Connect with us
DAPA Banner

NewsBeat

3 hidden passport rules that will prevent you from flying

Published

on

3 hidden passport rules that will prevent you from flying

There are plenty of details travellers need to be aware of in the build-up to their flight, and passports are a crucial part of that.

One thing that people might not know is that your passport needs to be in good condition, with no ripped or torn pages, water damage or holes.

This is so border control can make sure it is readable and hasn’t been fraudulently tampered with.

Advertisement

However, there are a few other rules that people need to be aware of and keep in line with.

3 passport rules that will stop you from flying

Two or more blank pages needed in passport

Your passport has lots of blank pages for border control to stamp when arriving or leaving countries.

However, what you might not know is that some nations require there to be at least two blank pages, otherwise they won’t let you through.

Natasha Inglis, Implementation and Client Success Director at Good Business Travel, explains: “Many countries require at least two completely blank visa pages (in some cases more) to allow room for entry and exit stamps or full-page visas.

Advertisement

“These rules are in place to make sure immigration officials have the space to properly document your movements and avoid complications at the border.

“Airlines may also check this at the boarding gate, as they could face fines if a passenger is later refused entry at immigration.

“This means travellers can be denied boarding before they even leave the UK if their passport doesn’t meet page requirements.”

Advertisement

Many European countries have this restriction, alongside African nations like South Africa and Kenya and Asian countries such as India, Thailand and Indonesia.

In Namibia, it is required to have up to six blank pages in your passport.

The UK passport has 34 pages, so it shouldn’t fill up too quickly, although if you’re a frequent flyer it might pose more of a problem.

Dr Mohanjeet Brar, MD of Gamewatchers African Safaris, suggests getting a jumbo passport if you fall into that category.

Advertisement

He said: “The UK offers passports with more pages (48 instead of 34), ideal for frequent travellers or those planning multiple-entry visas.”

Between three and six months of validity needed on passport

Since 2021, the EU has considered British travellers as ‘third country nationals’, which means travellers’ passports must have a minimum of three months’ validity remaining on the date you leave the EU.

Ian McIlrath, Managing Director at Ski Solutions, shares that you’ll need six months at the very least when visiting countries such as China, Australia, Thailand, Turkey, and Egypt.

Since these requirements vary by destination, you should always confirm the specific rules for your chosen country at the time of booking. 

Advertisement

10-year issue date

Sean Doolan, director of ancillaries at travel insurance broker Swinton Travel Insurance, shares that if you’re travelling to EU or Schengen countries, your passport must have been issued within the last 10 years.

This is alongside the three months of validity needed as well.

He added: “If you fail to satisfy either of these requirements, you won’t be allowed to board your flight, because airlines are fined by governments if they carry passengers whose documents are not in order.”

Advertisement

UK passports are only issued for 10 years, so you might be wondering why this could be an issue.

This is because a previous rule meant you could carry up to nine months from an old passport onto a new one, which was the case before September 2018.

Matt Bramich, Operations Director at Inghams Walking, shares: “However, some UK residents will still have a valid passport that was issued before 10 September 2018, which may look like it’s valid for longer than 10 years.

“That’s because prior to this change, UK citizens were able to carry up to nine months from an old passport into a new one.

Advertisement

“However, this rule no longer applies for travel to the EU, which can cause confusion. 

“In simple terms, the EU border authorities assess the validity based on the date of issue, not the expiration date.

“So, even if one of these passports still has months remaining before its printed expiry, it will be refused.” 

Advertisement

New ETIAS rules launching in 2026

Alongside passport rules you need to keep in mind, travel to EU countries from the UK will be changing soon.


Recommended reading:


The European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) is expected to begin operating in late 2026.

Once live, UK passport holders visiting 30 European countries for up to 90 days will need approval before travelling.

Advertisement

This will cost €20, but will be free for under-18s and over-70s and will be valid for three years or until your passport expires.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Bec from MAFS Australia issues apology to Rachel for ‘vulgar’ comment at couples retreat

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Married at First Sight Australia’s annual couples retreat was far from relaxing as Bec Zacharia ended up upsetting Rachel Gilmore by sharing intimate details with the group

Bec Zacharia has apologised to Rachel Gilmore for the “vulgar” comment she made during the Married at First Sight Australia couples retreat.

Jaws were left on the floor when Bec took it upon herself to share with the group that Rachel and her husband Steven Danyluk had progressed in their intimacy after recent struggles to connect in the bedroom.

Advertisement

Some of the group already knew of their progress but were shocked when Bec announced it to everyone else.

It has since been revealed that an unaired conversation between Bec and Steven happened before her “disrespectful” speech.

Although there is now more context to the situation, Bec has apologised for how the evening unfolded and the decisions she made.

Appearing on the After The Dinner Party show together, Rachel, Steven, and Bec all spoke about the eventful trip with all the brides and grooms.

Rachel admitted she would have “squashed” it earlier with Bec if she had known about the conversation between Bec and Steven prior to her speech.

She explained: “Genuinely, like, it kind of gives context because then I would have gone out of my way then to approach Bec and like, ‘I get why you’ve said it now’, I could have squashed it. I was overreacting.”

Bec interrupted and disagreed saying: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, you’re not overreacting, because what you feel is what you feel and you are allowed to feel what you feel.

Advertisement

“What I said was completely politically incorrect. I have the most vulgar sense of humour.”

Bec added that she wouldn’t allow Rachel to “blame” herself for the situation as she was the one who made the comment.

In the unaired conversation, Steven can been seen sitting and chatting with Bec and Alissa Fay.

Advertisement

Before Bec says to him, “I’m so glad you got…stuck a finger in babes…” Steven questioned her, saying: “How do you know it’s even one finger?”

Bec immediately responded, “I guessing it’s two”, before adding that she was “so happy” for the couple.

After watching the conversation unfold, Rachel admitted at the time she thought Steve had “supported” her. However, he essentially created an environment in which jokes could be openly made.

Advertisement

She told Mamamia: “In private, Steven was telling me how crude Bec is and how she was ‘bang out of line’… Well, you said it too, sweetie. He never owned it. He let Bec take the fall.”

In the same interview she said that while Bec apologised, she didn’t believe she was “sorry for the impact” of her comment.

Rachel said: “She was sorry for the intent — the joke — but she wasn’t sorry for the impact. The impact was that I felt humiliated and shamed.

“A joke at my expense — especially one that is extremely sexual and puts my body on display — is not okay.”

Advertisement

Married at First Sight Australia airs Monday to Thursday on E4 at 7.30pm

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Only three dog mess fines issued in Darlington last year

Published

on

Only three dog mess fines issued in Darlington last year

The figures, released by Darlington Borough Council through a freedom of information request, reveal that only three fixed penalty notices were issued in 2025, all by the council’s dedicated dog warden. Civic enforcement officers issued none.

A concerned Darlington resident told The Northern Echo: “We’ve lived in the area for almost five years now and have two dogs, and over the last year or so I have noticed an increase in dog fouling on the streets in our area.

“It is more noticeable on the footpaths than it is down Cemetery Lane or Stanhope Park for example – particularly on Abbey Road – where there are multiple public bins for people to dispose of the mess.

“There are a few occasions where there have been full poo bags left on walls of residential properties by parents on the school run – again despite there being bins on Abbey Road.”

Advertisement

The data also showed that 188 stray dogs were found in 2025, with 40 of them unchipped.

College ward representative Cllr Matthew Snedker said he “absolutely understands” the anger of residents who do not see poo being picked up.

Cllr Matthew Snedker with a dog poo bin. (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)

“This is a huge issue, it is unacceptable for people not to pick up after their dogs,” he said

“I have been out with the dog warden and when people see them out and about, they pick up the mess, or are warned.”

Advertisement

He explained that issuing fines is challenging, unless there is direct evidence.

Cllr Snedker said: “I speak with the dog warden and council officers regularly, they are doing a difficult job.”

Darlington Borough Council said the problem, while caused by a minority, affects the whole community.

A spokesperson said: “We know that the vast majority of pet owners are responsible and the actions of a few inconsiderate people can cause misery.

Advertisement

“We take dog fouling very seriously.

“In order to issue a fixed penalty notice, we have to catch a dog owner failing to pick up after their pet.

“We therefore rely on information from the public so we can build up a picture of when and where it is happening to catch people in the act.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

I’m A Celebrity South Africa star to leave camp ‘for good’ in Ant and Dec update

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

One of the I’m A Celebrity… South Africa stars will be leaving camp ‘for good’ as the eliminations are set to begin

Ant McPartlin and Dec Donnelly have confirmed one of the I’m A Celebrity… South Africa stars will be leaving camp ‘for good’ as the eliminations are set to begin.

Advertisement

The second series of the I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here spin-off got underway last week with the hosts welcoming back 12 former campmates as they agreed to return for more Bushtucker Trials in a bid to be crowned a “legend” of the ITV reality show.

This week, Harry Redknapp and Jimmy Bullard finally joined their ten campmates – including Adam Thomas, Sir Mo Farah, Gemma Collins and David Haye – for the remainder of the series.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

But unlike the Australian main series which is broadcast live each night with an 11-hour time difference, the South African series was pre-recorded last year, thought to be in September.

Advertisement

That means that instead of the public voting to eliminate the celebrities, the campmates themselves will choose who to bid farewell to after various tough challenges are completed. But in a twist to the first series of I’m A Celeb South Africa, there will be a live final on April 24 where viewers will get to choose their winner.

And after fans recently started to question when the eliminations would begin, it was at the end of Tuesday (April 14) night’s episode that Ant and Dec announced that the next edition of the programme would see the first exit from camp.

“It is time for the first celebrity to leave the camp for good,” the hosts informed the campmates during a teaser for that is to come in Wednesday’s (April 15) episode, whilst it was also revealed that Scarlett Moffatt and Gemma Collins will face the next Bushtucker Trial.

Advertisement

As a new week got underway in South Africa, the campmates were surprised as they were joined by two new celebrities. Heading to the trial clearing, The Royal Express arrived at the platform, with the campmates eager to see which new faces will be joining them.

It was then revealed that Harry Redknapp and Jimmy Bullard were entering the camp. Taking their place on the thrones, the pair were introduced as the Lion King (Harry) and the Rhino King (Jimmy), with them taking it in turns to create their new teams.

With the new teams chosen, it was up to Adam and Craig Charles to fight for glory on behalf of Jimmy, as Ashley Roberts and David worked hard for Harry. As the stars were tied to bungee ropes, they dug through mud to find golden nuggets.

It was then revealed that Adam and Craig had collected more than their opposition, and therefore won. Upon returning back to their respective camps, tensions ran high as the Rhinos cheered loudly as they celebrated. With only a tall screen separating them, the Lion camp couldn’t hide their disappointment.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

East West Rail releases fresh details as locals ask if enough people will use line

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

The East West Railway Company has released an updated proposal for a new rail line connecting Oxford, Milton Keynes, Bedford and Cambridge

Cambridgeshire Live readers have voiced their opinions on proposals for a new rail line in the county, with many sharing strong views. Comments centred on whether the route is necessary, how it will be operated, and whether it is suited to future travel needs.

East West Railway Company (EWR Co) has released an updated proposal for a new railway line in Cambridgeshire. The new route would connect Oxford, Milton Keynes, Bedford, and Cambridge, with up to five trains per hour planned.

Advertisement

The revised proposals now factor in the new Universal Resort near Bedford and the heightened passenger demand anticipated as a result of the development. A station at Stewartby has been earmarked to serve the theme park.

Some readers questioned whether the demand exists to justify the line. Camssurvivor writes: “Five trains an hour? Brilliant. Over the past 60 years, freight transport on the railways has fallen by 63 per cent. If you look at cross-country passenger trains, there aren’t many passengers on them. Only the London commuter lines are busy.”

Alydavid comments: “We wait at our local level crossing every day, watching empty trains hurtle by. The actual plan is to build many more houses and further strain the overstretched poor infrastructure.”

Marlesherbes feels: “EWR has but a single problem. The Unions; there are still no trains between Bedford & Oxford as the unions refuse to allow trains unless there’s both a driver and a guard, the latter to operate the doors, which are automatic anyway!”

Advertisement

Creda1 adds: “Perhaps closer to Cambridge City centre would be a good idea and not nearly 2 miles out.”

Feelgood66 comments: “So five trains an hour plus the trains from Kings Cross coming in from Royston direction, plus the trains coming up from Stansted direction. All funnelling into Shelford. Wouldn’t want to live near that junction, it’s bad enough living next to the Kings Cross line as I do, right next to the area the lines will meet near Harston.”

Drdpy says: “With small trains running four times an hour, that is 231,840 people a week. The population of Cambridge is 157,697, and Oxford is about 165,000. Is it possible that there are insufficient trains running between the two cities? Is there sufficient parking for cars and bicycles if everyone in the city actually used the train? Is that why the new stations, South Cambridge and the proposed East Cambridge, have no car parks?

“There is no available land on which to build mass transport. That is why the newly proposed busway from Cambourne to Cambridge through Coton Orchard is stopping a mile outside the city. The University does not agree that the city needs better transport and has stopped development for decades. The new stations will have bike racks, but not enough for the number of passengers proposed. The city will need new pedestrian ways to cope with the numbers.”

Advertisement

Is there a need for this route? Comment below or HERE to join in the conversation.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Learner drivers to get booking fees refunded over crackdown on drip-pricing

Published

on

Learner drivers to get booking fees refunded over crackdown on drip-pricing

Two AA-owned driving schools have been ordered by the UK competition watchdog to refund more than 80,000 customers and have been fined £4.2 million over drip-pricing.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the AA Driving School and BSM Driving School did not include a mandatory £3 booking fee in upfront prices.

This is an illegal practice known as drip-pricing.

The amount repaid to individuals will vary depending on how many lesson packages they bought, with the average being about £9.

Advertisement

This will total more than £760,000.

The refunds and fine combined will almost be £5 million.

This is the first financial penalty the CMA has imposed for breach of consumer law since it was handed new enforcement powers.

CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell said: “If a fee is mandatory, the law is clear: it must be included in the price from the very start – not added at checkout – so consumers always know what they need to pay.

Advertisement

“At a time when people are watching every pound, dripped fees can tip the balance. And when it comes to something as important – and costly – as learning to drive, people deserve clarity.

“With our new powers, it will never pay to break the law or treat consumers unfairly. Where the rules are ignored, we’ll step in to put things right.”

A spokesperson for AA driving schools said: “Although the £3 booking fee was made clear to customers prior to their purchase, we acknowledge it should have also been displayed at the start of the online booking journey.

“Having listened to the regulator, we made immediate changes to our website to make the £3 booking fee more prominent.

Advertisement

“We are now refunding all relevant customers. Whilst we are disappointed with the outcome of the investigation, we have fully co-operated with the CMA throughout and would emphasise that protecting consumer rights has been central to our business for more than 120 years.”

Affected customers do not need to take any action, the CMA said.

The AA Driving School or BSM Driving School will write to them stating that the money will be automatically refunded onto the card they used to pay for their lessons.

If that is not possible, they will be sent a cheque.

Advertisement

In 2023, the Department for Business and Trade found nearly half of online businesses used dripped fees, with consumers spending up to £3.5 billion per year as a result.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

HMRC Child Benefit boost lands but some families missing out

Published

on

HMRC Child Benefit boost lands but some families missing out

From 6 April, payments increased to £27.05 a week for the eldest or only child and £17.90 a week for each additional child, giving families up to £1,406 a year for their first child.

HM Revenue and Customs has confirmed that more than 6.9 million families receiving Child Benefit are now being paid at the new higher rates. Most payments arrive in bank accounts on a Monday or Tuesday.

With payments typically made every four weeks, many parents should now start to notice the increase in their latest or upcoming payment, depending on their payment cycle.

Advertisement

However, officials are warning that thousands of families could still be missing out entirely. Latest figures show only 72% of parents claim Child Benefit within their baby’s first year.

Because claims can only be backdated for three months, delaying an application could mean losing out on hundreds of pounds.

Myrtle Lloyd, HMRC’s chief customer officer, said: “Looking after a child can be expensive, especially a newborn. It takes a few minutes to claim Child Benefit via the app and doing so as soon as you can after your baby is born will ensure you don’t miss out on vital financial support.”

Parents are being urged to check their bank accounts now to make sure they are receiving the correct amount, and to act quickly if they have not yet made a claim.

Advertisement

Most applications are now completed online or through the HMRC app, with around 85% of claims submitted digitally.

Experts at Money and Pensions Service also recommend checking eligibility using online tools, as some families may not realise they qualify.

Anna Sharkey from the Money and Pensions Service, said: “Use MoneyHelper’s free Benefits Calculator if you think you, or someone you know, might be eligible for Child Benefit. The calculator will show you all the benefits you’re eligible for.

“Other MoneyHelper tools for new parents include the Baby Cost Calculator to help you budget when having a baby, and the Baby Money Timeline which gives you key dates to help you plan your finances.

Advertisement

“Visit MoneyHelper.org.uk for free and impartial money guidance for everyday money management.”


Recommended reading:


Payments are made directly into bank accounts and can be managed or updated easily.

Parents should also be aware of the High Income Child Benefit Charge if one partner earns over £60,000, although claiming can still protect National Insurance credits even if payments are repaid.

Advertisement

Officials say families who previously opted out can quickly restart payments, ensuring they benefit from the higher rates now in place.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Swansea city centre business to close as owner says things are ‘impossible’

Published

on

Wales Online

Owner Anna Redfern said that she made the tough decision to close the cinema as the ‘conditions to sustain’ an independent business are ‘becoming impossible’

Another business in Swansea has announced that they will be closing their doors later this year. In the last couple of months, the news broke that locations like Marks and Spencer, Turtle Bay and Gin and Juice would all be shutting down.

Advertisement

The indie film house, Cinema & Co. will be joining that list following an announcement on Facebook on Monday, April 13. Owner Anna Redfern said she made the tough decision to close the cinema, live venue and gallery space based in the centre of Swansea as the “conditions to sustain” an independent business are “becoming impossible”.

Ms Redfern said: “‘Every story has an ending. After 10 years I’ve made the decision not to renew the lease at Cinema & Co. This hasn’t been an easy decision but it’s been a necessary one.

“I’ve spent years trying to run this space in a way that felt right— not just financially but ethically and personally too. And the truth is that’s becoming harder and harder to do.

“Running an independent space today means wearing every hat, holding everything together, and constantly fighting to keep something special alive. And over time that takes its toll. Not just on the business but on the person behind it.”

Advertisement

She said sustaining a small independent business is now becoming “impossible”. “I know we’re not the only ones. You’re seeing it everywhere,” she added.

“Independent spaces are disappearing — not because people don’t care but because the conditions to sustain them are becoming impossible. So this is me choosing to end it on my terms rather than lose what made it what it was.

“We’ve got a few months left. If Cinema & Co has ever meant something to you come and be part of it while you still can. Don’t cry because it’s over, smile because it happened.” Never miss a Swansea story by signing up to our newsletter here

Advertisement

Many locals flooded the comments with support for the business and their disappointment over the news that they would be closing later this year.

One person said: “It’s gonna be quite weird not to see Cinema & Co on Swansea central high street, will definitely miss this venue.”

Another added: “What a shame, you are an inspiration to many – best of luck in whatever is next.”

However, others believe that closure of the establishment was inevitable following financial difficulties in the wake of their legal dispute over breaching coronavirus regulations during the pandemic.

Advertisement

One person said: “She made a few decisions that in the end put people off going there.”

Ms Redfern received fines amounting to £15,000 in December 2021 after admitting to violating Covid public health regulations. She was additionally ordered to pay £8,940 in prosecution costs, while the company itself was handed a £5,000 fine.

She also received a suspended prison sentence after pleading guilty to contempt of court for opening the cinema despite a court order, though in an unusual development she was later permitted to vacate that plea – effectively withdrawing it – and the matter was dropped.

Advertisement

In an interview which was published in 2022, Ms Redfern stated that given the opportunity to turn back the clock, she would make the same decision again.

She said: “I was sick of pretending to comply through fear of losing my livelihood which I guess is quite ironic because it looks like that is going to happen anyway.

“I stood in my truth and it was a matter of principle. We’ve got to be vocal because we are having our freedoms and our rights stripped away from us.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Baby found with drugs in system was ‘unkempt and unclean’ before tragic death

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Phoebe-Rose Douglas, 10 weeks old, died after cardiac arrest with tests showing exposure to cocaine, heroin and cannabis – her parents have since admitted child cruelty

A baby who died after being exposed to heroin and cocaine was discovered to have dirt beneath her fingernails and armpits after being rushed to hospital.

Nurses raised concerns about Phoebe-Rose Douglas’ ‘unkempt and smelly’ condition following her arrival at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, an inquest has heard.

Paramedics had been called to an address on Meaford Drive, Blurton, following reports the 10-week-old was in cardiac arrest on the morning of October 25 2019. She was transferred to the hospital’s paediatric intensive care unit, but died four days later on October 29, reports Stoke on Trent Live.

Advertisement

A urine sample taken on October 29 revealed a level of cocaine, the inquest heard. Tests conducted on hair samples showed she had been exposed to cocaine, heroin and cannabis.

Parents Rachel Bourne and John Douglas both admitted child cruelty at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court in 2024. Bourne was jailed for 31 months and Douglas given a 10-month custodial sentence, suspended for two years.

An inquest into Phoebe-Rose’s death is now being held this week at Swann House, Stoke.

The inquest heard Phoebe-Rose was born in Halifax in August 2019, where her father lived. She returned to Stoke-on-Trent a month later with her mother.

The inquest heard that Phoebe-Rose’s parents were both drug users. Several referrals had previously been made to social services before her birth, owing to concerns raised about the family, including one in July 2019 relating to their living conditions. They were subsequently evicted from the property, where drug paraphernalia was later discovered.

Phoebe-Rose missed her first round of routine immunisations and a standard developmental check with a GP, which would ordinarily take place at six to eight weeks of age.

Phoebe-Rose’s mother woke at around 5am on 25 October, picked her up, and discovered she was unresponsive. West Midlands Ambulance Service was immediately called.

Advertisement

The inquest heard that Phoebe-Rose was resuscitated, however scans carried out at hospital revealed she had sustained severe brain damage due to oxygen deprivation, and on 29 October the decision was taken to withdraw life support.

Paediatrician Dr Deborah Stalker told the inquest that hospital discharge notes from Phoebe-Rose’s birth showed no signs of neonatal abstinence syndrome – withdrawal symptoms that newborn babies may experience if they have been exposed to opiates while still in the womb.

“But she was a bit of a struggle to feed, reading between the lines of notes”, Dr Stalker added. “There was also evidence that feeding bottles were not sterilised prior to use – that had been observed in hospital.” When Phoebe-Rose was admitted to hospital in October 2019, “she was unkempt and she was unclean”, Dr Stalker told the inquest.

She went on to say: “She was smelly and she had dirty fingernails and feet and creases under arms and neck.”

Advertisement

Dr Roger Malcolmson, a consultant paediatric and perinatal pathologist, was involved in post-mortem examinations conducted following Phoebe-Rose’s death. He described her to the inquest as “relatively small”.

“There was no evidence of external injuries of any significance that would suggest a pattern of physical abuse”, he said.

“Her brain was swollen, which correlates with injury to brain cells and hypoxia (reduced oxygen to the brain). There was no obvious underlying cause. I think the biggest risk factor for this death we can identify from the history is maternal drug use and smoking.”

The inquest continues.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Getting Ready For School When Kids Are Sniffly: GP Shares Tips

Published

on

Signs Your Child's Posture Changes Might Be A 'Red Flag'

As I write this I can feel another illness taking hold: the headache, the stuffy nose, the scratchy throat. It can only mean one thing: the kids are back at school!

While plenty of people will be relieved to get back to normality after two weeks of juggling work and childcare, a survey of 1,000 parents by Olbas found over half (55%) dread their kids going back to school due to the increased chance of getting ill.

There’s no getting around it, they will (probably) get sick in the coming fortnight.

Dr Roger Henderson, an NHS GP and spokesperson for Olbas, says: “When children return to school after Easter holidays or extended breaks, it’s normal to see a sudden rise in sniffles, coughs, and stomach upsets.

Advertisement

“This isn’t because schools are unhealthy places, but rather because children are suddenly exposed to lots of germs they haven’t encountered in a while – almost like a refresher course for their immune systems!”

Younger children, especially those in primary school, may be hit hardest because their bodies are still learning how to handle common viruses.

“Parents should expect a wave of minor illnesses and be prepared with tissues, comfort foods, and perhaps a flexible routine to allow for extra rest,” says the doctor.

“The good news is that these minor illnesses help children build up stronger immune systems over time. While it can feel overwhelming at first, most of the common viral illnesses pass quickly, and children normally bounce back with their usual energy.”

Advertisement

Here, Dr Henderson shares some tips and tricks to overhaul your morning routine to at least give everyone a fighting chance amid the post-holiday bug surge.

1. Create a 10-15 minute buffer zone

The GP is a firm believer in creating a 10-15 minute ‘buffer zone’ on those mornings when the kids are waking up sniffly.

“The key here is preparation – putting out clothes, packing bags, and prepping lunches the night before gives you a head start, leaving more time for slower wake-ups when children aren’t feeling 100%,” he says.

Advertisement

“Building in a ‘buffer zone’ of 10-15 extra minutes can ease stress and reduce the chance of forgotten items or unexpected delays affecting you.”

2. Start the day with a warm shower or saline spray

If your kids are particularly congested first thing, a warm shower or saline nasal spray can help clear clogged sinuses and “make them feel fresher” for the day ahead.

3. Keep breakfast simple

Advertisement

When kids are feeling below par, something simple and nourishing to set them up for the day can work wonders. Dr Henderson suggests porridge, scrambled eggs, or smoothies are “easy options that don’t require much fuss”.

4. Take a calmer approach to rushed mornings

Easier said than done when you’ve got to be at work for 9am, but if kids aren’t feeling great, they’re going to require a bit more patience in the mornings. The GP says a “calm reassuring tone sets the pace here”.

When to keep your child off school

Advertisement

While kids can go to school with coughs and colds, there are instances where you shouldn’t send your child to school. Here’s what NHS Choices advises:

  • If they have a fever, keep them off until the fever goes away.
  • If they have a high temperature, keep them off school until it goes away.
  • If they have diarrhoea or vomiting they should stay away from school until they have not been sick or had diarrhoea for at least 48 hours.
  • If they have chickenpox, keep them off school until all the spots have crusted over – usually about five days after the spots first appeared.
  • If they have symptoms of Covid-19 including a high temperature, and they don’t feel well enough to go to school or do normal activities, keep them off.
  • If your child has an ear infection and a high temperature or severe earache, keep them off school until they’re feeling better or the high temperature goes away.
  • If your child has impetigo, they’ll need treatment from a GP – usually antibiotics. Keep them off school until all the sores have crusted over and healed, or for 48 hours after they start antibiotic treatment.
  • If your child has scarlet fever, they’ll need treatment with antibiotics from a GP. Otherwise they’ll be infectious for two to three weeks. Children can go back to school 24 hours after starting antibiotics, providing they feel well enough.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Read This If You Use Headphones Every Day

Published

on

Read This If You Use Headphones Every Day

If you peek outside, it’s pretty likely you’ll see several people running errands with a pair of headphones on. In our digital-first world, many of us use headphones all day long at work, on our commute and even at home when we’re cleaning or exercising.

Headphones are a convenient (and polite) way to listen to music, videos or calls in public. But does the direct sound exposure impact your ears and hearing any differently than other sound sources? Are headphones more damaging to your ear health?

Below, experts share what you should know about safe headphone use.

Listening to music or calls through headphones is no different than listening via a speaker.

Advertisement

Our ears don’t know where sound is coming from, said Catherine V. Palmer, an audiologist at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Sound can be damaging whether it’s coming from car speakers, living room speakers or headphones, she added.

“One is not more dangerous than another,” Palmer said.

There’s noise around you all the time, said Dr. Kenny Lin, an otolaryngologist at Houston Methodist, and headphones don’t pose a specific danger.

“It’s just the volume at which and the duration over which you are listening to music or phone calls or whatever the case might be,” Lin said. “As long as you’re using your headphones at a reasonable volume, it is no different than listening to music from the speaker or listening to the TV.”

Advertisement

Headphones can be more dangerous to your ears in specific situations, though.

“The one area where a headphone can be potentially riskier is that you place the sound source right up to the ear,” Lin noted.

If you mistakenly left the volume up very high on Spotify, for example, and then plug in your headphones, “the impact of that on your ear could be potentially higher just because of where it’s placed, closer to the ear in its first place,” Lin said.

According to Anna Bixler, an audiologist and the amplification and tinnitus program manager at Jefferson Balance and Hearing Center in Philadelphia, people can also run into problems if there is a lot of sound going on around them.

Advertisement

“That’s really where I see people get themselves into hot water with their streaming level, because when we’re in quiet, we tend to keep it to a pretty minimal volume … when we get on a train or when we’re running outside, and there’s a lot of noise around … that’s when we have a tendency to kick up the volume to compete with external signal,” Bixler said.

There is one simple way to combat this, though: Bixler recommends that folks turn on noise cancellation if it’s available on their headphones.

“That really, really helps a lot of people to keep their streaming volume to a much more minimal level,” Bixler added.

If you aren’t competing with external noise, you won’t be tempted to increase your volume, she said.

Advertisement

Tatiana Maksimova via Getty Images

Listening to music or calls through headphones is no more damaging than listening through a computer speaker, according to experts.

That said, sound-induced hearing loss is the most common type of hearing loss.

“The most common cause of hearing loss in adults is [sound-induced] hearing loss,” Palmer said.

But not all sounds are created equal. “‘Dose’ predicts whether sound will damage an individual’s hearing,” Palmer said. “Dose is the combination of how loud a sound is and how long you are exposed to it.”

Advertisement

“The louder the sound is and the longer the exposure, the more likely that there will be damage,” Palmer continued, noting that this hearing loss is permanent.

Prolonged loud sound exposure can also cause tinnitus or ringing in the ears, in addition to hearing loss, according to Lin.

So, what noise level is best?

According to the National Institutes of Health, you’re likely safe from hearing damage if you’re around sounds that are 70 decibels or less; 70 decibels is roughly equivalent to a conversation or the sound of a washing machine.

Advertisement

In workplaces, people exposed to noise at 85 decibels or above are advised to wear hearing protection.

How can you tell what decibel level your music and calls come in at? Many phones and smartwatches tell you when your volume is at an unsafe level. There are also apps and websites that help measure noise levels.

But the most reliable way to understand the volume of your music is by visiting an audiologist, Bixler noted.

“We can’t always just trust our ear to know what’s a safe level [of sound],” Bixler said.

Advertisement

An audiologist can help measure the level of sound that’s being played out of your headphones.

“We can measure the level of the sound in the ear canal,” Bixler said. “I’ve had a number of patients in more recent years actually come in to see me and have this procedure done so we know where to set safe [limits].”

Most devices you’re streaming sound from have parental locks you can set for yourself so your sound doesn’t go above a certain level, Bixler added. “I think the best thing that most people can do is take a look at any streaming device they’re using and set a nice limit for themselves.”

You won’t notice hearing loss right away, but ringing in the ears and a feeling of fullness in the ears are signs that you should see a doctor.

Advertisement

It’s not like listening to too-loud music will cause you immediate and noticeable hearing loss. Instead, “sound-induced hearing loss is gradual,” Palmer said.

There are signs of hearing loss you should know about, including a feeling of fullness in the ears, ringing in the ears, and, of course, diminished hearing. “These are all signs of noise-induced hearing loss, and you should manage your exposure as well as seek a baseline hearing test from an audiologist,” Palmer said.

An audiologist can help you reduce your noise exposure and also take steps to protect your hearing throughout your life.

“You want to be preemptive in thinking about your dose of sound over time,” Palmer said.

Advertisement

While listening to music or taking calls on headphones isn’t any more damaging than doing so through a computer or kitchen speaker, any sound exposure that’s too loud or too long can be harmful.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025