Rumer Willis is once again at the center of an online debate after sharing a deeply personal parenting moment that quickly divided opinion. 

The actress, who has been open about her motherhood journey since welcoming daughter Louetta in April 2023, posted a clip of herself breastfeeding, only to be met with both praise and sharp criticism. 

As the conversation escalated, Willis didn’t hold back, defending her choices while also shedding light on her life as a single mother navigating public scrutiny.

Rumer Willis Fires Back At Parenting Critics With Bold Response

Rumer Willis made it clear she wasn’t interested in staying quiet after facing repeated criticism over her parenting. 

Sharing a video of herself breastfeeding her daughter on Instagram, she addressed the backlash directly with a pointed message.

Overlaying the clip, she wrote, “When someone starts judging my parenting,” before cutting to a viral TikTok clip of a woman encouraging people to mind their business. 

The TikTok clip featured the woman drawing two circles on a whiteboard and saying, “This is my business,” pointing to one circle, “And this is yours,” while pointing to another circle. 

“I am here,” she continued, referring to the first circle. “The problem is, you are also here,” she added, pointing to the same circle before drawing a line to the second circle. “When you need to be here,” the woman concluded.

Willis reinforced her stance in the caption with a blunt “Sorry not sorry,” signaling she had no intention of backing down.

Willis Faces Backlash Over Breastfeeding A Toddler

Despite her confident stance, Rumer Willis’ post drew sharp criticism from many who questioned her decision to continue breastfeeding as her daughter approaches three years old. 

Several commenters argued that once a child can ask for breastfeeding, it may be time to stop.

One person wrote, “Once a baby has teeth, it’s time to stop nursing. One woman lost her nip when lightening & thunder hit and scared the child.”

Another added, “3 is way too old to keep breastfed. Sorry honey!!” while others suggested transitioning to alternatives like pumping or using a cup, calling it a more typical milestone.

“This is just insane. Just pump and let her drink from a cup,” one person shared.

Some critics went further, claiming the practice was no longer about the child’s needs. A comment reading, “It’s more for you at this point. Not sorry.” captured that sentiment. 

Others framed their concerns around milestones and discipline, suggesting that parents should guide children away from habits like breastfeeding as they grow older.

Rumer Willis Gets Support From Fans Who Share Similar Experiences

While backlash was loud, Willis also received strong support from followers who related to her experience. 

Many mothers shared their own stories of extended breastfeeding, pushing back against the criticism and encouraging her to ignore the negativity.

Some supporters emphasized that nursing beyond toddler years is both natural and beneficial. 

One wrote, “I breastfed my daughter until she was three; no regrets,” while another commented, “I think it’s a beautiful thing. My cousin breastfed her son until he was 5. It’s your business F others and their opinion.”

Some described breastfeeding as something that fosters comfort, bonding, and long-term emotional security. 

Others applauded Willis for being open about a topic they feel is often unfairly judged. 

“Good job, mama!!! You are normalizing normal, healthy parenting. Carry on — you are on the right path!!!” one fan commented.

Willis Accused Of Inviting Judgment By Posting Private Moment

A major portion of the criticism wasn’t just about breastfeeding, but about Rumer Willis choosing to share the moment publicly. 

Many argued that by posting such personal content online, she was inevitably opening herself up to scrutiny.

One commenter wrote, “No one is judging your parenting, just posting breast feeding…..which you’ve now made public and everyone’s business.” 

Another shared, “What a ridiculous post. If you don’t want people in your business then keep it private,” while a third commented, “Why put yourself out there to be judged? Why have to show everyone what you’re doing with your child? Some things should just be private and that’s okay too.”

Some critics even suggested the post was intentional, labeling it “rage bait” and questioning her motives. 

Others expressed concern about Louetta’s future, wondering how she might feel seeing these moments shared online.

Rumer Willis Defends Her Choices And Opens Up About Motherhood

Willis has faced similar backlash before and has consistently defended her choices. 

During World Breast Feeding Week in August 2024, she described breastfeeding as “one of the most joyful and bonding experiences of my life,” adding that she and her daughter would figure out together when to stop.

She also highlighted its benefits, noting per the Daily Mail, “Breast milk is a miraculous living substance, rich in antibodies, essential nutrients, and enzymes that bolster a baby’s immune system and promote healthy development,” framing it as more than just nourishment.

Addressing criticism about sharing such moments, Willis previously said, “I didn’t grow up in a house where we had shame about being naked, ever,” making it clear that her perspective is shaped by her upbringing. 

She also pushed back against the sexualization of breastfeeding, stating, “I’m feeding my kid. It’s not sexual unless you’re making it that way.”

Beyond the controversy, Willis has been candid about her personal life. She revealed she is raising her daughter independently, saying, “I am single momming it and co-parenting. I’m so grateful for Lou,” and calling her “the best thing in my life.”

Chile! The internet is in tears after Rod Wave was caught fully in his feelings while singing along at Ye’s, formerly known as Kanye West, latest concert.

Related: Yikes! Rod Wave Shuts Down Woman Claiming He Fathered Her Child After She Demands DNA Tests

Ye Brings Out Major Guest For Second L.A. Comeback Show

On Friday, Ye held his second comeback show in Los Angeles at SoFi Stadium. The performance followed his first return show earlier in the week on Wednesday, April 1.

Ye ran through a mix of new and old fan-favorite hits from his catalog. Night two also came with a few surprises, including a special appearance from Lauryn Hill. She joined Ye onstage for a live performance of ‘All Falls Down’ before transitioning into one of her own records.

The show continued to deliver star power, with Travis Scott and CeeLo Green also hitting the stage. Meanwhile, 12-year-old North West returned for another performance alongside her dad after appearing during the first show.

Rod Wave Goes Viral While Singing ‘All Falls Down’

While the stage was packed with major guests, the crowd also had its own viral moments. Celebrities in attendance were seen singing along throughout the night and sharing their view. One artist in particular, Rod Wave, definitely stole the show online.

The Florida artist shared clips from the concert on his Instagram Story, including one standout moment during “All Falls Down.” As Lauryn Hill and Ye performed, Rod could be heard loudly singing along, passionately trying to hit every note.

The clip quickly made its rounds on social media, with fans joking that his raw vocals sounded just like how they belt out his songs at his own concerts.

Social Media Is Crying Laughing

Social media users wasted no time chiming in, flooding comment sections with jokes and relatable reactions.

Instagram user @heydimpless wrote, “He sound just like his songs just without the instrument 😂😂😂😂”

Another Instagram user @banksbig4 wrote, “Tb sum “NAH FORREAL” 😭”

While Instagram user @_mickishaaa wrote, “Exactly how I be at his concert 😭😭”

Instagram user @s.for.shametria wrote, “he sound funny bra 😂😂😂😂”

Another Instagram user @mariiipyt wrote, “Just hootin and hollerin 😂😂😂😂😂”

While Instagram user @nasia.lavay_ wrote, “having the time of his life 😂😂😂😂😂”

Instagram user @iiamroyaltybaby wrote, “he sounds like me 😂😂😂😂 a hot mess”

Another Instagram user @onlyycharm wrote, “this canning be the same Rodarius Green who sings”

While Instagram user @jadorekiss_monae wrote, “😭😭😭😭 He sang that with his chest too 🫶🏽”

Related: New Era Loading? Rod Wave Clears The Air On His “Sad Artist” Reputation While Teasing New Album (VIDEOS)

Taylor Frankie Paul revealed she is “detaching” from the Mormon church.

“Born and raised Mormon (LDS) and I’ll always have love and respect towards it. I’ll even continue to go with my family at times … with that being said, it’s time to detach myself from it,” the Secret Lives of Mormon Wives star shared in a Sunday, April 5, Instagram Story.

Taylor, 31, continued, “I strongly believe in Christ, God, the bible, the divine. I believe we are loved whether we are praying in [a] church building or from a bathroom floor at home. I’ve also experienced grace and love from amazing people that aren’t sure what they believe if at all and that’s okay too.”

“Point being there is more out there to learn. And I’m writing this out as a release,” she concluded.

Related: Revisiting Taylor Frankie Paul’s Ups and Downs Through the Years

Taylor Frankie Paul exploded onto the internet when she started sharing social media videos with a group of other Mormon moms during the coronavirus pandemic. Paul, who is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, often teamed up with Whitney Leavitt, Miranda McWhorter, Demi Engemann, Mayci Neeley, Mikayla Matthews, Layla Taylor […]

Taylor first gained fame in 2022 when she went public about a swinging scandal involving members of Utah’s Mormon church. Taylor revealed via TikTok that she and her husband at the time, Tate Paul, had engaged in “soft swinging” with other couples, including her Mormon Wives costar Miranda Hope McWhorter and Miranda’s ex, Chase McWhorter.

The swinging scandal and Taylor’s life in the Mormon church have both been central to Hulu’s hit reality show, which premiered in September 2024.

Taylor recently hit headlines after ABC pulled season 22 of The Bachelorette amid domestic violence allegations involving the reality star and her ex-boyfriend, Dakota Mortensen.

Taylor shares son Ever, 2, with Dakota, 33, as well as daughter Indy, 8, and son Ocean, 5, with ex-husband Tate.

Related: Taylor Frankie Paul Teased Her ‘Bachelorette’ Ending Before Cancellation

Advertisement

Taylor Frankie Paul dropped several teases about her journey on The Bachelorette ahead of ABC deciding to cancel the season. News broke in March that Taylor and on-again, off-again ex Dakota Mortensen were involved in a domestic incident, which led to The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives halting production on season 5. A spokesperson for […]

Earlier on Sunday, the influencer opened up about experiencing “hell on earth” over the last month.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

“The last 40 days felt like hell on earth,” she wrote alongside an Instagram video featuring candid moments from her life. “Through every panic attack I prayed for strength as I could feel my body breaking down and out from the distress of it all.”

“And HE sent just that in various ways along with so many undeniable signs saying ‘I am with you’ which I can’t wait to share that part,” she continued. “I’ve prayed since I was young and never strayed away because I believe he wants us to ask for help especially during our lowest points. However, instead of just asking I switched over to thanking him at the end of each day no matter how low I felt.”

ABC announced it was canceling Taylor’s season of The Bachelorette on March 19 after video footage emerged of her and Dakota involved in a 2023 domestic dispute. Utah’s Draper City Police Department and West Jordan Police Department later confirmed they were looking into separate allegations of domestic violence involving the pair, including one as recently as February.

When it comes to discussing the all-time greatest movies in American cinema, two names will always come up: The Godfather and The Godfather Part II. Francis Ford Coppola‘s timeless tale of family tragedy, legacy, and the deterioration of the human spirit has become synonymous with American cinema, a celebrated duology that is often used as the standard to compare all subsequent crime and drama movies. Sure, the third part, 1990’s infamous The Godfather Part III, isn’t as great as its predecessors, but it remains a riveting and poignant conclusion to the tragedy of Michael Corleone (Al Pacino). Together, they form one of the greatest film trilogies in the medium’s history, and their standing keeps improving with each passing year.

With such high praises, it’s easy to understand why these three movies are often considered among cinema’s indisputed masterpieces — yes, even Part III, despite its numerous and well-known shortcomings. Thus, the question arises: which of these three silver screen triumphs is the best one, the cream of the crop, the ultimate triumph among a group of undeniable masterworks? Chances are, you know which of the three isn’t the best one, but the other two are neck-and-neck. You might have another opinion, and many will surely have a lot to say about the one they believe is the best. However, there’s no denying that one of the Godfather movies is so good that it’s almost impossible to believe it’s real.

‘The Godfather Part III’ (1990)

Image via Paramount Pictures

Advertisement

As I said, you probably know which movie is not the best in the Godfather trilogy, and that’s The Godfather Part III. Arriving sixteen years after Part II, this coda to the story of Michael Corleone might be the most uneven of the three, but it remains a satisfying payoff to this decades-spanning tragedy. Set in the late ’70s and early ’80s, with an epilogue set in the mid-’90s, the film tells the final portion of Michael’s story, particularly his efforts to legitimize his family business, much to the chagrin of the other mafia dons. Meanwhile, Michael’s illegitimate nephew, Vincent (Andy Garcia), throws the family into chaos with his arrival and eventual romance with Michael’s daughter, Mary (Sofia Coppola).

For years, Part III has been unfairly maligned as the black sheep of the Godfather trilogy. Now, to be fair, much of the criticism is fair: in their review, Variety called it “two hours of exposition and 40 minutes of payoff,” and you know what? They’re spot on. Yet, there’s some real gold in those two hours of exposition, and the 40-minute payoff packs a strong punch, albeit far less impactful than the first two movies. Pacino is brilliant as the weary and nearly broken Michael, finally bearing the weight of decades of violence, ruthlessness, and moral compromise: his spirit is deteriorated, and his body is barely hanging on. For his part, Garcia is a welcome addition to the cast, making Vincent equal parts charming and reckless. Alas, we can’t discuss Part III without mentioning Sofia Coppola, whose performance has been widely panned for years now. It’s fair to say she was woefully miscast, but it’s also fair to say there is a certain ugliness in the way the film’s shortcomings are often solely placed at her feet. In the end, Part III is convoluted and uneven, but it remains a somber and melancholic culmination to a larger-than-life tale that redefined American cinema.

‘The Godfather’ (1972)

In 1972, Francis Ford Coppola revolutionized the industry with The Godfather, an adaptation of Mario Puzo‘s 1969 pulpy crime novel of the same name. The plot centers on Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando), the aging don of the Corleone crime family, and his efforts to shape his youngest son, Michael, into a worthy heir. Although initially unwilling to commit himself to a life of crime, Michael soon surrenders to his family’s influence, going from a reluctant outsider to a ruthless mafia boss who will stop at nothing to protect his empire. James Caan and John Cazale co-star as Vito’s oldest and middle sons, Sonny and Fredo.

The first Godfather marked a distinct before-and-after in mainstream filmmaking. Arriving in the early years of New Hollywood, it was a formative entry in the movement, challenging notions and reshaping what audiences expected from their crime sagas. There is a pervasive sense of dread looming over the film, an inescapable and nearly suffocating notion that everything can change from one scene to the next. Here, Coppola presents the erosion of the soul with such assuredness that one can’t help but feel empty after it ends. Yet, Michael’s deterioration is so compelling, so brutal yet so operatic that it becomes almost irresistible; you’re watching the very destruction of the human spirit, and there’s an eerie beauty to eat. It’s well known that The Godfather influenced how the real mafia behaved, making it one of the few films that actually changed history. Its legacy is nearly indescribable: much has been written about this film, and much will follow still. The Godfather is among those movies that are as good as everyone says, a true masterpiece that you must simply watch at least once before kicking the bucket.

‘The Godfather Part II’ (1974)

Image via Paramount Pictures

Two years after Coppola wowed the world with The Godfather, he did it all over again. The Godfather Part II presents two stories: the first is the rise of young Vito Corleone (Robert De Niro) at the turn of the century, chronicling how he went from a lowly Italian refugee in New York City into the head of one of the most powerful mafia families. The second continues Michael’s rise in power as the new don of the Corleone family, focusing on his efforts to protect the business and ensure his place following an attempt on his life.

The question of whether The Godfather or The Godfather Part II is better has been going on for decades now. You could make a convincing argument for both, but this time, we have to give it to the sequel. Part II is monumental in scope, brilliant in construction, tragic in storytelling, and outright masterful in execution. The choice to juxtapose Michael’s further descent into darkness with Vito’s rise in the criminal world is a stroke of genius, allowing the parallel stories to build towards the same conclusion. Part II is more operatic, more detailed in its exploration of Vito and Michael’s psyche, and therefore far more tragic. There is a solemnity and melancholic inevitability to the story, the sense that ambition will always come first for the Corleones: they will get everything, only to lose it all because, in a world of absolute power, there can never be absolute trust. Here, commitment becomes imprisonment, and family is a life sentence. In the end, The Godfather Part II surpasses its predecessor in every possible way, presenting a heartbreaking tale of power, a beautiful calamity that is, quite possibly, the greatest achievement in American cinema.

In this day and age, franchise films have overwhelmed the cultural landscape, but one still finds a way to reinvent itself. This IP continues to impress, even decades after it came screaming out of the darkness. Sci-fi horror was in its early days in the ‘70s, but Ridley Scott’s Alien redefined what it meant to be scared.

Starring Sigourney Weaver, the first Alien film was a jarring flip on the script. Instead of slasher films that often victimized women, the pendulum swung the other way. Weaver stars as Ripley, an officer on the spaceship Nostromo who is really the only person concerned when an alien lifeform is found. Instead of adhering to the quarantine protocols, Captain Dallas (Tom Skerritt) brings an infected crew member on board, which allows the Xenomorph to be born — literally and painfully. Alien shows sexual violence pointed at men instead of women, and this first film fueled a sci-fi franchise that continues to impress audiences.

‘Alien’ Is Still Terrorizing Film and Television Audiences

The heart of the Alien films is the “perfect organism” that has been terrorizing viewers since 1979. This concept is what makes the series so addictive — and why the Weyland-Yutani corporation continues to try and capture the ultimate predator for profit. Alien has always been a source of fascination for viewers in the theaters, even with the less-than-popular franchise films. Following Sigourney Weaver’s tenure as Ellen Ripley, the series continued with some unfairly criticized sequels.

Prometheus served as a divisive prequel to the franchise, co-written by Lost co-showrunner Damon Lindelof. Viewers took issue with the Engineers, but the origins of the Xenomorph were still a captivating story. Starring Noomi Rapace, Charlize Theron, and Idris Elba, Prometheus shows the challenges of looking for faith in all the wrong places.

For some, the film was a misfire, but like the Xenomorph, the franchise always returned. Recent additions, such as Alien: Romulus, capitalized on what made the franchise so enduring to begin with. A love letter to the series, Romulus, takes place between Alien and Aliens as a crew imprisoned by Weyland-Yutani gets trapped in another version of Ripley’s story. Horror director Fede Álvarez finds the sweet spot with the film, showing the heartbreaking reality of an android with the character Andy (David Jonsson) and a killer third act – in more ways than one.

It was with FX’s television series, Alien: Earth, that really showed how to do a franchise right. The series elevated the original concept of a victim stuck in a room with a killing machine and broadened the concept even further. Created by Fargo scribe Noah Hawley, the series is set a couple of years before the first Alien film.

At its core, Alien has always been a criticism of capitalism, which Hawley’s series explores. At a time when technology has reached its peak, corporations have been looking for a path to immortality. Humanity has created cyborgs, fully synthetic life, and hybrids. This sets up the main conflict when a research ship crashes into Earth, carrying a deadly secret.

Alien: Earth is just another way to explore the themes set up in Alien with even more specificity. This franchise continues to draw in viewers not just because of the scares, but also because of the social commentary that was always part of the IP’s DNA. Alien defined sci-fi horror and continues to show others in the genre how it’s done.

A plan for a “Schitt’s Creek” revival was considered, but it will no longer move forward following Catherine O’Hara‘s death. The series’ co-creator, Dan Levy, who was also the late actress’ co-star, revealed that he was thinking of creating a sequel to the beloved sitcom, but it’s no longer in the cards.

O’Hara’s unforgettable performance as the Rose family matriarch was a defining part of the show, making any continuation without her difficult to imagine.

Dan Levy Shuts Down The Possibility Of A ‘Schitt’s Creek’ Revival

Dan Levy, who co-created “Schitt’s Creek” with his father, Eugene Levy, visited Goodwood, Ontario, with “CBS Sunday Morning.” The town was where the series was shot, and it was Dan’s first time returning since they wrapped up filming in 2020 after six seasons.

“The memories are flooding back, I’ll tell you that,” Dan told CBS’ Anthony Mason. The broadcast journalist then brought up whether there’ll be a sequel, a question that fans have been asking. In a somber voice, Dan answered, “No. Not now.”

Advertisement

Dan, who played O’Hara’s character’s son, David Rose, continued, “No. You can’t.” He revealed that before O’Hara’s death, he was thinking about making a revival. He became visibly emotional, wiping tears from his eyes as he said, “It’s tough,” adding that he’s holding on to the memories of O’Hara.

On a lighter note, he shared, “For someone who was not on the internet, she knew how to meme.”

The Showrunner Said Catherine O’Hara Death Was A ‘Collective Loss’

On March 31, Dan appeared on “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon,” where he talked about the late actress. He recalled how his first time on the talk show was with his fellow “Schitt’s Creek” stars. “It’s a collective loss, I think. She was the greatest. She’s irreplaceable,” Dan said.

Despite the grief, he said that he finds great comfort in knowing how much the late actress was loved. “You know what I mean? The outpouring. Everyone felt like they kind of knew her,” Dan explained.

Fallon agreed, saying O’Hara was “one of the funniest comedians,” and not only was she talented, but she was also “gorgeous.” “One of the great, great, great, great queens,” Dan added.

Advertisement

Eugene Levy’s History With The Late Actress

Dan has known O’Hara long before working with her on “Schitt’s Creek.” His father, Eugene Levy, who played O’Hara’s husband Johnny Rose on “Schitt’s Creek,” had a decades-long professional relationship with the actress.

Eugene and O’Hara first met in the ’70s and were both featured on the Canadian sketch comedy series “SCTV,” and they worked on multiple projects together throughout the years. Following her death, he paid tribute to his co-star, saying, “Words seem inadequate to express the loss I feel today. I had the honor of knowing and working with the great Catherine O’Hara for over fifty years.”

Eugene continued to say that more than their working relationship, he also cherished their genuine friendship. “I will miss her,” he noted.

Catherine O’Hara’s Death Will Be Acknowledged In ‘The Studio’

O’Hara starred in Seth Rogen‘s series “The Studio” before her untimely death, playing Patty Leigh, a film producer let go from the fictional studio Continental Pictures. The series is returning for a second season, and according to Rogen, the late actress’ death will be acknowledged.

In an interview with The Times published on April 3, Rogen recalled working with the actress, saying, “We just wanted her to think we were funny.” Following her death, Rogen said dealing with the loss was an “unbelievable challenge,” both emotionally and in terms of the series. He said they wrote the series for O’Hara’s character to be present.

“While we try to not dwell too much on heavy themes in this show, they will be there in this second season. We are not ignoring it,” Rogen said, referring to O’Hara’s absence.

Advertisement

Catherine O’Hara Was Ill Before Her Death

O’Hara’s last public appearance was at the Emmy Awards held in September 2025, where she was nominated for Outstanding Supporting Actress award for her role in “The Studio.”

She died on January 30, 2026, at 71 years old. As reported by The Blast, the veteran actress’ cause of death was determined to be pulmonary embolism, which occurs when lung arteries get blocked by a blood clot. However, there was also an underlying cause, which was rectal cancer. She is survived by her husband, Bo Welch, and their two sons, Matthew and Luke.

Taylor Frankie Paul is opening up about one of the most chaotic and emotionally draining periods of her life, and she isn’t sugarcoating it. 

The reality TV star, currently entangled in domestic violence allegations, a custody battle, and major career setbacks, shared a deeply personal glimpse into her struggles over the past several weeks. 

In a raw social media post, Paul described enduring panic attacks, physical stress, and spiritual reflection, giving fans a clearer picture of what she’s been facing behind the headlines.

Taylor Frankie Paul Says Last 40 Days Felt Like ‘Hell’ Amid Ongoing Drama

Taylor Frankie Paul didn’t hold back when describing the emotional toll of her recent experiences. 

In a candid Instagram post shared on April 5, she revealed just how intense the past several weeks have been.

“The last 40 days felt like hell on earth,” Paul wrote in the caption, pairing the statement with a video montage capturing unfiltered moments from her daily life. 

The 31-year-old described enduring repeated panic attacks, writing, “Through every panic attack I prayed for strength as I could feel my body breaking down and out from the distress of it all.”

The video itself painted a stark picture, showing her physically unwell, reflecting privately, and leaning on her faith. 

Over the video, she added a text overlay that read, “He has risen and he is real,” signaling how central her beliefs have been during this time. 

She also noted the timing of her realization, writing, “I got chills today when I realized it’s been 40 days exactly today in this frantic state.”

Paul Shares How Faith Became Her Anchor During Crisis

Amid the chaos, Taylor Frankie Paul emphasized how her spirituality has helped her cope. 

Referencing Easter, she described feeling supported through what she viewed as divine intervention.

“He sent just that in various ways along with so many undeniable signs saying ‘I am with you’ which I can’t wait to share that part,” she wrote, expressing a deep sense of connection to her Christian faith.

Paul also reflected on how her approach to prayer has evolved. “I’ve prayed since I was young and never strayed away because I believe he wants us to ask for help especially during our lowest points,” she shared. 

However, instead of only asking for help, she began shifting her mindset. “However, instead of just asking I switched over to thanking him at the end of each day no matter how I felt,” the influencer wrote.

Taylor Frankie Paul Distances Herself From Mormon Church After Scandal

In another emotional update shared the same day, Paul revealed a major personal decision. 

She noted that she’s stepping back from the Mormon church. The move comes in the wake of mounting controversy surrounding her personal life.

In the Instagram story post, the “Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” star explained that she was born and raised Mormon and would always have love and respect toward it.

However, she added that “with that being said, it’s time to detach myself from it.” While Paul noted she may still attend certain events with family, her relationship with organized religion is clearly shifting.

“I strongly believe in Christ, God, the Bible, the divine,” she said, emphasizing that her faith remains intact despite the change. Paul also added, “I believe we are loved whether we are praying in the church building or from a bathroom floor at home.”

The television personality acknowledged that she had received support from people of varying beliefs. 

She described the post as a form of release, hinting at the emotional weight she had been carrying.

Paul Faces Legal Battles And Custody Dispute With Ex

At the center of Taylor Frankie Paul’s current struggles are serious legal issues involving her ex, Dakota Mortensen. 

He has accused her of domestic violence stemming from an alleged February incident, claiming she “scratched” him and committed physical assault.

According to Us Weekly, Mortensen later alleged there were “two incidents of physical assault,” prompting authorities to open a second investigation. 

However, no charges have been filed so far. Paul has denied all allegations and countered with claims that Mortensen was the abusive party, which he has also denied.

The situation has extended into a custody dispute over their 2-year-old son, Ever. Court documents confirmed that Mortensen was granted temporary custody, along with a restraining order against Paul. 

She is expected to attend a court hearing on Tuesday regarding her custodial rights.

The fallout has also impacted her career. Filming for “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” season 5 has been paused, and her planned appearance on “The Bachelorette” was scrapped. 

Taylor Frankie Paul’s Past Incident Resurfaces As New Footage Emerges

Complicating matters further, past incidents involving Paul have resurfaced. Body camera footage from her 2023 arrest has reentered public conversation, offering a glimpse into a previous altercation with Mortensen.

In the clip published by TMZ, the pair were seen arguing as police arrived at the scene. 

Mortensen told officers that Paul was “not doing OK” and added, “I can’t even tell you the stuff that’s happened to me,” while showing alleged injuries. 

As tensions escalated, the reality TV star reportedly became emotional, while officers worked to separate them. 

After her arrest, Mortensen even asked officers if he could go to jail instead, saying he wanted her “to get help.” 

The incident ultimately led to Paul pleading guilty to aggravated assault in August 2023, with additional charges dropped as part of a deal. She remains on probation, which is expected to conclude in August 2026.

In the past few years, South Korea has become a powerhouse in the entertainment industry. 2019’s Parasite became the first non-English-language movie to win Best Picture at the Oscars, and Squid Game took the streaming world by storm in 2021, beating Bridgerton as the most-watched Netflix premiere. But Netflix was building its Korean-drama fanbase even before Parasite won at the 2020 Oscars, kicking things off with the zombie series Kingdom.

The 2019 series features Bae Doona, Ju Ji-hoon, and Kim Sang-ho fighting against both a zombie outbreak and a political coup in 17th-century Korea. It’s not the first period piece to include zombies, but it is one of the first out of Korea. More than that, it is an excellent combination of political intrigue and impressively gory zombie violence that deserves its place as one of the best Korean shows on Netflix.

‘Kingdom’ Is Netflix’s First South Korean Series

Image via Netflix

K-dramas are huge on Netflix: in 2022, co-CEO Ted Sarandos stated that over 60% of its users have watched at least one. They also saw a staggering sixfold increase in ‘K-content’ viewership since 2018. And everyone is waiting with bated breath for the second season of the mega-hit Squid Game. And all of this has only happened in the last few years. While Netflix previously offered Korean shows and movies, they only started creating their own original Korean content in 2019.

Kingdom was the start of it all, becoming the first Netflix original series from Korea. The horror/political drama mash-up received rave reviews, quickly becoming one of the top hits of the year due to its strong writing, beautiful (and terrifying) visuals, and excellent cast. Kingdom boasts several familiar faces for both dedicated fans of K-drama and fans of Netflix shows in general. One of the major players in Kingdom, Seo Bi, is portrayed by Bae Doona, star of the popular Sense8 series and the recent Rebel Moon films. Kingdom also features Kim Sang-ho, who fans can watch in Sweet Home‘s third and final season.

What Is ‘Kingdom’ About Exactly?

One of the biggest draws of Kingdom is its historical setting and the fact that it’s unusual to see a zombie movie or show not set in contemporary times. That’s not to say it hasn’t been done before; Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is possibly the most famous example, set in Regency-period England. And 2018’s Overlord is a zombie-adjacent movie set in WWII. But Kingdom offers a fresh take on the genre outside a Western point of view. Kingdom takes place 400 years ago and offers a look at Korea that Western viewers rarely see.

Kingdom also treats its historical setting with gravitas, incorporating it intrinsically into the zombie story it wants to tell, instead of using it as a source of humor or satire. Ju Ji-hoon plays Lee Chang, the only son of the King of Joseon (what would become modern-day Korea), through a concubine. Although Lee Chang has many supporters, the Queen Consort is pregnant with a child who, if a boy, would have a more legitimate claim to the throne. She and her supporters will stop at nothing to ensure her child becomes king instead of Lee Chang.

‘Kingdom’ Balances Politics and Zombies in a Medieval-Inspired Korea

The political plot of Kingdom is well-crafted and nuanced, deserving as much praise for its storytelling as this year’s awards darling, Shōgun, in terms of strong characters and political chess games. But don’t worry, zombie fans — in addition to the social commentary, detailed costumes, and beautiful scenery, there’s plenty of terror and gore in Kingdom. In fact, the zombie outbreak stems directly from the political machinations of the Queen Consort’s clan.

The zombies themselves are the fast-moving, 28 Days Later variety, leading to plenty of tense chase sequences throughout the series. And when the protagonists have to fend off the zombies face-to-face, Kingdom doesn’t shy away from putting all the gore on screen. Whether a zombie horde rips apart a helpless victim or an attacking zombie gets an arrow through the neck, the series makes sure to keep the horror on equal footing with the politics.

In short, Kingdom has something for everyone. For K-drama devotees, there are recognizable faces and familiar story beats to enjoy. For political drama enthusiasts, the social commentary in the show is on point. And, of course, for those who love a good zombie thriller, Kingdom can ratchet up the tension and terror as well as any classic Romero flick.

Kingdom is available to stream in the U.S. on Netflix.

Advertisement

Kingdom

Advertisement

Release Date

2019 – 2020-00-00

Advertisement

Directors

Kim Seong-hun, Park In-je

Writers

Advertisement

Kim Eun-hee

Advertisement

• 
• 

Advertisement

Advertisement