The internet is popping off after the Alpha Kappa Alpha (AKA) Sorority Inc. explained why they cut Trick Daddy’s performance short at their 73rd regional conference. Soon after, Trick Daddy didn’t hesitate to share his POV. He basically told the sorority they should’ve known what they were getting into when they decided to pick him.

RELATED: Yikes! Social Media Goes IN On Trick Daddy After He Drops Cryptic Post About Why Men Cheat (VIDEO) 

AKA Director Explains Why They Chose To Cut Off Trick Daddy

Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority South Atlantic Regional Director Tiffany Moore Russell released a statement in response to Trick Daddy performing at their 73rd South Atlantic Regional Conference. She said the region signed a contract with Trick to perform after their Step and Stroll Competition on Friday, April 3. The sorority met with him and his team multiple times to go over rules for attire, language, and even which songs to perform. But according to them, Trick ignored the rules. They said his language, lyrics, and some of his comments crossed the line.

“I ended the performance because of the disrespect for our organization and for our brand. Our step teams represented the creativity, the discipline and excellence that make our sisterhood proud, and I regret this performance distracted from that experience,” the statement read.

@2saddity_

Still trying to figure out how this happened 😓 #fyp #trickdaddy #akaconference #trending

♬ original sound – 2saddity_

Advertisement

Trick Daddy Goes Off After AKA Director Cut His Mic

Trick Daddy came through with a response to Russell’s statement and he didn’t hold back! He hopped on a livestream to clear the air and said he was absolutely going to perform his single, ‘Jump On It.’

Trick Daddy’s performance during an Alpha Kappa Alpha conference was shut down early due to “disrespect for our organization and our brand” pic.twitter.com/AX8xsELyP4

— philip lewis (@Phil_Lewis_) April 4, 2026

From there, he made it clear he wasn’t feeling the regional director’s statement at all. He said anyone who had an issue with him or his music should’ve checked his catalog before booking him.

“Anybody that was in there sadity and was sanctified, they should not be in there once I grab that m**** f*****g mic. I ain’t ask to be there.”

Trick even said he gave them a half-priced show, so calling him out on social media felt like some shady business. He added that they cut his mic mid-performance, and he felt disrespected. So, he bounced.

“Now you done dirtied up my name. I gotta clean up my name. I gotta clear my name.” He continued, “I ain’t the m***** f*****g don’t play with me,” Trick continued.

On top of that, the rapper said he’s planning on dropping receipts in response to being called vulgar and disrespectful. He said his homegirl took video footage of the AKA girlies vibing to his music and rapping his lyrics word for word, so he doesn’t see what the problem is. “I came I gave you the real Trick Daddy. I gave you right what you paid for,” he said in his video.

Social Media Can’t Stop Talking About Trick Vs. The AKA’s

Once The Shade Room dropped the clips from Trick Daddy’s livestream, fans flooded the comment section. A lot of folks seemed to take his side saying the AKA’s should’ve known better than to expect gospel music from him.

Instagram user @martinefrancispierre wrote, “He ain’t lying 😂 y’all booked Trick Daddy not Marvin Sapp be fr.” 

Instagram user @ambernichelleee wrote, “So out of all the artists in the world y’all picked Trick Daddy and expected DECORUM ?!💀😭” 

While Instagram user @im_missp wrote, “I mean like be tf frrrr 😂😂 should’ve booked Kirk Franklin.” 

Then Instagram user @heavenblogz wrote, “I’m an AKA… and I also wanna know why Trick Daddy of all people was booked.😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣” 

Another Instagram user @keith_rondell wrote, “Trick Daddy vs. AKA was not on my bingo card for 2026 😂😂” 

Instagram user @ms.aunalia wrote, “almost everyone knows what type of music he makes 😂 like let’s not act surprised.” 

While another Instagram user @ricolaelizabeth wrote, “He ain’t wrong bc why even have Trick to perform … what did they want to hear? Thug Holiday?” 

Then another Instagram user @kweenmocha wrote, “That’s like asking Uncle Luke to perform on Hallelujah Night 😒” 

Finally, Instagram user @jus_wesm wrote, “They should’ve known better 😂😂😂😂… it’s Trick Daddy.” 

RELATED: Wayment Unc! Trick Daddy Turns Heads After Sharing Flirty Caption With Photo Of Him & GloRilla

Shiloh Jolie left fans stunned after appearing in a teaser for a music video by K-pop artist Dayoung.

Viewers couldn’t help but notice how closely the young adult resembles a 19-year-old version of her mother, Angelina Jolie, in the video titled “What’s a Girl to Do?”

Shiloh Jolie previously made headlines for dropping the name of her father, Brad Pitt, once she marked her 18th birthday; a decision that was later revealed to have left the Hollywood veteran devastated.

Shiloh Jolie’s Look In The Video Mirrored A Younger Version Of Her Mother

Recently, a K-pop artist debuted a teaser for her upcoming visuals, “What’s a Girl to Do?” in which Angelina Jolie’s daughter, Shiloh, was seen playing a video vixen.

Although Shiloh’s cameo in the teaser lasted only a few seconds, fans couldn’t help but notice how much she resembles a 19-year-old version of her mother.

What stood out most was her styling for the video. Her blonde hair was pulled into a tight, braided updo, a look her mother frequently sported in her younger years. The dancer’s makeup also enhanced the transformation, featuring a gold contour, rosy blush, and a perfect, classic smoky eye.

Meanwhile, Shiloh’s pouty lips and bright blue eyes further sealed the striking resemblance to Jolie, and further highlighted how strongly the actress’s features are reflected in her daughter.

How Fans Reacted To Shiloh Jolie’s K-Pop Music Video Debut

On social media, fans pointed out the striking resemblance in the comments sections of various posts, noting that Shiloh was her mother’s “twin” and “carbon copy.”

“Holy sh-t, mamma’s good genes are sooooo strong. Beauty in the genes,” one wrote.

“She looks exactly like her Mom,” a second user remarked. “This is literally Angelina … I’m not even kidding,” a third said.

Advertisement

“I said, ‘Who’s that girl? She looks a lot like Shiloh,’ and it’s indeed Shiloh. The Jolie genes tho. Out on April 7. Of course, we will support our baby’s baby,” a fourth user wrote.

A fifth individual noted, “So much like her little mommy that it wasn’t even necessary to say she was her daughter.”

One more wrote, “Shiloh Jolie has always physically resembled Angelina Jolie since she was little. Shiloh has 99.99% of her genes from her mother.”

Shiloh Jolie Previously Dropped Her Father’s Name

In 2024, Shiloh, for her 18th birthday, made the surprising decision to drop her father’s name from her surname.

The dancer stated in legal documents that she now wishes to be known as “Shiloh Jolie” rather than “Shiloh Jolie-Pitt.”

Advertisement

Her lawyer, Levine, later addressed Shiloh’s surprising legal move, citing “painful events.”

“The media should be more careful in their reporting,” Peter Levine told People Magazine in an exclusive, “especially when covering a young adult who has made an independent and significant decision following painful events, and is merely following legal process.”

Why The Dancer Dropped Her Father’s Name

Part of the “painful events” that led Shiloh to drop Pitt’s last name reportedly included the dancer and her siblings being prevented from testifying in the custody battle between their warring parents, a decision Shiloh is said to have blamed on her father.

“The name change goes back to the custody battle, and Shiloh’s belief that her rights as a victim were violated,” an insider told the Daily Mail.

They added, “Shiloh believed she had the right, as a victim of crime, to testify — and was prevented from doing so.”

Advertisement

Brad Pitt Was Devastated By Shiloh’s Name Change Decision

At the time news of the name change emerged, sources revealed that Pitt had “virtually no contact” with Shiloh and his older kids, Maddox, Pax, and Zahara, whom he also shares with Jolie.

It was also noted that he was devastated by the decision after he became aware of it.

“Brad was devastated by this choice,” a source told Us Weekly at the time. “To him, it was more than a change of name — it was a symbol of a deeper estrangement that has been brewing for years.”

Pitt’s youngest child, Vivienne, and older daughter, Zahara, have also stopped associating with his name.

A source later shared that the kids have “struggled to forgive and connect” with Pitt since the acrimonious split from Jolie several years ago.

Advertisement

“Their mom is the head of the household, and she’s raised them with love and selflessness their whole lives. Once Brad left, it was very hard for them to see him go to war with her,” said the insider.

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 18 seconds ago

If you’re a Star Trek fan, chances are that you watch Red Letter Media, the channel that deconstructs the worst films in the funniest possible ways. RLM cohosts Mike Stoklassa and Rich Evans are huge fans of Gene Roddenberry’s sci-fi franchise, and they talk about it onscreen whenever they can. Most recently, the two released a video where they reviewed the first season of Star Trek: Voyager, a show that both of them enjoyed much more upon rewatch.

While the video primarily focused on the adventures of Captain Janeway and her crew, Stoklassa admitted something shocking: that he is connected with an insider who claims that Starfleet Academy only received 400,000 views. That’s not per episode, but for the entirety of Season 1.

Stoklassa hasn’t revealed his source, so it’s worth taking his claim with a grain of salt. But if he’s right, these low-view numbers reveal something sobering: Starfleet Academy’s biggest haters are right, and this now-canceled show was deeply, deeply unpopular.

The Front Lines Of A Culture War

As I have written about before, Star Trek was dragged into the culture war with the release of Discovery. That divisive rhetoric had an unintended side effect: from that point on, any attack on any NuTrek show could be dismissed as bigotry. If you had genuine problems with the portrayal of Michael Burnham (the teary-eyed Mary Sue who was inexplicably raised by Vulcans), for example, you’d get accused of being someone who screams because they saw a Black woman onscreen.

The same thing happened with Starfleet Academy when it was released earlier this year. Fans hated the show for a variety of reasons. Those included vulgar humor, profanity-laden Zoomer speech, and the mishandling of classic Trek lore.

However, because Starfleet Academy had some markers of diversity (like a same-sex faculty couple, a bisexual disaster, and a gay Klingon in a skirt), defenders of the series tried to paint all of its critics as bigots who hated the show for how woke it is. But if RLM’s insider source is correct, Starfleet Academy’s haters have been proven right: relatively speaking, nobody was watching the show at all, and most of those defenders may not even be real people.

The Power Of Math

The first season of Starfleet Academy only had 10 episodes. If Mike Stoklassa’s information is correct, it means that each episode averaged only 40,000 views. Worse, it means it’s likely that far fewer than 40,000 actually watched the entire series from beginning to end.

There is no way to verify Stoklassa’s claim, but it would explain why Starfleet Academy was canceled after Season 1. The cast had already wrapped filming on Season 2, and it’s unusual to cancel the show so far before the new season, which had already been completed, premiered. However, if Paramount knew that Season 1 had less than half a million total views while costing reportedly $10 million per episode, the network would know for certain that there was no way a second season could ever recover enough to justify throwing more money at a failing show. 

Great Call By The Haters

In thinking about all this, I keep thinking about one of my favorite copypastas: “The haters said I couldn’t do it. And they were correct. Honestly, great call from the haters.” Starfleet Academy has had haters dunking on this show from the beginning, claiming it’s something nobody really wants to watch.

Now, the show’s cancellation, along with Mike Stoklassa’s alleged insider info, proves that the haters were right: the show didn’t die because it was woke. It died because nobody was watching.

Some animated movies don’t just win people over once. They keep doing it every time they land somewhere new. The Wild Robot has had that kind of run. It was already one of the most warmly received animated films of its release year, and now Peacock is getting to enjoy the long tail of that success.

The film has stayed visible in Peacock’s movie rankings, which is impressive this deep into its streaming life. Even where its exact placement shifts, it’s clearly still one of the service’s stronger family and animation performers, which speaks to how broadly it connects. The voice cast includes Lupita Nyong’o, Pedro Pascal, Kit Connor, Catherine O’Hara, and Bill Nighy. It’s emotional, visually rich, and just the kind of movie parents and kids can keep replaying together. That’s how real streaming legs get built, and The Wild Robot clearly has them.

Related

Remembering the Icons of Film — Collider Movie Quiz

We pay tribute to the talents who helped define Hollywood.

Advertisement

Is ‘The Wild Robot’ Worth Watching?

Collider’s review stated that The Wild Robot is a breathtaking, emotionally overwhelming triumph — a visually stunning animated film that cements Chris Sanders as one of the great storytellers in modern animation. The review praised Nyong’o’s nuanced vocal performance, noting how she avoids a cold, robotic delivery and instead infuses Roz with warmth and vulnerability. Pascal balances sharp humor with emotional depth, and Connor brings charm to Brightbill’s coming-of-age arc.

“At the movie’s core are the important messages that we determine our own identities, and that family can be found in all sorts of unexpected places and people. Furthermore, there’s a nice moment in which what makes Brightbill different actually becomes his strength. All in all, The Wild Robot is an incredibly impressive feat of both animation and storytelling, and Chris Sanders has another delightful feather in his ever-brimming cap. A remarkable achievement that proves that animated movies are deserving of elite cinematic status, this Dreamworks gem is sure to become an instant classic, proving once and for all that parenting takes a village, and sometimes a jaded, loving possum.”

The Wild Robot is streaming now.

Advertisement

Release Date

Advertisement

September 12, 2024

Runtime

102 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Chris Sanders

Writers

Advertisement

Chris Sanders, Peter Brown

Producers

Jeff Hermann

Advertisement

Advertisement

• 
• 

  Lupita Nyong’o

  Roz / Rummage (voice)

  Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

By Jonathan Klotz
| Published 2 minutes ago

Stephen King can pull a horror story out of anything. At one point in the book Faithful, where King and his friend Stewart O’Nan chronicle the 2004 Boston Red Sox season, he casually drops a potential horror plot based on watching a baseball game on TV. That it took him decades to develop a story based on a haunted house makes sense; it’s too obvious.

The 2003 miniseries Rose Red is his take on the classic horror setting, which embraces all the old tropes instead of The Overlook Hotel subverting them. King fans wouldn’t have that if not for Steven Spielberg outright asking the Master of Horror to write a story about a haunted house. 

A Classic Haunted House Story From The Twisted Mind Of Stephen King

The Stephen/Steven connection had been simmering for years when they finally teamed up in 1996 and started hammering out the script for Rose Red. Originally, it was going to be a feature film, and as King has discussed in interviews over the last 30 years, the project fell apart when Spielberg wanted to take the script in a more upbeat, positive direction, and King wanted it to be a terrifying horror movie. Simple creative differences kept the movie from ever happening, but the idea was out there, and through Spielberg’s simple suggestion, King had his haunted house script. 

Rose Red was broken down and rewritten into a miniseries, airing on ABC over the course of three days in January 2002, which is what television events were like back before streaming. The Rose Red of the title isn’t a person, it’s a mansion, think of the Winchester Mystery House if it were built on a large Native American burial ground. A professor specializing in psychic phenomena, Dr. Joyce Reardon (Last Man Standing’s Nancy Travis), assembled a team of academics and psychics (which includes the late Julian Sands, Yellowjackets’ Melanie Lynskey, and Bones herself, Emily Deschanel) to venture into Rose Red and unravel the mystery. 

Over the course of the three episodes, we learn the hidden history of Rose Red, and in typical King fashion, its true nature is revealed because nothing can be only a haunted house, or only a killer clown, there’s more to it than what it seems on the surface. The different investigators all have their own special powers, from talking to ghosts to telekinesis, but that’s little comfort when going up against a cursed building that’s been haunting a family for generations. Watching the ways various members of the investigation die, from encounters with spirits to literally dying of fright, it makes you wonder how Steven Spielberg envisioned the original project. 

The World Is Still Waiting For the Steven And Stephen Collaboration

Though it was considered middling by critics of the time, Rose Red pulled off an 8.5 rating and nearly 20 million viewers. It’s often overlooked today as it’s not the greatest King adaptation, but it’s also not the worst. It’s somewhere in that huge stretch alongside Sleepwalkers, IT: Part 2, and Doctor Sleep. 

To this day, Stephen King and Steven Spielberg have yet to collaborate on a project together. They were close, again, when the Duffer Brothers were going to adapt The Talisman for Netflix. Spielberg happens to own the film rights to King’s series thanks to a sweetheart deal with Universal dating back to 1982. That deal has seemingly fallen through, with everyone involved moving on to other projects, but that’s what happened with Rose Red 30 years ago.

 It could still happen, but for now, Ready Player One’s extended homage to The Shining is as close as we’re going to get. King’s next projects include a Cujo remake, while Spielberg is getting ready to rule the Summer of ‘26 with the alien blockbuster Disclosure Day.

Rose Red is available to stream on Hulu.

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are reportedly moving closer to their wedding, but planning the big day hasn’t been easy.

With a tight summer timeline before Kelce returns to the Kansas City Chiefs, the couple is feeling the pressure.

While Taylor Swift is excited, insiders say the scale, leaks, and logistics have left the pop superstar feeling overwhelmed, to the point of even reconsidering parts of the plan.

Taylor Swift Facing Sleepless Nights Over Wedding Logistics Amid Travis Kelce’s Busy Schedule

Swift and Kelce may be heading toward the altar soon, but behind the excitement, wedding planning is reportedly becoming overwhelming.

Sources told a news outlet that the couple is aiming for a summer ceremony, potentially before Kelce returns to training camp with the Kansas City Chiefs later in July.

That tight window has reportedly created added pressure, especially as Kelce has made it clear on his “New Heights” podcast that he intends to play another NFL season, hoping to secure one more Super Bowl run.

While the “Fate of Ophelia” singer  is said to be thrilled about the upcoming wedding, insiders claim “the logistics of it all are causing a ton of stress.”

Known for being detail-oriented and private, Swift is reportedly “rattled” by how much information about their plans has already surfaced.

At one point, she even “floated the idea of changing their plans completely to throw everything off and avoid having it turn into a circus.”

However, the insider noted that adjusting plans isn’t easy given their demanding schedules. Kelce’s football commitments also leave little flexibility, which could also affect their honeymoon timeline.

Taylor Swift Takes The Lead On Wedding Planning As Travis Kelce Supports Her Vision

Despite the challenges, the couple remains supportive of each other’s careers. Kelce recently shared on “The Pat McAfee Show” that their mutual passion for their respective paths is something they deeply understand and respect in one another.

As for the wedding itself, insiders suggest it may take place in Rhode Island, near Swift’s home, potentially at the upscale Ocean House, a historic seaside resort known for its ocean views and elegant setting.

Planning, however, has largely fallen on Swift, who reportedly has a clear vision for how she wants everything to look and feel.

Advertisement

“Travis handed off most of the planning to Taylor because she has a real vision of what she wants,” a source said, per the National Enquirer. “The downside of that is she’s getting very overwhelmed, to the point she’s having sleepless nights as a result.”

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce’s Wedding To Be Split Between Rhode Island Estate And Resort

The celebration itself is expected to be split between Swift’s Rhode Island estate and the nearby resort, especially as the guest list has grown.

Even so, nothing is completely locked in. “Taylor always has a plan B and C,” one insider told Us Weekly, emphasizing her need to stay prepared.

Another insider added that Rhode Island offers the level of privacy and security the couple wants for their big day.

Finalizing the guest list hasn’t been entirely straightforward. Around 150 attendees are expected, not overly large, but still filled with familiar faces.

More On The Power Couple’s Guest List For Their Big Day

Swift is said to be inviting close friends like Selena Gomez, Gigi Hadid, Emma Stone, Haim, and Zoë Kravitz.

Meanwhile, Kelce is expected to include longtime teammate Patrick Mahomes, actor Miles Teller, and his brother, Jason Kelce.

Sources say the couple debated between hosting a massive celebration or something more low-key, ultimately choosing a more intimate approach.

Formal invitations may not even be sent out, but those closest to them are already aware of the time and place.

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce’s Wedding Will Reportedly Follow Intimate Traditions

The ceremony itself is expected to follow a traditional format. Swift’s father will walk her down the aisle, with classic moments like “father-daughter and mother-son dances” included.

Known for valuing sentiment, Swift reportedly wants the day to feel deeply personal, something Kelce fully supports. The NFL star previously shared that he became emotional while proposing with a custom-designed old mine-cut diamond engagement ring in his backyard in Lee’s Summit, Missouri, admitting there were “a few tears” during the moment.

Meanwhile, rather than having a formal bridal party, Swift is said to be keeping things relaxed. She reportedly plans to spend the night before the wedding with close girlfriends, like Selena and Gigi, at her Rhode Island home, turning it into a sleepover-style gathering. A bachelorette trip is also reportedly in the works with her inner circle.

By TeeJay Small
| Published 15 seconds ago

These days, it feels like the pervasive media environment is so fundamental that there’s no escaping spoilers, trailers, teasers, and promotional posters. Unless you’re intentionally shielding yourself from learning anything about a new release, movies will effectively become spoiled within hours of hitting the theater. Still, sometimes you uncover a hidden gem that catches you at just the right moment, allowing you to fully enjoy a project before it hits the mainstream. This was the case for me back in 2022, when I first saw Barbarian.

For those not in the know, Barbarian is a horror thriller that released in September of 2022. The film was written and directed by Zach Cregger, serving as his feature film debut. Before releasing Barbarian and his latest film, Weapons, Cregger was best known for being part of the comedy ensemble The Whitest Kids U’ Know, alongside the late, great Trevor Moore. If you haven’t seen Barbarian yet, that should be the absolute maximum amount of information you know about the movie going in.

Avoid All Barbarian Spoilers, I Will

I normally feel like spoilers don’t matter, because a truly good story can still offer exciting twists and turns even if you ultimately know where you’re heading. But Barbarian has such an unusual pace and unconventional plot that I think you’d really be doing yourself a disservice to look up anything about the movie beforehand. Critics and audiences seem to agree, since I rarely see spoilers for this film posted online today, nearly 4 years after release, even though Barbarian has become a major cult hit.

If you’re really going to twist my arm about it, I can tell you the following information about the plot. Barbarian centers on a young woman named Tess (Georgina Campbell) who unknowingly rents an Airbnb in the most blown-out neighborhood you’ve ever seen in your life. When she shows up, a mysterious man is occupying the unit, leaving her unsure if there was a clerical error on the part of the homeowner or if this man is a creep with foul intentions. With no other last-minute accommodations available, Tess enters the home and ultimately uncovers some of the most terrifying stuff I’ve ever seen committed to the screen.

A Jaw-Dropping Film

I watched most of Barbarian with my mouth agape. The film manages to balance surreal horror, impeccable character work, and a dash of laugh-out-loud humor, which made Zach Cregger a must-follow filmmaker in my book. There seems to be a real sketch-comedy-legend to acclaimed-horror-filmmakers pipeline, with Cregger joining the ranks of esteemed directors like Jordan Peele and Bill Hader.

Up until very recently, Barbarian was streaming on Hulu. The film has been a go-to watch for me any time I have friends over, because it always gets a priceless series of horrified reactions. Unfortunately, it’s not currently streaming on any of the major streamers, unless you’ve got a subscription to fuboTV (who does?) or want to pay high fees to buy it on Amazon.

As much as I’d love to get Barbarian back on Hulu or HBO, I’d say this one is well worth purchasing and owning. If you get the chance to check it out soon, definitely don’t miss the opportunity, and be sure to discourage anyone in your group from doing a cursory Google before you sit down to watch.

There are some rom-coms that never really age out of people’s comfort-watch rotation. Overboard is one of them. Nearly four decades later, the Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn comedy is still the kind of movie viewers stumble across, press play on, and end up watching all the way through. That’s exactly what seems to be happening again on Prime Video.

The film has worked its way into Prime Video’s U.S. movie top 10, which is a pretty impressive run for a 1987 romantic comedy. But honestly, it tracks. Real-life chemistry like Russell and Hawn’s doesn’t go out of style, and neither does a movie that knows exactly how charming it is. The cast includes Hawn as Joanna and Russell as Dean. It’s a weird movie, a sweet movie, and a very ’80s movie, but it still works because the central duo are so much fun together. Prime Video viewers are clearly rediscovering that all over again.

Related

Remembering the Icons of Film — Collider Movie Quiz

We pay tribute to the talents who helped define Hollywood.

Advertisement

Is ‘Overboard’ Worth Watching?

Roger Ebert’s review stated that Overboard is built on a very old and very familiar story, but it still works because it is funny, charming, and full of energy. The movie follows a spoiled rich woman who is forced to live a much harder life, and almost every big turn can be seen coming well ahead of time. Still, the film knows exactly what kind of crowd-pleaser it wants to be. What helps Overboard stand out is the little stuff. The review points to the many small comic moments, the warmth of the cast, and the easy rhythm of the direction. It is not trying to reinvent anything. It is just trying to be funny and lovable, and for the most part, it succeeds.

“If the ending of Overboard is reminiscent of The African Queen, maybe that’s because the whole movie owes something to the Humphrey Bogart-Katharine Hepburn relationship, in which a rude and crude man is civilized by a real lady. In Overboard, that development is crossbred with the heartless bitch who is civilized by a real gentleman. It’s kind of a nice process, and it makes a warm and funny movie.”

Overboard is streaming now.

Advertisement

Release Date

Advertisement

December 16, 1987

Runtime

112 minutes

Advertisement

Advertisement

• 

  Joanna Stayton / Annie Proffitt

• 
• 

  Edward Herrmann

  Grant Stayton III

  Advertisement
• 

Advertisement

Advertisement