise performance and long-term cryptographic security.
On March 31, Google’s Quantum AI team published a whitepaper citing the network 32 times. The paper positioned it as a leading real-world deployment of post-quantum cryptography.
Lattice-based cryptographic techniques used by the protocol address growing concerns about quantum threats to existing standards. The market responded with strong price momentum following the whitepaper’s publication.
Institutional Partnerships and Real-World Utility Drive Adoption
Algorand’s accessibility expanded when staking went live on Revolut in early 2026. The platform serves over 70 million customers globally.
Through this integration, users can now participate in network security and earn rewards. Swiss institution Post Finance also added $ALGO trading and custody services for its clients.
Beyond staking, the network is building momentum in real-world asset tokenization. Its low fees and efficient settlement infrastructure suit fractional ownership and programmable compliance applications. These use cases align naturally with where Algorand’s infrastructure is currently positioned.
The x402 standard for agentic commerce represents another frontier. Demonstrated live at SXSW, x402 enables autonomous agents to transact directly on-chain.
This opens doors for AI-driven payment models and automated subscription services. Humanitarian use cases, including cross-border aid distribution with UNHCR, further demonstrate the network’s real-world reach.
On the education side, the Algo_Bharat initiative has established 100 blockchain clubs at Indian universities. This effort builds a developer pipeline in one of the world’s fastest-growing digital economies.
The xGov programme complements this by funding community builders through transparent, retroactive grants.
Bitcoin is trading at $67,100 on Sunday, roughly flat over the weekend, but the mood around it is the worst it has been since the Iran conflict began on February 28.
Santiment data published Saturday shows social media commentary on bitcoin has hit a ratio of five bearish posts for every four bullish ones, the most negative skew in five weeks. The last time sentiment was this one-sided was the day Operation Epic Fury launched and bitcoin dropped below $65,000 for the first time in the conflict.
🗣️ According to social data across X, Reddit, Telegram, and other platforms, Bitcoin is seeing the highest ratio of bearish discussions (fear) since February 28th. With crypto’s #1 market cap sitting at $66.8K, FUD has crept back in with the community showing a key lack of… pic.twitter.com/Ym7SbUC22I
— Santiment ✈️ 🇫🇷 EthCC (@santimentfeed) April 4, 2026
The Fear and Greed Index sits at 9, deep in extreme fear territory, where it has been pinned between 8 and 14 for over a month. That kind of sustained single-digit reading without a corresponding price collapse is unusual. In 2022, the index hit comparable levels during the LUNA crash and the FTX implosion, both of which involved actual capitulation events with 20% to 30% single-day drawdowns. This time, bitcoin is grinding sideways in a $65,000 to $73,000 range while sentiment collapses around it.
What matters is that sentiment and price are telling completely different stories. Bitcoin has spent five weeks absorbing war headlines, Trump speeches, $403 million liquidation events, and the most bearish on-chain demand data in years without actually going anywhere. It is still trading within 5% of where it was when the conflict started, grinding sideways while the mood around it collapses.
The reason it hasn’t broken lower is visible in the institutional flow data. ETFs absorbed approximately 50,000 BTC in March, the highest monthly pace since October 2025. Strategy added another 44,000 BTC. Morgan Stanley received approval for a bitcoin ETF at 14 basis points, opening 16,000 advisors and $6.2 trillion in assets under management. The institutional bid is real and it is holding the floor.
But the floor is all it is holding. A CoinDesk analysis from early Saturday showed overall 30-day apparent demand at negative 63,000 BTC, meaning the rest of the market is selling faster than institutions can absorb. Whales holding 1,000 to 10,000 BTC have swung from adding 200,000 BTC a year ago to removing 188,000 today, one of the most aggressive distribution cycles on record.
April has historically been one of bitcoin’s strongest months, finishing green 10 out of 15 years with an average gain of 20.9%. But seasonality does not trade against a war, a negative Coinbase Premium, record whale distribution, and a Fear and Greed Index stuck in single digits.
Saudi Arabia stocks higher at close of trade; Tadawul All Share up 0.03%
Bitcoin Prepping New Lows, Trader Warns as Bollinger Bands Tighten
Tom Hanks’ Near-Perfect Space Thriller Rockets Up the Streaming Charts After NASA Launch
-
NewsBeat3 days agoSteven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Business3 days agoNo Jackpot Winner and $194 Million Prize Rolls Over
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Spanx – Corporette.com
-
Entertainment6 days ago
Fans slam 'heartbreaking' Barbie Dream Fest convention debacle with 'cardboard cutout' experience
-
Crypto World4 days agoGold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock
-
Tech6 days agoThe Pixel 10a doesn’t have a camera bump, and it’s great
-
Crypto World5 days ago
Dems press CFTC, ethics board on prediction-market insider trades
-
Tech6 days agoAvatar Legends: The Fighting Game comes out in July and it looks pretty slick
-
Business3 days agoLogin and Checkout Issues Spark Merchant Frustration
-
Sports16 hours agoIndia men’s 4x400m and mixed 4x100m relay teams register big progress | Other Sports News
-
Tech6 days agoApple will hide your email address from apps and websites, but not cops
-
Sports5 days agoTallest college basketball player ever, standing at 7-foot-9, entering transfer portal
-
Tech5 days agoEE TV is using AI to help you find something to watch
-
Politics6 days agoShould Trump Be Scared Strait?
-
Tech5 days agoFlipsnack and the shift toward motion-first business content with living visuals
-
Fashion6 days agoThe Best Spring Trends of 2026
-
Tech5 days agoHow to back up your iPhone & iPad to your Mac before something goes wrong
-
Crypto World7 days ago
Bitcoin’s Six-Month Losing Streak: What On-Chain Data Says About the Market’s Next Move
-
Politics6 days agoBBC slammed for ignoring author of The Fraud
-
Crypto World6 days agoU.S. rule change may open trillions in 401(k) funds to crypto
You must be logged in to post a comment Login