City of York Council has approved Greene King’s application to refurbish the Windmill Inn, in Blossom Street.

The pub company’s plans stated the works would aim to compliment the character and history of the pub which is in a building dating back to the 17th Century.

Council planning officers stated the colour scheme chosen for repainting the front of the building and replacement signs were appropriate for the Grade II-listed building.

The decision comes after plans for the refurbishment were lodged in January.

RECOMMENDED READING:

Works on the building include repainting the outside of the building white, black and green, with copper-coloured letters used for the sign with the pub’s name.

The chosen colours match Greene King’s branding.

Existing hanging signs which are aged and no longer meet the company’s standards are set to be replaced with new lit ones featuring a picture of a windmill.

Plans stated the pub was in two buildings originally built as cottages the 17th Century, likely during reconstruction efforts following the siege of York during the English Civil War.

Ownership passed to the Lee family in the 18th Century, who leased a windmill on The Mount, giving the pub its name which was first recorded in 1735.

The Windmill Inn, in Blossom Street, York (Image: Google Maps)

The building went on to play an important part in the local economy in the 18th and 19th Century following the opening of York’s railway station.

It had its own brewhouse until 1893 and catered to travellers, providing stabling for around 65 horses.

The ghost of a girl run over by a brewer’s cart is also said to haunt the pub.

The building was granted listed status in 1968.

Plans stated: “The Windmill Inn has a rich history dating back to the 17th Century.

“It has been a staple in the Blossom Street area for centuries, serving as a gathering place for locals and travellers alike.

“The building itself is a fine example of traditional English pub architecture, with its charming exterior and welcoming atmosphere.”

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Sir Keir had misled Parliament by saying “full due process” was followed, that he had wrongly said Lord Mandelson cleared the vetting, and that he failed to put out all documents required under a parliamentary measure to disclose details of the appointment.

Lady Foster said: “There’s a definite need to deal with the issue of glorification of terrorism…”

Former Northern Ireland first minister Arlene Foster has said she received online abuse from an IRA supporter wishing the terrorist group had killed her father during the Troubles after she tried to ban “glorification of terrorism”.

Baroness Foster of Aghadrumsee said she received a social media message in March referring to the incident in 1979, after she tried to get the Government to change its Crime and Policing Bill to include stronger rules on banning the support for terror activities.

Lady Foster said the amendment was necessary in response to a lack of prosecutions under existing laws, despite a “growing glorification of terrorism and terrorists”.

READ MORE: Arlene Foster in bid to make it illegal to say ‘Up the Ra’READ MORE: Arlene Foster: Perception that Stormont reform being used to ’tilt constitutional balance’

The former Democratic Unionist Party leader also hit out at the break-in of a Church of Ireland Sunday School over Easter, and condemned apparent “complete silence” from Sinn Fein over the graffitiing of the Ten Commandments with the slogan “Up the ‘ra”.

Speaking in the House of Lords on Thursday, the non-affiliated peer, who had two spells as the leader of Northern Ireland, said: “I know the minister and many in this House recognise that this is a growing issue, and if there was any doubt of the fact that it is very much a real and live issue, a brief glimpse at my social media feeds after report stage in this House would confirm this to be the case.

“One particularly brazen poster said that he ‘wished the ‘provos had killed your Dad when they attacked him, up the ‘ra’.

“Of course that’s a reference to the attempted murder of my father by the IRA in 1979. That, of course, is something I have become quite resilient to, but (it) is entirely unacceptable that people can glorify terrorism as a way to make change happen.”

The online message referred to the shooting of Lady Foster’s father, a Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) reservist, by the IRA. She and her family had to move house as a result.

Lady Foster also referred to a break-in of a Church of Ireland Sunday School in Newtownbutler earlier this month, where vandals graffitied “Up the ‘Ra” over the Ten Commandments.

She said: “There was silence, complete silence, from the political wing of the IRA, in other words Sinn Fein. Nothing from their local representatives, and nothing from the self-appointed First Minister for all.”

Lady Foster added: “There’s a definite need to deal with the issue of glorification of terrorism, it has real consequences for young people being into extremism and thinking that terrorism is somehow cool and edgy, rather than learning about the fact that it leads to division, pain and hurt, mostly to their neighbours.

“I have to say the radicalisation of children should be something that we’re all concerned about in this House.”

The former first minister did not push her amendment to a vote in the House of Lords, as peers look to pass the Bill.

Instead ministers have offered a review of existing laws around the issue by the Government’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation Jonathan Hall KC.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

The changes will not affect payment rates but aim to bring greater consistency to how decisions are made across the three systems

The UK Government has introduced fresh legislation overhauling how key disability and health-related benefits are assessed, with the potential to affect millions of claimants throughout the country.

The amendments apply solely to Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)-administered benefits, including Personal Independence Payment (PIP), Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), and the health element of Universal Credit. The most recent figures reveal there are now over 3.9 million PIP claimants in England and Wales.

While the new rules leave payment rates unchanged, they seek to bring greater uniformity to how decisions are reached across the three systems. The revised regulations are intended to align assessment processes, particularly where comparable health conditions or disabilities are being considered under different benefits.

For claimants, this could result in a more standardised approach to how evidence is examined and how eligibility decisions are determined.

The UK Government stated the changes are designed to simplify the system and ensure people are treated fairly, regardless of which benefit they are claiming, reports the Daily Record.

It is worth noting that the majority of existing claimants are unlikely to experience any immediate change to their payments.

However, those submitting a new claim, undergoing a review, or appealing a decision may find differences in how their case is managed. These changes form part of a sweeping overhaul of health-related benefits, including recent amendments to the Universal Credit health element that came into force earlier this month.

Under the new arrangements, fresh claimants assessed as having limited capability for work and work-related activity will receive a reduced monthly payment of £217.26, rather than the £429.80 currently paid to existing claimants.

This latest legislative update is separate from the payment adjustments introduced on April 6 through the annual uprating process, but sits within a broader drive to reshape how the benefits system supports those living with long-term conditions.

Disability benefits, including PIP, are intended to assist people with the additional costs associated with living with a health condition or disability, while ESA and Universal Credit provide income support for those unable to work.

The DWP has faced persistent scrutiny regarding the way benefit assessments are conducted, with campaigners and charities voicing concerns about consistency and fairness in decision-making.

By harmonising rules across several benefits, the DWP seeks to reduce confusion and deliver better outcomes for claimants navigating the system.

Those currently in receipt of benefits are not required to take any action as a result of these changes.

However, anyone intending to submit a new claim or facing a reassessment is strongly advised to ensure their medical evidence and supporting documentation is fully up to date.

IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said we are heading for “the largest energy crisis we have ever faced,” stemming from the pinch-off of oil, gas and other vital supplies through the Strait of Hormuz.

The impact will be “higher petrol (gasoline) prices, higher gas prices, high electricity prices,” said Birol.

In an interview with Associated Press published today, he warned that flight cancellations could begin “soon” if oil supplies remain blocked by the Iran war.

And some parts of the world will be hit worse than others.

He shared that “the front line is the Asian countries” that rely on energy from the Middle East, naming Japan, Korea, India, China, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

“Then it will come to Europe and the Americas,” Birol continued.

Birol said Europe has “maybe 6 weeks or so (of) jet fuel left,” after the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz led to “the largest energy crisis we have ever faced.”

And if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened, Birol said that for Europe: “I can tell you soon we will hear the news that some of the flights from city A to city B might be cancelled as a result of a lack of jet fuel.

Where is it going to have the most effect?

“The countries that will suffer the most will not be those whose voices are heard a lot.

International Energy Agency chief says that Europe has ‘maybe six weeks’ of jet fuel left, says current shock is ‘the largest energy crisis we have ever faced’, according to AP report.

— The Spectator Index (@spectatorindex) April 16, 2026

Advertisement

“It will be mainly the developing countries. Poorer countries in Asia, in Africa and in Latin America,” said the Turkish economist and energy expert who has led the IEA since 2015.

The US is currently blockading Iranian ports, while Tehran has laid mines in the vital waterway to restrict traffic through the strait.

Nearly 20% of the world’s traded oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz in peacetime.

Birol warned that not reopening the waterway within weeks could compound the repercussions for global energy supplies.

Are you worried about the energy crisis? Let us know in the comments.

‘Britain must not back away from its support for the Ukraine – we have stood by a nation under siege and we should not flinch now’

Russia threat is no bluff

Vladimir Putin’s regime has crossed another dangerous line.

After unleashing a night of devastation on Kyiv, Russia is now openly threatening British targets, listing locations in England as potential strikes.

It is not bluff. It is a calculated escalation designed to intimidate, and it should alarm us all. We have seen before that the Kremlin is willing to carry out hostile acts on British soil.

The Salisbury poisoning was not just an outrage; it was a state-sponsored attack that killed Dawn Sturgess and put innocent lives at risk.

Now Moscow is again turning its sights towards the UK, attempting to bully Britain into backing away from its support for Ukraine. That must not happen.

We have done the right thing in standing by a nation under siege, and we should not flinch now. We must be clear: this is intimidation, pure and simple.

Putin’s aggression thrives on hesitation. The response throughout Europe must be unity, resolve and an unshakeable commitment to stand firm.

More embarrassment for Reform UK

Another day, another Reform UK embarrassment.

A local election candidate who once met King Charles has been exposed for spewing vile anti-Muslim hatred online, including a call to “blast them all off the face of the earth”.

As with other such Reform candidates, these are not slips of the tongue. They are extreme, dangerous views that have no place in public life.

Daniel Devaney’s belated admission that he was “well out of order” is nowhere near enough. The real question is how Nigel Farage’s party allowed him anywhere near the ballot paper.

With repeated failures in vetting exposed, Reform cannot shrug this off as a one-off. It is not. Politics demands responsibility. When parties cut corners, this is the result – hatred dressed up as candidacy.

Up, up and away

It is both moving and quietly heartbreaking to see the Up series reach its final chapter. The original “Big Brother”, it followed real lives with honesty, long before reality TV was born. Now, as some stories end, it reminds us how precious – and fragile – every life truly is.

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Tiger Woods ‘ attorney intends to fight an attempt by prosecutors to subpoena the golfer’s prescription drug records following his arrest last month in Florida on suspicion of driving under the influence.

Attorney Doug Duncan said this week in a court filing that Woods has a constitutional right to privacy when it comes to his prescription medications. The attorney asked a judge overseeing the case in Martin County, Florida to hold a hearing to determine if the drug records are necessary for the criminal investigation.

If the judge determines the drug records are necessary, Duncan asked for a protective order limiting their release only to prosecutors, law enforcement officers, state experts and Woods’ defense team.

Woods has pleaded not guilty to driving under the influence. A sheriff’s office report said deputies found two pain pills in his pocket and he showed signs of impairment after his SUV clipped a truck’s trailer and rolled over on its side.

Woods was traveling at high speeds on a beachside, residential road on Jupiter Island with a 30 mph (nearly 50 kph) speed limit when his Land Rover caused $5,000 in damage to the truck, according to an incident report. Woods agreed to a Breathalyzer test that showed no signs of alcohol, but refused a urine test, authorities said.

Prosecutors told the court they would issue a subpoena seeking copies of all prescription medication records for the legendary golfer on file at Lewis Pharmacy in Palm Beach, Florida from the start of the year through the end of last month.

Prosecutors also demanded in court papers on Wednesday that Woods reveal the names and locations of any witnesses he plans to present in his defense.

___

Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @mikeysid.bsky.social.

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A federal immigration agent accused of pointing his gun at occupants of a car after pulling alongside them on a Minneapolis-area highway is wanted on felony assault charges, Minnesota prosecutors said Thursday.

Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said she believes it is the first criminal case brought against a federal immigration officer involved in the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration enforcement that surged federal authorities into cities including Los Angeles, Chicago and New Orleans.

“There is no such thing as absolute immunity for federal agents who violate the law in the state of Minnesota,” Moriarty told a news conference, saying the agent acted outside the scope of a federal officers’ authority.

An arrest warrant filed in Hennepin County, which includes Minneapolis, says Gregory Donnell Morgan Jr. is charged with two counts of second-degree assault. Minnesota authorities say Morgan, 35, was on duty as an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent when the incident occurred Feb. 5.

The driver and front-seat passenger of a car called 911 saying the driver of an unmarked SUV pulled alongside them, rolled down his window and pointed a handgun at them both. The car’s driver told investigators they feared it was a “crazy person driving down the road aiming guns at people,” according to the warrant.

A spokesman for Moriarty’s office said no arrangements have been made for Morgan to surrender and that there is an active nationwide warrant for his arrest. If convicted, Morgan faces up to seven years in prison for each assault charge.

Department of Homeland Security and Justice Department officials didn’t immediately respond to emails seeking comment.

A person returning a call to a possible phone listing for Morgan said it was a wrong number for him. A message sent to a possible email address for Morgan bounced back as undeliverable. No one immediately returned a phone message left at a number for a person listed as sharing an address with Morgan. It was not immediately known if he had an attorney who could speak for him.

Accused agent told state investigators he ‘feared for his safety’

Moriarty said during a news conference that Morgan was driving a rented, unmarked SUV on the shoulder of the highway when a car also moved into the shoulder to try to slow Morgan down, its driver not knowing he was an officer. After the car returned to the legal lane, she said, Morgan pulled up alongside and pointed his service weapon at the two people in the car.

According to the warrant, Morgan then merged his SUV back into traffic ahead of the victims, who took cellphone photos of the SUV’s license plate.

The warrant does not identify the victims.

Morgan and his partner, who was not charged, told investigators they were returning at the end of their shift to the federal building being used to stage officers. The arrest warrant says Morgan “made no claim that he was conducting any law-enforcement operation or activity or responding to any emergency situation.”

The charges could intensify a clash between the Trump administration and Minnesota officials over the crackdown. Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, has warned that the Justice Department could investigate and prosecute state or local officials who arrest federal agents for performing their official duties.

Moriarty said she is not concerned about blowback from federal authorities and that her office will “hold people accountable if they violate the laws of the state.”

Michael Gerhardt, a constitutional law professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said federal officers are granted immunity for actions within the scope of their official responsibilities.

He said the actions described in the arrest warrant don’t seem relevant to the officer’s duties. But because he was on-duty at the time, the officer could petition to move the charges to federal court and make a claim for immunity.

“When you look at it more closely, flashing a gun is a serious threat,” Gerhardt said. “And there’s a good argument that isn’t part of his official duties … it’s abusing his powers.”

Minnesota still investigating killings of 2 US citizens by federal officers

DHS deployed about 3,000 federal officers to the Minneapolis-St. Paul area from December through February in what the department called its “ largest immigration enforcement operation ever.” The Minnesota operation led to thousands of arrests, angry mass protests and the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens.

Backlash over the officers’ aggressive tactics mounted, and two of the crackdown’s most high profile leaders were soon gone. Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in March shortly after the Minnesota surge ended. That same month, Gregory Bovino, the Border Patrol sector chief who led immigration operations in several large cities, announced his retirement.

Minnesota authorities continue to investigate the conduct of federal officers during the immigration crackdown, insisting they can’t trust the federal government to investigate itself. Minnesota sued the Trump administration last month for access to evidence in three cases involving shootings by federal officers, including the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.

___

Lauer reported from Philadelphia and Bynum reported from Savannah, Georgia. Associated Press reporters Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington and Hannah Fingerhut in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed.