NEW YORK (AP) — Singer-songwriter Darrell “Dash” Crofts, who teamed with childhood friend Jim Seals for such 1970s soft-rock hits as “Summer Breeze,” “Diamond Girl” and “Get Closer,” has died. He was 87.
Crofts died Wednesday of heart failure at the Heart Hospital of Austin in Austin, Texas, said his daughter, Lua Crofts Faragher. She said her father had been suffering heart issues for several years and had been hospitalized for about a month.
Seals and Crofts were native Texans who had known each other since high school and played together in various groups before becoming a duo, Seals & Crofts, in the late 1960s. Blending pop, country, folk and jazz, they were part of a wave of million-selling soft-rock (or “easy listening”) bands that included America, Bread and Loggins and Messina.
“Summer Breeze,” “Diamond Girl” and “Get Closer” all reached the Top 10, while their other popular singles included “I’ll Play for You,” “Hummingbird” and “We May Never Pass This Way (Again).” The wide-eyed sentiments of the latter made it a favorite for high school yearbooks:
Advertisement
“Life / So they say / Is but a game and they’d let it slip away / Love / Like the autumn sun / Should be dyin’ / But it’s only just begun.”
Not always easy listening
Like many bands of the era, Seals & Crofts sang of love, peace, music and the natural world. But the inspirations were rooted less in the counterculture than in the Baha’i faith, a monotheistic religion advocating global unity that they both embraced in the 1960s.
“It became a driving force in their careers and the way they lived their lives,” Faragher said.
They worked Baha’i themes into their music — “Hummingbird” is a metaphor for the Baha’i prophet Bahaullah — distributed literature after their shows, and sometimes preached from the stage, including during a performance on “Tonight” with Johnny Carson.
Advertisement
“You start out writing songs like ‘the leaves are green and the sky is blue and I love you and you love me’ — very simple lyrics — but you grow into a much, much broader awareness of life, of love, and of unity,” Crofts told Stereo Review in 1971. “It’s really great to be able to say something real in your music.”
One Baha’i tenet, that the soul begins with the formation of the embryo, led to controversy. In 1974, the year after the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision established the right to abortion, Seals & Crofts released the ballad “Unborn Child,” the title song of their new album.
It was inspired by the wife of their recording engineer, who had seen a television documentary about abortion and wrote a poem with such lines as “Oh tiny bud, that grows in the womb, only to be crushed before you can bloom.” Numerous radio stations refused to play “Unborn Child” and protesters picketed Seals & Crofts, although the album was certified gold for selling 500,000 copies.
“I think we got more good results out of it than bad,” Crofts later told the St. Petersburg Press, “because a lot of people called us and said, ‘We’re naming our children after you, because you helped us decide to save their lives with that song.’ That was very fulfilling to us.”
Advertisement
By the early 1980s, soft-rock bands were out of fashion and Seals & Crofts had been dropped by its label, Warner Bros. They broke up for a time but continued to appear together at Baha’i gatherings, while also recording on their own. Crofts released a solo album, “Today,” in 1998, and six years later reunited with Seals for “Traces.” More recently, their music was revived by Faragher and Seals’ cousin Brady, who toured together as Seals & Crofts 2. (Jim Seals died in 2022).
“There’s not a time that we performed that we didn’t have hundreds of people coming up and expressing their love and often saying the music changed their life,” Faragher said.
“There were so many people who loved them,” she added. “They were a constant service to mankind.” She said that her father’s death, a few years after that of Seals, marked the end of an era.
“That’s what makes it so painful — that it’s the end,” she said. “But the music will always, always live on.”
Advertisement
Long-awaited breakthrough
Darrell George “Dash” Crofts was born in Cisco, Texas, in 1938 and was singing and playing music from an early age, eventually learning piano, guitar, drums and mandolin.
He met and befriended Seals when both were teenagers and in a local rockabilly band, the Crew Cats. By the end of the 1950s, they had moved to Los Angeles and joined The Champs, best known for the early rock hit “Tequila.” Seals and Crofts would later briefly play in a band led by Glen Campbell, and join another California group, the Dawnbreakers, whose members included Crofts’ future wife, Billie Lee Day.
Although they performed on the same bill as Eric Clapton and Deep Purple among others, they were turned off by the volume and the lifestyle of hard-rock performers and honed a gentle sound. Seals & Crofts released their eponymous debut album in 1969, and soon followed with “Down Home” and “Year of Sunday.”
Their commercial breakthrough came in 1972 with “Summer Breeze,” which featured a chorus that ranked with a contemporary hit, the Eagles’ “Take it Easy,” as a definition of post-1960s escapism: “Summer breeze makes me feel fine/blowing through the jasmine of my mind.”
Advertisement
“That was the beginning of bigger concerts, bigger crowds and we kept getting hits in the Top 40,” Crofts told the podcast “Inside MusiCast” in 2021. “That cemented us in the music business.”
Crofts is survived by his second wife, Louise Crofts; his children Lua, Faizi and Amelia; and eight grandchildren, Faragher said. His first marriage ended in divorce.
Theo has been abusing Todd since the beginning of their relationship last year, but so far the only person to learn the full extent of it has been Billy Mayhew.
After Todd confided in the vicar, Theo left him to die in the Corriedale pile-up to silence him and keep Todd trapped in their relationship.
Things have continued to escalate since then, until Theo unexpectedly called things off after threatening Todd with a knife.
Following the ceremony, George was put out about not having been invited, and suggested to Summer Spellman (Harriet Bibby) that perhaps Todd hadn’t had much of a say in organising the event.
Theo has been abusing Todd Grimshaw (Picture: ITV)
Tonight, his fears were confirmed when he paid Todd a visit, only for Theo to arrive home while Todd had nipped out.
Having been for a run to cool off after Todd turned him down for sex, Theo’s mood clearly hadn’t improved by the time he got back.
Believing that it was Todd in the bathroom, Theo continued to make vile comments about Todd’s weight and his refusal to have sex again that morning.
Advertisement
However, when Todd returned home and George emerged from the bathroom, Theo played it all off as a joke.
George made a vow to get Todd away from Theo (Picture: ITV)
George relayed the experience to Summer, sharing his concerns that Todd hadn’t been himself for months.
Don’t miss a Soaps scoop! Add us as a Preferred Source
As a loyal Metro Soaps reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for stories. We have all the latest soaps news, spoilers, videos, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.
Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.
Two second half goals undid all the good work but Northern Ireland were missing a number of key players
Michael O’Neill believes his young Northern Ireland side will only be better for the experience after a 2-0 defeat to Italy in their World Cup semi-final play-off in Bergamo.
Advertisement
O’Neill had stated that the squad is further on in their development than he’d expected at this stage and there was certainly no shame in losing to an Azzurri side that they kept at bay in a tense first half at the New Balance Arena.
“I couldn’t ask any more from the players, I thought our game plan in the first half was excellent,” said the 56-year-old, who was without the likes of Conor Bradley and Daniel Ballard for the crunch game..
“We limited Italy to very few chances in the first half.
“Ultimately in the second half we caused our own problems.
Advertisement
“We had a couple of nervous moments before the first goal. We were out of shape, it’s not a great header and it lands to the wrong man in Sandro Tonali, who strikes a great ball.
“Once you’re behind in the game it’s difficult.
“But I thought our attitude throughout was terrific.
“It’s a very young team, I think the average age is 22 years of age, so it is incredibly positive for us to come here, against a team like Italy, and take them to the 90th minute before they feel they’re safe.
Advertisement
“We only had one player out there over the age of 24 and that says a lot.
“We showed great character. I thought all the younger players were terrific in the game.
“Regardless of the result, we took a step forward in terms of the progress of the team.
“It’s very difficult to come away here to Italy, especially with the players we had missing.
A Los Angeles jury has delivered a landmark verdict: Meta and YouTube were negligent in the design and operation of their platforms, causing a young woman known in court documents as Kaley, or KGM, to become addicted to social media.
The tech giants must now pay her a total of US$6 million in damages – $3 million compensatory and $3 million punitive.
She claimed the platforms’ design features got her addicted to the technology and exacerbated her depression, anxiety, body dysmorphia and suicidal thoughts.
The jury found that Meta bore 70% of the responsibility and YouTube 30%, meaning Meta will pay $4.2 million and Google’s YouTube $1.8 million. Both companies have said they will appeal.
Advertisement
The verdict came a day after a separate New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay US$375 million for failing to protect children from predators on Instagram and Facebook.
Kaley filed her lawsuit in 2023, when she was 17. She claimed that she began using social media as a young child and alleged that features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, algorithmically timed notifications and beauty filters were addictive.
TikTok and Snap were originally named as defendants but settled before the trial began for undisclosed sums. Meta and YouTube proceeded to a seven-week trial in Los Angeles Superior Court.
The case is the first of three bellwether trials scheduled in the California state proceedings – test cases selected to gauge how juries respond to the core legal arguments – drawn from a pool of more than 1,600 plaintiffs, including over 350 families and 250 school districts.
Advertisement
The outcome of this first trial was always likely to have consequences far beyond one young woman’s case.
Bypassing big tech’s legal shield
The legal strategy that made this trial possible was a deliberate departure from previous attempts to sue social media companies. Historically, platforms have been shielded by Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects internet companies from liability for content posted by their users.
The plaintiff’s lawyers sidestepped this entirely by arguing that the harm arose not from what users posted, but from how the platforms were engineered – treating Instagram and YouTube as defective products rather than neutral publishers.
The jury heard internal Meta documents that proved damaging. One memo read: “If we wanna win big with teens, we must bring them in as tweens.” Another showed that 11-year-olds were four times as likely to keep returning to Instagram compared with competing apps, despite the platform’s own minimum age requirement of 13.
Advertisement
Mark Lanier, attorney for Kaley, addressed the media after the jury reached their verdict. TED SOQUI
A former Meta engineering director turned whistleblower, Arturo Béjar, testified about how features like infinite scroll exploit the brain’s reward system. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg himself took the stand – his first jury testimony on child safety – and was questioned about his decision to retain beauty filters despite internal research flagging their impact on young girls’ body image.
The jury rejected the companies’ central defence: that Kaley’s struggles were primarily the result of a difficult home life and pre-existing conditions rather than platform design.
In finding that the companies had acted with “malice, oppression or fraud”, they opened the door to the additional punitive damages that brought the total to US$6 million.
Both companies will appeal, and the process could take years. In the meantime, a second important trial is scheduled for this summer, and a separate federal case in Oakland involving school districts is also advancing. The pressure on platforms to settle the thousands of remaining cases will grow considerably.
Advertisement
Long-term impact?
For users, the immediate practical picture is less clear. Meta and YouTube are unlikely to make significant changes to their platforms while the appeals process plays out. Any redesign – if it comes – is likely to be incremental and carefully managed to minimise disruption to the engagement model that drives their revenues.
But there is a harder question the verdict does not answer: will it actually change anything? Meta and YouTube are companies worth hundreds of billions of dollars. A US$6 million damages award is not going to restructure the attention- and surveillance-driven economy.
My research on digital overuse – based on in-depth interviews with digital users and studies of online communities discussing digital overuse and detox – shows that even people who are fully aware of the problem and genuinely want to reduce their screen time find it extraordinarily difficult to do so.
This is not because they lack willpower, but because the features driving compulsive use are not bugs in the system. They are the system, built to maximise engagement and advertising revenue.
Advertisement
For years, big tech has placed the burden of managing screen time squarely on individuals and parents – encouraging screen time limits, digital detoxes, and parental controls while continuing to engineer products specifically designed to defeat exactly that kind of self-regulation.
The jury has pushed back against that logic. Whether courts, regulators, and legislators will push hard enough to force genuine structural redesign remains to be seen. However, the European Commission has already made the preliminary finding that TikTok’s addictive design features are in breach of the EU’s Digital Services Act.
What this verdict does, at minimum, is shift the ground. For the first time, a jury has confirmed what researchers have argued for years: this is not a story of weak willpower or bad parenting. It is, at least in part, a story of deliberate product design. That matters – even if the real fight is still to come.
Mickeleate, close to its junction with North Street, has been temporarily closed by City of York Council.
Recommended reading:
Confirming this in a statement, a spokesperson said: “This morning our teams were inspecting Micklegate as part of our routine highways maintenance and discovered a void under the road.
“We’ve had to temporarily close the bottom of Micklegate to vehicles while we investigate, before the issue is fixed.
Advertisement
“Thanks for everyone’s patience while we urgently investigate.”
Pedestrians and cyclists will still be able to use the road, City of York Council has confirmed (Image: City of York Council)
Businesses along the road, the council said, will open as usual tomorrow, with pavements open to pedestrians and mobility aid users.
Cyclists will also be able to use the route, following signed diversions set up today.
There are mixed emotions ahead as a huge Emmerdale favourite heads off for a new life.
Tracy Shankley (Amy Walsh) gears up to whisk daughter Frankie away for a fresh start when an opportunity presents itself.
Actress Amy Walsh has left the soap to head off and have a baby, which means Tracy has to disappear, at least for a bit. And there comes the fresh start.
Lately, Tracy has been behaving hecking suspiciously in having weird and secretive phone calls – ditching her post in the shop to take a call with a friend, and completely ignoring Nicola King (Nicola Wheeler) in the pub while furiously typing on her phone. There’s something afoot.
Advertisement
Vanessa Woodfield (Michelle Hardwick) gets wind of this impending change and confronts Tracy when she learns that she plans to move house.
Tracy is looking for a fresh start (Picture: ITV)
After the year she’s had, it’s no wonder Tracy wants a fresh start. Husband Nate seemed to disappear of the face of the Earth in 2024 when he took up a job in Shetland and cut contact.
That’s a lot for anyone to process in the space of a year or so.
Tracy has had to navigate life a single, grieving mum who for a time was even estranged from daughter Frankie’s family and any kind of support. So now things are coming back around and she’s focusing back on herself. Good for her, sad for us.
Amy has now given birth to her little girl (Picture: Shutterstock/Amy Walsh/Instagram)
She’s packing up her and Frankie’s lives and heading out of the village, but with everything going on with Cain Dingle (Jeff Hordley), it looks like he might miss his granddaughter’s farewell. Will cancer-suffering Cain be dealt yet another blow by missing their final goodbye?
Don’t miss a Soaps scoop! Add us as a Preferred Source
As a loyal Metro Soaps reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for stories. We have all the latest soaps news, spoilers, videos, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.
Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.
The adorable picture she shared on her Instagram is of the little baby’s feet. In the caption, Amy announced to her followers that her daughter was actually born last week.
Advertisement
She wrote: ‘This time last week I was heading into established labour.
‘We’ve been in the most magical bubble ever since.’
After an encouraging first half, Michael O’Neill’s men ran out of steam and Sandro Tonali and Moise Kean scored to book their place in a play-off final next Tuesday
It was a disappointing night for Northern Ireland in Bergamo as two second half goals killed off their chances of reaching the World Cup.
Advertisement
After an encouraging first half, Michael O’Neill’s men ran out of steam and Sandro Tonali and Moise Kean scored to book their place in a play-off final next Tuesday.
Here is how the Nothern Ireland players rated in Bergamo:
Pierce Charles 7 – Made a series of fine saves but was powerless to keep out Tonali’s hammer blow.
Trai Hume 8 – A rugged and clever performance from the Northern Ireland captain on the night.
Advertisement
Paddy McNair 7 – As assured as always, using his experience to rally his younger colleagues throughout.
Ruairi McConville 6 – Big night for the 20-year-old and he mostly stood his ground, only to get done for the second goal.
Terry Devlin 5 – Had a tough time up against Dimarco. Will have better nights in a Northern Ireland shirt.
Shea Charles 7 – Played some tidy stuff when he could, dug in with a lot of heart when he couldn’t.
Advertisement
Ethan Galbraith 6 – His normally reliable radar was off, coughing up possession a little too easily at times.
Justin Devenney 6 – Did the hard yards all night and used his left foot to effect when the situation allowed.
Brodie Spencer 6 – Safe and secure as he mostly shut down the left side of the pitch.
Isaac Price 4 – Struggled to get into the game. Did little with whatever ball came his way.
Advertisement
Jamie Donley 6- A thankless task as he hared around trying to unsettle the Italian defence with limited service.
Subs: Paul Smyth 6 (68) for Devlin, Jamie Reid 6 (79) for Spencer, Josh Magennis 6 (79) for Donley,
G Donnarumma 7, R Calafiori 7, N Bastoni 6 (F Gatti 7, 63), G Mancini 7, F Dimarco 7, S Tonali 7, M Locatelli 7, N Barella 7, M Politano 6 (M Palestra 6, 83), M Retegui 5 P Esposito 7, M Kean 8 (Raspadori 6, 88)
Former Formula 1 champion Max Verstappen kicked a reporter out of a press conference ahead of Sunday’s Japanese Grand Prix.
The Red Bull driver, 28, refused to speak to journalists at the media session until The Guardian’s Giles Richards left the room.
Verstappen said: “One second, I’m not speaking before he’s leaving.”
The four-time world champion’s refusal dates back to a question he was asked following the 2025 F1 season finale in Abu Dhabi.
Advertisement
Back then, Mr Richards had asked the Dutchman about a collision with Mercedes driver George Russell at the Spanish Grand Prix on 1 June last year.
Gulf F1 races cancelled
Advertisement
The collision led to a 10-second penalty that knocked Verstappen down five places, costing him points.
Hitting back at the question at the time, Verstappen said: “You forget all the other stuff that happened in my season.
“The only thing you mention is Barcelona. I knew that [question] would come. You’re giving me a stupid grin now.
“I don’t know. Yeah, it’s part of racing at the end. You live and learn. The championship is one of 24 rounds. I’ve also had a lot of early Christmas presents given to me in the second half, so you can also question that.”
Advertisement
Image: Verstappen is a four-time world champion. Pic: Reuters
In Suzuka, Japan, on Thursday, after Verstappen asked him to leave, Mr Richards replied “seriously?”.
Verstappen replied: “Yeah.”
Mr Richards then asked: “Because of the question last year?”
Verstappen then answered “yeah”, before Mr Richards walked towards the driver’s table to collect his dictaphone.
Mr Richards then said: “It’s because of the question I asked you in Abu Dhabi?”
Advertisement
After a further exchange, Mr Richards asked: “You’re really, really upset about it?”
Verstappen said: “Get out, get out! Now we can start.”
What the reporter said about ‘smiling’ Verstappen
Writing about the exchange in The Guardian, Mr Richards said: “In the course of a brief 30-second exchange, he told me to ‘get out’, twice. I have never been asked to leave a press conference.”
He added: “Marching orders received, I duly departed. Verstappen had been smiling throughout the exchange. The day carried on; there are far more serious issues in the world than an F1 driver being cross with you.”
Colleagues were “universally shocked” by the incident, he added.
Recent reports have suggested that Sandro Tonali would be expected to leave Newcastle United if they failed to qualify for European football
Newcastle United’s rivals may have been put on alert after an update on Sandro Tonali, with reports suggesting the Italian could be allowed to leave Tyneside if the club fail to qualify for Europe. However, those claims have now been dismissed by Chronicle Live, who report that club officials insist any suggestion of such an agreement is ‘totally untrue.’
Advertisement
Tonali’s future has been the subject of speculation ahead of the summer, with reports linking him with moves to Manchester United and Arsenal. Fresh claims suggest United are preparing a bid, though Tonali remains under contract until 2028, meaning Newcastle are in a strong position to demand whatever fee they like.
It’s understood, however, that Tonali has no release clauses or agreements in his current deal with the club. Comments from his agent, Giuseppe Riso about his client’s prospects fuelled speculation.
Earlier this month, Riso said: “Tthat was the goal from the moment he went to England – to try to make him a star player.
Advertisement
“I think he’s the Italian footballer with one of the highest values in the world.
“If he shines at the World Cup, will Man City or Arsenal be hot on his heels? I don’t know, but it’s very likely.
“Everyone is waiting for the World Cup; then a thousand scenarios will unfold, but it all kicks off after the World Cup.”
Meanwhile, Newcastle boss Eddie Howe shot the rumour down last week, saying: “The person that matters the most is Sandro. All I’ve ever seen from him is someone who is totally committed.
“Very selfless at times, he’s here for the team, not for himself. Forget the noise around him, he’s just fully committed.”
Elsewhere, Tonali’s teammate Bruno Guimaraes has also attracted interest from United, with Howe describing claims that the Brazilian is in ‘advanced talks’ with the club as ‘disrespectful.’
England and Nike have launched the new home, away and goalkeeper kits to be worn at this summer’s FIFA World Cup. You can get free delivery on all orders with the code: ENGFREEDEL
Oil depots spewing black smoke. Debris sinking in the Persian Gulf. Missiles pounding military sites.
The Iran war has unleashed a toxic mix of chemicals, heavy metals and other pollutants that threaten everything from agriculture to drinking water to people’s health — and will leave behind environmental damage and health risks that could persist for decades, experts said.
“All the burning of oil and gas fields in the coastal areas, all the ships that are there, the oil tankers that are being burned or (sunk) — all of these mean pollution,” said Kaveh Madani, an Iranian scientist and director of the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health. “For someone like me who has fought for sustainability and protection of the environment in that region, this is like going many years backward.”
Documenting the damage has proved daunting, with a full accounting impossible for now, said Doug Weir, director of the Conflict and Environment Observatory, a U.K.-based nonprofit that monitors environmental harms from armed conflicts.
Advertisement
First responders inspect the remains of a residential building hit in an overnight strike during the U.S.-Israeli military campaign in Tabriz, Iran, March 24, 2026. (AP Photo/Matin Hashemi, File)
Advertisement
First responders inspect the remains of a residential building hit in an overnight strike during the U.S.-Israeli military campaign in Tabriz, Iran, March 24, 2026. (AP Photo/Matin Hashemi, File)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The group uses remote satellite sensing and open-source intelligence to identify damage and score environmental risks to people, ecosystems and agricultural land. So far, it has recorded more than 400 environmentally concerning incidents related to the war, though much is still unknown due to delays in satellite imagery and an internet blackout in Iran, Weir said.
Attacks on oil- and gas-related sites create some of the worst environmental risks because of impacts to air quality and soil and water pollution, as well as health threats to people. Harder to quantify are risks from bombed military sites, some of which are deeply buried and some near populated areas, adding to “huge uncertainties” around potential impacts, Weir said.
The air pollution unleashed could lead to many health problems
Advertisement
Plumes of smoke and fire rise after debris from an intercepted Iranian drone struck an oil facility, according to authorities, in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, March 14, 2026. (AP Photo/Altaf Qadri, File)
Plumes of smoke and fire rise after debris from an intercepted Iranian drone struck an oil facility, according to authorities, in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, March 14, 2026. (AP Photo/Altaf Qadri, File)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Perhaps the most enduring images of the war are of darkened skies from oil infrastructure set ablaze by airstrikes, including two weeks ago when black rain fell near Tehran, Iran’s capital.
Soot, ash and toxic chemicals from strikes on fuel depots and a refinery combined with water droplets in the atmosphere and fell back to Earth as an oily, acidic rain that prompted warnings to stay indoors. Microscopic soot raises risks of lung and heart problems, while toxic chemicals pose long-term cancer risks and heavy metals from the fallout could contaminate soil and water supplies, experts said.
Debris and contamination from missiles, as well as potential strikes on manufacturing facilities and other infrastructure also could unleash harmful pollution throughout the region, experts said.
Advertisement
“If you hit an ammonia-producing plant for fertilizer or for food production … those release chemicals that are absolutely toxic and harmful if they spread,” said Mohammed Mahmoud, head of Middle East Climate and Water Policy with the United Nations University Institute of Water, Environment and Health and founder of the Climate and Water Initiative.
Intensive fossil fuel emissions also are spiking levels of greenhouse gases that cause climate change, experts said. The carbon accounting platform Greenly estimated that the U.S. military alone released almost 2 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases in just the first six days of the war, meaning the actual amount generated by the fighting is certainly much higher, when accounting for Israeli and Iranian emissions and damage to infrastructure.
That is a significant amount in such a short time, as in an entire year around 50 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases are released around the entire world, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Global oil shortages also are causing some countries to resume or increase their use of coal, which creates more air pollution that hurts people, and more greenhouse gas emissions.
Advertisement
Continued access to clean water is a big concern
Countries in the arid Persian Gulf region rely on hundreds of desalination plants for drinking water, raising health and security risks if plants are damaged or water is polluted, experts say.
Iran has said a U.S airstrike damaged one of its desalination plants, while neighboring Bahrain accused Iran of damaging one of its plants. Experts fear more could be targeted the longer the war goes on.
People in the region “struggle with having access to clean drinking water, even at peace times,” said Madani, the Iranian scientist and U.N. official. “Any damage to water infrastructure can have long-lasting impacts.”
Weir worries that pollution, including oil, from sunken ships and other sources could clog desalination plants or that they could be knocked offline by attacks on power plants.
Advertisement
Experts say pollution also could damage fisheries and important ecosystems. Though some contaminants will be dispersed and diluted by water that moves through the gulf, heavy metals and toxic chemicals still could settle in sediment.
“It’s an enclosed basin, quite shallow,” Weir said. “There are sensitive habitats there, coral reefs, seagrass meadows, sensitive species which could be impacted.”
Nuclear risks are largely unknown
Advertisement
An Israeli soldier stands next to a fragment of a missile fired from Iran and intercepted by Israeli air defense system embedded in an open field in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights, March 19, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
An Israeli soldier stands next to a fragment of a missile fired from Iran and intercepted by Israeli air defense system embedded in an open field in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights, March 19, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The U.N. nuclear watchdog has not had access to Iranian nuclear sites, including facilities targeted in June by the United States and Israel, meaning their status is largely unknown.
Possible attacks on large and small nuclear sites throughout the region is “another thing to worry about,” because of immediate and long-term health and environmental impacts, said Madani. Exposure can cause skin damage and radiation sickness, while long-term risks include cancer, heart disease and genetic damage.
U.S. and Israeli officials have said one of the war’s aims is to destroy Iran’s ability to produce nuclear weapons.
Advertisement
After Israel and the U.S. this month bombed an Iranian uranium enrichment installation, Iran retaliated by firing missiles at two Israeli towns, including one with a nuclear research center. Israel said the facility wasn’t damaged.
“We are hearing that there is no major radiation or change in the level of pollutants so that makes us hopeful that nothing has gone wrong,” Madani said. “But the risk is always there.”
Addressing environmental damage could take decades
Advertisement
A thick plume of smoke rises from an oil storage facility hit by a U.S.-Israeli strike in Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)
A thick plume of smoke rises from an oil storage facility hit by a U.S.-Israeli strike in Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
After the war, as Iran and other countries rebuild, environmental damage could be a low priority, experts said.
The focus will be on energy and water infrastructure, manufacturing plants and food production facilities, Mahmoud said. Some pollution, especially to the gulf or other waterways, “I doubt will be addressed soon, and in some cases, not at all.”
Weir said environmental damage isn’t addressed properly after most conflicts because it’s expensive and “humanitarian needs come first,” even if environmental risks are high.
Advertisement
In densely populated Tehran, for example, a huge number of strikes have hit not just oil infrastructure, but also buildings and residential areas, generating harmful contamination from pulverized building materials. People are being exposed to dust and chemicals, which may continue for a long time after the war eventually ends and rebuilding begins.
___
The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
MOBO founder Kanya King CBE took to the stage to present the award to the British-American rapper and producer, saying Slick Rick redefined what it means to tell stories through music. Past winners of the converted award include Nile Rodgers, Michael Jackson and Lionel Richie.
The MOBOs founder said: “Thank you all for being here to celebrate this milestone MOBO. I feel so blessed to be standing here introducing the new honour. Ricky Walters, better known as Slick Rick.
Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.
“He redefined what it meant to tell stories through music. But what makes his story more powerful is not only what he created but what he overcame.”
Advertisement
She added: “True greatness finds a way. From the very beginning he brought a star swagger unlike anything we’ve heard before.”
Slick Rick himself took to the stage to accept the award. He said: “I don’t say much, but I’ve said enough to be here. I’ve never needed a lot of words, only the right ones. There were moments people didn’t understand, but I just kept going. Every step brought me to this moment.”
He continued: “I’ve always believed if you stay honest and true, the world will meet you there. And tonight it has. This is victory. Quiet, steady, undeniably timeless. Thank you.”
The 61-year-old rapper went on to shout out his mum and dad, Jamaicans, and his wife among other names. He also gave a shout-out to his hometown London.
Hosted by comedian Eddie Kadi and rapper Eve, the awards ceremony is playing host to a huge array of stars. These include Manchester’s own Aitch, alongside others such as Flo, Myles Smith, Tiwa Savage, Shenseea, and Slick Rick and Estelle.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login