Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Entertainment

King Charles, More Royals React to Prince Andrew’s Arrest and Epstein Ties

Published

on

Royal watchers learned in October 2025 that King Charles III stripped his younger brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor — formerly known as Prince Andrew — of his royal titles and evicted him from his lavish home.

The former prince’s spectacular fall from grace has been tied to his friendship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Mountbatten-Windsor told BBC’s Newsnight in 2019 that he met Epstein through the disgraced financier’s girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, though he denied any wrongdoing. (Epstein was convicted of procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting a prostitute in 2008 and was later arrested on federal sex trafficking charges weeks before his death by suicide in August 2019. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking charges.)

In that same 2019 interview, Mountbatten-Windsor insisted he did not regret his friendship with Epstein despite the damage to his reputation.

“Now, [I] still [do] not [regret it] and the reason being is that the people that I met and the opportunities that I was given to learn either by him or because of him were actually very useful,” Mountbatten Windsor told Newsnight. “He himself not, as it were, as close as you might think, we weren’t that close. So therefore I mean, yes, I would go and stay in his house but that was because of his girlfriend, not because of him.”

Advertisement
King Charles and Prince Andrew


Related: King Charles Heckled Over Prince Andrew’s Ties to the Late Jeffrey Epstein

King Charles cannot escape the continued media attention on his brother Prince Andrew’s longstanding friendship with the late convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. “How long have you known about Andrew and Epstein?” an individual shouted at Charles, 76, as the royal greeted the public outside Lichfield Cathedral in Staffordshire on Monday, October 27, per footage shared […]

The fallout from Mountbatten-Windsor’s 2019 interview led him to step back from his royal duties in November 2019, though he was eventually stripped of his titles by King Charles in October 2025 as continual revelations emerged. In February 2026, Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested by Thames Valley Police on his 66th birthday on suspicion of misconduct in public office, with King Charles later calling for a “full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated.”

Advertisement

Keep scrolling for more about the way Charles and other royals reacted to Mountbatten-Windsor’s friendship with Epstein.

How Is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Connected to Jeffrey Epstein?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor told BBC Newsnight host Emily Maitlis in a 2019 interview that he met Jeffrey Epstein through the convicted sex offender’s former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. (Ghislaine’s father, Robert Maxwell, was part of the media establishment in the U.K. as owner of the Daily Mirror and The London Evening News prior to his death at age 68 in 1991.)

While Mountbatten-Windsor never faced criminal charges over his alleged involvement with Epstein, he was sued for sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress by Virginia Giuffre in 2021. Giuffre alleged that Epstein and Maxwell trafficked her to Mountbatten-Windsor following a night at Tramp nightclub in London in 2001.

“I have no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever,” Mountbatten-Windsor insisted to Newsnight.

Advertisement

However, Mountbatten-Windsor reached a private settlement with Giuffre in 2022 after she sued him for sexual assault and battery. (He did not admit any fault as part of the settlement agreement though he agreed to make a substantial donation to Speak Out, Act, Reclaim, a charity supporting sex trafficking victims.)

Mountbatten-Windsor claimed that he visited Epstein at his New York penthouse in December 2010 to formally end their friendship. At the time, Epstein had recently completed his 18-month prison sentence for procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting a prostitute.

“I have always … ever since this has happened and since this has become, as it were, public knowledge that I was there, I’ve questioned myself as to why did I go and what was I doing and was it the right thing to do?” Mountbatten-Windsor told Newsnight. “Now, I went there with the sole purpose of saying to him that because he had been convicted, it was inappropriate for us to be seen together.”

GettyImages-477232104 How King Charles III and Royals Reacted to Prince Andrew Ties to Epstein

Andrew and King Charles III in 2015
Peter Nicholls – WPA Pool /Getty Images

Mountbatten-Windsor admitted that he’d had “a number of people counsel” him over whether it was appropriate to visit Epstein’s home in the wake of his conviction.

“I took the judgement call that, because this was serious, and I felt that doing it over the telephone was the chicken’s way of doing it. I had to go and see him and talk to him,” he said.

Advertisement

He added, “I said to [Epstein] … ‘Look, because of what has happened, I don’t think it is appropriate that we should remain in contact,’ and by mutual agreement during that walk in the park we decided that we would part company and I left, I think it was the next day. To this day, I never had any contact with him from that day forward.”

His friendship with Epstein faced a new level of scrutiny when a paparazzi photo from Mountbatten-Windsor and Epstein’s Central Park conversation was published by the New York Post in 2011. As a result of the scandal, Buckingham Palace announced in July 2011 that Mountbatten-Windsor had resigned as a U.K. trade envoy.

Any attempt by Mountbatten-Windsor to put the scandal behind him with his 2019 Newsnight interview failed. The TV special only intensified coverage of the scandal, leading to Mountbatten-Windsor formally stepping back from his royal duties in November 2019.

“It has become clear to me over the last few days that the circumstance relating to my former association with Jeffrey Epstein has become a major disruption to my family’s work and the valuable work going on in the many organizations and charities that I am proud to support,” he said. “Therefore, I have asked Her Majesty if I may step back from public duties for the foreseeable future, and she has given her permission.”

Advertisement

While Mountbatten-Windsor was slowly reintegrated into royal functions a few years later, a new round of allegations erupted with the publication of Andrew Lownie’s tell-all 2025 book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York.

Multiple U.K. outlets published private emails that Mountbatten-Windsor allegedly sent to Epstein in 2011, which contradicted his statement that he’d cut off communication with the financier after visiting his New York City home in December 2010. In one purported email, the prince allegedly wrote to Epstein that they were “in this together and will have to rise above it.”

Mountbatten-Windsor said in October 2025 that he would stop using his royal title as the Duke of York.

“In discussion with The King, and my immediate and wider family, we have concluded the continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal Family,” Mountbatten-Windsor said in a statement to Us on October 17, 2025. “I have decided, as I always have, to put my duty to my family and country first. I stand by my decision five years ago to stand back from public life.”

Advertisement

He continued, “With His Majesty’s agreement, we feel I must now go a step further. I will therefore no longer use my title or the honors which have been conferred upon me. As I have said previously, I vigorously deny the accusations against me.”

Once again, his pledge did little to quiet the scandal, so Buckingham Palace confirmed days later that King Charles III planned to strip his brother of his royal titles and force him to move out of his home at Royal Lodge, which Mountbatten-Windsor acquired in 2003 as part of a “peppercorn lease.”

Later that year, Mountbatten-Windsor was accused of asking his taxpayer-funded security detail to investigate Giuffre prior to their 2022 legal settlement. The Metropolitan Police announced in December 2025 that it would “take no further action” against Mountbatten-Windsor over the historic accusation.

“The Met remains committed to thoroughly assessing any new information that could assist in this matter,” a police spokesperson said.”To date, we have not received any additional evidence that would support reopening the investigation. In the absence of any further information, we will be taking no further action.”

Advertisement

There were new disclosures in January 2026 as part of three million documents released by the Justice Department in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which included a photo obtained from the Epstein estate of Mountbatten-Windsor kneeling on all fours over an unknown woman. (The Justice Department provided no context on where or when the photo was taken. The unidentified woman’s face was redacted to protect her privacy.)

Mountbatten-Windsor reportedly moved out of Royal Lodge in February 2026. He is residing in a temporary property on his brother Charles’ privately-owned Sandringham estate while his permanent home is undergoing renovations.

Thames Valley Police confirmed to Us on February 19, 2026, that its officers had “arrested a man in his sixties from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office.” Mountbatten-Windsor’s name was not mentioned in the police statement due to national guidance.

Mountbatten-Windsor stands accused of sharing confidential information with Epstein while acting as a U.K. trade envoy from 2001 to 2011. Per the Crown Protection Service, those found criminally liable of “serious wilful abuse or neglect of the power or responsibilities of the public office held” can face a maximum punishment of life imprisonment.

Advertisement

What Did Queen Elizabeth II Say About Prince Andrew’s Connection to Jeffrey Epstein?

The Telegraph reported that Queen Elizabeth II partially funded her son Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s $16 million settlement to dismiss his sexual assault accuser Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit in 2022. The queen’s contribution reportedly came from her private Duchy of Lancaster estate so as not to draw criticism about public funds being used.

However, a spokesperson for Queen Elizabeth told People in February 2022 that Buckingham Palace “never commented on the financial aspects of the Duke’s private legal affairs and won’t be now.”

One month earlier, Buckingham Palace revealed that Queen Elizabeth was revoking Mountbatten-Windsor’s military titles. Her rebuke came after more than 150 British military veterans wrote an open letter to the monarch asking her to strip Mountbatten-Windsor of his service awards.

“With the queen’s approval and agreement, the Duke of York’s military affiliations and royal patronages have been returned to the queen,” the palace said in a statement in January 2022. “The Duke of York will continue not to undertake any public duties and is defending this case as a private citizen.”

Advertisement

Queen Elizabeth died at age 96 in September 2002.

How Did King Charles III React to Prince Andrew’s Connection to Jeffrey Epstein?

King Charles III initially held back from addressing the growing scandal around his brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, amid new allegations in Andrew Lownie’s bombshell 2025 book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York.

While Mountbatten-Windsor agreed to stop using his royal title in October 2025, the king finally stepped in days later with his own royal decree. The king confirmed that he was essentially evicting Mountbatten-Windsor from his home at Royal Lodge, where the former prince lived since 2003.

“Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. His lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence,” reads a Buckingham Palace statement shared with Us Weekly on October 30, 2025. “Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease and he will move to alternative private accommodation. These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him.”

Advertisement

In a February 2026 statement, the palace noted, “The King has made clear, in words and through unprecedented actions, his profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct.”

The palace continued, “While the specific claims in question are for Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor to address, if we are approached by Thames Valley Police, we stand ready to support them as you would expect. As was previously stated, Their Majesties’ thoughts and sympathies have been, and remain with, the victims of any and all forms of abuse.”

Following Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest in February 2026, King Charles released a statement confirming that he’d “learned with the deepest concern the news about [the arrest of] Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and suspicion of misconduct in public office.”

“What now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities. In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and cooperation,” King Charles said in a statement to Us. “Let me state clearly: the law must take its course. As this process continues, it would not be right for me to comment further on this matter. Meanwhile, my family and I will continue in our duty and service to you all.”

Advertisement

How Did Prince Edward React to Prince Andrew’s Connection to Jeffrey Epstein?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s younger brother, Prince Edward, became the first member of the royal family to personally address the Epstein scandal in February 2025. During a Q&A for the World Governments Summit in Dubai, he was asked how he was “coping” with the continual controversy.

“I think it’s important always to remember the victims,” Prince Edward answered. “And who are the victims in all this? A lot of victims in all this.”

Advertisement

How Did Prince William and Kate Middleton React to Prince Andrew’s Connection to Jeffrey Epstein?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s nephew Prince William and his wife, Princess Kate Middleton, released a statement as new documents from the Epstein files continued to go public.

“I can confirm The Prince and Princess have been deeply concerned by the continuing revelations,” a spokesperson for the Prince and Princess of Wales shared in February 2026. “Their thoughts remain focused on the victims.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

BAFTA Awards Chaos Exposed In Shocking Review Report

Published

on

Michael B. Jordan at the 2026 BAFTAs

The fallout from the BAFTA Film Awards controversy continues to ripple through the entertainment world, as a damning independent review reveals what really went wrong.

What should have been a celebratory night quickly spiraled into chaos, leaving organizers, broadcasters, and audiences grappling with uncomfortable truths about planning, accountability, and oversight.

BAFTA Review Reveals Structural Weaknesses

Michael B. Jordan at the 2026 BAFTAs
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

An independent investigation into the awards ceremony uncovered serious cracks in the system that contributed to the widely criticized on-air moment.

The review, commissioned by the BAFTA board and conducted by RISE Associates, highlighted “a number of structural weaknesses” in planning, escalation procedures, and crisis coordination.

Advertisement

While the findings were critical, the board emphasized that “it did not find evidence of malicious intent on the part of those involved in delivering the event. We accept its conclusions in full.”

Still, the absence of ill intent did little to soften the broader implications.

The report, made available to The Hollywood Reporter, clarified that BAFTA’s internal systems were not robust enough to handle unexpected incidents, particularly in a live broadcast environment where timing and responsiveness are crucial.

BAFTA Apology Acknowledges Deep Impact

John Davidson; Dottie Achenbach; Robert Aramayo;Murray Gladstone attend the Nominees' Party for the EE BAFTA Film Awards 2026 at the National Portrait Gallery
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

In the wake of the controversy, BAFTA issued a sweeping apology that addressed multiple communities affected by the incident.

The organization stated, “We apologize unreservedly to the Black community, for whom the racist language used carries real pain, brutality, and trauma; to the disability community, including people with Tourette Syndrome, for whom this incident has led to unfair judgement, stigma, and distress; and to all our members, guests at the ceremony and those watching at home. What was supposed to be a moment of celebration was diminished and overshadowed.”

Advertisement

The statement didn’t stop there. BAFTA also confirmed, “We have written to those directly impacted on the night to apologize.”

These acknowledgments showed the wide-reaching consequences of the incident, which went beyond a single moment on stage and ignited broader conversations about responsibility and sensitivity in global broadcasts.

BBC Faces Backlash Over Broadcast Failure

John Davidson and Dottie Achenbach
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

The controversy didn’t just stop with BAFTA. The BBC, which aired the ceremony, came under intense scrutiny for allowing the offensive language to make it to viewers despite a built-in delay.

Following its own investigation, the broadcaster’s Executive Complaints Unit delivered a blunt verdict earlier this week.

As The Blast reported, the unit stated, “The ECU found that the inclusion of the n-word in the broadcast (which was also streamed live on iPlayer) was highly offensive, had no editorial justification and represented a breach of the BBC’s editorial standards, but that the breach was unintentional.”

Advertisement

This conclusion placed the BBC in a delicate position, acknowledging the seriousness of the mistake while maintaining that it was not deliberate.

Former director-general Tim Davie had earlier described the incident as “a genuine error,” attributing the oversight to confusion during the editing process.

Despite these explanations, the backlash highlighted growing expectations for broadcasters to exercise tighter control over live and near-live content.

BAFTA Editing Breakdown Explained By BBC

Delroy Lindo
Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency / MEGA

Further details about the mishap revealed a breakdown not in policy, but in execution.

BBC chief content officer Kate Phillips shed light on how the moment slipped through the cracks.

Advertisement

She explained that the production team “did not hear the n-word at the time it was said and therefore no decision was taken to leave the word within the broadcast. The ECU accepted this was a genuine mistake.”

Phillips also pointed out that the team had successfully edited out another instance of the same word, adding that this was done “especially as the team did correctly identify and edit out a subsequent use of the same word, in line with the protocols that were agreed in advance of the event regarding offensive and unacceptable language.”

This explanation painted a picture of a system that, while theoretically sound, failed at a critical moment when vigilance mattered most.

BAFTA Streaming Delay Fuels Outrage

Michael B. Jordan at 31st Annual Critics Choice Awards
LISA OConnor/AFF-USA.com / MEGA

If the initial broadcast sparked concern, the delayed removal of the footage only intensified public anger.

The unedited version remained accessible online longer than expected, compounding the damage.

Advertisement

The ECU did not mince words, calling the delay a “serious mistake” and noting that “The fact that the unedited recording remained available for so long aggravated the offense caused by the inadvertent inclusion of the n-word in the broadcast.”

Kate Phillips addressed this issue as well, explaining, “There was a lack of clarity among the team present at the event as to whether the word was audible on the recording. This resulted in there being a delay before the decision was taken to remove the recording from iPlayer.”

The prolonged availability of the clip raised serious concerns about internal communication and crisis management, exposing gaps that extended beyond the initial mistake.

Ultimately, the review makes one thing clear: while the incident may not have been intentional, it exposed critical vulnerabilities in both BAFTA’s event planning and the BBC’s broadcast processes.

Advertisement

As both organizations promise reforms, the spotlight remains firmly fixed on whether meaningful change will follow or if history could repeat itself.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Keanu Reeves’ New 83-Minute Movie Lands Among His Worst-Rated Projects Ever

Published

on

outcome-poster.jpg

Of all the many blockbusters releasing this summer, few will likely hit the box office heights of Toy Story 5, which is predicted to match the success of the previous two installments and break the billion-dollar barrier. Woody (Tom Hanks), Buzz (Tim Allen), Jessie (Joan Cusack), and the rest of the gang will return to theaters on June 19, joined by several other new and returning names, including Tony Hale as Forky, Blake Clark as Slinky, and John Wick himself, Keanu Reeves, who reprises his role as Duke Caboom from the fourth installment.

However, before Reeves fans can enjoy the return of one of his lesser-discussed roles in recent memory, his latest project has finally debuted on Apple TV. Outcome, the latest directorial effort from Jonah Hill, officially premiered on the streamer on April 10 and stormed straight to the top of the U.S. charts. A satirical black comedy starring Reeves as Reef Hawk, the world’s biggest movie star, the film also features supporting performances from Matt Bomer and Cameron Diaz as Xander and Kyle, two of the only people to still like Reef.

The rest of the Outcome cast is stacked with talent, including Susan Lucci, Laverne Cox, David Spade (Saturday Night Live), Atsuko Okatsuka, Roy Wood, Jr., Welker White, Kaia Gerber, Ivy Wolk, and even the Hollywood icon Martin Scorsese as a washed-up talent agent. However, those excited about this latest Reeves role will be frustrated to hear that, upon its debut, the movie is being ripped apart by critics. At the time of writing, Outcome has earned a disastrous 25% score on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. This is Reeves’ lowest score for a film since 2018’s Replica.

Advertisement































































Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

🌀Everything Everywhere

☢️Oppenheimer

Advertisement

🐦Birdman

🪙No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

01

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





Advertisement

02

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





Advertisement

03

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





Advertisement

04

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





Advertisement

05

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





Advertisement

06

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





Advertisement

07

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





Advertisement

08

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





Advertisement

09

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





Advertisement

10

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





Advertisement

The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Advertisement

Parasite

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Advertisement

Everything Everywhere All at Once

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Advertisement

Oppenheimer

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Advertisement

Birdman

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

Advertisement

No Country for Old Men

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.

Advertisement

Advertisement

What Did Collider Say About ‘Outcome’?

Most critics might be disappointed by Outcome, but how did Collider respond? Well, Nate Richard agreed with the consensus that this is far from Reeves’ best work, scoring the film a 4/10 in his review. “Outcome is clearly coming from a personal place for Hill. It doesn’t come across as too bitter or full of self-pity, but the point of the movie is never made fully clear,” Richard wrote. “It moves at too quick a pace to leave much of an impact, and it’s a bit of a tonal nightmare. Hill has already proven himself as a director, but Outcome was a strange yet bold choice to make as his second narrative film.”

Outcome is streaming on Apple TV. Stay tuned for more stories.


outcome-poster.jpg
Advertisement


Advertisement

Release Date

April 10, 2026

Runtime

83 Minutes

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Sheriff Country’ Sneak Peek Reveals Mickey’s Next Case — and It’s Her Most Dangerous Yet [Exclusive]

Published

on

sheriff-country-poster.jpg

It’s not always easy to be the new kid on the block, but Fire Country’s debut spin-off, Sheriff Country, has proved that it’s here to stay. Now, six months after its debut episode promised audiences a different side to the in-universe town of Edgewater, California, the Morena Baccarin-led series is also showing that while it might have connections to the flagship series, it can proudly stand on its own. Each week, we’ve watched as the title has taken over global charts for its network home at CBS and, as we head into the fourteenth installment of its debut season, audiences have even gotten the crossover event they had long been hoping for with last week’s two-parter.

There’s no rest for the wicked and there’s certainly no slowing down for the brave first responders behind the primary story of Sheriff Country either. After last week’s chaotic installment that saw a group of children kidnapped and held captive, things aren’t getting any easier for Baccarin’s Sheriff Mickey Fox and the rest of her team on tonight’s episode titled “Show of Force.” Spirits are riding high in Edgewater during the town’s Blood Moon Festival, with its residents eager to take in one of nature’s most gorgeous sights. But, lurking and operating from the shadows, a serial killer goes after young women, throwing Mickey into a game of cat and mouse.

Ahead of the episode’s premiere later tonight, Collider is thrilled to unveil a sneak peek at the pulse-pounding story that brings a serial killer to Edgewater. Unfortunately for Mickey, a psychopathic murderer won’t be the only thing she’s dealing with after she’s forced to pick up the pieces when Hank (Ian Quinlan) loses his service vehicle. In our first look, Edgewater’s Sheriff sits her officer down for disciplinary action — but he isn’t the only one facing her wrath. While Hank may have been responsible for carrying out the hot-headed move that lost him his vehicle, Mickey is even more annoyed with Deputy Boone (Matt Lauria), who was the commanding officer at the time of the incident.

Advertisement





















































Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Taylor Sheridan Universe Quiz
Which Taylor Sheridan
Show Do You Belong In?

Yellowstone · Landman · Tulsa King · Mayor of Kingstown

Four worlds. All of them brutal, complicated, and built on power, loyalty, and the price of survival. Taylor Sheridan doesn’t write heroes — he writes people who do what they have to do and live with the cost. Ten questions will reveal which one of his worlds you were made for.

🤠Yellowstone

🛢️Landman

👑Tulsa King

Advertisement

⚖️Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

01

Where does your power come from?
In Sheridan’s world, everyone has leverage. The question is what kind.




Advertisement

02

Who do you put first, no matter what?
Loyalty in Sheridan’s universe is always absolute — and always costly.




Advertisement

03

Someone crosses a line. How do you respond?
Every Sheridan protagonist has a line. What matters is what happens after it’s crossed.




Advertisement

04

Where do you feel most in your element?
Sheridan’s worlds are as much about place as they are about people.




Advertisement

05

How do you feel about operating in the grey?
Nobody in a Sheridan show has clean hands. The question is how they carry the dirt.




Advertisement

06

What are you actually fighting to hold onto?
Every Sheridan character is fighting a war. The real question is what they’re defending.




Advertisement

07

How do you lead?
Authority in Sheridan’s world is never given — it’s established, maintained, and constantly tested.




Advertisement

08

Someone new arrives and tries to change how things work. Your reaction?
Every Sheridan show has an outsider disrupting an established order. Sometimes that outsider is you.




Advertisement

09

What has your position cost you?
Nobody gets to where these characters are without paying for it. The bill is always personal.




Advertisement

10

When it’s over, what do you want people to say?
Sheridan’s characters all know the ending is coming. The question is what they leave behind.




Advertisement
Sheridan Has Spoken
You Belong In…

The show that claimed the most of your answers is the world you were built for. If two tied, both are shown — you’re complicated enough to straddle two Sheridan universes.

Advertisement

🤠
Yellowstone

🛢️
Landman

👑
Tulsa King

⚖️
Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

You are a Dutton — or you might as well be. You understand that some things are worth protecting at any cost, and that the modern world’s indifference to history, to land, to legacy, is not something you’re willing to accept quietly. You lead from the front, you carry your family’s weight without complaint, and when someone threatens what’s yours, you don’t escalate — you finish it. You’re not cruel. But you are absolute. In Yellowstone’s world, that combination of ferocity and loyalty doesn’t make you a villain. It makes you the only thing standing between everything that matters and everyone who wants to take it.

You thrive in the chaos of high-stakes negotiation, where the money is enormous, the margins are thin, and the wrong word in the wrong room can cost everyone everything. You’re a fixer — the person called when a situation is already on fire and needs someone with the nerve to walk into it. West Texas oil country rewards exactly what you are: sharp, adaptable, unsentimental, and absolutely clear-eyed about what people want and what they’ll do to get it. You’re not naive enough to think this world is fair. You’re smart enough to be the one deciding who it’s fair to.

Advertisement

You are a Dwight Manfredi — someone who has served their time, paid their dues, and arrived somewhere unexpected with nothing but their reputation and their wits. You adapt without losing yourself. You build loyalty through respect rather than fear, though you’re not above reminding people that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Tulsa King is for people who are still standing when everyone assumed they’d be finished — who find, in an unfamiliar place, that they’re more capable than the world gave them credit for. You don’t need a throne. You build one, wherever you happen to land.

You carry the weight of a system that is broken by design, and you do it anyway — because someone has to, and because you’re the only one positioned to do it without the whole thing collapsing. Mike McLusky’s world is for people who are comfortable operating where there are no good options, only less catastrophic ones. You speak every language: law enforcement, criminal, political, human. That fluency makes you invaluable and it makes you a target. You’ve made your peace with both. Mayor of Kingstown belongs to people who understand that keeping the peace is not the same as being at peace — and who do the job regardless.

Advertisement

Advertisement

What’s Next for ‘Sheriff Country’?

The end of Sheriff Country’s first season is just around the corner, with its finale set for May 22. Over the next few weeks, audiences will tag along with the dutiful crew of first responders on a slew of new emergencies and, with Season 2 already receiving a green light, there’s even more where that came from in CBS’ fall block.

Watch our sneak peek of tonight’s episode of Sheriff Country above.


Advertisement
sheriff-country-poster.jpg

Advertisement


Release Date

October 17, 2025

Showrunner
Advertisement

Matt Lopez

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Star Trek’s Borg Queen Was Head Of Starfleet Medical

Published

on

Star Trek's Borg Queen Was Head Of Starfleet Medical

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Star Trek: First Contact is generally considered the best of the Next Generation movies, one that pitted Captain Picard and his erstwhile crew against their most implacable foe: the Borg. Fans love the movie, but one thing that many of them hate is the inclusion of Alice Krige’s Borg Queen. Her very existence as an individual makes no sense in a Collective where everyone shares the same hive mind. On top of that, she’s a walking time paradox, repeatedly dying onscreen only to pop up in future TV shows whenever the writers needed a cheap Big Bad reveal.

However, Star Trek’s stupidest villain was almost fixed by the franchise’s first prequel. Recently, a number of writers and producers for Star Trek: Enterprise got together for Trek Talks, a livestream telethon that helps raise money for the Hollywood Food Coalition. Together, they revealed a number of rejected episode pitches that would have electrified the fandom. Arguably, the most ambitious of these pitches would have been an origin story for the Borg Queen, one that had the potential to answer burning questions Trek fans have been debating for decades

The Borg Queen’s Origin Story

star trek borg

During the Trek Talks stream, Enterprise writers Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens revealed they wanted to “have another Borg show, but bring in the head of Starfleet Medical, which would be played by Alice Krige.” Krige, of course, played the Borg Queen in Star Trek: First Contact, and the franchise has never revealed any details about who or what she was before being assimilated. In Reeves-Stevens’ story, we would see her Starfleet Medical bigwig “choosing to join the Collective,” and they wanted the episode to explore “what goes through the mind” of a person making such an insane choice to abandon both their individuality and their humanity.

Sadly, Reeves-Stevens didn’t elaborate on their pitch beyond those details, so all we know is that this Enterprise episode would have been a Borg Queen origin story explaining how this mechanical monarch was once the human head of Starfleet Medical. Still, I can’t help but think that this episode would have made her character much more palatable to the average fan. That’s because a well-written episode could answer fans’ biggest questions about this character while more organically integrating her into Star Trek canon.

Attack Of The Drones

For example, the Borg we first saw in The Next Generation spoke with a singular hive mind, and the concept of individuality was completely alien to them. That’s what made Picard’s assimilation so shocking. Not only did these bionic baddies target everyone’s favorite captain, but they turned him into a mouthpiece for their coldhearted collective. The Enterprise episode that Reeves-Stevens pitched could explain how and why the Borg learned the value of having an individual spokesperson. Furthermore, showing Krige’s character volunteering to join these villains might offer context for why the Borg Queen in First Contact wanted Picard to surrender himself willingly rather than be assimilated against his will. 

Additionally, a Borg Queen origin story might finally help fans nail down a timeline of how and when Starfleet first learned about the Borg. In The Next Generation, Q is seemingly responsible for introducing Starfleet to this new threat by flinging the Enterprise deep into Borg territory. However, the Voyager episode “Dark Frontier” later revealed how Seven of Nine’s parents were Federation scientists eager to study the Borg, a race they mostly knew about through whispered rumors. The Enterprise episode “Regeneration” retconned things even further by revealing that Zefram Cochrane warned people about the Borg seen in First Contact, but he later recanted after his claims were dismissed as tall tales from a known drunk.

Advertisement

Resistance Is Futile (She Brought Cuffs)

star trek borg

This has led to lingering questions, like how long have Starfleet and the Federation officially known about the Borg? Unofficially, who was keeping tabs on these villains? Were shadowy figures (like Section 31) cross-referencing Cochrane’s tall tales with stories from El-Aurian refugees and Captain Archer’s own account of hostile, cybernetic beings? Right now, all of this is a mystery, one made more frustrating because it involves Star Trek’s most famous villains. Had we gotten this Enterprise episode, it might have cleared that mystery up for fans while making it easier for future writers (say, the Picard writers) to do more with the Borg Queen than have her show up and make evil speeches.

Early on Enterprise was viewed as a major letdown for Star Trek fans. But it started to get really good in its fourth and final season, and the Borg Queen pitch from Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens proves that this show still had some great stories to tell. Had we gotten this episode and more like it, Enterprise might have gone on to become one of the franchise’s most successful series. If nothing else, it could have avoided decades of fan squabbles over who and what the Borg Queen is and what she offers to the Collective beyond being (let’s face it) dommy mommy eye candy for drones and fans alike. 


Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Fire Country’ Sets Up Bode and Chloe’s Biggest Moment Yet in New Sneak Peek [Exclusive]

Published

on

‘Fire Country’ Sets Up Bode and Chloe’s Biggest Moment Yet in New Sneak Peek [Exclusive]

Crossover season is in full swing on the major networks thanks to the likes of shows like ABC’s 9-1-1 and 9-1-1: Nashville allowing its in-universe characters to intermingle with one another and explore relationships otherwise left up in the air. Last week, CBS finally gave audiences what they’d been searching for since the debut episode of Fire Country’s spin-off, Sheriff Country, debuted during the 2025 fall lineup. In an explosive installment, audiences followed along with the latter’s Boone (Matt Lauria) and the former’s Bode (Max Thieriot) as they worked together to solve a major kidnapping case that shook the universe’s town of Edgewater to its core. After cracking the case, ensuring that all the kids were returned home safely, and building their friendship along the way, this week should be a breeze for everyone involved, right?

Of course, the answer here is a resounding no. This week on Fire Country, the heat’s back on just in a different way than usual after all hell breaks loose at the Edgewater rodeo. With the good, hardworking folks of the town attempting to take some time off and enjoy a little local fun, nothing is ever quite that easy in the world of Fire Country as this week’s installment, titled “Why Not Now” will follow the chaos that ensues when a stampede of runaway horses threatens to trample all those in attendance. Ahead of tonight’s episode, we at Collider are thrilled to unveil an official first look at the madness that slows things down for this season’s most talked about potential couple.

Advertisement





















































Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Taylor Sheridan Universe Quiz
Which Taylor Sheridan
Show Do You Belong In?

Yellowstone · Landman · Tulsa King · Mayor of Kingstown

Four worlds. All of them brutal, complicated, and built on power, loyalty, and the price of survival. Taylor Sheridan doesn’t write heroes — he writes people who do what they have to do and live with the cost. Ten questions will reveal which one of his worlds you were made for.

🤠Yellowstone

🛢️Landman

👑Tulsa King

Advertisement

⚖️Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

01

Where does your power come from?
In Sheridan’s world, everyone has leverage. The question is what kind.




Advertisement

02

Who do you put first, no matter what?
Loyalty in Sheridan’s universe is always absolute — and always costly.




Advertisement

03

Someone crosses a line. How do you respond?
Every Sheridan protagonist has a line. What matters is what happens after it’s crossed.




Advertisement

04

Where do you feel most in your element?
Sheridan’s worlds are as much about place as they are about people.




Advertisement

05

How do you feel about operating in the grey?
Nobody in a Sheridan show has clean hands. The question is how they carry the dirt.




Advertisement

06

What are you actually fighting to hold onto?
Every Sheridan character is fighting a war. The real question is what they’re defending.




Advertisement

07

How do you lead?
Authority in Sheridan’s world is never given — it’s established, maintained, and constantly tested.




Advertisement

08

Someone new arrives and tries to change how things work. Your reaction?
Every Sheridan show has an outsider disrupting an established order. Sometimes that outsider is you.




Advertisement

09

What has your position cost you?
Nobody gets to where these characters are without paying for it. The bill is always personal.




Advertisement

10

When it’s over, what do you want people to say?
Sheridan’s characters all know the ending is coming. The question is what they leave behind.




Advertisement
Sheridan Has Spoken
You Belong In…

The show that claimed the most of your answers is the world you were built for. If two tied, both are shown — you’re complicated enough to straddle two Sheridan universes.

Advertisement

🤠
Yellowstone

🛢️
Landman

👑
Tulsa King

⚖️
Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

You are a Dutton — or you might as well be. You understand that some things are worth protecting at any cost, and that the modern world’s indifference to history, to land, to legacy, is not something you’re willing to accept quietly. You lead from the front, you carry your family’s weight without complaint, and when someone threatens what’s yours, you don’t escalate — you finish it. You’re not cruel. But you are absolute. In Yellowstone’s world, that combination of ferocity and loyalty doesn’t make you a villain. It makes you the only thing standing between everything that matters and everyone who wants to take it.

You thrive in the chaos of high-stakes negotiation, where the money is enormous, the margins are thin, and the wrong word in the wrong room can cost everyone everything. You’re a fixer — the person called when a situation is already on fire and needs someone with the nerve to walk into it. West Texas oil country rewards exactly what you are: sharp, adaptable, unsentimental, and absolutely clear-eyed about what people want and what they’ll do to get it. You’re not naive enough to think this world is fair. You’re smart enough to be the one deciding who it’s fair to.

Advertisement

You are a Dwight Manfredi — someone who has served their time, paid their dues, and arrived somewhere unexpected with nothing but their reputation and their wits. You adapt without losing yourself. You build loyalty through respect rather than fear, though you’re not above reminding people that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Tulsa King is for people who are still standing when everyone assumed they’d be finished — who find, in an unfamiliar place, that they’re more capable than the world gave them credit for. You don’t need a throne. You build one, wherever you happen to land.

You carry the weight of a system that is broken by design, and you do it anyway — because someone has to, and because you’re the only one positioned to do it without the whole thing collapsing. Mike McLusky’s world is for people who are comfortable operating where there are no good options, only less catastrophic ones. You speak every language: law enforcement, criminal, political, human. That fluency makes you invaluable and it makes you a target. You’ve made your peace with both. Mayor of Kingstown belongs to people who understand that keeping the peace is not the same as being at peace — and who do the job regardless.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Bode and Chloe’s Relationship Continues to Blossom

Joining the masses to celebrate the resiliency of Edgewater, Bode (Thieriot) and Chloe (Alona Tal) wear their rodeo best and stand alongside one another to take in the exciting event. From the side of the gate, the pair chat about the ongoing drama surrounding Tyler’s (Conor Sherry) impending court case, with Chloe telling her longtime friend that her son has an incredibly talkative lawyer. Pushing the worried mother to take some time for herself, Bode tells Chloe to put her phone away for the day and enjoy all the magnificent wonder that the Edgewater rodeo holds. Sparks fly as the pair look back on the childhood crushes they had on one another as the rest of the town braces themselves for what they expect to be the best day of the year.

Check out our exclusive first look at Fire Country’s new episode above and see how it all plays out tonight on CBS.


Advertisement
03185573_poster_w780.jpg

Advertisement


Release Date

October 7, 2022

Showrunner
Advertisement

Tia Napolitano

Directors

Bill Purple, Dermott Downs, Eagle Egilsson, Gonzalo Amat, Kevin Alejandro, Max Thieriot, Sarah Wayne Callies, Marie Jamora, Kantu Lentz, Antonio Negret, Laura Nisbet Peters, Lisa Demaine, Nicole Rubio, James Strong, Anton Cropper, Erica A. Watson, Joy T. Lane, Jacquie Gould, Chi-Yoon Chung

Advertisement

Writers

Tia Napolitano, David Gould, Natalia Fernandez, Barbara Kaye Friend, Tony Phelan, Joan Rater, Dwain Worrell, Julia Fontana, Sara Casey, Manuel Herrera, Jen Klein, Anupam Nigam, Tonya Kong

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

New Music Friday April 10: Lady Gaga, Doechii, Ella Langley, KATSEYE, Anitta, Shakira, Laufey and More

Published

on

New Music Friday April 10: Lady Gaga, Doechii, Ella Langley, KATSEYE, Anitta, Shakira, Laufey and More

Happy New Music Friday! The weekend is here, which means more streaming, new playlists and the best that music has to offer — and ET has you covered for everything in between.

Coachella kicks off today with headliners Sabrina Carpenter, Justin Bieber, Karol G, and Anyma. Fans can tune in via Coachella’s YouTube Channel to see seven stages featuring a lineup that includes Addison Rae, BIGBANG, BINI, Clipse, David Guetta, FKA twigs, Jack White, Kaskade, KATSEYE, Major Lazer, Laufey, The Strokes, Teddy Swims and more. The livestream will begin at 4pm PT each night.

CBS and Dick Clark Productions announced that Queen Latifah will host the 52nd American Music Awards on May 25. This will mark 30 years since her AMAs hosting debut when she was a co-host in 1995. She shared, “I am so excited to return to the American Music Awards stage to host this year. It’s been an incredible year for music and there is no better place to celebrate than in Vegas.”

Women lead nominations for the 61st Academy of Country Music Awards. Megan Moroney leads with 9 nominations, followed by Miranda Lambert with 8, Ella Langley with 7, Lainey Wilson with 7, Chris Stapleton with 6, Zach Top with 5 and Cody Johnson with 4. More performers have also been announced — Kacey Musgraves, Little Big Town and Miranda Lambert will join previously announced performers Cody Johnson, Lainey Wilson and Riley Green. The awards will stream live on May 17 on Prime Video.

Advertisement

The Latin Recording Academy announced that Daddy Yankee will be the 2026 Latin Recording Academy Person of the Year. He will be honored for his nearly three-decade career as a singer, songwriter and performer within the urban genre, as well as for his humanitarian efforts. Daddy Yankee shared, “This recognition from The Latin Recording Academy is a dream come true. It means a lot because it represents more than just a successful career; it’s recognition of years of discipline, struggle, faith and commitment to our culture.” He will be celebrated at a private gala on November 11 in Las Vegas, as part of Latin GRAMMY Week.

Lady Gaga and Doechii released their new song “Runway,” the first piece of music from The Devil Wears Prada 2. The song was written by Bruno Mars, Jaylah Hickmon, Lady Gaga, Andrew Watt, Henry Walter, Dernst “D’Mile” Emile II and Jayda Love, and produced by Bruno Mars, Andrew Watt, Cirkut and D’Mile. The song marks the first collaboration between Gaga and Doechii.

Hilary Duff has released “Come Clean (Mine),” a re-recorded version of her 2003 hit single. The track will be featured in “The Reunion: Laguna Beach” which premieres April 10 on The Roku Channel. The song will also be included on Hilary Duff – (Mine), a brand new collection of newly re-recorded renditions of Hilary’s great hits, out on April 18 exclusively for Record Store Day 2026.

16 year old country singer Maddox Batson is currently on his Live Worldwide Tour 2026 and made a stop at The Wiltern in Los Angeles this week, which was his 100th show.

Advertisement

Simone Ashley has announced her debut EP, Songs I Wrote In New York. Best known for her starring roles in “Bridgerton” and “Sex Education” and upcoming films “The Devil Wears Prada 2” and “Peaked,” Ashley reconnects with her early foundations in music. Before acting, music and performing were her earliest forms of creative expression. Simone shared, “I’ve found a confidence in knowing what kind of women and artist I want to be – that feeling really kept me company whilst in the studio writing and recording these songs.”

Plus, new music from Ella Langley, KATSEYE, Anitta, Shakira, Laufey, Snoop Dogg, Foo Fighters, DJ Khaled, Kehlani, Missy Elliott, Teddy Swims, Anyma x LISA, Marshmello, Thomas Rhett, Josh Groban, Maya Hawke, Melanie C, Cruz Beckham and more.
 

“Runway” – Lady Gaga & Doechii

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

Advertisement

Dandelion – Ella Langley

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“PINKY UP” – KATSEYE

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

Advertisement

“Come Clean (Mine)” – Hilary Duff

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Choka Choka” – Anitta & Shakira

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

Advertisement

10 Til’ Midnight – Snoop Dogg

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

“Of All People” – Foo Fighters

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

Advertisement

“One of Them” – DJ Khaled feat Futre & Lil Baby

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Back and Forth”Kehlani feat Missy Elliott

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

Advertisement

A Matter of Time: The Final Hour – Laufey

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Mr. Know It All” – Teddy Swims

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

Advertisement

“Bad Angel” – Anyma X LISA

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

“Where We Go” – Marshmello & Thomas Rhett

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

Advertisement

“waste your pain” – Cruz Beckham

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

“FREE” – Simone Ashley
Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

“As Time Goes By” – Josh Groban

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Bring Home My Man” – Maya Hawke

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Awake Tonight” – AFROJACK, David Guetta, Sia

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Attitude” – Melanie C

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

Superbloom – Jessie Ware

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“You Still Move Me” – Marie Osmond & Dan Seals

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Who Will You Follow” – Evanescence

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Already There” – Young the Giant

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

Cruel World – Holly Humberstone

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Don’t You Worry Babe” – Belle and Chain

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

SIGNALS – BINI

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Sick Of Love” – Lykke Li

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

wHIMSY! – DESTIN CONRAD
 

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Fare Thee Well” – David Nail

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“stuck” – Saint Harrison

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“God Winks (moments)” – Annie Bosko

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

KEYVITUP – KEYVITUP

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“SAME SH!T” – Isaiah Rashad

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

“Damn Good Actress” – Tiffany Stringer

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

80 Acres – 80 Acres

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

Joy Next Door – The Maine

Advertisement

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify
 

“Carrie Bradshaw” – Kylie Cantrall

Stream it now: Apple / Spotify

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

56 Years Ago, Paul McCartney Did What No One Else Would and Ended The Beatles for Good

Published

on

bearded-george-harrison-turning-to-his-right-in-george-harrison-living-in-the-material-world

Since the news of The Beatles’ break-up first officially broke in 1970, it has been framed as a definitive decision by Paul McCartney. While, yes, this is technically true, the reality was far less sudden, shaped instead by a series of cracks forming away from the spotlight. Before the public had the chance to catch on, each band member had already begun questioning their place within The Beatles.

Creative tension and the ludicrous pressures of fame pushed John Lennon, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr to briefly walk away and even threaten to leave at various stages of the late 1960s. These uncomfortable moments were, unfortunately, not just heated arguments but signals of increasingly unbearable tension. So, when McCartney made it official, the idea of The Beatles breaking up was no longer unthinkable but, perhaps, inevitable.

Advertisement

Paul McCartney Wasn’t The Only Beatles Member Who Wanted Out

Before any official break-up announcements were ever made, each of the Beatles’ members had actually walked away from the group at one stage, but always returned following their respective spats. Ringo Starr left for two weeks in the summer of 1968, but returned from his vacation with flowers on his drum kit as a peace offering that convinced him to stay. Like Ringo, George Harrison walked away from The Beatles for five days during the Get Back sessions in January 1969, when tensions were growing, and the group was being filmed for the Peter Jackson documentary. Harrison looked back at the difficulties, asking, “What’s the point of this? […] Everybody had gone through that. Ringo had left at one point. I know John wanted out. It was a very, very difficult, stressful time, and being filmed having a row as well was terrible. I got up, and I thought, ‘I’m not doing this anymore. I’m out of here.’” Harrison returned on the condition that The Beatles stop plans for live performance and that they move the recording to their new Apple basement studio.

bearded-george-harrison-turning-to-his-right-in-george-harrison-living-in-the-material-world


The Beatles Said No to This George Harrison Song — Then It Became a Classic Hit

George Harrison brought this iconic song to a Beatles rehearsal and it was rejected.

Advertisement

Months later, in September 1969, John Lennon privately shared that he wanted to quit by saying he wanted to “divorce” The Beatles. This comment felt particularly weighty, as The Beatles’ output was, arguably unfairly, dependent on the writing partnership of Lennon and McCartney. So, the breakdown of such a creatively powerful duo looked like the beginning of the end. Lennon’s strained decision also aligned with the emergence of The Plastic Ono Band, which perhaps gave Lennon a sense of creative freedom he felt The Beatles no longer provided.

Paul McCartney Finally Decided To Let The Beatles Be

Shortly after Lennon’s desire for separation, McCartney echoed the sentiment in Life Magazine. He expressed a simultaneous nostalgic longing for the old days and a need to move forward: “I would rather do what I began by doing, which is making music. We make good music and we want to go on making good music. But the Beatle thing is over. It has been exploded, partly by what we have done, and partly by other people. We are individuals—all different.” McCartney acknowledged the immense tension between a group of such musically strong individuals and hinted at a struggle between egos as well. It’s also a touch of class and reassuring self-awareness that McCartney identified the enormous pressure caused by the interference of fame and how that could affect the well-being of young men.

What seemed to be the ultimate catalyst for the break-up of The Beatles was the final few months of grappling with Apple Records, the record label founded by the band in 1968. The appointment of business manager Allen Klein was strongly resisted by McCartney, who instead favored his own father-in-law for the position. After that, McCartney refused to attend meetings, clarifying that the feeling of friendship had dwindled along with business camaraderie. By then, one could imagine it would seem like a stretch to find creative catharsis when even mundane business matters felt tedious.

Advertisement
Ringo Starr posing, peace sign


After Their Heartbreaking Split, Ringo Starr Managed to Reunite All Four Beatles on This Album

A surprising collaboration that sparked hope of a reunion.

McCartney’s official departure was covered in the Daily Mirror newspaper on April 10, 1970, as part of a self-interview. The breaking story was confirmed with McCartney’s exit statement: “I have no future plans to record or appear with the Beatles again or to write any more music with John.” In retrospect, it feels a little odd to know there was a definitive day on which the news was announced, quite a while after it had been bubbling for so long. However, it also makes total sense that McCartney was the one to do it. The other band members had already established solo projects throughout their Beatles careers (Lennon with the Plastic Ono Band, Ringo with films, and Harrison with production and solo material), so it was up to McCartney to officially close a door that was already shut. His announcement then marked the inevitability of his own eventual solo album, McCartney, the final mark of The Beatles’ dissolution.

Advertisement

In 1970, after the split, McCartney revealed that “Leaving the Beatles, or having the Beatles leave me, whichever way you look at it, was very difficult because that was my life’s job.” But there was no need for him to worry. Paul McCartney has gained 83 Grammy nominations and 19 wins, including nine with The Beatles, two with Wings, a collaboration with Nirvana, and two lifetime achievement awards. He also holds the Guinness World Record for the most No. 1 hits as a songwriter. The Beatles didn’t fall apart overnight after McCartney’s announcement, but it relieved some of the mounting pressure. By the time it was official, The Beatles had formed their own legacies, shaped their own identities, and continued to define music history in their unique ways.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Gucci Mane Disses Pooh Shiesty, Big 30 In ‘Crash Dummy’ Song

Published

on

Rihanna Seemingly Addresses Baby Rumors, Talks "Little Pouch"

Days after the arrests of Pooh Shiesty, his father, Big30 and six others, Gucci Mane is finally breaking his silence. Over the last two days, reports have confirmed that Gucci spoke with Dallas police on the evening of the incident, January 10. But die-hard Gucci fans weren’t sold on him “snitching.” But Gucci’s new diss record, ‘Crash Dummy,’ is telling it ALL.

RELATED: From A Staples Stop To Social Media Flexing, Here Are 7 WILD Allegations In Pooh Shiesty’s Kidnapping Case

Gucci Mane Pops Off On Pooh Shiesty & Big30 In ‘Crash Dummy’ 

While the internet debated how Gucci Mane would handle the criminal case against his artist, he was preparing to release ‘Crash Dummy.’ There’s no telling whether he recorded the diss record after this week’s arrests and failed bond hearing. However, he teased the track on Thursday, announcing its midnight release on April 10. The release marks exactly three months from the day he was allegedly held at gunpoint and robbed, on January 10. It’s also the first time Gucci has publicly spoken out about what happened, despite viral reports about what he told Dallas police after the alleged incident.

‘Crash Dummy’ is three minutes long, but goes in on Pooh Shiesty and Big30 from the jump. Though he doesn’t name them, here’s what he raps:

“Tell the truth, you went out like a real crash dummy / And after all that, boy you still signed to me. I’m like Birdman and n*gga, this my Cash Money /And your fat a*s flunkie, he a stone cold junkie.” 

As the verse continues, Gucci Mane gave his POV of what went down on January 10. He confirmed that he believed they had a business meeting, but “it was a setup.” Mane said they were dapping him up, but “plotting against” him the whole time. Still, he’s not taking it personal, he said. For me, it’s all business.

Advertisement

“What don’t kill you make you stronger, don’t bite the hand that feeds you. And my money keep getting longer now these haters got amnesia.”

A few seconds later, he talks about winning “stupid prizes” after playing “stupid games.” Adding that, “Some people like to take a n*gga kindness for weakness, I pulled up on business but y’all was on some weak sh*t.” Later, seemingly taking another shot at Pooh Shiesty and his dad, Lontrell Williams Sr., Gucci raps:

“You learn from ya daddy/ So I guess that it’s hereditary / I’m that same n***a who put money on your commissary.” 

Gucci Mane clarifies that “this ain’t back in the day,” and that he’s not letting anyone destroy what he built, especially his 1017 label. He then bragged about being the CEO and signing the checks! “I done been betrayed now my heart turned cold,” he raps in the chorus. In the outro, he says: “CEO. 1017 for life. Big Gucci. This for all the crash dummies out there. I don’t know what the f**k you thought. Still getting money, this ain’t that.” 

RELATED: Whew! Fans React To Clip Of 21 Savage Bumping Pooh Shiesty’s Music Amid Allegations That He Robbed Gucci Mane (WATCH)

What Do You Think Roomies?

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Natasha Lyonne returns to red carpet in first public appearance after reported removal from flight

Published

on


The actress attended a “Lorne” documentary event after reported flight drama and having walked the “Euphoria” premiere carpet in a see-through top.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

BBC investigation finds BAFTA Awards' 'highly offensive' airing of uncensored N-word 'had no editorial justification'

Published

on


The BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit reported that members of the production team “say they did not hear or recognize the N-word” during the broadcast.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025