We’ve had two nights of handball controversy, first involving Bayern Munich and now Arsenal.

In both cases, the ball took a deflection off the body before hitting the arm, and fans have been conditioned into thinking this means there cannot be a penalty.

What referees actually look for is a clear change of trajectory. Why is that? Because it means the arm position would not create a barrier to the natural direction of the ball.

If the ball stays on roughly its intended path, then the ball touching the arm takes precedent.

The penalty given against Alphonso Davies on Tuesday would not have been awarded in the Premier League as the arm was too close to the body.

For Uefa, the fact that the arm moves out from the body before the ball hits it would trump the small deflection.

But Ben White’s handball against Atletico was a very clear penalty under Uefa’s definition. The arm was a long way out from the body and came in to make contact with the ball.

There is some discretion if the arm is being brought in to make the body smaller, but in White’s case it started from so far out, a penalty would be expected.

The Premier League is more relaxed than Europe even when it comes to deflections before a handball. That said, Arsenal defender Gabriel should have really conceded a penalty at Newcastle earlier this season as his arm, when sliding, was raised very high and the deflection off the body was negligible.

Would the ball deflecting off White’s shin have caused VAR to stay out of this in the Premier League? Possibly, but the movement of the arm was very clear.

A definite spot-kick in Europe, borderline for the Premier League.

Other members of the public, alongside nightclub security, were forced to step in and Kerr was restrained on the ground until police arrived.

A drunk Scot had to be restrained after threatening to “take a man’s face off” outside a popular nightclub.

Liam Kerr, 44, from Edinburgh, was ‘heavily intoxicated’ outside The Liquid Rooms on Victoria Street during the early hours of September 12, 2025.

Kerr was trying to engage with other people outside the club at around 2am, Edinburgh Sheriff Court heard on Wednesday, reports Edinburgh Live.

Kerr and another man then had some sort of disagreement which saw him push the man on the body and act aggressively. He then uttered threats, including telling the man “I will take your face off.”

Other members of the public, alongside nightclub security, were forced to step in and Kerr was restrained on the ground until police arrived. He was taken to St Leonard’s Police Station.

Kerr, who has several previous convictions, pleaded guilty to threatening or abusive behaviour by shouting, swearing, uttering threats of violence and pushing the victim on the body.

He had pleas of not guilty accepted for an assault charge and a separate charge of threatening or abusive behaviour.

Sheriff Stirling imposed a fine of £150 on Kerr, discounted from £200 due to his early plea.

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE

Anusuyabai Pandekar and her daughter-in-law Mandabai sit facing each other beside a stone grindmill. The mill is still. No grain rests between its stones. No flour gathers at the edges. Instead it sits between them like an object from another time.

One of the women begins to sing. The other joins. The melody carries the rhythm of a labour no longer being done, cyclical and without clear beginning or end:

It is raining heavily, let the soil become wet.

Women go to the fields, carrying baskets of bhakri (bread).

The pre-monsoon rain is beating down on the fields.

Advertisement

Under the jasmine tree, the ploughman is working with the drill-plough.

Scenes like the one this song describes, once common across rural western India, now belong increasingly to the archive. Hand-grinding has given way to electric mills. The work that once informed these songs has thinned out, leaving behind recordings, fragments and memory.

Accounts of drought and environmental change rarely include such voices. In official records and news reports, what is measured often overshadows what is lived. Climate change is typically explained through numbers, including emissions targets, temperature thresholds and rainfall variability. This data is necessary. But it cannot capture how change is inhabited: how it settles into bodies, reshapes routines and presses into everyday life.

Long before climate science named the crisis, women were registering these shifts in another language – song.

Climate, labour and everyday life

Across the world, women’s work songs function as informal archives of environmental change. Emerging from repetitive labour – including grinding, pounding, planting and carrying – they register shifts in seasons, resources and survival long before these enter formal records.

I began to understand this during my doctoral work in 2020 and 2021. I was researching labour arrangements within the sugar industry in drought-affected regions of western India. Policy reports described rainfall deficits, groundwater depletion and crop loss. But women spoke instead of work – walking further for water, delaying planting and stretching food across uncertain seasons.

Their voices extended beyond conversation into an unexpected archive – The Grindmill Songs Project. First documented in the 1990s and now hosted by the People’s Archive of Rural India, the project brings together around 100,000 songs organised by people, places and themes. I used this archive alongside ethnographic interviews to trace labour, marriage and drought in the sugarcane industry, where women’s voices were largely absent from official records.

Here, labour and environmental strain were articulated with a precision often absent from formal accounts. Climate was not abstract; it was embedded in the rhythms of work.

The climate crisis has a communications problem. How do we tell stories that move people – not just to fear the future, but to imagine and build a better one? This article is part of Climate Storytelling, a series exploring how arts and science can join forces to spark understanding, hope and action.

The water-guzzling sugarcane crop, around which the region’s economy turns, surfaced repeatedly in both speech and song. It appeared as a metaphor for happiness, for domestic violence, even for dowry; a substance moving between fields and households, binding labour, desire and coercion. Environmental stress did not stand apart from these concerns, but moved through them. As one song goes:

A daughter’s existence is like a sack of sugar

Father got his daughter married, he became a merchant

Another describes married life through the language of extraction:

Father says, daughter, how are you treated by your in-laws

Like a 12-year-old sugarcane crushed in the sugar-mill

A broader pattern emerges from this context. Across regions, environmental change is first encountered through its effects on labour, and only later abstracted into data. Comparable dynamics appear elsewhere. In west African farming communities, songs synchronise collective labour while expressing shared experience of seasonal uncertainty. In Malawi, during famine, women sang:

Koke kolole … pull, pull hard, pull the clouds –

why does the rain not come?

Our dead fathers, what have we done?

Forgive us … do you want us to die?

Send us rain.

Advertisement

Here, ecological crisis is framed as a breakdown within a moral and social order. Such songs interpret environmental failure through relationships between the living and the dead and between obligation and neglect.

On the Swahili coast, fishing songs similarly accompany sailing and net-making, embedding weather knowledge, labour discipline and social commentary within everyday maritime life. These songs accompany work, but they also organise it, giving rhythm to collective effort while encoding knowledge about seasons, risk and survival.

This relationship between labour and environment extends across very different histories. In the Caribbean, work songs bear the imprint of plantation economies shaped by extraction and environmental vulnerability. In Latin America, women’s traditions carry histories of colonial labour within their rhythms.

In Colombia’s San Basilio de Palenque, women still sing as they coax peanuts from rain-softened soil, gathering food, language and memory in the same gesture. Elsewhere, songs track movement itself: young men leaving with the dry-season wind, rivers in flood separating families.

Along cold North Sea coasts, herring workers, known as the “gutters”, sang Gaelic work songs in the 19th century while gutting fish at speed, their rhythms coordinating labour under harsh conditions. Beyond work, women also composed laments that dwelt on separation from men at sea.

Listening to climate differently

These songs describe hardship. But they also make it perceptible, situating environmental stress within labour, social relations and obligation. Climate change follows existing inequalities. In many contexts, its earliest effects are absorbed through women’s work, through longer hours, shifting responsibilities and increased strain.

Importantly, these songs were not intentionally composed as records of environmental change. They emerge from labour, relationships and survival. Yet because women’s work is so closely tied to land, water and season, environmental shifts are registered within them, often indirectly, as part of their lived experience.

Work songs therefore offer a distinct kind of record. Against archives that have historically privileged elite and male voices, they preserve forms of knowledge grounded in everyday labour.

But the conditions that sustained such singing are fading. Mechanisation and the decline of collective work have reduced the spaces in which these songs were produced and shared, with many now confined to ritual settings such as weddings and childbirth gatherings. As these practices decline, so too do the forms of knowledge embedded within them.

Listening to these songs does not replace data-driven, scientific knowledge about climate change. It complements it by making visible dimensions of change that are otherwise difficult to capture, including the reorganisation of labour, the strain on relationships and the uncertainty of survival.

Viktor Gyokeres puts Arsenal ahead from the spot before an equalising penalty from Atletico Madrid’s Julian Alvarez in the second half. A third penalty call for the Gunners is overturned by VAR which ensures the first leg of their Champions League semi-final ends in a 1-1 draw.

MATCH REPORT: Champions League Semi-final – Atletico Madrid 1-1 Arsenal

Available to UK users only.

The easy hack, which takes just a few clicks, has been doing the rounds on social media this week.

And bargain hunters are loving it, as reported by creatorzine.com.

Many reckon it’s one of the quickest loyalty wins out there right now, with points landing almost instantly.

UK supermarket rankings in 2026

The trick was shared on Reddit, where a post on the r/UKFrugal thread revealed how one savvy user bagged 500 Nectar points with barely any effort.

The post, from MovieMore4352, read: “Check your emails from Nectar.

“I’ve just been given 500 Nectar points for simply registering with Marriott Bonvoy. Easy and took seconds.”

The deal is part of Nectar’s tie-up with Marriott Bonvoy, letting members link accounts, swap points and unlock bonus rewards across both schemes.

Through the partnership, shoppers can trade points for hotel stays, experiences and travel perks while also earning extras just for signing up or staying at participating hotels.

New Marriott Bonvoy members who sign up via Nectar can pocket a 500-point bonus – worth about £2.50 – simply by linking their account, with even more points up for grabs on hotel stays.

Some shoppers initially thought they had to book a trip to qualify but later realised the sign-up alone could trigger the bonus.

(Image: Jam Press/Reddit)

Others rushed to try it, with many saying it worked straight away.

One user wrote: “Thank you, this worked for me just now!”

Another user said: “Thank you! Just did it and got points immediately.”

A third of person added: “That was surprisingly painless. Thanks a lot for sharing.”

Others shared tips for those who didn’t get the email – pointing out the offer can also be found in the Nectar app.

One user wrote: “I didn’t get the email… but it was also listed under ‘Partner Offers’ in the Nectar app with a link that takes you straight there.”

A new petition wants to ‘ensure that welfare money is being spent on essentials’ amid concerns over welfare spending

A fresh online petition is calling on the UK Government to “ensure that welfare money is being spent on essentials to help those in need” by abolishing cash payments for benefit recipients and introducing an alternative support mechanism.

Petition organiser Dewald Meiring is proposing the introduction of a ‘payment card’ which can “only be used for things like food, clothes, school supplies etc”. He stated: “We are concerned that the taxpayer could be funding non-essential items for those who rely on the state for support.”

The ‘Introduce a benefits payment card that can be used for essentials only’ petition has been published on the Petitions Parliament website. Upon reaching 10,000 signatures it will receive a written response from the UK Government, and at 100,000 signatures, the Petitions Committee would consider it for parliamentary debate.

Throughout the 2025/26 financial year, the UK Government is projected to allocate £323.1 billion towards the social security system in Great Britain. Overall welfare expenditure is projected to represent 10.6 per cent of GDP and 23.6 per cent of total government spending in 2025 to 2026.

Approximately 55 per cent of social security expenditure is directed towards pensioners; in 2025 to 2026 the government will allocate £177.8 billion on benefits for pensioners in Great Britain. This encompasses State Pension spending, which is projected to reach £146.1 billion in 2025/26. The Labour Government will also allocate £145.3 billion towards working age and child welfare. This encompasses expenditure on Universal Credit and its predecessors, alongside non-DWP welfare spending, reports the Daily Record.

In the current financial year, which ends on April 5, it will additionally allocate £76.9 billion on benefits supporting disabled people and those with health conditions, plus £37.8 billion on housing benefits.

Over 24 million people throughout Great Britain receive at least one benefit. This includes:

• 8.4 million people on Universal Credit
• 13 million older people in receipt of the State Pension – classed as a contributory benefit
• 3.9 million people on Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

While in office, the Conservatives put forward proposals to replace PIP cash payments – valued at up to £749.80 per month – with vouchers, which sparked considerable opposition from charities, campaigners and rival political parties.

The Labour Government is presently reviewing PIP eligibility and has confirmed it will not substitute cash payments with vouchers, meaning a shift towards a ‘payment card’ would be extremely improbable.

Universal Credit is a means-tested benefit designed to assist people in low-paid employment and those without work, covering everyday living expenses. A ‘payment card’ with restricted spending options would create its own difficulties, as everyone’s requirements differ. The State Pension is a contributory benefit, with the amount received dependent upon the National Insurance Contributions made throughout an individual’s working life. Restricting pensioners to a payment card appears impractical, given that their daily requirements may well differ from those of working-age individuals — and by all accounts, they have spent their lives as taxpayers, effectively funding their own retirement.

PIP is a tax-free, non-means-tested benefit available to those living with a disability, long-term illness, or physical or mental health condition. The payment can assist recipients with the additional costs of daily living and/or mobility requirements.

You can view the petition online here.

Writing for Belfast Live, South Down MP Chris Hazzard argues that Stormont is being asked to manage decline while an insulated Whitehall watches from the sidelines.

Earlier this month, the British Secretary of State Hilary Benn arrived in Kilkeel Harbour to meet a fishing industry in crisis. He heard of soaring fuel costs and a crewing shortage that threatens to dry‑dock a generational way of life. While he acknowledged their difficulties, his message remained fixed to a familiar Treasury script: the Stormont Executive has received a “record settlement,” and it is now up to local ministers to manage it. To repeat this line to people watching their livelihoods slip away is to expose a profound disconnect between Whitehall mathematics and the reality on the ground. It is a fiscal illusion that depends on the public not looking past the headline figure to see a British Treasury-controlled system being slowly strangled by real‑terms cuts, a decaying spending baseline, and a decade‑long refusal to invest in the basic infrastructure of a modern state.

The Treasury’s preferred trick is to speak only in cash terms. An £18.2 billion block grant sounds like a windfall until inflation is accounted for. The NI Fiscal Council has shown that while the settlement is 2.6 per cent larger in cash, it amounts to just 0.2 per cent growth in real terms. And even that microscopic increase is fragile. If the Executive is required to repay previous overspends, the budget would actually shrink by 3 per cent in real terms. The deeper problem lies in the benchmark used to judge “fairness.” Funding here is tied to public spending in England through the Barnett Formula, and the Treasury insists that because Stormont receives 124 per cent of English spending, it is somehow overfunded. But that logic only holds if spending levels in England are themselves adequate. They are not. Across the water, the English baseline for public services is in a state of managed decline. That is a direct result of political choices. The British government has chosen military spending and weapons of war over the health and well-being of their own people. As a result, NHS England is grappling with a £13.8 billion maintenance backlog, while schools face a further £13 billion in essential repairs. Only last month, the Annual Local Authority Road Maintenance survey revealed that local roads in England are now resurfaced just once every 97 years. Britain sits at the bottom of the G7 for total investment, and even the quality of its bathing waters – rated five times worse than the European average – reflects decades of capital neglect that have earned it the label of “the dirty man of Europe.” This decay is no longer an abstract policy debate; it is a live political crisis. It is one reason why parties such as the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens are tipped for major breakthroughs in next month’s elections. Voters across the water are on the verge of revolting against a system that prioritises fiscal optics over functional infrastructure. When the British Government tells Belfast to “live within its means,” it is benchmarking local services against an English system that is itself on starvation rations. Brexit has only sharpened the squeeze. Imposed without a mandate in the north, it has stripped away EU structural funds that once underpinned community development and peace‑building initiatives. Replacement schemes designed in Whitehall have failed to match either the scale or the certainty of what was lost. Fishing and coastal communities in Co Down who once received 10 per cent of Britian’s share of Europe’s Maritime & Fisheries Fund, are now to receive less than 3 per cent of Westminster’s new replacement scheme. The British Government has placed a ceiling on economic growth while simultaneously tightening the purse strings. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of this fiscal theatre is the role played by some within the local media and political establishment. Rather than scrutinising the systemic underfunding that is choking public services, a chorus of voices – including the Leader of the Opposition at Stormont – merely echoes the Treasury’s “record funding” line. Indeed, for a Leader of the Opposition who previously served as a Downing Street press officer, it often feels as though old habits die hard. Acting as a regional megaphone for Westminster talking points does not inform the public; it validates a false narrative of local incompetence and shields the British Government from accountability. Meanwhile, the Northern Ireland Office continues to urge MLAs to make “tough decisions” – a euphemism for cuts or imposing charges. This framing ignores a basic constitutional reality: local representatives are not accountants. They are elected with a duty of care to protect the health and wellbeing of their citizens. MLAs are right to resist decisions that would lengthen waiting lists, introduce water charges, increase tuition fees or strip support from vulnerable children simply to satisfy a Treasury spreadsheet. Closing a facility without the capital to provide a better alternative is not leadership. It is a dereliction of duty. Stormont is being asked to manage decline while an insulated Whitehall watches from the sidelines. As Britain continues its retreat from public investment, it is clear that more people in the north of Ireland are looking south. The Shared Island Fund has already stepped in to support projects the Treasury has neglected – from the Narrow Water Bridge to cross‑border environmental and educational schemes. This is not just tactical financial support; it reflects a growing recognition that the current fiscal framework is fundamentally broken. On an island where one jurisdiction is navigating multi‑billion‑euro surpluses while the other is lectured on “tough decisions” by a neighbour in visible decline, it is no surprise that the economic argument for constitutional change is increasingly being framed as a matter of basic survival. The “record settlement” narrative may be a masterpiece of political framing, but it fails the test of economic honesty. It ignores the soaring costs of modern governance, the inadequacy of the Treasury’s spending baseline, the fallout of Brexit, and the British state’s chronic refusal to invest in the future. Whether it is fishermen in Kilkeel or families waiting for life-changing surgery, people deserve a conversation based on need, not on misleading historical comparisons. It is time to stop talking about “record settlements” and start talking about the actual cost of a functioning society. One is a headline; the other is a necessity.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Janet Gee said Jamie Varley, 37, who she worked with at a high school, allegedly told her he was struggling to cope with looking after the baby, 13-month-old Preston Davey, he had adopted with his partner John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32.

The baby died less than four months after being placed with the couple in Blackpool. Varley is now on trial at Preston Crown Court accused of sexual abuse and murder.

Mrs Gee said on one occasion, Varley arrived at her house with the baby, very flustered and agitated with Preston having a blue plaster cast on his arm, a court heard.

Mrs Gee said: “He told me how he was having harmful thoughts towards the baby in terms of drowning or suffocation.

“He was still agitated at this point.

“He was very quick to say this was something he was not going to act upon.

“I believed him, I have children of my own and sometimes your thoughts go to dark places.”

Mrs Gee said Varley told her he had been putting the baby down and dropped him by accident, causing the injury to his arm.

But after Preston’s death, Mrs Gee alleges that Varley gave a different explanation for the injury, the court heard.

She said: “The inconsistency was around the cot, the first instance was he dropped him, the second was he had his arm out of the cot and hurt it. So, no consistency.”

Preston Davey was born on June 16, 2022, and taken into care by Oldham Council, and placed with foster parents at five days old.

After an adoption assessment, he moved in with Varley and McGowan-Fazakerley on April 1, 2023.

Varley, who worked as a design and technology technician at South Shore Academy in Blackpool before training to become a teacher, took a year off to care for Preston.

During the months leading up to Preston’s death, it is alleged that he was routinely abused, with indecent images and videos reportedly taken of him.

The prosecution claims the child suffered 40 traumatic injuries.

Preston was taken to hospital three times in the months before his death, including once for a fractured left elbow.

On July 27, 2023, Preston was taken to hospital unconscious and in cardiac arrest and could not be revived.

Varley allegedly told Mrs Gee he had left the child in the bath to fetch a towel and returned to find Preston face down in the water.

She said: “It was as soon as I made contact, he said, ‘Jan, I promise you, I didn’t do anything’ and went on to give an account of that day.”

The court heard that medical staff at Blackpool Victoria Infirmary found the child dry, with dry hair and no signs of having swallowed water.

A Home Office post-mortem examination found multiple non-accidental, internal and external injuries.

There were bruises and grazes to his head, face and mouth, upper limbs, chest, back and left thigh.

Preston also had injuries to his mouth, throat and bottom.

There was no evidence to support drowning, the court heard, and a pathologist gave the cause of death as acute upper airways obstruction by either smothering or an object or objects inserted into his mouth.

Varley denies murder, manslaughter, two counts of assault by penetration, five counts of cruelty to a child, grievous bodily harm, sexual assault of a child, 13 counts of taking indecent photos or videos of a child, one of distributing an indecent photo of a child, to his co-accused, and one of making an indecent photo.

McGowan-Fazakerley denies allowing the death of a child, three counts of child cruelty and one count of the sexual assault of a child.

The trial has been adjourned until Thursday morning.

Grillicious Peri Chicken, located on Linthorpe Road, Middlesbrough, saw its rating of zero – the worst possible outcome – change to a four star rating just two months later after addressing raw chicken problems, amongst others.

The initial inspection that saw the establishment slapped with the lowest possible rating – urgent improvement necessary – was undertaken on December 16, 2025.

Concerns highlighted in the inspector’s report included “significant structural issues” and an “imminent risk of injury to health”. The premises was “voluntarily” closed and a week later, on December 23, a revisit was carried out, at which point approval to reopen was granted.

Two months later, on February 26, a re-rating was undertaken, which described standards as improving since the previous visit, while a few structural items needed “to be addressed”.

The four star rating translates as “good” in the latest report, and is one ranking away from the highest possible rating of five.

Inspections were carried out by Middlesbrough Council officers, who were concerned by what they found in their initial December inspection.

Various issues were criticised, such as water from an “unidentified source” leaking from the ceiling onto surfaces and equipment in the food preparation area, presenting a “serious risk” of contamination, while the ceiling was described as being in a “state of disrepair”.

Raw chicken was also identified as not being safely thawed – presenting a risk of bacterial growth.

Other issues included pizza boxes being stored uncovered “in direct contact” with raw egg shells, while cooked chicken was being stored next to raw, marinated chicken. 26 items/areas were described as being dirty, including the griddle, shelf surfaces in the food rooms, and work benches used to prepare food.

There was no soap at the washbasin of the staff toilet, and the gully in the rear yard was blocked, causing “an accumulation of waste water and food waste”, the report explained.

With regards to health and safety on the Middlebsrough premises, water was described as “leaking through the light fittings”, while the boiler was “in a poor state of repair”.

On a more positive note, the food standards – regarding labelling and presentation of food – was deemed satisfactory across the board.

By the time of the re-rating, in February this year, hygiene practices were rated as good, although one concern raised by inspectors was there was a suitcase stored within the cooked chicken preparation area, described as a “source of potential contamination”.

The cleanliness and condition of the premises, equipment and facilities was rated as satisfactory, as concerns included a peeling wall surface, a dirty toilet door and a build up of carbon and grease within the extraction canopy ducting.

A good level of compliance was found within the management of food safety category and this contributed to the overall four star rating that Grillicious now sits with.

The establishment serves kebabs, parmos and all things peri-chicken and was contacted for comment.