Connect with us

Entertainment

The 10 Best Sci-Fi Films of the 2020s So Far, Ranked

Published

on

So far, the 2020s have seen the release of several absolutely exceptional science fiction movies. This is a genre that, since the very birth of cinema as a storytelling medium, has been delivering banger after banger every single decade—and what a time to be alive as a sci-fi fan this is, because the last six years have given us several movies bound to be remembered as some of the genre’s biggest classics a few decades from now.

Whether it’s a superhero blockbuster like Superman or an award-winning independent extravaganza like Everything Everywhere All At Once, the best sci-fi films of the 2020s so far are all incredibly creative, incredibly entertaining, and perfectly-understanding of everything that has made fans of this genre tick for decades.

Advertisement

10

‘Superman’ (2025)

For years, DC had been lagging behind Marvel in their efforts to craft a cinematic universe as successful as the MCU. Now, it has become James Gunn and Peter Safran‘s responsibility to catch up. And Superman being the franchise’s first-ever feature film, the future is already looking bright for this incredibly exciting superhero blockbuster franchise.

Some genre purists are generally against considering comic book and superhero movies as true sci-fi films, but the elements are all there for Superman to be counted as one, from space travel to high-tech elements. Furthermore, it’s far and away one of the best superhero movies released since 2010, an immensely entertaining and technically admirable adventure that all fans of the titular character should find perfectly satisfying.

9

‘The Mitchells vs. the Machines’ (2021)

Every member of the Mitchell family looks alarmed as robots pursue their car in 'The Mitchells vs. the Machines'.
Every member of the Mitchell family looks alarmed as robots pursue their car in The Mitchells vs. the Machines.
Image via Netflix
Advertisement

Kids and families deserve great sci-fi movies, too; and thankfully, the 2020s have thus far offered many great animated sci-fi spectacles for the little ones of the family to enjoy. Case in point: Netflix’s The Mitchells vs. the Machines, easily one of the best animated movies of the last six years. Full of vibrant energy and with some consistently jaw-dropping animation, it really is a must-see for all those who love modern animated films.

Mitchells is one of the most near-perfect sci-fi movies of the last six years, as well as one of this decade’s best family flicks. With an absurdist sense of humor that should be able to get anyone to cackle regardless of their age, a star-studded voice cast, a deeply emotional story about the beauty of the chaos of family and growing up, and some comments on AI that have aged all too well, it’s one of Netflix’s most memorable animated movies to date.

8

‘The Wild Robot’ (2024)

Roz holding Brightbill in her hand in The Wild Robot
Roz holding Brightbill in her hand in The Wild Robot
Image via DreamWorks Animation
Advertisement

Further evidence that families and kids who love science fiction have had the material to have the time of their lives throughout the last six years, The Wild Robot is proof that when they put their minds to it, DreamWorks Animation are still perfectly capable of delivering future animated classics. Based on the 2016 children’s novel by Peter Brown, this is one of the studio’s best works to date.

Wild Robot is also one of the best family movies released since 2010, a beautiful love letter to motherhood, the beauties of connection, and the importance of loving and respecting nature. Colorful and perfectly paced for all the kiddos to enjoy, but also surprisingly mature and thoughtful so that adults can’t take their eyes off of the screen either, it’s a testament to how incredible animated cinema has been throughout the 2020s.

7

‘Palm Springs’ (2020)

Nyles and Sara handcuffed and sitting in the middle of a desert road in Palm Springs (2020).
Nyles and Sara handcuffed and sitting in the middle of a desert road in Palm Springs (2020).
Image via Hulu
Advertisement

While it definitely isn’t what it used to be, the romantic comedy genre is most definitely not dead in the 2020s, and there are plenty of great modern rom-coms to prove that. Case in point: Palm Springs, one of the best, sweetest, and funniest films to have come out during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Anchored by stars Andy Sambers and Cristin Millioti at their very best, it’s a Groundhog Day-style timeloop film unlike anything else the subgenre has ever delivered.

Indeed, Palm Springs wears its influences on its sleeve, but the variety of uniquely charming things it does with its premise feels like entirely its own. Its romantic elements are indeed quite beautiful, its comedy elements are indeed absolutely hilarious, and the way it employs sci-fi elements to tell its story about existential dread and the importance of human connection in breaking out of it is phenomenal.

6

‘Godzilla Minus One’ (2023)

The titular monster towering over a cityscape in Godzilla Minus One (2023)
The titular monster towering over a cityscape in Godzilla Minus One (2023)
Image via Toho
Advertisement

The Godzilla franchise has come an undeniably long way since its 1950s days, but with Godzilla Minus One, the series has returned to its thematic roots of nuclear paranoia, critiques of government incompetence, and celebration of the importance of community. Add to that a riveting study of the nature of heroism, and you get one of the most thematically complex kaiju movies to date.

But on top of being intellectually strong, Godzilla Minus One is also arguably the most entertaining Godzilla film since the 1954 original. The writing is exceptional, the production values are surprisingly solid considering the movie’s relatively modest budget, and the titular cinematic icon is used in absolutely perfect ways. All in all, this is undoubtedly one of the best sci-fi movies of the last six years.



















































Advertisement

Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Survival Quiz
Which Sci-Fi World Would You Survive?
The Matrix · Mad Max · Blade Runner · Dune · Star Wars

Five universes. Five completely different ways the future went wrong — or sideways, or up in flames. Only one of them is the world your instincts were built for. Eight questions will figure out which dystopia, galaxy, or desert wasteland you’d actually make it out of alive.

💊The Matrix

Advertisement

🔥Mad Max

🌧️Blade Runner

🏜️Dune

🚀Star Wars

Advertisement

01

Advertisement

You sense something is deeply wrong with the world around you. What do you do?
The first instinct is often the truest one.





02

Advertisement

In a world of scarcity, what resource do you guard most fiercely?
What we protect reveals what we believe survival actually requires.





03

Advertisement

What kind of threat keeps you up at night?
Fear is useful data — if you’re honest about what you’re actually afraid of.





04

Advertisement

How do you deal with authority you don’t trust?
Every dystopia has a power structure. Your approach to it determines everything.





05

Advertisement

Which environment could you actually endure long-term?
Survival isn’t just tactical — it’s physical, psychological, and very much about where you are.





06

Advertisement

Who do you want in your corner when things fall apart?
The company you keep is the clearest signal of who you actually are.





07

Advertisement

Where do you draw the line — if you draw one at all?
Every survivor eventually faces a moment that tests what they’re actually made of.





08

Advertisement

What would actually make survival worth it?
Staying alive is one thing. Having a reason to is another.





Your Fate Has Been Calculated
You’d Survive In…
Advertisement

Your answers point to the world your instincts were built for. This is the universe your temperament, your survival instincts, and your particular brand of stubbornness were made for.


The Resistance, Zion

Advertisement
The Matrix

You took the red pill a long time ago — probably before anyone offered it to you. You’re a systems thinker who can’t help but notice the seams in things.

  • You’re drawn to understanding how the system works before figuring out how to break it.
  • You’d find the Resistance, or it would find you — your instinct for spotting constructed realities is the machines’ worst nightmare.
  • You function best when you have access to information and the freedom to act on it.
  • The Matrix built an airtight prison. You’d be the one probing the walls for the door.


The Wasteland

Advertisement
Mad Max

The wasteland doesn’t reward the clever or the well-connected — it rewards those who are hard to kill and harder to break. That’s you.

  • You don’t need comfort, community, or a cause larger than the next horizon.
  • You need a vehicle, a clear threat, and enough fuel to outrun it — and you’re good at all three.
  • You are unsentimental enough to survive that world, and decent enough — just barely — to be something more than another raider.
  • In the wasteland, that distinction is everything.


Los Angeles, 2049

Advertisement
Blade Runner

You’d survive here because you know how to exist in moral grey areas without losing yourself completely.

  • You read people accurately, keep your circle small, and ask the questions others prefer not to answer.
  • In a city where humanity is a legal designation rather than a feeling, you hold onto something that keeps you functional.
  • You’re not a hero. But you’re not lost, either.
  • In Blade Runner’s world, that distinction is everything.


Arrakis

Advertisement
Dune

Arrakis is the most hostile environment in the known universe — and you are precisely the kind of person it rewards.

  • Patience, discipline, and political awareness are your core strengths — and on Arrakis, they’re survival tools.
  • You understand that the long game matters more than any single victory.
  • Others come to Dune and are consumed by it. You’d learn its logic and earn its respect.
  • In time, you wouldn’t just survive Arrakis — you’d begin to reshape it.


A Galaxy Far, Far Away

Advertisement
Star Wars

The galaxy far, far away is vast, loud, and in a constant state of violent political upheaval — and you wouldn’t have it any other way.

  • You find meaning in being part of something larger than yourself — a cause, a crew, a rebellion.
  • You’d gravitate toward the Rebellion, or the fringes, or whatever pocket of the galaxy still believes the Empire’s grip can be broken.
  • You fight — not because you have to, but because standing aside isn’t something you’re capable of.
  • In Star Wars, that willingness is what makes all the difference.

Advertisement

5

‘Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie’ (2025)

Matt Johnson in front of a whiteboard in an RV in 'Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie' Image via NEON

Few 21st-century sci-fi movies are truly perfect, and it’s ridiculously admirable that one of those films is a small-budget time travel comedy made by two guys with nothing but a dream, an RV, and a downright-perfect understanding of copyright laws and fair use practices. Matt Johnson‘s Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie, starring him and Jay McCarrol, is a legacy sequel to a show that was itself a legacy sequel to Johnson and McCarrol’s 2007 web series, and the last 26 years have thus far seen very few movies that are funnier.

Advertisement

Part homage to time travel cinema as a whole and part hilarious parody of Back to the Future, Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie is Canadian filmmaking at its most audacious. Full of elaborate guerrilla-filmmaking-style gags and clever man-on-the-street moments that should be enough to have anyone questioning how the hell they got away with any of that, it’s a must-see underappreciated gem that’s bound to go down in history as a timeless comedy cult classic.

4

‘Project Hail Mary’ (2026)

Ryan Gosling as Ryland Grace in Project Hail Mary
Ryan Gosling as Ryland Grace in Project Hail Mary
Image via Amazon MGM

Andy Weir is one of today’s bona fide masters of hard science fiction literature, and as such, it’s no surprise that his Project Hail Mary is one of the best sci-fi books of the 2020s so far. It was no surprise, either, that a movie adaptation didn’t take long to materialize; nor was it a surprise that it ended up being one of the best hard sci-fi films of the entire 21st century so far.

Advertisement

Indeed, Project Hail Mary is an absolute blast of a blockbuster, a love letter to old-school sci-fi filmmaking full of stunning visuals, exceptional performances, emotional story beats, and unforgettable set pieces. With a perfect balance between scientific rigor to keep hard sci-fi fans happy, and a focus on emotional character work to satisfy those who aren’t necessarily sci-fi veterans, it really is one of the genre’s biggest must-see films from the last six years.

3

‘Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse’ (2023)

Miles Morales in Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse
Miles Morales in Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse
Imge via Sony Pictures Animation

Not only is Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse arguably the best animated film from the 2020s so far: It’s one of the greatest films of the last six years, period. It is, after all, the highest-rated movie of the decade on both Letterboxd and IMDb, and it will take something truly special to overtake it. Expectations were sky-high after the incredible movie that was Into the Spider-Verse, and it’s truly commendable that Across the Spider-Verse somehow managed to exceed them all.

Advertisement

For one, this may very well be the single most visually stunning Hollywood blockbuster of the century, full of some of the most staggeringly detailed, colorful, and intricate animation the big screen has ever seen. Add to that an impeccably-written story that studies the Spider-Man mythos as a whole, an exceptional score by Daniel Pemberton, and relentlessly fun pacing that makes the movie’s 140-minute runtime fly right by in a flash, and you get a masterpiece for the ages.

2

‘Everything Everywhere All At Once’ (2022)

Ke Huy Quan in an alley at night in Everything Everywhere All at Once Image via A24

Many great science fantasy movies have come out since 2020, none of them better than Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert‘s Everything Everywhere All At Once. Every year sees at least a few indie hits come out of nowhere and take the world by storm throughout awards season, but rarely had cinephiles seen a success story quite like that of the seven-Academy-Awards-winner Everything Everywhere.

Advertisement

Like all of history’s best science fantasy flicks, this one is a genre-blending delight that also throws in elements of absurdist comedy, existentialist drama, and middle-age romance. That chaos works wonderfully, the Daniels’ perfectly-calculated direction allowing the film to feel like one of the most exquisitely over-the-top sci-fi action films of the last few years rather than a pure genre mess.

1

‘Dune: Part Two’ (2024)

The Fremen ride the Sandworm into battle in Dune: Part Two (2024).
The Fremen ride the Sandworm into battle in Dune: Part Two (2024).
Image via Warner Bros. Pictures

As exceptional as Denis Villeneuve‘s Dune from 2021 was, there is virtually no denying that Dune: Part Two is by far one of the best movie sequels of the 2020s so far. Already one of the most beloved sci-fi movies of the 21st century, this adaptation of the second half of Frank Herbert‘s eponymous literary juggernaut is somewhat akin to this generation’s The Empire Strikes Back.

Advertisement

Dark in tone yet incredibly entertaining, epic in scale but deeply intimate and character-driven in scope, and populated with some of the most striking sci-fi set pieces the big screen has seen in many years, this action-adventure epic is a must-see even for those unfamiliar with the source material. Exciting, visually stunning, bolstered by Hans Zimmer‘s amazing score, and elevated by Villeneuve’s downright-faultless direction, it really is the best sci-fi film of the 2020s so far. It will take something huge to top it.


01644435_poster_w780.jpg
Advertisement


Dune: Part Two

Advertisement

Release Date

February 27, 2024

Runtime
Advertisement

167 minutes

Director

Denis Villeneuve

Advertisement

Writers

Denis Villeneuve, Jon Spaihts, Frank Herbert

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

Steve Ellis, the voice of Everlasting Love, dies aged 76 after a career that began at 15

Published

on

steve ellis

Steve Ellis, the singer whose voice carried Love Affair’s Everlasting Love to the top of the UK charts, has died at the age of 76. An announcement on his official social media accounts said he “peacefully left the world” on the evening of Friday 30 October, surrounded by loved ones, following complications from a chronic illness.

A teenage singer with a hit for the ages

Born in Edgware, north-west London, in 1950, Ellis was a teenager when he started his first group, the Soul Survivors, at 15. His musical education came partly from home, where his mother bought him Ray Charles records, and partly from the stage. Seeing James Brown perform live was a turning point. “He blew our socks off, he was phenomenal. I thought, that’s how a singer has to be, so I started doing gymnastics,” Ellis told the Express in 2021.

The group reportedly cut its teeth at weddings, youth clubs and bar mitzvahs, sometimes pretending to have been booked. As it grew it graduated to soul clubs in cities such as Manchester and Stoke. By the mid-1960s it had become Love Affair, with Rex Brayley, Mick Jackson, Lynton Guest and Maurice Bacon alongside Ellis, and had signed to Decca.

The start was rocky. Debut single She Smiled Sweetly, a cover released within weeks of the Rolling Stones’ own version, flopped. The follow-up, another cover, changed everything. Everlasting Love had been recorded earlier by the American singer Robert Knight, but Ellis’s version, reportedly sung when he was 17 and squeezed in between shifts on a building site, spent two weeks at number one in the UK.

Advertisement

The sources differ on exactly when the song hit the top. The Guardian places its chart-topping run in 1968, while the Independent and the Standard point to 1967. All agree on the outcome: a record that has outlasted nearly every rival version. Carl Carlton’s take reached the US top ten in 1974, yet the Love Affair recording remains the most streamed and a fixture at weddings. It has also turned up on screen, including in Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason and Kenneth Branagh’s Belfast.

Beyond the hits, a long second act

Love Affair followed up with Rainbow Valley, which spent 11 weeks in the Top 40, then A Day Without Love and Bringing On Back the Good Times, giving them four Top 10 hits in total. But the fame came with friction. Ellis said the band wanted to move towards progressive rock, while he had “always been a soul-boy”, and that the noise of screaming fans meant the group could barely hear themselves play. He left at the end of the 1960s, according to the Independent.

He fronted other projects, including the band Ellis, whose debut album was produced by Roger Daltrey, and Widowmaker, and released solo albums such as The Last Angry Man in 1977 and Basement Days in 1983. Commercial success on the scale of Love Affair’s never returned. The Mirror reports that audiences at his university shows wanted little beyond Everlasting Love, a song he described as both a “blessing and a curse”. It also reports that he stepped away from music for a time and worked as a docker after an accident in which he broke both feet, before a friend persuaded him to start gigging again.

The final chapter was a productive one. His 2008 album Best of Days reunited him with Daltrey and began a lasting partnership with Paul Weller, who featured on two tracks, including a live acoustic Everlasting Love. Weller co-wrote and co-produced 2018’s Boom! Bang! Twang!, and the two shared a song in 2022, Just to Simplify. Ellis’s latest record, Baby Faced Assassin, came out in September and includes three more songs created with Weller.

Advertisement

Tributes from friends and fellow musicians

Weller wrote in a social media post: “God bless ya Stevie safe travels everlasting love for sure.” Blues musician Norman Beaker, who played on a track of the new album, called Ellis “a good friend and a great voice” and “a legend with the mod movement”. Kent festival company BCM Entertainments said he “always brought something special to our events”.

The Independent reports that songwriter David Courtney first announced the death before it was confirmed on Ellis’s Facebook page. The family’s message invited fans to leave memories and condolences in the comments, and signed off with the title of the song that defined him: “Everlasting Love.”

For a singer who said that having such a record at 17 had “served me very well”, it is a fitting epitaph. Steve Ellis recorded a teenage vocal that is still sung at weddings nearly six decades later, and he was making new music with one of Britain’s most respected songwriters only weeks before he died.

Related reading:
Advertisement
Sources:

File photo: Steve Ellis performing in 2022.jpg by Spartacus103uk, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kennedy Center Honors 2026: Five Icons Named for Dec. 7 Gala Held Off-Site for the First Time

Published

on

kennedy center honors

The Kennedy Center Honors named its 49th class on Monday: singer-songwriter Paul Anka, composer David Foster, actor Andy Garcia, playwright David Mamet and country singer Barbara Mandrell. The December 7 gala will be the first held away from the Kennedy Center itself, at Washington’s Capital One Arena.

The lineup spans pop, Broadway, film, theater and country. The announcement also lands in the middle of one of the most turbulent periods in the institution’s history.

Who Is Being Honored

Anka has been a hitmaker for nearly seven decades. He broke through at 15 with “Diana” in 1957, wrote “My Way” for Frank Sinatra, and composed the theme for “The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson.” He also released a new album, “Inspirations of Life and Love,” this year.

Advertisement

Foster arrives with 16 Grammy Awards, an Emmy, a Golden Globe and three Oscar nominations. Variety notes he helped launch the careers of Celine Dion and Michael Bublé. His songwriting credits include “The Prayer,” “After the Love Has Gone” and “I Have Nothing.” More recently he composed the Broadway musical “Boop!”, which is headed for a national tour.

Garcia earned an Oscar nomination for “The Godfather: Part III” and had a breakout role in “The Untouchables.” This year he wrote, directed and starred in “Diamond,” which premiered at Cannes.

Mamet won the 1984 Pulitzer Prize for “Glengarry Glen Ross” and received Oscar nominations for the screenplays of “The Verdict” and “Wag the Dog.” The Independent describes him as a known supporter of President Donald Trump.

Mandrell, a multi-instrumentalist, won the Country Music Association’s Entertainer of the Year award twice. Her hits include “Sleeping Single in a Double Bed” and “I Was Country When Country Wasn’t Cool.” She retired in 1997 and was inducted into the Country Music Hall of Fame in 2009. She is also the only woman in the Steel Guitar Hall of Fame.

Advertisement

A Ceremony Without Its Home

The move to Capital One Arena follows a fight over the building’s future. The board, which Trump chairs, voted in December 2025 to add his name to the center. In May a federal judge ruled that only Congress can rename it, and the name came down in June. After a judge blocked a second attempt in September, the board voted to close the center, citing structural deterioration.

Trump has said renovations will not proceed unless his name returns. He has also warned the complex could be “ripped down.” A federal judge ruled September 17 that the administration must give the court 30 days’ notice before any demolition or physical changes. The Independent reports the proposed project is a two-year, $257 million renovation. It also reports that Ohio Democratic Rep. Joyce Beatty has sued to challenge the closure. Members of the National Symphony Orchestra have reportedly kept rehearsing inside the shuttered building.

Open Questions for the Broadcast

Several basics are still unsettled. No host has been announced. Trump hosted last year’s show, which honored Sylvester Stallone, George Strait, Michael Crawford, Gloria Gaynor and KISS. No network has been named either. CBS aired the event from 1978, but its rights deal expired last year.

That matters because the 2025 telecast drew its smallest audience ever. The Independent puts the drop at 35 percent from the year before. Variety also points out that this year’s announcement came unusually late. Honorees are typically revealed between July and September, and this one arrived in November.

Advertisement

In a statement, Trump said the honorees are “amazing artists whose lifelong work has shaped American culture and inspired generations of audiences.” He added that the class continues “a tradition that has defined the Center for nearly 50 years.”

The artists themselves are widely admired and span genres. Whether the Kennedy Center Honors can keep its traditional prestige, without its usual venue, a confirmed broadcaster or a settled legal fight, is the larger question as December 7 approaches.

Related reading:
Sources:

File photo: John F. Kennedy Center and Watergate Complex – DC Aerial.jpg by OhanaSurf, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Advertisement

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Martha Stewart apology: Why her first statement on the homeless Halloween costume fell short

Published

on

martha stewart apology

The Martha Stewart apology that finally arrived on Sunday came only after a first attempt at damage control made matters worse. The 85-year-old lifestyle mogul admitted she had “really screwed up” by dressing as a homeless person for Halloween, a costume that drew swift condemnation online.

What happened with the costume

On Saturday, 31 October, a photo appeared on Stewart’s Instagram showing her in torn clothes with dirt smudged on her face, holding a sign that read “I AM HUNGRY HELP ME!!” The caption read: “My QVC candles are perfect for Halloween!!!” According to the Evening Standard, the image appeared to have been included by accident in a carousel of posts promoting her candle collection on the shopping channel. That detail is the outlet’s reading of events, not something Stewart has confirmed. The post has since been deleted.

Whatever the cause, the pairing of a poverty costume with a product plug was hard to ignore. Users pushed back almost immediately. “Poverty isn’t a costume,” wrote one. Another asked who Stewart expected to find the joke funny, and answered their own question with: “Billionaires?” PR specialist Molly McPherson summed up the confusion in a post of her own, asking whether the look was “insulting? Demeaning? Confusing? All of the above.”

Advertisement

A first statement that missed the mark

Stewart’s initial response on Sunday said she was “distressed” that the costume had offended people. She said it had been meant to raise awareness of homelessness and that offense was “never my intention.” She also described homelessness as one of America’s greatest ongoing crises and said she had spent significant time and effort supporting charities that tackle it.

Many readers were not persuaded. The statement defended her motives without apologising, and some critics argued that someone with her wealth has better ways to raise awareness. “You have enough money to raise awareness without turning homelessness into a Halloween costume,” one person wrote. Another suggested she could have funded a soup kitchen or donated to a women’s shelter instead.

The fuller apology

A second statement followed. “It’s hard to admit when you’ve really screwed up,” Stewart wrote. “My earlier statement didn’t go far enough. I know many people are suffering economically. Wearing a costume like I did was insensitive and not funny. I am very sorry.”

The Martha Stewart apology is notable for what it drops. The talk of awareness is gone, and so is any suggestion that the offense lay in how people reacted rather than in the costume itself. Crisis communications often turn on that distinction: an apology tends to land better when it names the harm directly than when it explains the intent behind it.

Advertisement

Why the backlash cut deep

The reaction was sharpened by the scale of the problem Stewart was seen to be mocking. The Evening Standard noted that official figures put the number of homeless people in the United States at no fewer than 770,000. Against that, a billionaire-turned-brand-mogul posing with a “hungry” sign to sell candles struck many as tone deaf.

Stewart is also a public figure with a long history of reinvention. She built a catering business in the 1970s and became a household name in the 1990s with Martha Stewart Living. She was sentenced to five months in prison in 2004 after being found guilty on charges linked to an insider trading scandal. She then rebuilt her brand through television, food products and a series with her friend Snoop Dogg. In 2015 she sold her media company for more than $350m. A reputation that survived a prison term is unlikely to be ended by a deleted Instagram post, but the episode shows how quickly a promotional misstep can turn into a public reckoning.

For now, Stewart’s message is clear, even if it took two attempts: she says the costume was a mistake, and she has said sorry.

Related reading:
Advertisement
Sources:

File photo: Martha Stewart 2011 Shankbone.JPG by David Shankbone, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Strictly triple dance-off ends Lawrence Robb’s run as fifth couple exits and 10 remain

Published

on

strictly triple dance-off

Header image: AI-generated illustration by WordUp News.

The first Strictly triple dance-off in the show’s history ended with Emmerdale actor Lawrence Robb and his professional partner Jowita Przystal leaving the competition on Sunday, after the judges voted them out.

Robb and Przystal landed in the bottom three alongside House of the Dragon actress Bethany Antonia and partner Nancy Xu, and actress Jaime Winstone and partner Carlos Gu. All three couples had ended up there through the combination of judges’ scores and public votes. Each danced their Halloween-week routine again: Antonia and Xu their jive, Winstone and Gu their salsa, and Robb and Przystal their tango to Ghostbusters.

Advertisement

How the judges decided

The format added a twist for the panel. Rather than choosing which couple to save, the judges had to name the one they wanted to eliminate. Shirley Ballas, Anton Du Beke and Craig Revel Horwood all picked Robb and Przystal, which settled the result. Motsi Mabuse’s casting vote was not needed, though she said she would have made the same choice.

The result is slightly surprising on paper. Robb and Przystal scored 26 on the Halloween leaderboard, above Tabby Stoecker and Mark Karmalita and Graeme Hall and Lauren Oakley, who were tied on 25. The sources do not give the public vote breakdown, but the pair’s position suggests viewer support was a factor in their landing in the bottom three.

Who topped the leaderboard

At the other end of the table, Lacey Turner and Vito Coppola led the week with a Charleston to Crazy Stupid Love, with each judge giving them a nine. The reports differ slightly on their total: one lists 36, the other 37. Four nines make 36, which is the figure that fits. John Nellis and Katya Jones followed on 35, with Cach Mercer and Maddie Ingoldsby and Delta Goodrem and Kai Widdrington both on 33.

One notable fall was Stoecker and Karmalita. They had topped the previous week’s scoreboard but dropped to the bottom of this one with their Quickstep to Black Magic.

Advertisement

A one-off twist, and a Halloween cameo

The Strictly triple dance-off appears to be a one-off. The show goes back to the usual two-couple dance-off for the rest of the series, so this week’s three-way contest was a Halloween-week special rather than a permanent change.

The results show stayed on theme. The professional dancers performed a vampire-themed group routine to Dracula by Tame Impala, which was recorded earlier in the year. It was narrated by Sir Ian McKellen, who read from Bram Stoker’s novel at the climax. Becky Hill also performed.

The remaining 10 couples return to BBC One on Saturday 7 November at 6.30pm, with the results show at 7.10pm the following night. After the first Strictly triple dance-off, the competition now enters a stage where every elimination is a straight two-way contest.

Related reading:
Advertisement
Sources:

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Halloween Box Office Sinks to Roughly $60 Million as Holmes Documentary Edges Out ‘Clayface’

Published

on

halloween box office

Header image: AI-generated illustration by WordUp News.

The Halloween box office was a quiet affair in North America, and the film that came out on top was a near-three-hour documentary in its third weekend. A24’s “You Can See Everything,” about Elizabeth Holmes, took the top spot with an estimated $10.6 million. It beat Warner Bros.’ “Clayface” by about $200,000, according to studio estimates released Sunday.

Final numbers arrive Monday, and a photo finish can flip. Still, the estimates point to a modest victory for a film that cost only $7 million to make.

Why the Halloween box office stalled

Total ticket sales for the weekend came to roughly $60 million, according to Rentrak. That ranks among the slowest weekends of 2026, and one estimate suggested it would not climb past $63 million. There were no major new wide releases, and the holiday fell on a Saturday, usually the biggest moviegoing night.

Advertisement

“With costume parties, trick-or-treating and countless other Halloween activities, theaters were facing some pretty stiff competition for people’s time and attention,” said Rentrak’s Paul Dergarabedian. Families tend to choose trick-or-treating over the multiplex when the holiday lands on a weekend.

The weekend was still an improvement on last year’s. The 2025 Halloween frame totaled about $49 million, led by “Regretting You” and “Black Phone 2.” The year as a whole is also running well ahead, with domestic box office up more than 17% from 2025 at nearly $8.5 billion.

A documentary’s unlikely run

“You Can See Everything” has now earned about $63.9 million in North America, and it hasn’t opened internationally yet. This was its first weekend at No. 1. Dergarabedian called that “a rare achievement for any film, let alone a documentary running more than three hours.”

Variety reports that enthusiastic word of mouth and repeat viewings are driving the run, as audiences return to process what the film shows. It is expected to finish as one of the biggest documentaries in decades.

Advertisement

‘Clayface’ and the economics of a smaller superhero film

“Clayface,” an R-rated origin story for the Batman villain, fell 57% in its second weekend. It has made $44.1 million domestically and $83 million worldwide, against a reported $44 million budget. That is lean for DC. Last year’s “Superman” cost $225 million, and July’s “Supergirl” cost $175 million. Variety attributes the lower spending to the film’s darker tone and a title character less famous than DC’s headliners. Bigger bets follow with “Superman: Man of Tomorrow” next summer and “The Batman: Part II” in 2028.

The rest of the top five

Laika’s stop-motion fantasy “Wildwood” held third with $7.5 million, down 39%, for a $25.9 million domestic total. Its $100 million budget makes a theatrical profit unlikely, Variety notes.

“Wicker,” a comedy with Olivia Colman and Alexander Skarsgård, took fourth with $4.1 million, a 28% drop. Its $13.2 million total looks healthy for a Sundance pickup that cost $2.5 million to acquire. “Street Fighter” was fifth with $3.2 million after a 63% decline. It has made $53 million in North America and $91.9 million worldwide, but its $82 million budget and the share of ticket sales theaters keep leave it far from breaking even.

Further down, the Sundance title “The Only Living Pickpocket in New York” added more than 1,000 locations and earned $1.9 million for eighth place. Netflix’s World War II film “The Mosquito Bowl” made $455,000 from 349 theaters. Variety also noted that Zach Cregger’s “Resident Evil” reboot has reached $400 million globally.

Advertisement

Taken together, the results show a market that is healthy over the year but sensitive to the calendar. The Halloween box office was held back by the date, and the weekend’s winner was a small documentary rather than a studio tentpole.

Related reading:
Sources:

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Tovah Feldshuh Says ‘Tensions Are Not Rising’ on ‘Nobody Wants This’ as Season 4 Remains Unrenewed

Published

on

tovah feldshuh

Tovah Feldshuh is drawing a line between disagreement and discord on the set of Netflix’s “Nobody Wants This.” The actress, who plays Bina, the mother of Adam Brody’s Rabbi Noah, says the cast’s split over the Israel-Palestine conflict is real but is not turning into friction at work.

Tovah Feldshuh Separates ‘Tensions’ From ‘Profound Differences’

Feldshuh responded on Threads to a user who claimed “tensions are emerging” on the show. Her reply was pointed: “Tensions are NOT RISING. Profound differences of opinion are.” She asked people not to “conflate the two” and said none of it “will be brought to the set.” She added that she deeply enjoys filming the series and hopes it is “chosen” to continue for a fourth season.

That last line matters because the show has not been renewed. Creator Erin Foster has said she has “more story to tell,” but Netflix has not committed to a Season 4.

Advertisement

How the Disagreement Began

The debate traces back to a September GQ interview in which Brody spoke plainly about the war in Gaza. “Put me down as thinking it’s a genocide,” he said. “Put me down as wanting a free Palestine.” He called the death and misery “awful” and said the situation seemed to be reaching a breaking point. Deadline’s account of the interview adds that he voiced hope that “another administration” could correct policies he believes worsen the crisis.

Foster, who is Jewish and drew on her own relationship with her husband for the show, responded more cautiously. She called the issue “complicated” and said she loves Brody but disagrees with him. She likened the set to “dinner tables around the world where people are having debate and discussion and disagreeing,” and added, “that’s OK.”

Feldshuh’s reaction was much sharper. She told The New York Post that accusing the Jewish people of genocide is “wild” and “right out of Hitler’s playbook,” arguing that it takes the victim and makes the victim the perpetrator. Her Threads post suggests she wants the dispute understood as a clash of convictions, not a breakdown in working relationships.

A Show That Has Steered Clear of Politics

The public argument is striking partly because the series itself has avoided the conflict. “Nobody Wants This” follows Joanne (Kristen Bell), an agnostic podcaster who falls for the progressive Rabbi Noah and starts exploring conversion to Judaism, a choice that unsettles both of their families. Its themes are faith, identity and family expectations, not geopolitics.

Advertisement

Still, a series built on Jewish identity can hardly keep real-world debates at bay once its stars start speaking publicly. The cast’s comments suggest Foster’s “dinner table” comparison is what the production is aiming for: open disagreement without turning the set into a battleground.

Whether that holds will be tested only if Netflix orders more episodes. For now, Tovah Feldshuh is making clear that she wants to return, and that, in her telling, the disagreement stays off the soundstage.

Related reading:
Sources:

File photo: Tovah Feldshuh 2016 (cropped).png by Neshamasheli, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Advertisement

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Paul Bettany’s 10 Blood Vessels Burst on VisionQuest Set: “A Lesson in Less Is More”

Published

on

paul bettany blood vessels

Playing a near-indestructible android didn’t spare him from a very human injury. Paul Bettany says he burst about 10 blood vessels in one eye while filming Marvel’s VisionQuest, the result of what he calls some seriously overcooked acting.

What Paul Bettany said about the blood vessels

Bettany shared the story on Jimmy Kimmel Live, as reported by Deadline and Variety. The scene called for him to pretend a device on his head was messing with his brain. “I was just wildly overacting,” he said, “and I blew out about 10 blood vessels in my eye.” His verdict: “It was a lesson in less is more.”

According to Variety, Kimmel then showed the audience a photo of the blood-filled eyeball. Bettany said the redness lasted “like two weeks.” He assumes it “must’ve cost production so much” to remove it with CGI. That is his own guess about how the show handled it, not a confirmed account of the visual effects work.

Advertisement

A joke about the actor’s own eyesight

Bettany also found some irony in the mishap. “The actor playing Vision is kind of myopic,” he joked, adding that he “can’t see a thing” without his glasses. He said that is “great depending on the actor you’re working with.”

The anecdote fits the show’s premise, which asks Vision to look inward. VisionQuest is set after WandaVision (2021). It follows the character as he communicates with several AI personas embedded in his programming while trying to work out who he is. With a bounty on his head, he goes on the run with a mysterious teen played by Ruaridh Mollica, who may be his reincarnated son.

Where VisionQuest stands now

Variety reports that the eight-episode series debuted on Disney+ on October 14. Deadline says the Season 1 finale airs November 10. Bettany first appeared in the Marvel Cinematic Universe as the voice of J.A.R.V.I.S. in the first Iron Man. He then played Vision in Avengers: Age of Ultron, Captain America: Civil War, Avengers: Infinity War and WandaVision.

James Spader returns as Ultron, and the cast also includes Henry Lewis, Jonathan Sayer, James D’Arcy, Orla Brady and Emily Hampshire. The coverage doesn’t say which episode or scene the injury happened in, so viewers will have to guess whether the brain-device sequence is the one.

Advertisement

The sources don’t say whether Bettany needed any medical treatment beyond waiting for the redness to fade. What they do show is an actor laughing at himself. Paul Bettany’s blood vessels paid the price for a scene he now says would have worked better with a lighter touch.

Related reading:
Sources:

File photo: Paul Bettany – Los Angeles Comic Con 2025.jpg by Kevin Paul, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Taika Waititi Calls Critics “Obsolete” as Klara and the Sun Earns Just $1.7M Worldwide

Published

on

klara and the sun

Taika Waititi has told critics they are “irrelevant, out of touch, obsolete” and “in the bin” after Klara and the Sun opened to a rotten Rotten Tomatoes score and a box office launch that barely registered. The film had grossed about $1.7 million worldwide at the time of reporting.

The Oscar-winning director posted the broadside on Instagram on Halloween, sharing the film’s poster along with its Rotten Tomatoes audience and critics scores. “I haven’t read a review of anything aimed at me or my peers in almost 15 years. But I do listen to the people,” he wrote. He then urged followers to “spare a thought for those sad lost souls who couldn’t achieve their dreams of becoming artists, and thus became critics,” adding that they were “the same people who also hated Jojo Rabbit.”

What the Klara and the Sun scores show

The gap Waititi highlighted is real, though the exact figures shift depending on the outlet and the hour. Reports put the critics’ score between 26 and 28 percent. The audience score was cited at 78 percent in his post, and Deadline noted it had slipped to 73 percent by its report. IGN put it at 74 percent. Either way, viewers have been far kinder than reviewers.

Advertisement

Deadline’s own review said the director seemed a natural fit for Kazuo Ishiguro’s 2021 novel, given his taste for peculiar, cringe-tinged comedy. It concluded that the film “just doesn’t deliver on any of the fronts it promises.” Deadline also reported that the negative notes began with the film’s screening at the BFI London Film Festival this month.

His Jojo Rabbit jab is less clear-cut. IGN pointed out that the 2019 film holds an 81 percent critics’ score on Rotten Tomatoes and drew strong notices, including an 8.5/10 from IGN itself. It is not obvious which negative reaction he means.

A box office launch that barely registered

The commercial picture is harder to spin. Sony reportedly cut the release of Klara and the Sun to roughly 880 North American theaters, down from an anticipated 2,000, according to the sources. The film opened to an estimated $701,000 to $725,000 domestically, depending on the report, and landed outside the top 10. IGN, citing Deadline, said Sony stopped reporting the film’s earnings over the following weekend. Reported budgets range from about $20 million to $40 million.

Some commenters on Deadline’s story blamed thin marketing rather than the reviews, saying they had seen almost no trailers. Others said a film tracking that low would never get a big promotional push. The sources don’t settle that argument, and it’s impossible to say from the numbers alone how much the reviews, the marketing or the material itself drove the result.

Advertisement

The film, and Waititi’s view of AI

The adaptation stars Jenna Ortega as Klara, an “Artificial Friend” bought for a gravely ill teenager, with Amy Adams as the girl’s mother. Waititi’s AI comments at the New York premiere, reported by The Hollywood Reporter, now sit awkwardly beside the public spat. He said AI use in the industry is probably inevitable, but that he wants it used “as a tool, as opposed to a replacement.” He added, “I don’t want to replace humans. I want to work with them.”

Directors pushing back on critics is hardly new, and the audience scores give Waititi some ground to stand on. But with Klara and the Sun struggling to find moviegoers at all, a public attack on reviewers is unlikely to change the box office story. The film is a small-scale test of how far a director’s name and a famous novel can carry a project when both reviews and release plans go wrong.

Related reading:
Sources:

File photo: Taika Waititi photo by pouria afkhami (cropped).jpg by Pixoos, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Advertisement

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Michael Mann gun range accident: Heat director, 83, treated for “superficial” leg wound

Published

on

michael mann gun range accident

Michael Mann, the 83-year-old director of Heat, was treated at a hospital and released after a Michael Mann gun range accident in Los Angeles on Saturday, according to his representative. The injury was described as superficial, and the filmmaker is now said to be on his way home.

The Associated Press reported the news after speaking with Mann’s representative on Sunday. The story first surfaced on the celebrity site TMZ. In a statement quoted by several outlets, the representative said: “On Saturday, at a gun range, a weapon accidentally discharged while holstered resulting in a superficial injury to film director Michael Mann. He was treated and is being released.”

What we know about the incident

The core facts are consistent across the coverage. The accident happened Saturday, which was Halloween, at a Los Angeles gun range. The Guardian names the venue as The Range LA. A gun went off while still in its holster, and the bullet struck Mann in the leg. Emergency services were called and he was taken to a hospital.

Advertisement

The finer details differ slightly between outlets, and some remain unclear. TMZ, as relayed by the Guardian, said Mann had been trying to holster the weapon when it discharged. IGN, also citing TMZ, said the incident happened during a training exercise of some kind and that Mann had no intention of harming himself. The representative’s statement says only that the gun discharged while holstered. IGN itself noted that additional details are unclear.

Several reports stressed Mann’s familiarity with firearms. The Independent said he has apparently been an experienced target shooter for decades and that the accident happened at a sanctioned range. That detail fits a long-standing reputation for rigorous, hands-on preparation in his crime films, though none of the sources suggest the film work was connected to Saturday’s events.

What it means for Heat 2

The timing will draw attention because Mann is in the middle of preparing his long-awaited follow-up to Heat. According to IGN, Christian Bale confirmed in February that he would soon begin filming in Chicago, and Leonardo DiCaprio joined the project in July. Both are reportedly set to play Vincent Hanna and Chris Shiherlis, though IGN framed the casting details as reported rather than confirmed. Stephen Graham and Ebon Moss-Bachrach are also expected to appear, and the film will draw on Mann’s novel of the same name.

The sources disagree on the schedule. IGN said filming had been expected to begin this month, while the Independent, citing the AP, said the sequel is supposed to begin filming early next year. Nothing in the reporting says the injury will delay production, and the description of the wound as superficial suggests no major disruption. Still, no one involved has commented on the production calendar since the incident.

Advertisement

A busy stretch for a veteran filmmaker

The Michael Mann gun range accident comes during an active period for the director, whose credits include Manhunter, The Last of the Mohicans, Collateral, Thief, Public Enemies and the 2023 drama Ferrari with Adam Driver and Penélope Cruz. He also helped create the 1980s TV series Miami Vice. IGN reports that last month he premiered a director’s cut of his 2006 Miami Vice film and discussed his latest changes at a Q&A at Beyond Fest.

For now, the picture is reassuring. A holstered weapon discharged, an experienced shooter was hurt, and the injury was minor enough that he was released the same weekend. Further details, including how the discharge happened, have not been made public, and Mann’s representative has so far offered only the brief statement above.

Related reading:
Sources:

File photo: Michael Mann – French Cinematheque – 4th July 2009.jpg by Thbz, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Advertisement

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Patrick Stewart death at 86: Judi Dench “very sad” as tributes pour in

Published

on

patrick stewart death

The Patrick Stewart death, announced after the actor died at 86 at his Los Angeles home on Wednesday evening, has drawn tributes from across theatre, film and politics, with Dame Judi Dench among the first of his contemporaries to speak publicly about the loss.

Speaking to the Press Association at an event marking 50 years of the National Theatre building, Dame Judi, 91, said she was “very, very shocked” and “very surprised” by the news. She described a colleague who never coasted. “He’s never been one of those actors who never felt like it that night, he was always very, very committed,” she said. “He’ll be much missed and he was much admired.”

A shared stage and a shared classroom

Dench and Stewart both belonged to the Royal Shakespeare Company. Stewart joined in 1966 and went on to appear in dozens of its productions, building a stage reputation long before television made him a household name. The two also appeared together in Playing Shakespeare, a 1982 television masterclass series.

That grounding in classical theatre was the thread running through many of the tributes. Sir David Suchet, Dame Harriet Walter, James McAvoy and Sir Ian McKellen were among those who paid their respects. Downing Street said Stewart “never forgot his working-class Yorkshire roots” and brought “joy to millions”. On Friday’s edition of BBC’s The One Show, presenters Roman Kemp and Clara Amfo closed the programme with a 2023 clip in which Stewart recalled his first time on a stage. “I felt safer than I’d ever felt in my life,” he said.

Advertisement

What the family statement said

A statement on Stewart’s Instagram page said he died after a “brief and poignant journey with Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementia”. The Mirror reported that his wife, Sunny, confirmed the news. The statement said he was surrounded by family and friends, live music, prayers and laughter, and it remembered him for “the dignity, compassion and humanity he brought to every role – in his art and life.”

It also highlighted his philanthropy and activism, including work for survivors of domestic violence, refugees, veterans’ mental health services and animal welfare. It described him as a Knight, Chancellor, motor sport enthusiast and lifelong Huddersfield fan. Rather than flowers, the family asked for contributions to the Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre Fund and the Alzheimer’s Foundation of America’s caregiver resources.

A career from Shakespeare to the Starship Enterprise

Born in Mirfield, West Yorkshire, in 1940, Stewart had a career of six decades. He won two Olivier Awards for supporting roles in Shakespeare, for Antony and Cleopatra in 1979 and Hamlet in 2009. He also earned four Emmy nominations and a Grammy for a children’s recording of Peter and the Wolf. Global fame came as Captain Jean-Luc Picard in Star Trek: The Next Generation from 1987, and later as Professor Charles Xavier in the X-Men films, beginning in 2000. Fans will see him once more as Xavier in Avengers: Doomsday, due in mid-December.

Understanding the conditions behind his death

Coverage of the Patrick Stewart death has also prompted questions about the two conditions named. Lewy body dementia, also called dementia with Lewy bodies, is caused by clumps of protein in the brain’s nerve cells. The Independent reports that it is thought to affect around 100,000 people in the UK. Around 5 per cent of diagnosed dementia cases are recorded as this type, but specialists argue it is under-diagnosed and the true share could be as high as 20 per cent.

Advertisement

Symptoms can include hallucinations, confusion, slow movement, tremors, disturbed sleep and fainting spells. Many of these overlap with Alzheimer’s, which makes diagnosis difficult. A US physician told HuffPost there is no single definitive test. There is no cure, though medication and therapies can ease symptoms. Survival after diagnosis is estimated at five to seven years on average, though it can be far longer.

Public awareness of the condition rose after Robin Williams was diagnosed with it posthumously following his 2014 death. For Stewart’s admirers, the Patrick Stewart death is a reminder of how little warning these illnesses can give, and of the dedication Dench says he brought to every performance.

Related reading:
Sources:

File photo: Patrick Stewart 1999.jpg by Kingkongphoto & www.celebrity-photos.com from Laurel Maryland, USA, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Advertisement

WordUp Morning

Ten stories, both sides of each, in five minutes. Free, every weekday at 7am, plus a Saturday weekend edition.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue Reading

Trending